Submitted by Simone Arantes (sq.chaves@gmail.com) on 2017-01-03T21:30:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_Simone_Quirino.pdf: 3765143 bytes, checksum: bb4a41aaff0508c321ce158dd143ee31 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by ÁUREA CORRÊA DA FONSECA CORRÊA DA FONSECA (aurea.fonseca@fgv.br) on 2017-01-04T14:47:21Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_Simone_Quirino.pdf: 3765143 bytes, checksum: bb4a41aaff0508c321ce158dd143ee31 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-18T11:17:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação_Simone_Quirino.pdf: 3765143 bytes, checksum: bb4a41aaff0508c321ce158dd143ee31 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-11-21 / This study aims to identify the financial instruments used to finance the catastrophic risk’s management existing in the Brazilian National Policy on Protection and Civil Defense (PNPDEC) and relevant additional legislation through comparison of such mechanisms with those adopted by other countries. For this, we considered four international examples of relevant financial strategies, represented by Mexico, Caribbean Countries, Turkey and France, which were analyzed based on their historical, social and economic context, on the causal variables that led governments to their enforcement and on the variables related to its implementation mechanisms. Later, the same variables were applied to the Brazilian case, wherewith identified the current state of national financing structure, and the possible obstacles and opportunities for their development. The results of this study indicate that Brazil uses almost exclusively regular budget transfers and extraordinary credits to promote actions related to prevention, response and disaster recovery having, accordingly, a financial protection structure at a significant disadvantage compared with the international examples. / Este estudo objetiva identificar os instrumentos financeiros utilizados para o financiamento da gestão de riscos catastróficos presentes na Política Nacional de Proteção e Defesa Civil (PNPDEC) brasileira e na legislação complementar pertinente, por meio da comparação de tais mecanismos com aqueles adotados por outros países. Para isso, foram considerados quatro exemplos internacionais de estratégias financeiras relevantes, representados por México, Países Caribenhos, Turquia e França, os quais foram analisados com base em seu contexto histórico, social e econômico, nas variáveis causais que levaram os governos à sua efetivação e nas variáveis relacionadas aos seus respectivos mecanismos de implementação. Posteriormente, as mesmas variáveis foram aplicadas ao caso brasileiro, por meio das quais foi identificado o atual estágio da estrutura de financiamento nacional, além de possíveis entraves e oportunidades ao seu desenvolvimento. Os resultados desse estudo indicam que o Brasil utiliza, de forma praticamente exclusiva, transferências orçamentárias regulares e créditos extraordinários para promoção das ações relacionadas à prevenção, resposta e recuperação de desastres dispondo, nesse sentido, de uma estrutura de proteção financeira consideravelmente defasada, quando comparada aos exemplos internacionais.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-03T15:28:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RafaelaHSR_DISSERT.pdf: 2083489 bytes, checksum: 205ac27477b3c2a065fe9cb369c9200e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-02-28 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / In the work reported here we present theoretical and numerical results about a Risk Model with Interest Rate and Proportional Reinsurance based on the article Inequalities for the ruin probability in a controlled discrete-time risk process by Ros ario Romera and Maikol Diasparra (see [5]). Recursive and integral equations as well as upper bounds for the Ruin Probability are given considering three di erent approaches, namely, classical Lundberg inequality, Inductive approach and Martingale approach. Density estimation techniques (non-parametrics) are used to derive upper bounds for the Ruin Probability and the algorithms used in the simulation are presented / Neste trabalho apresentamos resultados te?ricos e num?ricos referentes a um Modelo de Risco com Taxa de Juros e Resseguro Proporcional baseados no artigo Inequalities for the ruin probability in a controlled discrete-time risk process de Ros?rio Romera e Maikol Diasparra (veja [5]). Equa??es recursivas e integrais para a Probabilidade de Ru?na s?o obtidas bem como cotas superiores para a mesma por diferentes abordagens, a saber, pela cl?ssica desigualdade de Lundberg, pela abordagem Indutiva e pela abordagem Martingale. T?cnicas de estima??o de densidade (n?o-param?tricas) s?o utilizadas para a obten??o das cotas para a Probabilidade de Ru?na e os algoritmos utilizados na simula??o s?o apresentados

The aim of this diploma thesis is to make a model comparability analysis of controlled transactions within the reinsurance of insurers and to recommend appropriate transfer pricing methods based on defined assumptions. The work is divided into three parts. The first part deals with transfer pricing issues, focusing on comparability analysis and recommended transfer pricing methods according to the Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations formulated by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (Guidelines OECD). The second part describes the basic knowledge and routine practice for the area of reinsurance connected to the transfer of insurance risks. The last part combines the first two chapters, i.e. application of transfer pricing methods in the light of the comparability analysis according to the Guidelines OECD for reinsurance of insurers. The application itself is implemented through the model comparability analysis in order to recommend appropriate transfer pricing methods, i.e. in accordance with the arm's length principle.

This thesis is dedicated to searching optimal parameters of reinsurance with a focus of quota-share and stop-loss reinsurance. The optimization is based on minimization of value at risk and conditional value at risk of total costs of the insurer for the recieved risk. It also presents a compound random variable and shows various methods of obtaining its probability distribution, for example ap- proximation by lognormal or gamma mixtures distributions or by Panjer recurive method for continuous severity and numerical method of its solution. At the end of the thesis we can find the calculation of the optimal parameters of reinsurance for a compound random variable based on real data. We use various methods to determine probability distribution and premiums. 1

The main aim of this thesis is a development of ILF curves that can be used in the insurance industry when pricing general third party liability on the Czech market. Based on available data there are first estimated size of loss distribution functions used for following generating process. From generated data the increased limit factors are estimated and with a usage of Riebesell's parameterization ILF curves are derived. A substantial part of the thesis is a compilation of literature and the expansion of the statistical approach for estimating fair ILFs based on these data. Besides, the basis for the curves derivation are chapters describing basic theoretical knowledge in the field of reinsurance - in particular, the description of the basic types of reinsurance contracts, as well as the most common methods of a pricing. There is the whole mechanism of curves derivation described; their own use is then demonstrated with the example based on pseudoreal data.

Probably the most frequently used definition of reinsurance is insurance for insurance companies, by reinsurance the cedant (insurance company) cedes part of the risk to the reinsurer. Reinsurance plays nowadays a crucial role in insurance industry as it does not only reduce the reinsured's exposure, but it can also significantly reduce the required solvency capital. In past few decades various approaches to reinsurance actuarial modelling were published and many actuaries are nowadays just reinsurance specialized. The thesis provides an overview of the actuarial aspects of modelling a non-life per risk and for motor third party liability per event excess of loss reinsurance structure, according to the author's knowledge no study of such wide scope exists and various aspects have to be found in various fragmented articles published worldwide. The thesis is based on recent industry literature describing latest trends and methodologies used, the theory is compared with the praxis as the author has working experience from underwriting at CEE reinsurer and actuarial reinsurance modelling at global reinsurance broker. The sequence of topics which are dealt corresponds to sequence of the steps taken by actuary modelling reinsurance and each step is discussed in detail. Starting with data preparation and besides loss inflation, more individual claims development methods are introduced and own probabilistic model is constructed. Further, burning cost analysis and probabilistic rating focused on heavy tailed distributions are discussed. A special attention is given to exposure rating which is not commonly known discipline among actuaries outside of reinsurance industry and different methodologies for property and casualty exposure modelling are introduced including many best practice suggestions. All main approaches to the reinsurance modelling are also illustrated on either real or realistically looking data, similar to those provided by European insurance companies to their reinsurers during renewal periods.

Legal regulation of activities of insurance intermediaries Main part of this diploma thesis is aimed at the analysis and evaluation of new national regulation of insurance intermediaries included in the Act no. 170/2018 on distribution of insurance and reinsurance which is the result of implementation of Directive 2016/97 on insurance distribution into the national legislation. This thesis is divided into three chapters The first chapter is dedicated to the introduction of insurance industry as its own and specific economic segment. In this chapter I am discussing insurance industry from both historic and contemporary point of view. I try to briefly define insurance and insurance industry both from legal and economic aspects and then describe development of insurance and insurance industry through the history. At the end of this chapter, I discuss different distribution channels in insurance industry as one of those channels are insurance intermediaries. The second chapter starts with summary of historical regulation of insurance intermediaries since the creation of independent Czech Republic to present day. Main part of this chapter is dedicated to the current regulation of insurance intermediaries. At first, I am discussing different categories of insurance intermediaries and then I am describing...

再保險之目的，在於提供保險人保險保障。其方式乃再保險人就原保險人在原保險契約中所負之給付責任，予以部份或全部的補償。再保險契約就再保險人之再保險給付責任所為之約定，最常見者為「同一命運原則」之約定。依「同一命運條款」之字面解釋，此條款係指再保險人須與原保險人「同一命運」，於原保險人對被保險人為保險給付後，補償原保險人因對被保險人為保險給付所生之損害。 依據損害補償原則，須保險人之保險給付在保險契約及再保險契約之承保範圍內，再保險人始負再保險給付之責任。為了避免嚴格依據損害補償原則解釋再保險人之責任，造成保險人無法取得再保險保障之結果，並提高對於保險人之保障，再保險契約雙方乃藉由同一命運條款的相關約定，約定保險人只須證明其已向被保險人為補償給付且其給付係依「誠信」所為，再保險人即須同其命運，向保險人為補償給付。再保險人此一契約義務，乃再保險契約雙方當事人基於契約自由，於再保險契約中特別加入同一命運條款的結果。 保險人之「誠信」乃同一命運原則適用之基石，此為法院所共同肯認。然而，對於同一命運原則於個案中之具體適用，法院之看法似乎並無足夠的一致性。究竟，決定再保險契約雙方當事人權利義務的同一命運原則，法院如何解釋其適用上發生之爭議？又，法院對於抽象的誠信原則如何解釋？在同一命運原則的背景下，再保險人是否可以提出何種抗辯以免除其保險給付責任？最後，是否這些問題的解答可以有某程度的預測可能性，以供日後再保險契約雙方草擬同一命運條款之參考？ 針對保險人對被保險人所應為之補償，再保險人與原保險人可能有不同解釋，前者認為再保險人與保險人同一命運之範圍，應以原保險及再保險約定之範圍為限；後者則認為凡保險人所給付與被保險人者，再保險人皆須與其同一命運，負擔給付責任。縱使再保險契約雙方皆主張其以再保險契約之約定為給付責任範圍之界定基礎，然基於利益彼此對立之立場，雙方對於「契約約定」往往有不同詮釋。再保險契約雙方間之爭議，實務上常見者如，原保險人對被保險人所給付之通融賠款（Ex-gratia payment）、懲罰性賠償（Punitive damages）等，是否屬於再保險人與保險人同一命運之範圍？將此類爭議一般化，須探究者為，同一命運條款何種程度限制了再保險人對原保險人之給付表示異議的權利？ 另外，倘若再保險契約中沒有同一命運條款的約定，是否可認為此條款為再保險契約所「默示」（Implied）？此問題涉及同一命運原則的歷史背景，與再保險市場的運作實務息息相關，對於契約的解釋方法也有重要啟示。 同一命運原則為再保險交易發展史上，最常受到爭議的問題之一。現今之再保險交易環境已然愈趨複雜，不僅是所保危險之價額日趨提高，投入再保險交易之保險人數增加且交易類型複雜化，皆使得再保險交易雙方之風險分配及責任分擔，不再可以全然依賴保險人對於誠信原則之遵守。反之，應同時強調再保險與保險之不同，亦即，前者係由專業之保險人為交易雙方而進行之交易，故再保險人應可依其專業，對所保危險主動向保險人提出詢問，此亦顯示了保險人及再保險人間彼此合作愈趨重要，為再保險人負擔再保險給付責任之正當性基礎。本文嘗試處理以上提出的爭議問題，並對可能之解決提出建議。 / The reinsurance loss settlement clause, which appears in a variety of forms of wordings, historically has been one of the most difficult aspects of reinsurance law and practice. In recent days, more and more litigation has arisen as a result of such clauses. This study centers upon the interesting and oftentimes confusing issue of the scope and effect of such clauses, and how they define both the reinsured’s and the reinsurers’ liability. The purpose of reinsurance is to provide insurance protection by the reinsurer for the reinsured, namely, the insurer. At the beginning of reinsurance history when there were only a small number of insurers operating in the insurance market, insurers were fairly familiar with one another, and that resulted in a minimum of formality in doing business. In terms of reinsurance, reinsurers, when asked to pay by their reinsured, normally did not go out of their way to initiate a de novo review or assessment of the risk insured. The main reasons for such practice were, for one, insurers were so familiar with their business partners that they did not see the need for such re-assessment of the risk, and for another, in the past, the nature of the risks insured was not as complicated as those we are faced with nowadays. With a view to enhancing business efficiency and providing better protection for insurers, the parties that engaged in a reinsurance agreement oftentimes would insert into the agreement a “follow the fortunes” or “follow the settlements” clause. Such clauses bound the reinsurers to follow the fortunes/settlements of their reinsured without the reinsured’s liability having been proved, and restrained the reinsurers from refusing to indemnify the reinsured on the ground that liability did not exist under the original policy, provided that the reinsured had acted in a bona fide and businesslike way. In a word, the existence of the loss settlement clause was a logical consequence of the purpose of reinsurance, and the reinsurers’ obligation under such clauses was conditioned on the reinsured’s good faith. Reinsurance loss settlement clauses have been interpreted by the court rather favorably for the reinsured. Courts would normally find coverage for the reinsured, once they decided that the reinsured had acted in good faith in settling with the insured, even if they held that the reinsured had not been legally liable. This fact highlights the importance of the reinsured’s duty of utmost good faith in reinsurance law and practice. However, what exactly is good faith, and what are the reinsured’s obligations under the good faith requirement? Is there a general rule that the courts have developed to justify their finding of the reinsured’s good faith? If good faith, being abstract in itself and susceptible to courts’ subjective discretion, serves as the “standard” to evaluate or define the liability of the parties to a reinsurance agreement, how does it usually function? Does it at times seem so abstract and variable that the reinsurance agreement parties have a hard time predicting their liability under such a standard? Also, in this study, the questions of the implication of loss settlement clauses and the scope or effect of such clauses are explored. The former question asks, where the reinsurance contracts do not contain any “follow the fortunes or settlements” provisions, does the law, custom or practice read into the contracts any obligation on the reinsurer to follow its reinsured’s fortunes or settlements? This question is important in that it deals with the applicability of loss settlement clauses, and thus has a fundamental impact on how reinsurance contracts are interpreted. The latter question aims at clarifying how loss settlement clauses are applied to pertinent areas such as ex gratia payments, punitive damages, reinsurers’ liability caps, payments related to the Wellington Agreement and claims cooperation clauses. Specific examples are given here in order to better understand how loss settlements clauses are put to practical use. Discussion concerned with this question also demonstrates how a loosely worded loss settlement clause could give rise to disputes between the parties. To better define the parties’ rights and obligations under a reinsurance agreement, a more detailed review of how the reinsurance environment as a whole is functioning and how the courts interpret reinsurance loss settlement clauses is required. This issue will be even more worth pondering now that we are seeing a more complex reinsurance market where the parties’ interests are potentially conflicting, which is per se a challenge to the general view that the reinsurers should follow the fortunes or settlements of the reinsured.

O objetivo deste trabalho é examinar o seguro de riscos de engenharia como instrumento para o desenvolvimento. A perspectiva adotada é a da articulação entre direito e economia política: parte-se da ideia de que as categorias jurídicas instauram determinada economia política. Nesse sentido, os contratos de seguro serão entendidos de forma indissociada das operações comunitárias em que se encerram e de sua especial tarefa de reorganização social e econômica. A função social dos contratos de seguro é revelada como conteúdo obrigatório da própria autonomia da vontade atinente a esses contratos. A relação entre seguro e desenvolvimento é ainda mais evidente nos seguros de risco de engenharia, objeto específico deste trabalho. Institucionalizada desde a década de 1930, a função desenvolvimentista desses seguros tem seu declínio a partir dos anos 1970 com nítida agravação no ano de 2007, quando ocorre a abertura do mercado brasileiro de resseguro. Defende-se a tese de que a legislação brasileira sobre seguro de risco de engenharia é inadequada, atuando de forma impeditiva do desenvolvimento nacional. A principal razão para isso está na perda paulatina de conteúdo desses seguros, em parte promovida pelo próprio Estado, capturado pelos interesses dos empresários do setor. A tentativa de anulação da teoria do interesse consagrada não só na longeva praxe dos seguros, como pela doutrina nacional e estrangeira e plasmada no art. 757 do Código Civil, é um dos principais argumentos explorados. Por fim, são apresentados dispositivos do Projeto de Lei do Senado n. 477/2013, que procura trazer para o sistema de direito positivo a primeira lei de contrato de seguro da história brasileira, com o objetivo de reordenar as relações contratuais, eliminando as principais práticas desfuncionalizadoras e em busca dos escopos fixados na Constituição de 1988. / The aim of this study is to examine engineering risk insurance as an instrument of development. The perspective adopted here is an articulation between Law and Political Economy, beginning with the idea that legal categories determine political economy. In this sense, insurance contracts are construed as non-dissociated from the community operations to which they belong and from their special task of social and economic reorganization. The social function of insurance contracts is seen as an inexorable part of the autonomous will involved in such contracts. The relationship between insurance and development is even more evident in engineering risk insurance, which is the specific object of this study. Having been institutionalized since the 1930s, the developmental function of this type insurance began to decline in the mid-1980s, and clearly worsened in 2007, when the Brazilian reinsurance market was opened. We propose that the Brazilian legislation on engineering risk insurance is inadequate and acts as an impediment to national development. The main reason for this is the gradual loss of content in this type of insurance, in part promoted by the State itself, captive to the interests of industry executives. The attempt to nullify the theory of interest well established not only in longstanding insurance practice, but also in national and international tenets, and shaped by Article 757 of the Brazilian Civil Code is one of the main arguments explored here. Finally, we present some provisions of Senate Bill no. 477/2013 that seeks to incorporate into the system of positive law Brazils first law of insurance contract, the aim of which is to reorder contractual relations by eliminating the major defunctionalizing practices, in keeping with the intentions of the 1988 Constitution.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:22:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Julia de Menezes Nogueira.pdf: 1724982 bytes, checksum: f16458f87287a0130bcd9bbe73ead4ed (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-04 / The goal of this thesis is to analyze, from the perspective of Logical-Semantic Constructivism, all the tax norms incident on insurance, reinsurance and pension plans. We also went through the tax rules applicable to revenues and profits (or surplus) of the entities that are necessary parties to those contracts: insurers, reinsurers, open and closed private pension entities. The analysis of these normative sets under a single point of view is justified, since the contracts on focus and the activities of these entities have a common goal of ensuring risks. In the case of insurance risks, the risks must only be lawful and subject to the categories of damage insurance and personal insurance. In the case of private pension, it protects primarily the social risk of old age. Regarding the taxation of the entities, identity is shown in many aspects, especially the requirement for establishment of technical provisions to meet the future obligations, providence that must necessarily be observed by the Tax Law. In the last chapter, we concentrate on the system built in Brazil, during the last two decades, regarding the taxation of private pension plans. We analyzed each of its stages, to conclude that currently a scheme called "EET" (exemption/exemption/taxation) is adopted, according to which in the first step exemption and deductibility of contributions are granted, in the second step there is also income tax exemption during the accumulation of resources in the plan, with taxation only in the third stage, when the perception of benefits or redemption by the beneficiary occurs, privileging the long-term savings as opposed to the immediate consumption of the income / Nosso objetivo, neste trabalho, é analisar, sob a perspectiva do Constructivismo Lógico-Semântico, as normas tributárias incidentes sobre o seguro, o resseguro e os planos de previdência privada. Também nos ocupamos da tributação incidente sobre as receitas e lucros (ou superávit) das entidades que são partes necessárias nesses contratos: seguradoras, resseguradoras, entidades abertas e fechadas de previdência complementar. A análise desses conjuntos normativos sob ponto de vista único se justifica, pois os contratos em foco e as atividades desenvolvidas pelas referidas entidades têm como objetivo comum garantir cobertura de riscos. No caso do seguro, riscos de qualquer natureza, bastando que sejam lícitos e submetidos às categorias de seguro de dano e seguro de pessoas. No caso da previdência privada, protege-se primordialmente o risco social da velhice. No último capítulo, nos concentramos sobre o sistema construído no País, nas últimas duas décadas, voltado à tributação dos planos de previdência privada. Analisamos cada uma de suas etapas, para concluir que atualmente se adota regime denominado IIT , segundo o qual há isenção e dedutibilidade na etapa das contribuições, isenção na etapa da acumulação dos recursos no plano, havendo tributação somente por ocasião da percepção dos benefícios, ou resgate, pelo beneficiário, privilegiando-se a poupança de longo prazo em detrimento do consumo imediato