La première partie présente un Bernard de Clairvaux Philosophe. Fleuron du socratisme Chrétien il lui donne une inflexion marquant le primat de l’humilité (Ch. I), le détour nécessaire par la charité (Ch. II) avant de parvenir à la contemplation (Ch. IV). Entre ces deux points d’inflexion, un chapitre développe le rôle central pour lui du libre arbitre et celui de la conscience (Ch. III). La deuxième partie recherche la présence ou non de ces caractéristiques chez trois cisterciens parmi les plus proches de Bernard : Aelred de Rievaulx, Guerric d’Igny, Geoffroy d’Auxerre (Ch. I). Puis (Ch. II) elle examine trois auteurs cisterciens parmi les plus philosophes du XIIe siècle : Isaac de l’Étoile, Garnier de Rochefort et Hélinand de Froidmont. Enfin, elle en vient à trois auteurs qualifiés de "satellites" : Guillaume de Saint-Thierry, Alain de Lille et Joachim de Flore. / In the first part, Bernard of Clairvaux is considered as a philosopher. Jewel of Christian socratism, he gives it a new orientation, first insisting on humility (Ch. I), then on the necessary bend of charity (Ch. II), before reaching contemplation (Ch. IV). In the midst Ch. III develops the central part played by freewill in his system and that of conscience. The second part checks the presence or not of these philosophic views, first in the works of three Cistercians among the closest to Bernard: Aelred of Rievaulx, Guerric of Igny, and Geoffroy of Auxerre (Ch. I). Then Ch. II’s focus is on three among the most philosophic authors of the Order: Isaac of Stella, Garnier of Rochefort, and Hélinand of Froidmont. Finally, it comes to three "satellites»: Guillaume of Saint-Thierry, Alain of Lille, Joachim of Fiore.

No description available.

<p>As of June 2020, there were nearly 71 million displaced persons worldwide fleeing their homes due to conflict and war (“Figures at a Glance,” UNHCR, 2020). One of the critical needs following displacement and subsequent resettlement is to address the immense psychological turmoil refugees may have endured. Despite the need for care, refugees often face barriers to accessing mental health care after resettlement, including inadequate translation services, poor provider cultural competence, and difficulty navigating services (Asgary & Segar, 2011). An important aspect in meeting the mental health needs of resettled refugees in the U.S. are the refugee resettlement agencies that help refugees rebuild their lives post-resettlement. Thus, this study focused on the mental health providers working with resettled refugees within refugee resettlement agencies. <a>Through the use of mixed methods, this study collected quantitative and qualitative data across three phases to 1) obtain a greater understanding of the available mental health services within refugee resettlement agencies, 2) examine cultural competence in mental health providers working within these agencies, and 3) identify the culturally competent strategies mental health providers use to improve access to mental health services in this context</a>. The results of this study, including an integration of the data across phases, and a discussion complete with 12 suggestions for mental health providers working with resettled refugees are presented. We hope the results and implications of this study will contribute to our understanding of, and subsequently address, the issues related to mental health service accessibility experienced by resettled refugees.</p>

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

There has been a lack of training and implementation of cultural humility in the helping professions. Clinician’s awareness of their own biases, assumptions, and cultural identities is critical when working with individuals who each have their own array of cultural identities. The following research examined the efficacy of cultural humility art-based training courses through surveys and examining the art experiential activity that was provided. The purpose of this research was to determine whether cultural humility art-based training would effectively increase mental health practitioners’ comfort, ability, and confidence in addressing culturally sensitive issues in their clinical work. The training focused on introducing the tenets of cultural humility with art directives to help participants reflect on their cultural identity. 47 Participants completed surveys that were analyzed in addition to their art in order to gain qualitative data. The data suggests that cultural humility art-based training effectively increased participant’s comfort, ability, and confidence in practicing cultural humility in their work with clients/patients and colleagues. More training and research are needed to generalize findings and determine their longevity.

As the state of the world continues to evolve through means of social justice and technology, the discussion of cultural humility as the evolution of cultural competence is a growing topic in the field of mental health and the art therapy community. The following mixed- method research explores the impact of art materials, group processes, and creative practices in the development of cultural humility. Six graduate students from the Marital and Family Art Therapy Program at Loyola Marymount University (LMU) designed the following collaborative ethnography. Utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data to answer the question: How can group art-based practices (e.g., materials, group processes) develop cultural humility among art therapists? The data collected include pre and post-survey statistics in addition to art responses and dialogue reflection. The data revealed that art-based group processes and the intentional choice of material may facilitate the growth surrounding the four principles of cultural humility. Critical self-reflection was achieved through a deep exploration of individual experiences surrounding socioeconomic status, race, colonialism, gender, family, and spirituality. Participants were able to readdress the power imbalance by taking on the role of participant and facilitator taking into consideration how information and materials are both presented and received. Through group art-making, sharing, and discussing systemic changes, participants developed partnerships with communities and maintained institutional accountability. In order to build upon our findings, we propose future research on group-based art practices with mental health professionals and trainees that focus on the development of cultural humility in different social and environmental contexts.

The current study is the first to explore the role of cultural humility, cultural comfort, and the therapeutic relationship in play therapy. Participants consisted of 69 parent-therapist dyads recruited from university clinics, private practices, and a non-profit counseling center in the southwestern United States. Parents completed a demographic questionnaire, Cultural Humility Scale, Therapist Cultural Comfort Scale, and Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory – Other to Self 40 (BLRI OS – 40). Play therapists completed a demographic questionnaire and BLRI MO – 40. A multiple regression analysis indicated that after controlling for the race/ethnicity of both play therapist and parent, parents' perceptions of play therapists' cultural humility and cultural comfort predicted parents' perception of their therapeutic relationship with their child's play therapist. Additionally, exploratory analyses suggested that when therapists report the occurrence of cultural conversation in parent consultations there may be an increase in parent-reported therapeutic relationship scores. However, when also controlling for the child's race/ethnicity, cultural humility and cultural comfort did not have a statistically significant impact on the play therapist's perception of the therapeutic relationship with their child client. These findings underscore the significance of play therapists' cultural humility and cultural comfort on the development of a strong therapeutic relationship with parents of children in play therapy. Limitations and implications for practice and future research are discussed.

[pt] A crescente adoção pelas organizações de estruturas projetizadas ou matriciais, em um ambiente de alta competitividade traz para o centro das atenções a figura do gerente de projetos, que é o responsável, em última instância pelo desempenho do projeto que comanda. Esse ambiente de alta complexidade, onde o gerente de projetos precisa liderar equipes multidisciplinares e, em alguns casos, não alocadas no mesmo local e sem relação hierárquica, impõe desafios à liderança do gerente de projetos. Assim, o presente estudo se propõe a verificar se traços de humildade e narcisismo nesse gerente, avaliados sob a ótica dos liderados, estão associados com os resultados do projeto, avaliados pelo diretor de projetos ou figura de cargo similar. O trabalho propõe e avalia se essas relações são mediadas pelo empoderamento psicológico ou pelo medo de falhar, sendo o primeiro mobilizado pela humildade do líder e o segundo provocado pelo narcisismo. O estudo foi realizado através de pesquisa quantitativa, baseada em questionários distribuídos e respondidos por 190 liderados e outro questionário sendo respondido pelos 68 diretores dos respectivos projetos. Os achados sugerem que a humildade do líder está positivamente associada com o empoderamento psicológico e com os resultados financeiro e global dos projetos e que o narcisismo do líder está positivamente associado com os resultados de qualidade e global dos projetos. / [en] The increasing adoption by organizations of projected or matrix structures in a highly competitive environment brings to the center of attention the figure of the project manager, who is ultimately responsible for the performance of the project he or she commands. In this highly complex environment, where the project manager needs to lead multidisciplinary teams and, in some cases, not allocated in the same place and without hierarchical relationship, the need for the project manager to emerge as a leader. Thus, the present study aims to verify the relation of the humility and narcissism traits of the leader, evaluated by the led, with the results obtained in the Project, evaluated by the project director or similar position figure. The work examined whether these relations were mediated by psychological empowerment or fear of failure, the first being mobilized by the humility of the leader and the second caused by narcissism. The study was conducted through quantitative research with questionnaires being distributed and answered by 190 followers and another questionnaire being answered by the 68 directors of the respective projects. The findings suggest that humility is positively related with psychological empowerment and projects financial and overall performances and that narcissism is positively related with the projects quality and overall performances.