土地開發分析法是開發人員與估價師評估土地價格的重要方法之一，然而不同從業人員針對相同標的估值往往不盡相同，是估價人員的偏誤造成價格上的差異？抑或是估價人員運用土地開發分析法時，各項投入參數差異所產生？本研究以台北市公開標售成交地價與上市建設公司評估台北市地價分別分析，利用@Risk尋找土地開發分析法各項投入參數可能的機率分配型態，再以蒙地卡羅模擬分析建立土地開發分析價格的機率模型，並利用平均絕對百分比誤差（MAPE）、命中率（hit Rate）及交插驗證(cross-validation)做為機率模型預測估值優劣程度的衡量標準，比較「公開標售」組與「評估地價」組兩者機率模型何者預測能力。結果發現「評估資料」組的估值準確性較佳，「公開標售」組所建立之機率模型較不具預測效果。而三種適合度檢定之機率模型則是以A-D適合度檢定所建立之機率模型表現最佳(MAPE為14.98%，誤差±10% Hit-rate為38.46%，誤差±20% Hit-rate為71.43%)。本文透過機率模型的建立，考量不動產開發隱含之風險，呈現估值的結果由定值轉變為區間；考量不同估價人員或開發業者間，對於相同投入參數不同認知的情形；本模型將對地價敏感性較大之投入參數由定值轉為機率密度函數，較估價人員或開發業者主觀認定各項投入參數之變動更為客觀；可應用於大量估價，亦可作為估價人員或開發業者評估土地時，價格之參考 / Land development analysis is one of the developers and valuers assessment of land price method, different practitioners, however, is often not the same for the valuation of the same subject, valuers bias caused by the difference in price? Or valuers use of the land development analysis, the various input parameters the differences? In this study, turnover in Taipei sale by public tender premium and public listed construction company to assess the land value of Taipei City were analyzed, Looking for land development analysis the probability distribution of possible input parameters using the @ Risk, useing Monte Carlo simulation analysis to establish the land development analysis of the price of the probability model, and using the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), the hit rate and cross-validation as a probability model to predict the measure of the quality and extent of the valuation, "open auction” group and “assess the premium” group between the two probability model may be predictive ability. The results showed that the valuation accuracy of the assessment information group better probability model created by the sale by public tender group compared with no predictive effect. Three kinds of fit test of the probability model is based on the AD for degree verification to establish the probability model the best performing (MAPE of 14.98%, the error is ± 10% Hit-the rate is 38.46%, the error is ± 20% the Hit-the rate is 71.43% ). Through the establishment of the probability model, consider the real estate development implied the risk of showing the results of the valuation by the valuation change interval; considerations between the different valuation or development industry, for the same input parameters of different cognitive situations; this model will have premium The larger sensitivity of the input parameters from the given value to the probability density function over valuation or development industry subjective judgments more objective changes of the input parameters; can be applied to a large number of valuation, assessment of land may be used as the valuation or development industryWhen the reference price.

The municipalities in Sweden can use the PBL-legislation to request a land developer to fund new public infrastructure in the dwelling area where the developer are active. The municipality have had two options to choose between. To purchase a contract with an entrepreneur that build the infrastructure paid by the developer, or let the developer both build and pay the infrastructure. The La Scala-judgment came 2001 from the EG-tribunal. This judgment have by many people been interpreted as that as public infrastructure in Sweden should be purchased by the municipalities through LOU. Therefore, the purpose of this report is to discuss how the land development process has changed and which problems that have arisen since 2010, when it became customary that the municipality should procure public streets and sewage facilities under the Swedish Public Procurement Act (“LOU”). The purpose is also to discuss if this way to proceed satisfies the purpose of LOU and also discuss if their can be any alternative interpretations of the La Scalajudgment than have been done so far for Swedish conditions. The questions that became a consequence of the purpose where answered as follow in the report: Changes Today, the general rule is that the municipality is to purchase all public streets itself in the land development process. This rule has replaced the freedom of choosing whether to do so, that previously existed. Necessary land transfers take place today at an early stage of the process, often when the zoning plan becomes valid, as compared to before when it took place late in the land development process. Problems Some problems have arisen in cases when the municipality procures. This leads to the conclusion that the land development process today has become more risky, significantly more expensive, and that it takes longer time before the houses are ready for occupants to move in to, than previously was the case. To what extent does this new procedure implement LOU’s purpose? LOU's purpose, to get an effectively use of tax money, is not fulfilled by this procedure because the municipalities do not have any expenditures, which means that there are no funds which can be considered “effectively used”. As the municipality has no cost, it is questionable whether it really is to the municipality that an entrepreneur sells his services, rather than to the land developer paying for the services. Overall, this means that the purpose is probably not fulfilled by this new procedure. In what situations can the LOU procedure be questioned? The consequences of LOU can be questioned where it leads to major problems that would not occur if the legislation was more flexible. An example of this is when there is a lone land developer, who builds on his own property. If the municipality procures this, as happens today, problems arise in terms of money, time and coordination problems. This because it is more efficient if the developer that are already active in the area build all necessary infrastructure. Can any other interpretations of the La Scala-judgment and it´s relationship to the Swedish development process be found? One alternative interpret is that the municipal should use LOU on this kind of contracts when there is a risk that the municipal lose financial resources if they don´t do it. In the Italian development process there is always a risk that the municipal lose financial resources if they don´t purchase the contracts. The Swedish land development legislation are structured so the municipality never take a risk to lose financial recourses if they let the developer build everything in the area and therefore the municipality never can lose financial recourses in these cases. The Swedish municipalities don’t get any advantages if they use LOU here because the developer pays the real cost for all parts of the contract. Therefore, LOU is irrelevant in this part of the development process. / I Sverige kan en kommun med stöd av PBL begära att en exploatör ska bekosta utbyggnad av allmänna platser där exploatören bygger nya bostadsområden. Kommunen har historiskt haft två utförandealternativ att välja mellan. Man har haft möjlighet att själv upphandla en entreprenör med LOU som bygger och som bekostas av exploatören eller låta exploatören både bygga och bekosta anläggningarna. År 2001 kom en dom från EG-domstolen som av många tolkats som att allmänna platser ska upphandlas via LOU av kommunen. Som en konsekvens har det de senaste åren skett en övergång där kommunen idag som huvudregel tillämpar LOU på utbyggnad av allmänna platser. Syftet är därför att diskutera hur exploateringsprocessen har förändrats och vilka problem som uppstått sedan 2010 då kommuner som en konsekvens av La Scala-domen upphandlar allmänna platser enligt LOU. Syftet är även att diskutera om detta förfarande uppfyller LOU:s syfte och om det finns några alternativa tolkningar av La Scala-domen än dem som hittills gjorts i Sverige. De frågor som följde på syftet besvaras i rapporten enligt följande Förändringar Huvudregeln är idag att kommunen ska upphandla alla allmänna gator själv i exploateringsprocessen istället för som tidigare när det som huvudregel var exploatören som upphandlade dessa. Erforderliga marköverföringar sker idag i ett tidigt skede, ofta i samband med att detaljplanen vinner laga kraft, istället för som tidigare när det skedde i slutet av exploateringsprocessen. Problem Det finns risk för problem som tidigare inte funnits i lika stor utsträckning när kommunen upphandlar. Exempel är samordningsproblem och tidsproblem. Dessa leder sammanfattningsvis till att exploateringsprocessen idag riskerar att bli dyrare samt att det tar längre tid innan husen står inflyttningsklara än vad fallet var tidigare. Hur väl uppfyller detta nya förfarande LOU:s syfte? LOU:s syfte, att få ett effektivt utnyttjande av skattemedel, uppfylls inte eftersom det i dessa fall saknas skattemedel att få ett effektivt utnyttjande av. Syftet att alla företag ska ha möjlighet att sälja sin tjänst till kommunen kan starkt ifrågasättas eftersom det är exploatören som betalar för upphandlingen. I vilka situationer kan LOU-förfarandet ifrågasättas? De situationer där LOU-förfarandet kan ifrågasättas är där det uppstår stora problem som inte skulle uppstå om lagstiftningen medgav flexibilitet. Ett exempel på detta är de fall där det är en ensam exploatör som bygger på sin egen fastighet. Om kommunen upphandlar allmän gata, så som sker idag, uppstår problem i termer av pengar, tid och samordningsproblem eftersom det är mer effektivt att den exploatör som redan är verksam i området bygger all nödvändig infrastruktur. Finns alternativa tolkningar av La Scala-domen och dess förhållande till den svenska exploateringsprocessen? En alternativ tolkning är att kommuner ska upphandla den här typen an entreprenader i de fall kommunen kan förlora ekonomiska medel på att inte göra det. Så som den italienska exploateringsprocessen är uppbyggd finns alltid en risk att italienska kommuner gör en förlust i ekonomiska termer i de fall man väljer att inte upphandla infrastruktur offentligt. I Sverige är exploateringslagstiftningen däremot utformad så att kommunen aldrig tar någon ekonomisk risk och därför inte kan förlora ekonomiska medel i de fall man låter en exploatör upphandla en entreprenör. Kommunen har i det svenska fallet inte något att vinna på en offentlig upphandling eftersom det är exploatören som betalar den faktiska kostnaden. Offentlig upphandling saknar därför relevans och betydelse i den här delen av exploateringsprocessen.

The thesis is focused on contemporary society requierements for potential changes of historical buildings in the Prague historical centre. The goal is to analyse a contemporary status of trends and evaluate effects on historical prorperties in the Prague historical centre. The contemporary trends consist of different housing ideas, different work organisation and at least so called green buildings. There are significant consequences in to existing historical buildgs as new developments adapt such trends. For a harmonicous suistainable development it would be needed a compromise between economical, social and environmental interests. If it is not accomplished, the city will not be funcional.

Vid projektutveckling utav bostäder i expansiva storstadsområden uppstår stora kostnader vid markförvärv, infrastruktur- och bostadsproduktion. Då byggherren, privat eller kommunal, äger huvudmannaskapet för exploateringsområdet kan infrastrukturen utföras med olika tillvägagångssätt. I Liljeholmen, Stockholm, där JM är en stor markägare, produceras infrastruktur parallellt med bostadsproduktion. I Norra Djurgårdsstaden, Stockholm, har stadens Exploateringskontor istället färdigställt infrastrukturen innan bostadsproduktionen inletts. Rapporten utreder hur dessa två tillvägagångssätt påverkar projektutvecklingens ekonomi, infrastruktur- och bostadsproduktion, logistik, arbetsmiljö, miljö och försäljning. I rapporten omfattar infrastruktur anläggningar som samhället dagligen använder sig av i ett exploateringsområde exempelvis gator, el, tele, fjärrvärme, vatten och avlopp. Rapporten innehåller ej ekonomiska bedömningar i form av kalkyler eftersom detta inte hade varit genomförbart under den korta tidsperioden för arbetet.  I början av undersökningen genomfördes en litteraturstudie för att skapa bred och översiktlig kunskap kring ämnet. Därefter utformades frågemallar som användes under elva personliga intervjuer med sakkunniga från JM, Stockholm stads Exploateringskontor, Forsen Projekt och WSP. Dessutom utfördes en enkätundersökning där syftet var att förstå hur färdigställande av infrastruktur påverkar nyinflyttade bostadsrättsinnehavares självskattade nöjdhet. Resultatet av undersökningen påvisade för majoriteten av delarna att ett storskaligt färdigställande av infrastruktur i ett tidigt skede är det mest fördelaktiga. Detta medför större möjligheter till en kostnadseffektiv infrastruktur- och bostadsproduktion samt bättre förutsättningar för en god arbetsmiljö och logistik. Dessutom möjliggörs bostadsbyggande i en snabbare takt vid en högkonjunktur. Nackdelen med ett tidigt färdigställande är den framtunga och stora investeringen. Denna medför kapitalkostnader och ekonomisk risk, vilket hanteras mer fördelaktigt med det parallella tillvägagångssättet då infrastrukturen produceras i etapper efter behov. För JM som markägare i ett område med cirka tio kvarter föreslås att infrastruktur färdigställs som en kombination av de två tillvägagångssätten. Detta innebär att infrastrukturen, exklusive finplanering, färdigställs för tre kvartersmarksområden samt dess omgärdande allmänna platsmark och ledningssystem. Detta sker innan bostadsproduktionen inleds. I och med det här möjliggörs en mer kostnadseffektiv infrastruktur- och bostadsproduktion på grund av enklare samordning, framkomlighet och logistik på arbetsplatsområdet. Dessutom skapas längre tid till effektiva saneringsmetoder, vilket leder till en kostnads- och miljöbesparing. Då investeringen för en del av infrastrukturen är mindre jämfört med ett färdigställande av all infrastruktur inom området minskas kapitalkostnaderna och den ekonomiska risken. Finplaneringsarbeten utförs i samband med att bostäderna färdigställs, precis innan kunder flyttar in. Detta minimerar risken för skador och slitage på grund av byggtrafik under produktionstiden. Dessutom ökar kundernas nöjdhet då färdigställd finplanering medför en mer attraktiv miljö för boende och kommersiell verksamhet. / Housing developments in urban areas entail considerable expenses in the acquisition of land, the infrastructure development and the production of housing. If the developer, public or private, owns the site the infrastructure can be organized differently. JM, a big landowner and developer, on a site in Liljeholmen, Stockholm developed the infrastructure parallel with the production of housing. In contrast, Stockholm’s Exploateringskontor on their site in Norra Djurgårdsstaden, completed the infrastructure provision before starting to build the housing. This study analyzes how these two approaches affect the economy of the project developments, infrastructure and housing production, logistics, work environment, external environment and sales. In this study infrastructure covers the facilities that the community uses on daily basis, such as roads, electricity, tele communications, heating, water and sewage. The study does not contain economical calculations because of the short time period. A review of the literature was made at the beginning of the studies to create a broad and general knowledge of the subject. Subsequently question templates were designed and used during eleven personal interviews with experts from JM, Stockholm’s Exploateringskontor, Forsen Projekt and WSP. Furthermore, a survey was made to understand how the completion of infrastructure affects the community’s self-rated satisfaction of the environment of occupancy.  The result of the study show that a large-scale completion of infrastructure at an early stage of the development is the most advantageous. The large-scale completion increases the potential for a cost-effective infrastructure and housing production and it also creates better conditions for a good working environment and logistics. It also allows a faster housing production during a boom. However, the large investment at an early stage of the development is a disadvantage when it comes to large-scale completion. The large investment causes capital costs and financial risk. The result is that the parallel approach is more advantageous because the infrastructure is produced in stages after demand with a lower financial risk. JM, as a housing developer for ten blocks in a development area, is recommended to complete the infrastructure as a combination of the two approaches. This means that infrastructure, excluding detailed planning, should be completed for three blocks of the development area along with the surrounding roads and pipeline systems. This takes place before the housing production begins. This enables a more cost-effective infrastructure and housing production because of easier coordination, availability and logistics at the workplace area. It also creates more time for effective soil remediation methods, leading to lower cost and environmental savings. The partial investment in infrastructure is less compared to a completion of all infrastructure in the site area. This reduces the capital costs and financial risk. The detailed planning work is finished with the completion of the housing projects, just before the customers move in. This minimizes the risk of wear and damage due to construction traffic during the construction period. It also increases customer satisfaction when the detailed planning work is completed, making habitation attractive.

This thesis contends that; in mainstream rural residential development around the Australian Capital Territory, use of community title guidelines for sub-division should consider social processes and environmental considerations along-side economic imperatives and interactions. Community title is a form of land tenure that allows for private freehold ownership of land as well as community owned land within the one sub-division. In New South Wales, community title was introduced in 1990 under the Community Land Development Act 1989 (NSW) and the Community Land Management Act 1989 (NSW). Since the introduction of community title, upwards of one hundred and fifty developments, ranging from just a few blocks to the size of small suburbs, have been approved throughout the state. The original aim of community title was to provide a legal framework that underpinned theme-based broad-acre development. Themebased development could include a Permaculture© village, a rural retreat for likeminded equine enthusiasts, or even a medieval village. Community title is also seen as an expedient form of land tenure for both developers and shire councils. Under community title, a developer only has to submit a single development application for a multi-stage development. This can significantly reduce a developer's exposure to risk. From a shire council's perspective, common land and resources within a development, which would otherwise revert to council responsibility for management, becomes the collective responsibility of all the land owners within the development, effectively obviating council from any responsibility for management of that land. Community title is also being touted in planning and policy as a way of achieving 'sustainable' environmental management in new subdivisions. The apparent expediency of community title has meant that development under these guidelines has very quickly moved beyond theme-based development into mainstream rural residential development. Community title effectively provides a framework for participatory governance of these developments. The rules governing a community title development are set out in the management statement, which is submitted to the local council and the state government with the development application. A community association, which includes all lot owners, manages the development. Unless written into the original development application, the council has no role in the management of the common land and resources. This thesis looks at the peri-urban zone around one of Australia's fastest growing cities - Canberra, whose population growth and relative affluence is impacting on rural residential activity in the shires surrounding the Australian Capital Territory. Yarrowlumla Shire, immediately adjacent to the ACT, has experienced a 362 percent increase in population since 1971. Much of this growth has been in the form of rural residential or hobby farm development. Since 1990, about fifteen percent of the development in Yarrowlumla Shire has been community title. The Yass Shire, to the north of the ACT, has shown a forty five percent population increase since 1971. Community title in that shire has accounted for over fifty percent of development since 1990. The thesis case study is set in Yass Shire. The major research question addressed in the thesis is; does community title, within the context of rural residential development around the Australian Capital Territory, facilitate community-based environmental management and education? Subsidiary questions are; what are the issues in and around rural residential developments within the context of the study, who are the stakeholders and what role do they play and; what skills and support are required to facilitate community-based environmental management and education within the context of the study area? To answer the research questions I undertook an interpretive case study, using ethnographic methods, of rural residential development near the village of Murrumbateman in the Yass Shire, thirty kilometres north of Canberra. At the time of the study, which was undertaken in 1996, the developments involved had been established for about four years. The case study revealed that, as a result of stakeholders and residents not being prepared for the management implications of community title, un-necessary conflict was created between residents and between residents and stakeholders. Community-based environmental management issues were not considered until these issues of conflict were addressed and residents had spent enough time in the estates to familiarise themselves with their environment and with each other. Once residents realised that decisions made by the community association could affect them, there developed a desire to participate in the process of management. Eventually, earlier obstacles were overcome and a sense of community began to develop through involvement in the community association. As residents became more involved, the benefits of having ownership of the community association began to emerge. However, this research found that management of a broad acre rural residential development under community title was far more complicated than any of the stakeholders, or any but the most legally minded residents, were prepared for.

台灣地區數十年來隨著社會經濟的快速發展，都市計畫地區內之人口數，自民國50年以來，平均每年約以7.45%的速度增加。為了滿足日益增加的都市人口活動需求，故需不斷地在有限的都市土地資源上進行開發活動。然而，由於在規劃、組織、管制等方面的不周延，導致土地開發常缺乏計畫性指導原則，產生例如交通擁擠、環境污染、公共設施與開放空間的不足、生態環境的破壞等許多不同性質的問題，而無法真正健全都市的發展，對於都市型態與都市機能亦產生許多的負面效果。 本研究以台灣地區目前公部門常實施之市地重劃與區段徵收為例，藉由文獻資料的整理分析與問卷深入訪談的方式，探討相關的政府承辦人員及專家學者們對於上述兩種土地開發方式所產生的土地開發問題性質之看法。期以美國成長管理理念為基礎，並透過管理的規劃、組織、指導、管制四大功能的分析，提出成長管理策略與相關配合措施之建議，俾指導土地開發活動的進行得以滿足促進都市發展，健全都市機能的目標。 本研究基於上述的理念，對於市地重劃與區段徵收所產生之土地開發問題的分析，研擬適當的成長管理策略，作為政府在土地開發管理上的參考。首先在規劃方面應建立明確的土地開發原則，配合相關技術工具的實行，以指導土地開發活動的進行；在組織方面應加強各相關單位之協調整合；在管制方面則是擬定適當的管制性計畫並透過電腦技術的運用，監測與掌控土地開發的速度與都市發展、公共設施之間的配合；在指導方面則是須有效整合土地開發各相關單位之意見及解決其發生之衝突，清楚界定土地開發相關單位間的權責以達成彼此間的共識。此外，亦須加強民眾在土地開發過程中的參與機制，以爭取民眾的支持而減少土地開發所受到的阻力。 / For decades, Taiwan has experienced rapid social and economic development. Since 1961, the population has increased about 7.45 percent annually in the urban planned districts. In order to accommodate the increasing urban population and activities, it has to develop scarce land resources. However, weakness in existing planning systems, government structure, policy context, and control strategies for managing development and growth has led to many problems, such as traffic congestion, environmental pollution, public facility provision, open space deficiency, and ecological environment destruction. Those problems produce negative impacts on urban development, urban pattern, and urban firnction. Based upon the functions of management, such as planning, organizing, leading, and controlling, this study investigates the problems of urban development in Taiwan, particular in the development by urban land consolidation and zone expropriation programs. The approaches of literature review and questionnaire are adopted in order to understand deeply the problems of land development in Taiwan. Furthermore, the strategies of growth management of American experiences are discussed. Finally, some practical suggestions for land development in Taiwan are presented. This thesis explores the background of existing problems related to urban land consolidation and zone expropriation programs and develop workable growth management strategies and suggestions. First, in planning aspect, government should establish clear land development principles associated with relative technical tools to guide development which is satisfactory in timing, location, and quantity. Second, in organizing aspects, government should bring more about integration and coordination among relative institutions to yield administrative efficiency. Third, as for controlling aspects, government should develop feasible land use plans and apply the computer techniques for monitoring land development pace and service level. Fourth, in leading aspects, government should regulate the clear responsibilities among relevant institutions and resolve the possible conflicts to bring more about consensus. Finally, government should strengthen citizen participation in the land development process to win public support.

土地增值稅對土地變更使用產生之不勞利得，並無法立即課取，其課徵時機仍待土地移轉時。基於漲價歸公理念，本文認為短期內宜建立土地變更使用回饋制度，以輔土地增值稅之不足，而回饋制度建立，其核心在於土地變更使用時發展權價值衡量。鑑於國內土地估價制度尚未健全，本研究乃應用土地變更使用後增加之樓地板面積，估算土地變更使用後之發展潛力，並據以研擬農地變更使用增值利益評估模式，進而搜集相關資料以為實證分析。 　　最後經由本研究得到結論與建議如下： 　　一、結論 　　　（一）增值利益回饋，公私間財產權界定應明確，以減少交易成本。 　　　（二）現行土地變更使用義務負擔係基於土地開發衝擊要求付費，亦或因土地變更使用增值要求歸公共享，法令執行上混沌不清，使土地變更使用負擔義務規定紛亂，造成不公平之課題。 　　　（三）由實證案例中，發現農地變更使用，發展權增值幅度很大，在現行制度下，土地所有權人獲益匪淺，有違平均地權之理想。 　　二、建議 　　　（一）土地變更使用等待土地移轉時，方課取其增值利益，時效上可能過緩，基於地利共享原則，宜健全現行漲價歸公制度之相關措施。 　　　（二）漲價歸公與使用者付費本質上並不相同，在變更使用回饋制度設計上宜予以區分，並對現行紛亂之土地變更使用義務負擔規定，加以統合。 　　　（三）農地變更使用增值利益計算上，在短期內建議以樓地板面積為評估依據。

目前區段徵收乃是政府進行土地開發的方式之一，多用來取得所需之公共設施用地或特定目的事業用地，高鐵桃園車站特定區即採區段徵收方式進行開發，以取得高鐵所需之車站用地。由於現行區段徵收為抵價地式制度，被徵收之地主有領取抵價地與領取現金補償兩種選擇，因此，政府實施區段徵收時，將受到地主不同選擇行為之影響而有不同的辦理成效，使得區段徵收地主選擇行為在徵收辦理過程中，具有決定性的影響力。 　　本研究自土地開發之觀點探討區段徵收地主選擇行為，並著重於選擇行為影響因素之分析。由於相關文獻針對此部分的研究甚少，因此，首先歸納區段徵收地主選擇行為之影響因素，共分為地主屬性因素、政策管制因素及未來期望因素三類，並以高鐵桃園特定區為實證案例，透過問卷調查與Logit模型之建立，分析各項因素對特定區地主選擇行為的影響程度；其次則分析選擇行為的影響效果，以了解區段徵收地主選擇行為之前因後果，並進一步提出政策建議。 　　經由高鐵桃園車站特定區之實證分析，本研究得出以下六點結論： 　　1.大地主傾向領取抵價地，小地主與共有地主傾向領取現金補償，可藉由土地屬性之掌握，預知地主可能的選擇行為。 　　2.公告現值調漲時機關係徵收補償費之支出，並左右地價與市場景氣對選擇行為的影響，政府應先公告實施區段徵收後才發布都市計畫，以減少徵收補償費，提高財務可行性。 　　3.區段徵收地主選擇行為受價值觀之影響大，應考量地主保有祖產價值觀等個人屬性之影響，以預知選擇行為。 　　4.建築基地最小開發規模攸關小地主配地權益與土地開發型態，政府應考量土地規模與使用，訂定合理的建築基地最小開發規模。 　　5.抵價地領回比例與分配區位受公共設施用地規劃之影響，為領地地主改領現金補償的主要原因，可藉由抵價地相關規定誘導地主選擇行為之改變。 　　6.政府辦理區段徵收時，普遍未充分告知計畫內容與相關規定，影響地主權益。 / Zone expropriation is one kind of land development methods through which government can obtain the land for public facilities or specific uses. For example, the development of Taoyuan High Speed Rail station special zone is of this kind. According to zone expropriation system, there are two compensatory choices for landowners. One is by cash and the other is by pay-for-land. Therefore, landowner's choice behavior would play an important role in the process of zone expropriation. 　　With the view of land development, this paper discusses landowner's choice behavior in the process of zone expropriation and focuses on the factors of choice behavior. Here we sum up three kinds of factors that will affect landowner's choice behavior: they are landowner attributes, government regulations, and landowner expectations. According to the empirical study of zone expropriation in Taoyuan High Speed Rail station special zone, this paper has six conclusions: 　　1.Large landowners prefer to choose pay-for-land. On the contrary, small and common landowners prefer cash compensation. 　　2.To reduce the amount of cash compensation, the government should announce zone expropriation more early than urban plan. 　　3.The concept of keeping ancestral estate would influence landowner's choice behavior very much in the process of zone expropriation. 　　4.The development scale would affect the right of small landowners and the form of land development. The government should set a suitable development scale by considering the scale and use of land. 　　5.The assigned proportion and location of pay-for-land is the main reason why landowners with pay-for-land change to choose cash compensation. 　　6.The government seldom informed landowners of the whole plan and the relevant regulations in the process of zone expropriation.

在我國土地開發市場中，開發者應偏好整合坵塊、以大面積土地進行開發，惟相關報導指出臺北市近年以狹小基地開發之鳥籠建案有所增加，遂形成實際與預期不符的矛盾情況。本文從土地供給角度出發，認為除了地價昂貴之外，土地整合成本亦對開發基地規模有決定性的影響，且由於容積獎勵制度的施行，當開發者取得大小足以開發的土地後，可能不再進行土地整合、而改以資本替代之。 為驗證上述推測，本研究以民國83至102年第三種住宅區新建住宅之使用執照存根為基礎，建立開發個案之資料庫；並利用集群分析方法，對開發個案之土地、資本配置型態進行歸納。經過統計，歷年均有近40%的新建住宅屬於基地狹小之鳥籠建案，且集群分析實證結果指出在空間上，市中心至郊區的住宅開發型態呈現單獨小規模開發至整合大規模開發的遞移變化，代表土地整合的難題已長期存在於臺北市住宅開發市場中，其中又以土地較零碎的市中心更為明顯。 此外，本文另以基地面積、公告現值與政策虛擬變數對實際容積率進行線性迴歸，結果顯示整併土地確實有提升容積總樓地板面積的規模經濟效果，但效果卻不如政策性容積獎勵來得明顯；且經過模擬亦得知若欲達到同樣的樓地板面積增量，申請政策性獎勵所需的成本將遠低於進行土地整合。是以在取得合理規模之基地後，土地整合已非必要，再加上多樣化卻缺乏總量管制的容積獎勵，開發者將傾向透過政策性手段來達到擴大資本開發規模之目的，遂造成住宅開發型態呈現空間垂直的成長。 / In Taiwan, land developers are expected to prefer assembling small plots into a large lot for development. However, it is widely reported recently that development projects of building on a small plot have been increasing in Taipei. This phenomenon is inconsistent with the above expectation. From the perspective of land supply, this study argues that apart from land prices, costs of land assembly also have a decisive influence on the lot size for land developments. Also, because of the bulk reward regulations, developers might be less willing to conduct land assembly. Instead, they choose capital intensive means which presented as building high-rise housings once they obtain a site. To verify the argument, this study establishes a database of housing projects based on the residential usage licenses from 1994 to 2013, and observes allocation patterns of land and capital by using cluster analysis. Statistically, there are about 40% of housing projects that were built on plots smaller than 330 m2 every year. The empirical result of cluster analysis shows that housing development patterns change from downtown to suburbs. In downtown area, most developers build houses on a small single plot. However, they assemble plots to get a bigger site in the suburbs. It means that housing development market of Taipei has been entangled by land assembly problems for a long time. This issue explicitly exists in downtown area where lands are much more fragmented. In addition, this study uses site area, current land value and a policy dummy as independent variables and building density as dependent variable to conduct a linear regression. The result shows that, although land assembly increases the floor area, its effect is not as large as that of policy incentives. Based on this result, the comparison analysis of land assembly and policy incentives also points out that the application of bulk reward costs less than land assembly, while they can enjoy the same floor area. Therefore, it is believed that developers tend to choose increasing housing scale by applying bonuses instead of assembling lands. This trend makes the housing development forms vertically expand consequently.

From the Proceedings of the 1977 Meetings of the Arizona Section - American Water Resources Assn. and the Hydrology Section - Arizona Academy of Science - April 15-16, 1977, Las Vegas, Nevada / Extensive disturbances are expected during the remainder of this century due to strip mining in the semi-arid West. Reclamation and revegetation of these disturbed areas is a slow process, primarily due to dry and harsh climatic conditions. Erosion and sediment losses are high. Monitoring of the soil erosion process is a crucial step in planning for a long lasting and stable rehabilitation of these disturbed areas. Erosion plots have been laid out to collect data for the Universal Soil Loss Equation for estimating soil loss from recontoured coal mine spoils. Effectiveness of different cultural and mechanical treatments for erosion control is also being evaluated. Since large-scale coal mining operation has just begun on the Black Mesa, preliminary data could be very effective and useful in Watershed Management planning.