In this thesis, public housing was investigated with particular reference to the nature of communication between the landlord and tenant. It focussed on interactive behaviours and the incidence of litigation. The study attempts to bridge the gap between social theory and social practice through the application of existing social theory in the description and analyses of social problems. Based on a critical review of the relevant literature, the characteristics of communicative interaction and human relationships are described, together with the history of housing provision and the growth of litigation to resolve issues in public housing. Research of communicative interaction in the housing sector in general and the landlord-tenant interaction in particular has been a neglected area of research that is addressed in this thesis. An initial study surveyed both tenants and housing officers in the Sydney metropolitan area. Social analysis focuses on local interaction between landlord and tenant and how these local interactions expand into global patterns. The thesis analyses how power-relating, ideological/evaluative and ethical choices of housing officers and tenants influence their communicative interaction and the subsequent access and distribution of services and resources in the public housing sector. The theoretical framework explicates on complex responsive processes (CRP) perspective. CRP is a process theory that looks into the simultaneous and co-influencing relationship between the individual and the social and multi-agency approach in social analysis. The conceptualising framework relies on the application of this theory and the principles of Humanity, human rights and social justice to achieve a dialogical communicative interaction. The thesis applied complementary quantitative and qualitative methods where a quantitative study of a small population was conducted using structured interviews and group meetings to guide the qualitative research. The population was identified by natural experiment, i.e., identification of two populations in a public housing estate: a Participative group, comprising tenants who had consciously participated in the housing authorities?? renewal programs, and a Non-participative group of tenants who had not taken part in the Tenant Participation programs by Housing New South Wales (HNSW). The housing officers and tenants were identified using snowball and quota sampling. The findings reveal a conspicuous absence of research that focus on local interaction between housing officers and tenants in public housing. The study confirms the anti-dialogical nature of communicative interaction in public housing, which is iterated, sustained and perpetuated by the use of litigation, a mechanism that is increasingly being preferred to settle disputes, by both landlord and tenant.

La diversité des ordres juridiques, ainsi que leur multiplication, ont engendré un besoin croissant d'articulation entre eux. Les seuls mécanismes de coordination ne suffisent plus et s'accompagnent désormais de méthodes d'interaction plus active, durant l'instance et à l'issue de l'instance, formant un tout qu'est le phénomène de coopération judiciaire. Derrière l'analyse de la diversité des méthodes de coopération employées dans l'ordre international (commission rogatoire, notification des actes de procès à l'étranger, extradition, exequatur), et dans l'ordre européen mû par le principe de reconnaissance mutuelle (mandat d'arrêt européen, reconnaissance des décisions civiles et pénales, décision d'enquête européenne), l'étude révèle une unité profonde de la notion de coopération. Les critères de celle-ci, analysée comme un acte de procès, accompli librement par un ordre juridique, à la demande d'un autre, pour les besoins d'une procédure relevant de l'ordre juridique requérant, permettent de remonter à son essence. Elle est un processus d'aide réciproque, fondé sur la réciprocité et dont la finalité de résolution d'un litige transfrontalier dicte les offices respectifs des juges requérant et requis. / The diversity of legal orders and their multiplication have led to a growing need to articulate them. Mechanisms of coordination are no longer sufficient and are complemented by more active methods of interaction both during proceedings in court and upon their completion, thus forming an integral whole, known as the phenomenon of judicial cooperation. Behind the analysis of the diversity of the methods of cooperation that are implemented in the international order (letters rogatory, service of process, extradition, exequatur) and in the European order by virtue of the principle of mutual recognition (European arrest warrant, recognition of civil and criminal judgments, European investigation order), the thesis reveals a prefound unity of the notion of judicial cooperation. Its criteria, analysed as procedural act, free/y accomplished by one legal order upon the request of another, for the needs of judicial proceedings pending before or ended in the requesting legal order, allow to trace the essence of judicial cooperation. At the core of judicial cooperation lies the process of mutual aid, based on reciprocity for the purposes of resolving a transborder litigation, and which defines respective powers of the requesting and the requested judge.

Peacebuilding efforts are ongoing around the globe today. However, in societies that have transitioned out of conflict and have a strong judiciary, potential exists to use innovative techniques to assist in those efforts. Termed divided societies, these countries which have conflict simmering under the surface may benefit from public interest litigation as a tool for peacebuilding in the region. As peacebuilding and public interest litigation share many of the same goals, litigation may be able to assist the society to more sustainably transition from a culture of conflict to a culture of peace. This paper details current scholarship on public interest litigation, peacebuilding, and post-conflict reconstruction, provides research findings of best practices for litigating from Northern Ireland and South Africa, and discusses the efficacy and limitations of public interest litigation as a tool for peacebuilding.

[pt] Este estudo refaz, num primeiro momento, o percurso do serviço social na justiça de família do Rio de Janeiro, desde a perspectiva normativa, que marcou o início da inserção da profissão no judiciário, até os nossos dias. Tendo como referência a prática profissional da autora no campo em análise, o resgate histórico aponta para um redirecionamento do serviço social, acompanhando as mudanças na legislação. Num segundo momento, a pesquisa focaliza as famílias que litigam na justiça, tendo como perspectiva as transformações ocorridas na organização familiar, nas últimas décadas. Ao abordar as famílias em litígio no contexto de transformações sociais mais amplas, propõe a ruptura com os padrões normativos que marcaram a prática do serviço social com famílias. O resgate da fala de pais e mães que buscam a justiça ante os impasses surgidos após processos de separação ou ruptura permite vislumbrar em que medida estes mesmos impasses refletem as transformações contemporâneas que afetam os fundamentos do laço familiar. Assim sendo, a postura normativa que marcou o serviço social cede lugar à perspectiva da garantia de direitos, que hoje caracteriza a profissão. / [en] Initiallly, this study retraces the path of Social Work in family courts in Rio de Janeiro, since the times of the normative perspective, that first marked the insertion of the profession in the Judiciary, up to the present time. Having as fieldwork the professional practice of the author, the historical acccount points to new directions for Social Work practice, in line with changes taking place in legislation. In a second step, the research focuses on families that litigate in the courts, having in perspective the changes that took place in family organization over the last decades. When approaching families in litigation in the context of broader social changes the study proposes a break-up with the normative standards that have characterized family Social Work. By capturing the speech of fathers and mothers that look for the courts in the face of impasses occurring after separation processes, the study helps to unveil to what extent these very same impasses reflect contemporary changes that affect the foundations of family ties. As such, the normative approach that has marked Social Work yields in the face of a perspective that favors the guarantee of rights that presently characterizes the profession.

Submitted by Jamile Barbosa da Cruz (jamile.cruz@ucsal.br) on 2016-09-14T19:38:21Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Costa JUNIOR, VLP-2016.pdf: 1582818 bytes, checksum: af8cccd25d84c206747e48883eb24a42 (MD5) / Rejected by Rosemary Magalhães (rosemary.magalhaes@ucsal.br), reason: PALAVRAS-CHAVE on 2016-09-21T22:01:20Z (GMT) / Submitted by Jamile Barbosa da Cruz (jamile.cruz@ucsal.br) on 2016-09-29T17:40:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Costa JUNIOR, VLP-2016.pdf: 1582818 bytes, checksum: af8cccd25d84c206747e48883eb24a42 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Maria Emília Carvalho Ribeiro (maria.ribeiro@ucsal.br) on 2016-11-22T20:57:40Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Costa JUNIOR, VLP-2016.pdf: 1582818 bytes, checksum: af8cccd25d84c206747e48883eb24a42 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-11-22T20:57:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Costa JUNIOR, VLP-2016.pdf: 1582818 bytes, checksum: af8cccd25d84c206747e48883eb24a42 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-31 / As modificações nas estruturas sociais, políticas, legais e, sobretudo, econômicas, no contexto da acumulação flexível resultaram em mudanças significativas na prestação de serviço da advocacia. A expansão do consumo em massa e padronizado, a desestatização de serviços essenciais, bem como a explosão de faculdades de Direito no Brasil, sobretudo a partir da década de 1990, marcada pelo avanço da agenda neoliberal, fizeram surgir um tipo de organização da advocacia denominada de contencioso de massa. Os escritórios deste setor de serviços jurídicos se dedicam ao patrocínio de acentuado volume de ações, em regra, simples, de matéria jurídica repetitiva, com valores de causa e honorários relativamente modestos, principalmente por tramitarem nos Juizados Especiais de Defesa do Consumidor. O objetivo do estudo consistiu em evidenciar a nova morfologia que abalou os pilares da profissão jurídica nos escritórios do contencioso de massa, suas causas e consequências. Em especial, mostra a indelével correlação entre este tipo de organização e a precariedade do trabalho, que atinge, principalmente, o jovem. O estudo considera jovem o advogado entre 20 e 30 anos, que tenha até 5 anos de inscrição na OAB, utilizando como marco temporal os anos de 2009 a 2014. Ademais, restringiu-se aos profissionais que trabalham para os escritórios que defendem empresas nos Juizados Especiais de Defesa do Consumidor, em Salvador, Bahia. Para conhecer o objeto, a pesquisa utilizou a revisão bibliográfica, análise documental e entrevistas semiestruturadas, feitas com advogados que se enquadram no perfil da análise. Os dados colhidos identificaram que a viabilidade operacional da advocacia massificada depende da automação do processo produtivo, do trabalho simples e repetitivo, mal remunerado, com jornadas extenuantes, vínculos flexíveis, terceirizados e inseguros, mazelas agravadas pela saturação de profissionais no mercado laboral, fenômenos que conduzem as variadas dimensões do trabalho precário. O panorama adverso atinge principalmente o jovem, que, encontra no contencioso de massa uma das poucas vias de acesso a mercado de trabalho. Nesta esteira, o enfrentamento do tema foi essencial para transpor a cortina de fumaça que concebe o advogado como profissional liberal, imune ao processo de precariedade, desvelando o inóspito cenário produtivo dos escritórios do contencioso de massa e íntima relação com a hostilidade laboral que subjuga o jovem advogado. / The modifications in the social, political, legal and above all economic structures in the context of flexible accumulation resulted in significant changes in the lawyers’ work. The expansion of standardized mass consumption, the privatization of essential services, as well as the boom of Law Schools in Brazil, mainly in the 1990’s, marked by the advance of the neoliberal agenda, made arise a new kind of lawyering organization called mass litigation. The offices of this sector of juridical services take on a large number of lawsuits. As a rule, they are simple, of a repetitive nature, with low values and relatively modest fees, mainly because they run in the Special Courts of Consumers’ Protection. The goal of this study was to evidence the new morphology that rocked the pillars of the juridical profession in the mass litigation offices, its causes and consequences. It especially shows the indelible correlation between these kinds of organization and the precariousness of the work, that strikes mainly the young. The study takes into consideration the lawyer who is from 20 to 30 years old and who has had a license to practice law for at most 5 years. The temporal mark was from 2009 to 2014. Furthermore, it was restricted to the ones who work for offices that represent companies in the Special Courts of Consumers’ Protection of Salvador, Bahia. To acknowledge the object, the research used literature review, document analysis and semi-structured interviews of the lawyers who fit the profile. The data identified that the operational feasibility of the mass litigation depends on the automation of the productive process. It also depends on the simple and repetitive work that is ill-paid and has exhaustive work hours. This kind of bond is flexible, uncertain and outsourced. All of those are aggravated by the saturation of professionals in the job market. These phenomena lead to various dimensions of precarious labor. The adverse overview strikes mainly the young, who find in the mass litigation one of the few ways to access the job market. Thus, facing this theme was essential to surpass the smoke curtain that sees the lawyer as a liberal professional who is immune to the precariousness process. It revealed the inhospitable productive scenery of the offices of mass litigation and the intimate relation with the labor hostility that subjugates the young lawyer.

Pretende-se abordar o tema da litigiosidade de massa e da agregação processual no sistema jurídico brasileiro, de forma comparada ao sistema jurídico estadunidense. Trata-se de apurar: qual é o nível ótimo de agregação processual, sem prejuízo à autonomia do indivíduo em contar a sua própria história? O que agregar e como agregar? Esse é o objetivo da presente investigação: aferir qual a extensão, necessária e adequada, da agregação processual nas controvérsias de massa e, ainda, seus respectivos limites no direito processual civil. A tese foi dividida em três seções fundamentais: (i) a primeira seção aborda a história da litigiosidade de massa e as técnicas (de larga escala) de agregação processual; (ii) a segunda seção enfrenta a temática da agregação processual à luz das controvérsias plurissubjetivas, diante dos diversos graus de interdependência substancial (grau de variância que se tolera entre os membros do grupo para admitir a agregação processual). O objetivo é que seja possível reconhecer as características dos interesses ou direitos que transcendem a esfera individual e; (iii) a terceira seção aborda o tema da representatividade adequada e das garantias constitucionais processuais, estabelecendo as premissas para a vinculação dos membros ausentes do grupo à questão comum decidida no procedimento agregado. E, por fim, examinam-se as técnicas de preclusão no sistema jurídico brasileiro e no sistema jurídico estadunidense, condicionando-as ao resultado da argumentação realizada no procedimento agregado e ao ônus ou carga da argumentação. / In this work, we research the issue concerning mass disputes and aggregate litigation in the Brazilian legal system, compared to the U.S. legal system. The problem is to determine: what is the optimal level of aggregation, without prejudice to the individual autonomy? What is going to be aggregate? And how? That\'s the goal of this research: assessing the extent appropriate in aggregation of mass disputes and also their limits in civil proceedings. The thesis has been divided into three main sections: (i) the first section covers the history of mass disputes and the techniques (large-scale) of aggregate litigation, (ii) the second section faces the issue of aggregation in the light of various degrees of substantial interdependence: how much variance among class members\' circumstances should courts tolerate. The aim is to be able to recognize the characteristics of rights that transcend the individual level, and (iii) the third section addresses the issue of adequate representation and procedural constitutional guarantees, establishing the premises for binding absent members of the group. And finally, it approaches the preclusion doctrine in the aggregate litigation, conditioning it to the result of the argument made in the aggregate procedure and the burden of persuasion (showing a good reason).

O objetivo do trabalho é identificar os limites da atuação jurisdicional nas sentenças determinativas, aqui compreendidas as em que cabe ao juiz indicar o objeto, a extensão ou o modo de exercício de posição jurídica de vantagem (direito subjetivo individual ou coletivo, poder etc) em consonância com as circunstâncias do caso. O trabalho se divide em 3 partes. Na primeira, apresenta-se a trajetória histórica dessa categoria de sentenças, desde o início do século XX até os dias atuais, dando ênfase às contribuições dos autores alemães, italianos e brasileiros para o tema. Na segunda, a partir das principais ideias levantadas na primeira, o autor expõe suas próprias concepções acerca da categoria. São apontados o conceito de sentenças determinativas, fornecidos casos em que ocorrem, indicada a técnica empregada pelo legislador para viabilizar-lhes a produção. São ainda estabelecidas as relações entre as sentenças determinativas e temas correlatos, como as sentenças de equidade, a discricionariedade judicial, e com as sentenças constitutivas, condenatórias e declaratórias. Na terceira parte são analisados os limites da atuação jurisdicional nas sentenças determinativas, dando-se ênfase ao estudo das medidas que podem impostas pelo juiz para realização das posições jurídicas de vantagem (direito subjetivo individual ou coletivo, poder etc) reconhecidas no processo, cujo objeto ou modo de exercício não é previamente determinado em lei. Partindo-se da premissa de que o processo deve dar, quanto for possível praticamente, a quem tenha um direito, tudo aquilo e exatamente aquilo que ele tenha direito de conseguir (CHIOVENDA), conclui-se que ao juiz deve ordenar as medidas concretamente adequadas a realização dessas posições jurídicas de vantagem, sendo-lhe vedado, porém, impor as expressamente vedadas pela ordem jurídica e aquelas que a contrariem, numa perspectiva sistemática (vedação a medidas contrárias à dignidade humana e à separação de poderes, por exemplo). Por fim, para controle de eventuais abusos judiciais, enfatiza-se a necessidade de que da motivação da sentença conste claramente as razões determinantes da decisão por ele adotada. / The objective of the thesis is to identify the limits of the judicial role in the determinative sentences, here understood as sentences in which the judge indicates the object, extent or manner of exercise of a legal position of advantage (right, legal power etc. ), in accordance with the circumstances of the case. The work is divided into 3 parts. The first presents the historical trajectory of this category of sentences, since the early twentieth century to the present day, emphasizing the contributions of the Germans, Italians and Brazilians authors to the subject. In the second part, from the main ideas raised in the first one, the author exposes his own conceptions of the category. It is pointed out the concept of determinative sentences, provided cases that then occur and explained the legal technique used to enable them. It is also established the relations between determinative sentences and related topics, such as sentences of equity, judicial discretion, constitutive, condemnatory and declaratory sentences. The third part reviews the limits of the judicial power in the determinative sentences, stressing the kinds of orders that may be imposed by the judge to perform the legal positions of advantage (right, legal power etc) recognized through the action, whose objective or manner of exercise is not predetermined by the law. Assuming that \"the process should provide the winner, as nearly as possible, everything he is entitled to get\" (CHIOVENDA), it can be concluded that the judge shall order the measures specifically suited to carry out these legal positions of advantage, and that he is forbidden to impose measures expressly prohibited by the law and those that contradict it in a systemic sense (prohibition of measures contrary to human dignity and the separation of powers, for example). At last, in order to control judicial abuses, it is emphasized that the sentence should state clearly the real reasons for the decision adopted by the judge.

O objeto da dissertação é a hipoteca judiciária. O mote que inspirou o trabalho foi a preocupação com a efetividade do processo. Partiu-se do postulado de que o processo não deve ser um instrumento de mera declaração de direitos. Deve, ao revés, viabilizar a alteração da realidade, de modo que, ao final do processo, o jurisdicionado exerça seu direito tal como teria exercido se a correspondente obrigação tivesse sido cumprida espontaneamente. A matéria carece de obras específicas. Salvo alguns poucos artigos, é tratada nos manuais de direito civil e de direito processual civil como assunto de importância nenhuma ou secundária. Embora se trate de direito real de garantia, a circunstância de nascer em razão de um fato processual e com a finalidade de fomentar a efetividade do processo firma-nos a convicção de que o assunto deve ser tratado no âmbito do Direito Processual Civil. Cremos que a ausência de disposição legal a respeito do tema no Código Civil de 2002, eliminando, assim, a exclusão do direito de preferência da hipoteca judiciária, longe de torná-la obsoleta, aumentou a importância do instituto. O primeiro capítulo propõe enquadrar a hipoteca judiciária como instrumento de exercício do direito constitucional à efetividade da tutela jurisdicional. O segundo capítulo reúne as características principais do direito real de hipoteca. O terceiro capítulo contém a evolução histórica da hipoteca judiciária. O quarto capítulo traz notícias sobre a hipoteca judiciária nos ordenamentos jurídicos de Portugal e Itália, com as respectivas semelhanças e diferenças em relação ao modo como o instituto é regrado no ordenamento pátrio. O quinto e sexto capítulos referem-se à natureza jurídica da hipoteca judiciária e sua diferença em relação a institutos com os quais, por vezes, é confundida: a ineficácia da alienação ou oneração de bens em fraude à execução, a tutela cautelar, a tutela executiva, a antecipação de tutela e a hipoteca legal. O sétimo capítulo estuda os requisitos necessários à constituição da hipoteca judiciária: (i) decisão jurisdicional, (ii) reconhecimento de obrigação de pagar, dar, fazer ou não fazer (sem necessidade de preceito condenatório), (iii) contraditório prévio e (iv) proporcionalidade. O oitavo capítulo refere-se às especificidades da hipoteca judiciária gerada com base em sentenças proferidas em ação coletiva, ação popular, dissídio individual trabalhista, arbitragem, por autoridades estrangeiras. Destacamos, nesse capítulo, a defesa de que a decisão interlocutória, dependendo de seu conteúdo, gera hipoteca judiciária. O nono capítulo foi reservado ao estudo da hipoteca judiciária no contexto do processo, como, por exemplo, o fato de que não compõe o objeto do processo, nem está sujeita à preclusão. O décimo capítulo trata da competência para especializar e ordenar o registro da hipoteca judiciária, bem como o meio pelo qual o registro deve ser feito. Sublinha-se, aqui, a discussão sobre o fundamento em razão do qual o efeito suspensivo recursal não deve impedir a constituição da hipoteca judiciária. O décimo primeiro capítulo contém os bens que podem e os que não podem ser objeto de hipoteca judiciária, com a proposição, de lege ferenda, de que alguns bens possam ser objeto de penhor judiciário. O décimo segundo e o décimo terceiro capítulo contém o estudo do direito de preferência que, segundo se propôs, é gerado pela hipoteca judiciária, tratando-o, primeiramente, de forma geral e, depois, no concurso comum e nos concursos especiais de credores (falência, insolvência civil, liquidação extrajudicial e recuperação). O décimo terceiro capítulo contém as conclusões do trabalho. No décimo quarto capítulo, há crítica ao texto que foi aprovado no Senado para substituir o artigo 466 do Código de Processo Civil atual. Finalmente, o décimo quinto capítulo contém a bibliografia referenciada. / The object of this dissertation is the mortgage created by the law to assure the accomplishment of obligations recognized jurisdictionally (judicial mortgage). The motto that inspired the thesis was the concern about the effectiveness of the process. This started from the premise that the process should not be a mere instrument of rights declaration. Must, in reverse, enabling the alteration of reality, so that, by the end of the process, the creditor exercise its right as would have exercised if the corresponding obligation had been fulfilled spontaneously. The matter requires specific works. Except a few articles, is treated in manuals of civil law and civil procedural law as a matter of no importance or secondary. Although it is substantive right (of guaranty), the circumstance of being born from a procedural fact and in order to promote the effectiveness of process conducts to the conviction that the judicial mortgage shall be dealt by litigation doctrine. The absence of legal provision on the subject in the Brazilian Civil Code, thus eliminating the exclusion of preference right of judicial mortgage, far from making it obsolete, increased the institute importance. The first chapter proposes catalogue the judicial mortgage as a tool for exercising the constitutional right to effective judicial protection. The second chapter brings together the main characteristics of the right of mortgage. The third chapter contains its historical evolution. The fourth chapter contains a record of how the mortgage is regulated in Portugal and Italy. The fifth and sixth chapters relate to the legal nature of the judicial mortgage and its difference from the institutes with which it sometimes is mistaken: the ineffectiveness of alienation or lien in fraud, injunction, foreclosure, motion in limine and legal mortgage. The seventh chapter examines the requirements necessary to constitute the judicial mortgage: (i) judiciary decision, (ii) recognition of the obligation to pay, give, do or not do (being unnecessary a condemnation commandment), (iii) prior manifestation of the adversary and (iv) proportionality. The eighth chapter covers the specificities of the judicial mortgage created on the basis of judgments in class action, action to defense the public property, individual labor action, arbitration or by foreign authorities. It stands out in this chapter the defense that the interlocutory decision, depending on its content, creates judicial mortgage. The ninth chapter was reserved for study of the mortgage in the context of judicial proceedings. The tenth chapter deals with the jurisdiction to specialize and to order the registration of the judicial mortgage, as well as the means by which registration must be done. It is stressed here the discussion on the merits on the grounds of which the suspensive effect of the appeal should not prevent the establishment of judicial mortgage. The eleventh chapter contains goods that can and can not be subject to judicial mortgage, with the proposition, lege ferenda, that some goods may be subject to judicial pledge. The twelfth and thirteenth chapter contains a study of preference right, which, according to what was proposed, is generated by the mortgage judicial, treating it, first generally and in special contests creditors (bankruptcy, civil insolvency, liquidation and reorganization). The thirteenth chapter contains the conclusions. In the fourteenth chapter, there is a criticism of the text that was approved in the Senate to replace the current Article 466 of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Law. Finally, the fifteenth chapter contains a bibliography referenced.

Este estudo analisa, por meio de pesquisa exploratório-descritiva, o contexto do financiamento do sistema de saúde brasileiro, apontando o desenvolvimento histórico, organização e descentralização e também o contexto de saúde pública no Brasil. O estudo toma por base as determinações da Constituição federal de 1988 (CF/88), no tocante ao Sistema de Saúde do Brasil e revisa a literatura de estudos relacionados à temática, até o ano de 2016.A CF/88 instituiu novo padrão para organização e ação do Estado e reconheceu a saúde como Direito Social. Desde então, a administração pública tornou-se responsável pela promoção e efetivação do direito à saúde, redefinindo as prioridades do Estado, a fim de organizar e promover os meios de saúde pública. O financiamento do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) é financiado, nos termos da Lei, com recursos do Orçamento da Seguridade Social (OSS), da União, dos Estados, do Distrito Federal e Municípios, e de outras fontes, que visam a garantir percentuais e comprometimento dos entes federativos em aplicar recursos que resultem em políticas públicas de saúde para a população. Dentro do período vivenciado pelo SUS, desde sua institucionalização, registram-se fenômenos que impactam no seu desenvolvimento. Desta forma, o estudo descreve as Renúncias Fiscais em saúde sob o enfoque de Incentivos do Governo ao setor privado e Pessoa Física, Desonerações Fiscais, cujas desonerações alcançam impostos que subsidiam o SUS. Abordam-se também, nesse contexto, os Programas de Recuperação Fiscal - REFIS, cujo intuito do Governo é receber as dívidas das empresas. As crescentes demandas de ações judiciais, que determinam o cumprimento de exigibilidades não previstas, que culminam em efeitos que comprometem os orçamentos principalmente dos entes subnacionais. Dado que importa analisar o contexto e entendimento dos princípios que norteiam o SUS, quais sejam, da Universalidade e Integralidade e Equidade. Disto posto, a divisão da Federação, efetivada com intuito de compartilhar responsabilidades, propiciou certo conformismo por parte da União, no tocante a sua parcela de recursos para manter o setor da saúde. Diante de muitas implicações, desafiadora tornou-se a subsistência do SUS, a fim de cumprir o que determina a CF/88, demandando estudos sobre a necessidade de reforma de sua estrutura de financiamento, com vistas a assegurar a integridade, universalidade, bem como a sustentabilidade do Sistema. / This study analyzes, through exploratory-descriptive research, the context of financing the Brazilian health system, pointing out the historical development, organization and decentralization, as well as the context of public health in Brazil. The study is based on the provisions of the Federal Constitution of 1988 (CF / 88) regarding the Brazilian Health System and reviews the literature on studies related to the subject until the year 2016. The CF / 88 established a new standard for organization and action of the State and recognized health as Social Law. Since then, public administration has become responsible for the promotion and realization of the right to health, redefining the priorities of the State in order to organize and promote public health facilities. The financing of the Unified Health System (SUS) is financed, under the terms of the Law, with resources from the Social Security Budget (OSS), the Federal, State, Federal District and Municipalities, and other sources, aimed at guaranteeing percentages and commitment of federative entities to apply resources that result in public health policies for the population. Within the period experienced by the SUS, since its institutionalization, phenomena that impact its development are recorded. In this way, the study describes the Health Tax Renunciations under the focus of Government Incentives to the private sector and Individuals, Tax Deductions, whose exemptions reach taxes that subsidize SUS. In this context, the Tax Recovery Programs (REFIS) are also addressed, in which the Government intends to receive the debts of the companies. The increasing demands of lawsuits, which determine the fulfillment of unanticipated liabilities, which culminate in effects that compromise budgets mainly of subnational entities. Given that it is important to analyze the context and understanding of the principles that guide SUS, namely, of Universality and Integrality and Equity. Therefore, the division of the Federation, made with the aim of sharing responsibilities, provided some conformity on the part of the Union, regarding its share of resources to maintain the health sector. In the face of many implications, challenging became the subsistence of the SUS, in order to comply with what determines CF / 88, demanding studies on the need to reform its financing structure, with a view to ensuring integrity, universality and the sustainability of the System.

La thèse a pour objet d’étude le rejugement. Plus généralement elle porte sur le sens que l’on donne à la notion d’autorité de la chose jugée en contentieux administratif. Cette notion est comprise, dans la thèse, comme signifiant que ce qui a déjà été jugé ne peut être rejugé. L’autorité de la chose jugée entraîne donc en principe l’interdiction de rejuger une affaire ou un élément d’une affaire qui a déjà été tranché par une juridiction compétente pour clore définitivement un litige ou le point du litige concerné. Or la thèse vise à démontrer que l’autorité de la chose jugée en contentieux administratif n’interdit pas toujours, en droit positif, sous réserve d’un noyau d’intangibilité, le rejugement des décisions de justice. Cette étude est intéressante pour trois raisons: Premièrement, il fait l'objet d'une grande actualité (succession de recours en contentieux des contrats administratifs, réception par le juge administratif des décisions rendues sur une question prioritaire de constitutionnalité par le Conseil constitutionnel ; articulation entre les décisions de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme et de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne et de celles du juge administratif). Deuxièmement, ce sujet a été à peine étudié dans le contentieux administratif. Certaines notions (comme celles de procès, de jugement, de recours, de questions, d'irrévocabilité, d'opposabilité ...), certaines distinctions (autorité formelle / matérielle ; autorité négative / autorité positive) ont donné lieu à peu d'étude par la doctrine publiciste. Troisièmement, cette étude a pour ambition de tenter d'étudier sous un nouvel angle la notion d'autorité de la chose jugée. Cela implique de réfléchir à des conditions de stabilité des décisions de justice, ou encore sur le concept de sécurité juridique appliqué aux jugements. Ces notions ont été particulièrement analysées s'agissant des actes administratifs et non pas du point de vue des décisions de justice. L'idée est donc de procéder à une analyse comparative de ces deux grands types de décisions. Cette thèse peut contribuer à mettre en évidence des principes propres à la décision de justice et à réfléchir sur les fondements de l'autorité de chose jugée, que sont notamment la nécessité de rétablir la paix sociale entre les parties au procès, la bonne administration de la justice et la stabilité des situations juridiques. Ces fondements doivent être articulés avec le droit au recours et l'exigence de qualité de la justice. L'étude du rejugement devrait permettre également de mettre en avant la manière dont les juges administratifs conçoivent cette notion "d'autorité de la chose jugée" et qui pourrait être différente de celle des juges civils. Pour réaliser cette étude, il semble important de prendre en compte les différents éléments du droit du contentieux administratif, à la lumière des procédures civile et pénale, ainsi que de la procédure européenne. La recherche dans ces domaines se porte principalement sur les sources du 20ème et du 21ème siècles, d'un point de vue théorique et pratique. A travers cette analyse critique, la méthode retenue consiste à vérifier comment le concept et ses fondements sont appliqués et si la théorie correspond à la pratique. L'idée est d'essayer de développer un cadre en vue de simplifier la procédure pour le justiciable, pour la bonne administration de la justice et le service public de la justice.mots-clés : Autorité,Chose,Jugée,Contentieux,Administratif,Rejugement / This thesis aims at the study of retrial proceedings, more specifically at the meaning of the concept of ‘res judicata’ in administrative litigation. This is understood as cases that have already been judged and therefore cannot be retried again. The principle of ‘res judicata’ implies a ban to retrial a case or a fact for the proceedings, which have already been settled by the competent court in order to definitely close the litigation or as a point of contention in the grievance concerned. Yet, this thesis aims at demonstrating that in administrative litigation if it exist a minimum reserve of intangibility, then the principle of ‘res judicata’ does not always ban the retrial of court decisions.This study is interesting for three reasons:First, it is a subject of great debate nowadays (successive actions in administrative contracts litigations; reception by the administrative judge of decided cases as priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality of the Constitutional Council; linkage to the decisions of the European Court of Human rights and to the Court of Justice of the European Union and those of the administrative judge).Second, this subject has been scarcely studied in administrative litigation. Some concepts of law (such as those of trial, judgement, action, question, irrevocability, enforceability…), some of the distinctions (formal authority/hardware authority; negative authority/positive authority) have not been the subject of extensive research by scholars in field of Public Law.Third, present the principle of ‘res judicata’ in a new light. This involves thinking about conditions for the stability of judicial decisions, and the concept of legal certainly applied to judgements. These concepts have been particularly analysed in terms of administrative acts but not in terms of judicial decisions. The idea is also to conduct a comparative analysis of these two main types of decisions.This thesis may help to clarify the principles of judicial decision and to think about the foundations of the authority of ‘res judicata’, which are particularly important in the social sphere to restore peaceful relations between the parties in the trial, for the proper administration of justice, and the stability of legal situations. These foundations should be contained with the right of recourse and the quality of justice. The study of retrial proceedings will also clarify the way in which the administrative judges perceive ‘res judicata’, which might be different than the one applied in civil courts.For this study, it seems obvious to take into account the different elements of Administrative Litigation Law, in the light of civil and penal procedures, and also European Procedure Law. The goal is to research in these subject areas using secondary 20th and 21st century sources, from a theoretical and practical point of view. And through this critical analysis see how the concept and its foundations are being applied and how the theoretical corresponds to the practical. The idea behind it is to try to develop a framework in order to simplify the procedure for the litigant, for the proper administration of justice and the public service of justice.mots-clés : Authority,Res,Judicata,Litigation,Administrative,Retrial