Global ETD Search

41	Políticas publicas do esporte no Brasil: razões para o predomínio do alto rendimento Bueno, Luciano 19 May 2008 (has links) Made available in DSpace on 2010-04-20T20:49:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 72040100444.pdf.jpg: 10101 bytes, checksum: 95b84ee9ccb0a675c6ce1345668f4cbe (MD5) 72040100444.pdf: 2731190 bytes, checksum: 92fa8095cd2a5b53387bdc742cde8ad6 (MD5) 72040100444.pdf.txt: 681987 bytes, checksum: 3bebbad2c37f10f53288bf1d8927b325 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-05-19T00:00:00Z / Esta tese tem por tema o estudo da evolução da Política Pública do Esporte no Brasil. Seu objeto de estudo é o predomínio do esporte de alto rendimento. Para tanto, define as três categorias de manifestação esportiva com as quais trabalha: esporte de alto rendimento, esporte educacional e esporte participativo. Igualmente apresenta a estrutura teórica a ser utilizada, a Advocacy Coalition Framework – ACF, que se utiliza de estrutura de crenças e valores formatada pelo autor para o estudo do campo esportivo, tratado pela ACF com um subsistema ou área específica de política publica. Procurando melhor embasar o estudo, a tese resgata os principais conceitos históricos e sociológicos relacionados ao campo do esporte e reforça a interação deste com os aspectos sociais, econômicos e políticos. Em seguida, aborda a gênese do esporte e sua vinda ao Brasil, no início do século passado, passando pela criação das entidades desportivas e apresentando as razões de seus conflitos de interesses. Ainda nesta parte, aborda a discussão sobre os valores e contra valores que permearam a discussão entre intelectuais a favor e contra o desenvolvimento do esporte. No período do Estado Novo a tese discute as razões que levaram o Estado a intervir no setor esportivo e a estruturá-lo institucionalmente com o Decreto Lei 3.199, de 1941. Com já apontado por outros autores, este decreto representou acentuada ação do Estado em favor do esporte de alto rendimento, fortalecendo propositadamente sua coalizão de atore, aqui chamada de pró-EAR, bem como reflete seu desejo de implementar valores higienistas e eugenistas que permeavam a sociedade intelectualizada de então. A tese aborda o caráter autoritário e corporativista do Decreto e como estas características foram usadas no período populistas para desenvolver bases clientelistas na estrutura formal do esporte. Na fase do regime militar, a tese discute o projeto de transformar o Brasil em uma potência olímpica nos moldes do futebol e como tal ideal determinou ação deliberada de incorporação do setor esportivo educacional aos princípios e valores do esporte de alto rendimento, o denominado como modelo piramidal. O estudo contempla a reação de parte da comunidade acadêmica e da prática educacional da área esportiva e também o surgimento do movimento do esporte para todos. O que é assumido pela tese como o início da coalizão contrária ao alto rendimento, aqui chamada de pró-EPE (esporte participativo e educacional). Na seqüência, analisa o importante período da constitucionalização do esporte, que implicou no embate entre as duas coalizões dentro do processo constituinte, quando, a despeito da supremacia da pró-EAR, redundou em importantes conquistas para a pró-EPE ao se estabelecer o esporte como um direito social e ao se dar prioridade ao esporte educacional na ação do Estado. Ainda como parte do processo de liberalização do esporte analisa o papel da Lei Zico na reestruturação do subsistema esportivo. No período mais recente a tese se concentra, por um lado, na evolução institucional do esporte dentro de Estado, significando a passagem do nível de secretaria para o de ministério. Por outro lado, o esforço legislativo para aprimorar a legislação, acentuadamente a favor da modernização do futebol e do esporte de alto rendimento. É também o período em que a tese faz sua real contribuição ao abordar a distribuição desproporcional de recursos público e a representação no órgão de aconselhamento nacional do esporte entre as três categorias de manifestação esportiva. Em função das evidências apresentadas, a tese conclui pelo fortalecimento da coalizão pró-EAR e seu o efeito no aumento do predomínio do alto rendimento. Políticas públicas Políticas do esporte Educação Física Programas de esporte Ministério do Esporte Esporte para Todos Legislação Esportiva Esporte de Alto Rendimento Esporte Advocacy coalition framework Administração pública Brasil. Ministério do Esporte Esportes e Estado - Brasil Esportes - Brasil - Legislação
42	Analýza pozice České republiky vůči revizi směrnice 96/71/ES o vysílání pracovníků v rámci poskytování služeb / Analysis of the Position of the Czech Republic Concerning the Revision of Posted Workers Directive 1996/71/EC Bein, Nikola January 2020 (has links) This thesis focuses on the position of the Czech Republic towards the proposal of the revision of the Posting of Workers Directive, which was introduced by the European Commission in March 2016. Although the Czech Republic's statement was negative in March 2016, the Czech position supported the proposal during final voting in the Council in June 2018. The thesis aims at identifying causes of the position change using the Advocacy Coalition Framework and at confirming the main proposition, that change of the position may be explained by an existence of advocacy coalitions which tried to enforce their beliefs. The thesis concludes that the main proposition may be confirmed only partially. Although the existence of two advocacy coalitions with opposing beliefs was identified, it is not possible to claim absolutely that this is the true reason of the change. Two hypothesis were defined. First one is based on existence of the external sources whose presesnce was confirmed, as well as their dominant influence on the change. Therefore, this hypothesis was confirmed. The second hypothesis was disproved. The second coalition was much weaker and rather passive than the first one, so there was no need to overcome the "hurting stalemate" situation at the national level. The change was not absolute. It should...
43	FÖRESTÄLLNINGAR OCH INTRESSEN : En fallstudie utifrån Advocacy Coalition Framework av en lokal policyprocess om expropriation Blomqvist, Fredrik January 2016 (has links) This paper examines the viability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework(ACF) by applying it in a single case study. The aim is to advance the framework’s theoretical understanding of the policy process and its usefulness for analyzing local policy contexts. The case addressed is a long-spun policy conflict regarding the use of compulsory acquisition of real estate by a Swedish municipality for the sake of local business development. Analyzed data consisted of the municipality diary on the issue, correspondence between actors, public statements, official and internal documents and interviews with actors and non-actors. The ACF is a good starting point for understanding this local policy process, largely because of the great flexibility of its concepts. However, its basic assumptions on beliefs cannot fully explain observed events. Relating to this, the paper has five main findings. First, although beliefs play an important role in forming policy action, so does interests. Second, a conjunction of beliefs and self-interest is an important condition for some actors’ actions. Third, coalition formation is not dependent on similarity of beliefs but on similarity of policy objectives. Fourth, policy objectives are resultant of beliefs for some actors, of self-interest for others and for yet others the result of both. Therefore, actors in coalition act to achieve the same policy objectives but not necessarily for the same reasons. Fifth, one non-actor refrained from policy action in spite of strong policy core beliefs due to the policy process not being a zero sum game for this non-actor. This paper supports recent studies proposing the incorporation of interests into the ACF. For further development of the ACF the paper suggests further research to answer two generic questions: What is the relationship betweeninterests and beliefs? Are potential actors more likely to take policy action inzero sum game policy processes? For the ACF to cope with certain conditionsin local contexts the paper suggest further research into the question: Is the level of abstraction of policy issues key in understanding the involvement of legal and natural persons and their basis for policy action? policy process policyprocess advocacy coalition framework advocacy coalition framework acf beliefs interests beliefs and interests interests and beliefs local policy municipality sweden scandinavia compulsory acquisition of real estate rule of law business trade industry business development coalition formation action policy action policy objectives objectives zero sum game policy abstraction realism constructivism policy process policyprocess advocacy coalition framework advocacy coalition framework acf påverkan koalition föreställningar intressen värderingar beliefs interests sverige realism constructivism lokal politik local policy kommunpolitik kommun näringsliv expropriation rättssäkerhet rättsstat fastighet plan och bygglagen näringslivsutveckling näringsliv koalitionsformering policyagerande action policymål objectives nollsummespel zero sum game policyabstraktion policyabstraction
44	A produção do cidadão: políticas públicas para a primeira infância no Brasil / The making of the citizen: early childhood public policy in Brazil Silva, David Moisés Felismino da 13 August 2018 (has links) Esta dissertação apresenta uma investigação sobre atores envolvidos na produção de políticas públicas para a primeira infância no Brasil. Nela buscou-se identificar e compreender suas ideias, suas formas de organização, articulação, negociação e tomada de decisão, explicando o predomínio da conciliação e do consenso entre eles. A pesquisa teve também o propósito de testar a viabilidade do uso da Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) para o estudo daqueles atores e seu subsistema de políticas, verificando as possibilidades e limitações dessa estrutura teórico-conceitual. Foi feito um estudo de caso sobre a comissão especial da Câmara dos Deputados que aprovou em 2014 o Projeto de Lei nº 6998\\2013, levando à criação do Marco Legal da Primeira Infância (MLPI), a Lei nº 13257 de 8\\3\\2016. Foram analisados os registros em texto e áudio das reuniões e audiências da comissão. A análise de argumentos e posições dos atores foi fundamentada na abordagem conceitual de Michael Freeden e na sua morfologia das famílias ideológicas, em associação com a caracterização das ideologias por Andrew Vincent. Foram identificados conceitos e princípios característicos de diversas famílias ideológicas, revelando-se bases para diferentes coalizões. As constatações da análise foram comparadas com dados fornecidos por atores em entrevistas semiestruturadas. Concluiu-se que houve um empenho comum das coalizões para a construção de um consenso prático que garantisse a aprovação do MLPI, pois esta beneficiaria a todos os atores. O teste de uso da ACF indicou que esta é uma abordagem apropriada para o estudo daquele subsistema de políticas, embora tenha apresentado duas limitações graves: não foi capaz de explicar a ação individual contraditória nem o apoio de todas as coalizões à criação do MLPI. Nesses dois pontos, foi necessário recorrer à abordagem de James March sobre as lógicas da adequação e da consequência. Sendo, tal como a ACF, uma abordagem ideacional, esse sistema de lógicas de ação mostrou-se um complemento viável e eficiente. / This dissertation presents an investigation on individuals and groups devoted to design public policies for early childhood in Brazil. It sought to understand their ideas, the ways they coordinate and compete, their decision-making process, as well as to explain the dominance of consensus among them. This work also aimed to test the feasibility of using Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) as theoretical background for the research on those actors and their policy subsystem. A case study was made of the special committee in the Câmara dos Deputados where representatives passed in 2014 the Bill nº 6998\\2013, leading to the creation of a national legal framework for early childhood (MLPI), by Law nº 13257 of 3\\8th\\2016. Records (text and audio) of meetings and hearings held by the commitee were analyzed. The analysis of arguments and positions expressed by actors was based on Michael Freedens conceptual approach of ideologies and his morphology of ideological families, in association with Andrew Vincents characterization of ideologies. Concepts and principles related to various ideologies were identified, pointing out conditions for different coalitions to be formed. The findings of analysis were compared with information provided by actors in semi-structured interviews. It was concluded that there was a common commitment of coalitions to build a practical consensus that would assure the approval of MLPI, as this would benefit all stakeholders. The feasibility test of ACF suggested that this is a suitable approach to the research on that policy subsystem, although it has presented two serious limitations: it was not able to explain the contradictory individual action nor the commitment of all coalitions to the creation of MLPI. To deal with these topics, it was necessary to resort to James Marchs approach on the logics of appopriateness and consequences. Being as much an ideational approach as the ACF, this logic of action system proved to be a viable and efficient complement. Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) Coalizões de defesa Consensus building Construção de consenso Early childhood Famílias ideológicas Ideological families Logic of appropriateness Logic of consequences Lógica da adequação Lógica da consequência Morfologia das ideologias Morphology of ideologies Policymaking Policymaking Políticas públicas Primeira infância Public policy
45	Η θεσμοθέτηση ενός συστήματος διασφάλισης ποιότητας στο ελληνικό πανεπιστήμιο: συγκρότηση δικτύων υπεράσπισης αντιλήψεων και αξιών στο υποσύστημα πολιτικής του πανεπιστημίου / The establishment of a quality assurance system in Greek university: the formation of advocacy coalition networks in the subsystem of university Καβασακάλης, Άγγελος 30 May 2012 (has links) Η παρούσα διδακτορική διατριβή έχει ως στόχο τη συνεισφορά στην ανάλυση και ερμηνεία της έντασης και διαμάχης κατά τη διάρκεια παραγωγής και εφαρμογής προγραμμάτων πολιτικής σχετικών με τη διασφάλιση της ποιότητας στο ελληνικό πανεπιστήμιο. Η βασική θεώρηση της εργασίας είναι ότι δρώντες (συλλογικοί και μεμονωμένοι) σχηματίζουν δίκτυα πολιτικής τα οποία συνασπίζονται και συγκρούονται με άλλους αντίστοιχους συνασπισμούς δικτύων έχοντας ως διακύβευμα την προώθηση και εφαρμογή πολιτικών σχετικά με το πανεπιστήμιο. Από την ανάλυση της ελληνικής περίπτωσης διαφαίνεται ότι κάθε προσπάθεια προώθησης ενός θεσμοποιημένου συστήματος διασφάλισης της ποιότητας στα ελληνικά πανεπιστήμια είχε ως αποτέλεσμα την αύξηση της έντασης στο χώρο του πανεπιστημίου. Οι ελληνικές κυβερνήσεις εντατικοποίησαν τις προσπάθειές τους για την ψήφιση και εφαρμογή ενός σχετικού νόμου, καθώς το θέμα της διασφάλισης της ποιότητας είχε τεθεί ως κεντρικό, ήδη από το 1998, μέσω των ευρωπαϊκών εκπαιδευτικών πολιτικών στην ανώτατη εκπαίδευση. Η παραγωγή, η επεξεργασία και η ερμηνεία των ερευνητικών δεδομένων οδήγησε επιγραμματικά στα κεντρικά ευρήματα της παρούσης διδακτορικής διατριβής: Η πρώτη αλλαγή πολιτικής πραγματοποιείται το 2005 με την παραγωγή συγκεκριμένου προγράμματος πολιτικής για τη διασφάλιση της ποιότητας στο ελληνικό πανεπιστήμιο (Ν.3374/2005). Η αλλαγή αυτή πραγματοποιείται κυρίως εξαιτίας των εξωτερικών συνθηκών του υποσυστήματος. Τόσο πριν από την παραγωγή του προγράμματος όσο και αμέσως μετά δημιουργούνται δύο ισχυροί αντιτιθέμενοι συνασπισμοί δικτύων με συγκρίσιμους πόρους. Κατά τη διάρκεια της αρχικής περιόδου εφαρμογής του προγράμματος, οι εξελίξεις εντός του υποσυστήματος πολιτικής του ελληνικού πανεπιστημίου προκαλούν αλλαγές στους πόρους των δύο συνασπισμών και στη θέση ισορροπίας της ισχύος. Ο συνασπισμός δικτύων «Εναντίον» του προγράμματος πολιτικής φαίνεται να αποδυναμώνεται διαρκώς με αποτέλεσμα να μην μπορεί να διατηρήσει με αποτελεσματικό τρόπο την ένταση σε υψηλά επίπεδα. Ο δε συνασπισμός «Υπέρ» φαίνεται να ισχυροποιείται αρκετά έναντι του αντιτιθέμενου συνασπισμού, με αποτέλεσμα να μπορεί να μεταβάλλει τις μεταξύ τους ισορροπίες ώστε να δημιουργούνται σαφώς ευνοϊκότερες συνθήκες για την υλοποίηση του προγράμματος, ιδιαίτερα από το 2008 και μετά. Οι παραπάνω αλλαγές πολιτικής, αν και σημαντικές, δεν συνοδεύονται από παράλληλη παραγωγή γνώσης εξαιτίας πολιτικής εμπειρίας τόσο εντός όσο και μεταξύ των αντιμαχόμενων συνασπισμών δικτύων. Αυτό συμβαίνει παρά το γεγονός ότι η πολιτική εμπειρία δεν υπήρξε αμελητέα καθώς η σύγκρουση και η αντιπαράθεση για το συγκεκριμένο ζήτημα πολιτικής ήταν διαρκώς παρούσα για μία δεκαετία περίπου. / The present thesis aims to the contribution in analysis and interpretation of intensity and conflict during the establishment and implementation of policy programs relative with Quality Assurance in Greek Universities. The basic view of this thesis is that actors form policy networks which create advocacy coalitions and collide with other corresponding network coalitions having at risk the establishment and implementation of policies programs for universities. It seems that in Greece whenever an effort for the establishment of institutionalized quality assurance system takes place the result is the presence of intensity and conflict. However, European educational policies in higher education since 1998 have placed quality assurance as one of the main action lines, fact that results the intensifying of efforts of Greek governments for the voting and implementation of a relative law. The production, the analysis and finally the interpretation of research data led succinctly to the central findings of the present thesis: In 2005 due to external to the policy sub-system events and parameters a first policy change takes place with the establishment of a policy program of quality assurance in universities (Law 3374/2005). So much before the establishment of the policy program what immediately afterwards, at the first period of implementation, two powerful conflicting advocacy coalition networks with comparable resources are created. During the initial period of the policy program implementation developments internal to the policy sub-system of Greek university cause changes in the allocation of resources in the two coalition networks. The advocacy coalition network “Against” the policy program appears to be permanently undermined. As a result this coalition finds difficulties on maintaining with effective way the intensity in high levels. The advocacy coalition network “In favour” to the policy program appears to be strengthened enough against the conflicting coalition. Therefore, this coalition is able to alter the balance point between the two advocacy coalitions and to create more favourable conditions for the implementation of the policy program particularly from 2008 and afterwards. These policy changes, no matter how important they are, they are not accompanied by production of “policy oriented learning” inside or across the conflicting advocacy coalitions. Policy oriented learning does not take place despite the fact that the policy experience of all actors and networks on this specific policy theme was not negligible since the conflict and the juxtaposition on the specific policy issue was continuously present for roughly a decade. Διασφάλιση ποιότητας 378.1 Education policy European education policies Higher education policies Quality assurance Greek university Advocacy coalition framework Policy sub-system of Greek University
46	政府採購政策變遷之研究– 以臺北市政府聯合採購發包中心設置為例 / A Study on the Policy Change of Government Procurement – Case Study of Contract Centers Mechanism of Taipei City Government 呂蕙蕙, Lu, Hui Hui Unknown Date (has links) 有關政府採購研究，現行大部分關注在法律層面、制度層面。本研究擬從政策變遷與宏觀角度切入，就發包中心設置過程因果關係，發現決策者信念、政策中間人、聯盟運作等對政策影響。本文擬透過Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith 所建構政策倡議聯盟架構（Policy Advocacy Coalition Framework，[PACF ]），從不同面相研究觀察，以宏觀之政策面，研究分析市府發包中心重新設置之動態過程。本研究採文獻分析法、深入訪談及焦點團體訪談法，分析探討1995至2015年臺北市政府聯合採購發包中心設置之政策變遷過程。藉由分析架構內外在系統的影響因素，探討執政輪替與決策者的信念是否為影響政策變遷主要因素。經研究發現：第一，市府倡議聯盟間（發包中心與洽辦單位、集中採購與分散採購）透過政策導向的學習，跨越聯盟達成共識。第二，避免陳水扁時代採購案件延宕，改以折衷版集中採購。第三，柯文哲市長主張集中採購，設置發包中心政策是其競選政策白皮書。第四，市府發包中心設置政策變遷主因，決策者信念與執政輪替。 / With regard to government procurement research, most of them focus on the legal and institutional aspects. This study intends to proceed from the perspective of policy changes and macroeconomics. It will investigate the cause-and-effect relationship of the setup process of the contract issuing center, and discover the impact of decision makers' beliefs, policy middlemen, and alliance operations on the policy. Using the policy advocacy coalition framework (PACF) constructed by Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith , we observe and analyze the dynamic process of the resetting of the city's outsourcing centers. This study used document analysis, in-depth interviews, and focus group interviews to analyze and explore the process of policy changes at the Joint Purchasing and Contracting Center of the Taipei City Government from 1995 to 2015. By analyzing the influencing factors of the internal and external systems of the architecture, it is discussed whether the alternation of governance rotation and decision makers' beliefs are the main factors affecting policy changes. The study found that: First, the city’s initiative among the alliances (contracting centers and contact agencies, centralized procurement and decentralized procurement) through policy-oriented learning, reached consensus across the alliance. Second, to avoid delays in Chen Shui-bian’s era of procurement cases , it used eclectic centralized procurement. Thirdly, Mayor Ko Wen-je advocated centralized procurement and set up a contract center policy as a white paper on his election policy. Fourth, the main reasons for the policy changes in the city's outsourcing centers are decision makers' beliefs and governance rotation. 臺北市政府聯合採購發包中心政策變遷政策倡議聯盟架構決策者信念政策中間人 Policy changes Policy advocacy coalition framework Decision makers' beliefs Policy middleman
47	A produção do cidadão: políticas públicas para a primeira infância no Brasil / The making of the citizen: early childhood public policy in Brazil David Moisés Felismino da Silva 13 August 2018 (has links) Esta dissertação apresenta uma investigação sobre atores envolvidos na produção de políticas públicas para a primeira infância no Brasil. Nela buscou-se identificar e compreender suas ideias, suas formas de organização, articulação, negociação e tomada de decisão, explicando o predomínio da conciliação e do consenso entre eles. A pesquisa teve também o propósito de testar a viabilidade do uso da Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) para o estudo daqueles atores e seu subsistema de políticas, verificando as possibilidades e limitações dessa estrutura teórico-conceitual. Foi feito um estudo de caso sobre a comissão especial da Câmara dos Deputados que aprovou em 2014 o Projeto de Lei nº 6998\\2013, levando à criação do Marco Legal da Primeira Infância (MLPI), a Lei nº 13257 de 8\\3\\2016. Foram analisados os registros em texto e áudio das reuniões e audiências da comissão. A análise de argumentos e posições dos atores foi fundamentada na abordagem conceitual de Michael Freeden e na sua morfologia das famílias ideológicas, em associação com a caracterização das ideologias por Andrew Vincent. Foram identificados conceitos e princípios característicos de diversas famílias ideológicas, revelando-se bases para diferentes coalizões. As constatações da análise foram comparadas com dados fornecidos por atores em entrevistas semiestruturadas. Concluiu-se que houve um empenho comum das coalizões para a construção de um consenso prático que garantisse a aprovação do MLPI, pois esta beneficiaria a todos os atores. O teste de uso da ACF indicou que esta é uma abordagem apropriada para o estudo daquele subsistema de políticas, embora tenha apresentado duas limitações graves: não foi capaz de explicar a ação individual contraditória nem o apoio de todas as coalizões à criação do MLPI. Nesses dois pontos, foi necessário recorrer à abordagem de James March sobre as lógicas da adequação e da consequência. Sendo, tal como a ACF, uma abordagem ideacional, esse sistema de lógicas de ação mostrou-se um complemento viável e eficiente. / This dissertation presents an investigation on individuals and groups devoted to design public policies for early childhood in Brazil. It sought to understand their ideas, the ways they coordinate and compete, their decision-making process, as well as to explain the dominance of consensus among them. This work also aimed to test the feasibility of using Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) as theoretical background for the research on those actors and their policy subsystem. A case study was made of the special committee in the Câmara dos Deputados where representatives passed in 2014 the Bill nº 6998\\2013, leading to the creation of a national legal framework for early childhood (MLPI), by Law nº 13257 of 3\\8th\\2016. Records (text and audio) of meetings and hearings held by the commitee were analyzed. The analysis of arguments and positions expressed by actors was based on Michael Freedens conceptual approach of ideologies and his morphology of ideological families, in association with Andrew Vincents characterization of ideologies. Concepts and principles related to various ideologies were identified, pointing out conditions for different coalitions to be formed. The findings of analysis were compared with information provided by actors in semi-structured interviews. It was concluded that there was a common commitment of coalitions to build a practical consensus that would assure the approval of MLPI, as this would benefit all stakeholders. The feasibility test of ACF suggested that this is a suitable approach to the research on that policy subsystem, although it has presented two serious limitations: it was not able to explain the contradictory individual action nor the commitment of all coalitions to the creation of MLPI. To deal with these topics, it was necessary to resort to James Marchs approach on the logics of appopriateness and consequences. Being as much an ideational approach as the ACF, this logic of action system proved to be a viable and efficient complement. Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) Coalizões de defesa Construção de consenso Famílias ideológicas Lógica da adequação Lógica da consequência Morfologia das ideologias Policymaking Políticas públicas Primeira infância Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) Consensus building Early childhood Ideological families Logic of appropriateness Logic of consequences Morphology of ideologies Policymaking Public policy
48	Nevládní neziskové organizace jako externí "dodavatelé" sociální politiky ve státech, kde neexistuje vlastní sociální politika / Non-Government Organizations as external "suppliers" of social policy in states where is not social policy of their own Yaklyushyna, Oleksandra January 2020 (has links) The effectiveness of development cooperation is currently widely discussed. Development cooperation has come to be criticized, both in terms of its appropriateness and for failing to address some of the global challenges that affect poorer nations. Respecting the differences of developing countries, therefore, plays an important role. It is a question of whether developed countries are aware of cultural and other differences and are proceeding in their help concerning these differences. The problem that the thesis wants to draw attention to is the functionality of development cooperation, which can be influenced by various actors and their beliefs. The main goal is to try to explain, using the theory named Advocacy Coalition Framework, how the beliefs of actors can affect development cooperation. One of the other partial goals is to find out whether and how advocacy coalitions are formed in the field of development cooperation. The contribution of the work is mainly the critical application of the ACF theory in the field of development cooperation in the environment of the Republic of Kenya, as well as the application of the Q method in the research of the perspectives of selected actors. According to the author, the work can also have other benefits such as providing a new perspective on the issue of...
49	Regularizace nelegální migrace jako proces tvorby veřejných politik / Regularization of Illegal Migration as a Policy-making Process Dumont, Anna January 2012 (has links) 'Regularization of Illegal Migration as a Policy-making Process' deals with the social problem of having a high number of irregular migrants in the Czech Republic and regularization as a tool that could help reduce it. Regularization is seen as a political process theoretically described by using the Advocacy Coalition Framework. This thesis tries to find normative definitions of the two coalitions, which hold different beliefs and two different points of view rather than describe the problem. The work is partly designed as a case study in which the theory is applied to the issue of regularization in part there is also an explanation of regularization as well as the Advocacy Coalition Framework. The thesis defines the two coalitions within the subsystem - the for-regularization and anti-regularization coalitions. Each coalition has its deep core and policy core beliefs that determine the relationship to the topic as well as the relationship between the coalitions themselves. In conclusion, the author summarized the information about the coalitions and their belief in three comparative tables where one can confront their approaches. The last part also contains a chapter on The Changes of Beliefs and Policies, where there is an introduction of two policies: the system of voluntary return and that...

Search results