Språket är den viktigaste faktorn för integration och nyligen har kraven på kunskaper i svenska skärpts. För att fungera fullt ut i det svenska samhället krävs en läsförmåga i nivå med årskurs 6, men en tidigare undersökning visar att majoriteten av vuxna invandrare efter avslutad SFI-utbildning endast har en läsförmåga i nivå med årskurs 3-5. En läsintervention med single-subject design har därför genomförts med tre elever på kurs C på SFI. Läsinterventionen har genomförts med Wendick-modellens läslistor tre gånger i veckan under sju veckor, totalt 20 lektioner. Resultaten visade en ökning på Avkodning Ord för en av eleverna och en ökning på Avkodning Nonord för alla tre eleverna. Dessa resultat visar att Wendick-modellens läslistor är en fungerande metod i en-till-en-situationer då elevernas avkodning på nonord har förbättrats av interventionen. Studiens resultat visar även vikten av tidiga insatser för att ge elever med bristande läs- och skrivfärdigheter rätt hjälp och stöd från studiestart för att de snabbare ska kunna integreras i samhället.

No description available.

Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka vilka digitala verktyg som används i SFI-undervisningen av vuxna elever utan skolbakgrund och hur dessa verktyg används, vilka förmågor eleverna övar samt vilken betydelse digitala verktyg har i dessa elevers språkinlärning. För att undersöka det har jag använt mig av en metodkombination av strukturerade observationer i två A-grupper samt semistrukturerade intervjuer med två undervisande lärare i dessa grupper.  Studiens resultat visar att de digitala verktyg som används i A-kurs är Ipad och appar, Smart Notebook/Smartboard, Dator, Lunis och Powerpoint. Dessa verktyg används mestadels för individuellt arbete men det finns tillfällen då vissa av dessa verktyg används i helklass. Eleverna övar med stöd av dessa verktyg förmågan att lyssna och förstå, tala (uttal), läsa och förstå, skriva och arbeta självständigt. Studiens resultat visar även en tämligen liten interaktion mellan elever under tiden de arbetar med digitala verktyg.  Lärarnas uppfattningar är att digitala verktyg har en stor betydelse i språkinlärningen hos vuxna elever utan skolbakgrund. Enligt lärarna erbjuder digitala verktyg en mängd olika möjligheter för dessa elever att öva och utveckla samtliga språkfärdigheter. Studien visar även att det finns vissa områden som kan utvecklas. / The purpose of this study is to investigate which digital tools are used in SFI teaching of adult students without school background and how these tools are used, what abilities the students practice and what significance digital tools have in these students language learning. To investigate this, I have used a method combination of structured observations in two A-groups as well as semi-structured interviews with two teachers in these groups. The results show that the digital tools used in the A-course are Ipad and apps, Smart Notebook/Smartboard, Computer, Lunis and Powerpoint. These tools are mostly used for individual work, but there are times when some of these tools are used in full class. With the help of these tools, students practice the ability to listen and understand, speak (pronounce), read and understand, write and work independently. The results also show a fairly small interaction between students while working with digital tools. Teachers’ perceptions are that digital tools are of great importance in the language learning of adult learners without a school background. According to the teachers, digital tools offer a wide variety of opportunities for these students to practice and develop all language skills. The study also shows that there are certain areas that can be developed.

Textbooks within Swedish for Immigrants aims to teach immigrants the Swedish language and help them understand Swedish society. But one can ask: is there a representative picture of all people in Swedish society in these textbooks? This study aims to analyze which discourses are made visible regarding what kind of people are represented in textbooks for Swedish for Immigrants. Two textbooks from different times are chosen to make a comparison, and to see what and if there has been development in the way one talks about people with non-Swedish and non-white names. The questions asked are: Who is given space in two textbooks for Swedish for Immigrants? And what kind of development has been made within this area between the years 2002 and 2021? The method used is discourse analysis based on a social constructive perspective, which means that people adopt the discourses they read and learn about, which affects the way they see society and how they interact with others. The result shows that similar discourses are found in both textbooks, where three main discourses appear: us and them, Swedish/white is the norm, and immigrants only have lower-paid jobs in society. People with non-Swedish and non-white names are not given as much space in the textbooks as people with Swedish and white names. The older textbook contains of a majority Swedish names whereas the newer textbook contains more international names, but that are considered white names. This shows that there is an us and them-discourse occurring. The us and them-discourse appear in different ways throughout the textbooks and is more implicit in the newer textbook compared to the older. Another example of this discourse is that people with non-Swedish and non-white names are often presented with where they come from, which is not the case for people with Swedish names. This shows that there is a certain way of speaking of people with non-Swedish and non-white names in society. In conclusion, there are more Swedish and white people who are given space in these textbooks for Swedish for immigrants. Considering that immigrants are the target group for these textbooks, there should be a representation of all different people in Swedish society. Seen from a social constructive perspective, immigrants who read these textbooks will adopt these discourses, which will affect how they see Swedish society and how they interact with others. The development discovered between the two textbooks and their almost 20-year difference of release is shown in the discourse of immigrants only having lower-paid jobs. The newer textbook shows no evidence of this discourse whereas it appears in the older textbook. This shows that development has been made in how society thinks of immigrants and their ability to work within any profession.