This thesis deals with the topic of liability for damage caused by a defect in a product, i.e. liability of a producer (but also of another entity, such as the supplier or importer) for damage caused by the defective product to the health or property of the user (consumer) or other third persons. The primary area of this issue that the thesis has examined is the legal regulation in the UK (liability for damage caused by a defect in a product is in the UK usually expressed as "Product liability"). The main reason why I have chosen to describe the British legal regulation is my study experience in the UK at Northumbria University, where I studied within the program Erasmus+. In the UK, I had the opportunity to find all the resources, experience and incentives necessary in order to analyze the topic of Product liability and therefore, to write this thesis. The aim of this thesis is not only the description of the British Product liability, but also its comparison with the Czech regulation. This thesis then draws a clear conclusion that Product liability in the UK is as compared to the Czech Republic an institute much more frequently used and British regulation is compared to the Czech one more sophisticated and detailed. On the other hand, for the British consumers the British regulation may be, due...

Orientador: Yvete Flávio da Costa / Banca: Antônio Marcio da Cunha Guimarães / Banca: Riva Sobrado de Freitas / Resumo: Tidas as tutelas de urgência como gênero diferenciado dentro das tutelas jurisdicionais, a progressiva importância que estas ganham no meio jurídico, demonstra a adoção, por parte dos legisladores e aplicadores do Direito, do princípio da efetividade, mesmo em face ao da segurança jurídica. Assim, a faculdade ofertada aos magistrados de concessão das mesmas, apresenta-se como verdadeira obrigação, a partir do momento em que analisamos a estrutura destas, que em seu sumário procedimento exige maior serenidade e agilidade de decisões para atingir seu escopo de medida de segurança, inclusive adotando uma cognição sumária, sacrificando-se a certeza, em nome de um processo mais útil, apto e eficaz. Desta forma, mesmo nas questões inaudita altera pars, de maior gravidade, e que sofrem maior resistência por parte dos magistrados, o status de obrigatoriedade de concessão, quando preenchidos os elementos embasadores (em especial fumus boni iuris e periculum in mora), a fim de não oferecer risco a jurisdição, que visam garantir, tornam tais tutelas verdadeiras pedras preciosas dentro do nosso moroso sistema processual. E quando negadas de maneira a ameaçar, ou mesmo tornar irreparável o dano ao direito do requerente, deve sim ser alvo de ações de responsabilização contra o órgão jurisdicional que erroneamente negou sua efetivação. Analisar a extensão da responsabilidade objetiva do Estado (na qual bastam estarem configurados o dano e o nexo causal), e subjetiva do Magistrado, é certamente a demonstração da efetividade do Estado de Direito / Abstract: Considered the urgency guardianships as differentiated sort inside of the jurisdictional guardianships, the gradual importance that these earn in the legal way, demonstrates the adoption, on the part of the legislators and applicators of the Right, of the principle of the effectiveness, even in face of the legal security. Thus, the option offered to the magistrates of concession of the same ones, is presented as true obligation, from the moment where we also analyze the structure of these, that in its summary procedure greater demands serenity and agility of decisions to reach its target of measure of security, adopting a summary cognition, sacrificing the certainty, on behalf of a more useful process, apt and efficient. In such a way, exactly in the questions inaudita altera pars, of bigger gravity, and that they suffer greater resistance on the part from the magistrates, the status of concession obligatoriness, when filled the elements embased (in special fumus boni iuris and periculum in mora), in order not to offer risk to the jurisdiction, whom they aim at to guarantee, become such true guardianships inside precious rocks of our weak procedural system. And when denied in way to threaten, or yet to become irreparable the damage to the right of the petitioner, it must yes be white of action of responsabilização against the judicial body that erroneamente denied its efetivação. To analyze the extension of the objective responsibility of the State (in which they are enough to be configured the damage and the causal nexus), and subjective of the Magistrate, is certainly the demonstration of the effectiveness of the Rule of law / Mestre

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:24:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2008-10-24Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T19:10:36Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 alvares_dv_me_fran.pdf: 1168615 bytes, checksum: 5fe7e52eaa913b4a3bf426ee2182b951 (MD5) / Tidas as tutelas de urgência como gênero diferenciado dentro das tutelas jurisdicionais, a progressiva importância que estas ganham no meio jurídico, demonstra a adoção, por parte dos legisladores e aplicadores do Direito, do princípio da efetividade, mesmo em face ao da segurança jurídica. Assim, a faculdade ofertada aos magistrados de concessão das mesmas, apresenta-se como verdadeira obrigação, a partir do momento em que analisamos a estrutura destas, que em seu sumário procedimento exige maior serenidade e agilidade de decisões para atingir seu escopo de medida de segurança, inclusive adotando uma cognição sumária, sacrificando-se a certeza, em nome de um processo mais útil, apto e eficaz. Desta forma, mesmo nas questões inaudita altera pars, de maior gravidade, e que sofrem maior resistência por parte dos magistrados, o status de obrigatoriedade de concessão, quando preenchidos os elementos embasadores (em especial fumus boni iuris e periculum in mora), a fim de não oferecer risco a jurisdição, que visam garantir, tornam tais tutelas verdadeiras pedras preciosas dentro do nosso moroso sistema processual. E quando negadas de maneira a ameaçar, ou mesmo tornar irreparável o dano ao direito do requerente, deve sim ser alvo de ações de responsabilização contra o órgão jurisdicional que erroneamente negou sua efetivação. Analisar a extensão da responsabilidade objetiva do Estado (na qual bastam estarem configurados o dano e o nexo causal), e subjetiva do Magistrado, é certamente a demonstração da efetividade do Estado de Direito / Considered the urgency guardianships as differentiated sort inside of the jurisdictional guardianships, the gradual importance that these earn in the legal way, demonstrates the adoption, on the part of the legislators and applicators of the Right, of the principle of the effectiveness, even in face of the legal security. Thus, the option offered to the magistrates of concession of the same ones, is presented as true obligation, from the moment where we also analyze the structure of these, that in its summary procedure greater demands serenity and agility of decisions to reach its target of measure of security, adopting a summary cognition, sacrificing the certainty, on behalf of a more useful process, apt and efficient. In such a way, exactly in the questions inaudita altera pars, of bigger gravity, and that they suffer greater resistance on the part from the magistrates, the status of concession obligatoriness, when filled the elements embased (in special fumus boni iuris and periculum in mora), in order not to offer risk to the jurisdiction, whom they aim at to guarantee, become such true guardianships inside precious rocks of our weak procedural system. And when denied in way to threaten, or yet to become irreparable the damage to the right of the petitioner, it must yes be white of action of responsabilização against the judicial body that erroneamente denied its efetivação. To analyze the extension of the objective responsibility of the State (in which they are enough to be configured the damage and the causal nexus), and subjective of the Magistrate, is certainly the demonstration of the effectiveness of the Rule of law

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CledinaMF_DISSERT_Parcial.pdf: 830110 bytes, checksum: bbcf01b1a8e57fe3010e696f6540a4d9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-08-26 / The civil liability of the distribution and retail fuel stems from the fact business activity developed to be high risk and can be said as risk inherent or latent danger that has predictability and normality characterized by placing the consumer in a position of vulnerability, such as the environment, both public policies defined and constitutional protection. Consumer protection as a fundamental right and the environment as the primacy of social order aims the welfare and social justice, as inserted right to the third dimension, are guarded by the State when it creates operational standards through public policies and indirectly intervenes in the economic order. This intervention is due to consumer protection and the environment are economic order principles, founded on free initiative and free competition, ensuring everyone a dignified existence which underlies the irradiation of fundamental rights in private initiative, before the commercial evaluation, mass consumption, the emergence of new technologies that link consumers to the environment before the protection of life, health and safety and ensuring a better quality of life for present and future generations. To repair this damage and the right to information are provided as fundamental rights that put the person at the epicenter of the relations and collective interest stands out against individual interests that to be done need public-private partnership. In such a way that the used methodology was an analysis of documents correlating them with bibliographic sources whose goals are to recognize the civil responsibility as limit to subjective right, having to develop a social function where guilt and risk grow distant and the damage is configured as a consequence of inherent risk, requiring the State interventional postures in fulfilling its public policy; prevailing in these risky activities the solidarity of those involved in the chain of production and socialization of damage forward those are provided directly of products of hazardous nature that put in a position of vulnerability the environment and the consumer / A responsabilidade civil da distribui??o e revenda de combust?vel decorre do fato da atividade empresarial desenvolvida ser de elevado risco, podendo se dizer como de risco inerente ou periculosidade latente, que tem a previsibilidade e normalidade como caracter?stica, colocando em posi??o de vulnerabilidade o consumidor, como o meio ambiente, ambos com pol?ticas p?blicas definidas e com prote??o constitucional. A prote??o do consumidor como direito fundamental e o meio ambiente como primado da ordem social tem como objetivo o bem-estar e justi?a social, inseridos como direito de terceira dimens?o, s?o resguardados pelo Estado quando cria normas de operacionaliza??o atrav?s das pol?ticas p?blicas e de forma indireta interv?m na ordem econ?mica. Esta interven??o se d? em decorr?ncia da defesa do consumidor e do meio ambiente serem princ?pios da Ordem Econ?mica, fundado na livre iniciativa e na livre concorr?ncia, assegurando a todos uma exist?ncia digna, que fundamenta a irradia??o dos direitos fundamentais na iniciativa privada, diante da evolu??o comercial, do consumo em massa, do surgimento de novas tecnologias que vinculam consumidor ao meio ambiente diante da prote??o ? vida, ? sa?de e seguran?a e garantia de uma melhor qualidade de vida para as presentes e futuras gera??es. Para isto a repara??o do dano, bem como direito ? informa??o s?o previstos como direitos fundamentais, que colocam a pessoa no epicentro das rela??es e o interesse coletivo se sobressaem diante interesses individuais que para serem concretizados necessitam da parceria p?blica privada. De forma que a metodologia usada foi ? an?lise de documentos correlacionando-os com fontes bibliogr?ficas, cujos objetivos ? reconhecer a responsabilidade civil como limite ao direito subjetivo, passando a ter uma fun??o social, onde a culpa e o risco, v?o se distanciando e o dano se configura como consequ?ncia inerente ao risco, exigindo do Estado, posturas interventivas no cumprimento de suas pol?ticas p?blicas; devendo prevalecer nestas atividades de risco ? solidariedade dos envolvidos na cadeia de produ??o e a socializa??o do dano frente aqueles que usufruem diretamente de produtos de natureza perigosa, que colocam em posi??o de vulnerabilidade o meio ambiente e o consumidor

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / A responsabilidade civil do advogado é um tema que merece destaque sob a perspectiva civil constitucional. A abrangência dessa relação jurídica pelo Código de Defesa do Consumidor e a natureza negocial multiforme da relação estabelecida entre o advogado e o cliente, cuja normativa deve ser estabecida tendo em vista o caso concreto, são pontos de destaque desse trabalho, assim como a aplicabilidade do consentimento informado. Nessa toada, pretende-se conferir o enfoque funcional a partir da releitura das classificações tradicionais da responsabilidade civil em contratual, extracontratual, subjetiva, objetiva e entre as obrigações de meio e resultado para em seguida, analisarmos das hipóteses mais frequentes de responsabilização, quais sejam: a perda de uma chance, o abuso do direito processual e a reversão de liminares revertidas ao final do processo. Por fim, dentre as tendências de prevenção e precaução de danos da responsabilidade civil, revela-se a formalização de seguros de responsabilidade profissional para advogados. / Liability of attorney is a topic that deserves attention from the perspective of the constitutional civil measure. The scope of this legal relationship by the Consumer Protection Code and the nature of multifaceted relationship between lawyer and client, whose rules must be developed further in view of the case, are highlights of this work, as well as the applicability of informed consent. In this tune, it is intended to confer the functional approach from the rereading of traditional classifications of liability in contract, tort, subjective, objective, and between the obligations of means and results to then analyze the most common assumptions of accountability, which are: the loss of a chance, the abuse of procedural law and the reversal of court orders reversed at the end of the process. Finally, among the trends of precaution and prevention of damage to civil liability, it is the formalization of professional liability insurance for lawyers.

A situation that has been generated several confusions is the inclusion of person damage next to moral damage in the Civil Code of 1984, both in the national doctrine and judicial decisions.The Author analyses the problems arising from non-property damages in the Peruvian legal system, giving a brief description of its arrival to our Legislation and noting the major directions Doctrine has taken. He focuses on the old and new challenges Judges have on this matter and elaborates a list of considerations to positions seated on the Peruvian Civil Procedure. / Una situación que ha generado severas confusiones es la inclusión del daño a la persona junto al daño moral en el Código Civil de 1984, tanto en la doctrina nacional como en los pronunciamientos judiciales.En este artículo el autor examina la problemática de los daños extrapatrimoniales en el ordenamiento peruano, reseñando su génesis legislativo y las principales tendencias doctrinarias al respecto. Se enfoca en los viejos y nuevos retos de los Juzgadores en el daño extrapatrimonal y ofrece cuestionamientos a posturas mayoritarias en el ámbito procesal.

O instituto jurídico da responsabilidade civil é um dos instrumentos previstos em lei, do qual qualquer paciente pode se valer para promover uma ação de reparação de danos contra o cirurgião-dentista, pelos prejuízos causados. Com o incremento do número de processos, aumenta proporcionalmente a importância do conhecimento das características dessas demandas, no intuito de estabelecer uma orientação fundamentada para que o profissional possa se resguardar e, na ocorrência de lides, encontrar-se municiado para produzir sua competente defesa. Ante tal fato, torna-se fundamental a verificação dos entendimentos dos Tribunais sobre a responsabilidade civil dos cirurgiões-dentistas, sendo que não existem pesquisas que se preocupam em analisar o tema em âmbito nacional. O objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar o levantamento das jurisprudências a respeito das ações de responsabilidade civil promovidas contra o cirurgião-dentista, utilizando a Internet, bem como apresentar o panorama e o entendimento dos principais temas perante os Tribunais do Brasil. Foram obtidos, quando possível, dados relativos à origem, à obrigação assumida, ao seu fundamento, ao agente, à inversão do ônus da prova e às especialidades mais demandadas. Para facilitar a comparação entre os vários entes da Federação, foi proposto um coeficiente de experiência processual que relaciona o número de processos e a quantidade de cirurgiões-dentistas. Foram levantadas 482 jurisprudências, sendo 1 no Supremo Tribunal Federal, 3 no Superior Tribunal de Justiça e 478 nos Tribunais Estaduais e Distrito Federal. Dessas 478, foi possível verificar uma tendência de aumento no número e na quantidade de Estados que tiveram experiências com processos judiciais. Em relação à origem, 18,6% foram consideradas como Contratual, enquanto 6% relacionavam-na como Extracontratual. Foram encontradas 10,6% como obrigação de resultado e, 4,1% como obrigação de meio. Como fundamento, 58,15% tiveram a Teoria Subjetiva, enquanto que 8,15% a Teoria Objetiva. A responsabilidade do agente foi observada como direta em 99,3% e, em 0,6%, como indireta. Houve o deferimento da inversão do ônus da prova em 2,7% dos casos. Em 48,3%, foi possível identificar as especialidades odontológicas, das quais as mais citadas foram: cirurgia (32,9%); prótese (26,4%); ortodontia (15,6%); implantodontia (13%); endodontia (6,5%), periodontia (2,6%); pediatria (1,7%); patologia (0,9%) e, por último, disfunção têmporo-mandibular e dor oro-facial (0,4%). Os Estados que apresentaram maior quantidade de processos foram: Rio de Janeiro, com 107; Minas Gerais, com 101; São Paulo, com 94; Rio Grande do Sul, com 75; o Distrito Federal, com 32. Quanto ao coeficiente de experiência processual, a cada 1.000 profissionais, no Brasil, 2,23 já tiveram experiência com processos. A Região mais exposta a processos foi a Região Sul, seguida das Regiões Centro-Oeste, Sudeste, Norte e Nordeste. Em relação aos Estados e Distrito Federal, verificou-se que o Distrito Federal apresenta 6,22 profissionais processados civilmente a cada 1.000. No Rio Grande do Sul são 5,95; no Rio de Janeiro, 4,22; Minas Gerais, 3,82; Rondônia, 2,15; Paraná, 1,91; Mato Grosso do Sul, 1,81; Espírito Santo, 1,75; Santa Catarina, 1,36; São Paulo, 1,31; Bahia, 1,13; Goiás, 1,06; Tocantins, 0,89; Alagoas, 0,54; Rio Grande do Norte, 0,43; e, por último, no Estado de Pernambuco, 0,18. / The civil liability act is one of the resources provided by law, which can be used by any patient in order to bring a legal action for damages against dentists. With the increase in the number of cases, the necessity of a sound knowledge on the features of these lawsuits has proportionally augmented, so that the professionals may have a solid orientation to protect themselves, and in case of a legal process, be able to produce their competent defense. In view of this fact, the checking of the jurisprudences concerning dentists\' civil liability becomes of paramount importance, since in Brazil there are no studies analyzing this matter. The objective of this study has been to survey the jurisprudences of civil liability lawsuits against dentists, by using the Internet, as well as to present an outlook on jurisprudences related to the main topics in Brazilian Courts. When possible, data have been obtained regarding the origin, professional obligation, legal basis, defendant, inversion of the burden of proof, and more demanded dental specialties. In order to facilitate the comparison between the Brazilian states, a coefficient of procedural experience has been proposed. This coefficient correlates the number of legal processes and the quantity of dentists. 482 jurisprudences have been studied: 01, in the Federal Supreme Court; 03, in the Supreme Court of Justice, and 478, in the State Courts and the Federal District. From these 478, it has been possible to verify an increasing trend in the number and quantity of the states which have experienced lawsuits. As to the origin, 18.6% have been considered contractual, while 6%, extracontractual. 10.6% have been regarded as obligation de résultat (obligation of result), and 4.1%, as obligation de moyens (obligation of means). 58.15% have been legally based on the Subjective Theory, whereas 8.15%, on the Objective Theory. The liability of the defendant has been evaluated as direct in 99.3%, and indirect in 0.6%. The granting of the inversion of the burden of proof has occurred in 2.7% of the cases. It has been possible to identify the dental specialties in 48.3%, from which the most cited ones have been: dental surgery (32.9%), prosthodontics (26.4%), orthodontics (15.6%), implantology (13%), endodontics (6.5%), periodontics (2.6%), pediatrics (1.7%), pathology (0.9%), and finally, temporomandibular joint dysfunction and orofacial pain (0.4%). The states presenting the largest quantity of legal processes have been: Rio de Janeiro, with 107, Minas Gerais with 101, São Paulo with 94, Rio Grande do Sul with 75, the Federal District with 32. Concerning the coefficient of procedural experience, in Brazil, 2.23 professionals have already experienced lawsuits out of 1,000. The Southern Region has had more lawsuits, followed by the Central-Western, Southeastern, Northern, and Northeastern ones. In relation to the states and the Federal District, it has been noted that the Federal District have presented 6.22 professionals who have faced civil lawsuit out of 1,000; Rio Grande do Sul, 5.95; Rio de Janeiro, 4.22; Minas Gerais, 3.82; Rondônia, 2.15; Paraná, 1.91; Mato Gosso do Sul, 1.81; Espírito Santo, 1.75; Santa Catarina, 1.36; São Paulo, 1.31; Bahia, 1.13; Goiás, 1.06; Tocantins, 0.89; Alagoas, 0.54; Rio Grande do Norte, 0.43; and Pernambuco, 0,18.

Du fait de son rôle moteur de l’économie marocaine, le secteur de la construction agit comme véritable levier de croissance. Passé la consolidation actuelle, il devrait continuer son développement dans les années à venir, du fait de la conjonction de plusieurs facteurs endogènes.Toutes les études juridiques menées à ce jour au Maroc n’ont traité que de la responsabilité contractuelle des constructeurs sans jamais pour autant aborder leur responsabilité extracontractuelle et encore moins son assurance. La présente thèse essaie d’analyser la responsabilité extra contractuelle des constructeurs dans le cadre de législation marocaine tout en la comparant son traitement par d’autres législations européennes (France, Grande Bretagne, Allemagne et Espagne) ou africaines (Algérie, Tunisie et Sénégal). Ce choix est d'abord motivé par l'existence actuelle d'un important contentieux entre les constructeurs et les maitres d’ouvrage de nature extra contractuelle. Il repose également sur l'objectif de rechercher les explications objectives de ce contentieux dans le cadre du jeu des règles de la responsabilité des constructeurs tracées par la législation marocaine.En matière d’assurance construction, le Maroc s’est mis tardivement à l’instauration d’une obligation d’assurance à travers la loi 59-13 promulguée par Dahir 1.16.129 du 25 Aout 2016 modifiant et complétant la loi 17-99 portant code des assurances - B.O 6506 du 6-10-2016. Or, ce système d’assurance obligatoire mis en place actuellement ne pourrait être efficace et répondre aux aspirations des professionnels que s’il satisfasse à des conditions tirées des expériences passées d’autres pays tels la Tunisie et la France. / Thanks to its driving force in the Moroccan economy, the building sector acts as an effective impetus growth .Apart from the current consolidation ,it should further its development in the following years .Through a combination of several endogenous factors. All legal studies undertaken in MOROCCO up to now have just dealt with manufacturers contractual liability without considering their contractual liability not to mention its insurance. The present thesis tries to analyse the extra contractual liability within MOROCCAN LAW while comparing it with European legislations such as FRANCE, GREAT BRITAIN, GERMANY and SPAIN or African legislations ALGERIA TUNISIA and SENEGAL. This choice is primarily motivated by the current existence of significant conflicts between builders and the extra contractual property owners. One of its main objectives is to find out sound explanations to these conflicts in the game rules of builders liability set by Moroccan legislation. In terms of construction insurance, MOROCCO has finally elaborated the introduction of a compulsory insurance through the 59-13 law promulgated by Dahir 1.16.129 of 25th august 2016 amending and supplementing law 17.99 insurance code in B.O 6506 of 6th October 2016. Now this compulsory insurance system currently operational could be effective and satisfy the professionals aspirations if it draws lessons from previous experiences of other countries such as TUNISIA and FRANCE.

La thèse examine la comparaison des effets du contrat d’entreprise en droit français et en droit vietnamien. Au sein des contrats spéciaux, dans un monde d’économie de services accrue, le contrat d’entreprise joue désormais un rôle majeur. Ses multiples facettes pourraient d’emblée permettre de dresser une liste de métiers. Elle serait haute en couleur, puisque la plupart des prestations de services peuvent se couler dans le moule juridique du contrat d’entreprise, pour le quel se trouvent concernés artisans,artistes, professions libérales, etc. Synallagmatique, le contrat d’entreprise engendre des obligations réciproques à la charge de l’entrepreneur et du maître de l’ouvrage. Elle a permis de mettre en évidence les obligations qui constituent le droit commun du louage d’ouvrage, et de s’apercevoir que les obligations nées du contrat d’entreprise ainsi que ses effets revêtent des contours spécifiques qui s’expliquent par particularités de la convention. Ces particularités sont indéniables s’agissant des obligations principales et accessoires de l’entrepreneur à l’égard du maître de l’ouvrage et à l’inverse. Ces deux parties devraient être sanctionnées pour l’inexécution des obligations contractuelles et être exonérées de la responsabilité en justifiant les causes d’exonération. L’étude comparative de ces particularités en droit français et en droit vietnamien permettra de constater les similitudes et les divergences entre les deux systèmes juridiques. Les deux pays sont proches sur le plan juridique. Ainsi, la conclusion qui s’en dégage est que certaines dispositions du droit français pourraient utilement inspirer les législateurs vietnamiens et vice versa. / The thesis examines the comparison of the effects of the contract of enterprise in Vietnamese law and French law. Within the special contracts, in a world of greater economy of services, the contract of enterprise plays from now on a major role with various operations. It would be with a ruddy complexion, because most of the services can steal into the legal mold of the contract of enterprise, thus that are concerned craftsmen, artists, medical services, liberal professions, etc. Synallagmatic, the contract of enterprise engenders mutual obligations chargeable to the contractor and the owner. The study allowed to point out the obligations that constitute the common rules of the contract of enterprise and, to notice that the obligations following the contract of enterprise are specific because of the particular aspects of this agreement.The particularities are undeniable with respect to the main and secondary obligations of the contractor towards his owner and on the contrary. Both parties should be sanctioned by the non-fulfillment of the contractual obligations and to be exempted from the responsibility by justifying the causes of exemption. Comparative studies of these particularities in French law and in Vietnamese law will allow to notice the similarities and the differences between both legal systems. The two countries are close on the legal plan. Thus, the conclusion that emerges is that certain provisions of the French law could usefully inspire the Vietnamese legislators and vice versa

Research on New Procedures Using a Method That Has Not Yet Been Used in Clinical Practice on a Living Human Abstract Uterus transplantation, use of hypothermia in acute myocardial infarction or gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy, these are the topics of three Czech on going researches of novel medical methods, to which this thesis is devoted. The aim of this thesis is to elaborate on the whole issue of new methods by presenting the Czech legislative framework and current clinical practice and to assess the overall situation in this area. In one of the chapters, attention is also paid to the potential legal ground for the possibility of compensating patients for injury, ie civil liability, most likely occurring as a liability for the non lege artis procedure or as a specific type of strict no-fault liability.