• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 3
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Materialitet och läsinteraktion : En undersökning kring ungdomars attityd till ett e-bokformat kontra tryckt bok / Materiality and the interaction of reading : A study of teenagers´ attitudes to the form of e-book versus printed book

Albertsson, Ylva, Grönkvist, Erika January 2016 (has links)
The purpose of this thesis is to study the importance of materiality for the interaction of reading among teenagers, age 15-16. The purpose is also to study if the attitude to the form of e-book versus the printed book differs depending on how comfortable the teenagers are with the activity of reading. The method we have chosen for this study is the form of semi-structured interviews, four with teenagers who are positive to fiction reading and four with teenagers who say they don´t like fiction reading. We analyse the teenagers´answers by looking at some aspects of materiality to see how these aspects affect the interaction of reading.During the interview the respondents were asked to read one chapter of a book on an Ipad and the next chapter in a printed book. Our study shows that materiality is a factor for the interaction of reading and it can lead to different experiences of reading. Some aspects that the respondents mention as important are the amount of text, the typeface and the feeling of holding a book. The ones who are comfortable with the activity of reading claim they would still choose the printed book after reading both on the Ipad and in the printed book. The ones who are less comfortable with reading are more positive to the e-book, than they were before.
2

Praktiskt taget samma sak : En studie om studenters informationspraktiker i tryckta och digitala bokformat / Practically the same : A study about students’ information practices when using print and digital book formats

Hjertzell, Emma January 2022 (has links)
Students' usage of print versus e-book formats has been a subject of interest for research since the e-book started gaining popularity. These studies tend to emphasise student preferences and the reasons behind them which has led to a fairly well explored subject around the world. However, less emphasis is put on students’ information practices when using these formats.  This master’s thesis aims to add to the knowledge about the information practices of university students when using course literature in print versus e-book formats. To do this, semistructured interviews through Zoom were conducted with eight students. With practice theory as the theoretical lens, qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the material. The results shows that easy access to course literature is a main factor when choosing format, which indicates that preferences does not necessarily solely shape the information practice. E-books are used extensively by the students for easy access, even though there is a clear overall preference for print. The print format however seems to be providing a better overview of the whole book that favours the search process. The students also describe a feeling of deeper connection with print books and these are therefore used to understand complex texts, as well as when the students better want to remember what they have read. However, information practices described in regards to the e-book is not portrayed as a bad alternative. Rather, it is described as fitting for information practices that require shallower information processing.
3

”Det finns ingen app som kan lära elever att läsa!” : En kvalitativ studie om F-3 lärares erfarenheter kring valet av digitala texter kontra tryckta böcker i undervisningen / “There is no application that can teach students to read!” : A qualitative study on teachers' experiences regarding the choices of digital texts versus printed books in teaching.

Berlin, Emma, Svärd, Cecilia January 2023 (has links)
Studiens syfte är att undersöka F3-lärares perspektiv i valet av tryckta böcker kontra digitala texter i deras undervisning samt identifiera eventuella orsaker till att läraren väljer det ena eller det andra pedagogiska verktyget i undervisningen.Studien är en kvalitativ studie med åtta deltagande informanter. Datainsamlingsmetoden var semistrukturerade intervjuer. Resultatet utgår från informanternas utsagor. I studien framkommer det att informanterna upplever både möjligheter och hinder med tryckta böcker och digitala texter i läsundervisningen. Fördelarna med tryckta böcker anses vara att det är lättare att bläddra tillbaka och stryka under samt att boken har en mer avskalad karaktär. Informanterna delar upplevelsen av att den tryckta boken erbjuder en speciell känsla när man öppnar den och att eleverna därav lägger mer fokus på den faktiska läsningen. Hindren med tryckta böcker anser informanterna bland annat vara den ekonomiska begränsningen, det vill säga att det oftast bara finns enstaka exemplar av böckerna. Utifrån informanternas utsagor om digitala texter och dessas möjligheter är att det digitala verktyget erbjuder texter på olika språk och det blir mindre utpekande vid nivåläsning. Vidare påpekar de att det är fördelaktigt med uppläsning samt att kunna visa texter i helklass på projektorn och det stora titelutbudet som erbjuds via de digitala lärplattformerna. Informanternas mest uttalade hinder med digital läsning är utifrån studien de många distraktionsmomenten som medföljer och eleverna tycks tappa läsningen på grund av bekvämligheten i att kunna lyssna på en text.
4

Don't judge a book by its cover – Using E-books in higher education

Juneby, Anna January 2012 (has links)
Denna uppsats handlar om användningen av E-böcker inom högre utbildning vid Malmö Högskola. Syftet är att undersöka studenters attityder när det gäller användningen av E-böcker jämfört med den tryckta motsvarigheten vid akademiska studier. Studien granskar studenternas preferenser vidanvändningen av E-böcker jämfört med tryckta böcker, samt hur dessa media påverkar studenternas läsvanor. Genom att klargöra i vilka situationer E-böcker eller tryckta böcker har mest fördelar, så kan studenterna göra välgrundade val om vilket medium som de har störst nytta av. En nätbaserad enkät och inspelade intervjuer utgjorde metoderna för insamlingen av data, som sedan jämfördes med tidigare publicerade relevanta studier. Det visade sig att studenterna föredrog tryckta böcker för sina studier, och dessa böcker används fortfarande i första hand vid läsning och analys av längre textavsnitt. Däremot befanns E-böcker vara bäst när man skriver forskningsrapporter. Detta betyder att båda dessa media även framgent har en given plats inom denhögre utbildningen. / This thesis is about the use of E-books in higher education, specifically at Malmö University. The purpose of this study is to investigate attitudes students have towards the use of E-books for scholarly purposes in higher education versus their printed counterparts. This study looks at student preferences in the use of E-books compared to printed books, along with the effects these media have on students reading habits. By discovering in which situations E-books or printed books are most beneficial, students can make informed decisions about which medium will benefit them the most. An online survey and recorded interviews were used as methods for collecting data, whichwas then compared to previously published studies related to this subject. Students were found to prefer the printed book for studying purposes, and it still remains as the main source for reading and analyzing longer passages of text. E-books, on the other hand, were found to be most advantageous when preparing research reports. This means that both media still have their place inhigher education, which is likely to continue in the foreseeable future.

Page generated in 0.0345 seconds