Orientador: Luiz Cesar Marques Filho / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-18T19:25:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Byington_ElisaLustosa_D.pdf: 11767756 bytes, checksum: cc888a875e1153c43477a94f879eb9be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 / Resumo: A primeira edição de "As Vidas dos mais excelentes arquitetos, pintores e escultores italianos de Cimabue aos nossos dias", escrita por Giorgio Vasari (1511-1574), arquiteto e pintor de Arezzo, é publicada em 1550. Ela é marcada pelas questões que animavam a Academia Florentina (1541) - a questão da historia, da língua vernácula e da sua difusão - e pela "disputa entre as artes", conforme proposta por Benedetto Varchi (1503-1565) nas célebres "Duas Lições". A segunda edição das "Vidas", publicada em 1568, será marcada por outra academia e por nova versão da "disputa"; i.é, pela Academia delle Arti del Disegno e o texto "Una Selva di Notizie", escrito por Dom Vincenzo Borghini(1515-1580), lugar-tenente da nova academia, rediscutindo a hierarquia entre as artes. Para a nova Academia, fundada em 1563, e para o texto "Una Selva di Notizie" (1564), a referência e modelo eram aqueles, institucional e intelectual, da década de "40. Tanto a academia dos artistas, fundada pelo próprio Vasari junto com o filólogo Borghini, seria inspirada na Academia Florentina, conforme declarado por eles, quanto a retomada da "disputa entre as artes" pelo lugar-tenente da Academia do Desenho, fazia referência à Lição de Varchi e às cartas escritas pelos artistas em resposta ao debate de quase vinte anos antes. Tais aspectos institucionais, e as distintas características do debate intelectual, influenciam respectivamente cada uma das edições com idéias que procuramos ressaltar e analisar no âmbito da política cultural do duque Cosimo I / Abstract: The first edition os the "Lives of the most excellent architetcts, painters and sculptors from Cimabue to ourdays" written by Giorgio Vasari (1511-1574), architect and painter of Arezzo, is published in 1550. It is marked by questions that directed the Florentine Academy (1541) - the question of history, of the vernacular ando its dissemination - and by the "dispute between the arts", as proposed by Benedetto Varchi (1503- 1565) in the famous "Due Lezzioni" (Two Lessons). The second edition of the "Lives", published in 1568, is marked by another Academy and by new version of the "dispute"; i.e. by the Academia delle Arti del Disegno and the text "Una Selva di Notizie", written by Don Vincenzo Borghini(1515-1580), lieutenant of the new Academy, rejudging the hierarchy between the arts. For the new Academy, founded in 1563, and the text "Una Selva di Notizie" (1564), the reference and model were those, institutional and intellectual, of the "40s. Both the academy of the artists, founded by Vasari himself along with the philologist Borghini, would be inspired by the Florentine Academy, as stated by them, as the resumption of the "dispute between the arts" by the Lieutenant of the Academy of drawing, made reference to the Lesson of Varchi and letters written by the artists in response to the debate of almost twenty years before. Such institutional aspects, and the distinct characteristics of the intellectual debate, influence respectively each of editions with ideas that emphasize and analyze the cultural policy of the Duke Cosimo / Doutorado / Historia da Arte / Doutor em História

Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2015-12-03T14:19:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 talissonmelodesouza.pdf: 5159280 bytes, checksum: 518577b5946c28a4a28d6be6120c76c2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2015-12-03T14:21:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 talissonmelodesouza.pdf: 5159280 bytes, checksum: 518577b5946c28a4a28d6be6120c76c2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-12-03T14:21:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 talissonmelodesouza.pdf: 5159280 bytes, checksum: 518577b5946c28a4a28d6be6120c76c2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-03-05 / A partir do contexto de emergência e consolidação da atividade do curador de exposições de arte contemporânea na esfera artística internacional, esta análise direciona-se a duas edições da Bienal de São Paulo (as 18ª e 19ª, promovidas em 1985 e 1987, respectivamente) para compreender as condições e desdobramentos dessa profissão no Brasil. As curadorias da crítica de arte Sheila Leirner são estudadas aqui em sua singularidade e em relação com diversas exposições realizadas em instituições congêneres. Colocamos em perspectiva a historiografia já estabelecida acerca dessas duas propostas curatoriais (“O Homem e a Vida” e “Utopia versus Realidade”), e esquadrinhamos o debate crítico suscitado por elas dentro e fora do país. Seleções de obras artísticas e artistas, expografia, discurso teórico e poder de legitimação são articulados com a trajetória crítica da curadora e as transformações nas políticas públicas para a cultura e no status das instituições culturais na década de 1980, em diálogo com a os processos de globalização da arte e redemocratização política no Brasil. / From the context of emergency and consolidation of the curator’s activity of organizing contemporary art exhibitions in the international artistic sphere, this analysis focuses on two editions of the Sao Paulo Art Biennial (the 18th and 19th ones, promoted in 1985 and 1987, respectively) to understand the conditions and consequences of this profession in Brazil. Here we study the curatorial projects of the art critic Sheila Leirner in its uniqueness and in relation to other events held in similar institutions. Questioning the approach already established by the Brazilian historiography about these two curatorial proposals ("Man and Life" and "Utopia vs. Reality"), this research scrutinizes the critical debate raised by them within and outside the country. We also link selections of art works and artists, expography, theoretical discourse and legitimation power to Leirner’s critic production and the transformations in public policy for culture and cultural institutions status during the 1980s, connecting them to the processes of globalization of art and political redemocratization in Brazil.

Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T18:24:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao_flavia_alves.pdf: 728457 bytes, checksum: d75aa1f95c39f91b1595fb98cb0767e4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-11-01 / We undertaken in this work, an analysis of six critical texts about the work of the Pernambucano painter Cicero Dias. In the light of the theoretical citation of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), specifically of the three-dimensional model analysis of proposed speech by Norman Fairclough (2001),we identified in the critiques that make up the corpus of our work, the enunciated modality, the intertextuality, the interdiscursivity and the ethos in order to check that images of the painter s work are built by these texts. To undertake this analysis, we placed Cicero Dias in the scenery of the Brazilian art and we made a brief gathering of his life and the phases of his work. Furthermore, we examined the nature and origin of the critique of art in Brazil in the same way that we made reflections about the social role of critique and the critical. Our study induced us to infer that the critique of art, while guides the look of the interlocutor, constitutes itself in more one implement formative of opinion Who has imputed to the critical the Power to say and He approval of the society to say what He says. / Empreendemos, neste trabalho, uma análise de seis textos críticos sobre a obra do pintor pernambucano Cícero Dias. À luz do referencial teórico da Análise Crítica do Discurso (ACD), especificamente do modelo tridimensional de análise do discurso proposto por Norman Fairclough (2001), identificamos, nas críticas que compõem o corpus de nosso trabalho, a modalização enunciativa, a intertextualidade, a interdiscursividade e o ethos a fim de verificar que imagens da obra do pintor são construídas por esses textos. Para empreender essa análise, situamos Cícero Dias no cenário da arte brasileira e fizemos um breve apanhado da sua vida e das fases de sua obra. Além disso, investigamos a natureza e a origem da crítica de arte no Brasil assim como fizemos reflexões acerca do papel social da crítica e do crítico. Nosso estudo levou-nos a concluir que a crítica de arte, na medida em que orienta o olhar do interlocutor, constitui-se em mais um instrumento formador de opinião que tem atribuído aos críticos o poder de dizer e a autorização da sociedade para dizer o que diz.

Este estudo trata da crítica de arte de Geraldo Ferraz durante o período das primeiras Bienais de São Paulo. Foi dada especial atenção aos artigos sobre as IV, V e VI Bienais, publicados no jornal O Estado de São Paulo. Através da pesquisa nos arquivos da Fundação Bienal (Arquivo Histórico Wanda Svevo), do Museu de Arte Moderna de São Paulo (MAM SP), do Museu de Arte Contemporânea da Universidade de São Paulo (MAC USP), do Arquivo Edgard Leuenroth da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (AEL UNICAMP), do Centro de Documentação e Memória da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (CEDEM UNESP) e do Arquivo do Estado de São Paulo, foram selecionados e analisados documentos em critica de arte. O crítico Geraldo Ferraz, proveniente do jornalismo e da literatura, contribuiu para difusão da crítica de arte e para o desenvolvimento do jornalismo na área da cultura. Na análise de sua trajetória como crítico, destacou-se a sua reflexão sobre a organização das Bienais e seus posicionamentos estéticos. / This paper regards the art criticism articles written by Geraldo Ferraz about the early Art Biennials in São Paulo. We focused our analysis in the articles written about the 4th, 5th and 6th Biennials, published by the newspaper O Estado de S. Paulo. We used articles, documents and other materials from the following institutions: Fundação Bienal (Historic Archive \'Wanda Svevo\'), Museum of Modern Art of São Paulo (MAM SP), Museum of Contemporary Art of São Paulo University (MAC USP), State University of Campinas\' Arquivo Edgard Leuenroth (AEL UNICAMP), Documentation and Archive Center of the State Universty of São Paulo (CEDEM UNESP) and Archives of the State of São Paulo. The art critic Geraldo Ferraz was an author and journalist, and his work contributed to the establishment of art criticism sections in Brazil\'s media, as well as the development of cultural journalism in the country. In this analysis of his career as a critic, the study highlights his reflections about the organization of the Art Biennials and its aesthetic postures.

En déplaçant les problématiques traditionnelles - celles des analyses strictement nationales - cette thèse propose d'explorer, à l'aide d'une perspective comparative, l'importance donnée au critère moral par la critique, française et anglaise, lors de sa réception de la peinture victorienne. Le corpus de ce travail s'appuie sur l'étude successive des œuvres anglaises présentées tant aux expositions universelles parisiennes (1855, 1867, 1878 et 1889) qu'à la Royal Academy et des commentaires critiques publiés dans la presse spécialisée ou non. Cette démarche révèle la dynamique des échanges interculturels entre les deux pays autour de la question morale et met en évidence l'existence d'une réception nationaliste de l'art par la critique. Dès lors, le jugement porté sur une œuvre par un critique dépend de sa culture, de son goût, mais aussi plus largement du contexte social et des principes propres à sa société. À ce titre, le climat de compétition entre la France et l'Angleterre se retrouve dans les articles et ouvrages publiés de chaque coté de la Manche. De puissants débats critiques mettent en lumière les processus d'appropriation et de rejet participant à la définition des deux cultures artistiques. Ils réunissent art et morale en interrogeant l'existence d'un « grand genre » victorien, l'exposition comme un espace permettant à la critique de circonscrire un art national et de se définir elle-même, ainsi que l'influence moraliste de John Ruskin (1819-1901) sur la société et son art. L'hétérogénéité de la profession de critique d'art associée à la plasticité du mot « morale » permet donc à ce travail de proposer une définition de la peinture victorienne et de ses acteurs. / By shifting the traditional issues - those of strictly national analyses - this thesis proposes to explore, using a comparative perspective, the importance given to the moral criterion by critics, French and English, when receiving Victorian painting. The corpus of this work is based on the successive study of English paintings presented at the “Expositions universelles” in Paris (1855, 1867, 1878 and 1889) as well as at the Royal Academy, and of the critical comments published in the press specialized or not. This approach reveals the dynamics of intercultural exchanges between the two countries around the moral issue and highlights the existence of a nationalist reception of art by critics. Consequently, a critic's judgment of a painting depends on their culture, their taste, but also more broadly on the social context and the principles specific to their society. As such, the competitive climate between France and England is reflected in the articles and books published on both sides of the English Channel. Powerful critical debates highlight the processes of appropriation and rejection that contribute to the definition of the two artistic cultures in relation to each other. They bring art and morality together by questioning the existence of a Victorian “grand genre”, the exhibition as a place for critics to circumscribe a national art and define themselves, as well as John Ruskin's (1819-1901) moralist influence on society and the art it produces. The heterogeneity of the art criticism profession associated with the plasticity of the word “moral” therefore allows this work to propose a definition of Victorian painting and its actors.

The dissertation examines the reception of Czech and European abstract art in Czechoslovakia in the 1920s and 1930s. It assumes that the Czechoslovak cultural milieu was unfavourable for abstract art at that time, yet various forms of its reception were occurring. Thus, the objective is to demonstrate and document opportunities for abstract art public presentation, related critical reactions and theoretical reflection. The reception history perspective followed in the dissertation deals with written sources, and focuses on relationship between viewers and abstract art and on handling particular artworks. Predominantly recipients such as theorists, art critics, editors, artists, and other participants in the arts sector are taken into consideration when exploring contemporaneous exhibiting, evaluation and interpretation of abstract art. The paper includes responses and attitudes to abstract painting and sculpture as well as to abstract photography, film and kinetic art.

No description available.

En 1946, la parution à New York de l’Histoire de l’impressionnisme de John Rewald consacra l’aura d’une historiographie scientifique du mouvement, cautionnée par un investissement documentaire. Cette qualité l’opposait à un monde profane, dominé par une tradition orale et en particulier la réputation de certains témoignages. Un examen attentif ne saurait pourtant donner raison au postulat d’une nature exclusivement savante du document. Une documentation impressionniste se constitua en effet, dès le début du XXe siècle, par l’intermédiaire de producteurs hétéroclites, artistes, témoins, héritiers, critiques, journalistes, aussi bien qu’historiens professionnels, conservateurs et universitaires. Elle peut ainsi être envisagée autant comme le fruit d’une quête de la vérité factuelle que comme l’appropriation d’un objet d’étude populaire, à travers ses empreintes écrites et visuelles. L’appareillage des lectures de l’impressionnisme réunit de la sorte : les autographes ; les memorabilia, meubles ou immeubles chargés du souvenir des peintres ; les technologies photographique et cinématographique. Ces documents participaient en outre d’une culture visuelle plus vaste, incluant les monuments et les plaques commémoratives dans l’espace public, ou encore les motifs transformés par l’acte pictural en points de vue remarquables. L’étude historique et critique de l’écriture de l’histoire impressionniste comme (dé)monstration documentaire permet de revenir sur les circonstances sociales et visuelles de sa mise en œuvre, sur les enjeux de carrière auxquels elle participa, et sur les missions qui lui furent assignées au sein de différents discours sur l’art, savants et profanes. / In 1946 the publication of John Rewald’s History of Impressionism in New York consecrated the aura of the movement’s scientific historiography, supported by documentary investment. This quality confronted laymen’s narratives, which oral tradition and some witness’s accounts’ reputations dominated. Yet, a close consideration could not agree with the assumption of an exclusive scholarly nature of the document. Since the beginning of the 20th century, varied producers, such as artists, witnesses, heirs, critics, journalists, as well as professional historians, museum curators and academics formed an impressionist documentation. It thus can be interpreted as a quest for factual truth, as much as an appropriation of a research object through its written and visual marks. The equipment of impressionist readings hence gathered are: autographs; memorabilia, movable and physical assets as souvenirs of artists; photographic and cinematographic technologies. Moreover, these documents fit into a broader visual culture which included monuments and commemorative plaques of the public sphere, or motives transformed by pictorial acts into remarkable viewpoints. A historical and critical study of such a writing of history as documentary (de)monstration allows here to look back to its execution’s social and visual contexts, the career issues in which it participated, the goals that had been assigned to it within both scholars’ and laymen’s art discourses.

The thesis examines the 9th Congress and 18th General Assembly of the International Association of Art Critics (AICA) organized in Czechoslovakia in September and October 1966. The main aim of the research is not only to reflect on the title themes of the meeting (The Essence of Art Criticism, The Functions of Art Criticism, The Methodology and Practice of the Profession of Critics), but also to shed some light on the circumstances surrounding the development of exhibitions commissioned for the congress, framing them in a perspective that acknowledges the active role of the event in shaping their ultimate role. To provide proper context, the thesis discusses also the further activities of the Czechoslovak Section (the time frame is concentrated on developments from 1945 to the first half of the 1970s). Furthermore, by turning the attention to the debates that took place within a divided Europe, the aim is to take into consideration the subtleties of viewpoints and interactions that were played out on the frontline of the Cold War and to document an elaborate web of connectivity that came about through a series of personal encounters.

Notre thèse envisage le rapport entre critique d’art et expression poétique dans l’œuvre de Bernard Noël. Elle comprend trois parties qui articulent sa prose d’idées artistiques avec son imaginaire et sa lyrique du regard et du corps.Dans un souci de représentativité, notre recherche suit certaines thématiques significatives traversant l’œuvre de Bernard Noël, de la critique d’art à la poésie. Les deux parties liminaires se fondent sur une sélection de critiques d’art. Dans la première, les écrits sur Ramón Alejandro et François Lunven donnent l’occasion de retracer la généalogie de la littérature d’art chez Bernard Noël. Sont ensuite traitées les critiques relatives à Magritte, Matisse et Masson, qui se révèlent fondamentales pour le parcours poétique de l’auteur. Sont enfin envisagées, à travers les textes sur Télémaque, Klasen, Debré et Wou-Ki, la figuration et l’abstraction, ces mouvements aux antipodes l’un de l’autre. La deuxième partie de la thèse fait dialoguer critique d’art et poétique. La progression de l’analyse permet alors de reprendre à nouveaux frais certains acquis de la section précédente. Les critiques consacrées à Moninot, à Fred Deux, à Moreau, à David et à Géricault sont rapportées de façon plus spécifique aux éléments qui constituent la poétique personnelle de l’auteur (représentation du corps, opposition corps-esprit, correspondances entre peinture et écriture). La pratique poétique de Bernard Noël fait l’objet de la troisième partie : il s’agit non seulement d’y déceler les modes d’expression versifiée du regard, notamment dans les poèmes inspirés par des œuvres plastiques (graphiques, picturales ou sculpturales), mais encore d’y relever les principes de collaboration régissant les livres de dialogue avec les artistes contemporains. Ce faisant, le prisme de la poétique de Bernard Noël permet d’interroger la notion de réalisme dans la peinture française, la période surréaliste, l’abstraction d’après-guerre, ou encore le mouvement de la nouvelle figuration.Notre corpus, qui ne se prétend pas exhaustif, est constitué de monographies de peintres significatives, tout autant que de textes issus de catalogues d’expositions. Il comporte des poèmes d’art et des livres à figures, tant il est vrai que la place de la peinture et de la sculpture est centrale dans l’œuvre de Bernard Noël. Son rapport à l’art conditionne, en effet, sa relation existentielle, esthétique, voire politique, à la société comme au monde. / Our thesis contemplates the connection between art criticism and poetic expression in the work of Bernard Noël. This thesis is articulated in three parts and it analyses how the prose d'idées artistiques of the poet is melted with his imaginary and his lyrics of eyes and body.Our research is led by a representativeness intent and it follows some significant thematic through the work of Bernard Noël. The two preliminary parts are based on a selection of art criticism. In the first part the writings about Ramon Alejandro and François Luven give us the opportunity to go back to the genealogy in Bernard Noël work. In the same part we examine the critics regarding Magritte, Matisse and Masson which turned out crucial to the author's poetic process. Then we contemplate, through the texts about Télémaque, Klasen, Debré and Wou-Ki, figuration end abstraction as movements one opposite to the other. The second part of the thesis engages art criticism and poetic. The progression of the analysis allows to recall some issues of the previous section.The critics addressed to Moninot, Fred Deux, Moreau, David and Géricault are treated in a more specific way to and mixed with elements which constitute author’s personal poetic (body representation, body and mind opposition, painting-writing connection). Bernard Noël's poetic practice is the subject of the third part: here we try to reveal not only the versified expressions use, especially in the poems inspired by plastic art works (graphics, paintings or sculpture), but also the principles of collaboration which stand above the books of dialogue with the contemporary artists.Through the analysis of the work of Bernard Noël we can examine the concept of realism in the french painting, the surrealist period, the abstraction movement after the war or the new figuration movement.Our corpus, which claims not to be exhaustive, is made by monographs of important painters and by texts of exposition catalogues. It includes art, poems and figure books since it is true that the place of painting and sculpture it’s central in Bernard Noël’s work as his relationship with art which influences his existence, aesthetics, even political view of society and of the world.