Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / This dissertation aims to investigate the moral theory of David Hume from his empirical method. In order that it is necessary to analyze his critique of rationalism and metaphysics as a method to moral foundation, the presentation of the empirical method as a possible theoretical foundation of morality and expose his moral theory in the context of his philosophical system. It is intended, therefore, to show that in Hume the reason by itself is insufficient to justify the moral, whose realization is possible only within the sensitivity. Similarly, the objective is to demonstrate that, although Hume s philosophy is skeptical concerning the metaphysical precepts and usual rationalist traditions, his understanding about morality is positive and intends to be universal. / A presente dissertação tem como objetivo investigar a teoria moral de David Hume a partir de seu método empírico. Para isso, é necessária a análise de sua crítica ao racionalismo e à metafísica como métodos para a fundamentação moral, a apresentação do método empírico como possibilidade de fundamentação teórica da moral e a exposição de sua teoria moral no contexto de seu sistema filosófico. Pretende-se, portanto, demonstrar por que em Hume a razão por si só é insuficiente para fundamentar a moral, cuja realização somente é possível no âmbito da sensibilidade. De forma semelhante, objetiva-se demonstrar que, embora se encontre em Hume uma filosofia cética em relação aos preceitos metafísicos e à tradição racionalista em geral, sua compreensão da moral é positiva e pretende-se universal

[pt] O objetivo geral deste trabalho é propor uma interpretação das teorias causal e dos valores (moral e estético) de David Hume, que designo por quasi-realismo cético. Neste sentido, procuro justificar um confronto das análises elaboradas na literatura secundário sobre o filósofo – que têm estado sistemática e declaradamente apartadas. Para cumprir este objetivo, começo por apresentar de forma introdutória algumas pressuposições importantes para este trabalho (capítulo 1). Depois, procuro destacar e desenvolver algumas componentes das teorias causal e dos valores (moral e estético) de Hume que são determinantes para a discussão, subdividindo-as em componentes que designo por metafísica, epistémica e semântica (capítulos 2 e 3). Por último, procuro justificar a posição que assumo em relação a cada um destes aspetos considerados, compondo, assim, o conjunto de componentes do designado quasi-realismo cético – essencialmente inspirado na contribuição de Angela Coventry (por sua vez, inspirada no quasirealismo de Simon Blackburn), ao mesmo tempo que lhe acrescenta um elemento cético (capítulo 4). / [en] The general aim of this work is to propose an interpretation of David Hume s theories of causality and values (moral and aesthetic), which I call sceptical quasi-realism. In this respect, I try to confront several analysis developed in secondary litterature about the philosopher – which have been sistematically and openly separated. To achieve this aim, I begin by introducing some presuppositions which are important for the purposes of this work (chapter 1). Then, I try to identify and develop some determinant features of Hume s theory of causality and values (moral and aesthetic) for the discussion, subdivided in features which I call metaphysic, epistemic and semantic (chapters 2 and 3). Finally, I attempt to justify the interpretation regarding each of this considered features, composing the set of features of what I call sceptical quasi-realism – mainly inspired in Angela Coventrys contributions (which, in turn, is inspired in Simon Blackburns quasi-realism), adding a sceptical element to it (chapter 4).

Résumé : À l’aube des études humiennes, Norman Kemp Smith appelait à représenter Hume « suivant toutes ses nombreuses activités », comme s’il pressentait que l’étude de la pensée humienne pouvait s’avérer un labyrinthe dans lesquels les commentaires pouvaient s’égarer et se perdre de vue. Ce pressentiment, on peut le dire aujourd’hui, s’est avéré juste, et il porte avec lui une clé de lecture : pour dépasser la représentation parcellaire, fragmentée et ultimement incohérente d’un Hume kaléidoscopique, le mieux est peut-être de s’intéresser à ses activités. La présente thèse vise à circonscrire la pratique humienne de la philosophie, ou, pourrait-on dire, du travail épistémologique et conceptuel, dans l’espace de son magnum opus, et cela à l’aide d’une clé de lecture : celle du réductionnisme. Si le Traité est une oeuvre que l’on peut qualifier d’empiriste, on ne saurait la lire seulement par ce biais ou par celui de questions localisées, et nous montrons que le projet du Traité ne peut se comprendre qu’en voyant comment Hume tente d’y réduire la et les connaissances à des dépendances ou à des parties de sa propre théorie de la nature humaine. Pour cela, nous procédons via quatre chapitres. D’abord, nous tentons de circonscrire les caractéristiques les plus importantes du projet humien, c’est-à-dire de ce que Hume avait l’intention de développer à travers les contenus particuliers du Traité ; ensuite, nous nous concentrons sur la base dont Hume part et dont il se servira pour accomplir des réductions, base que l’on peut appeler une théorie des perceptions doublée d’une théorie de l’esprit (principes, facultés, relations) ; ces deux théories, couplées à un standard strict pour obtenir le statut de « vraie idée » ou d’idée intelligible, semblent amener de par leurs prémisses assez directement au scepticisme, et c’est pourquoi on traitera du scepticisme avant d’évoquer les aspects « naturalistes » du Traité au-delà des éléments de base de la théorie des perceptions et de l’esprit, soit une manoeuvre qui ne suit pas tout à fait l’ordre humien d’exposition mais nous semble suivre un certain ordre des raisons ; enfin, la quatrième partie nous permettra de passer en revue diverses réductions opérées par Hume, celles qui mènent au scepticisme pyrrhonien mises à part, ce qui nous permettra de voir quelles sont les limites et les problèmes afférents à son réductionnisme particulier. Refondateur, systématique et totalisant dans ses intentions, le Traité suit bien plus qu’un projet simplement empiriste, et on verra que dans la démarche humienne l’empirisme apparaît davantage dans les conclusions qu’au point même de départ. En le lisant comme le lieu et la conséquence d’une orientation que l’on peut dire réductionniste, on peut trouver dans le Traité un fil conducteur qui, en dépit de problèmes plus ou moins importants rencontrés en cours de route, ne se rompt pas. / Abstract : At the dawn of Hume studies, Norman Kemp Smith called to study the philosopher “in all his manifold activities,” as if he foresaw there a serious risk for the comments to lose themselves as well as each other. Today, it can be said that Kemp Smith’s foreseeing was legitimate. Fortunately, it is possible to find here a reading key: in order to go beyond fragmented and ultimately incoherent readings of Hume, the better way to proceed may consist into focusing on his activities. The present dissertation aims at delineating Hume’s practice of philosophy, or rather his conceptual and epistemological work, in his magnum opus, by focusing on why, how and when he makes reductions. As well-known, the Treatise is an empiricist work, but can never be fully understood if one focuses only on that aspect or on local and tangential questions, and we aim at showing that the Hume’s project and development of said project can only be understood by following how the philosopher tries to reduce most (if not all) knowledge to dependencies of his own theory of human nature. In order to do that, we proceed through four chapters. First, we circumscribe the most important features of the project before and behind the Treatise, which is, what Hume intended to develop through the particular contents of the work. Second, we focus on the conceptual basis from where Hume accomplishes reductions, a basis we call his theory of perceptions, on which is grafted a theory of mind (principles, faculties, relations). These theories, associated to an intention to boil down everything into perceptions as well as to a strict standard to give a mental content the status of a “true idea,” seem to lead straight to skepticism, and this is why the third chapter will focus on the skeptical overtones of the Treatise before looking into aspects commonly referred to as “naturalist.” Though this maneuver does not exactly follow Hume’s own order of exposition, it follows, we think, a specific order of reasons. Finally, on the fourth chapter we review various reductions Hume proceeds (apart from those that lead to a Pyrrhonian skepticism), which will allow us to highlight the limits and problems that stem from his particular breed of reductionism. Following a foundationalist, systematic and totalizing project, Hume’s Treatise is much more than simply empiricist, and as we will see the empiricist aspect appears more as a set of conclusions than as a starting point. Read as both a place and an effect of a reductionist orientation, the Treatise shows a common threat which, in spite of sometimes important problems met on the spot, never breaks.

The 'prevalence of the calm passions over the violent' is Hume's general formula for both virtue and happiness. I argue in this dissertation that Hume's detailed account of the causes and effects of the relative calmness and strength of motivating passions in Treatise 2.3 is a main goal of Hume's project in the Treatise, Books I and II, and the reason why he published them together in 1739 as a "compleat chain of reasoning by themselves." However, despite widespread recognition of the general importance of this doctrine to Hume's 'science of man', no adequate attempt has been made to investigate those sections of Treatise 2.3 which bear directly on a deeper understanding of the causes of this 'prevalence of the calm passions'. Such attention is particularly warranted because, as I argue, these sections of the Treatise constitute Hume's attempt at an 'anatomy' of deliberation which accounts for the principles of human nature by which we successfully regulate our conduct and remain constant in pursuit of our long-term greater good. However, these sections also give rise to interpretative challenges that threaten the coherence of this central doctrine. Accordingly, my aim in this dissertation is to analyze Hume's anatomy of deliberation and of the prevalence of calm passions in Treatise 2.3 and to work through the interpretative difficulties it poses. I present a novel resolution of these interpretative problems which calls attention to the importance both of Hume's Treatise, Book I account of causal belief and of his neglected account of the influence of the passions on the imagination and understanding for his theory of motivation. I demonstrate that it is only when we attend to these key features of Hume's account of human nature that we can appreciate the coherent Humean theory of prudential motivation that emerges from Treatise 2.3.

In A Treatise of Human Nature, David Hume argues that moral judgments are the product of sentiment. The mechanism of sympathy allows individuals to enter into a common point of view in order to produce judgments that are truly moral, and not merely self-interested. Hume argues that the common point of view is the standard that moral judgments are subjected to. I argue that the common point of view is an inadequate standard for distinguishing between proper and improper moral judgments. The common point of view is inadequate because it is subjective and unreflective. In The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith offers an account of moral judgment that has an adequate standard for distinguishing between proper and improper moral judgments. Smith avoids the problems with Hume’s account due to his distinction between partial and impartial spectators and the role that self-command plays in his theory of moral judgment.

Paul Russell argues that the interpretation of Hume as a classical compatibilist is misguided. Russell defends a naturalistic reading of Humean freedom and moral responsibility. On this account, Hume holds two theses: that moral responsibility is a product of our moral sentiments, and that our concept of moral freedom is derived from our considerations of moral responsibility. Russell claims that Hume’s theory of the passions is non-cognitivist, and thus that his account of moral judgment fails to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary actions or qualities of mind. He concludes that Hume’s account of moral responsibility is inadequate. I argue that Hume has a cognitivist account of the passions. For Hume, our character is judged to be a proper object of praise or censure on account of our ability to partake in a moral community with our fellows. I conclude that Hume does not naturalize freedom and moral responsibility, but socializes it.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Cambridge, 1991.

110f. / Submitted by Suelen Reis (suziy.ellen@gmail.com) on 2013-04-15T14:51:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Carlos Coelho Netoseg.pdf: 368379 bytes, checksum: 2c9ad4cfd6bb8d760c541ac931d2a6be (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Rodrigo Meirelles(rodrigomei@ufba.br) on 2013-04-18T13:20:11Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Carlos Coelho Netoseg.pdf: 368379 bytes, checksum: 2c9ad4cfd6bb8d760c541ac931d2a6be (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2013-04-18T13:20:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Carlos Coelho Netoseg.pdf: 368379 bytes, checksum: 2c9ad4cfd6bb8d760c541ac931d2a6be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / Esta Dissertação tem por objetivo analisar a noção de crença sob o ponto de vista da epistemologia contida nas obras: Tratado da Natureza Humana e Investigações Sobre o Entendimento Humano. Visamos particularmente a ressaltar a questão da constituição da crença enquanto condição para que haja alguma “evidência” na esfera dos fatos. Tendo em vista a ruptura entre necessidade e contingência por sua crítica à noção de causalidade, seria preciso mais que os fundamentos consolidados pela razão para garantir alguma evidência acerca do mundo. A razão consegue conceber claramente o fato contrário àquele revelado constantemente pela experiência, não havendo contradição na esfera da experiência. Dessa forma, é preciso procurar outros caminhos que possam explicar o fato de ainda termos alguma convicção a respeito dos fatos, apesar de não podermos mais contar com bases semelhantes às oferecidas pelas ciências matemáticas. Desse modo, procuramos nesta Dissertação reconstruir a trilha teórica que permitiu a Hume estabelecer uma epistemologia pautada numa particular constituição da experiência, na qual a necessidade não tem lugar e a garantia de certeza e conhecimento se sustenta em princípios gerais (princípios associativos) próprios da natureza humana e em uma faculdade (o hábito), capaz de levar a mente de um estado imediato, vinculado aos dados do sentido e da memória, a projeções futuras. Vem daí a capacidade da mente de esperar que os acontecimentos se dêem de uma maneira; tal expectativa é o que Hume denominou crença. / Salvador

Au sein de ce mémoire, nous analysons la contribution du théologien, scientifique et philosophe Joseph Priestley (1733-1804) aux débats des Lumières anglaises portant sur la question de la liberté humaine et sur le déterminisme. Nous procédons à l’exposition de l’ensemble des textes dans lesquels Priestley développe son nécessitarisme, notamment «The Doctrine of Philosophical Necessity Illustrated» (1777), et de ceux dans lesquels il répond aux critiques formulées par ses contemporains à l’égard de sa doctrine. Nous présentons et analysons les principaux arguments employés par Priestley pour inférer la vérité du nécessitarisme (et, du même coup, la fausseté de la doctrine du libre arbitre). Les arguments que nous identifions sont formulés à partir (1) de la considération des relations causales, (2) de la compréhension priestleyenne du fonctionnement de la volonté, (3) du matérialisme et (4) de la doctrine de la prescience divine. Nous expliquons qu’une compréhension adéquate du discours nécessitariste de Priestley requiert une compréhension de son effort d’importer, en philosophie morale, la méthodologie employée dans ses travaux de philosophie naturelle, et qui est fortement inspirée par les «regulae philosophandi» de Newton, dont il admire la fécondité. L’importance du rôle joué par l’associationnisme de David Hartley et par la théorie de la matière-force de Roger Boscovich dans l’élaboration du nécessitarisme priestleyen est aussi soulignée. Tout au long de notre étude, les particularités de la pensée de Priestley sont mises en évidence à l’aide de comparaisons faites principalement avec les écrits de David Hume, David Hartley, Richard Price et Thomas Reid.

The thesis argues that two ways in which we can consider empathy’s role in ethics are fundamentally flawed because they fail to take into account the myriad ways in which empathy can be affected and influenced by our motivations. I apply what I call ‘the motivation objection’ to these two views. This has three aspects: (1) reliability: because empathy can be affected and influenced by our motivations, empathizing does not always lead to the right results; (2) function: because it can be affected and influenced by our motivations, empathy is not sufficient for various functions; (3) circularity: because it can be affected and influenced by our motivations, empathy cannot be used to define or explain certain aspects of morality in a non-circular way. The two ways of considering empathy’s role in ethics are what I call constitutive views, according to which empathy in some way constitutes, or is the foundation for, morality, and instrumental views, according to which empathy is of instrumental value in morality. I apply the motivation objection to three constitutive views, two historical and one contemporary, each of which is a sentimentalist theory of morality with empathy (or sympathy, in the case of the historical theories) at its heart. These are the sentimentalist moral theories of David Hume, Adam Smith and Michael Slote. I then apply the motivation objection to instrumental views of empathy’s role in ethics, before defending one particular instrumental view, according to which empathy can play a positive role in morality when integrated with virtue, and the virtue of compassion in particular.