No description available.

Este trabalho pretende, a partir da análise das obras literárias Casa de Boneca (1879) de Henrik Ibsen e Dom Casmurro (1899) de Machado de Assis, verificar a atualidade da crise representada nas personagens femininas Nora e Capitu. Trata-se de identificar a relação entre forma artística e a experiência, tendo em vista o jogo de espelhos entre arte e vida. Reconhecer, portanto, como a estrutura social, mais especificamente a familiar, está refletida no drama e no romance do século XIX. Desde a cisão entre esfera pública e doméstica traçar encontros e desencontros entre as personagens que estão inseridas na ficção presas na rede do patriarcado. A crise flagrada com a saída de Nora e o exílio de Capitu nos deixa a pergunta sobre que tipo de sociabilidade somos capazes de construir sob a exclusão inevitável proposta pelo sistema capitalista. / The aim of this study is to anylise two literary works: Casa de Boneca (Doll\'s House) by Henrik Ibsen (1879) and Dom Casmurro by Machado de Assis (1899). The main idea was to verify if the crisis represented by the two female characters, Nora and Capitu, can be found nowadays. In other words, the objective is to identify the relationship between the artistic form and the real experience, focusing on situations as mirror games envolving life and art. Therefore, we will answer how the social and more specifically the family structure is reflected in the drama and in the romance of the 19th century. Based on the breaking of the social and the family actions, the profile of similarities and divergences between the characters that are inserted in the fiction, are captured and the domination of a patriarch emerges. From the crisis which made Nora leave home and provoked Capitus exile, a question arises: what type of social relationships are we able to construct under the inevitable circumstances of exclusion imposed by the capitalism society.

A une période où la Norvège cherchait à affirmer son identité, les auteurs du romantisme national comme Wergeland, Bjørnson ou Ibsen ont largement puisé dans une tradition qui faisait du paysan (bonde) le représentant le plus typique de l’Histoire nationale. Ils ont toutefois instrumentalisé cet héritage culturel, tout comme les auteurs de la génération suivante, Hamsun ou Olav Duun, et l’importance qu’ils ont accordée à la nature invite à considérer celle-ci comme la « matrice » des œuvres de cette époque. Une lecture chronotopique inspirée de Bakhtine permet de mettre en évidence cette mise en scène du passé et de la nature. L’illusion d’authenticité historique cache un travail d’écriture novateur qui ouvre des perspectives vers un monde imaginaire et apporte un réconfort face à la mort. / At a time when Norway was trying to assert its identity, authors of national romanticism such as Wergeland, Bjørnson or Ibsen widely took their inspiration from a tradition which made the peasant (bonde) the most representative icon of national History. They however manipulated this cultural heritage, as have authors from the next generation such as Hamsun or Olav Duun. The predominant role these authors attributed to nature brings us to consider nature as the “matrix” for the works of that time. A chronotopic analysis inspired by Bakhtine brings into perspective this staging of the past and of nature. The illusion of historical authenticity hides a creative exercise on writing that opens to an imaginary world and brings a spiritual relief to those facing death.

Esta investigação consiste de uma leitura psicanalítica da peça Peer Gynt, de Henrik Ibsen. Inicialmente, o autor apresenta a obra mencionada de forma sintética e explicita a sua trajetória de conhecimento e interesse pela obra. Em seguida, situa sua leitura numa tradição que remonta não apenas à longa história das interpretações psicanalíticas de obras de arte, mas também àquela das análises realizadas sobre essa obra em particular. Dentre as últimas, apresenta e critica as análises feitas sobre a peça por W. Reich, G. Groddeck, M. Little e R. May. Também resgata os comentários de Freud sobre Ibsen e suas obras. A partir daí, apoiando-se em uma perspectiva metodológica dialógica, inspirada por M. Bahktin, bem como no método psicanalítico de investigação, o autor investe na criação de uma construção interpretativa do drama. Ao longo dessa construção, certas passagens da obra ganham visibilidade e sentidos renovados a partir do diálogo com referenciais teórico-clinicos de alguns autores da psicanálise contemporânea (D. Winnicott, C. Bollas, T. Ogden, entre outros). É desta forma que certos temas como a impossibilidade de sonhar, a mentira, o trauma, a convenção, o falso, a amorfia, o self, entre outros, vão surgir e ser desdobrados. Tal investigação se torna, por fim, uma possibilidade de ampliar e atualizar a compreensão da peça, inserindo-a no debate sobre a condição humana desde o viés do pensamento psicanalítico contemporâneo / This research consists of a psychoanalytic reading of Henrik Ibsens play \"Peer Gynt\". Initially, the author presents the aforementioned play in a concise way and makes explicit the history of his knowledge and interest for this work. Then he places his reading amongst a tradition that goes back not only to the long history of psychoanalytic interpretations of works of art, but also to that of the interpretations about this particular work. Among the latter he presents and criticizes the interpretations made by W. Reich, G. Groddeck, M. Little and R. May. He also recollects Freud\'s comments on Ibsen and his works. Thereafter, relying on a dialogical methodological perspective, inspired by M. Bahktin, as well as on the psychoanalytic method of investigation, the author engages in drawing up an interpretative construction on the drama. Throughout this construction, certain parts of the play gain visibility and renewed meanings rise from the dialogue with theoretical and clinical references from some contemporary psychoanalytic authors (D. Winnicott, C. Bollas, T. Ogden, and others). This is how certain themes such as the impossibility of dreaming, the lie, the trauma, the convention, the false, the formlessness, the self, and others will appear and be unfolded. This research becomes, finally, an opportunity to broaden and update the understanding of the play, casting it into the debate around the human condition from the bias of contemporary psychoanalytic thought

Esta investigação consiste de uma leitura psicanalítica da peça Peer Gynt, de Henrik Ibsen. Inicialmente, o autor apresenta a obra mencionada de forma sintética e explicita a sua trajetória de conhecimento e interesse pela obra. Em seguida, situa sua leitura numa tradição que remonta não apenas à longa história das interpretações psicanalíticas de obras de arte, mas também àquela das análises realizadas sobre essa obra em particular. Dentre as últimas, apresenta e critica as análises feitas sobre a peça por W. Reich, G. Groddeck, M. Little e R. May. Também resgata os comentários de Freud sobre Ibsen e suas obras. A partir daí, apoiando-se em uma perspectiva metodológica dialógica, inspirada por M. Bahktin, bem como no método psicanalítico de investigação, o autor investe na criação de uma construção interpretativa do drama. Ao longo dessa construção, certas passagens da obra ganham visibilidade e sentidos renovados a partir do diálogo com referenciais teórico-clinicos de alguns autores da psicanálise contemporânea (D. Winnicott, C. Bollas, T. Ogden, entre outros). É desta forma que certos temas como a impossibilidade de sonhar, a mentira, o trauma, a convenção, o falso, a amorfia, o self, entre outros, vão surgir e ser desdobrados. Tal investigação se torna, por fim, uma possibilidade de ampliar e atualizar a compreensão da peça, inserindo-a no debate sobre a condição humana desde o viés do pensamento psicanalítico contemporâneo / This research consists of a psychoanalytic reading of Henrik Ibsens play \"Peer Gynt\". Initially, the author presents the aforementioned play in a concise way and makes explicit the history of his knowledge and interest for this work. Then he places his reading amongst a tradition that goes back not only to the long history of psychoanalytic interpretations of works of art, but also to that of the interpretations about this particular work. Among the latter he presents and criticizes the interpretations made by W. Reich, G. Groddeck, M. Little and R. May. He also recollects Freud\'s comments on Ibsen and his works. Thereafter, relying on a dialogical methodological perspective, inspired by M. Bahktin, as well as on the psychoanalytic method of investigation, the author engages in drawing up an interpretative construction on the drama. Throughout this construction, certain parts of the play gain visibility and renewed meanings rise from the dialogue with theoretical and clinical references from some contemporary psychoanalytic authors (D. Winnicott, C. Bollas, T. Ogden, and others). This is how certain themes such as the impossibility of dreaming, the lie, the trauma, the convention, the false, the formlessness, the self, and others will appear and be unfolded. This research becomes, finally, an opportunity to broaden and update the understanding of the play, casting it into the debate around the human condition from the bias of contemporary psychoanalytic thought

Mori Ōgai’s (1862-1922) 1909 translation and the subsequent theater production of Henrik Ibsen’s 1896 play John Gabriel Borkman was in many ways instrumental in the formation of Japanese Meiji-era shingeki theater. Through his career as a translator, Ōgai’s translation approach shifted from one of decreasingly relying on domestication techniques to staying more faithful to the source text through use of foreignization techniques and arguably towards what has been identified by Eugene Nida and Jin Di as dynamical equivalence or equivalent effect, respectively, in drama translation. In this project, Ōgai’s translation of John Gabriel Borkman is examined using a set of categories peculiar to drama translation, as proposed by Chinese scholars Xu and Cui (2011), again based on the theories of Nida and Di. The categories are intelligibility, brevity, characterization and actability. The results from the analysis are used to do a qualitative analysis of Ōgai’s approach to drama translation. Results from the study indicate that Ōgai put large emphasis on the intelligibility of the play, and perhaps over the aspects of brevity, characterization and actability. However, wherever the brevity aspect seems not to be in violation of any of the other aspects, Ōgai seems to have tried to adhere as close as possible to the source texts in terms of speaking length.

The primary purpose of this dissertation is to study the dialogue between the Scandinavian drama and the Uruguayan theatre; how drama from Scandinavia has been received in the Río de la Plata during the last hundred years; how it has been adapted and activated to be meaningful to the audience; how it has been integrated within the Uruguayan theatre and society and how the play changes with that new dialogue. As this is the first study of Scandinavian plays in Uruguay a secondary purpose is to document what has been put on stage; fifty-three productions, ninety percent of which were plays by Henrik Ibsen and August Strindberg. The study is organized in three parts: a) a historical and sociological description of the Uruguayan society and its theatre; b) a presentation of Scandinavian drama, staging of Scandinavian theatre and its reception during the twentieth century; c) a comparative analysis of the reception in its widest sense at different periods of eleven productions of two dramas by Ibsen and one by Strindberg. The work is thus part of a tradition of the history of reception. According to the hermeneutic method, the reading is done from the horizon of expectation at the time of the staging interwined with today’s perspective. I follow the Argentinean investigator of theatre Osvaldo Pellettieri’s definition of the concept “reception”: passive reception by the public; reproductive reception, reception including translation and criticism; productive reception, creative reception expressed as staging or as a text that is evidently influenced by another text. In studying the process from the source text of a play to the reception of a performance, the four steps that Patrice Pavis has pointed out have been followed: 1) the interidiomatic translation of the text, 2) the translation of the text into a manuscript as base for a production 3) the staging and 4) the performance as received by the public. More emphasis is put on the linguistic aspect of the reception and reconstruction than is generally the case in theatre research, as this study lies on the border between literature and theatre studies. Do the Scandinavian plays fall into the topics of the day, politically, socially, culturally and aesthetically? Ibsen’s and Strindberg’s dramatic production have drawn the attention of Uruguayan critics since 1894, four years before the public had the opportunity to see a play on stage in Montevideo. Their contents and dramatic aesthetics were evaluated and we can also see how their ideas are discussed and integrated in the social debate on womens’ rights and the economic consequences of divorce. In order to see where the critics put their emphasis, the following aspects were considered: the author, the plot and its actuality, the audience, the translation, the direction, the scenography, the acting, the scenery and the music. The emphasis and interest of the critics have changed during this period of a hundred year. At the turn of the century 1900 they focused on the plot, the protagonist and also put a lot of emphasis on the public’s reactions. A realistic interpretation was appreciated but its content was not related to the situation in the surrounding society. During the first half of last century we only find visiting companies from Europe playing the Scandinavian dramatists. At first they introduced Ibsen and later Strindberg to the public in Montevideo via performances made by European actors for a European public. The Montevidean public was sometimes amazed by the new theatrical form and stunned by the contents of the play, but, according to the critics, the spectators eventually accepted it all and thus widened their horizon. There is a great contrast in connection with the distribution of the critics' interests from the fifties onwards. The theme and its actuality were discussed, the author got a lot of space as did the director and the actors. The audience’s reaction was seldom commented upon, nor the scenography. Towards the end of the century the direction, the scenography and the scenery drew the critics’ attention on behalf of the actors, but the theme and its actuality preserved their interest. In the late forties the Uruguayan theatre had developed a theatre system. Scandinavian plays were now staged by native theatre groups and can be considered as integrated within the Uruguayan cultural and social system. We can see how the Scandinavian theatre performances accompanied theatre life in Montevideo; its rise during the fifties and sixties, its fall during the dictatorship of the seventies, its resurrection and its present condition, more free, more open and difficult to define in a few words. The last three chapters are a study of A doll’s House, An Enemy of the People and Creditors in Montevideo. It is a more detailed analysis of the translation of the texts, the transposition to the stage, how the performances relate to the cultural, social and political context and how they are received by the critics. A comparative study shows how the directors and the theatregroups have searched for different solutions to represent the plays. It shows great differences in the realization, differences that depend on the varying conditions of the groups; if they are part of the official theatre or an independent group, their political and aesthetical orientation, their intentions and artistic level and the social context in which the staging takes part.

Enemies of the People is a book that examines whistle-blowing—i.e., the unauthorized conveyance of sensitive information to mass media and authorities—and the social responses this performance provokes. The book develops a fresh view of this phenomenon by framing the trend of events according to a couple of fundamental elements found in tragedy. The book also includes a critical appraisal of the perspectives that set the tone in the existent whistle-blowing research. The prevalent one-sidedness found in this field of research is reviewed and contrasted with the contributions delivered in the present study. The analysis is based on three famous whistle-blowing cases that received a lot of attention in mass media: Ingvar Bratt and the Bofors affair; Odd F. Lindberg and the Norwegian seal hunting affair; and finally, Paul van Buitenen and the Leonardo-affair in the European Commission. The author claims that by studying the sociology of tragedy, it is possible to develop a new way of examining social processes where the final outcome is the excommunication of the appointed culprits through, for example, expulsion or avoidance. This purgatorial process is treated as a social status degradation, where the offender experiences a thorough social identity transformation that turns his or her social position to a lower social rank than initially held. The title of this book alludes to a stage play written by the Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen. His dramatic piece An Enemy of the People, written in 1882, plays a prominent part in this study.

Submitted by Giovanna Brasil (1154060@mackenzie.br) on 2017-08-15T18:21:43Z No. of bitstreams: 2 José Eduardo das Neves - Versão Final - 26-07-2017.pdf: 945018 bytes, checksum: 9fdf4d6c357b3ae366c961b5ff8ed029 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Aline Amarante (1146629@mackenzie.br) on 2017-08-22T19:02:37Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 José Eduardo das Neves - Versão Final - 26-07-2017.pdf: 945018 bytes, checksum: 9fdf4d6c357b3ae366c961b5ff8ed029 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-22T19:02:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 José Eduardo das Neves - Versão Final - 26-07-2017.pdf: 945018 bytes, checksum: 9fdf4d6c357b3ae366c961b5ff8ed029 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-06-20 / The present dissertation discusses the character Nora Helmer of Henrik Ibsen’s play “Doll’s House”, written in 1879, through an artistic and cultural history point of view, in a multidisciplinary bias, where the character development in the mentioned work points to a dialogue between the Nineteenth Century and contemporaneity, contributing in the illustration of women’s actions in the construction of hers historical becoming. / A presente dissertação discute a personagem Nora Helmer da obra teatral “Casa de Bonecas” de Henrik Ibsen, escrita em 1879, através de um ponto de vista artístico e histórico cultural num viés multidisciplinar, onde o desenvolvimento da personagem na referida obra aponta para um diálogo entre o Século XIX e a contemporaneidade, contribuindo na ilustração das ações das mulheres na construção de seu devir histórico.

This master’s thesis discusses who Nora Helmer could be today in different parts of the world. With an idea for an modern adaptation of A doll house (with three Noras from different cultural perspectives) as a starting point the purpose is to research the following questions: Who Nora could be today, how Nora could be portrayed through different cultural perspectives, what similarities and differences there are, if anything in the play has to be changed to relate to a contemporary context and what the essence of Nora is. These questions are being explored through in-depth interviews with five different female actors in different continents: North America, Asia, Oceania, Africa and Europe. The actors thoughts are presented through different themes: Who Nora is, motherhood and marriage, Nora’s favourite color, the ideal woman and who Nora could be in their context today. The last part discusses the different versions of Nora, how a classical play can open up for conversations about current gender equality issues and how this material can be used in the continued work towards a stage production.