Submitted by Neusa Fagundes (neusa.fagundes@unioeste.br) on 2018-02-27T14:38:05Z No. of bitstreams: 2 André_Gallina2017.pdf: 1856721 bytes, checksum: b9572845f772a3d4c2da52bf9cecdb70 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-02-27T14:38:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 André_Gallina2017.pdf: 1856721 bytes, checksum: b9572845f772a3d4c2da52bf9cecdb70 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-18 / The capital structure has been studied since the mid-1950s, especially since Durand (1952), and the subject has been explored by Modigliani and Miller (1958), Myers and Majluf (1984), and others, always with different approaches over time. One of the theoretical fronts is the pecking order theory, led by Myers (1984) and Myers and Majluf (1984), which analyzes the influence of information asymmetry on the capital structure of organizations. Therefore, in order to verify the influence of the asymmetry on the capital structure of Brazilian and North American companies from 2011 to 2015, a panel data analysis was carried out, modeling variables linked to information asymmetry to verify if they influenced, or not, the indebtedness of the companies analyzed, in order to respond to the following research problem: "What is the influence of information asymmetry in determining the capital structure of Brazilian and US publicly traded companies in the period from 2011 to 2015?". Thus, it is expected that the study will contribute, in particular, to the accomplishment of the comparative analysis between the mentioned countries, identifying the behavior of the data and the adequacy of the companies to the precepts of the financial theories mentioned, emphasizing that the comparative analysis undertaken is the main gap in the study, given the scarcity of comparative studies within the capital structure. As for main findings, it was verified that the existence of lower information asymmetry indexes led to lower indebtedness in both Brazilian and North American companies, which is recommended by pecking order, that is, it was verified that in fact, the information asymmetry has an influence on corporate indebtedness. However, the beha vior of the variables in Brazilian and North American companies diverges, and not always the variables showed the expected behavior, according to what the theory suggested. In addition, differences in the economic environment, market structure, cost of credit and others may cause a result initially contrary to that predicted by the theory is not necessarily a divergent result. As a practical contribution of the study, when analyzing data from two different countries, a broader view is given, especially for the investor (as an external user of the accounting information) and the administrator (as internal user), about the debt behavior, and on which variables are able to affect this behavior, in particular to assess the influence of the variables related to the asymmetry of information in this theme. With this, it can be verified empirically as relevant business issues, such as corporate governance, influence the directions taken by companies. Finally, although the subject is widely studied, it remains available and with research gaps, with ample space for studies that contribute to the better understanding of the issue. / A estrutura de capital vem sendo estudada desde meados dos anos 1950, em especial a partir de Durand (1952), tendo o tema sido explorado ainda por Modigliani e Miller (1958), Myers e Majluf (1984), e outros, sempre com diferentes abordagens ao longo do tempo. Uma das frentes teóricas que se dedica ao tema é a pecking order theory, encabeçada por Myers (1984) e Myers e Majluf (1984), que analisa a influência da assimetria de informação na estrutura de capital das organizações. Diante disso, e visando verificar a influência da assimetria na estrutura de capital das empresas brasileiras e norte-americanas de 2011 a 2015, realizou-se uma análise com dados em painel, modelando-se variáveis ligadas à assimetria de informação para verificação se elas influenciaram, ou não, o endividamento das empresas analisadas, para responder ao seguinte problema de pesquisa: “Qual a influência da assimetria de informação na determinação da estrutura de capital de empresas brasileiras e americanas de capital aberto no período de 2011 a 2015?”. Com isso, espera-se que o estudo contribua, em especial, no sentido da realização da análise comparativa entre os países mencionados, identificando o comportamento dos dados e a adequação das empresas aos preceitos das teorias financeiras, salientando que a análise comparativa empreendida se apresenta como a principal lacuna do estudo, dada a escassez de estudos comparativos dentro da temática da estrutura de capital. Como principais resultados, verificou-se que a existência de menores índices de assimetria de informação conduziu a um menor endividamento tanto nas empresas brasileiras quanto nas norte-americanas, o que é preconizado pela teoria pecking order, ou seja, constatou-se que de fato a assimetria de informação exerce influência no endividamento empresarial. Contudo, o comportamento das variáveis nas empresas brasileiras e norte-americanas diverge, e nem sempre as variáveis apresentaram o comportamento esperado, de acordo com o sugerido pela teoria, além de que diferenças de ambiente econômico, de estrutura de mercado, de custo de crédito e outros podem fazer com que um resultado inicialmente contrário ao previsto pela teoria não seja, necessariamente, um resultado divergente. Como contribuição prática do estudo, ao analisar dados de dois países distintos, tem-se uma visão mais ampla, em especial para o investidor (como usuário externo da informação contábil) e do administrador (como usuário interno), sobre o comportamento da dívida e sobre quais variáveis são capazes de afetar esse comportamento, em especial de aferir qual a influência das variáveis ligadas à assimetria de informação nessa temática. Com isso, pode-se verificar empiricamente como questões empresariais relevantes, como a governança corporativa, influenciam nos rumos tomados pelas companhias. Por fim, embora o tema seja amplamente estudado, continua aberto e com lacunas de pesquisa, com amplo espaço para realização de estudos que contribuam com a explicação da questão.

The aim of this thesis is to perform an analysis of capital structure of joint stock companies based in the Czech Republic. The first part of the thesis introduces modern theories and main determinants of capital structure. Further it stakes out basic models used for testing the validity of mentioned theories and the methodology used. The second part of the thesis focuses on practical results of the analysis. The first chapter summarises descriptive analysis of the passive structure, the level of leverage, the composition of equity and liabilities of the joint stock companies. These ratios are judged mainly according to industry classification and the type of ownership. In the next step, the relationship between leverage and profitability is closely explored since it is thought to be one of the main determinants. In the last chapter, the models are applied to the sample of Czech companies with the effort to judge the validity of capital structure theories and to evaluate the effect of determinants on capital structure.

Problematika výběru kapitálové struktury byla a stále je často diskutována akademickou obcí již přes půl století a stále ještě nebylo dosaženo jednoznačného souladu, která teorie kapitálu a jaké determinanty ovlivňují kapitálovou strukturu. Modligliani a Miller (1958) zformulovali moderní teorii kapitálové struktury. Tvrdí, že pokud jsou splněny přísné podmínky, kapitálová struktura je irelevantní pro hodnotu společnosti. Avšak pokud nějaké předpoklady nejsou naplněny, kapitálová struktura se stává významná. Nyní, dvě hlavní teorie kapitálové struktury převládají – teorie hierarchického pořádku a trade-off teorie. Teorie hierarchického pořádku je vysvětlena informační asymetrií mezi manažery a ostatními lidmi. Toto způsobuje rozdílné ocenění vydaných cenných papírů danými skupinami lidí. Proto společnosti preferují vydat cenné papíry nejméně citlivé na dostupné informace. Pokud potřebují volné finance, nejdříve použijí vnitřní zdroje, následně dluh a jako poslední možností je vydání nového vlastního kapitálu. Trade-off teorie řeší rovnováhu mezi daňovým štítem dluhu a náklady finanční tísně. Důsledkem tohoto substitučního vztahu je optimální kapitálová struktura, kterou by se společnosti měly snažit získat a dále udržet. Mnoho výzkumu týkající se výběru kapitálové struktury již bylo provedeno a jeho výsledky jsou stále neurčité. Protože mnoho článků stále nabízí bezvýsledné závěry a jejich výsledky se liší v rámci zemí a skrz časové období, cílem mé práce je prozkoumat kapitálovou strukturu a determinanty kapitálové struktury v rámci Višegrádských zemí v období od 2002 do 2007. Hlavním přínosem této práce je prozkoumat data, která ještě nebyla před tím prozkoumána. Důvod, proč tomu tak je, může být obtížnost v získávání a zpracování dat. Již mnoho článků bylo napsáno o kapitálové struktuře, ale mnohé měly nedostatky. První výhodou mé práce je, že zkontroluji veškeré předpoklady mé analýzy. Znázorňuji, že heteroskedasticita a autokorelace jsou občas přítomny a snažím se je odstranit. Tímto se vyhnu zkresleným výsledkům. Další výhodou mého výzkumu je, že používám relativně velké množství vysvětlujících proměnných. Mnozí autoři záměrně vynechávají proměnné jako likvidita, růstové příležitosti nebo volatilitu tržeb (obchodní risk). Navíc používám tři druhy dluhů jako vysvětlované proměnné – celkový, dlouhodobý a krátkodobý, které nejsou také běžně používané. Dále používám dynamický vztah v zadluženosti, jelikož současná zadluženost může záviset na minulosti z důvodu setrvání nebo pouze částečnému přizpůsobení. Schopnost tohoto docílit je unikátní pro panelová data, která používám v této práci. Výsledkem je, že zadluženost má paměť a závisí na zadluženosti z minulých let. Hlavní závěry mohou být rozděleny do dvou skupin. Do první skupiny patří výsledky regrese z České republiky a Polska a druhé z Maďarska a Slovenska. Výsledky z první skupiny ukazují pozitivní vztah mezi zadlužeností českých a maďarských společností a tempem růstu společností a nedaňovým štítem, který je použit jako náhrada za daňový štít. Zatímco ziskovost, likvidita, struktura aktiv, obchodní riziko a velikost firmy je negativně korelována s dluhem. Tyto závěry podporují teorii hierarchického pořádku. Na druhou stranu, výsledky z Maďarska a Slovenska podporují trade-off teorii. V této druhé skupině struktura aktiv, ziskovost, velikost firmy je kladně korelována se zadlužeností, zatímco zbylé proměnné ukazují zápornou korelaci.

Bakgrund och problemdiskussion: Årligen sker uppstarter av nya företag men flera av dem läggs ned kort därefter. En faktor är svårigheterna till finansiering då externa finansiärer inte är benägna att ta risker och flera företag har dålig insikt om alternativen som finns när det kommer till val av finansiering. Därför anses det väsentligt att studera gapet genom ett antal mikro- och småföretag och diskutera finansieringsmetoder som de valt till sin verksamhet och hur det har påverkat företaget utifrån ägarfördelning och företagslivscykel.   Syfte: Uppsatsens syfte är att skapa en djupare förståelse och kunskap om mikro- och småföretags möjligheter att skaffa kapital för att säkerställa verksamhetens fortlevnad och tillväxt. Genom ökad förståelse ges ett bidrag till att underlätta val av finansieringsmetod och ge värdefulla kunskaper inom ämnet.   Metod: Uppsatsen är en kvalitativ studie där materialinsamling sker genom semistrukturerade intervjuer för att skapa en djupare förståelse från respondenterna. Med en komparativ studie sammanvävs faktorerna finansiering, företagslivcykel och ägarfördelning då det saknas forskning som behandlar ämnena tillsammans. Undersökningen är en flerfallstudie där 12 företag har valts ut för empirisk materialinsamling.   Slutsats: Anledningar till företagens olika finansieringssätt beroende på olika stadier i livscykeln beror snarare av aktiva val som företagen gjort. Då ingen tydlig koppling mellan vissa finansieringssätt och stadier i livscykeln, upptäcktes istället ett teoretiskt gap i livscykelmodellen. Ägarfördelning gjorde stor påverkan vid val av finansiering för studiens deltagande företag där tydlig koppling ges mellan vad varje ägare anser om ägarandelar och vilken finansiering som då väljs. / Background and problem discussion: Every year, new companies start up, several of them are shut down shortly thereafter. One factor is the difficulty of financing as external financiers are not inclined to take risks and several companies have poor insight about the alternatives that exist when it comes to the choice of funding. Therefore, it is considered essential to study the gap through a number of micro and small companies and discuss funding methods that they have chosen for their business and how it has affected the company based on ownership distribution and business life cycle.   Purpose: The purpose of the thesis is to create a deeper understanding and knowledge of the possibilities of micro and small companies to acquire capital in order to ensure the continuity and growth of the business. Through increased understanding, a contribution is made to facilitate the choice of financing method and provide valuable knowledge in the subject.   Method: The essay is a qualitative study in which material collection takes place through semi-structured interviews to create a deeper understanding of the respondents. With a comparative study, the factors financing, business life cycle and ownership distribution are combined where there is no research that deals with the topics together. The survey is a multiple-case study in which 12 companies have been selected for empirical material collection.   Conclusion: Reasons for the companies different funding methods depending on different stages of the life cycle are due rather to active choices made by the companies. Since no clear link between certain funding methods and stages in the life cycle, a theoretical gap was instead discovered in the life cycle model. Ownership distribution made a large impact on the choice of funding for the study's participating companies, where a clear connection is given between what each owner considers about ownership interests and what funding is then chosen.

This thesis investigates the relationship between sustainability performance and capital structure, measured using the ESG (environmental, social and governance) rating and the debt ratio. In the pursuit of analysing the relationship between the ESG rating and the debt ratio, this study investigates publicly listed companies within the EU/EEA due to its mutual legislative framework on sustainable finance. This research has the intention of shedding light upon if a company can use sustainability ratings to alter their optimal debt levels, operate at higher efficiency with access to cheaper capital, and help the manager maximize firm value. This could help them in decision making processes of financing their business through receiving a better understanding of how the ESG rating affects the capital structure. This knowledge would allow management to better understand how the investments necessary in acquiring the ESG rating affect firm value as well as how they affect the dynamics of financing the firm. This is a deductive and quantitative research based on secondary data, gathered using Thomson Reuters (Eikon) database. Furthermore, this research is a cross-sectional study analysing companies in year 2019. No clear relationship between the two concepts has been found, arriving at the conclusion that the optimal capital structure is not influenced by sustainability initiatives. However, sustainability initiatives should always be encouraged since these generate other beneficial effects. Finally, this research contributes to the current field of knowledge on the topic through analysing the results using the Trade-off Theory, Pecking Order Theory, Agency Theory, Legitimacy Theory and Stakeholder Theory. The results are somewhat aligned with the Trade-off Theory of capital structure and the Pecking Order Theory as well as other more traditional financial theories. One can conclude that sustainability performance is not of importance when it comes to the firm's ability to raise capital or the firm’s capital structure. This tells us that there is still a long way to go and that action needs to be taken before sustainability becomes an essential and well-integrated factor considered in investment decisions. The results may be undesirable, but they also give a fair picture of the financial sector’s priorities as of now and highlight the need for sustainable objectives to align with financial profitability.

A company's need for an effective and suitable corporate strategy is higher than ever due tofierce and increasing competition in the current business landscape. In order for companies tofinance their chosen corporate strategy, as for instance conduct investments for growth, theyneed proper funding. Moreover, the capital structure defines and outlines a company’s availablemix of debt and equity. Financial theories and studies further conclude that it is paramount forcompanies to understand the relationship between the corporate strategy and the capital structurein order to remain competitive. However, the current amount of empirical studies that have beenconducted in this area is very limited. Therefore, this study has analysed and examined therelationship between the corporate strategy and the capital structure for small and medium-sizedenterprises (SMEs) in the Swedish manufacturing industry. Indeed, the purpose of the study is toexamine this relationship. The study has been executed by conducting five case studies where five different SMEs in theSwedish manufacturing industry have been analysed. The companies represent both familyownership as well as ownerships via external investors. The five case studies consisted of semistructuredinterviews with the CEO of each firm. A questionnaire was also provided to the fiverespondents, which enhanced the possibility to benchmark the results from the companies. The results of the study indicate that the relationship between the corporate strategy and thecapital structure differs depending on a company’s type of ownership. In conclusion, forexternally owned companies (e.g. owned by private equity companies), the corporate strategytends to drive the choice of capital structure. On the other hand, for companies owned by thefounding families, the relationship seems to be inverted where the capital structure rather drivesthe choice of corporate strategy. / Ett företags behov av en effektiv och passande företagsstrategi är högre än någonsin på grund avhård och ökande konkurrens på den nuvarande marknaden. För att ett företag skall kunnafinansiera sin valda företagsstrategi, som exempelvis att genomföra investeringar för tillväxt,krävs det en väl avvägd finansiering. Vidare definierar och beskriver kapitalstrukturen ettföretags tillgänglighet gällande dess mix av skulder och eget kapital. Samtidigt visar finansiellteori och studier på området att det är av största vikt för företag att de förstår sambandet mellandess företagsstrategi och kapitalstruktur för att de skall kunna förbli konkurrenskraftiga. Dock ärantalet studier som är gjorda på området mycket begränsade. Således har denna studie analyseratoch undersökt sambandet mellan företagsstrategin och kapitalstrukturen för små och medelstoraföretag (SMEs) inom den svenska tillverkningsindustrin. Studien har utförts genom att genomföra fem fallstudier där fem olika små och medelstoraföretag inom den svenska tillverkningsindustrin har analyserats. Företagen representerar bådefamiljeägda företag samt företag ägda av externa investerare. De fem fallstudierna bestod avsemistrukturerade intervjuer med VDn för respektive bolag. Ett frågeformulär distribueradesockså till de fem respondenterna för att kunna möjliggöra en jämförelse av resultaten från bolagen. Resultaten av studien indikerar att sambandet mellan företagsstrategin och kapitalstrukturenvarierar beroende på typ av ägarskap av ett bolag. Sammanfattningsvis så tenderar valet avföretagsstrategi att driva valet av kapitalstruktur för bolag ägda av externa investerare(exempelvis bolag ägda av private equity-företag). Å andra sidan tenderar förhållandet snararevara inverterat för företag ägda av sina grundarfamiljer, där kapitalstrukturen snarare driver valetav företagsstrategi.

This study investigates the effect of monetary policy, focusing on repo rate and the expansion of QE programs, on Mergers and Acquisitions activity in publicly listed companies on the Swedish Stock Exchange. The study also investigates whether there are significant relationships between companies’ acquisition activity, their solvency or liquidity ratios. Additionally, the observed firms are categorized into industries to enable examination of differences between industries. The thesis aims at expanding the knowledge of determinant factors in explaining M&A activity on the Swedish market. To adequately determine the influencing factors on activity, 27 years of data was collected on acquiring Swedish firms from the Eikon database. In addition, data for the calculations of solvency and liquidity ratios were gathered from the same database. Data for the monetary policy variables were gathered from the Swedish Central Bank. A deductive quantitative method was used to analyze the various relationships between the studied variables. The study concluded significant correlation between monetary policy and M&A activity, company solvency and M&A activity as well as corporate liquidity and M&A activity. The correlation was negative in all cases except for quantitative easing which opens up for an interesting discussion. Observed industries gave a mixed result in terms of significant relationships but the result also indicate that pro-cyclical industries tend to be more affected by monetary policy than non-cyclicals. All of the above-mentioned relationships are further discussed from the perspective of various theories that both agree and disagree with the findings of this study. The authors believe that these results will give stakeholders a more in-depth knowledge and understanding of M&A activity and M&As in general. This study contributes knowledge to enable more sustainable business administration and management of companies.

This thesis explores if Scandinavian publicly listed firms’ financial leverage was affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. Whilst theory suggests that financial leverage is positively affected by uncertainty and reduced profitability, previous empirical research finds weak evidence of listed firms reducing financial leverage during crises. We follow the work by Demirgüç-Kunt, Martinez Peria and Tressel (2020) and D’Amato (2020) and run fixed effect panel data regression analyses. Our results are in line with the previous empirical studies regarding the financial crisis as we do not find significant change in means in financial leverage between the pre-pandemic period and the pandemic for listed firms. For our complete sample, we find that the pandemic had no significant impact on total debt to total assets but a significant impact on long-term debt to total assets. However, the results are varying amongst the countries. Therefore, further research is advised. We also find that, increases in growth opportunities, and profitability affect financial leverage negatively, whilst asset structure and firm size have positive effects on financial leverage. The results for liquidity are mixed. Overall, the findings are in line with previous research.

Building new homes and oÿces are vital for the well-being in a country from both an economic sense and from a viewpoint that a growing population needs more housing. For construction companies to be able to meet their objectives, an important issue is the capital structure choice. The discussion of capital structure and company value became one of the most contentious areas in finance in the decades following the publication of the famous paper by Modigliani and Miller. Since then, there has been a lot of work exploring the optimal capital structure for firms in di˙erent situations, however the work has been rather limited in Sweden. This study tested the pecking order theory of capital structure on publicly traded Swedish construction firms between 1995 to 2019. The study had a focus on how well the pecking order theory can account for financial decisions made by Swedish construction firms through a series of tests. The purpose is to understand what factors are the most important, with regards to the capital structure, for listed firms in the Swedish construction industry. The result of the tests showed that the pecking order theory failed to outperform the conventional leverage model. Therefore, the study was unsuccessful in finding support for the hypothesis that the pecking order theory would be the dominant financial theory to explain capital structure decisions. / Att bygga nya bostäder och kontor är avgörande för välfärden i ett land ur både ekonomisk mening och ur en synvinkel att en växande befolkning behöver fler bostäder. För att byggföretag ska kunna nå sina mål är valet av kapitalstruktur en viktig fråga. Diskussionen om kapitalstruktur och företagsvärde blev ett av de mest debatterade områdena inom finansiell ekonomi under årtiondena efter den berömda publiceringen av Modigliani och Miller. Sedan dess har det gjorts mycket arbete med att utforska den optimala kapitalstrukturen för företag i olika situationer, däremot är forskningen något begränsat i Sverige. Denna studie testade pecking order teorin om kapitalstruktur hos börsnoterade svenska byggföretag mellan 1995 och 2019. Studien hade ett fokus på hur väl pecking order teorin kan förklara ekonomiska beslut som fattats av svenska byggföretag genom en serie av tester. Syftet är att förstå vilka faktorer som är de viktigaste med avseende på kapitalstrukturen för börsnoterade företag i den svenska byggbranschen. Resultatet av testerna visade att pecking order teorin inte överträ˙ade den konventionella modellen av finansiell hävstång. Därmed hittades inte stöd för hypotesen att pecking order teorin skulle vara den dominerande finansiella teorin för att förklara beslut av kapitalstruktur.

Background: SME constitutes to 99,9% of business in Sweden. A central aspect of running a business is to grow, Previous research shows that access to external funds is a limitation for SMEs ability to create growth and therefore capital structure can vary between companies.  Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the financial sources that are of greatest significance for SMEs with positive and negative growth. The purpose is also to investigate whether there are micro and macroeconomic factors that affect the growth of Swedish SMEs. Method: This study has been conducted using a quantitative approach and a random sample of 121 SME from all of Sweden’s stock markets. The research period lasted for 6 years, from 2017 to 2022. In operationalizing the variables, previous research was used, were as the dependent variable was growth in net sales. Multiple regression analysis has been conducted to see if any independent variables had any effect on the growth in net sales.  Results: The result from this study indicates that the percentage of debt and equity are almost the same for SME:s with positive and negative growth. Similar to previous studies this result indicates that the internal cashflow is not enough to finance growth. External finance is therefore crucial to create growth. The external finance with the biggest positive impact on SME:s with positive growth are equity and long-term debt. The external finance with the biggest positive impact on SME:s with negative growth is short-term debt. The conclusion from this study is that the internal cashflow has the biggest impact in determining whether the external finance have a positive or negative impact on net revenue.  This study also found that micro-economic factors affect SME:s. The present study found that younger SME:s has a higher growth rate. Size has a positive effect on SME:s. Out of the macro-economic factors that were used in the study, only business cycle had a significant effect on growth rate.  The result from this study found that pecking order theory is better to describe the capital structure of SME than trade off theory, but both theories are relevant in explaining SMEs options of financial sources. / Bakgrund: Små- och medelstora företag (SME) utgör 99,9% av företagen i Sverige. En central del för företag är att växa. Tidigare forskning visar att tillgången till externt kapital är en begränsande faktor för SMEs tillväxt. Det kan därför variera hur företag strukturerar sin finansiering. Syfte: Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka vilka finansieringskällor som är av störst betydelse för SME med positiv- och negativ tillväxt. Syftet är också att undersöka om det finns mikro- och makroekonomiska faktorer som påverkar tillväxten i svenska SME. Metod: Studien har genomförts med ett kvantitativt angreppssätt. Urvalet har skett slumpmässigt, där det slutgiltiga urvalet av populationen bestod av 121 SME från samtliga svenska börser. Undersökningsperioden sträcker sig över 6 år från 2017 till 2022. I operationaliseringen av variablerna har forskarna använt sig av tidigare forskning där den beroende variabeln är nettoomsättningstillväxt. Flertalet regressionsanalyser har genomförts för att kontrollera de oberoende variablernas påverkan på nettoomsättningstillväxt. Resultat: Resultatet från studien visar att andelen skulder och eget kapital för de båda undersökningsgrupperna är relativt lika. Likt tidigare studier indikerar resultatet på att det interna kassaflödet inte räcker för att finansiera tillväxt. Extern finansiering blir därför avgörande för att skapa tillväxt. För företag med positiv tillväxt är de externa finansieringskällorna med störst positiv betydelse eget kapital och långfristiga skulder. För företag med negativ tillväxt är kortfristiga skulder den externa finansieringskällan med störst positiv betydelse. Slutsatsen är att det interna kassaflödet är av störst betydelse för huruvida externa finansieringskällor har en positiv eller negativ påverkan på nettoomsättningstillväxt. Denna studie fann att mikroekonomiska faktorer påverkar SME. Den aktuella studien fann att yngre SME har högre tillväxt. Storleken påverkar tillväxten positivt. Av de makroekonomiska faktorerna som användes i studien är det enbart konjunktur som är signifikant. Resultatet från studien indikerar på att pecking order-teorin bättre kan tolka resultatet än trade off-teorin, men det går att argumentera för att båda teorierna är relevanta för att förklara SMEs finansieringskällor.