O presente trabalho pretende abordar o processo de execução penal sob o enfoque da Lei nº 7.210/84 e investigar se o exame criminológico realmente é hábil e imprescindível para fornecer subsídios para o julgador formar seu convencimento e tomar a decisão mais acertada no que concerne aos pedidos de progressão de regime e livramento condicional, de maneira a assegurar a efetividade da execução penal e ao mesmo tempo compatibilizar o interesse de reconquista da liberdade pelo condenado com a necessidade de se garantir a segurança social. Para isso, são feitas considerações acerca da Lei de Execução Penal, responsável por consolidar a natureza jurisdicional da execução penal, comentando-se o papel das partes e do juiz no processo executório. Na sequência, examina-se a disciplina da prova no âmbito da execução penal, em especial a prova pericial, uma vez que o exame criminológico é uma perícia. Após conceituar o exame criminológico e diferenciá-lo dos outros instrumentos de avaliação do apenado, comenta-se sobre a Lei nº 10.792/03, a partir da qual o exame criminológico deixou de ser exigência para aferir o requisito subjetivo do sentenciado. Analisa-se a dificuldade do magistrado de valorar as provas técnicas, justamente por não dispor de conhecimentos técnicos para contestar as conclusões apresentadas pelos peritos e, assim, exercer algum tipo de controle sobre aquilo que é afirmado, e o risco da aceitação acrítica dos laudos pelos julgadores, dando, indiretamente, o poder da decisão para o perito. / This work intends to show the criminal enforcement process under the focus of Law nº 7.210/84 and investigate whether the criminological examination is essential and able to offer elements to guide the judge to make a fair decision about the convicts requests, in order to ensure that the criminal enforcement process will be respected as well as it will make compatible the social reintegration of the convicted with the maintenance of a safe society. In this regard, comments about the Law of Penal Execution that gave the jurisdictional nature to the criminal enforcement will be done, describing the lawyers acts, the district attorneys activities and the judges work. Then the evidences system in the criminal enforcement process will be analyzed, paying particular attention to expert evidence, since the criminological examination is an expertise. After defining the criminological examination and comparing it with other assessment tools of the guilty party, it will be discussed the Law nº 10.792/03 that dismiss the criminological examination to find out the subjective requirement of the prisoner. Finally it will be analyzed the difficulty of the judge to evaluate the technical evidences, because it is out of his knowledge and for this reason he does not have the tools to contest the explanations and/or conclusions given by experts, therefore he can not control the affirmations and there is the risk of acceptance of the reports by the judge without critical sense, indirectly giving the power of decision to the expert.

in English The purpose of this master's thesis is to analyse the interfaces between international arbitration and litigation within the Brussels' jurisdictional regime. Arbitration has always been excluded from the scope of the Brussels' regime. However, the exact scope of this exclusion was always unclear and subject to long lasting debates and disputes. The consequences of determining whether a certain issue falls within the exclusion or not are far reaching and may seriously jeopardise the enforceability of an arbitration agreement and the effectiveness of arbitration in general. The main problem connected with the uncertainty regarding the actual scope of the arbitration exclusion, is the risk of parallel proceedings and conflicting judgements. Firstly, this thesis provides a general characteristic of alternative dispute resolution with focus on international arbitration and sources of its regulation. The overview of the history of the arbitration exclusion follows in order to create a foundation for the following analysis of the exclusion itself. The core part of the thesis aims to determine the scope of the arbitration exclusion, mainly through the analysis of the CJEU's case law and relevant literature. Special attention is paid to the judgements on validity of an arbitration agreement and...

Title: Jurisdictional Immunity of States Abstract The major purpose of this diploma thesis is to clarify the situation of jurisdictional immunity and immunity from enforcement measures of states. This thesis is composed of two main parts. In the first part the institute of jurisdictional immunity of states is explained. The first part is divided into several chapters which are dedicated to the specific aspects of jurisdictional immunity. The first chapter deals with the theoretical terms which are closely related the topic such as sovereignty of state and jurisdiction. It was also necessary to explain the difference between the state acts iure imperii and iure gestionis. The following chapter is dedicated to the explanation of the historical evolution of this institute documented by the most significant decisions of national courts which have strongly influenced forming of the state immunities. The legal sources are described in the following chapter, a special attention is paid to the international treaties, national legal acts and also to the situation in the Czech Republic. The last chapter of the first part deals with the exceptions from jurisdictional immunity. The second part of the thesis is focused on the topic of state immunity from enforcement measures. This institute is a secondary immunity of...

This research sought to explain the emergence of the Wyoming Core Area Strategy (WCAS), a state-based Greater Sage Grouse conservation plan. It presents a theoretical framework that is based on and adds nuance to the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The hypothesis this study explored was: if a subsystem's jurisdiction is threatened by a hierarchically superior subsystem's policy outputs and this jurisdiction is necessary to meet the threatened subsystem's goals, then policy change may occur as a result of a strategy by the agents in the threatened subsystem. The data used to examine the hypothesis included expert interviews, historical documents, and interviews from media sources (secondary source interviews). The hypothesis was supported; the WCAS emerged because the Endangered Species Act listing outputs within the Species Conservation Policy Subsystem threatened the Wyoming Land Use Policy (WLUP) Subsystem's jurisdiction, which was necessary to meet the WLUP Subsystem's economic and lifestyle goals; the Governor of Wyoming drove the development and enactment of the WCAS as a strategy to retain jurisdiction. The research demonstrated that in order to fully account for the WCAS's emergence, a less mechanistic view of the framework, one that accounts for the ability of agents in a subsystem to act strategically, was needed. The research also demonstrated that the Greater Sage Grouse conservation benefited from the ESA listing process despite its warranted but precluded listing status. The time frame the research explored was 2002 through March 2012. / Master of Arts

Tarybos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 1346/2000 dėl bankroto bylų yra keturiasdešimties metų pastangų harmonizuoti tarpvalstybinio bankroto jurisdikcijos taisykles Europos Sąjungos kontekste rezultatas. Derinant dviejų tarptautinio bankroto reguliavimo modelių – universalaus ir teritorinio – principus, reglamente įtvirtinamos skirtingos jurisdikcijos taisyklės priklausomai nuo to, ar keliama pagrindinė ar šalutinė (teritorinė) bankroto byla. Magistriniame darbe aptariamas jurisdikciją iškelti pagrindinę bankroto bylą lemiančio kriterijaus – pagrindinių turtinių interesų vietos – turinys. Darbe daroma išvada, jog reglamente nėra nustatyta aiškaus pagrindinių turtinių interesų vietos turinio. Tai skatina nevienodą reglamento nuostatų, susijusių su teismo jurisdikcija iškelti skolininkui pagrindinę bankroto bylą, aiškinimą ir taikymą Europos Sąjungos valstybėse narėse. Jurisdikcijų kolizijos problema reglamente sprendžiama įtvirtinant pirmumo taisyklę, pagal kurią sprendimas iškelti bankroto bylą turi būti automatiškai pripažįstamas visose kitose valstybėse narėse nuo tada, kai sprendimas įsiteisėja bankroto bylą iškėlusio teismo valstybėje narėje. Darbe aptariamos palankesnės teisinės padėties ieškojimo galimybės. Autorius daro išvadą, jog pasirinktu reguliavimu vienas iš reglamento tikslų – panaikinti tiesines prielaidas palankesnės teisinės padėties ieškojimui perkeliant turtą ar teismo procesą iš vienos valstybės narės į kitą – nėra iki galo pasiektas. Šią prielaidą lemia dvi... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Council Regulation 1346/2000 on Insolvency Proceedings is the outcome of forty years of efforts to harmonize the rules regarding the jurisdictional issues on cross-border insolvency in the context of European Union. By combining the two models of international insolvency proceedings – universality and territoriality – the Regulation provides different jurisdictional rules on cross-border insolvency proceedings depending on whether the main insolvency proceedings or the secondary insolvency proceedings are going to be opened. The Master thesis deals with the content of the category determining the jurisdiction to open the main insolvency proceedings, i.e. the centre of main interests. As a result the Thesis concludes that the Regulation does not provide the explicit content of the centre of main interests’ category. Therefore it encourages the different interpretation and application of Regulation’s provisions related to the opening the main insolvency proceedings by the courts of Member States. Regulation deals with issue regarding the jurisdictional conflicts by determining the priority rule under which the judgment opening the insolvency proceeding should be automatically recognized in all other Member States from the time that it becomes effective in the State of the opening of proceedings. Master thesis deals with the issues regarding the seeking to obtain a more favorable legal position (forum shopping). The Author concludes that on of the main aims of this Regulation –... [to full text]

« Lorsque, à l’occasion d’une instance en cours devant une juridiction, il est soutenu qu’une disposition législative porte atteinte aux droits et libertés que la Constitution garantit, le Conseil constitutionnel peut être saisi de cette question sur renvoi du Conseil d’Etat ou de la Cour de cassation… ». Le nouvel article 61-1 de la Constitution du 4 octobre 1958 a ouvert un champ contentieux inconnu en France : celui de la constitutionnalité de la loi en vigueur. Le pouvoir de révision constitutionnelle a renforcé et étendu la compétence d’une institution à caractère juridictionnel, le Conseil constitutionnel, bénéficiant d’une qualité spécifique d’attribution tirée de la source constitutionnelle. Dans un vocabulaire juridique largement admis, le juge constitutionnel est distinct d’autres catégories de juges : « juges ordinaires », ou « internationaux ». La question initiale est alors la suivante : pourquoi peut-il être fondé juridiquement de penser et de promouvoir le postulat, selon lequel le contrôle de la constitutionnalité des lois doit s’exercer de façon concentrée ? Parce qu’il apparaît qu’en France, le discours sur le juge constitutionnel et la justice constitutionnelle procède non d’un discours interne au système juridique (discours du droit) mais sur un discours externe (discours sur le droit), celui des juristes savants et de la prétention à connaître de façon scientifique l’objet juridique.Faisant le choix d’un paradigme herméneutique pour la connaissance juridique, le présent travail propose de traiter la question de la spécificité de l’office juridictionnel dans l’opération d’application du droit qui s’y rattache. La spécificité de la norme constitutionnelle fonde celle d’une fonction constitutionnelle au sein de l’ordre juridique, permettant de modéliser la voie d’un espace processuel de résolution éthique des conflits d’interprétation constitutionnelle. / “If, during proceedings in progress before a court of law, it is claimed that a legislative provision infringes the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, the matter may be referred by the Conseil d’État or by the Cour de Cassation to the Constitutional Council…”The new article 61-1 of the Constitution of October 4th, 1958, strengthens the constitutional review of laws in France. For that purpose, the jurisdictional remit of the Constitutional Council has been extended. By its constitutional habilitation, this institution would be in a position to benefit from the recognition of a special authority. In the prevailing legal vocabulary, to describe a legal system such as the French one, the constitutional judge is singled out from other judges (“ordinary” judges for example, etc.).Therefore, the first question to be asked is: why should it be legally founded to think and promote the basic premise which is that the constitutional review of laws shall be exercised by a single body? In France indeed, developments about the constitutional judge or constitutional justice don’t stem from an internal perspective of the juridical system but originates from the external discourse of learned lawyers who ambition to scientifically approach law.With a hermeneutical paradigm for legal knowledge, this study tries to deal with the question of a judicial office through a process of normative concretization. In this view, the characteristics of the constitutional norm found a constitutional function into the legal order. Then, it seems to be possible to imagine a processual space allowing the ethical resolution of interpretative conflicts.

L’Etat de Droit demeure une réalité dans les Républiques du Mali et du Sénégal, pour preuve l’organisation récurrente d’élections concurrentielles dont les résultats sont acceptés par les perdants. Cette participation démocratique témoigne l’intérêt suscité par les politiques de décentralisation. Ces dernières apportent une réponse appropriée au développement local. En outre, l’absence de partis ethniques ou religieux atteste l’ancrage d’une véritable démocratie. Celle-ci se vérifie dans les espaces d’interpellation démocratique au cours des débats. Ces forums bénéficient de l’expertise inestimable de la société civile. Mais, le contrôle juridictionnel contribue davantage au règne du droit car il participe à la régulation de l’activité des pouvoirs publics, à la protection des libertés publiques et de la liberté individuelle. / Legally constituted state remains a reality in Mali and Senegal Republics, a piece of evidence the recurrent organization of competition elections which results are accepted by the losers. This democratic participation proves the interest demonstrated by decentralization politics. The latter constitute the fast track at local development. In addition, the absence of ethnic or religious parties testifies the anchor of true democracy. This one is confirmed in the democratic interpellation space during debates. These forums receive invaluable civil society expertise. But, the jurisdictional control more contributes to the rule of law because it participates in the regulation of authorities activity, in the protection of civil liberties and personal freedom.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:48:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Andre Guilherme Pereira Perfeito.pdf: 3054360 bytes, checksum: 8d87f333e047a6920da6f98fa9d61477 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-08-29 / This work aim to organize the main contributions of Brazilian economists (both orthodox and heterodox) about the high interest rates level in Brazil under the current economic crises (2008-2013), and also point out the Keynesian critic about those readings under the Liquid Preference theory of interest. To achieve this goal the work is divided in 3 chapters and also a conclusion where we state our opinion about the high level of interest rate in Brazil and point out problems for further research / O presente trabalho busca trazer as contribuições de economistas brasileiros (tanto ortodoxos como heterodoxos) sobre a persistência de elevadas taxas de juros no Brasil à luz da conjuntura econômica recente (2008 a 2013) bem como fornecer um contrapronto crítico sob o ponto de vista da literatura keynesiana onde temos no corolário da Preferência pela Liquidez os fundamentos da taxa de juros monetária. Para tanto organizamos a presente dissertação em três capítulos mais uma conclusão onde apontaremos nossa própria opinião sobre as teses apresentadas bem com sugestões de encaminhamento sobre o tema

Submitted by PPG Direito (ppgdir@pucrs.br) on 2018-06-25T15:39:42Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MARINA_DAMASCENO_DIS.pdf: 1287729 bytes, checksum: d08b6177aa2b3735020a5895f295cda2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2018-06-29T17:04:41Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MARINA_DAMASCENO_DIS.pdf: 1287729 bytes, checksum: d08b6177aa2b3735020a5895f295cda2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-29T17:11:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MARINA_DAMASCENO_DIS.pdf: 1287729 bytes, checksum: d08b6177aa2b3735020a5895f295cda2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-27 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / The present dissertation aims to analyze the jurisdictional policies that assist in the construction of a consensus culture. In order to do so, it critically investigates the propositions used in the preliminary hearing of conciliation or mediation brought by the Civil Procedure Code of 2015 (CPC/15). From a deductive approach method, starting from the ideas related to the transformation occurred in the society and, consequently, going through the consolidation of new forms to regulate litigation ? adequate methods of conflicts resolution ? concluding with the analysis of the preliminary hearing that aims the reach of consensus, foreseen in article 334 of the CPC/15. It can be concluded that a culture of consensus is not achieved by imposing a legal device, but through policies that effectively encourage its application, which cannot be restricted solely to the Judiciary. Therefore, the preliminary hearing, in essence, is beneficial to the realization of a jurisdictional policy, once it allows a consensual dialogue before a statement of defense is offered. If critically considered the models exposed by the legislator, there is a distortion in its arguments, which in article 334 prioritize the reduction of numbers through a legal imposition, thereby becoming indifferent or even harmful its application, as it ends up being considered only a mere procedural step. / A presente disserta??o tem por objeto a an?lise das pol?ticas jurisdicionais que auxiliam na constru??o de uma cultura do consenso. Para tanto, investiga criticamente as proposi??es utilizadas na audi?ncia preliminar de concilia??o ou media??o trazida pelo C?digo de Processo Civil de 2015 (CPC/15). A partir de um m?todo dedutivo de abordagem, partindo das ideias relativas ? transforma??o na sociedade e, consequentemente, ? consolida??o de novas formas de regula??o de lit?gios ? meios adequados de resolu??o de conflitos ? at? a an?lise da audi?ncia preliminar com vistas ao consenso, prevista no artigo 334 do CPC/15. Conclui-se que uma cultura voltada ao consenso n?o se concretiza com a imposi??o de um dispositivo legal, mas por meio de pol?ticas que efetivamente incentivem sua aplica??o, as quais n?o podem estar restritas unicamente ao Poder Judici?rio. Diante disso, por mais que referida audi?ncia, em sua ess?ncia, mostre-se ben?fica ? concretiza??o de uma pol?tica jurisdicional, uma vez que possibilita um di?logo consensual antes do oferecimento da contesta??o. Se considerados criticamente os moldes expostos pelo legislador, h? uma distor??o em seus fundamentos, os quais, no artigo 334, priorizam a diminui??o de n?meros por meio de uma imposi??o legal, tornando-se, desse modo, sua aplica??o indiferente ou at? mesmo prejudicial, na medida em que acaba por transform?-la, muitas vezes, em mera etapa processual.

A morosidade da justiça brasileira e as causas relativas à demora da prestação jurisdicional têm se tornado um dos maiores desafios do Poder Judiciário, o qual, por muito tempo tem sido taxado de ineficiente pela sua forma de atuação na resolução dos conflitos. Mecanismos voltados para melhoria da qualidade dos prestados aos jurisdicionados, além da reorganização da estrutura interna do Poder Judiciário, são vistos pelo Conselho Nacional de Justiça, enquanto órgão de gestão e planejamento do judiciário nacional, como principais instrumentos para amenizar essa problemática. Nesse sentido, os tribunais de justiça de todo o País foram chamados a se alinharem aos macrodesafios do Poder Judiciário Nacional. Com esse objetivo, o Poder Judiciário Tocantinense, por meio de seu Planejamento Estratégico, definiu sua missão, qual seja, estar entre os melhores tribunais de justiça e ser reconhecido como o mais moderno, célere e eficaz, até 2020; formulou, também, objetivos e desafios a serem seguidos por todos que o integram. Nesse sentido, conhecer de que forma os envolvidos estão trabalhando e como os procedimentos estão sendo realizados torna-se fundamental para uma análise concreta acerca de suas contribuições para o alcance dos objetivos institucionais e missão do Poder Judiciário do Estado do Tocantins. Nessa perspectiva e considerando que a primeira instância exerce diretamente a atividade-fim do Poder Judiciário, este estudo delimitou a analisar alguns dos procedimentos de gestão e rotinas cartorárias adotadas pelas Varas Judiciais Cíveis de Comarcas de 3ª Entrância do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Tocantins, a fim de identificar os principais entraves considerados como responsáveis pela morosidade da Justiça, além de verificar de que forma as práticas cartorárias realizadas na primeira instância podem interferir nos resultados finais disponibilizados no Relatório Justiça em Números, elaborado pelo Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Para tanto, foram realizadas pesquisas bibliográficas sobre o assunto, bem como análise das normativas vigentes no TJTO, voltadas para o primeiro grau de jurisdição. Ademais, um capítulo foi destinado para um estudo comparativo entre dois Cartórios Judiciais Cíveis de Comarcas de 3ª Entrância do TJTO, onde foram descritos seus perfis e os resultados encontrados. Como produto final, foram propostas algumas ações consideradas fundamentais para o aprimoramento dos serviços prestados e à efetividade da justiça. / The slowness of the Brazilian justice and the causes related to delayed jurisdictional provision have become one of the major challenges of the Judiciary which, for a long time has been considered inefficient by its way of acting in the resolution of the conflicts. Mechanisms aimed at improvement the quality of the rendered services to the besides reorganizing the internal structure of the Judiciary are seen by the National Council of Justice, as the management and planning body of the national judiciary, as the main instruments to alleviate this problem. In this sense, the Courts of Justice of the whole country were called to align themselves up to the macro-challenges of the National Judicial Power. With this objective, the judiciary the state of Tocantins, through its Strategic Planning, defined its mission which is to be among the best Courts of Justice and be recognized as more modern, swift and effective until 2020. And formulated objectives and challenges to be followed by all who integrate it. In this sense, to know how the members of the judiciary of Tocantins are working and the way that the procedures are done it becomes fundamental for a concrete analysis about its contributions to the achievement of the institutional objectives and mission of the Judiciary Power of the State of Tocantins which is to be among the best Courts of Justice and recognized as being more modern, faster and 2020. From this perspective and considering that the first instance directly exercises the final activity of the Judiciary this study delimited to analyze some of the management procedures and management routines adopted by the Judicial Courts of input of 3rd input of Justice of the State of Tocantins identifying the main obstacles considered responsible for the morosity of justice. In addition to verifying how the clerk practices at first instance may interfere with the final results provided in the Justice Report in Numbers prepared by the National Council of Justice. For this purpose, bibliographic research was done on the subject as well as an analysis of the regulations in TJTO to the first degree of jurisdiction. In addition, a chapter was designed for a comparative study between two Civil Judicial Offices of third-order input of the TJTO, where their profiles were described, as well as the results found. As a final product, some actions considered fundamental for the improvement of services rendered and effectiveness of justice were proposed.