Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:23:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 446164.pdf: 948462 bytes, checksum: e5d9458a3f221880fcc25c24d2a2db2a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-01-08 / The text Education, ethics and dialogue since Levinas and Gadamer, presented as a doctoral thesis in the Postgraduate Program in Education from PUC-RS, intends to investigate the relations between education and dialogue, in order to achieve the concept of education understood here as inseparable from its ethical condition. Admitting the inexistence of any universal grounding which support education, as well as any predetermined goals that guide educative action, this text takes the theoretical direction in favor of an ethical discursivity as a way to legitimate educational discourse. Furthermore, this theoretical course has a clear option in the conceptions of dialogue brought up by two philosophers: Emmanuel Levinas and Hans-Georg Gadamer. Therefore, in the text there is an elaboration of theoretical bases which enable us to understand the educational phenomenon, assuming the dialogue as the first movement of its occurrence. Once this introduction is made, it should be said that this paper develops around the following question: considering the impossibility of universal groundings for education and the resulting requirement to constructing legitimacy through discursivity, what implications can the dialogue conceptions presented in the philosophical theories of Levinas and Gadamer bring to the understanding of educational phenomenon? In order to answer this question rightly, observing the prior conjectures already mentioned, the text is organized around four important concepts which are articulately investigated together: sensibility, subjectivity, language and education. Each chapter is organized regarding one of these four concepts.Through these chapters is possible to observe a progressive elaboration of the final thesis, which is presented in two articulate stages: firstly as a conceptual dialogue between Levinas and Gadamer, who never had such oncoming in life; from this approach between both authors, derives the idea of dialogue that justifies the concept of education presented in the text. The concept of sensibility provides the title to the chapter that explores it in a direct articulation with the aesthetic experience, reaching one of the richest ideas of this study: openness, term often used by Gadamer and rather close to the Levinasian idea of welcome. The concept of subjectivity is explored in the second chapter, from the limits of modern philosophy of consciousness, to the openness to intersubjectivity as the condition so that it is possible to talk about a conception of subject. After the initial approach about sensibility and the attitude taken towards subjectivity based on intersubjectivity, a condition of originality that the dialogue takes in human relations starts to be justified. The third chapter aims to explain the concept of language, articulating authors referring to the philosophical movement of the linguistic turn up to the proposal of an ethical character of language: the dialogue as inaugural of ethics and, consequently, as first movement in education. The final chapter dedicates to summarize these four concepts in favor of what is formulated in the research question as comprehension of educational phenomenon . Thus, the text culminates presenting a conception of education which arises from the openness to the other revealed in the dialogue, and which has its occurrence marked by the possibility of the subject to constitute itself in the educative relation established.Read in a transversal way, the text enables us to perceive that: a) at the beginning of each chapter the debate context about the concept under discussion is presented, indicating the problems concerning education; b) at the second and third part of each chapter the aforementioned concepts from Levinas and Gadamer works are explored, respectively; c) at the fourth part of each chapter the first stage of the thesis elaboration takes place, which is the construction of a dialogue between the two authors referred; d) and, finally, at the last stage of each chapter, the concepts are applied to the reflection about the educational phenomenon until it culminates in the final thesis of this work. This whole work is presented as a theoretical study about the issue, built from a conceptual philosophic referential which was understood and applied so as to justify a comprehension about education. It is not an elaboration of a pedagogical proposal to be implanted. Instead, this work intends to be a philosophical description of a human phenomenon: the education. As such, the thesis does not point out for actions to be made, but describes and analyzes conceptually which movements can be recognized as educative action. The educational phenomenon can be understood, through this study, as a human event that: a) starts to manifest itself from an encounter between subjects who set up, in openness, into a conversation; and b) creates conditions so that each subject is able to elaborate their life experiences so as to provide a human sophistication from sensibility to rationality / O texto Educa??o, ?tica e di?logo desde Levinas e Gadamer, apresentado como tese doutoral junto ao Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o da PUC-RS, prop?e-se a investigar as rela??es entre educa??o e di?logo, a fim de perscrutar uma concep??o de educa??o aqui concebida como insepar?vel de sua condi??o ?tica. Admitindo a inexist?ncia de quaisquer fundamentos universais que sustentem a educa??o, e quaisquer finalidades predeterminadas que orientem a a??o educativa, o texto toma a dire??o te?rica em favor de uma discursividade ?tica como via de legitimidade do discurso educacional. E este percurso te?rico tem uma op??o clara nas concep??es de di?logo trazidas por dois fil?sofos: Emmanuel Levinas e Hans-Georg Gadamer. Portanto, ao longo do texto encontra-se a elabora??o de bases te?ricas que possibilitem a compreens?o do fen?meno educacional, assumindo o di?logo como movimento primeiro de seu acontecimento. Feitas essas considera??es, cabe dizer que o presente trabalho orienta-se em torno da seguinte quest?o: considerando-se a impossibilidade de fundamentos universais para a educa??o e a consequente exig?ncia de constru??o de legitimidade via discursividade, que implica??es as concep??es de di?logo apresentadas nas teorias filos?ficas de Levinas e Gadamer podem trazer para a compreens?o do fen?meno educacional? A fim de responder adequadamente ? quest?o apontada, observando os pressupostos j? referidos, o texto organiza-se em torno de quatro grandes conceitos que s?o explorados articuladamente entre si: sensibilidade, subjetividade, linguagem e educa??o. Em torno de cada um destes quatro conceitos ? organizado um dos cap?tulos da tese.Ao longo destes cap?tulos observa-se uma elabora??o gradual da tese final, que se apresenta em duas etapas articuladas: primeiramente como di?logo conceitual entre Levinas e Gadamer, dois autores que em vida n?o tiveram tal aproxima??o; desta aproxima??o entre os autores, deriva a concep??o de di?logo que justificar? a concep??o de educa??o apresentada ao longo do texto. O conceito de sensibilidade d? t?tulo ao cap?tulo que o explora em articula??o direta com a experi?ncia est?tica e chega at? uma das ideias mais caras a este estudo: a abertura, termo recorrentemente utilizado por Gadamer e bastante pr?ximo da ideia levinasiana de acolhida. O conceito de subjetividade ? explorado no segundo cap?tulo desde os limites da filosofia moderna da consci?ncia, at? a abertura ? intersubjetividade como condi??o para que se possa ainda tratar de uma concep??o de sujeito. Com a abordagem inicial sobre a sensibilidade e o posicionamento dado ? subjetividade a partir da intersubjetividade, come?a-se a justificar uma condi??o de originalidade que o di?logo toma nas rela??es humanas. O terceiro cap?tulo explora o conceito de linguagem, articulando os autores de refer?ncia ao movimento filos?fico do giro lingu?stico at? a proposi??o de um car?ter ?tico da linguagem: o di?logo como inaugural da ?tica e, por conseguinte, como movimento primeiro na educa??o. O cap?tulo final dedica-se a fazer a s?ntese dos conceitos j? abordados em favor do que ? tratado na quest?o de pesquisa como compreens?o do fen?meno educacional. Deste modo, o texto culmina apresentando uma concep??o de educa??o que se origina da abertura a outrem manifesta no di?logo, e que tem seu acontecimento marcado pela possibilidade que d? ao sujeito de formar-se na rela??o educativa estabelecida.Se lido de modo transversal, o texto permitir? perceber que: a) ao in?cio de cada cap?tulo ? apresentado um contexto de debate sobre o conceito em voga, apontando a problem?tica atinente ? educa??o; b) na segunda e terceira partes de cada cap?tulo exploram-se os conceitos mencionados a partir das obras de Levinas e de Gadamer, respectivamente; c) na quarta parte de cada cap?tulo d?-se a primeira etapa de formula??o de tese, que ? a constru??o de di?logo entre os dois autores de refer?ncia; d) e, por fim, na ?ltima etapa de cada cap?tulo, os conceitos s?o aplicados ? reflex?o sobre o fen?meno educacional at? culminar com a tese final do trabalho. Todo o trabalho apresenta-se como um estudo te?rico sobre o tema, constru?do a partir de um referencial conceitual filos?fico que foi interpretado e aplicado de modo a justificar uma compreens?o sobre a educa??o. N?o se trata da elabora??o de uma proposta pedag?gica a ser implantada. Antes disso, o trabalho prop?e-se a ser uma descri??o filos?fica sobre um fen?meno humano: a educa??o. Como tal, a tese n?o aponta a??es a serem praticadas, mas descreve e analisa conceitualmente quais movimentos podem ser reconhecidos como a??o educativa. O que se compreende por fen?meno educacional, a partir deste estudo, ? um acontecimento humano que: a) principia a manifestar-se a partir de um encontro entre sujeitos que se p?e, em abertura, numa conversa??o; e b) promove condi??es para que cada sujeito seja capaz de elaborar as experi?ncias vividas de modo a, assim, proporcionar um refinamento humano desde a sensibilidade at? a racionalidade.

Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-12-23T16:30:11Z No. of bitstreams: 1 476891 - Texto Completo.pdf: 1190322 bytes, checksum: 2698e7af12a0431321433a4ef34d8dbc (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-12-23T16:30:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 476891 - Texto Completo.pdf: 1190322 bytes, checksum: 2698e7af12a0431321433a4ef34d8dbc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-16 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / In this thesis we argue that the development of an ethics is present in the whole hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer. We came to this conclusion following Gadamer?s interpretation of the practical philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. We also achieved this idea through the recognition of the similarity between the proposal of a hermeneutical understanding and moral phenomena considered since the Socratic question about the good. In this sense, the conceptual framework that connects Gadamer?s philosophy and an ethics of dialogue is grounded in both the hermeneutical tradition and in his reinterpretation of the concept of Aristotelic phronesis and the Platonic dialogue. In our view, one of the most important contribution of the ?hermeneutical ethics of dialogue? was to seek a new basis for the discussion on ethical behavior. This is a concept of dialogue that identifies in the project of a human solidarity the possibility for the emergence of actions aimed at taking care of the other seeking the public well-being. Therefore, Gadamer?s hermeneutics reaffirms the importance of philosophy to evaluate the fundamental issues of our practical reality and allowing a rich debate of philosophy and other sciences (medicine, law, education). / Defendemos neste trabalho que a elabora??o de uma ?tica est? presente em toda a hermen?utica de Hans-Georg Gadamer. Chegamos a essa tese por meio da interpreta??o que Gadamer faz da filosofia pr?tica de Plat?o e Arist?teles e do reconhecimento da semelhan?a entre a proposta de uma compreens?o hermen?utica e os fen?menos morais considerados desde a pergunta socr?tica sobre o bem. Nesse sentido, a base conceitual que une a filosofia de Gadamer a uma ?tica do di?logo se encontra tanto na tradi??o hermen?utica como na sua releitura do conceito de phr?nesis aristot?lico e da ideia de di?logo plat?nica. Contudo, uma das maiores contribui??es do que chamamos de ??tica hermen?utica do di?logo? foi buscar uma base nova para a reflex?o dos modos de comportamento ?ticos. Trata-se de uma concep??o de di?logo, que identifica no projeto de uma solidariedade humana a possibilidade do surgimento de discursos e a??es voltados para o cuidado com o outro e, assim, para uma participa??o na vida em comunidade em prol de um bem comum. Desse modo, a hermen?utica de Gadamer termina reafirmando a relev?ncia da reflex?o filos?fica para quest?es fundamentais da nossa realidade pr?tica, o que leva a um debate prof?cuo entre a filosofia e outras ci?ncias (medicina, direito, educa??o).

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:38:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 422618.pdf: 941923 bytes, checksum: 4221e458fa48d35f57b3e366d16ada99 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-01-26 / Esse trabalho visa descrever e verificar processos inferenciais dial?gicos sem?nticos e pragm?ticos presentes no g?nero televisivo Reality Show, mais especificamente no Big Brother Brasil 9, produzido pela Rede Globo de Televis?o. Para tanto, firma-se nos estudos inferenciais de Grice (1975), Sperber e Wilson (1986/1995/2008), Levinson (2000) e Costa (2008/2009), mais especificamente nos processos inferenciais descritos, explicados e ilustrados pelos autores. Baseado na transcri??o n?o t?cnica de infer?ncias ling??sticas retiradas do Big Brother Brasil 9 ? poss?vel afirmar que as mesmas atuam no processo cognitivo de tomada de decis?o e demonstrar como isso ocorre.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:38:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 437781.pdf: 1798922 bytes, checksum: e11df3c39ec5233d56cec6b3c9249913 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-12-20 / This study?s main objective is to analyze the self/other relation on the interaction between a child with disabilities and family members (mother and sister) and investigate (i) helping or not the potential child's language in interaction scenes with family members, as well as (ii) discursive subject images of the child constructed by family members discourse. The relation between children speech and his family members speech was taken into consideration based on the dialogical theory assumptions from Bakhtin Circle, complemented by considerations of the disabled person history and the speech therapy containing specific clinical features of early childhood. The analyzed material was collected during the period of four months and includes monthly recorded shootings of interactions between a child and the responsible relative (mother and sister) occurred in a toy room at CADEP (health unit from Funda??o de Articula??o e Desenvolvimento de Pol?ticas P?blicas para Pessoas Portadoras de Defici?ncia e Pessoas Portadoras de Altas Habilidades no Rio Grande do Sul - FADERS). The research used a qualitative methodology for the analysis of three selected meetings, which was organized into two stages: scenes in which the adult speech over the child is observed and scenes in which there are interactions in which the familiar speech is addressed to the child. In each of the two moments, the research was supported by two main instances of analysis: interplay of voices in the discourse and responsiveness of the utterance. The study of the self/other relation in the dialogues between the family and the child provided an opportunity to investigate how social representations of disabled people, reflected and refracted in the speech of adults, appear in the clinical language manifestation of the selected child. As a result, it was observed that there was an interaction of voices in the family discourse whose evaluative tones are ranging from child speech abnormality to singularity, while the treated child fights to ensure his discursive place. It was also verified that the image of the receiver child is constructed in response to different points of view over the disabled person. These findings confirm the plural composition of the object of study, taken from a perspective that values the singular character of language in use. / O presente estudo objetivou analisar a rela??o eu/outro na intera??o entre uma crian?a com defici?ncia (S?ndrome de Down) e familiares (m?e e irm?), investigando (i) o favorecimento ou n?o das potencialidades de linguagem da crian?a em cenas de intera??o com familiares, bem como (ii) imagens de sujeito discursivo constru?das sobre a crian?a pelo discurso de familiares. A pesquisa considerou as rela??es entre o discurso infantil e o de membros de sua fam?lia a partir dos pressupostos da teoria dial?gica do C?rculo de Bakhtin, complementada pelas considera??es da hist?ria da pessoa com defici?ncia e da fonoaudiologia com as especificidades cl?nicas da primeira inf?ncia. A coleta do material de an?lise ocorreu durante quatro meses, com filmagens mensais da intera??o da crian?a com um de seus respons?veis (m?e e irm?), em uma sala de brinquedos do CADEP, unidade de sa?de da Funda??o de Articula??o e Desenvolvimento de Pol?ticas P?blicas para Pessoas Portadoras de Defici?ncia e Pessoas Portadoras de Altas Habilidades no Rio Grande do Sul (FADERS). Foi utilizada uma metodologia qualitativa para as an?lises dos tr?s encontros selecionados, cuja organiza??o foi dividida em dois momentos: as cenas em que ? observado o discurso do adulto sobre a crian?a e as intera??es em que o discurso familiar ? dirigido ? crian?a. Em cada um dos dois momentos, a investiga??o valeu-se de duas principais inst?ncias de an?lise: intera??o de vozes no discurso e responsividade do enunciado. O estudo da rela??o eu/outro nos di?logos entre a fam?lia e a crian?a oportunizou subs?dios para investigar como as representa??es sociais da pessoa com defici?ncia refletidas e refratadas no discurso do adulto aparecem na manifesta??o cl?nica de linguagem da crian?a selecionada. A partir das an?lises, constatou-se uma intera??o de vozes no discurso familiar cujo tom valorativo oscila entre a concep??o de anormalidade e a singularidade do discurso do sujeito em tratamento, que luta para sustentar o seu lugar discursivo. Verificou-se tamb?m que a imagem do destinat?rio infantil ? constru?da em resposta aos diferentes pontos de vista sobre a pessoa com defici?ncia. Tais constata??es reiteram a composi??o plural do objeto de estudo, tomado em uma perspectiva que valoriza o car?ter singular da linguagem em uso.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:35:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AlmiraN.pdf: 374864 bytes, checksum: 651e5d35db36dcc0f9139e835a581cb5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-07-25 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / The present work highlights the importance of Dialogue in dealing with situations of crisis, and human conflicts. It has a starting point in some ideas of David Bohm, and in so doing, it presents itself with the challenge of testing the premise that dialogical strategies, of thought and action, can make the human choices inherent to those situations, more coherent and creative. They also allow us to elucidate and grasp them, towards broader comprehension and resolution, while keeping the framework of consistent assessment. However, we believe that said strategies are not, necessarily, problem solvers. With that in mind, we expanded the notion of Dialogue , systematizing dialogical visions of the world, derived from the ideas of David Bohm, Paulo Freire and Mikhail Bakhtin, in which they give priority to the Dialogue component, in all human relations within crucial contexts. From the elaboration of that systemic and dialogical interface, in which Dialogue appears as common theme, and pervasive tool, we detected the emerging of ancillary themes such as Liberty , Consciousness , Creativity , Ethics and Responsibility . We see these themes as ways of comprehending Life, as each one embodies interests, needs and shared human motivations. We have articulated them as a network, and added to that the need of Reflection in conjunction with Dialogue as a watchful call for noticing the incoherence / Este trabalho destaca a import?ncia do di?logo no enfrentamento de situa??es de crise e conflitos humanos, tomando como fundamento algumas id?ias de David Bohm. Nesse intento, a aposta ? a de que estrat?gias dial?gicas de pensamento e a??o podem tornar as escolhas, em tais situa??es, mais coerentes e criativas, permitindo elucid?-las e desvel?-las para que possam ser compreendidas e enfrentadas de forma mais alargada, num processo de reflex?o permanente. Todavia, acreditamos que tais estrat?gias n?o s?o, necessariamente, solucionadoras de problemas. Para isso, ampliamos a no??o de di?logo, sistematizando-o em cosmovis?es dial?gicas a partir das id?ias de David Bohm, Paulo Freire e Mikhail Bakhtin, naquilo em que principalizam o di?logo nas rela??es humanas em contextos de crise. A partir da composi??o dessa interface dial?gica, na qual o di?logo se configura como tema comum e como ferramenta, observamos a emerg?ncia de temas como liberdade, consci?ncia, criatividade, ?tica e responsabilidade que denominamos grandes temas humanos e os entendemos como maneiras de compreens?o da vida por conterem interesses, necessidades e motiva??es humanas compartilhadas. Articulamos esses temas em rede e acrescentamos a necessidade da reflex?o junto ao di?logo, no sentido de alertar para a incoer?ncia

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:36:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AlineCB.pdf: 659199 bytes, checksum: 89a2e14cc7f935b9ddc7d45fd5af813a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-08-11 / In preparation for reviewing and reflect about the pedagogical practice of teaching supervisor, noting instances of continuing education in service, dialogue-based, reflective and shared as propelling in the construction of theoretical and practical knowledge is that we propose to undertake this research. Based in our professional practice and stimulated by the desire to contribute with the education in the city of Jardim de Piranhas-RN our intention was to highlight issues which arising from practice teaching, especially those guided in the principles of a continuing, dialogic and reflexive teachers training. In that sense we are encouraged to answer the following question. How has been developed the work of teaching supervisor in the city of Jardim de Piranhas and what kind of elements should be constituted by a continuing education in school if those elements are enhanced by a reflexive action and dialogue-based? Thus, we performed studies of theoretical foundation based in N?voa (1995, 2001, 2003), where he emphasizes the importance of take in account the practice itself as a source for the study in the construction of a new teaching practice process, in Alarc?o (1999; 2001; 2002; 2003), Sch?n (1995, 2000), Tardif (2003) and Perrenoud (2002), Gomes (1998), Navarro (2005) and Oliveira (2006), among others, provided the basis to discuss the role of reflection and dialogue in the school and classroom. We still emphasize the ideas of Paulo Freire (1981; 1992; 1996; 2001; 2002), which is consistent with the proposal for a reflexive action and training. For this we adopted a methodology based in the qualitative research with field note, intending to observe the strategies which emerge in the educational supervisor practice. This practice should contribute to the training of teachers. In this process we chose three dimensions that provide structure and power in their work. So, we can describe as conceptual, strategic and changeable / Na perspectiva de analisar e refletir sobre a pr?tica pedag?gica do supervisor a partir do trabalho que desenvolvem nas escolas municipais de Jardim de Piranhas-RN ? que nos propomos a realizar esta pesquisa. Partimos da nossa pr?tica profissional e do anseio em contribuir com a educa??o do Munic?pio de Jardim de Piranhas-RN, no sentido de real?ar aspectos advindos da pr?tica pedag?gica, principalmente aqueles pautados nos princ?pios de uma forma??o de educadores, continuada e em servi?o, dial?gica e reflexiva. Nesse sentido, somos instigados a responder a seguinte quest?o: como tem se desenvolvido o trabalho do supervisor pedag?gico na cidade de Jardim de Piranhas/RN, e que elementos, se potencializados por uma a??o reflexiva e dialogada, podem ser constitutivos de uma forma??o continuada na escola? Para tanto, realizamos estudos de fundamenta??o te?rica com base em N?voa (1995; 2001; 2003), quando enfatiza a import?ncia de se considerar a pr?pria pr?tica como fonte de estudo para a constru??o de uma nova pr?tica docente; em Alarc?o (1999; 200; 2002; 2003), Sch?n (1995; 2000), Tardif (2003) e Perrenoud (2002), Gomes (1998), Navarro (2005) e Oliveira (2006), entre outros, que fornecem as bases para a discuss?o sobre o papel da reflex?o e do di?logo na escola e na sala de aula. Enfatizamos, ainda, as id?ias do educador Paulo Freire (1981; 1992; 1996; 2001; 2002), que consideramos coerentes com a proposta de a??o e forma??o reflexiva. Metodologicamente, optamos por uma pesquisa qualitativa e de campo, com a inten??o de observar as estrat?gias emergentes na pr?tica pedag?gica do supervisor que possam contribuir para a forma??o dos professores. Elencamos 03 dimens?es como estruturantes e potencializadoras do trabalho do supervisor pedag?gico: a conceptual, a estrat?gica e a transformadora

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:36:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RosemeriS_TESE.pdf: 3277969 bytes, checksum: 0a0bceaa42d1e5fbf47379715fbad3cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-06-20 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / This thesis aims to investigate the Agronomy course in the perspective of the graduation course for the settlers of the Universidade Federal do Par?- Marab?. This course requires a partnership with the social movements of the North region of the country, with the purpose to understand knowledge production and how learning process occurs from the point of interaction and reliable relationships which are established in the organization during the course. The base of theses studies is to reflect of how the dialogue and learning processes occurred during the Agronomy course and resulted in changing in the teachers behavior and in the other integrated members of the group and mainly in the graduating settlers students. These changings happens as a consenquence of the dialogue production between the most varied areas, different people and institutions which take collective decisions. I observe educational actions, researches, extention concepts of extension and also development researches presented in the educative actions discussed by Freire (1985), Sim?es (2001, 2003) e de Amartya Sen (2000). The theory in which I am basing these studies are based in Boaventura de Souza Santos Sim?es (2001, 2003) and Amartya Sen (2000). Methodologically I analyse knowledge production by sudying the thesis and scientific works related to rural education, social movements, university and higher education in the last 20 years. I analyze the scientific works of all settler students, and besides, I do open interviews with the students, as well as, with the teachers and the leaders of social movements (MST, FETAGRI, CPT, EFA/FATA). I organize and analyze all the speeches from the ecological knowledge as defined by Boaventura de Souza Santos (2006). Finally, I visit five towns of municipal districts of the southeast of Par?, which represents the final methodological part of the research, in order to verify in loco the practices of the experiments purposed as final activity of the Agronomy course. I organize the work in five areas composed by the occupational process and the initiatives which emerged from them; development model and the social and environmental consequences; I also organize the university role and the relationship established between people and institutions which gave origin to the Agronomy course of UFPA and the programs developed in the region; conjuncture of creation of the groups of settled students, curriculum, principles and focus on the course and the experienced actions; developed practices in the course and the relations of reliability experienced internally and externally to the Academy, the learning and dialogue promoted by the course. I believe that the dialogue has caused changes in the organization of the knowledge and in the educative practices of the teachers, as well as, in the socio-productive practices of the regressed settled students / Esta tese investiga o Curso de Agronomia na forma??o de assentados da Universidade Federal do Par?-Campus Marab?, por demanda e parceria com movimentos sociais da Regi?o Norte do pa?s, com o prop?sito de compreender as aprendizagens (produ??o do conhecimento) a partir de trocas e rela??o de confiabilidade no outro, constru?das na organiza??o e realizadas do Curso. O pressuposto que orienta este estudo ? que os di?logos e aprendizagens ocorridas no curso de Agronomia provocaram mudan?as nos professores, nos integrantes dos movimentos e, principalmente, nos assentados egressos. Tais mudan?as acontecem pela promo??o do di?logo entre conhecimentos, ?reas, pessoas e institui??es nas tomada de decis?es e no desenvolvimento das a??es coletivas. Observo as concep??es de educa??o, de pesquisa, de extens?o e de desenvolvimento presente nos discursos e nas pr?ticas que orientam as a??es relativas ? educa??o discutidas por Freire (1985), Sim?es (2001, 2003) e de Amartya Sen (2000) e assumo como referencial te?rico b?sico as id?ias de Boaventura de Souza Santos (1985; 1989; 2000; 2004; 2005; 2006; 2008), Paulo Freire (1975; 1981; 1985; 1997; 1996) e Miguel Altiere (1989). Metodologicamente analiso a produ??o do conhecimento atrav?s das teses e disserta??es relativas a Educa??o do Campo, Movimentos Sociais, Universidade e Educa??o Superior, nos ?ltimos 20 anos. Analiso as monografias de conclus?o de curso de todos os educandos assentados, al?m de realizar entrevistas abertas com cada um/a. Utilizo a entrevista aberta, tamb?m, com os docentes do curso e com os dirigentes dos de movimentos sociais (MST, FETAGRI, CPT, EFA/FATA). Organizo e analiso os discursos a partir da id?ia de ecologia de saberes como definido por Boaventura de Souza Santos (2006). Finalmente, realizo visitas em cinco munic?pios da mesorregi?o Sudeste do Par?, recorte metodol?gico final da pesquisa, para verifica??o in locu da execu??o dos experimentos propostos como atividade final do Curso de Agronomia. Organizo o trabalho em cinco eixos composto pelo processo de ocupa??o e as iniciativas que dele emergiram; modelo de desenvolvimento e as conseq??ncias sociais e ambientais; cria??o e papel da Universidade e as rela??es estabelecidas entre pessoas e institui??es que deram origem ao Curso de Agronomia na UFPA e aos programas desenvolvidos na regi?o; conjuntura de cria??o da turma de educandos assentados, proposta curricular, princ?pios e foco do curso e as a??es vivenciadas; as pr?ticas desenvolvidas no curso e as rela??es de confiabilidade vivenciadas interna e externamente a academia, os aprendizados e os di?logos promovidos pelo curso. Considero que o di?logo provocou mudan?as na organiza??o do conhecimento e nas pr?ticas educativas dos professores, bem como nas pr?ticas s?cioprodutivas dos educandos egressos e dos assentados

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:36:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 HostinaMFN_TESE.pdf: 4361213 bytes, checksum: 2ec46114060037a78b770bd3855857cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-08-15 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / Considering the dialogue as a gnosiological act and teachers as a researchers of their own practice, this thesis deals with the contribution of Paulo Freire thoughts to teacher s formation process. The study was made over an intervention carried out at a regular Pedagogy Course, however directed to teachers on duty inside a program called PROFOMA??O (Special program for professional formation on Basic Education) promoted by Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN). From Freire s ideas of problematizing education, action and reflection dialectics, conscientization and from the analysis of the course itself, I support the idea that the dynamics of collective construction of knowledge- three pedagogical moments (ANGOTTI, DELIZOICOV e PERNAMBUCO) when intermediated by individual reflection, provided by written register, permits the development of three important dimensions of knowledge about pedagogical practice; observation and selfobservation; understanding the theories witch grounds the action; and theorization. By these means, initial and permanent teacher s formation could materialize its political commitment in a concrete action of collective and participative act of conscientization and transformation of the reality of pedagogical practice at school ground, developing itself as a truly circle of action and reflection / Considerando o di?logo como um ato gnosiol?gico e o professor como um pesquisador de sua pr?tica, esta tese aborda a contribui??o do pensamento de Paulo Freire para a forma??o de professores, analisando uma interven??o realizada no Curso de Pedagogia voltado para a forma??o de professores em servi?o atrav?s do Programa Especial de Forma??o Profissional Para a Educa??o B?sica (PROFORMA??O) da Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN). A partir das ideias freireanas de educa??o problematizadora, a??o-reflex?o-a??o, conscientiza??o e da an?lise da interven??o, defendo que a din?mica de constru??o coletiva de conhecimentos - tr?s momentos pedag?gicos, conforme Jos? Andr? Angotti, Dem?trio Delizoicov e Marta Pernambuco - quando intermediada pela reflex?o individual proporcionada pelo registro escrito, permite o desenvolvimento de tr?s importantes dimens?es do conhecimento sobre a pr?tica pedag?gica: a observa??o e auto-observa??o; a compreens?o das teorias que fundamentam a a??o; e a teoriza??o. Assim, a forma??o inicial e permanente de professores pode materializar seu compromisso pol?tico numa a??o concreta, coletiva e participativa de conscientiza??o e transforma??o da realidade da pr?tica pedag?gica na escola, desenvolvendo-se como um verdadeiro c?rculo de a??o-reflex?o-a??o

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:36:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MariaASF_TESE.pdf: 2171639 bytes, checksum: b27f1bef4492211e598fbd7cdc5d1c28 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-08-19 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / This study focuses on a methodology of unchained action by Father Sabino Gentili in M?e Luiza, suburb of Natal-RN, which has enhanced social participation in what Castells calls project identity. The perception of collective actions, focused on the development of subjects from the perspective of Alain Touraine occurs continuously in a popular neighborhood, whose history marked by conflict mainly related to the resistance in the remaining living space. It is argued that there was an appropriation of resistance identity, which was already present in the community of M?e Luiza, in order to channel it to create a project identity, through an implicit methodology that has been identified as Pedagogy of Consensus, based on Paulo Freire s concepts of dialogue and participation. Therefore, by means of qualitative research, using tools such as semi-structured interviews and documented sources, we tried to describe the intent of the action of a social actor and the political and educational strategies that motivate the collective action aiming a social change, observing the elements present in this action that allowed the continuity of organizational and participating processes through the dynamics of M?e Luiza s neighborhood / Este trabalho debru?a-se sobre uma metodologia de a??o desencadeada por Pe. Sabino Gentili, entre 1980 e 2006, em M?e Luiza, bairro perif?rico da cidade de Natal-RN, que potencializou a participa??o social em torno do que Castells chama de identidade de projeto. H? a percep??o da exist?ncia de a??es coletivas, focadas na constitui??o de sujeitos na perspectiva de Alain Touraine que se d?o de modo cont?nuo em um bairro popular cuja hist?ria ? marcada por conflitos, relacionados, principalmente, ? resist?ncia pela perman?ncia no espa?o habitado. Defende-se que houve a apropria??o de uma identidade de resist?ncia, j? presente na comunidade de M?e Luiza, de modo a canaliz?-la para a constru??o de uma identidade de projeto, atrav?s de uma metodologia impl?cita que foi identificada como uma Pedagogia do Consenso, calcada nos conceitos de di?logo e de participa??o de Paulo Freire. Assim, por meio da pesquisa qualitativa, utilizando de instrumentos como entrevistas semiestruturadas e fontes documentais, buscou-se descrever a intencionalidade da a??o de um ator social, as estrat?gias pol?ticas e as pr?ticas educativas que perpassam a a??o coletiva com vistas ? mudan?a social, observando os elementos presentes nessa a??o que propiciaram a continuidade de processos organizativos e participativos em meio ? din?mica pr?pria do bairro de M?e Luiza

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:36:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LuziaFMO.pdf: 3049131 bytes, checksum: 1d484607433d84c17675cbd3fe7686cf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-11-24 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / This work detaches the importance of the continued formation of the educators in terms of the inclusive educational process, pointing as basic elements the continued formation of the educational professionals. In this direction, it points and it defends the dialogue in the perspective of David Bohm, with interfaces of the freireanas ideas, as a methodological resource of action that allows the organization of strategies of collective and effective pedagogical support in inclusive schools, in the same time articulates the continued formation of the professionals in education. Characterized as research in a dialogical action with collective participation and collaboration, it counted with the participation of 87 educators, between professors, pedagogical, managing coordinators and specialists of special education in two schools of the state and municipal public system of Natal/RN. The results had pointed with respect to the viability of the dialogue as articulated methodological tool of the continued formation in service, when providing the establishment of personal and professional relationship between the educators, favoring the discursive enjoyment of the lived experiences, allows the organization of strategies of collective and effective pedagogical support in the scholar environment. On the basis of these results, this work also points to some items to reflections as the reorganization of the Secretariats and the schools, in the direction to brighten up the fragmentation and the discontinuity of the pedagogical actions evidenced and to instigate a process of changes that has glimpsed the professional development of the educators through its continued formation in service and the improvement of the school in the way of the concretization of an education directed toward the acceptance, respect and attendance the diversity of its pupils, as detaches the official documents and the studies on the inclusive education / Este trabalho destaca a import?ncia da forma??o continuada dos educadores quanto ao processo educacional inclusivo, apontando como elementos b?sicos o apoio pedag?gico em uma a??o dial?gica com participa??o coletiva e colaborativa. Neste sentido, aponta e defende o di?logo na perspectiva de David Bohm, com interfaces das id?ias freireanas, como um recurso metodol?gico de a??o que permite a organiza??o de estrat?gias de apoio pedag?gico coletivo e efetivo em escolas inclusivas, ao mesmo tempo em que articula a forma??o continuada dos profissionais da educa??o. Caracterizada como uma pesquisa de a??o dial?gica, participante e colaborativa contou com a participa??o de 87 educadores, entre professores, coordenadores pedag?gicos, gestores e especialistas de educa??o especial em duas escolas da rede p?blica estadual e municipal da cidade do Natal/RN. Os resultados apontaram para a viabilidade do di?logo como uma ferramenta metodol?gica articuladora da forma??o continuada em servi?o, ao proporcionar o estabelecimento de v?nculos pessoais e profissionais entre os educadores, favorecendo a frui??o comunicativa das experi?ncias de a??es educacionais vivenciadas, oportunizando a forma??o de estrat?gias de apoio dentro do processo de forma??o constru?da e efetivada coletiva e colaborativamente no ambiente escolar. Com base nesses resultados, este trabalho aponta, ainda, alguns itens para reflex?es como a reestrutura??o organizativa das Secretarias e das escolas, no sentido de amenizar a fragmenta??o e a descontinuidade das a??es pedag?gicas constatadas e instigar um processo de mudan?as que vislumbre o desenvolvimento profissional dos educadores atrav?s de sua forma??o continuada em servi?o e a melhoria da escola no caminho da efetiva??o de uma educa??o voltada para a aceita??o, respeito e atendimento ? diversidade de seus alunos, como ressaltam os documentos oficiais e os estudos sobre a educa??o inclusiva