Diss. Karlstad : Karlstads universitet, 2009.

I detta arbete används en fenomenografisk metod för att undersöka hur gymnasielärare beskriver och förklarar tre olika evolutionsbiologiska begrepp. Begreppen är naturligt urval (selektion), anpassning (adaptation) och evolutionsteorins förklaringskraft. Efter att lärarnas svar har undersökts och kategoriserats i förhållande till varandra jämförs de också med förklaringar av begreppen som förekommer i läroböcker avsedda för kurser i evolutionsbiologi på universitetet. Det som framkommer är att lärarna beskriver kvalitativt skilda beskrivningar av alla tre begreppen. I fallet med det naturliga urvalet och evolutionsteorins förklaringskraft framgår att lärarna uttrycker så kallande vardagsföreställningar eller alternativa idéer om begreppen. När det gäller begreppet anpassning uppvisar alla lärare en god begreppsförståelse och att de dessutom är medvetna om vilka vardagsföreställningar eleverna ofta bär på. Slutligen diskuteras vilka möjliga åtgärder som kan vidtagas för att förbättra evolutionsundervisningen på både gymnasiet och lärarutbildningarna.

This paper investigates how students in the humanities in four universities in Sweden reflect on their education and the current view on the humanities as an education and a science. I want to investigate what impact the past few years public debate about the humanities have had on the students. What kind of beliefs and identities do the students of the humanities form and how do they discuss the universities, the choices they made in life and how do they feel about the future. This study is based on interviews with seventeen students in Sweden from four different universities. The research is also based upon a report that The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv) published in 2011 and the debate following that report. I have also made participant observations on the four universities to make a broader description for the reader. The paper mainly uses post-structuralistic theory (Foucault and Althusser) to analyze the informants lifes and thoughts about their education and future.    This research highlights the complexity involved when students  make choices for the future. Idealized views of education and what is important in life exists and creates gaps between what the person want and what is perceived are normative. There is a perceived hierarchy among universities, students and educations. Students of the humanities often feel that their position in this hierarchy is weaker than the idealised student and that makes the interpellation of the subjects harder but not less important.

In today's society, the term stress is a well-known phenomenon. It is something that everyone,regardless of age, encounters and is forced to deal with. Within the world of universities, thestress that occurs has increased among today's students. More than half of all students becomedepressed because of the pressures that arise around them. This study aims to investigate howstudents, specifically students who study to become teachers at Umea University, experiencestress. What are the factors that affect their level of stress and are there any special strategiesthat work to regulate the stress? The approach that the study has taken is a qualitative study, in which four students haveparticipated in an interview about how they experience the stress, and which factors andstrategies have helped to reduce the discomfort. The results from the interviews have thenbeen summarized and analyzed with the help of previous research in the subject and twotheories. These two theories are based on a socio-psychological orientation and are calledKASAM and coping. These theories aim to see what affects an individual's stress level andhow the individual can manage the stress that occurs. The qualitative interview has beenbased on a thematic analysis that has helped highlight what the students' experiences have incommon and what possible solutions are available to reduce the academic stress. The results showed that the symptoms felt by the students corresponded well with stresssymptoms. Depression, anxiety, migraines are just some of the symptoms shown.Furthermore, the results from the interviews showed that performance, ambiguity,expectation, anticipation, and motivation were all factors that affected the level of stress felt.And the strategies to avoid this stress were routines, activities, knowledge, and acceptancefrom the students.

No description available.

Universitet är stora meritokratiska organisationer där strävan efter konkurrenskraft aldrig tar slut. Universitetets främsta roll är att utbilda, forska och bygga ny kunskap. Medarbetares kompetens och ytterst meriter samt att bygga rätt sammansättning av meritering är därför centralt för universitetet. Det blir därmed viktigt för universiteten att behålla de bästa medarbetarna och motivera medarbetarna till att arbeta mot organisationens mål. Denna studie behandlar medarbetarna på Luleå tekniska universitets syn på relationen mellan motivation, återkoppling, belöning, prestation och befordran. Syftet med denna studie är att identifiera hur meritering ser ut och är relaterat till prestationerna i en meritokratisk organisation. Genom att uppnå syftet kan vi bidra och inspirera till vidare forskning om hur medarbetare med långsiktiga mål och tydliga karriärvägar kan uppfatta styrning. För att uppnå detta har litteratursökningar i vetenskapliga artiklar gjorts och empiriska underlag samlats in genom semistrukturerade intervjuer. En abduktiv ansats har tillämpats i studien. Resultatet visar att det finns ett tydligt samband mellan medarbetarnas prestation och befordran. Men att det i förlängningen är starkare genom forskningen än undervisningen. Empirin visar även att intervjupersonerna främst ser de icke monetära belöningarna som bidragande faktorer till ökad motivation samt att återkoppling är viktigt för motivation. De anställda anser att de får tillräcklig återkoppling från studenterna men flertalet önskar mer återkoppling från chefer. / Universities are large meritocratic organizations where the pursuit of competitiveness never ends. The main role of universities is to educate, conduct research and discover new knowledge. Therefore are both the employees’ competence and the right composition of merit central to the universities. It thus becomes crucial for the universities to retain the best employees and motivate the employees to work towards the organization's goals. This study shows the employees at Luleå University of Technology's view of the correlation between motivation, feedback, reward, performance, and promotion. The purpose of the study is to find out what merit looks like and how it is related to the performance of a meritocratic organization. By achieving the purpose, we can contribute and inspire further research on how employees with long-term goals and clear career paths can perceive management control. To achieve this, literature searches in scientific articles have been done and empirical data has been collected through semi-structured interviews. An abductive approach has been applied in the study. The results show that the connection between employees' performance and promotion is stronger through research than teaching. The empiric also shows that the interviewees mainly see the non-monetary rewards as contributing factors to increased motivation and that feedback is important for motivation. The employees consider that they receive enough feedback from the students, but the majority want more feedback from managers.

The study has consisted of creating a place for snow storage with a connecting storm water facility. This is based on findings regarding concentrations of pollutants in Luleå's snow storages in combination with Luleå's standards for design of these storages. For Luleå Municipality, the stormwater issue is relevant as the number of floods will increase as Luleå expands. This results in a greater ratio of hard-made surfaces with increased surface runoff that create risks of flooding and property damage, something that will intensify even further with climate change. Besides this, the runoff concentration of pollutants that are transported out into recipients also increases. The study has been carried out in Luleå, via Luleå Municipality and LTU. The purpose of the study was to answer the following questions:"What concentrations of pollutants are found in Luleå's meltwater?", "What does Luleå' smanagement of snow storage look like, and why?", "Where can a snow storage be placed in Luleå to enable year-round recreation?” and "Which stormwater solution should be chosen to filter pollutants from this snow deposit?". This was answered via seven different means of gathering data: literature studies, field studies/observations, meetings/interviews & E-mail exchanges, selection of a stormwater facility, calculations, simulations, and conceptual design. Through these means, the study concluded that the concentrations of pollutants in meltwater are generally greater than in stormwater, that there are recommendations regarding the size, location and safety of Luleås snow storages, that any snow storage should preferably be located where motor traffic is not present and that its space should be usable year round with regard to recreation, and that a wetland is the most suitable facility for filtering the pollutants in the meltwater from this deposit. Overall, the results conveys that the spaces set aside for snow and meltwater treatment should enable year-round recreation, in addition to their technical functions. However, does the results show nothing in terms of management of extreme cases of rainfall nor any types flooding preventions relating to stormwater management. This paper does not provide any suggestions for a snow storage site nor a stormwater treatment facility for cities with a similar or different climate. The reason that onlyr ecreation and pollution treatment were considered is because these are the most relevant in this context, firstly since toxins are more prevalent in meltwater than in stormwater, and because recreation associated with snow is a given aspect of usage. Thus were a suitable frame of question and suitable means used to generate reasonable and acceptable results.

Enligt högskolelagen ingår det i högskolors och universitets uppdrag, förutom utbildning och forskning, också att samverka med omgivande samhälle. Då samverkansuppdraget inte är lika väldefinierat som utbildnings- och forskningsuppdraget, finns det behov av en gemensam målbild mellan lärosäten och externa parter gällande vad man önskar uppnå med samverkan. Detta examensarbete undersöker vilka likheter och/eller skillnader som finns med avseende på de mål som extern part, forskare och lärare samt samverkansrådgivare har i de mål som ligger som grund för samverkan mellan ett universitet och externa parter. Det har genomförts nio stycken semistrukturerade intervjuer från tre olika intressegrupper av samverkan: samverkansrådgivare på Linnéuniversitetet, lärare & forskare på Linnéuniversitetet samt externa intressenter. Värdefokuserat tänkande har använts som teoretisk referensram. Utifrån intervjuerna har de fundamentala och instrumentella målen konstruerats i en målstruktur för respektive informant. De fundamentala och instrumentella målen visar vad de olika informanterna har för värderingar kring samverkan och vilka mål de olika parterna önskar uppnå med att samverka med varandra. Fundamentala mål som förekom i flera av målstrukturerna var att bidra till nytta för samhället, att bidra till samhällsutvecklingen och att lösa gemensamma samhällsutmaningar. Ett instrumentellt mål som förekom i flera av målstrukturerna är vikten av att arbeta med studenter, då detta bidrog till att uppfylla de fundamentala målen att stärka kompetensförsörjningen i regionen och kom till nytta för samhällsutvecklingen. De instrumentella målen att arbeta med forskningsprojekt leder till att de fundamentala målen för ökad innovation och att lösa gemensamma samhällsutmaningar kan uppnås. / According to the Higher Education Act, colleges and universities are required to, in addition to education and research, collaborate with the outside society. Since collaboration is not as clearly defined as education and the research assignment, there is a need for a common goal image about what you want to achieve with collaboration. This master’s degree thesis studies what similarities and/or differences an external part, researchers & teachers and senior advisor in collaboration, have as goals with collaboration between a university and external partners. Value-focused thinking is used as theoretic framework. The study consists of nine semi structured interviews from three different interest groups: senior advisors in collaboration from Linnaeus University, researchers & teachers from Linnaeus University and external partners. From the interviews fundamental objectives and means objectives were identified and structured into hierarchies and means-ends networks from each informant´s answers. The fundamental and means objectives show what similarities and differences the informants have for values concerning collaboration and what goals the different parties wish to achieve by collaborating with each other. Fundamental objectives that existed in several of the structures were to contribute to the benefit of society, to contribute to the development of society and to solve common social challenges. A means objective that existed in the goal structures is the importance of working with students, as working with students helped fulfil the fundamental objectives to strengthen the competence in the region and came to benefit the development of society. The means objectives in research were to contribute to the fundamental objectives in strengthen innovation and benefit by enabling to solve common societal challenges.