Frequently, deep foundations extend through potentially liquefiable soils. When liquefaction occurs in cohesionless soils surrounding a deep foundation, the skin-friction in the liquefied layer is compromised. After cyclical forces suspend and pore pressures dissipate, effective stress rebuilds and the liquefied soil consolidates. When the settlement of the soil exceeds the downward movement of the foundation, downdrag develops. To investigate the loss and redevelopment of skin-friction, strain was measured on an instrumented micropile during a blast-induced liquefaction test in Mirabello, Italy. The soil profile where the micropile was installed consisted of clay to a depth of 6m underlain by a medium to dense sand. The 25cm diameter steel reinforced concrete micropile was bored to a depth of 17m. Pore pressure transducers were placed around the pile at various depths to observe excess pore pressure generation and dissipation. Soil strain was monitored with profilometers in a linear arrangement from the center of the 10m diameter ring of buried explosives out to a 12m radius. Immediately following the blast, liquefaction developed between 6m and 12m below ground. The liquefied layer settled 14cm (~2.4% volumetric strain) while the pile toe settled 1.24cm under elastic displacement. The static neutral plane in the pile occurred at a depth of 12m. From 6m to 12m below ground, the incremental skin-friction was 50% compared to pre-liquefaction measurements. The decrease in residual skin-friction is consistent with measurements observed by Dr. Kyle Rollins from previous full-scale tests in Vancouver, BC, Canada, Christchurch, New Zealand, and Turrel, Arkansas.

AbstractThroughout the world today, there is unquestionably, an increasing interest surrounding issuesconcerning sustainability, and this has in turn led to new discussions regarding the developmentof sustainability reporting. It is mandatory in Sweden for example, for companies which meetcertain criteria set by the ÅRL, to prepare reports on sustainability, including a compulsoryannual summary. But currently there exists no global guidelines for these reports, andcompanies worldwide have been making such reports in different ways and with differentmethods with no clear standards, which in turn can create confusion and ambiguity forstakeholders and investors. Therefore, IASB along with IFRS Foundation as a frontrunnerpresented a Consultation Paper with proposals for developing and streamlining globalsustainability reporting. They requested company stakeholders to respond to these ideas via CLwhich were designed with carefully targeted questions to best conclude what they thought ofthe proposals. The culmination of completed CL provides empirical and invaluable evidencewhich can then be used to accelerate and thus make it easier to establish the aforementionedproposals.The purpose of the study is to examine the attitudes regarding the suggested sustainabilityreporting proposals, and to analyze the ways in which the attitudes vary between the differentgroups of stakeholders. The study is also to clarify where organizations stand regardingsustainability in relation to their stakeholders and investors, as well as globally, and if patternsin their attitudes can be discovered.The result of the study shows that most of the represented stakeholders show a positive responseto the IFRS Foundations propositions regarding an update of the reporting on sustainability.However, it has also highlighted some negative responses to each question, but on the wholethose opinions were underrepresented. To summarize, most of the CL analyzed show apredominantly favorable response to a global standard concerning sustainability reporting andthe majority have agreed that its right that the IFRS Foundation have the leading role in thismatter. It also stands clear after analysis that several stakeholders think that it is advisable thatthe main focus should be on the financial reports within sustainability and that it should bepublic.The study concludes that several patterns can be found within the stakeholder’s attitudes.Including the consensus that developing better sustainability reporting is an urgent matter thatdemands more attention. These empirical findings lead to the conclusion that the majority feelthat sustainability reporting should take a wider perspective and not only focus on the financialrisks within sustainability. Although they collectively accept that the financial implications area good place to start discussions regarding interests globally. Several stakeholders also pointout that without increased guidelines and rules for generic reporting, that information can bemanipulated or used disingenuously to embellish a company’s actions regarding sustainability.They therefore suggest that the reporting should be made public to alleviate the risk of problemssuch as greenwashing.To summarize, the stakeholder’s interests can both be united or divided, regardless of whichindustry they operate in. But what does, without question, unite them the most in this study, isthe understanding and willingness to make changes for the future with regard to sustainabilityin both social, economic and environment matters. / SammanfattningI takt med konsumenter och intressenters stigande intresse för hållbarhet i stort, harhållbarhetsredovisningens ramverk och utveckling diskuterats. Det är idag obligatoriskt förföretag i Sverige som uppfyller minst två av tre krav som finns i ÅRL att upprätta enhållbarhetsredovisning i samband med publicering av sin årsredovisning. Det finns ett flertalramverk att följa och företag världen över gör på olika sätt, vilket kan skapa förvirring ochotydlighet hos intressenter och investerare. IASB har därför, med IFRS Foundation som aktör,sammanställt ett Consultation Paper där de ger förslag på hur hållbarhetsredovisningen vidarekan utvecklas. Till detta uppmanas intressenter att skicka in så kallade CL där de besvararsammanlagt 10 olika frågor och därmed bidrar med sina åsikter i ämnet. De insamlade CL utgörstudiens empiri och bildar tillsammans med bland annat den modifierade intressentmodellengrunden för att besvara frågeställningarna.Syftet med studien är således att undersöka vilka attityder som framkommer av de inskickadeCL gällande IASB:s föreslagna arbete och utveckling av hållbarhetsredovisning, samt på vilketsätt attityderna skiljer sig åt beroende på vilken intressentgrupp som avses. Studien ska hjälpatill att klargöra hur olika företag och organisationer ställer sig till utveckling avhållbarhetsredovisning. Studien ska vidare presentera hur betydelsefullt hållbarhet är för såvälintressenter och investerare som världen i stort och om det finns mönster i intressenternasattityder.Resultatet av studien visar att majoriteten av de intressenter som presenterats i studien ärpositiva till IFRS Foundations förslag gällande utveckling av hållbarhetsredovisning. Detframkom dock negativa och ifrågasättande kommentarer till varje fråga men dessa var i detstora hela underrepresenterade. Sammanfattningsvis är merparten av de CL som bearbetatspositiva till ett globalt ramverk inom hållbarhetsredovisning och att IFRS Foundation bör varaden aktör som leder arbetet. Vidare anser flera intressenter att det är en god idé att fokus främstska ligga på de finansiella rapporterna inom hållbarhet samt att hållbarhetsredovisningen skavara publik.En av studiens två slutsatser efter bearbetning av empirin är att det uppstår ett flertal mönsterbland intressenternas attityder som både enar och skiljer dem åt. Däribland åsikten om attutvecklingen av hållbarhetsredovisning är ett brådskande ärende som bör prioriteras, därsamtliga intressenter instämmer. Den andra slutsats som framkommer är att majoritet uppleveratt hållbarhetsredovisningen bör ta ett bredare perspektiv och inte bara representera definansiella riskerna inom hållbarhet. Denna åsikt presenteras även om flertal också tillägger attdet är en bra start för en global standard att anta ett främsta fokus först. Ett flertal intressenterpåpekar också risken för att informationen kan missleda eller vinklas för att presentera företageti bättre ljus. Sammanfattningsvis visar det sig att intressenternas intressen kan både krocka medvarandra och förenas oavsett vilken intressentgrupp de verkar inom. Det som enarrespondenterna främst i denna studie är medvetenheten och viljan att skapa förändring inomhållbarhet i socialt, ekonomiskt och miljömässigt perspektiv.

I slutet på 2019 sattes en projektgrupp ihop av IFRS Foundation, med målet att undersöka intressenters efterfrågan på redovisning för hållbarhet och ta reda på vad IFRS Foundations kunde göra för att svara på den eventuella efterfrågan. Detta mynnade ut i ett dokument som kallas consultation paper on sustainability reporting, som släpptes i september 2020. Dokumentet behandlar det eventuella behovet av globala redovisningsstandarder för hållbarhet, huruvida IFRS Foundation ska vara delaktiga och i så fall hur mycket. IFRS Foundation presenterar ett förslag om ett Sustainability Standards Board, som innebär att, under styrning av IFRS Foundation, utveckla globala redovisningsstandarder för hållbarhet. Problemdiskussionen för studien presenterar olika intressenters behov av redovisningsstandarder för hållbarhet samt hur utbudet på redovisningsstandarder för hållbarhet ser ut idag, vilket resulterade i studiens syfte. Studiens första syfte är att undersöka hur olika intressenters attityder skiljer sig åt gällande huruvida det finns ett behov av globala redovisningsstandarder för hållbarhet. Det andra syftet är att undersöka hur intressenters attityder skiljer sig åt huruvida IFRS Foundation kan använda sina relationer för att för att främja ett redovisningsramverk för hållbarhet, och ifall ett sådant ramverk bör verka under IFRS Foundation. Studien har använt sig av en abduktiv forskningsansats som utgångspunkt, vilket implicerar både deduktiva och induktiva inslag. Intentionen med studien har varit att analysera och tolka dokument för att få en djupare förståelse för intressenternas kommentarer, vilket har resulterat i att en kvalitativ innehållsanalys har använts. Den 11 februari hade IFRS Foundation tagit emot 577 kommentarer från intressenter. Urvalsprocessen resulterade i totalt 277 av dessa som är utgångspunkt för studiens empiri och analys. Studiens resultat visar på att en stark majoritet av intressenterna menar att det finns ett behov av globala redovisningsstandarder för hållbarhet och att de lämpligen kan operera under IFRS Foundations struktur. Resultatet framför även att respondenterna värdesätter IFRS Foundations intressenter och relationer de har utvecklat under arbetet med finansiell redovisning. Däremot att de saknar expertis och erfarenhet från hållbarhetsarbete. Studiens slutsatser är att det inte framkom några skillnader mellan intressentgruppernas attityder i någon av aspekterna, då i princip alla är positiva till IFRS Foundations frågor. Detta ger i sig en signal att IFRS Foundations förslag om att skapa Sustainability Standards Board bör förverkligas, men att de bör göras i samarbete med andra initiativ. / At the end of 2019, a project group was put together by IFRS Foundation, with the goal of examining stakeholders' demand for accounting for sustainability and finding out what IFRS Foundations could do to respond to any demand. This resulted in a document called consultation paper on sustainability reporting, which was released in September 2020. The document addresses the possible need for global accounting standards for sustainability, whether IFRS Foundation should be involved and, if so, how much. IFRS Foundation presents a proposal for a Sustainability Standards Board, which involves, under the direction of the IFRS Foundation, developing global accounting standards for sustainability. The problem discussion for the study presents different stakeholders' needs for accounting standards for sustainability and what the range of accounting standards for sustainability looks like today, which resulted in the purpose of the study. The first purpose of the study is to examine how the attitudes of different stakeholders differ regarding whether there is a need for global accounting standards for sustainability. The second purpose is to examine how stakeholders' attitudes differ as to whether the IFRS Foundation can use its relationships to promote an accounting framework for sustainability, and whether such a framework should operate under the IFRS Foundation. The study has used an abductive research approach as a starting point, which means both deductive and inductive elements. The intention of the study has been to analyse and interpret documents to gain a deeper understanding of the stakeholders' comments, which has resulted in the use of a qualitative content analysis. As of February 11, it had received 577 comments from stakeholders. The selection process resulted in a total of 277 comment letters, which is the foundation of the study's empirical and analytic component. The results of the study show that a strong majority of stakeholders believe that there is a need for global accounting standards for sustainability and that they can appropriately operate under the governance structure of the IFRS Foundation. The result also states that respondents value IFRS Foundation's stakeholders and relationships they have developed during their work with financial accounting. However, they lack expertise and experience from sustainability work. The conclusion is that there were no differences between stakeholder groups in any of the aspects, since virtually everyone is in favour of IFRS Foundation's issues. This sends a signal that the IFRS Foundation's proposal to create the Sustainability Standards Board should be implemented, but that they should be implemented in cooperation with other initiatives.This master's thesis is written in Swedish.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / A historical analysis of the philanthropic response to the Great Depression by community foundations; the thesis uses the individual story of the Indianapolis Foundation as a case study to provide detailed examples of how community foundations modified their grant-making behavior in response to the Great Depression’s economic effects.

No description available.

Today the Internet of Things (IoT) lacks universal standards for communication and interaction between devices. There is a wide collection of diverse software architectures for IoT applications on the market, where smart devices from different manufacturers are often unable to interact with each other. A standards organization within IoT gaining recognition is the Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF), an industry group delivering an IoT software framework specification and a product certification program. Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF) is funding an open source reference implementation of the specification called IoTivity, which runs as middleware intended to be portable to all operating systems and connectivity platforms. The goal of the OCF is to enable interoperability between IoT devices regardless of manufacturer, operating system, chipset or physical transport. Through a literature review, the key functional and non-functional requirements for IoT middleware architectures were found. Functionality requirements identified were data management, resource management, resource discovery, and contextawareness. The quality attributes were found to be interoperability, adaptability, scalability, security, and real-time behavior.In this thesis project, IoTivity was evaluated with respect to these requirements with the scenario-based Method for Evaluating Middleware Architectures (MEMS). As a part of MEMS, a case study of implementing a building management system (BMS) with IoTivity was conducted. Results showed that, within the framework of the case study, IoTivity complied with three out of four functional requirements, and three out of five quality requirements identified for IoT middleware architectures. One of the quality requirements, security, was not evaluated in this study. / Idag finns det redan många olika mjukvaruarkitekturer för sakernas internet, på engelska Internet of Things (IoT), ute på marknaden. Ett problem är att det ännu inte finns några brett accepterade standarder för hur dessa saker ska interagera. Det kan ofta innebära att uppkopplade enheter från olika tillverkare inte fungerar ihop. Det finns ett flertal organisationer som försöker etablera standarder för sakernas internet, på alla olika nivåer i kommunikationskedjan. En av de organisationer som nämns allt oftare är Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF). Det är en grupp av ledande företag som har specificerat ett mjukvaruramverk för IoT och ett tillhörande program för produktcertifiering. De sponsrar även en referensimplementation av detta ramverk med öppen källkod som kallas IoTivity. Denna referensimplementation körs som en mellanvara och är tänkt att vara portabel till flera olika mjukoch hårdvaruplattformar. OCFs långsiktiga mål är att möjliggöra kommunikation mellan uppkopplade enheter oberoende av deras tillverkare, operativsystem, chip-setoch kommunikationsteknik. Genom en studie av tidigare forskning kunde de mest väsentliga funktionella och kvalitativa kraven på IoT-mellanvara sammanställas. Bland de funktionella kraven fanns datahantering, resurshantering, kontextmedvetenhet och mekanismer för att upptäcka enheter i nätverket. De kvalitativa kraven inkluderade interoperabilitet, anpassningsbarhet, skalbarhet, säkerhet och realtidsbeteende. Examensarbetet har utvärderat IoTivity med avseende på ovan nämnda krav genom en scenariobaserad evalueringsmetod kallad Method for Evaluating Middleware Architectures (MEMS). Som en del av MEMS genomfördes en fallstudie där en systemprototyp för fastighetsautomation implementerades med IoTivity. Resultat från genomförda experiment visade att, inom ramarna för fallstudien, kunde IoTivity uppfylla tre av de fyra funktionella kraven och tre av de fem kvalitativa kraven. Ett av de kvalitativa kraven, säkerhet, utvärderades inte i det här projektet.

This study views the Field Band Foundation’s activities through the lens of artistic citizenship. The aim of this study is to create an expanded theoretical framework for music education as/for artistic citizenship by analysing the related literature and data gathered from the Field Band Foundation in the Gauteng area. In Another Perspective: Music Education as/for Artistic Citizenship Elliott (2012a) gives practitioners three goals to realize if they wish to empower participants to achieve artistic citizenship. These three goals may be summarized as: 1) putting music to work in the community 2) infusing music with an ethic of care and 3) making music as ethical action for social justice. These three goals served as the initial compass during the conception and analysis stages of this study. This study was designed as an instrumental case study. The eclectic data set is made up of literature, interviews, documents, visual and audio-visual data gathered from March 2013 to July 2014. Atlas.ti7 was used to analyse the data. A preliminary theoretical framework was created from the literature. In this framework each of the three themes, expressed through Elliott’s goals, are expanded to include various categories. This framework was used as a priori codes to better understand artistic citizenship as lived in the Field Band Foundation. During the analysis of the data gathered from the Field Band Foundation the categories identified in the literature was expanded to include sub-categories. After analysing the data, gathered in the Field Band Foundation, an expanded theoretical framework for artistic citizenship was created. From the view point of artistic citizenship a community music education project, such as the Field Band Foundation, is shown to empower participants to achieve personal and communal transformation. / MMus (Musicology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015

This study views the Field Band Foundation’s activities through the lens of artistic citizenship. The aim of this study is to create an expanded theoretical framework for music education as/for artistic citizenship by analysing the related literature and data gathered from the Field Band Foundation in the Gauteng area. In Another Perspective: Music Education as/for Artistic Citizenship Elliott (2012a) gives practitioners three goals to realize if they wish to empower participants to achieve artistic citizenship. These three goals may be summarized as: 1) putting music to work in the community 2) infusing music with an ethic of care and 3) making music as ethical action for social justice. These three goals served as the initial compass during the conception and analysis stages of this study. This study was designed as an instrumental case study. The eclectic data set is made up of literature, interviews, documents, visual and audio-visual data gathered from March 2013 to July 2014. Atlas.ti7 was used to analyse the data. A preliminary theoretical framework was created from the literature. In this framework each of the three themes, expressed through Elliott’s goals, are expanded to include various categories. This framework was used as a priori codes to better understand artistic citizenship as lived in the Field Band Foundation. During the analysis of the data gathered from the Field Band Foundation the categories identified in the literature was expanded to include sub-categories. After analysing the data, gathered in the Field Band Foundation, an expanded theoretical framework for artistic citizenship was created. From the view point of artistic citizenship a community music education project, such as the Field Band Foundation, is shown to empower participants to achieve personal and communal transformation. / MMus (Musicology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015

Published Article / The purpose of this paper, based on a doctoral study, is to examine how teachers in the Foundation Phase of schools in the Free State province perceived, conceptualised and implemented Developmental Appraisal System (DAS) as a component of the Integrated Quality Management System (IQMS). The epistemological and ontological perspectives pertaining to both quantitative and qualitative approaches compelled the researcher to choose the Mixed Method Research (MMR). Data analysis consisted of the inferential and descriptive statistics for quantitative data analysis and, themes, patterns and behaviours for qualitative data analysis. Unbalanced two-way ANOVA, T-test and frequency distributions were used in analysis of quantitative data while themes and patterns resembled qualitative data analysis. The majority of teachers perceived DAS as a developmental process while a sizable minority claimed to the contrary. The Department of Basic Education did not provide direct training to teachers on matters pertaining to both the DAS and IQMS. Furthermore, the money reward earned through the process of DAS was perceived to be a source of conflict between teachers and school management.

Published Article / This study reports the findings of the doctoral studies on curriculum adaptations for learners with learning impairments. The researchers conducted a phenomenological study to examine how teachers apply curriculum adaptations for learners with learning impairments in the Foundation Phase through their teaching experience. The sample consisted of 20 Foundation Phase teachers and 22 learners. The authors Interviewed 20 teachers and observed interactions between teachers and learners as well as between learners. The findings suggested that although most teachers (18) claimed that they adapted the product, they in fact only adapted time and activities. The researchers recommends in-service training for teachers by Learning Support Advisors (LSAs) and Subject Advisors (SAs) on how to adapt curricula to the needs of learners with learning impairments in the Foundation Phase. The researchers designed a model on how Foundation Phase teachers could adapt the curriculum for learners with learning impairments in the Foundation Phase.