This thesis explores the legal implications of sanctions on third country companies trading or operating with a sanctioned target state. Considering previous research – primarily from the disciplines of international business, international commercial law and economics – into international business under conditions of sanctions, we analyze the interplay of different sanctions and how they affect third country business. Based on our findings, we propose a model for third country trade in relation to sanctions and sanctioned markets. We conclude that, depending on how they are applied and implemented, sanctions and countersanctions can have contradictory and counterintuitive effects. Under conditions of sanctions, third countries can shield international business from increased political risk and uncertainty, and offer access to otherwise unavailable resources and advantages in sanctioned markets. However, even as third-country companies may be beyond the reach of extraterritorial sanctions, they must still grapple with a number of other effects of sanctions regimes. Such effects include significantly increasing transaction costs due to legal uncertainty, disruptions to supply chains, and being possibly locked out of sanctioning-state markets given noncompliance with sanctions. Depending on target country countermeasures, sanctions regimes may contribute to creating a situation in which third country company activities in a sanctioned state are effectively subsidized at the cost of companies adhering to the regulations of sanctioning bodies. These findings raise important questions for future research into international trade and commercial law.

Since the 1970s and the first data protection laws, the flow of personal data across borders has always been a crucial issue. In this thesis, we study how we have moved from regulations advocating the protection of personal data outside borders to regulations establishing a principle of free data circulation on a global scale. This study is based firstly on a retrospective of personal data law with regard to transborder data flows, and secondly on the fact that these legal questions are now merged with issues of international trade law. Finally, we consider the drifts of such a free flow of data at the global level, and we reflect on certain avenues of reflection in order to place data protection as an end in itself, at the center of the issues. / Depuis les années 1970 et les premières législations relatives à la protection des données personnelles, la circulation des données personnelles hors des frontières a toujours été un enjeu crucial. Dans ce mémoire nous étudions comment l’on est passé de réglementations prônant la protection des données personnelles hors des frontières à des réglementations instaurant un principe de libre circulation des données à l’échelle mondiale. Cette étude se fonde dans un premier temps sur une rétrospective du droit des données personnelles en ce qui concerne les flux transfrontières de données avant de constater dans un second temps que ces questions de droit sont désormais fondues dans des enjeux de droit du commerce international. Posant enfin les dérives d’une telle libre circulation des données au niveau mondial, nous réfléchissons à certaines pistes de réflexion afin de replacer la protection des données comme une fin en soi, au centre des enjeux.

"Thèse présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures de l'Université de Montréal en vue de l'obtention du grade de Docteur en droit (LL.D.)" / Les organismes génétiquement modifiés (OGM) agricoles à vocation médicale constituent la catégorie la plus complexe, la plus innovatrice et la plus futuriste des biotechnologies agricoles. Pour cela, les OGM agricoles médicaux constituent l'échantillon parfait d'une recherche complète sur le principe de précaution et les perspectives normatives des applications médicales de cette innovation technologique. La contribution de cette recherche, à la prévention du risque biotechnologique potentiel associé au commerce international de tels produits agricoles, réside sur la proposition d'une approche d'harmonisation dite simultanée convergente des régimes juridiques applicables à la double vocation agricole et médicale de tels organismes. L'approche est simultanée en ce qu'elle n'exclue ni ne subordonne un instrument par un autre. Elle est convergente en ce que tous les cadres normatifs applicables convergent, dans leur complémentarité, vers la libéralisation du commerce international des OGM agricoles dans la prévention du potentiel risque biotechnologique. Pour articuler la proposition d'harmonisation, nous avons proposé un principe directeur qui est la primauté durable de la santé publique sur le commerce. Ce principe est en réalité la dimension environnementale et biosécuritaire du principe de primauté de la santé publique sur le commerce, promu conjointement par l'Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS) et le Secrétariat de l'Organisation mondiale du commerce (OMC). La recherche conçoit qu'un éventuel recours constructif aux OGM agricoles médicaux dans le développement des pays pauvres, devrait être assujetti à une mise en oeuvre simultanée convergente des régimes juridiques applicables. / Medical agricultural GMOs are the category of agricultural GMOs the most complex, the most innovative and the most futuristic. For these reasons, they are the best sample for a complete study on the precautionary principle as weil as on the perspectives of medical applications in agricultural biotechnology. The contribution of this research to biosafety consists of the proposition of a normative method of harmonization, based on a simultaneous convergent application of food, drugs and pharmaceutical relevant international agreements in international trade. The proposed approach is simultaneous because relevant agreements do not exclude each other or subordinate one to another. It is convergent because agreements complete each other in biosafety and international commerciallaw of agricultural GMOs. To conduct the harmonization, we have proposed as a main principle, the principle of sustainable primacy of public health on trade. This principle is the environmental and biosafety emphasis of the principle of primacy of public health on trade which is promoted joindy by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Secretariat. The research suggests that an eventual profitable use of medical agricultural GMOs in developing countries would be subject to a simultaneous convergent application of relevant international agreements on biosafety and international trade.

La fin de la guerre froide amorça une nouvelle ère de privatisation, de libéralisation et de dérégulation sans précédent. L’internet et les nombreuses autres avancées technologiques ont rapproché les citoyens du monde à un degré impressionnant. Le monde au XXIème siècle semble être plus interdépendant que jamais. De nombreuses problématiques contemporaines dépassent largement les contrôles et les frontières étatiques, des problématiques reliées par exemple aux investissements étrangers directs, aux droits de l’homme, à l’environnement, à la responsabilité sociale des entreprises, etc. La globalisation des marchés marque par ailleurs le recul de l’État face aux acteurs non étatiques. La société civile et les multinationales surgissent dès lors en tant que véritables partenaires dans l’ordre juridique international. Cela est illustré notamment par l’accès accordé aux multinationales/investisseurs à la justice internationale économique. Ces derniers ont la capacité de poursuivre un État qui violerait leurs droits marchands découlant d’un TBI devant une juridiction arbitrale internationale. Qu’en est-il par contre des droits non marchands violés par les investisseurs ? Cette étude explore les motifs militant pour un accès de la société civile à la justice internationale économique. Le but d’un tel accès serait d’opposer les droits non marchands, suscités par des problématiques inhérentes à la globalisation des marchés, à la fois à l’égard des États et à l’égard des multinationales, et auxquelles aucune réponse étatique unilatérale ou interétatique ne peut remédier adéquatement. / The end of the cold war marked an unprecedented new era of privatisation, liberalisation, and deregulation. Internet and the numerous technological advancements have brought citizens of this world closer at an astonishing degree. The world in the XXIst century seems more interdependent than ever before. A number of contemporary problematic issues significantly bypass State controls and borders. They are for instance related to foreign direct investment, human rights, the environment, corporate social responsibility, etc. Globalisation marks the State’s retreat in favour of non-state actors. In this light, civil society and multinationals appear as significant partners in the international legal order. This is in part reflected in the access given to multinationals/investors to international trade law justice. They have the capacity to file claims against states in front of international arbitration jurisdictions for violations of their trade rights as provided under BITs. However, what about the non-trade rights that may have been violated by investors? The present study explores the motives that would justify civil society’s access to international trade law justice. The purpose of such access would be to stand for non-trade rights, raised by problematic issues inherent to globalization, against States and multinationals, and that cannot be remedied solely through unilateral nor interstate efforts.

In the sea trade, the traditional paper-based bill of lading has played an important role across the globe for centuries, but with the advent of advanced commercial modes of transportation and communication, the central position of this document is under threat. The importance of the bill of lading still prevails as does the need of the functions that this document served in the past, although in a changed format. In the recent past, the world has witnessed a lot of debate about replacing this traditional paper-based document with an electronic equivalent that exhibits all of its functions and characteristics, both commercial and legal. More specifically, unlike many rival travel documents, such as the Sea Waybill, a bill of lading has two prominent features, that is to say, its negotiability and its acceptability as a document of title in certain legal jurisdictions that are required to be retained in an electronic bill of lading so as to also retain the prominence of this document in the future landscape. This thesis is, however, more concerned about the legal aspects of adopting the electronic bill of lading as a traditional paper-based legal document as well as an effective legal document in the present age. However, the scope of this debate remains primarily focused on the USA and UK jurisdictions. In the course of this thesis, it is observed that, in the past, the bill of lading has been subject to a variety of international regimes, such as The Hague Rules and The Hague-Visby Rules, and presently efforts are being made to arrive at a universal agreement under the umbrella of The Rotterdam Rules, but such an agreement is yet to arrive among the comity of nations. On the other hand, efforts made by the business community to introduce an electronic bill of lading are much louder and more evident. The private efforts, such as the SeaDocs System, CMI Rules, and the BOLERO Project, etc., were, however, received by the fellow business community with both applause as well as suspicion. At the same time, there are a number of concerns voiced by the international business community on the legislative adoptability in national and international jurisdictions and the courts’ approach in adjudicating cases involving electronic transactions and these are making the task of adoption of electronic bill of lading in the sea-based transactions a difficult task. Therefore, in the absence of any formal legal backing from national and international legislations, these attempts could not achieve the desired results. In this thesis, the present situation of the acceptability of electronic transactions in general, and of the electronic bill of lading specifically, has also been discussed with reference to certain national jurisdictions, such as Australia, India, South Korea and China, in order to present comparative perspectives on the preparedness of these nations. On the regional level, the efforts made by the European Union have also been discussed to promote electronic transactions within its jurisdiction. All the discussion, however, leads to the situation where the level of acceptability of electronic bill of lading in the near future is found to be dependent upon the official efforts from the national governments and putting these efforts towards arriving at an agreement on Rotterdam Rules as early as possible. The other area of importance revealed in this thesis is the need for change in juristic approach by the courts while interpreting and adjudicating upon cases involving electronic transactions. On the whole, this thesis has provided a cohesive and systematic review, synthesis and analysis of the history of the bill of lading, its importance as a document of title, and attempts to incorporate its important functions within the fast-paced electronic shipping commerce of today. In such a way it has provided a valuable contribution to the literature by providing a comprehensive resource for jurists, policy-makers and the business community alike, as they work towards adapting the bill of lading so that it might be successfully applied in electronic form.

Cette étude montre comment la création d’un Mécanisme de règlement des différends, dont la juridiction est obligatoire pour régler les litiges entre les Membres de l’Organisation mondiale du commerce (OMC), participe au développement du droit international, tant sur le plan normatif qu’institutionnel. Les organes du Mécanisme jouent un rôle crucial dans la centralisation de l’application du droit international des échanges du fait de leur place au sein de la structure de l’OMC, et en raison des compétences juridictionnelles qu’ils exercent. Toutefois, l’action unilatérale des Membres de l’Organisation reste déterminante pour le bon fonctionnement de ce Mécanisme. La saisine de l’Organe de règlement des différends (ORD) sur requête unilatérale, de même que la mise en oeuvre de contre-mesures en cas d’inexécution des décisions de l’ORD, en sont les meilleures preuves. En outre, les rapports des groupes spéciaux (GS) et de l’Organe d’appel (OA) incorporés à ces décisions constituent un droit dérivé jurisprudentiel d’une importance toujours croissante. Enfin, le Mécanisme est au service d’une institution internationale qui n’est pas close sur elle-même. En effet, les organes du Mécanisme interprètent les traités de l’OMC conformément aux règles du droit international coutumier. Et, la production juridique de ces organes est un facteur de modification des normes des ordres juridiques des Membres de l’Organisation, ainsi que des Accords commerciaux régionaux (ACR) auxquels les Membres peuvent être parties. / Whatever the future of the WTO may be, the Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM) as an intergovernmental dispute settlement system is a key institution for the evolution of International Law. Firstly, its compulsory jurisdiction contributes to the structural development of the international legal system by ensuring the centralization of the WTO Law application and a multilateral control on the Member States behaviours. Yet, factors of the DSM success, such as the panel establishment by a Member unilateral request, or such as the complainant Member countermeasures used to make a defender Member comply with the recommendations and rulings of the Dispute Settlement Body(DSB), underline the fact that States remain the major actors of the International legal system.Secondly, the case-law of the DSM (more than 450 cases) is considerable compared to any othercase-law of an inter-governmental litigation settlement organ. At last, the panels and the AppelateBody (AB) apply in their reports the customary international rules to interpret WTO treaties and thus the Understanding on Rules and Procedures governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU).Accordingly, the DSB decisions shall have a great impact on the whole normative development of the international legal system. And eventually, DSB decisions may affect the undergoing change ofthe Members domestic legal systems, and the Regional Trade Agreements (RTA).

La problématique générale abordée dans cette thèse est la suivante : Peut-on continuer à libéraliser les échanges au niveau mondial sans simultanément faire respecter les règles de protection de l’environnement ?L’hypothèse d’une gouvernance mondiale pour un développement du durable du commerce et de l’environnement est-t-elle possible ?Ce débat relève d’une question fondamentale qui, historiquement, a souvent été abordée mais sans être jamaisréglée. Aujourd’hui, dans le contexte de crise actuelle et du processus de globalisation, il demeure d’une brûlante actualité.L’étude des relations du commerce et de l’environnement suscite un certain nombre d’interrogations, les interactions qui en découlent sont-elles compatibles.Les liens qui unissent l’économie et l’environnement sont désormais évidents, les effets de libération des échanges ont une incidence non négligeable sur l’environnement et inversement la protection de l’environnement influe nécessairement sur la nature de ces échanges.Les organisations et les institutions ayant pour objectif la protection de l’environnement sont- elles réellement efficaces ? Ne sont-elles pas trop éparpillées ? Ne manquent- elles pas de cohérence ?Les législations nationales et internationales sont- elles suffisantes ? Les dispositions sont-elles appliquées ?Dans un contexte ultra libéral, le phénomène de dérégularisation, semble favoriser l’épanouissement des activités économiques et financières au détriment d’un renforcement des mesures environnementales.Devant un tel constat, il semble de plus en plus opportun de parvenir à un rééquilibrage de la gouvernance mondiale en faveur de l’environnement. Quelles pourraient être, le cas échéant, les mesures à mettre en œuvre, les voies de conciliation envisageables pour harmoniser ces relations en apparence conflictuelles.Quelle est la position du droit international relatif à la protection de l’environnement face à celui du commerce.Il apparaît nécessaire d’envisager de combiner les règles du droit international du commerce fondées sur le dogme du libre échange et les impératifs vitaux du droit de la protection de l’environnement dans un cadre de développement durable.Doit-on envisager de créer pour cela une nouvelle enceinte internationale spécialisée qui régirait l’environnement mondial ? Ou au contraire renforcer une Organisation existante en la dotant d’une double compétence qui élaborerait un nouveau droit international du développement durable en édictant un corps de règles commerciales et environnementales unifiées et cohérentes ; (Une sorte d’international law of sustainable development) ?La transformation du système commercial multilatéral, le renforcement et le verdissement de ses structures apparaîsent comme des solutions possibles, pour parvenir à faire coexister les préoccupations environnementales et les exigences commerciales au sein d’un même cadre.Une autre gouvernance plus juste, plus équilibrée est possible, une mise en cohérence d’un ordre juridique environnemental et économique mondial n’est pas une utopie.Ce défi ambitieux représente probablement une occasion de juger de la nécessaire combinaison du droit de l’environnement et du commerce international. / Is the hypothesis of a more balanced global governance for the sustainable development ofboth trade and environment plausible?Are the institutions devoted to environmental protection really efficient?Are they not too scattered to be effective? Don’t they lack some kind of coherence?Can institutions in charge of trade development enforce environmental rules? Do they havethe means to do so?In an ultra-free market context the phenomenon of deregulation seems to favor thedevelopment of economic and financial activity at the expense of a strengthening ofenvironmental measures.It seems necessary to consider reconciling the rules of free trade-based international trade lawand the vital requirements of environmental protection law within the scope of sustainabledevelopment.Should then one contemplate creating a new specialized international body in charge ofgoverning the global environment? Or on the contrary, should one strengthen an alreadyexisting organization by granting it a dual competency , responsible for working out a newinternational sustainable development law by enacting a set of unified and coherent trade andenvironmental rules; ( A kind of international sustainable development law).The transformation of the multilateral system, the strengthening and the greening of itsstructures appear as possible solutions to handle both environmental concerns andcommercial requirements.This ambitious challenge of a fairer, more balanced global governance probably provides anopportunity to see how necessary it is to combine environmental law and international tradelaw; this coherence in global environmental and economic law seems possible.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:25:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Martim de Almeida Sampaio.pdf: 538101 bytes, checksum: 78b9147c5608027abec6a3a25606b786 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-06-27 / The sovereignty concept, beyond the centuries had acquired different meanings. Since the 20th Century, its concept have changed into a juridical category. After 1945, news States have emerged in the international field, as well the international organizations, and its have caused a profound changing in the sovereignty concept. Added to this fact, a new phenomena, designed by globalization affected dramatically the human, political, juridical and social relationship. The capitalism had experienced a cycle of prosperity, bringing with it a new problem to be faced by the humanity named global warming. The present paper ash to analyze different views to conclude, at last that the solution of this problem is over the juridical boundaries, as well the sustainable development, proposing a new and multidisciplinary view / O conceito de soberania, ao longo dos séculos, tem adquirido dimensões diferenciadas. A partir do século XX, adquire um contorno eminentemente jurídico. Após 1945, com o surgimento de novos Estados no plano internacional, bem como o surgimento das denominadas organizações internacionais, o conceito tradicional de soberania foi profundamente alterado. Aliado a este fato, temos um novo fenômeno denominado globalização, que afetou drasticamente as relações humanas, políticas, jurídicas e sociais. O capitalismo experimentou um ciclo de expansão e com ele trouxe, transversalmente, um novo problema a ser enfrentado pela humanidade denominado aquecimento global. O presente trabalho visa analisar as diversas vertentes deste tema para, ao final, apresentar uma conclusão que transcende ao campo jurídico, superando os limites concernentes ao desenvolvimento sustentável, propondo uma abordagem multidisciplinar

<p>The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 1980 (CISG) seeks to provide a standard uniform law for international sales contracts. This research paper analyses the rationale behind South Africa&rsquo / s delay in deciding whether to ratify the CISG, and its possible effect on trade with other nations. The CISG drafters hoped that uniformity would&nbsp / remove barriers to international sales thereby facilitating international trade. Ratification of the convention is only the beginning of uniformity / uniformity must then be extended to its application&nbsp / and interpretation. Not all countries have ratified the Convention yet they engage in international trade in goods: this state of affairs presents challenges since traders have to choose a national&nbsp / law that applies to their contract where CISG does not apply. This takes traders back to the undesirable pre-CISG era. On the other hand, those States that have ratified the convention face&nbsp / different challenges, the biggest one being a lack of uniformity in its interpretation. The problem of differing interpretations arises because some CISG Articles are vague leading to varied&nbsp / interpretations by national courts. Further, the CISG is still largely misunderstood and some traders from States that have ratified CISG exclude it from application. South Africa can only ratify an&nbsp / international instrument such as the CISG, after it has been tabled before Parliament, and debated upon in accordance with the Constitution. CISG&rsquo / s shortcomings, particularly regarding&nbsp / interpretation, make it far from certain that CISG would pass the rigorous&nbsp / legislative process. Nonetheless, the Constitution of South Africa requires the South African courts and legislature to promote principles of international law. The paper, therefore, examines, whether the Legislature has a constitutional obligation to ratify CISG. South Africa&rsquo / s membership of the WTO requires&nbsp / that it promote international trade by removing trade barriers. It is, therefore, vital for South Africa to be seen to be actively facilitating international trade. Even though the trade benefits which&nbsp / flow from ratification are not always visible in States that have ratified the CISG, there is some doubt whether South Africa can sustain its trade relations without ratifying the CISG. The paper shows that the formation&nbsp / of contracts under the South African common law is very similar to formation as set out under Part II of the CISG and if the CISG were to be adopted in South Africa, no major changes would be&nbsp / needed in this regard. International commercial&nbsp / principles as an alternative to the CISG still require a domestic law to govern the contract and would, therefore, leave South African traders in the&nbsp / same position they are in currently, where their trading relations are often governed by foreign laws. Ratifying CISG would certainly simplify contract negotiations particularly with regard to&nbsp / governing law provisions. Overall the advantages of ratification for South Africa far outweigh the shortcomings of the CISG, and ratification will assist in ensuring that South African traders get an&nbsp / opportunity to enter the international trade arena on an equal platform with traders from other nations. </p>

University of Macau / Faculty of Law