No description available.

本論文共一冊，約六萬餘元，茲略述各章內容如下： 第一章「緒論」，本章首先說明賦的諷喻作用，繼而由此指出賦彙喻類設類所造成之 困擾。 第二章「諷喻類賦篇真偽及其作者之研究」，本章分為二節，第一節討論宋玉之生平 ，及標曰宋玉所著各賦之真偽；第二節則依序對其餘諸位賦家之生平加以探究。 第三章「諷喻類賦篇內容之探討」，本章將諷喻類賦篇之題材加以歸納，分為七項， 然後逐項立節，分析說明。 第四章「諷喻類賦篇形式之探討」，本章分為四節，由謀篇、章法、句式、修辭等方 面，對諷喻類之形式加以討論。 第五章「賦彙諷喻類設類之商榷」，本章分為兩節，第一節以探討歷代總集對賦篇之 分類為主，第二節則將諷喻類所收之賦篇重新歸類，章末再根據以上兩節之分析，對 諷喻之設類，作一商榷。 第六章「結論」，本章承襲前述，對本論文所探討之問題作一總結，並由作品本身肯 定諷喻類賦篇之價值。

本論文以鄭玉思想為主題，意在透過個案研究來定位鄭玉在中國思想史上的歷史地位。全文以鄭玉思想的特質為主要切入點，依序探究鄭玉的儒學思想內涵、實踐的起點與價值、對思想史上「朱陸會同」課題的貢獻。鄭玉儒學思想的內涵有對先秦儒學、宋儒的繼承，亦有對宋儒思想的修正。他側重的儒學問題大多圍繞在倫理問題與個人修身成德的部分，同時，他對於人事之理的興趣大於對形上之理的興趣。鄭玉以「傳經之道」自任，心中理想的士人形象是「不以隱約而弗務」的仁者，而士人成德的關鍵取決於「盡心盡性」、「能知能行」，為世為民的應世態度。最後，本文將「朱陸會同」問題獨立一章，以謹慎的態度考證出鄭玉對朱、陸兩家學術抱持著「思同不辨異」的態度。因為「朱陸會同」是南宋以後才出現的新問題，所以鄭玉在此問題上的發揮直接影響到明代儒者「合同」與「辨異」的發展。鄭玉在思想史上兼有延續傳統、開展新題之功，在討論宋、明間的學術樣貌之時，鄭玉的歷史地位值得被重新認識。 關鍵詞：鄭玉　元代　儒學　朱陸

段玉裁為清代乾嘉學術的代表學者，對《說文解字》研究有重大貢獻。梁啟超《清代學術概論》認為「玉裁所著書，最著者曰《說文解字注》，《六書音均表》。」學界大都把研究焦點放在《說文解字注》。然而，撰寫此書前，茂堂先撰寫《詩經小學》三十卷等書。《詩經小學》三十卷一書為茂堂較前期著述，實可了解茂堂治學之基礎。然學界對於《詩經小學》三十卷一書之研究，實寥寥可數。因此，為補充學界不足，本文以《詩經小學》三十卷一書作為主要研究對象。本文的主要研究目的有三項一，通過《詩經小學》三十卷比較段玉裁相關著述意見之異同；二，比較《詩經小學》三十卷及出土《詩經》材料；三，判斷茂堂之見是否可從。本文第二章通過《詩經小學》三十卷比較《毛詩故訓傳定本小箋》、《說文解字注》校勘意見，論證茂堂校勘方面的意見並非一成不變。茂堂所論或有可取處，或有斟酌處。第三章比較《詩經小學》三十卷及《詩經小學》四卷本文字意見，發現《詩經小學》三十卷所引石鼓文往往有可商之處。第四章通過《詩經小學》三十卷比較《六書音均表》及《說文解字注》聲韻意見，探討三書聲韻意見之異同，論述各書可取及不足之處。第五章通過《詩經小學》三十卷比較《毛詩故訓傳定本小箋》、《說文解字注》訓詁意見之分歧，探討《詩經小學》三十卷一書於釋詞方面的特色。第六章比較《詩經小學》三十卷及出土《詩經》材料，分辨可取及值得斟酌之意見。最後總結《詩經小學》三十卷在段學及《詩經》學上的意義及該書不足之處。=Being one of the eminent scholars of The Qian Jia School (Qian Jia xuepai 乾嘉學派) in the Qing Dynasty, Duan Yuchai (1735-1815) makes significant contribution to the study of Shuowen jiezi (Explaining single-component graphs and analysing compound characters) and his work was highly praised by his contemporaries. Liang Qichao in his Qingdai Xueshu Gailun (Introduction to the Intellectual Trends in the Qing Period) states that “the two important books written by Yuchai are Shuowen jiezi Zhu (The Annotation on Shuowen jiezi) and Liu-shu Yin-yün Biao (The Study of the Six Categories of the Formation of traditional Chinese characters and Palaeographic Phonology). Modern scholars pay more attention to the study of Shuowen jiezi Zhu. However, Duan Yuchai first basically completed the writing of the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue prior to the completion of the work Shuowen jiezi Zhu. Duan Yuchai wrote the the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue during the early stage of his research on classical and etymological studies. By looking into this work, we can have a better understanding of Duan’s fundamental studies on the above-mentioned areas. To date, little research has been done on the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. Therefore, this thesis focuses on the study of the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. There are three aims of this thesis: First, compare the similarities and the differences in terms of Duan’s palaeological principles through the study of the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue; second, compare the palaeological findings between the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue and the excavated texts of Shijing; third, criticizing Duan’s theories to see whether his point of view can be applied in our research. This thesis consists of seven chapters. Chapter One is the Introduction. By studying Mao Shi Gu Xun Chuan Ding Ben Xiao Jian and Shuowen jiezi zhu with reference to the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. Chapter Two demonstrates that Duan showed his flexibility in textual problem solving. The study of Duan’s principles on textual criticism is used for our further discussion. Chapter Three shows that the Stone Drum Inscriptions quoted in the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue require further investigation by comparing the Inscriptions used in the four and the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. Chapter Four discusses the similarities and the differences of the three books, namely the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue, Liu-shu Yin-yün Piao and Shuowen jiezi zhu in terms of Duan’s perspectives on phonology. Chapter Five compares Duan’s views on Chinese semantics in Mao Shi Gu Xun Chuan Ding Ben Xiao Jian and Shuowen jiezi zhu with reference to the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue, exploring Duan interpreted traditional Chinese lexicons in the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue. Chapter Six distinguishes whether the theories are applicable or need further consideration by comparing the palaeological data between the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue and the excavated texts of Shijing. Chapter Seven points out the significance and shortcomings of Duan’s the thirty volumes of Shijing Xiaoxue and its value on the study of Shijing.

本論文係以「原本玉篇」殘卷為對象，擇該書所引述「說文」與今傳「二徐本說文」 二者之間，正其是非，題曰：「原本玉篇引述唐以前舊本說文考異」。文都二十萬言 ，本論析為七章，係以「原本玉篇」所存七卷作為區分，其前為緒論，其後乃結語。 所用「原本玉篇」之材料，乃日本「東方文化叢書第六」之複製本，不足者以羅振玉 及楊守敬刊本補足之，並輯入少數他書所存錄者；總存字二０九二字，所引述「說文 」者，凡一二六一條，引者八二一條，述者四四０條，其引「說文」之八二一條中， 與今「二徐本說文」相較而合者，唯二六０條耳，其異者達五六一條。考校之結果， 今「二徐本說文」是而「原本玉篇」非者，固亦有之，然今本誤者則佔絕大部份，可 見「原本玉篇」之可貴也。今「二徐本說文」之誤，就說解言：有形誤者、音誤者、 誤倒者、誤置者、誤羨者、竄入者、漏奪者；甚收字：有失數者、誤增者、誤合者、 誤分者、誤置部首者，亦有形體 謬者。而尤要者，則可知今「二徐本說文」亦有據 「原本玉篇」而改竄之痕跡也。

吳文忠. / 稿本(電腦打印本) / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學硏究院中國語文學部. / Gao ben (dian nao da yin ben) / Includes bibliographical references (leaves [1-15] (2nd group)). / Wu Wenzhong. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue yan jiu yuan Zhongguo yu wen xue bu. / Chapter 第一章： --- 緒言 --- p.1-23 / Chapter （一） --- 段玉裁生平簡介 --- p.1-3 / Chapter （二） --- 段玉裁研究古音之成就及其理論之特點 --- p.3-16 / Chapter （三） --- 諸家對段玉裁古音學及《說文》學之評價 --- p.16-19 / 註釋 --- p.19-23 / Chapter 第二章： --- 段玉裁《說文解字注》中所見之音韻學理論 --- p.25-89 / Chapter （一） --- 古音十七部之制定 --- p.25-30 / Chapter （二） --- 凡某聲皆有某義 --- p.30-37 / Chapter （三） --- 關於詮釋訓詁(單指音謂方面)之條例 --- p.37-50 / Chapter （四） --- 本音與音轉 --- p.51-55 / Chapter （五） --- 合韻 --- p.55-66 / Chapter （六） --- 正韻、變韻 --- p.66-70 / Chapter （七） --- 聲調之問題 --- p.70-77 / Chapter （八） --- 其他關於音之術語 --- p.77-82 / 註釋 --- p.83-89 / Chapter 第三章： --- 段玉裁以古音理論更訂《說文解字》 --- p.98-155 / Chapter （一） --- 利用古音理論訂正《說文》各家版本 --- p.94-110 / Chapter （二） --- 明字形之混訛及傳寫訛誤 --- p.111-117 / Chapter （三） --- 辨別形近之字 --- p.117-139 / Chapter （四） --- 分辨形聲與會意 --- p.139-150 / Chapter （五） --- 以聲調理論分析古今字 --- p.150-153 / 註釋 --- p.154-155 / Chapter 第四章： --- 以聲韻角度解釋《說文》 --- p.156-195 / Chapter （一） --- 解釋正篆與重文(古文、籀文、俗體)之關係 --- p.161-173 / Chapter （二） --- 解釋讀若音與正箓篆音之關係 --- p.174-193 / 註釋 --- p.195 / Chapter 第五章： --- 《說文解字注》與經傳說解之關係 --- p.196-216 / Chapter （一） --- 段氏引經傳注家解釋字音 --- p.196-202 / Chapter （二） --- 引經傳諸家注音證《說文》字音 --- p.203-206 / Chapter （三） --- 以《說文》解釋經傳之通假 --- p.206-211 / Chapter （四） --- 以音韻理論解釋經傳 --- p.211-214 / 註釋 --- p.216 / Chapter 第六章： --- 對段玉裁古音學理論的評價 --- p.217-386 / Chapter （一） --- 關於古今語音發展的規律 --- p.217-226 / Chapter （二） --- 關於古音十七部的創製 --- p.227-245 / Chapter （三） --- 「凡某聲皆有某義」說之可靠性 --- p.246-301 / Chapter （四） --- 段氏《說文注》所標古韻韻部缺部補正 --- p.302-350 / Chapter （五） --- 對段玉裁「假借」理論看法的評價 --- p.351-357 / Chapter （六） --- 段玉裁就《說文注》中所言之「雙聲」 --- p.358-381 / 註釋 --- p.382-386 / Chapter 第七章： --- 總結 --- p.387-407 / 註釋 --- p.407

司徒嘉明. / 手稿本, 據手稿本影印. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學硏究院中國語文學部. / Shou gao ben, ju shou gao ben ying yin. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 715-744). / Situ Jiaming. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue yan jiu yuan Zhongguo yu wen xue bu. / Chapter 一 --- 說文段注所稱某行某廢綜論　 --- p.1-75 / Chapter I --- 段說某行某廢之理論 --- p.1-9 / Chapter II --- 段注後諸家輯錄說文廢字槩況 --- p.10-18 / Chapter III --- 段說某行某廢之分類及畧說 --- p.19-65 / Chapter IV --- 總結 --- p.66-68 / Chapter 二 --- 說文段注所稱某行某之分論 --- p.76-403 / Chapter I --- 通叚字行本字廢　　 --- p.76-362 / Chapter II --- 借字行後起正字廢 --- p.363-402 / Chapter III --- 音義相同之行廢　 --- p.404-495 / Chapter IV --- 古籀行小篆廢　 --- p.496-505 / Chapter V --- 或體行本字廢 / Chapter VI --- 俗字行本字廢 / Chapter VII --- 孳乳字行本字廢　 --- p.554-624 / Chapter VIII --- 孳乳字廢本字行 --- p.625-661 / Chapter IX --- 誤字行本字廢　 --- p.662´ؤ668 / Chapter X --- 其他 --- p.669´ؤ690 / Chapter 三 --- 附錄 / 張舜徽說文解字約注論說文之行廢字 --- p.691-714 / Chapter 四 --- 參考書目及論文　 --- p.715-744

本論文凡一冊，約計十五萬字。正文部分，除緒論，結論外，共七章─上篇四章，下 篇三章。上篇略依時間與質材，分述殷、周文字書寫所應用之工具，以及應用範圍、 用字現象等，所依據者有二：一為古籍載辭，一為近世出士之實物，其內容涉及甲骨 文、金文、玉石文與簡帛文。至於下篇所敘，則依據上篇之各個探討，歸結於漢字之 本質和發展趨向，並深揭上古文字演進之背景，末則結穴於秦代之統一文字。換言之 ，上篇乃下篇之基礎。 當代對古文字之研究，成果粲然。但多傾向小專題，優點為深入，唯不免忽略文字發 展之整體性。本文即有鑑於茲，期能略補其憾。

研究漢語詞義的學者一向對「詞義引申」十分重視。為求建立理論，學者常取段玉裁《說文解字注》所述的詞義引申作為研究起點。後人亦在段氏的基礎上提出了不少引申規律。為了達到以簡馭繁的效果，本文在前人研究基礎之上，運用核心義理論，考察段注所述引申條目中透露的核心義，目的是深入了解段若膺的詞義觀念，並嘗試更深入探討核心義理論。文章中運用的理論工具，揉雜了傳統訓詁學的觀點，亦引進了西方現代語義學的理論，務求為詞義引申之學開拓新視野和新研究空間。 / 本文以段注的引申條目為研究對象。論文主要分為五個部分： / 第一部分是導論， 簡述前人對段注所述詞義引申的研究成果，分析其不足，指出可以運用最新的核心義理論，以簡馭繁地掌握多義詞。 / 第二部分介紹本研究運用的研究理論與方法， 解釋研究中運用到的詞義概念，分析段注揭示核心義的方式，並說明本研究使用詞義系統分類。 / 第三部分是本研究的主體，從段注中擷取210條條目，逐一把段氏之說跟義位作比對、分析，以確定該詞的核心義，並把核心義貫穿義位的方式以圖表展示。 / 第四部分建基於第三部分的研究成果，嘗試深入討論核心義理論，例如指出核心義的本質、變化，歸納推求核心義的方法，考察核心義制約引申的情況，說明研究意義作用等等。 / 第五部分是總結和展望 ，總結段注對我們研究核心義有怎樣的啟發，亦期望豐富對段注之研究。此外還檢討本研究尚有待討論之處，以待將來深入研究。 / This research paper belongs to the subjects of both Exegesis and Semantics. One prominent research field under these two subjects is the Extension of Meaning. There have been many scholars studying Duan Yucai’s book, Shuo wen jie zi zhu, which has had a great achievement in studying the Extension of Meaning, and expatiated many theories. With a view to having a good grasp of Mr Duan’s concept of meaning of words, Core Meaning Theory, is used to study how Shuo wen jie zi zhu explains the rationale behind the Extension of Meaning. It is hope that this research paper can provide a better understanding of Core Meaning Theory and form a solid background for the research of Extension of Meaning in the future. / This paper focuses on the clauses of extended meanings in the Shuo wen jie zi zhu and it consists of five parts. / Part one is the introduction. Starting with the research history of Shuo wen jie zi zhu, it illustrates that these researches are inadequate to comprehend Mr Duan’s rationale behind the explanation of Extension of Meaning. Using Core Meaning Theory is therefore very significant in simplifying this complicated rational. / Part two introduces the theory and the method used in this paper, as well as some concepts of semantics. How Mr Duan acknowledged the Core Meaning in his book is also analyzed, followed by the system of meaning of words used in the paper. / Part three is the main section. There are 210 annotations in Shuo wen jie zi zhu that have inspired us to acknowledge the Core Meaning. In this part of the paper, these annotations are compared with dictionary entries to analyze the Core Meaning of each word and graphs are drawn to show the relationship between the Core Meaning and the glosseme. / Part four is the interpretation of Core Meaning Theory, which is based on the research of part three. The nature and the variation in Core Meaning are discussed, and the method of locating the Core Meaning is generalized. In addition, it illustrates how the Core Meaning affects the Extension of Meaning, and the usefulness of the Core Meaning is reiterated. / Part five is the summary and the prospect. It is concluded that Shuo wen jie zi zhu is essential in inspiring us to locate the Core Meaning. It is hope that this paper can enrich the achievement of the book and result in more researches into this field in the coming future. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / 盧冠忠. / Thesis (M.Phil.) Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2015. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 242-265). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / Lu Guanzhong.

本論文係以清代載有陰律之善書中最為流行的《玉歷寶鈔》為中心，以其所載陰律（簡稱「陰律」）分別與儒、釋、道三教之行為規範（簡稱「三教規範」）、宋代以後的中國傳統法律（簡稱「國法」）相比較，找出陰律與三教規範、國法兩者之關係，並對陰律加以分類，藉此瞭解陰律此一「活法」，增進對中國傳統法文化之認識。 陰律可粗分為：人―宗教關係類、人―非人眾生關係類、人―人關係類，其與三教規範間之關係主要為相類似、相親近、相衝突，其與國法間之關係則為：相親近、相衝突、相補充。基於研究所得，陰律是一套三教混雜、聖俗不分、橫跨三界、古今皆存、抽象具體並立的行為規範，其與三教規範、國法共同組成了一張各主不同階層或團體的法網。