Global ETD Search

1	Tolkning av barnets bästa i vårdnadstvister särskilt i mål T 11396-17 / Interpretation of the principle best interests of the child in custody disputes especially in case T 11396-17 Augustsson, Sandra, Eriksson, Lovis January 2019 (has links) A child's best interest is a subject that affects many people, not least in custody battles. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and national legislation in, for example, the Children and Parents Code aims to protect and strengthen children's legal status in society and in custody disputes. Despite this, the number of custody disputes increases and it is the children who are most affected by the parents' conflicts. It is not always easy for the court to determine what is a child's best interest in an objective manner. Often there is a certain degree of subjectivity in the assessment. Many times, different interests, which the court has to decide on, conflict with each other. Through the legal doctrinal method, we have described the source of law and reported the applicable law in relation to the legal provisions relevant to the thesis. We have chosen to start from a recently settled and reported court case to investigate the problem and the complexity of determining the child's best interests when several factors play a role. In the current court case, the joint custody was dissolved and the father was entrusted with sole custody custody even though he was previously convicted of assault by both children and did not meet it for five years, because the mother failed to ensure that the children had had contact with their father and thus committed so-called visitation interference. The Court considered that the risk of children growing up without the right of both their parents weighed heavier than the principle of continuity, which otherwise is strongly rooted in practice. Through this investigation, and particularly by having the opportunity to examine the large volume of documents received from the Court, we have gained a deeper understanding of the Court of Appeal's judgment even though we do not agree with its correctness in all parts. Review dispensation was denied by the Supreme Court, but our personal opinion is that more guidance is needed on the subject for the future. The legislator has proposed how the child's best interests through a legislative amendment should be further strengthened, this by the principle of not only expressing decisions concerning the child but also having an impact on all issues concerning the child in custody purposes. Barnets bästa mål T 11396-17 vårdnadstvist familjerätt umgängessabotage barnmisshandel riskbedömning socialnämnden SOU 2017:6 familjerätten kapitel 6 föräldrabalken. Law and Society Juridik och samhälle
2	Barnrättsperspektiv i vårdnadsmål vid risk för separationsvåld eller så kallat ”eftervåld” : En studie om rättens avvägning mellan skydd för barn och barns rätt till en nära och god kontakt med båda föräldrarna / The children rights perspective in custody cases in case of risk of separation violence or so-called ”post-separation violence” : A study of the court's balance between protection of children and children's right to close and good contact with both parents Chavez Lupe, Lynette, Falk, Stina January 2022 (has links) It's a misconception that those who leave a violent relationship are safer than those who stay. For those who have children with their perpetrator there is an increased risk for post-separation violence (Fleury, Sullivan & Bybee, 2000). The aim of this study has been to examine the child rights perspective through how the court judges and resonates in custody disputes with information regarding violence and therefore a possible risk for post-separation violence. Data was retrieved in the form of 34 custody cases from the court of appeal. In order to fulfil the purpose of the study a multi-method investigation has been used, both a quantitative content analysis and a discourse analysis. The results showed that the parent who was mainly referred to as the perpetrator was assigned visitation rights in 64.4 % of the cases, joint custody in 46.6 % and housing in 20 %. The main result showed that the courts ruled the child’s right to close and good contact with both parents outweighs the risk of post-separation abuse, either towards the other parent or the child himself. Children should be allowed to grow up with both parents. However, one could question at what price. Separation violence post-separation violence exposed to violence exposed violence post divorce children in domestic violence post divorce parenting child rights perspective custody cases custody disputes best interest of the child the child's claim intimate partner violence IPV child affected family conflict family dispute court of appeal witnessing violence victim of violence family violence child rights children's rights custody battle post separation post-separation dispute domestic violence domestic violence after separation false allegations false allegations in custody battle parental alienation family violence separation assault involving children Separationsvåld eftervåld barnrättsperspektiv vårdnadsmål vårdnadstvister barnets bästa barnets utsaga barnperspektiv våld i nära relationer vårdnadsmål socionom socialt arbete familjerätt barnrätt diskursanalys kvantitativ innehållsanalys separation familjekonflikt barnets vilja umgängessabotage föräldraalienation samarbetssvårigheter vårdnadskonflikt barnets påverkan barnkonventionen föräldrabalken risk för eftervåld risk för seprationsvåld hovrättsdomar bevittna våld våldsutövare använda barn som redskap använda barn som verktyg falska uppgifter falska uppgifter om våld uppgifter om våld falska anklagelser vårdnadstvister falska anklagelser föräldraalienation våld i hemmet våld i nära relationer umgängesrätt gemensam vårdnad vårdnad boende umgänge våldsutsatt hovrätten föräldrarätt Social Work Socialt arbete

Search results

Tolkning av barnets bästa i vårdnadstvister särskilt i mål T 11396-17 / Interpretation of the principle best interests of the child in custody disputes especially in case T 11396-17