- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 (0.051 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"medborgarjournalistik"" "subject:"kriminaljournalistik""
| 1 |
Hur ofta hamnar hjärtat på agendan? : en kvantitativ och kvalitativ studie av Svenska Dagbladets och Dagens Medicins rapportering om hjärt- och kärlsjukdomarSjöberg, Cecilia, Sjölund, Emmelie January 2012 (has links)
Denna kvantitativa och kvalitativa studie undersöker vilken information om de sju vanligaste hjärt- och kärlsjukdomarna i Sverige, som når allmänheten respektive sjukvården. Syftet är att undersöka och diskutera hur stor täckning varje sjukdom får i Svenska Dagbladet och Dagens Medicin samt möjliga faktorer som kan bidra till att sätta dagordningen inom området hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Studiens centrala forskningsfrågor är därför hur ofta varje hjärt- och kärlsjukdom förekommer som artiklar i respektive tidning, samt vilka skillnader och likheter som finns avseende artiklarnas innehåll och utformning. Den kvantitativa undersökningen omfattar totalt 3 719 artiklar om hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar under tioårsperioden 2002-10-31 till 2012-10-31. Av dessa har 132 artiklar valts ut för en kvantitativ innehållsanalys. Genom att jämföra 66 artiklar i Svenska Dagbladet med 66 artiklar i Dagens Medicin, har vi undersökt hur frekvent artiklar om de olika sjukdomarna förekommer samt vilka källor, perspektiv och vinklar artiklarna har. Genom en kompletterande intervjustudie har vi även velat få journalisters syn på nyhetsvärdering, nyhetsurval och utformning av nyheterna, samt vilka möjligheter de anser sig ha att kunna påverka dagordningar och vilka yttre faktorer som i sin tur kan påverka journalisternas dagordning. Analysen tar teoretiskt avstamp i agenda-settingteorin som menar att de ämnen som får störst utrymme i medierna också blir de mest centrala i publikens medvetanden, men också att publikens vilja och behov återverkar på mediernas val av ämnen. Studiens resultat visar stora likheter mellan tidningarna, vilket vi inte hade förväntat oss. Resultaten från både den kvantitativa och kvalitativa studien visar att både Svenska Dagbladet och Dagens Medicin främst använder forskare och forskningsresultat som källor. Användning av case, det vill säga drabbade individer, var mindre förekommande i Svenska Dagbladet än förväntat, dock något vanligare än i Dagens Medicin vilket däremot stämde med vår hypotes. Det mest anmärkningsvärda resultatet visar att en del hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar får väsentligt mycket mer utrymme än andra, i båda tidningarna. Exempelvis stroke med sammanlagt 1 368 artiklar medan hjärtflimmer endast förekommer med 44 artiklar. Detta trots att omkring 220 000 svenskar lider av hjärtflimmer och att det är en vanlig orsak till stroke. Vår förhoppning är att resultatet av denna studie ska inspirera till vidare forskning om vad en obalanserad medietäckning inom detta område kan få för konsekvenser.
|
| 2 |
Genus & genrer : forskningsanknutna genusdiskurser i dagspressEngström, Kerstin January 2008 (has links)
<p>At the centre of this study lies the question of how research-related media texts contribute to the social construction of sex and gender conceptions when they use research, either as a main source, or to support or comment on specific issues and statements, from the political arena, for example. The principal aim of the study has been to analyze and problematize the ways in which different types of newspapers, genres and editorial sections reproduce, or contribute to change, in existing gender discourses. </p><p> The material was collected from two Swedish newspapers during the year 2001: the national morning paper Dagens Nyheter (DN), and the national evening paper Aftonbladet. </p><p>The theories of discourse, agenda-setting and -framing in this study are related to the questions: what kinds of knowledge on women and men, and biological, physiological, psychological, social and cultural perspectives on sex/gender are represented; how are they described; and how do content and form contribute to the (re)production of, or change in, gender discourses? The main analytical perspectives are those about gender discourse (re)production, genres as ideological forms, and the epistemologies of journalism. </p><p> A combination of analytical strategies and methods was used: content and thematic analysis, and qualitative analysis of text and language with methodological tools from different traditions of discourse analysis. </p><p> In my study, I can see an interplay between research traditions and genre conventions in the (re)production of gender discourses. Since the news sections repeatedly choose to publish research as empiric and in the form of results, and then within that, primarily findings from medicine and the social sciences, these areas are reproduced as important and relevant, and as producers of objective, true knowledge that can be presented as simple facts. Research-related texts in culture journalism, on the other hand, follow the tradition of primarily treating research within the humanities, and nowadays also gender and queer theoretical perspectives within different disciplines. Through the genre conventions of culture journalism, this research is reproduced as something that you can reflect upon, problematize, criticize, form an opinion of, and judge.</p><p> The study also gives reason to argue that media logic and institutionalized genre conventions contribute to the reproduction of science and research as different worlds and cultures, in which the natural sciences and the humanities are found in different media spaces, and different forms of knowledge about sex/gender are given space on different conditions and in different forms. </p>
|
| 3 |
Genus & genrer : forskningsanknutna genusdiskurser i dagspressEngström, Kerstin January 2008 (has links)
At the centre of this study lies the question of how research-related media texts contribute to the social construction of sex and gender conceptions when they use research, either as a main source, or to support or comment on specific issues and statements, from the political arena, for example. The principal aim of the study has been to analyze and problematize the ways in which different types of newspapers, genres and editorial sections reproduce, or contribute to change, in existing gender discourses. The material was collected from two Swedish newspapers during the year 2001: the national morning paper Dagens Nyheter (DN), and the national evening paper Aftonbladet. The theories of discourse, agenda-setting and -framing in this study are related to the questions: what kinds of knowledge on women and men, and biological, physiological, psychological, social and cultural perspectives on sex/gender are represented; how are they described; and how do content and form contribute to the (re)production of, or change in, gender discourses? The main analytical perspectives are those about gender discourse (re)production, genres as ideological forms, and the epistemologies of journalism. A combination of analytical strategies and methods was used: content and thematic analysis, and qualitative analysis of text and language with methodological tools from different traditions of discourse analysis. In my study, I can see an interplay between research traditions and genre conventions in the (re)production of gender discourses. Since the news sections repeatedly choose to publish research as empiric and in the form of results, and then within that, primarily findings from medicine and the social sciences, these areas are reproduced as important and relevant, and as producers of objective, true knowledge that can be presented as simple facts. Research-related texts in culture journalism, on the other hand, follow the tradition of primarily treating research within the humanities, and nowadays also gender and queer theoretical perspectives within different disciplines. Through the genre conventions of culture journalism, this research is reproduced as something that you can reflect upon, problematize, criticize, form an opinion of, and judge. The study also gives reason to argue that media logic and institutionalized genre conventions contribute to the reproduction of science and research as different worlds and cultures, in which the natural sciences and the humanities are found in different media spaces, and different forms of knowledge about sex/gender are given space on different conditions and in different forms.
|
Page generated in 0.0556 seconds