Orientador: Guita Grin Debert / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-17T07:21:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ferreira_MariaPatriciaCorrea_D.pdf: 933694 bytes, checksum: 307fc421c8a0a6eb08df1b3a2bee80bf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 / Resumo: Esta tese focaliza as lógicas argumentativas dos discursos que regem as sentenças judiciais, baseadas em elementos socioculturais, valores morais e nas atribuições sociais de pais e filhos postos em ação por advogados, promotores e juízes nos processos de parricídio. Por meio da análise de conteúdo dos processos penais, julgados na cidade de São Paulo entre os anos de 1990 a 2002, mostrou-se como são produzidos tipos ideais de relações familiares e quais são os estereótipos e preconceitos acionados na construção das imagens das vítimas e dos acusados. De modo a dar inteligibilidade aos crimes, essas construções articulam representações simbólicas de relações de poder, afeto, responsabilidade, concebendo a família como palco de relações autoritárias e de complementaridade. O que se evidencia é a complexa relação entre o papel da Justiça Criminal em punir exemplarmente os filhos que cometeram os crimes e a tendência em absolver e relativizar o grau de culpabilidade dos acusados ao reconhecerem implicitamente e/ou estrategicamente que mais importante do que punir um filho suspeito de parricídio é levar em conta as reivindicações e o julgamento sobre o autor do crime feito pelos próprios parentes das vítimas e dos acusados / Abstract: This thesis focuses on the logic of judicial discourse in parricide cases. It deals with the socio-cultural elements, moral values and social roles attributed to parents and sons by lawyers, prosecutors and judges involved in this kind of criminal lawsuit. The work analyses parricide cases in the city of São Paulo (Brazil), between 1990 and 2002, revealing the construction of ideal familiar relationships and the stereotypes and prejudices employed to portray the victims and the accused. These images connect symbolic representations of power, affection and responsibility, producing a notion of family as a place characterized by authoritarian and complementary relationships. This research stresses the complex relation between the role played by the criminal justice, as the responsible for punishing exemplarily the sons, and the inclination to absolve or mitigate the sentences, admitting that more important than punishing the accused is to acknowledge the demands and judgments of the suspect relatives and of the suspect him/herself / Doutorado / Antropologia Social / Doutor em Ciências Sociais

Esta dissertação tem por objeto as narrativas emergentes a partir de um caso de assassinato ocorrido em Ouro Preto/MG em 14 de outubro de 2001, o caso Aline, que teve repercussão nacional ao ser representado com características de mistério e barbárie, tecendo uma teia de relações causais com diferentes elementos drogas, festas estudantis, satanismo e, em especial, jogos de interpretação de papeis (RPGs). A partir da noção de drama social de Victor Turner, analisa-se a ruptura do cotidiano de Ouro Preto com o crime, abrindo fissuras para a emergência de metáforas radicais de sacrifício e crucificação, que energizam a leitura do crime como ritual macabro. Analisam-se a evolução do processo e o julgamento dos acusados, o encontro de narrativas e o desfecho dissonante das expectativas punitivas. Em seguida, acompanha-se a produção de narrativas dominantes e o escalonamento dos conflitos do caso Aline para as arenas narrativas midiáticas, mágico-religiosas e jurídico-políticas. Discutem-se as expectativas de justiça e punição por meio da análise de linchamento moral e da busca por vítimas sacrificais, unindo-as com uma discussão sobre racionalidade penal moderna que permite questionar a aporia formada pela absolvição. Por fim, tecem-se algumas considerações sobre a produção de ordens e desordens no ritual do júri e o que poderia ser uma narrativa justa do caso Aline. / This dissertation analyzes the rising narratives of a murder case occurred in Ouro Preto/MG in October 14, 2001, the Aline case. This case was nationwide known due to the mystery and cruelty with which it was represented, weaving a web of causal relations with several elements drugs, student parties, Satanism and Roleplaying Games (RPGs). Victor Turners notion of social drama is engaged to analyze how the crime creates a breach in Ouro Preto everyday life, opening cracks for the arouse of root metaphors of sacrifice and crucifixion, that energizes the crime reading as a macabre ritual. The evolution of the process and the defendants trial are discussed as a narrative gathering with an unexpected non-punitive outcome. The crystallization of dominant narratives and the escalating conflicts of Aline case are followed to the media, magical-religious and juridical-political arenas. Then the expectations of justice and punishment are discussed, through an analyze of the moral lynching and the search of a escape goat, and also a discussion of the modern penal rationality, that enables questions on the aporia created by the defendants discharge. At last, some considerations on Jury ritual creations of order and disorder and of what could be a just narrative of Aline case.

The current research sought to clarify the diverging relationships between counterfactual thinking and hindsight bias observed in the literature thus far. In a non-legal context, Roese and Olson (1996) found a positive relationship between counterfactuals and hindsight bias, such that counterfactual mutations that undid the outcome also increased participants’ ratings of the outcome’s a priori likelihood. Further, they determined that this relationship is mediated by causal attributions about the counterfactually mutated antecedent event. Conversely, in the context of a civil lawsuit, Robbennolt and Sobus (1997) found that the relationship between counterfactual thinking and hindsight bias is negative. The current research sought to resolve the conflicting findings in the literature within a legal context. In Experiment One, the manipulation of the normality of the defendant’s target behavior, designed to manipulate participants’ counterfactual thoughts about said behavior, did moderate the hindsight effect of outcome knowledge on mock jurors’ judgments of the foreseeability of that outcome as well as their negligence verdicts. Although I predicted that counterfactual thinking would increase, or exacerbate, the hindsight bias, as found by Roese and Olson (1996), my results provided some support for Robbenolt and Sobus’s (1997) finding that counterfactual thinking decreases the hindsight bias. Behavior normality did not moderate the hindsight effect of outcome knowledge in Experiment Two, nor did causal proximity in Experiment Three. Additionally, my hypothesis that self-referencing may be an effective hindsight debiasing technique received little support across the three experiments. Although both the self-referencing instructions and self-report measure consistently decreased mock jurors’ likelihood of finding the defendant negligent, and self-referencing instructions decreased their foreseeability ratings in studies two and three, the self-referencing manipulation did not interact with outcome knowledge to moderate a hindsight bias effect on either foreseeability or negligence judgments. The consistent pattern of results across the three experiments, however, suggests that self-referencing may be an effective technique in reducing the likelihood of negligence verdicts.

Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T18:18:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao_Alexandre_Soares_Bartilotti.pdf: 856499 bytes, checksum: b881ccf32be2d4d0a1d7171db670925c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-10-01 / The incident of repetitive demands resolution is an innovation introduced in the draft of the new code of civil procedure. According to legal provision, that institute aims to identify demands of mass with identical question of law that can be repeated indefinitely before patriotic courts. Identified these causes, fleeing the individual tradition of each undergo a procedure of individual judgment, the solution will be presented in a collectivizedly where the decision handed down by the court will apply to all other demands repetitive. Through a procedure initiated directly in the second degree, legitimate or magistrate office, require the affectation of the case to repetitive prosecution whose jurisdiction belong to a special organ of the Court, and, once admitting the procedure, other similar cases will be suspended until the judgment by the Court, of the matter of law in dispute. Speaking the Court, the decision given in that particular case will serve for all other cases with the same legal controversy. The decision given by the Court, will bind all monocratic magistrates who will decide in the same direction for all cases so far suspended as well, whenever the question is repeated in the judiciary. This procedure aims to minimize the enormous quantity of repetitive processes, judged on a case throughout the judiciary, allowing greater saving time to the magistrates in order to address it on specific issues or complexity worthy of individual treatment. The study to be done aims to identify the phenomenon of mass litigation and verify the failure of the individually and collectively process in order to address it. Later, we will study about a new vision of this process in the phenomenon of mass demands and application of precedent in Brazilian law because of the proximity of our system with the common law. Finally, we will analyze the incident and novel techniques in trial group he made. / O incidente de resolução de demandas repetitivas consiste numa inovação trazida no anteprojeto do novo código de processo civil. Segundo previsão legal, o novel instituto objetiva identificar demandas de massa com idêntica questão de direito que possam repetir-se ilimitadamente perante os tribunais pátrios. Identificadas tais causas, fugindo da tradição individual de cada uma ser submetida a um procedimento individual de julgamento, a solução será apresentada de forma coletivizada onde a decisão prolatada pelo órgão jurisdicional será aplicada para todas as demais demandas repetitivas. Através de um procedimento instaurado diretamente no segundo grau, os legitimados ou o magistrado de ofício, requererão a afetação do processo ao procedimento de julgamento repetitivo cuja competência pertencerá a um órgão especial do Tribunal, e, uma vez admitindo o procedimento, os demais processos idênticos, serão suspensos até o julgamento, pelo Tribunal, da matéria de direito objeto da controvérsia. Pronunciando-se o Tribunal, a decisão dada naquele caso em concreto servirá para todos os demais casos com a mesma controvérsia jurídica. A decisão dada pelo Tribunal vinculará todos os magistrados monocráticos que decidirão no mesmo sentido para todos os processos até então suspensos, bem como, toda vez que a questão se repetir no judiciário. Tal procedimento objetiva minimizar o enorme quantitativo de processos repetitivos, julgados caso a caso em todo o judiciário, possibilitando uma maior economia de tempo aos magistrados para debruçarem-se sobre questões específicas ou de grande complexidade merecedoras de tratamento individual. O estudo a ser desenvolvido no presente trabalho pretende identificar o fenômeno da litigiosidade de massa e verificar a insuficiência do processo individual e coletivo para enfrentá-lo. Posteriormente será feito um estudo sobre uma nova visão do devido processo legal no fenômeno das demandas de massa e a aplicação do precedente jurisprudencial no direito brasileiro devido a proximidade do nosso sistema com o common law. Por fim, será analisado o novel incidente e as técnicas de julgamento em grupo por ele introduzidas.

The current case involves a female rape victim. Research has shown the level of victim blaming can be elevated if the victim is a lesbian woman compared to a heterosexual woman. Mock jurors’ responses to personality trait questionnaires (e.g., Belief in a Just World, Attitudes Toward Women, Attitudes Toward Lesbians) and amount of contact they have with homosexual people were employed as predictors of how they would decide victim blaming and perpetrator guilt. Personality trait findings were not good predictors; however, greater contact with homosexuals did decrease negative attitudes toward lesbian victims. Limitations and implications for future research are addressed.

Mitt examensarbete handlar om övningsprovspelningar. Syftet med mitt arbete har varit att undersöka hur mitt spel påverkas under en provspelningssituation då jag blir nervös. Jag har i mitt arbete genomfört fem olika övningsprovspelningar och fått kritik och kommentarer från en jury bestående av hornklassen på Kungliga Musikhögskolan. Vid varje tillfälle har jag spelat fem olika orkesterutdrag. Under tiden mellan varje övningsprovspelning har jag läst igenom kritiken och försökt förbättra mitt spel till nästa övningsprovspelning. Jag har på förhand kommit överens med juryn om att begränsa kritiken till att handla om vanliga musikaliska aspekter som rytm, tempo, klang, dynamik, artikulation, intonation och karaktär. Därefter har jag jämfört all kritik som jag har fått och sett vilken kritik som har varit återkommande vid varje övningsprovspelning, trots att jag har försökt förbättra mitt resultat mellan tillfällena. Efter att ha analyserat kritiken kan jag dra slutsatsen att de flesta aspekter i mitt spel försämras i pressade provspelningssituationer då jag blir nervös. Mitt resultat och mina slutsatser kommer att vara till hjälp för mig inför framtida provspelningar och konserter. / <p>Mikael Larsson och Joel Jaakkola genomförde en gemensam examenskonsert i Nathan Milstein-salen den 24 maj 2021 19:00. Konsertprogram: Canto Serioso, Carl Nielsen (Mikael Larsson) 2 Stücke, Op. 28: No. 1. Lied, Leone Sinigaglia (Mikael Larsson) Horn Sonata in F Major, Op. 17., Ludwig van Beethoven (Joel Jaakkola) Thema und Variationen, Op. 13, Franz Strauss (Mikael Larsson) Horn Concerto in A Major, Op. 28, Kurt Atterberg (Joel Jaakkola) Blåskvintett, Op. 43, Carl Nielsen (Mikael Larsson) Medverkande musiker: Mikael Larsson, Joel Jaakkola, valthorn, Johan Ullen, piano, Kajsa Nilsson, flöjt, My Svenman, oboe och engelskt horn, Maria Victoria Fernandez Caballero, klarinett, Ciaran Hayes, fagott.</p>

Uppsatsen har fokus på färdighetsprovet vid gymnasiets estetiska program, inriktning trummor. Undersökningen ämnar synliggöra de innehållsmässiga moment som återfinns i en provspelning, samt hur slagverkslärare, tillika jurymedlemmar, bedömer och ser på de sökande och det som framförs. Lärare, och framtida lärare ges en inblick i sökningsförfarandets sammanhang, innehåll och miljö. Framtida sökande kan även de ta del av uppsatsen, för att lättare kunna prioritera rätt saker och förhoppningsvis känna sig säkrare inför en stundande provspelning. I innehållet återfinns tips på hur man som sökande kan behöva förbereda sig inför en sökning, samt vilka val man eventuellt kan behöva göra. De konkreta tipsen återfinns i bilaga 2. Studien genomfördes genom en intervju i fokusgrupp med tre stycken trumlärare inom gymnasiets estetiska program. Denna intervju hade till stor del formen av en diskussion och spelades in för att senare återges i skrift och därefter analyseras. Resultatet visar att färdighetsprovet i trummor till viss del ser olika ut på de olika skolorna. Innehållet varierar något, likaså tiden för provet, samt vilken metod och strategi man använder för poängsättning. Resonemanget kring kunskap och utvecklingsmöjligheter har däremot många gemensamma nämnare, och en helhetssyn vid poängsättning brukas av informanterna på alla tre skolor. De sökande kan dock få olika poäng beroende på vilken skola de gör färdighetsprov på, då olika strategier för poängsättning brukas. Skolans inriktning och bedömningskriterier styr till viss del vad man som lärare och jurymedlem bedömer och ser som viktigt, men varje jurymedlems bakgrund, erfarenhet och ideal har en betydande roll i processen. Som sökande kan det vara bra att fundera på vad man vill med musiken och sedan söka sig till den skola som speglar ens mål och inriktning bäst.Undersökningen berör ämnen som färdighetsprovets innehåll och juryns sammansättning, bidrar med insikter gällande tillvägagångssätt, samt visar på tankar och problematik kring bedömning. Lärare som söker stöd för sina argument, önskar sätta ihop, eller utveckla ett färdighetsprov kan med fördel ta del av detta arbete.

Anecdotal evidence supports the belief among indigent individuals who are assigned defense counsel that they would be better represented by privately retained counsel. This perspective jeopardizes attorney effectiveness by reducing communication and trust between the attorney and client. Research on the effectiveness of counsel is sparse. The purpose of this quantitative study was to bridge this gap in knowledge by comparing the effectiveness of privately retained and publicly appointed counsel between 2008 and 2013, both before and after the imposition of state-wide compensation limitations on publicly appointed defense counsel. The theoretical framework was Stuntz's theory, which stresses that one part of the criminal justice system will be compensated for elsewhere in the system. Research questions focused on the success rates of publicly funded and privately retained counsel in jury trials in a large state district court in New England. Data were collected from court records and analyzed using tests of proportions and a binary logistic regression to determine the success rates of the types of counsel and whether appointed counsels' relative effectiveness changed after the compensation limitations were imposed in 2011. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in acquittal rates between counsel groups or for either counsel group before and after the imposition of the statewide compensation limits. Implications for positive social change include educating defendants on the effectiveness of publicly appointed counsel to enhance the trust within these attorney-client relationships, and improving the quality of discourse in legislative deliberations focused on weighing budget cuts to appointed counsel compensation with the risk to the fair administration of justice.

No description available.

No description available.