O presente trabalho tem como objetivo: Compreender a lógica da ética da psicanálise partindo de uma análise das formulações propostas por Lacan no Seminário VII, comparando-a com a lógica que formaliza as formas de gozo do Seminário XX, e articulando as possibilidades de uma releitura da ética a partir de tal lógica. Para tanto precorremos o seguinte caminho para nossa pesquisa: Primeiramente, analisaamos o panorama ético do Seminário VII, partindo da critica lacaniana à ética de Aristóteles e de Kant; em seguida discutir os impasses da ética apresentados no Seminário VII, marcando a lógica da sexuação como uma escolha possível de Lacan para a formalização desses impasses; finalmente, utilizar as modalidades lógicas resultantes do modos de gozo tal como Lacan as articula no Seminário XX, na releitura das proposições do seminário da ética. Do ponto de vista do método, trata-se de uma pesquisa teórico-conceitual, epistemologicamente orientada, cujo eixo metodológico principal é uma análise comparativa entre duas abordagens distintas de Lacan sobre o tema da ética. Nossa intenção é contrapor os conceitos envolvidos em ambas as abordagens, retirando desse embate consequências teorias e praticas para a ética da psicanálise; também intencionamos, contrapor as lógicas que sustentam cada momento do ensino de Lacan, marcando as similitudes e as diferenças / The objective of the present work is: understanding the logic of the ethics of psychoanalysis initiating from an analysis of the formulations proposed by Lacan in Seminar VII comparing it with the logic that formalises the forms of jouissance in Seminar XX and articulating the possibilities of a reassessment of the ethic related to such logic. To do so, we proceeded along the following path in our research: firstly, we analysed the ethical panorama of Seminar VII from the Lacanian critique to the ethics of Aristotle and Kant; then, we continued discussing the obstacles of the ethics presented in Seminar VII setting out the logic of sexuation as a possible choice of Lacan for the formalisation of these obstacles. Finally, we utilized the logical manner resulting from the varying modes of jouissance as Lacan articulates them in Seminar XX in the rereading of the proposals of the seminar on ethics. From the point of view of the method followed, it is theoretical-conceptual research, epistemologically oriented, the methodological axis of which is a comparative analysis between two distinct approaches of Lacan regarding the ethical theme. Our intention is to compare and contrast the concepts involved in both approaches, observing from this discussion the theoretical and practical consequences for the ethics of psychoanalysis. We also proposed to contrast the logic which constantly underpins the teaching of Lacan, pinpointing both the similarities and differences

Nossa intenção com o presente trabalho foi pesquisar o estatuto teórico-clínico da sublimação ao longo do ensino de Lacan, enfatizando os momentos em que se detém no tema, fazendo avançar suas elaborações do conceito e partindo da hipótese de que a sublimação é um tratamento possível do gozo. Após o seminário em que se dedica de forma mais extensa ao tema da sublimação, em 1959-1960, no qual propõe a sublimação como elevação do objeto à dignidade da Coisa, o conceito aparece aqui e ali ao longo dos seminários subsequentes. Mas é em 1966-67 que a sublimação detém novamente a atenção de Lacan, que passa então a articulá-la com outros conceitos bastante importantes da teoria, quais sejam: alienação, repetição, acting out e passagem ao ato. Além disso, discute a articulação da sublimação com o ato sexual e, consequentemente, com a castração. Para isso, fará uso articulado do quadrângulo de Klein, das leis de Morgan e dos círculos de Euler, de modo a demonstrar a relação lógica entre os elementos. Desde as primeiras referências ao termo, passando pelas elaborações do seminário VII, nos anos de 1959-60, entendemos que é possível sustentar a vocação eminentemente clínica do conceito de sublimação como tratamento possível do gozo, em articulação com outros conceitos importantes no ensino de Lacan, como gozo, fantasia e ato. Partindo da sublimação definida como elevação do objeto à dignidade da Coisa, Lacan discute nos anos de 1966-1967 sua presença como satisfação ligada à repetição, mas que dela pode se afastar. A sublimação também se apresenta como saída do impasse do paradoxo da fantasia, que busca encobrir a relação sexual que não há. Propomos desde Lacan que a sublimação é um tratamento do gozo que permite que o sujeito, a partir da repetição, avance até um limiar, ainda que não o ultrapasse. O avanço está relacionado à sua possibilidade de prescindir do recalque, o que diferencia a sublimação do sintoma. A proximidade da sublimação com a relação sexual que não existe já se evidencia desde o seminário XIV e, no seminário XVI, proferido nos anos de 1968-1969, a sublimação retorna pela última vez no ensino de Lacan como estando do lado da mulher, articulada a não existência da relação sexual e como possibilidade privilegiada na perversão, o que deixa ainda mais claro, de nosso ponto de vista, seu estatuto de tratamento de gozo mortífero, na medida em que alude ao vazio da Coisa, criando a partir desse vazio. A partir desse percurso na sublimação, empreendemos uma discussão do documentário Elena, lançado no ano de 2013, sustentando que, com tal discussão, não se trata de aplicar a psicanálise à arte, mas sim de aplicar a arte à psicanálise, na medida em que a primeira permita à segunda avançar. Por evidenciar como toda a estrutura do filme se organiza em torno do vazio, ele permite que avancemos no debate sobre a sublimação e em sua elucidação como possibilidade de tratamento do gozo, em articulação com o ato em suas variáveis de acting out e passagem ao ato, tal como Lacan apresentara com os quadrângulos de Klein. Por último, propomos comentários suplementares que visam propor articulações que apontam caminhos pelos quais entendemos que a discussão sobre o tema da sublimação poderia ter continuidade. Aqui, propomos a articulação da sublimação com a psicose, com o sinthoma, tal como Lacan discute no seminário XXIII, e por último a relação da sublimação com o fim de análise. Nesse ponto, as discussões de Lacan sobre o quadrângulo de Klein nos fornecem indicações sobre a relação da sublimação com o ato analítico, que buscamos problematizar / Our intention with this paper was to research the theoretical and clinical status of sublimation throughout the teachings of Lacan, emphasizing the moments when he dwells on the topic, advancing his elaborations of the concept and working on the hypothesis that sublimation is a possible treatment of jouissance. After the seminar he most extensively dedicates to the topic of sublimation, in 1959-1960, when he proposes that sublimation raises an object to the dignity of das Ding, the concept appears sporadically throughout his subsequent seminars. But it is in 1966-67 that sublimation once again captures the attention of Lacan, when he begins to articulate it with other important concepts of the theory, namely: alienation, repetition, acting out and passage to the act. Additionally, he discusses the articulation of sublimation with the sexual act and, consequently, with castration. For this, he makes articulated use of Kleins quadrangle, De Morgans laws and Eulers circles to demonstrate the logical relation between the elements. From the very first references to the term through to the elaborations of seminar VII in 1959-60, we can see that it is possible to assert the eminently clinical vocation of the concept of sublimation as a possible treatment of jouissance, in articulation with other important concepts in the teachings of Lacan, such as jouissance, fantasy and act. Based on the definition that sublimation raises an object to the dignity of das Ding, Lacan in 1966-1967 discusses its presence as satisfaction that is linked to repetition, but that can be separated from it. Sublimation is also presented as a solution to the impasse of the paradox of fantasy, which seeks to disguise the sexual relationship that does not exist. We propose, drawing on Lacan, that sublimation is a treatment of jouissance that enables the subject, based on repetition, to advance towards a threshold, but not pass it. This advance is related to the subjects possibility of dispensing with repression, which distinguishes sublimation from the symptom. The proximity of sublimation to the sexual relationship that does not exist was evident since seminar XIV and, in seminar XVI, delivered in 1968-1969, sublimation returns for the last time to Lacans teachings as being feminine, articulated with the non-existence of the sexual relationship and as a privileged possibility in perversion, which further clarifies, in our opinion, its status as treatment of lethal jouissance, in that it alludes to the emptiness of das Ding, creating from this emptiness. Based on this analysis of sublimation, we embark on a discussion of the documentary Elena, released in 2013, asserting, through this discussion, that it is not about applying psychoanalysis to art, but instead art to psychoanalysis, since the former permits the latter to advance. By demonstrating how the entire structure of the film is organized around emptiness, it permits us to move forward the debate on sublimation and its elucidation as a possible treatment of jouissance, in articulation with the act in its variables of acting out and passage to the act, just as presented by Lacan with Kleins quadrangles. Finally, we make some additional comments that are intended to identify paths along which we consider the discussion on the topic of sublimation could be continued. Here, we propose the articulation of sublimation with psychosis, with the sinthoma, just as Lacan discusses in seminar XXIII, and finally the relationship of sublimation with the end of analysis. On this point, the discussions of Lacan on Kleins quadrangles provide us with indications about the relationship of sublimation with the analytical act, which we aim to address

O objetivo deste trabalho visa a prática da psicanálise lacaniana e sua fundamentação, tendo a civilização como parceira. Os impasses da civilização do risco e suas incidências sobre o corpo interessam-nos como viés para uma reflexão sobre a prática da psicanálise lacaniana na atualidade, especialmente em sua relação com os novos sintomas, sobretudo a partir do início do séc. XXI. O interesse em dialogar com a contemporaneidade visa fundamentar ainda mais a experiência da psicanálise aplicada, razão da forte presença dos psicanalistas nas instituições. Não nos detivemos apenas em aspectos da contemporaneidade. Para melhor situar na prática lacaniana a noção de falasser [parlêtre], a partir do último ensino de Lacan, resgatamos o debate sobre os universais, a aposta de Pascal e o mito hegeliano do senhor/mestre e do escravo. / This paper is related to the Lacanian psychoanalytical practice and its theoretical fundaments based on civilization as support . Civilization impasses on risk and their incidences on the body are considered as they lead to a reflection about the practice of Lacanian psychoanalysis in our days, especially when new symptoms are concerned, since the beginning of the 21st century. The interest in sustaining, with our contemporary times, a dialogue aims to add fundaments to applied psychoanalysis, considering the relevant presence of psychoanalysts in the institutions. This paper is nor more limited to what is found in contemporary times to better situate, in the Lacanian practice, the concept of parlêtre (by letter made) from Lacans last teaching. We have also recovered the debate about universals, Pascals bet and the Hegelian myth about the master and the slave.

Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2017-08-22T11:10:34Z No. of bitstreams: 1 rackelhagendeoliveira.pdf: 940515 bytes, checksum: 4b82fa6530e3d934a4db39ad05ff09f7 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-08-25T11:59:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 rackelhagendeoliveira.pdf: 940515 bytes, checksum: 4b82fa6530e3d934a4db39ad05ff09f7 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-25T11:59:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 rackelhagendeoliveira.pdf: 940515 bytes, checksum: 4b82fa6530e3d934a4db39ad05ff09f7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-17 / Esta pesquisa propõe investigar as principais referências teóricas utilizadas por Jacques Lacan para a construção da teoria do estágio do espelho e visa especificar o papel desempenhado por cada uma delas nessa construção. O intuito é contextualizar os principais conceitos relevantes ao tema a partir das suas fontes primárias e analisar a arquitetura conceitual interna dos trabalhos elegidos – tendo em vista as produções do autor publicadas no final da década de 1930 até meados dos anos 1950. Com a finalidade de recapitular essa trajetória, este trabalho visa traçar a gênese teórica de alguns conceitos fundamentais que marcaram o pensamento lacaniano no início de sua obra e resgatar as origens dos principais alicerces a partir dos quais Lacan constrói a teoria do estágio do espelho. Dentro desse quadro, aborda-se as principais referências da psicologia infantil do desenvolvimento, presentes nas obras de Charlotte Bühler, James Mark Baldwin e, sobretudo, Henri Wallon. Em seguida, recupera os experimentos da psicologia comparada, nos estudos de Louis Bolk e Wolfgang Köhler. Por fim, a partir das evidências apresentadas, trata-se de situar, precisamente, as principais perspectivas que Lacan aborda e adere em seu objeto de estudo, evidenciando as diferenças de concepções adotadas, quando estas forem relevantes ou importantes para a compreensão da teoria. / This research proposes to investigate the main theoretical references used by Jacques Lacan for the construction of the theory of the stage of the mirror and aims to specify the role played by each of them in this construction. The aim is to contextualize the main concepts relevant to the theme from their primary sources and to analyze the internal conceptual architecture of the chosen works - in view of the author's productions published in the late 1930s until the mid 1950s. To recapitulate this trajectory, this work aims to trace the theoretical genesis of some fundamental concepts that marked the Lacanian thought at the beginning of its work and to rescue the origins of the main foundations from which Lacan constructs the theory of the stage of the mirror. Within this framework, the main references of developmental child psychology are presented in the works of Charlotte Bühler, James Mark Baldwin and, above all, Henri Wallon. Then retrieves the experiments of comparative psychology in the studies of Louis Bolk and Wolfgang Köhler. Finally, from the evidence presented, it is a question of precisely situating the main perspectives that Lacan approaches and adheres to in his object of study, highlighting the differences of conceptions adopted, when these are relevant or important to the understanding of the theory.

[pt] Este trabalho percorre o contexto histórico no qual surge a Psicoterapia Institucional, para em seguida definir – sob o pilar da psicanálise lacaniana – seu público alvo, e por fim, apresentar seus conceitos mais importantes. Articulando tais conceitos tanto com formulações lacanianas quanto com o cotidiano institucional. Em seu anexo, apresenta dois textos inéditos em língua portuguesa, escritos recentemente por Jean Oury. / [en] This work covers the historical context in which the Institucional Psycotherapy appears, for after that defining - under the pillar of the psychoanalysis - its public, and finally presenting its more important concepts. Articulating such concepts in such a way with Lacan formularizations. In its annex, it presents two unknown texts in Portuguese language, writings recently for Jean Oury and others.

Lacan, diagnostiquant très tôt le déclin de l’ordre symbolique patriarcal traditionnel,élabore dans les années 70 les outils conceptuels aptes à saisir la dérégulation moderne des jouissances et les nouveaux régimes normatifs qui cherchent à les juguler. L’apport de la psychanalyse au questionnement philosophique sur les normes tient au caractère radicalement hors normes de cette expérience, qui permet de théoriser non seulement les processus de normalisation par l’Autre mais la normativité subjective et son pouvoir subversif.Ce travail vise à démontrer l’irréductible spécificité de la psychanalyse, là où les généalogies foucaldiennes la rabattent sans cesse sur d’autres discours (médical, psychiatrique,familial, juridique, spirituel…).Nous y montrons : 1/ que les thèses structuralistes du Lacan des années 50 qui promeuvent la Loi du Nom-du-Père comme Norme fondatrice ciblaient l’infléchissement normalisant de l’Ego psychology ; 2/ que la psychanalyse, au-delà des normes vitales et sociales, vise au traitement purement singulier et inventif de la jouissance par la lettre ; 3/ qu’elle n’est donc pas une technique clinique catégorisante mais une éthique a-normative ; 4/ que le Lacan des années 70, ayant critiqué en profondeur ses propres axiomes, passe à l’envers de lui-même, via la pluralisation des Noms-du-Père et la généralisation du symptôme ; 5/ que Lacan aboutit à une conception purement immanente des processus normatifs, sans pour autant verser dans l’historicisme ou le relativisme foucaldien. Lacan soutient en effet l’ex-sistence d’un impossible et d’un réel qui trouent le plan des pratiques, dont la seule économie ne suffit pas à l’intelligibilité des normes. / Diagnosing at a very early stage the decline in the traditional symbolic order, Lacan developed in the 1970s the conceptual tools that would be appropriate for grasping the modern deregulation of different forms of enjoyment and the new normative regimes that seek to keep them in check. Psychoanalysis’s contribution to the philosophical enquiry into norms hinges on how such experience lies radically beyond norms, allowing for a theorization not only of the processes of normalization by the Other, but also of subjective and subversive normalcy. This study demonstrates the specific irreducibility of psychoanalysis, where Foucauldian genealogies constantly downscale it to other discourses (medical, psychiatric, familial, legal,spiritual).We show: i. that Lacan’s structural theses of the 1950s promoting the Law of the Nameof-the-Father as a founding Norm, take aim at the normalizing drift of Ego Psychology; ii. that psychoanalysis targets, beyond the norms of life and society, a singular treatment of enjoyment through the letter; iii. that it is not, therefore, a technique that establishes categories, but rather ana-normative ethics; iv. that the Lacan of the 1970s, having offered an in-depth critique of his ownaxioms, proceeded to the nether side of his own teaching via a pluralisation of the Names-of-the-Father and a generalization of the symptom; v., that his thought culminated in a purely immanent conception of normative processes, while steering clear of historicism or Foucauldian relativism.Indeed, Lacan maintains the ex-sistence of an impossible and a real that puncture the plane of practice, whose economy alone is not sufficient for an intelligibility of norms.

Ce projet porte sur les romans de john banville et avec les théories psychanalytiques. l'argument principal de cette recherche sera que le narrateur névrosé qui est utilisé dans les œuvres de banville réalise une conscience qui est proche de ce que toshio kawai a appelé 'la conscience post-moderne' qui est associé à nombreux attributs du postmodernisme (en particulier les théories de baudrillard). ce nouveau type de conscience a pour sa composante d'un type de distance, ou plutôt, une dissociation de la notion de la réalité et elle est associée à l'arbitraire, (surtout revendication de lacan que l'objet de notre désir est arbitraire), ainsi que la virtualité (baudrillard, adorno et horkheimer). selon kawai, encore une fois, il existe une conscience moderne qui a comme conséquence un degré de répression dans la psyché de l'individu qui, prenant la parole psychanalytique, suggèrent un certain degré de névrose ou à des moments de psychose sens partiel ou total sentiment d'être perdu entre l'imagination et réalité.la recherche vise à explorer les questions initiales suivantes:1 - quelle est la relation entre la névrose et ce qu'on appelle le postmodernisme?2 - comment cette relation peut être vu dans la fiction de banville?3 – dans quelle façon banville utilise un narrateur névrotique pour obtenir un effet post-moderne?4 - si, selon kawai, la modernité est associée à la répression et donc la névrose, alors, est-il possible de penser que la postmodernité est associée à la psychose, de schizophrénie ou d'autres anomalies psychopathologiques? comment cela se voit dans la fiction de banville?5 - y a t-il un mouvement de modernisme au postmodernisme dans la fiction de banville?comment cela peut-il être considéré dans un contexte psychanalytique? / The present project sets to complement the previous readings of the “self” in John Banville’s fiction by reproblematizing the precariousness of the author’s “subject of narration.” It examines the way in which the author constantly manipulates various narrative elements and consequently creates new experiences. Jacques Lacan’s understanding of the relation between the subject and the signifier, I argue, provides an excellent set of tools to address the way in which the notion of subjectivity is dissected, enhanced, and even extended, in Banville’s philosophically imbued fiction. The central thesis is that Banville creates a narrative universe in which his protagonists’ perception moves in interesting ways as the aspects of the Lacanian triad (the Symbolic, the Imaginary and the Real) are reshuffled, resulting in a precarious sense of self and reality. Although other thinkers (especially the ones hinted at in the narrative, most notably, de Man, Kleist, and Nietzsche) are drawn upon, the theoretical backbone relies on Lacan’s theory of subjectivity as well as recent Lacanian thinkers, most notably, Slavoj Žižek, Mladen Dollar, and Stijn Vanheule. Žižek’s reading of Lacan is of special interest to this study as he theorizes virtuality as a concept using Lacan’s triadic model. In addition, using Žižek’s definition of postmodernism as “symbolic inefficacy” allows us to shed new light on the long debate over Banville’s modernism versus his postmodernism. The dissertation consists of three parts. The first part focuses on Banville’s earlier work, namely, Birchwood, Mefisto, and The Book of Evidence. Here, I examine how the narrators’ preoccupation with finding certainty and truth results in a psychotic universe in Mefisto and a hysteric one in The Book of Evidence. Focusing on the latest trilogy, Eclipse, Shroud, and Ancient Ligh the second part examines the way in which Banville uses the category of the uncanny to create a Gothic narrative in Eclipse. Moreover, the concept of object a is used to demonstrate how the subject/object distinction collapses and gives rise to the Real dimension of the subject. The third and final part argues that the narrators seek to counter the undecidability generated in their uncanny narrations via the rehabilitation of the surface, one with which they hope to restore their precarious sense of self. Both chapters in this part address Banville’s engagement with Paul de Man’s deconstructive theory of language and representation and argue that Banville stages de Man’s ideas as well as his life-story in order to advance his own conception of representation and selfhood. Friedrich Nietzsche, I claim in both chapters, provides the narrators with a way out of the predicament posited by de Man. The underlying idea explored throughout the project is that Banville’s epistemological project can be summed up as an attempt to find a mode of articulation independent from the Symbolic order as most of his narrators, in one way or another, express a fundamental incredulity towards the Symbolic Other. By stripping reality of its Symbolic underpinnings, the Banvillian protagonist allows the Real to emerge and then domesticates it as magic. He does so using the surface of the written pages of his narrative, a surface onto which he can fuse word and image.

Cette recherche vise à répondre aux critiques que certains auteurs de la théorie queer ont adressé à la théorie lacanienne, en l´accusant d´homophobe. Nous proposons une nouvelle approche de la sexualité humaine qui ne sera plus instaurée à partir de l´ordre symbolique du Complexe d´Œdipe. À la fin de son enseignement, Lacan reconnaît qu´ « Il n´y a pas de rapport sexuel », et avec cet aphorisme il nous ouvre la porte vers un nouveau paradigme orienté vers le réel : la jouissance qui vise l´impossible de la relation sexuelle. Cette jouissance substitutive, comme l´a nommé Jacques-Alain Miller, ne distingue pas entre névrose et perversion. Cette nouvelle lecture qui va au-delà de la clinique structurelle surgit du nœud borroméen, c´est-à-dire, de ce qui fait tenir ensemble les registres symbolique, réel et imaginaire du désir et de la jouissance. Nous prétendons surmonter l´Œdipe par le biais du tout dernier enseignement de Lacan. Pour ce faire, nous avons revisité le célèbre cas de « la jeune homosexuelle » de Freud, à partir des nouveaux éléments de son histoire publiés dans sa biographie intitulée Sidonie Csillag, Homosexuelle chez Freud. Lesbienne dans le siècle. Grâce à cette nouvelle conception borroméenne nous regarderons l´homosexualité sous un autre angle. Notre but sera de trouver les convergences entre ce nouveau paradigme borroméen de la psychanalyse et la théorie queer. / This investigation aims to respond to the critiques certain authors of queer theory have addressed to Lacanian theory, namely the accusation of homophobia. At the end of his teaching, Lacan recognized « There is no sexual relation »; and with this aphorism, he opened the door to a new paradigm oriented by the real: jouissance that aims at the impossible of the sexual relation. This substitutive jouissance, as Jacques-Alain Miller named it, doesn’t distinguish between neurosis and perversion. This new reading which goes beyond the structural clinic springs from the Borromean knot, in other words, that which holds the symbolic, real, and imaginary registers of desire and jouissance together. We purport to overcome the Oedipus complex by way of the very last Lacanian teaching. In order to do so, we revisited Freud’s extremely well-known case of the “young homosexual woman”, starting from new historical elements published in her biography entitled, Sidonie Csillag: Jeune Homosexuelle chez Freud, lesbienne dans le siècle. We will regard homosexuality from another angle thanks to the new Borromean conception. Our goal shall be to find the convergences between this new Borromean paradigm of psychoanalysis and Queer theory.

Le travail consiste à articuler la question de l'amour avec celle de l'époque à partir de la catégorie de discours telle qu'elle a été proposée par Lacan. Ceci afin de repérer les incidences du lien social contemporain - dans sa double détermination par les logiques consuméristes et marchandes et par le discours de la science - sur les liens amoureux. / Based on the works of Jacques Lacan and Cornelius Castoriadis, we propose an articulation of structure and history in order to build a psychoanalytic approach of the impacts of our era — in its dual determination by consumerist market logic, and the scientific discourse — on loving relationships. We have been able to propose a psychoanalytic, structural and historical approach of the causes, the conditions and consequences of indifference to things of love induced by capitalist discourse structure and the socio-historical purview witch is linked to it.

Este trabalho visa estabelecer uma relação entre literatura e psicanálise. Muito já se falou sobre o cruzamento entre essas duas práxis distintas, independentes e autônomas. Hoje, parece inevitável interligá-las, sobretudo, teoricamente. A idéia deste projeto nasce, inicialmente, do desejo de aproveitar uma relação pouco explorada entre dois autores franceses contemporâneos. Falecidos num intervalo de seis meses entre o final de 1981 e começo de 1982, Jacques Lacan e Georges Perec fizeram história na cena intelectual francesa do final do século XX. A fim de mostrar a amplitude dos estudos em torno da obra destes dois autores, cada um em seu território, é possível dizer que ambos se preocuparam, primordialmente, com a questão da letra, seja Lacan voltado para experiência analítica, seja Perec inteiramente imerso no campo literário. Situados na passagem do estruturalismo ao pós-estruturalismo francês, Lacan e Perec não se cruzaram diretamente. Gostaríamos de compreender as conseqüências de uma nova teoria do sujeito que se esboçava a partir da segunda metade do século XX, principalmente, a leitura que ambos fizeram de autores que freqüentaram e foram atravessados. Lacan deve ser visto como um analista. Perec tomado como um escritor. Porém, uma pesquisa de tal natureza pode se justificar pelos seguintes aspectos: 1. Ambos operam sobre o inconsciente. E daí decorre a enorme importância da obra e o ensino de Jacques Lacan. 2. Trata-se de difundir e disseminar um autor da maior envergadura, pouco conhecido e explorado no Brasil até hoje, que é o genial virtuose das letras e fenômeno literário internacional que é Georges Perec. / This dissertation aims to establish a relation between literature and psychoanalysis. A lot has been said about the crossing between those distinct praxis. Nowadays, it seams inevitable to interconnect at least theorically. The idea of this project arises initially from the wish to approach the relationship not explored until now from those two French contemporaneous authors. Deceased on interval of six months in the end of 1981 and the beginning of 1982, Jacques Lacan and Georges Perec made history in the intellectual French scene in the end of 20th century. To bring along the wideness of those researches, each one in your own territory, it´s possible to say that both are primordially with deep concern toward the subject of the letter. Lacan in the psychoanalytical experience and Perec submerse in the literary field. Lacan and Perec, placed from French structuralism and pos-structuralism, haven´t crossed directly. It would like to comprehend the consequences of the new theory of the subject that started from the second part of 20th century especially your studies across by other authors. Lacan must being seeing as an psychoanalyst. Perec as a writer. However a research of that nature must be justified by two aspects: 1. they operate of unconscious. This is the enormous importance of the work and teachings of Jacques Lacan. 2. It´s about to diffuse and disseminate a great author not known in Brazil until now, which is literary virtuous that is Georges Perec.