Pesquisas sobre interação entre contingências de treino Pavloviano (PV) e treino operante (OP) têm enfatizado a influência do treino Pavloviano sobre o responder operante, mas não uma interação entre ambos os tipos de condicionamento. Neste trabalho é proposto estudar a interação a partir da combinação dos estímulos de ambas as contingências de treino, de forma que eles atuem simultaneamente como variáveis independentes na produção de um fenômeno comportamental. Para isso, a manipulação da taxa de reforço correlacionada aos estímulos condicional (CS) e discriminativo (SD) e a combinação desses estímulos em procedimentos de discriminação com estímulo composto foram utilizados como estratégias experimentais. No Estudo 1, três experimentos foram realizados com o objetivo de verificar a relação linear entre a taxa de reforço (r) correlacionada aos estímulos e a taxa de resposta (R) em treinos de discriminação com estímulos compostos em ratos. Nos Experimentos 1 (treino PV) e 2 (treino OP), ratos passaram por treino com um estímulo composto AB100% e três estímulos elementais, B50%, C50% e D25%. No Experimento 1 uma solução aquosa de sacarose (SAC) era liberada, como estímulo incondicional (US), em 100% das tentativas de AB100%, em 50% das vezes em B50% e C50% e em 25% das tentativas com D25%, em esquema de tempo variável VT-10s. No Experimento 2 a mesma taxa de SAC correlacionada aos estímulos foi mantida, mas dependeu do responder em esquema variável VI-10 s. Após essa fase, em ambos os experimentos, tentativas de sonda com o estímulo A, em extinção, foi adicionada. As respostas avaliadas foram inserir a cabeça no bebedouro (RIC) no treino PV (Experimento 1) e pressão à barra (RPB) no OP (Experimento 2). No experimento 3, a r na presença do estímulo A100% foi 100% e de B50% e C50% foi 50%. O estímulo avaliado em sonda foi um composto BC. Os resultados dos Experimentos 1 e 2 mostraram que a R da Sonda A foi equivalente à R nos estímulos B50% e C50%, indicando uma relação linear entre r e R (i.e., rA = rAB-rB). No Experimento 3, a R na Sonda BC foi equivalente à R em A100%, indicando somação das taxas de reforço (i.e., rBC = rB + rC). Nos experimentos 4 e 5 (Estudo 2) os treinos PV e OP foram combinados. Ratos passaram por PV e OP na mesma sessão, como o objetivo de verificar a somação da taxa de reforço (i.e., US e Sr) a partir da combinação de CS e SD em condicionamento com estímulo composto. Nas tentativas de OP, RPB em VI-10 s foi seguido por SAC em 100% das vezes nas tentativas com o estímulo A100% e em 50% das vezes em C50%. Nas tentativas de treino PV, o estímulo B50% foi seguido por SAC em 50% das vezes, em VT-10s, com a barra ausente. Após essa fase, os estímulos B50% e um composto BC foram adicionados ao treino por dez sessões, mas apresentados em tentativas de sonda em extinção (Exp. 4); no Experimento 5, foram realizadas sete sessões apenas com a Sonda BC e mais quatro sessões com as Sondas B e BC. Os resultados do experimento 4 indicaram somação entre os estímulos B e C em relação à resposta RIC (R em Sonda BC equivalente à R em A100%), mas não para RPB. No experimento 5, houve ocorrência de somação entre os estímulos B e C em ambos os tipos de treino (R em BC foi equivalente à R em A100%, para ambas as respostas RIC e RPB). Os dados foram discutidos em termos da teoria da estimação da taxa (RET), somação da taxa de reforço envolvendo CS e SD combinados e valor preditivo dos estímulos durante o condicionamento / Researches on Pavlovian-operant training interaction have emphasized the influence of Pavlovian training on the operant responding, but not an interaction between both type of conditioning. In this work, it is proposed to study the interaction through the combination of the stimuli of both training contingencies, so that they act simultaneously as independent variables in the production of a behavioral phenomenon. For this, the manipulation of the reinforcement rate correlated to the conditional (CS) and discriminative (SD) stimuli, and the combination of these stimuli in the procedure of discrimination with compound stimulus were used as experimental strategies. In study1, three previous experiments were carried out with the objective of verifying the linear relationship between the reinforcement rate (r) correlated to stimuli and rate response (R) on compound stimulus discrimination in rats. In Experiments 1 (PV training) and 2 (OP training), rats were trained with a compound stimulus AB100% and three individual stimuli B50%, C50%, and D25%. In PV, the aqueous solution of sucrose (SUC) was delivered as the unconditional stimulus on 100% of trials with AB100%, 50% of times in B50%, and C50% and 25% of trials with D25%, on a variable time schedule VT-10 s. In the OP, the same SAC rate correlated to the stimuli was maintained but depended on the responding on a variable schedule VI-10 s. After this phase, in both experiments, probe trials with the stimulus A, in extinction, was added to each experimental session. The evaluated responses were a head entry (HE) in the PV training and lever pressing (LP) in OP training. In Experiment 3, rats received a similar training to Experiment 2, the stimulus A100% with r of 100% of trials, B50% and C50% with r of 50%. The probe stimulus was a compound BC. The results of Experiments 1 and 2 showed that R of Probe A was equivalent to R in B50% and C50% stimuli, indicating a linear relationship between r and R (i.e., rA = rAB-rB). In Experiment 3 (OP), R in Probe BC was equivalent to R in A100%, indicating summation of the reinforcement rates (i.e., rBC = rB + rC). The Experiments 4 and 5 (Study 2) were carried out with the combination of PV and OP training. Rats were trained in PV and OP procedures in the same session with the objective of verifying summation of reinforcement rates (i.e., US, and Sr) from the combination of CS and SD in conditioning with the compound stimuli. Rats were trained in PV and OP procedures in the same session, with the objective of verifying the summation of the reinforcement rate (i.e., US and Sr) from the combination of CS and SD in compound stimulus conditioning. In OP trials, LP on a VI-10s were followed by SUC on 100% of times in the A100% trials, and 50% of trials with C50%. In PV trials, the stimulus B50% was followed by SUC on 50% of trials on VT-10 s, without the lever. After this phase, B50% stimuli and a BC compound were added in OP contingency for ten sessions, in extinction (Exp 4); in Experiment 5, seven sessions were performed with only the Probe BC and four sessions with Probes BC and B. The results of Experiment 4 indicated evidence for summation in relation to HE (R in BC probe equivalent to R in A100%), but not for LP. In Experiment 5, there was the occurrence of summation in both types of training (R in BC was equivalent to R in A100%, for both HE and LP responses). The data were discussed in terms of Rate Estimation Theory (RET), the summation of the reinforcement rate involving combined CS and SD, and the predictive value of the stimuli during conditioning

In the field of drug addiction, relapse back to drug seeking and taking is the major unmet clinical need. The rate of relapse back to drug-taking is ~70-80% within a year of drug abstinence. Gaining a better understanding of the prolonged neuronal changes that have taken place during drug addiction may lead to the design of better anti-relapse therapies. It is now widely believed that one component of drug addiction is by aberrant learning and memory processes. To study this, we investigated synaptic changes caused by the development of drug-seeking behaviour in C57BL/6J mice. Mice were treated either with non-contingent morphine or trained to exhibit drug-seeking behaviour following morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) training, hippocampal slices were taken from these animals and synaptic changes examined at the CA3-CA1 synapse using electrophysiological methods. Mice that underwent morphine CPP were demonstrated to exhibit a significant preference for the morphine paired compartment before ex vivo electrophysiological analysis. Using field recordings, both non-contingent morphine and morphine CPP treatments resulted in a reduced ability to undergo stimulus-induced LTP compared to their respective controls. Whole cell patch clamp was then utilised to further investigate these effects. Non-contingent morphine treatment resulted in both pre- and post-synaptic changes with an increased AMPA:NMDA receptor ratio, concurrent increases in cell size, and reductions in the release probability of both glutamate and GABA. Morphine CPP treatment resulted in a more variable increase in AMPA:NMDA receptor ratio (presumably by the same mechanism but in a more specific group of neurones) and GABA release probability was also decreased. There were no detected increases in cell size however, or any detected changes in glutamate release probability. These findings therefore reveal a set of synaptic adaptations in the hippocampus unique to morphine-induced behavioural change, and may provide targets for future intervention in drug addiction.

The attribution of incentive salience to cues that become associated with drugs of abuse is a critical characteristic of individuals who may be vulnerable to drug addiction. Rodents with the propensity to sign track are thought to be vulnerable to drug abuse. The goal of the current work was to investigate whether sign trackers (STs) would acquire cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) to a discrete cue using an avian species. In Experiment 1, sign and goal trackers (GTs) were first identified using a one third rank order split. Following identification, cocaine-CPP was conducted with a discrete cue in each end chamber. Contrary to previous research, results showed that GTs showed a CPP to the discrete cue but STs did not. Experiment 2 was conducted to determine whether sign and GTs had been misclassified with the rank order split. Experiment 2 compared the rank order method with a t-test method (absolute criterion). Misclassification of both sign and GTs occurred using the rank order split. The findings indicated that use of a more accurate method to identify sign and GTs may have led to different results for Experiment 1. The t-test method may be useful for models that require identification of STs.

En Europe centrale et, en particulier en Moravie et en Silésie, se forment entre 28.000 - 25.500 BP non calibré des concentrations des sites situés le long d'un corridor naturel, le seul passage reliant l'Europe du Nord et du Sud. Le terme de «Pavlovien» fut créé pour englober ces sites qui avec leur richesse matérielle, sociale, culturelle et symbolique représentent un témoignage extraordinaire de ce que furent les sociétés du Paléolithique supérieur. Afin de revisiter la définition du Pavlovien, nous proposons une nouvelle lecture de leurs industries lithiques. Un examen approfondi réalisé sur des sites classiques mais également sur des sites nouvellement fouillés nous a conduit à proposer une tripartition des ensembles selon leurs caractéristiques éco-typo-technologique (Groupe à microscies, Groupe à microlithes géométriques et Groupe à pointes de Milovice ). Les populations d'au moins de deux de ces groupes semblent être porteuses d'une tradition lithique particulière et d'une culture matérielle riche et révélatrice de comportements sociaux structurés et récurrents qui semble plaider en faveur d'un fort degré d'homogénéité culturelle. / In central Europe, and in particular in Moravia and in Silesia, some concentrations of archaeological sites, dated from 28.000 to 25.500 BP, appeared all way long a natural corridor, which is the only passageway between Northern and Southern Europe. These sites have provided a wide range of artifacts, bringing many data about social, cultural and symbolic aspects of the Upper Paleolithic societies. They are now known as the «Pavlovian complex». In order to refine the definition of the « Pavlovian », this thesis seeks to renew the reading of lithic industries. This study includes both the classical sites and the ones recently excavated. It leads t subdivide the Pavlovian into three mains groups according to their eco-typo-technologica characteristics (the group with microsaws, the group with geometric microliths and the group wit the point of Milovice ). At least two of these groups present specific lithic tradition and an abundan material culture that reveals some social behaviors, both well structured and recurring, which plead in favour of a high level of cultural homogeneity.

No description available.

Le conditionnement Pavlovien, l'acquisition de réponses vers des stimuli neutres associés à des récompenses, et le conditionnement instrumental, l'expression de comportements pour atteindre des buts, sont au cœur de nos capacités d'apprentissage. Ils sont souvent étudiés séparément malgré les preuves de leur enchevêtrement. Les modèles de conditionnement instrumental reposent sur le formalisme de l'apprentissage par renforcement (RL), alors que les modèles du conditionnement Pavlovien reposent surtout sur des architectures dédiées souvent incompatibles avec ce formalisme, compliquant l'étude de leurs interactions.Notre objectif est de trouver des concepts, qui combinés à des modèles RL puissent offrir une architecture unifiée permettant une telle étude. Nous développons un modèle qui combine un système RL classique, qui apprend une valeur par état, avec un système RL révisé, évaluant les stimuli séparément et biaisant le comportement vers ceux associés aux récompenses. Le modèle explique certaines réponses inadaptées par l'interaction néfaste des systèmes, ainsi que certaines différences inter-individuelles par une simple variation au niveau de la population de la contribution de chaque système dans le comportement global.Il explique une activité inattendue de la dopamine, vis-à-vis de l'hypothèse qu'elle encode un signal d'erreur, par son calcul sur les stimuli et non les états. Il est aussi compatible avec une hypothèse alternative que la dopamine contribue aussi à rendre certains stimuli recherchés pour eux-mêmes. Le modèle présente des propriétés prometteuses pour l'étude du conditionnement Pavlovien,du conditionnement instrumental et de leurs interactions. / Pavlovian conditioning, the acquisition of responses to neutral stimuli previously paired with rewards, and instrumental conditioning, the acquisition of goal-oriented responses, are central to our learning capacities. However, despite some evidences of entanglement, they are mainly studied separately. Reinforcement learning (RL), learning by trials and errors to reach goals, is central to models of instrumental conditioning, while models of Pavlovian conditioning rely on more dedicated and often incompatible architectures. This complicates the study of their interactions. We aim at finding concepts which combined with RL models may provide a unifying architecture to allow such a study. We develop a model that combines a classical RL system, learning values over states, with a revised RL system, learning values over individual stimuli and biasing the behaviour towards reward-related ones. It explains maladaptive behaviours in pigeons by the detrimental interaction of systems, and inter-individual differences in rats by a simple variation at the population level in the contribution of each system to the overall behaviour. It explains unexpected dopaminergic patterns with regard to the dominant hypothesis that dopamine parallels a reward prediction error signal by computing such signal over features rather than states, and makes it compatible with an alternative hypothesis that dopamine also contributes to the acquisition of incentive salience, making reward-related stimuli wanted for themselves. The present model shows promising properties for the investigation of Pavlovian conditioning, instrumental conditioning and their interactions.

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a mental disorder that negatively affects personal health and burdens the global health system. Alcohol-attributed harms can also extend beyond the drinkers to other people in the society through increased road traffic accidents and more interpersonal violent behaviors. The effects of this disorder make it crucial to investigate predisposing mechanisms in order to identify at-risk individuals and further develop novel interventions. Although aberrant learning and dysfunctions in decision-making have been observed in individuals with AUD, it is not yet clear whether they predispose the development of risky drinking behaviors or result from repetitive alcohol use. To disentangle this, we studied the drinking behaviors of a community sample comprising participants who were 18–24, which is when the prevalence of alcohol use typically peaks. This thesis investigates whether two types of learning mechanisms—the balance between goal-directed and habitual control and the susceptibility to interference between Pavlovian cues and instrumental behaviors—are associated with the development of risky alcohol drinking behaviors. For Study 1, we assessed how goal-directed and habitual controls at 18 predispose alcohol use development over the course of 3 years. Goal-directed and habitual control, which are informed by model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) learning, were assessed with a two-step sequential decision-making task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Three-year drinking trajectories were constructed based on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C; assessed every 6 months) and a gram/drinking occasion measure (binge drinking score; assessed yearly). Latent growth curve models were applied to examine how the MB and MF controls were associated with the drinking trajectories. We found that MB control was negatively associated with the development of the binge drinking score trajectory. In contrast, MF reward prediction signals in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the ventral striatum (VS) were associated with a higher starting point and a steeper increase/less decrease in AUDIT-C, respectively. For Study 2, we investigated the cross-sectional association between the susceptibility to interference between Pavlovian cues and instrumental behaviors and risky (binge) drinking behaviors at age 18. During a Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) task, the participants were instructed to “collect good shells” and “leave bad shells” while the appetitive (monetary gain) or aversive (monetary loss) Pavlovian cues were presented in the background. The behavioral interference PIT effect was characterized by an increased error rate (ER) during incongruent trials (“collecting good shells” in the presence of an aversive Pavlovian cue or “leaving bad shells” during the presentation of an appetitive Pavlovian cue) in comparison to congruent ones. Overall, the individuals demonstrated a substantial behavioral PIT effect. Neural PIT correlates were found in the VS, dorsomedial, and lateral prefrontal cortices (dmPFC and lPFC, respectively). High-risk drinkers, in comparison to low-risk drinkers, exhibited a stronger behavioral PIT effect, decreased lPFC responses, and increased trend-level VS responses. Moreover, the effective connectivity from the VS to the lPFC during the incongruent trials was weaker for the high-risk drinkers, which indicates that the altered interplay between bottom-up and top-down neural responses may contribute to the poor interference control performance of this group. During Study 3, we further examined whether the susceptibility to Pavlovian cues during conflict trials was associated with the development of drinking behaviors over 6 years from ages 18 to 24. The drinking behaviors were again constructed based on the AUDIT-C and the binge drinking score. The PIT task was assessed at ages 18 and 21. Following Study 2, the increased ER in the incongruent condition compared with the congruent condition (along with the neural responses in the VS, lPFC, and dmPFC during the incongruent trials) were included in the latent growth curve models as predictors. A stronger VS response during a conflict at age 18 was associated with a higher starting point in both drinking trajectories but was negatively associated with the development of the binge drinking score trajectory. At age 21, high ER and enhanced neural responses in the dmPFC were associated with a risky AUDIT-C trajectory that started to emerge and develop until age 24. Through exploratory cluster analyses of the drinking trajectories, we identified two subgroups: the drinking behavior in the 'late riser' group escalated after age 21, whereas the drinking of 'early peakers' culminated at this age and then declined. The late risers displayed enhanced dmPFC responses and higher ER during conflict at age 21. Interestingly, this group also exhibited an increased ER from ages 18 to 21. Taken altogether, the unbalanced goal-directed to habitual control, informed by less MB and more MF control, appears to be a strong predisposing candidate mechanism that underlies the development of risky drinking behaviors during young adulthood. At age 18, the susceptibility to interference between Pavlovian cues and instrumental behaviors was associated with risky drinking behavior. The development of risky drinking behaviors over the 6 years was associated with the behavioral interference PIT effect at age 21 and its change from ages 18 to 21. Researchers could further explore the dynamics in PIT to predict risky drinking behaviors in the future.

Thèse numérisée par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal.

Chez l’espèce humaine comme pour de nombreuses autres espèces animales, lorsque des stimuli environnementaux précèdent de façon régulière la présentation d’événements importants pour un individu, ces stimuli vont acquérir sous certaines conditions la capacité à évoquer des comportements dits d’anticipation. Cette capacité est considérée par de nombreux auteurs comme ayant une haute valeur adaptative, favorisant le contact avec des événements appétitifs et permettant l’évitement d’événements aversifs. Ces dernières décennies, deschercheurs ont initié un rapprochement entre le phénomène d’anticipation et le conditionnement Pavlovien. Ce rapprochement repose à la fois sur une similarité dans les caractéristiques des événements mis en jeux mais surtout sur de nombreux effets et phénomènes semblables, amenant ces auteurs à considérer que les comportements ditsd’anticipation, d’une façon générale, reposeraient sur le processus Pavlovien. Leconditionnement Pavlovien offre une littérature extrêmement riche dont l’une des principalesquestions de recherche concerne le problème des conditions à l’apparition du processus.Parmi les hypothèses existantes, l’Hypothèse de l’Information est sans aucun doute l’une desplus importantes par son influence. Selon cette hypothèse, un apprentissage associatifPavlovien n’aura lieu que lorsqu’un événement important sera présenté de façon inattendu à un sujet, et l’apprentissage, ou les associations apprises, ne porteront que sur des stimuli prédictifs de l’événement important (i.e. permettant son anticipation). A travers deux expériences appliquant une procédure de conditionnement rétrograde à une procédure de renforcement conditionné, nous avons cherché à tester les propositions faites par cette hypothèse. Nos résultats vont directement à l’encontre de ces propositions et vont au contraire dans le sens de deux autres propositions théoriques faites sur le conditionnement Pavlovien,illustrées par le modèle SOP et l’Hypothèse du Codage Temporel. Ces deux propositions sont testées au sein d’une troisième et dernière expérience, dont les implications pour ces modèles comme pour la conceptualisation du conditionnement Pavlovien et de l’anticipation de façon générale sont discutées. / In human and non-human animals, environmental stimuli that reliably accompany the presentation of significant events are able after repeated exposures of eliciting anticipatory behaviors. Many authors underlined the adaptive value of anticipatory responses, and suggested a connection with Pavlovian conditioning. Linking anticipatory behaviors to Pavlovian conditioning is supported by the similarity in procedure (i.e. a pairing between a neutral stimulus with a significant event), but also on the common effects and phenomena, and the authors assume that Pavlovian conditioning is the process underlying the anticipation of events. This assumption is at the heart of the Information Hypothesis, and more generally of a functional and predictive perspective of Pavlovian conditioning. According to the Information Hypothesis, Pavlovian conditioning only occurs when an unexpected significant event is presented, and learning (i.e. the formation of association) would be about stimuli that allow the anticipation of the significant event. Using a backward conditioning procedure in a conditioned reinforcement preparation, we tested the assumptions made by the Information Hypothesis. The results found argue against the Information Hypothesis and, in contrast, support the assumption made by two others types of leaning models, illustrated by the Temporal Coding Hypothesis and the SOP model. The Temporal Coding Hypothesis and SOP are tested in a third experiment. Implications for Pavlovian conditioning models and anticipatory behaviors in general are discussed.

Estudos reportando que a autoadministração repetida de drogas de abuso causa mudanças comportamentais, e na expressão de FosB, diferentes às causadas pela administração passiva repetida da mesma droga, em conjunto com estudos de discriminação de estímulos, têm sido chaves para compreender a dependência às drogas. Neste estudo se apresentam resultados de 3 experimentos que avaliaram diferenças gênicas e comportamentais entre a autoadministração de morfina e cocaína sob uma contingência operante, e a administração passiva destas drogas sob uma contingência Pavloviana, usando um modelo de administração de drogas acoplado e um protocolo de transferência operante-Pavloviana (PIT) seletiva em ratos. Os sujeitos foram distribuídos em três grupos: Administração por Contingência Operante (CO), Administração por Contingência Pavloviana (CP) e Controle (Ctr). No Experimento 1, cada sujeito do grupo CO foi exposto a sessões de autoadministração endovenosa de morfina. Depois, a expressão do gene FosB foi medida utilizando uma técnica imuno-histoquímicas em diferentes áreas do cérebro. No Experimento 2 os ratos foram expostos a um protocolo de PIT, treinando de forma inicial as contingências operante e Pavloviana separadamente, em associação a S1, utilizando infusões de morfina como reforçador. Em seguida foi treinado um encadeado de respostas (busca e administração) e finalmente, os sujeitos foram testados para avaliar o controle de estímulos que S1 adquiriu sobre as respostas de busca e administração. O Experimento 3 foi realizado utilizando os métodos dos primeiros dois experimentos, utilizando cocaína como reforçador. Em conjunto, os dados imunohistoquímicos e comportamentais sugerem que a maior expressão de FosB em subáreas envolvidas na dependência às drogas, em comparação entre os grupos CO e CP, está relacionada ao controle de estímulos estabelecido por S1 pelas diferentes contingências de aprendizagem. Ainda, os resultados apontam que estas áreas em que se encontrou uma expressão de FosB diferencial por diferentes contingências de administração de drogas coincidem com algumas das reportadas como envolvidas na PIT. Os resultados estão em concordância com estudos que reportam que a administração repetida de uma droga em contingências operantes ou pavlovianas alteram diferencialmente estruturas cerebrais envolvidas nos processos da dependência às drogas e apoiam a literatura que reporta que o estabelecimento de controle de estímulos que caracteriza a dependência se pode estabelecer por processos de aprendizagem na contingência operante e Pavloviana / Studies reporting that repeated drug self-administration produces behavioral changes, and in FosB expression, different from those produced by repeated passive administration of the same drug have been very important, together with stimulus control studies, have been the key to understand mechanisms underlying drug abuse. This study presents results from 3 experiments evaluating gene and behavioral differences between self-administration of morphine and cocaine under an operant contingency, and passive administration of these drugs under a Pavlovian contingency, using a yoked drug administration model and a selective Pavlovian to instrumental transfer (PIT) protocol in rats. Subjects were divided into three groups: Operant Contingency Administration (CO), Pavlovian Contingency Administration (CP) and Control (Ctr). In Experiment 1, each subject in the CO group was exposed to intravenous morphine self-administration sessions. Then, expression of FosB gene was measured using an immunohistochemical technique in different areas of the brain. In Experiment 2 rats were exposed to a PIT protocol, initially training the operant and Pavlovian contingencies separately in association with S1, using morphine infusions as a reinforcer. Then a chain of responses (seeking and taking) was trained and finally, subjects were tested to evaluate S1 stimulus control over search and administration responses. Experiment 3 was performed using the methods from the first two experiments, using cocaine as a reinforcer. Together, immunohistochemical and behavioral data interact and suggest that a higher expression on FosB expression in subareas involved in drug dependence, in comparison between CO and CP groups, is related to stimuli control established by S1 through the different learning contingencies. Moreover, results point out these same areas in which different FosB expression was found by different drug administration contingencies match some of those reported as being involved in PIT. Results are in agreement with studies reporting that repeated administration of a drug in operant or pavlovian contingencies differentially alter brain structures involved in drug dependence processes and support literature reporting the establishment of stimulus control characterizing addiction can be establish by learning processes in the operant and Pavlovian contingencies