Die wichtigste Frage der Raumwirtschaftstheorie lautet: Welches sind die Ursachen für die Entstehung, den Bestand und die Wandlungen räumlicher Wirtschaftsstrukturen? Zu den markantesten Strukturen gehören zweifellos Agglomerationen, die nicht auf natürliche Ursachen zurückgeführt werden können. Die Neue Ökonomische Geographie gibt eine Antwort auf die Frage nach den Gründen ihrer Existenz aus einem mikroökonomischen Totalmodell, das unterschiedliche Regionen und Produktionssektoren, heterogene Güter und unterschiedliche Transportkosten berücksichtigt. Das vorliegende Buch verfolgt drei Ziele: Zunächst wird dieses neue Paradigma in einen dogmenhistorischen Zusammenhang mit der traditionellen Raumwirtschaftstheorie und Handelstheorie gestellt. Ferner wird das Basismodell des Ansatzes ausführlich beschrieben und danach kritisch diskutiert. Schließlich werden einige Erweiterungsmöglichkeiten aufgezeigt, die in der Lage sind, einige zuvor genannte Kritikpunkte bezüglich des Grundmodells aufzuheben. / The most important question of regional economics is: What are the reasons for the existence, the growth, and the changes of regional economic structures? Without any doubt, agglomerations which are not based on natural sources belong to the most significant regional structures. The New Economic Geography gives answers - based on a microeconomic total model with different regions and industrial sectors, with heterogeneous goods and different transport costs - to the questions with regard to the reasons of the existence of agglomerations. This book pursues three objectives: First of all, the new paradigm is connected with the historical background of the traditional regional economics and trade theory. Furthermore, the basic model is described in detail and then discussed from a critical point of view. Finally, some possible extensions are introduced, which make it possible to eliminate some criticized elements of the basic model.

The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the impact of the EU’s Structural Fund (SF) policy between 2000-2007 on regional economic growth in Sweden. A regional convergence analysis is performed in order to examine if the SF policy’s overall aim of convergence is reached. Furthermore the study examines the growth of important Structural Fund goal indicators as employment, education and new firm formation in the Objective 1, 2 and 3 areas. The main growth- and convergence theories and their connection to regional policies such as the SF policy is used as the theoretical framework and form the study’s hypothesis. The results show that absolute β-convergence exists between the Swedish urban areas. The growth of the goal indicators show that the Objective 1 and 2 areas, which received most part of the SF support have achieved their aims in increasing employment and new firm creation. In addition the Objective 2 areas have increased their share of population with higher education compared to the areas that did not receive either Objective 1 or 2 support. The Objective 3 areas, which received the least part of the SF support had a lower mean growth in employment than the areas that received no direct Objective 3 support. In addition the urban areas that only received Objective 3 support had a lower growth in share of population with higher education. From the results we can reach the overall conclusion that the positive impact of the SF policy on the goal indicators seem to be the largest in the areas that received most part of the funding. The final conclusion is that the SF are effective in enhancing economic growth in the areas of intervention. / Syftet med denna uppsats är att analysera EU:s Strukturfondspolitiks inverkan på regional ekonomisk tillväxt i Sverige mellan 2000-2007. En regional konvergensanalys utförs för att undersöka om Strukturfondspolitikens övergripande konvergens mål uppnås. Vidare undersöker studien viktiga Strukturfondmålindikatorers tillväxt, såsom sysselsättning, utbildning och nyföretagande, i Mål 1, 2 och 3 områdena. De viktigaste tillväxt- och konvergensteorierna och deras koppling till regional politik, såsom Strukturfondspolitiken används som den teoretiska bakgrunden och formar studiens hypotes. Resultaten visar att absolut β-konvergens existerar mellan de svenska kommunerna. Resultaten för målindikatorernas tillväxt visar att Mål 1 och 2-områdena som har mottagit största delen av Strukturfondsstödet har uppnått sina mål att öka sysselsättningen och starta nya företag. Dessutom har Mål 2-områdena haft en högre ökning av andelen av befolkningen med högre utbildning jämfört med områdena som inte mottog något Mål 1 eller 2-stöd. Mål 3- områdena som har mottagit den minsta delen av Strukturfondsstödet hade en lägre tillväxt av sysselsättning jämfört med de områden som inte mottog något direkt Mål 3-stöd. De områden som enbart mottog Mål 3-stöd hade dessutom en lägre tillväxt av befolkning med högre utbildning. Utifrån resultaten kan vi dra den övergripande slutsatsen att den positiva påverkan av Strukturfondspolitiken på målindikatorerna verkar vara störst i de områden som har mottagit största delen av Strukturfondsstödet. Den slutgiltiga slutsatsen är att Strukturfondspolitiken sannolikt främjar den ekonomiska tillväxten i insatsområdena.

This thesis analyzes the Organization of Black Sea Economic Cooperation and Turkey&#039 / s role in this international organization. This thesis argues that contrary to scholars who view institutional weaknesses of BSEC as the main reason of its failure in achieving sufficient level of cooperation among its members, political problems emanating from member states constitute the main reason of BSEC&#039 / s ineffectiveness as an international organization. There are six chapters of this thesis. Following the introductory first chapter, the second chapter of this thesis examines the factors behind establishment of BSEC and its formation process. In the following three chapters BSEC&#039 / s institutional structure, its issue areas and problems are discussed in detail. The last chapter is conclusion.

<p> </p><p>The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the impact of the EU’s Structural Fund (SF) policy between 2000-2007 on regional economic growth in Sweden. A regional convergence analysis is performed in order to examine if the SF policy’s overall aim of convergence is reached. Furthermore the study examines the growth of important Structural Fund goal indicators as employment, education and new firm formation in the Objective 1, 2 and 3 areas. The main growth- and convergence theories and their connection to regional policies such as the SF policy is used as the theoretical framework and form the study’s hypothesis.</p><p>The results show that absolute β-convergence exists between the Swedish urban areas. The growth of the goal indicators show that the Objective 1 and 2 areas, which received most part of the SF support have achieved their aims in increasing employment and new firm creation. In addition the Objective 2 areas have increased their share of population with higher education compared to the areas that did not receive either Objective 1 or 2 support. The Objective 3 areas, which received the least part of the SF support had a lower mean growth in employment than the areas that received no direct Objective 3 support. In addition the urban areas that only received Objective 3 support had a lower growth in share of population with higher education. From the results we can reach the overall conclusion that the positive impact of the SF policy on the goal indicators seem to be the largest in the areas that received most part of the funding. The final conclusion is that the SF are effective in enhancing economic growth in the areas of intervention.</p><p> </p> / <p>Syftet med denna uppsats är att analysera EU:s Strukturfondspolitiks inverkan på regional ekonomisk tillväxt i Sverige mellan 2000-2007. En regional konvergensanalys utförs för att undersöka om Strukturfondspolitikens övergripande konvergens mål uppnås. Vidare undersöker studien viktiga Strukturfondmålindikatorers tillväxt, såsom sysselsättning, utbildning och nyföretagande, i Mål 1, 2 och 3 områdena. De viktigaste tillväxt- och konvergensteorierna och deras koppling till regional politik, såsom Strukturfondspolitiken används som den teoretiska bakgrunden och formar studiens hypotes.</p><p>Resultaten visar att absolut β-konvergens existerar mellan de svenska kommunerna. Resultaten för målindikatorernas tillväxt visar att Mål 1 och 2-områdena som har mottagit största delen av Strukturfondsstödet har uppnått sina mål att öka sysselsättningen och starta nya företag. Dessutom har Mål 2-områdena haft en högre ökning av andelen av befolkningen med högre utbildning jämfört med områdena som inte mottog något Mål 1 eller 2-stöd. Mål 3- områdena som har mottagit den minsta delen av Strukturfondsstödet hade en lägre tillväxt av sysselsättning jämfört med de områden som inte mottog något direkt Mål 3-stöd. De områden som enbart mottog Mål 3-stöd hade dessutom en lägre tillväxt av befolkning med högre utbildning. Utifrån resultaten kan vi dra den övergripande slutsatsen att den positiva påverkan av Strukturfondspolitiken på målindikatorerna verkar vara störst i de områden som har mottagit största delen av Strukturfondsstödet. Den slutgiltiga slutsatsen är att Strukturfondspolitiken sannolikt främjar den ekonomiska tillväxten i insatsområdena.</p>

In Indonesia, the various mining commodities and the amount of resources and reserves are promising, as evidence there are numerous large-scale mining companies and small-scale mines in operation. In 2014 there were 41 companies that held the CoW (mineral contract of work) and 13 companies active in production; and 76 CCoW (coal contract of work) holders, and 57 companies active in production. As well as this, there are more than a thousand small-scale mining companies active for mining commodities. However, mining commodities provide a resource that is not renewable. This will potentially lead to prolonged problems when mining companies do not adhere to good mining practices, particularly in the closing stages of the mine. Mine closure is the final stage in the process of mining activity. In certain circumstances, closure activities can take a long time and of course can have huge costs. In fact, at this stage, the company is no longer making profit, only incurring costs for the project closure. To prevent problems that may arise after the mine is closed, such as abandoned post-mining land, and the bankruptcy of the company at the end of mining operations, etc., then through specific rules, ie rules of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources No. 18 of 2008, the mining company in Indonesia must provide a certain amount of money as a financial guarantee to finance the planned closure project; it must be approved by the government before entering this phase. However, problems are encountered in practice. The government may become overloaded because they have to quickly make a decision on the closure plan submitted by the company. So a tool is needed that can be used to assess the feasibility as soon as the mine closure plan is proposed by a company, these tools can provide an overview and a variety of options for decision making. In this dissertation methodology was developed to create a systems dynamic model of mine closure. The model developed can be applied to a variety of mining methods and for various mining commodities. The model can be used to determine the closure costs, to choose the closure project-financing scenario, and up to micro and macro economic analysis of mining activities in the region. In the case studies conducted in this dissertation, the best scenario of the mine closure planning is to include the everlasting fund in the form of time deposits, and convert the post-mining land for agriculture. The amount of deposit money is about USD 358,986,500 should be spare at the end of mine production, and the total of mine closure cost to be approximately USD 440,757,384. Agriculture, the economic sector as a substitute for the mining sector, the added value to the GRDP (Gross Regional Domestic Product) is about 0.25 % / a for the province, and 1.68 % for the regency, but the contribution of the mining sector to GRDP was 30% / a at province scale, and 90% / a at regency scale. So that the substitution value is less significant to GRDP growth. However, this scenario is the best scenario among others, due to consideration is the certainty of ecological and economic sustainability. it is the best goal of corporate social responsibility to the environment in the post- mining land.

abstract: In the study of regional economic growth and convergence, the distribution dynamics approach which interrogates the evolution of the cross-sectional distribution as a whole and is concerned with both the external and internal dynamics of the distribution has received wide usage. However, many methodological issues remain to be resolved before valid inferences and conclusions can be drawn from empirical research. Among them, spatial effects including spatial heterogeneity and spatial dependence invalidate the assumption of independent and identical distributions underlying the conventional maximum likelihood techniques while the availability of small samples in regional settings questions the usage of the asymptotic properties. This dissertation is comprised of three papers targeted at addressing these two issues. The first paper investigates whether the conventional regional income mobility estimators are still suitable in the presence of spatial dependence and/or a small sample. It is approached through a series of Monte Carlo experiments which require the proposal of a novel data generating process (DGP) capable of generating spatially dependent time series. The second paper moves to the statistical tests for detecting specific forms of spatial (spatiotemporal) effects in the discrete Markov chain model, investigating their robustness to the alternative spatial effect, sensitivity to discretization granularity, and properties in small sample settings. The third paper proposes discrete kernel estimators with cross-validated bandwidths as an alternative to maximum likelihood estimators in small sample settings. It is demonstrated that the performance of discrete kernel estimators offers improvement when the sample size is small. Taken together, the three papers constitute an endeavor to relax the restrictive assumptions of spatial independence and spatial homogeneity, as well as demonstrating the difference between the small sample and asymptotic properties for conventionally adopted maximum likelihood estimators towards a more valid inferential framework for the distribution dynamics approach to the study of regional economic growth and convergence. / Dissertation/Thesis / Doctoral Dissertation Geography 2018

Orientador: Francisco Luiz Cazeiro Lopreato / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Economia / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-10T10:08:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Vieira_DaniloJorge_M.pdf: 3998304 bytes, checksum: 6938562babd230de9f35cbc8b4b6d12e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 / Resumo: O trabalho aborda as conseqüências do ajuste das finanças estaduais efetuado a partir da renegociação da dívida pública, promovida ao amparo da Lei 9.496/1997, sobre a capacidade de implementação de políticas autônomas de fomento por parte dos estados. Demonstra, de início, que os novos parâmetros de gestão fiscal estabelecidos no bojo do processo de ajustamento, aprofundados posteriormente por meio da promulgação da LRF, fizeram emergir fortes restrições, implicando na desarticulação daquelas políticas, que perderam substância e espaço no âmbito dos orçamentos. A partir da análise mais detalhada da experiência de Minas Gerais, verifica, primeiramente, o impacto que tal reordenamento fiscal e financeiro teve para as finanças públicas. Avalia, em seguida, os desdobramentos sobre as estratégias levadas adiante pelo governo mineiro para apoiar a estrutura produtiva local, descrevendo as mudanças pelas quais passaram as diretrizes de atuação e os instrumentos de estímulo manejados, que se tornaram muito mais contidos, obscurecendo as perspectivas de crescimento e modernização da base econômica instalada na região. Conclui que a nova institucionalidade emergente a partir da renegociação da dívida problematizou a evolução dos desequilíbrios econômicos regionais, uma vez que a desestruturação das políticas fomentadoras dos estados ¿ que ocuparam, ainda que de maneira deficiente, a lacuna deixada pelas ações do governo central ¿ não foi acompanhada por uma presença mais incisiva da União. Assim, o ajuste fiscal deixou como saldo possibilidades bem mais opacas de retomada de um novo ciclo expansivo e resultou, em verdade, no debilitamento amplificado da atuação conjunta do setor público, que adquiriu feições bem mais acanhadas a favor do crescimento, empalidecendo as perspectivas de desenvolvimento regional / Abstract:This research analyze the consequences of the adjustment of the states finances, promoted by agreement of the public debt (supported in Law 9.496/1997), for the capacity of the states for implementation of regional development policies. It demonstrates that the established new fiscal parameters in the process of the adjustment, fortified later with the LRF (¿Fiscal Responsibility Law¿), resulted in very restrictions, implying in the rupture of those policies and, thus, in the her loss of substance and of space in the budgets. From the more detailed analysis of the experience of Minas Gerais's state, it verifies, first, the impact that such fiscal and financial adjustment had for the public finance. After this discussion, it evaluates the impact on the used strategies by the government of Minas Gerais to stimulate the local productive structure, describing the changes in the directives and in the used instruments to promote the growth, showing that these had been contained, weakening the possibilities of development of the economic base installed in the region. In the conclusion, it calls the attention that the resultant fiscal order of the adjustment process had consequences for the evolution of the regional economic inequalities, because it weakened the development policies of the states, but without establishing, at the same time, a more strong action of the central government in the attack to the regional inequalities / Mestrado / Economia Regional e Urbana / Mestre em Desenvolvimento Econômico

Através de dois artigos -- um de revisão bibliográfica e um empírico --, este trabalho analisa a opinião pública mexicana sobre os efeitos do NAFTA -- Tratado Norte-Americano de Livre Comércio -- em 2010, após 16 anos de sua entrada em vigor. Explora-se o caso mexicano com o objetivo de se alcançar uma compreensão mais atualizada sobre como as populações latino-americanas respondem aos efeitos de uma das facetas da reestruturação neoliberal -- os acordos regionais de comércio --, superado o traumático impacto inicial sobre a estrutura de produção e de consumo dos países. Tendo em vista que o tema da opinião pública ainda é alvo de críticas e centro de um caloroso debate dentro das comunidades acadêmicas e das esferas de poder político, e que sua utilização, tanto para fins de pesquisa acadêmica quanto para justificação de políticas públicas, ainda é questionada, o primeiro artigo se apoia em prática e evidências científicas para demonstrar que a opinião pública é um fenômeno estável, mensurável e, em última instância, previsível. Estabelece-se neste primeiro artigo uma revisão bibliográfica e uma agenda para a análise da relação entre opinião pública e política externa. Justificada a utilização da opinião pública como evidência científica concreta e confiável, parte-se no segundo artigo, através de uma sondagem de opinião pública realizada em 2010, à análise dos níveis de avaliação dos efeitos do NAFTA e as diferenças nestes níveis entre os distintos estratos sociais mexicanos em um estudo transversal. Busca-se através desta abordagem uma maior elucidação e esclarecimento sobre os efeitos econômicos e, principalmente, sociais do NAFTA na população mexicana, visto que desde sua entrada em vigor há bastante divergência sobre os mesmos. Primeiramente, abordam-se os pressupostos teóricos para a compreensão do significado histórico, econômico e social do NAFTA, para então se analisar os dados e se realizar o estudo transversal de associação entre a avaliação do público dos efeitos do acordo e algumas variáveis demográficas -- sexo, idade, escolaridade e região -- e partidárias -- lealdade partidária. Com base nesta análise, concluir-se-á que o trauma econômico inicial com a aceleração de tendências provocada pelo NAFTA foi, em grande parte, superado: 62,8% dos mexicanos acreditam que o acordo regional de comércio foi muito ou algo benéfico ao país; entretanto, a partir da realização do estudo transversal, depreende-se que essa aprovação não é compartilhada -- pelo menos não em tamanha intensidade -- por todos os estratos da sociedade mexicana: a associação mais forte encontrada é com a região geográfica do país. As percepções sobre os efeitos do acordo foram bastante diferenciadas entre a região norte industrializada, onde ele promoveu desenvolvimento e distribuição de renda, e a região sul agrária, onde ele intensificou a pobreza e a desigualdade social. / Through two papers -- a literature review and an empirical analysis -- this research examines the Mexican public opinion on the effects of the NAFTA -- North American Free Trade Agreement -- in 2010, 16 years after its entry into force. The Mexican case is explored in order to achieve a more updated understanding on how the Latin American populations respond to one of the neoliberal restructuring facets -- the regional trade agreements --, overcomed the initial traumatic impact on the production and consume structure of these countries. Bearing in mind that the theme of public opinion is still target of criticism and center of a heated debate within the academic communities and spheres of political power, and that its use, both for academic research purposes and for reasons of public policy, is still questioned, the first paper is based on experience and scientific evidence to demonstrate that public opinion is a stable, measurable and ultimately predictable phenomenon. It is established in this first paper a literature review and an agenda for the analysis of the relationship between public opinion and foreign policy. Justified the use of public opinion as a concrete and reliable scientific evidence, the second paper analyzes, using a public opinion survey held in 2010, the levels of assessment on the effects of the NAFTA and the differences in these levels among the different strata in Mexican society through a cross-sectional study. The aim of this approach is to achieve a further elucidation and clarification on the economic and, especially, social effects of the NAFTA on the Mexican population, since there is much disagreement about such effects. At first, the theoretical assumptions are addressed in order to explain the historical, economical and social significance of the NAFTA, then the data is analyzed and it is carried out the cross-sectional study of association between the public\'s assessment of the effects of the agreement and some demographic variables -- sex, age, education and region -- and partisan variables -- party loyalty. Based on this analysis, it will be concluded that the initial economic trauma due to the acceleration of trends caused by the NAFTA was largely surpassed: 62.8% of Mexicans believe that the regional trade agreement was somewhat or very beneficial to their country; however, through the cross-sectional study, it emerges that such approval is not shared -- at least not so intensively -- by all strata of the Mexican society: the strongest association is found within the geographic region variable. Perceptions on the effects of the agreement were quite different between the industrialized north, where it promoted development and income distribution, and the agrarian south, where it intensified poverty and social inequality.

This study contributes to the debate surrounding the suitability of Regional Economic Community (REC) courts as avenues for protection of human rights in view of the economic focus of RECs. Recommends adjustments that can be made within the African Human Rights System (AHRS) to deal with the challenges associated with the development of REC courts both in the interim and in the long-term. / A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Law University of Pretoria, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Law (LLM in Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa). Prepared under the supervision of Dr. Jacqui Gallinetti, Faculty of Law, University of Western Cape. / LLM Dissertation (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa -- University of Pretoria, 2009. / http://www.chr.up.ac.za/ / Centre for Human Rights / LLM

This paper aims at contributing to the debate about Japan’s leadership capabilities. Lately, scholars from all around the world have referred to Japan as the “new leader of free trade”. This comes as a surprise, as the country has always been the archetype of a passive and mercantilist state. Therefore, what role is Japan playing in contemporary free trade agreements? What leadership style, if any, is the country exercising? What changes has Japanese leadership experienced in the last decades? Testing theories of this kind is challenging because there is limited information on the topic and most of it is only available in the language of the country in matter. Drawing on a case study based on the role of Japan in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership and analyzing it from Young’s framework on political leadership, this article concludes that Japan is exercising a leadership role in contemporary FTAs.