Submitted by Fabio Sobreira Campos da Costa (fabio.sobreira@ufpe.br) on 2016-08-12T13:22:21Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) DISSERTAÇÃO - ASLAN RODRIGUES.pdf: 1170400 bytes, checksum: 321be99da8f172d56a927b3ec197ab1c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-12T13:22:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) DISSERTAÇÃO - ASLAN RODRIGUES.pdf: 1170400 bytes, checksum: 321be99da8f172d56a927b3ec197ab1c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-08-31 / A presente dissertação tem por escopo analisar a pertinência e a existência jurídica – ou não – de danos extrapatrimoniais transindividuais, bem como a consequente responsabilização civil em caso de sua ocorrência. Essa análise será regida à sombra dos principais pressupostos teóricos da doutrina do direito civil na legalidade constitucional. A razão da escolha desta temática está assentada na atual necessidade de se aumentar o debate sobre a existência desta modalidade de dano, bem como as repercussões jurídicas e sociais em caso de sua ocorrência. A doutrina e a jurisprudência brasileiras ainda não consolidaram um entendimento a respeito desse novo enfoque jurídico. Trata-se de um tema controverso, germinado em meio aos avanços tecnológicos, aos meios de comunicação em massa e ao acelerado processo de globalização, que impuseram profundas mudanças sociais, ampliando a conceituação jurídica do dano extrapatrimonial. Serão debatidos os argumentos favoráveis e contrários à aceitação desta modalidade de danos. Por fim, será realizada uma análise crítica dos dois últimos recursos especiais, julgados pelo STJ, que tratam da temática estudada; apontando o atual entendimento da Corte Superior sobre o assunto. / This dissertation is to analyze the relevance and scope of the legal existence - or not - of trans-balance-sheet damage, and the consequent civil liability in the event of their occurrence. This analysis will be governed in the shadow of the main theoretical assumptions of the doctrine of civil law in constitutional legality. The reason for choosing this subject is seated on the current need to increase the debate about the existence of this type of damage, as well as the legal and social consequences in the event of their occurrence. The doctrine and Brazilian courts have not consolidated an understanding about this new legal approach. This is a controversial topic, sprouted amid the technological advances, the media en masse and the accelerated process of globalization, which imposed deep social changes, expanding the legal concept of off-balance sheet damage. The arguments for and against the acceptance of this type of damage will be discussed. Finally, a critical analysis of the last two special features will be held, judged by the Supreme Court, dealing with the studied subject; pointing the current understanding of the Superior Court on the matter.

L’autonomie de la responsabilité administrative en matière extra-contractuelle n’est plus forcément acquise aujourd’hui. La multiplication des sources de la responsabilité administrative, à côté de la jurisprudence, qu’elles soient internes ou supranationales, a eu pour effet de rouvrir ce débat. Incontestablement, l’autonomie est encore aujourd’hui une réalité. Cependant, la loi, expression de la volonté générale, et ce en dépit de ses bienfaits, tend à effriter un principe jadis solide. Il semblerait que malgré sa légitimité, ses effets bénéfiques pour les victimes, et sa complémentarité à certains moments avec la jurisprudence, le législateur, avec le consentement du juge constitutionnel, a la possibilité de déroger au principe de la séparation des autorités. D’autres sources, comme le droit de la Convention E.D.H., tendent à imposer un cadre juridique prédéfini sans prendre en compte le dualisme juridictionnel français. Parallèlement, la Cour de justice à créer à destination des États membres un véritable droit commun de la responsabilité en matière extra-contractuelle. Tous ces facteurs conjugués, sans oublier aujourd’hui le contentieux de l’environnement impactant les règles de la responsabilité administrative, nous laisse penser que la frontière entre le droit public et le droit privé devient de plus en plus perméable. Parfois, l’autonomie, qui est selon nous la liberté du juge administratif d’appliquer des règles qui se distinguent ou non de la responsabilité civile, n’est plus toujours opérante. En effet, les sources évoquées génèrent parfois un cadre juridique standard. À certains moments, c’est la compétence du juge administratif qui est remise en cause au profit du juge judiciaire au nom du principe d’une bonne administration de la justice. / The autonomy of the administrative responsibility in extra-contractual is not necessarily acquired any more today. The multiplication of the springs of the administrative responsibility, next to the jurisprudence, that they are internal or supranational, had the effect of reopening this debate. Unmistakably, the autonomy is even today a reality. However, the law, the expression of the general will, and it in spite of its benefactions, tends to crumble a principle formerly solid. It would seem that in spite of his legitimacy, his beneficial effects for the victims, and his complementarity at times with the jurisprudence, the legislator, with the consent of the constitutional judge, has the possibility of breaking the principle of the separation of the authorities. In other springs, as the right of the Convention E.D.H., tend to impose a legal framework predefined without taking into account the French jurisdictional dualism. At the same time, the Court of justice to create aimed at Member states a real common law of the responsibility in extra-contractual material. All these combined factors, without forgetting the dispute of the environment today impacting on the rules of the administrative responsibility, lets us think that the border between the public law and the private law becomes more and more permeable. Sometimes, the autonomy, which is according to us the freedom of the administrative judge to apply rules which distinguish themselves or not from the civil liability, is not effective anymore yet. Indeed, the evoked sources sometimes generate a standard legal framework. At times, it is the competence of the administrative judge that is questioned for the benefit of the judicial judge in the name of the principle of a good administration of the justice.

59 Civil Responsibility on Skiing Slopes Abstract This diploma thesis deals with civil liability on skiing slopes. Besides gathering valid standards in the Czech Republic, it also provides insight into foreign legal systems with the greatest emphasis on the French regulation and legal system. A part of the thesis is devoted to the rules of the International Ski Federation, which are widely respected important source of rules in skiing. Examples of their application are illustrated with the case law that inferred their validity, while in other countries the rules were reflected directly in legislation. In the first chapter there is a general anchoring of responsibility in Czech civil law, followed by a brief excursion into the sports law of individual sports, in the third chapter we find a summary of legal and non-legal regulations that apply to activities on domestic skiing slopes, including a bill that in the end did not pass in the Chamber of Deputies. The FIS rules of conduct are introduced by the story of their genesis and international cooperation on their final wording, followed by an official commentary issued by the International Ski Federation for the reason of clarification and interpretation. In the fourth chapter follows the analysis of the application of FIS rules by judicial authorities using...

L’énergie nucléaire a toujours suscité la polémique. Alors que certains considèrent qu’une énergie nucléaire « sûre » pourrait contribuer à assurer à la fois une meilleure sécurité des approvisionnements énergétiques et une réduction des émissions mondiales de gaz à effet de serre, d’autres lui reprochent plusieurs types de risques et particulièrement les accidents nucléaires, la gestion des déchets nucléaires, la non-prolifération et les attaques terroristes ou même militaires contre les installations nucléaires civiles. En réalité, le retour d’expérience des accidents nucléaires les plus catastrophique de l’histoire, Three Mile Island (États-Unis) en 1979, Tchernobyl (ancienne URSS) en 1986 et Fukushima Daiichi (Japon) en 2011, a montré que des accidents nucléaires graves peuvent avoir des effets divers d’une portée potentiellement considérable, (très souvent transfrontières), à la fois pour les personnes, les biens et pour l’environnement. L’accident de Fukushima a confirmé une fois de plus la nécessité d’améliorer les règles existantes du droit international de l’énergie nucléaire, de manière à mettre en place un régime mondial de responsabilité civile du fait nucléaire, répondant aux préoccupations de tous les États qui pourraient être touchés par ce type d’accident. Le défit aujourd’hui est, donc, degarantir une réparation efficace, équitable et harmonisée des différents types de dommages issus d’un accident survenant dans une installation nucléaire. / Nuclear energy always caused the polemic. Whereas some consider that a “sure” nuclear energy could contribute to ensure at the same time a better safety of the energy supplies and a reduction of the greenhouses gas emissions, others reproach its several types of risks, particularly, the nuclear accidents, the nuclear waste control, the non-proliferation and the terrorist attacks or even armed against civil nuclear installations. Actually, return of the experience of the most catastrophic nuclear accidents in history (Three Mile Island (the United States) in 1979, Tchernobyl (former USSR) in 1986 and FukushimaDaiichi (Japan) in 2011), showed that serious nuclear accidents can have a variety of potentially far-reaching effects (very often transboundary) for people, property and the environment. The Fukushima accident confirmed once again the need to improve the existing rules of international nuclear energy law to put in place a global nuclear liability regime that addresses all of the states that may be affected by a nuclear accident. Today’s challenge is, therefore, to guarantee an efficient, fair and harmonized repair of the different types of damage resulting from an accident occurring in a nuclear installation.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:26:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ednara Pontes de Avelar.pdf: 3638438 bytes, checksum: d428a166ce582692b6dcb5176bc52a9c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-03-12 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / The present work aims to research the medical civil responsibility due to the techniques of assisted human reproduction. To face the subject, it initially makes a brief study of the medical aspects of those procedures. Soon after, it analyzes their main juridical implications, such as: the destiny of the exceeding embryos; the gestation contract by somebody else; the donor s anonymity and the right to the genetic identity. Since then, it develops the central theme of the work, going by the examination of the incidence of the Code of Consumer s Defense in the relationships doctor-patient; of the nature of the obligation assumed by the doctor in those contracts of rendering of services: if of mean or of result; of the importance of the informed consent in the assisted procreation. It still searches the general aspects of the medical mistake, of the medical blame and of the medical damage, for in succession to treat the specific aspects of the recovery duty by the doctors, of the clinics of assisted human reproduction and of the banks of deposit of fertilizing material. At the end, it appreciates hypothetical cases that were presented to law operators, in order to have their opinions / O presente trabalho objetiva pesquisar a responsabilidade civil médica decorrente das técnicas de reprodução humana assistida. Para o enfrentamento da questão, faz inicialmente um breve estudo dos aspectos médicos desses procedimentos. Em seguida, analisa as principais implicações jurídicas deles decorrentes, tais como: o destino dos embriões excedentários; o contrato de gestação por outrem; o anonimato do doador e o direito à identidade genética. A partir daí, desenvolve o tema central do trabalho, passando pelo exame da incidência do Código de Defesa do Consumidor nas relações médicopaciente; da natureza da obrigação assumida pelo médico nesses contratos de prestação de serviço: se de meio ou de resultado; da importância do consentimento informado na procriação assistida. Perscruta ainda os aspectos gerais do erro médico, da culpa médica e do dano médico, para em sucessão tratar dos aspectos específicos do dever de ressarcimento por parte dos médicos, das clínicas de reprodução humana assistida e dos bancos de depósito de material fertilizante. Por fim, aprecia casos hipotéticos que foram apresentados a operadores do direito para a obtenção de pareceres

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ana Paula Cazarini Ribas de Oliveira.pdf: 917745 bytes, checksum: 349021c52a86f3e4e8e51d7761e20155 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-05-21 / This work for the Master´s degree has the aim of analyzing the topic of the parents´ responsibility for the damage caused by their children under majority. It is based on the Civil Code from 2002 that introduced two important changes: the straight responsibility of parents and in case they are not able of doing it or do not have enough possessions for satisfying this duty, the law hold responsible the incapable for the compliance with the obligation for the reparation of the victim. Such changes concerning the constitutional principles of the human being´s dignity, solidarity, equality, liberty and psychophysics integrity, the principle of the whole reparation for the damage suffered by the victim and the principle of the whole protection of the rights for the minor, according to the Child and the Teenage Statute combine with the aim of the general civil responsibility, allow the law to give the rules, that the matter is based on, a different comprehension concerning its content and covering. It is said that parents are responsible by the damage caused by their minor children because they were given cause, therefore they must afford the duty that might appear, independently of their marital status whether they are married (the fact or the right), separated, divorced or even if they were removed from the family power or whether it had been suspended. In any case, there will be solidarity between parents for the compliance with the obligation for the reparation. In this context, hypotheses that move away the parents´ responsibility are reduced. The chances of the victim to obtain the reparation for the damage suffered increase at the same time that there is the guarantee for more protection to the minor who might have his own property reached in case parents neither answer to the obligation of the reparation nor are responsible for it / Esta dissertação de mestrado tem por escopo analisar o instituto da responsabilidade civil dos pais pelos danos causados por seus filhos menores sob o enfoque do Código Civil de 2002, que introduziu, nesta seara, duas importantes modificações: fixou a responsabilidade objetiva dos pais e responsabilizou o incapaz pelo cumprimento da obrigação de reparar a vítima, caso os pais não sejam responsáveis ou não tenham bens suficientes para satisfazer esta obrigação. Tais alterações, associadas aos princípios constitucionais da dignidade da pessoa humana, da solidariedade, da igualdade, da liberdade e da integridade psicofísica; ao princípio da reparação integral do dano sofrido pela vítima e ao princípio da proteção integral dos direitos do menor, fixados pelo Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente, combinados com a finalidade da responsabilidade civil geral, permitem atribuir às regras que regem a matéria uma interpretação diferente quanto ao seu conteúdo e alcance. Sustenta-se que os pais são responsáveis pelos danos causados por seus filhos menores porque lhes deram causa, devendo suportar os ônus daí decorrentes, independentemente do estado civil, ou seja, se casados (de fato ou de direito), separados ou divorciados entre si e ainda que sejam destituídos do poder familiar ou tenham este poder suspenso. Em qualquer desses casos haverá solidariedade, entre os pais, pelo cumprimento da obrigação de reparar. Neste contexto, as hipóteses que afastam a responsabilidade dos pais são reduzidas, aumentam as chances de a vítima obter a reparação de seu dano, integralmente, ao mesmo tempo em que se garante maior proteção ao menor, que poderá ter seu próprio patrimônio alcançado se os pais não satisfizerem a obrigação de reparar ou não forem por ela responsabilizados

Submitted by JOSIANE SANTOS DE OLIVEIRA (josianeso) on 2017-06-23T12:48:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dimitrius Boatini_.pdf: 1175657 bytes, checksum: 8cf2ab094f0559a8e82d1b550209f300 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-23T12:48:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dimitrius Boatini_.pdf: 1175657 bytes, checksum: 8cf2ab094f0559a8e82d1b550209f300 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-07 / Nenhuma / O trabalho estuda o tão polêmico conceito de ativismo judicial, sujeito a inúmeras definições, mas aqui entendido como a ingerência do poder judiciário nas áreas de competências precípuas dos poderes legislativo e executivo, em conjunção com a responsabilidade civil do estado por omissão inconstitucional no que tange aos direitos fundamentais, em especial, no que diz respeito a um dos principais desdobramentos da nova responsabilidade civil; o nexo causal presumido. Para isso um primeiro capítulo será dedicado em estudar de maneira central em relação à responsabilidade civil, não somente em seu contexto histórico e tradicional, mas com todos os desdobramentos da atualidade que surgem como uma complexidade a mais tão somente passível de ser resolvida com a via do ativismo judicial. O segundo capítulo envolverá todas as conceituações, críticas e argumentos a favor do ativismo judicial, bem como a definição de seu conceito para efeitos deste trabalho; além da análise dos mais diversos casos práticos da jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Se evidencia uma necessidade de ativismo judicial para a satisfação dos direitos fundamentais, amparado por ampla doutrina, porém, com uma série de parâmetros que possibilitem que o mesmo seja utilizado de maneira adequada; como a diferenciação entre o juízo de probabilidade do nexo causal presumido e a teoria do risco integral, utilização da teoria da causa eficiente em detrimento da mais tradicional teoria da causa direta e imediata utilizada pelo Judiciário nacional, e o maior auto-comedimento do Judiciário nos casos envolvendo um confronto de direitos fundamentais. / The essay is about the controversial figure of Judicial Activism, that is defined under a wide array of concepts, but here will be treated as the judiciary acting on the legislative and executive competencies, in conjunction with the civil responsibility of the state for unconstitutional omissions on the fundamental rights, especially with the one of the most relevant new consequences from the civil responsibility in its new figure, the assumed causal link. For this to happen, the first chapter will study the civil responsibility in a deep and thoughful manner, not only on its traditional and historical scope, but also with the contemporary events that unfold and change the law in a way that only judicial activism can bring an answer to it. The second chapter will bring all the concepts and positions about the judicial activism, besides define what is the concept that this essay will use. The essay ends with the idea that the judicial activism is necessary for the fulfilling of the fundamental rights, such as numerous authors had already advocated, but theres a wide array of guidelines created for it to be used in an adequated manner, like, being able to differentiate the probability judgement from the assumed causal link theory from the full risk theory from the state, the use of the theory of the efficient cause instead of the direct and immediate cause, and a bigger use of the judiciary self-restraint when the case in question brings a clash from fundamental rights.

Submitted by JOSÉ ESTEVAM DE ALMEIDA PRADO (jeap@jeap.com.br) on 2018-09-17T12:44:09Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Estevam Prado - Dissertação final.pdf: 2266670 bytes, checksum: 312ab5780824b82a4f6e4f41f29aef17 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Joana Martorini (joana.martorini@fgv.br) on 2018-09-17T17:36:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Estevam Prado - Dissertação final.pdf: 2266670 bytes, checksum: 312ab5780824b82a4f6e4f41f29aef17 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Suzane Guimarães (suzane.guimaraes@fgv.br) on 2018-09-18T13:58:14Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Estevam Prado - Dissertação final.pdf: 2266670 bytes, checksum: 312ab5780824b82a4f6e4f41f29aef17 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-18T13:58:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Estevam Prado - Dissertação final.pdf: 2266670 bytes, checksum: 312ab5780824b82a4f6e4f41f29aef17 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-08-21 / A presente dissertação tem por objetivo estudar a reparação de danos sofridos no mercado de valores mobiliários causados por divulgação de informações falsas ou enganosas. Partindo do papel da informação na formação dos preços de valores mobiliários, e dos danos que pode causar a divulgação de informação falsa ou enganosa, analisamos o tema sob a ótica da responsabilidade civil. O tema tem sido pouco explorado em nosso país até então, e apenas recentemente tem despertado maior atenção em virtude de ações privadas propostas por investidores no exterior em face de importantes companhias aberta brasileiras, com algum desdobramento em nosso país. Para expandir o nosso conhecimento, realizamos pesquisa de direito comparado examinando o tratamento dado nos Estados Unidos e na França aos casos de informação falsa ou enganosa no mercado de valores mobiliários. Verificamos as diferenças existentes e as barreiras à efetiva reparação de danos no mercado de valores mobiliários, concluindo que, embora os tribunais desses países demonstrem disposição de tutelar os interesses lesados, a reparação tem sido ficta. Identificamos como questão problemática a responsabilização da companhia emissora, pois nesse caso não há de fato reparação de danos, mas, sim, a socialização de prejuízos, embora isso possa ser contornado ou mitigado por meio de seguro de responsabilidade e/ou criação de fundo de reparação de danos no mercado de valores mobiliários. / The present dissertation aims to study the repair of damages suffered in the securities market caused by the disclosure of false or misleading information by public companies. Based on the role of information in the formation of securities prices, and the damages that may be caused by the dissemination of false or misleading information, we analyze the issue from a civil liability perspective. The issue has received little attention so far in our country, and only recently has it attracted more attention due to private actions filed by investors abroad in the face of important Brazilian public companies, with some development in our country. To further our knowledge, we conduct comparative law research by examining the treatment given in the United States and France to cases of false or misleading information in the securities market. We have verified the existing differences and barriers to the effective compensation of damages in the securities market, concluding that, although the courts of these countries have shown willingness in protecting the injured interests, reparation has been elusive. We identified the liability of the issuing company as a problematic issue, because in this case there is in fact no compensation of damages, but, rather, the socialization of losses, although this may be overcome or mitigated by means of civil liability insurance and/or creation of a compensation fund for damages in the securities market.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:26:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Luis Fernando de Freitas Penteado.pdf: 691795 bytes, checksum: 803fd93930323302ac5d26921cf12a66 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-10-08 / Although the problem related to the weather change has been widespread only in the last decades, it is not recent the concern of the international community in the adoption of measures for the mitigation of this change in the ecosystem balance. The Kyoto Protocol, however, comes as the concrete awareness of the need of acting towards the reduction of the greenhouse effect, which causes such changes in our weather, noticed, mainly, through the global warming. The main means designed by that international treaty is the possibility of compensating the emissions of the gases accountable for the greenhouse effect (GEG Greenhouse Effect Gases), which is possible only through the transaction of the Credits of Emission Reduction - CERs, commonly known as Carbon Credits. Its example was followed, individually, by several other countries, being its idea adopted, even by Brazil, most accurately by São Paulo Estate, which improved its concept in the reduction of the concentration in the atmosphere of some polluting gases and of particulated material. However, a lot is asked about the compatibility of the above mentioned Protocol inside the principles and main regulations of our Environmental Law, and also, about what would be the environmental civil responsibility of the people engaged in the projects, related to a possible not fulfilling of the reduction of the emissions, as declared in each case. In this paper, we will demonstrate the perfect compatibility among the projects that give rise to the getting of the Credits of Reduced Atmospheric Emissions and our main laws related to the environment protection, as well as to the Environmental Law Principles. Finally, we will also, as an important part of this paper, analyses the environmental civil responsibility of the people in charge of keeping the commitments made when a project is implemented, aiming at obtaining the Credits of the Reduced Atmospheric Emissions / Apesar de somente nas últimas décadas o problema relativo às mudanças climáticas ter ganhado a repercussão que lhe é devida, não é de agora a preocupação da Comunidade Internacional na adoção de medidas para mitigação dessa alteração ao equilíbrio ecossistêmico. O Protocolo de Quioto representa a concretização da necessidade de se agir de modo a reduzir o chamado efeito estufa, causador de tais mudanças em nosso clima, sentidas, principalmente, com o aquecimento global. O principal instrumento idealizado por este Tratado Internacional encontra-se na possibilidade de se compensar as emissões dos gases responsáveis pelo efeito estufa (GEE Gases de Efeito Estufa), ato que é possível apenas via transação das Certidões de Redução de Emissões - RCEs, popularmente conhecidas como Créditos de Carbono. Seu exemplo foi seguido ainda individualmente, por outros diversos países, chegando sua idéia a ser adotada inclusive pelo Brasil, mais precisamente pelo Estado de São Paulo, que aprimorou seu conceito na redução da concentração na atmosfera de alguns gases poluentes e de material particulado. Entretanto, muito se questiona doutrinariamente acerca da compatibilidade do referido instrumento com nosso Direito Ambiental, princípios e principais normas, e ainda sobre qual seria a responsabilidade civil ambiental daqueles envolvidos nos projetos, frente a um eventual não cumprimento da redução das emissões, conforme declarado em cada caso. Demonstrar-se-á, ao longo do texto, a perfeita compatibilidade entre os projetos que dão ensejo à obtenção dos Créditos de Emissões Atmosféricas Reduzidas e as nossas principais leis relativas à proteção do meio ambiente, bem como aos princípios de Direito Ambiental. Por fim, sendo ainda o foco principal do presente estudo, será analisada a responsabilidade civil ambiental dos responsáveis pela manutenção dos compromissos acordados quando da implementação de um projeto visando à obtenção dos Créditos de Emissões Atmosféricas Reduzidas

Ce travail essaie d’analyser l’affirmation courante dans la dogmatique brésilienne de ce que les règles de la responsabilité civile objective sont destinées à concrétiser la valeur de la solidarité sociale inscrite dans la Constitution Fédérale du Brésil (article 3, III, in fine) et la directrice de la socialité présente dans le Code Civil de 2002. L’étude commence par la description d’un risque social – la criminalité urbaine violente – et par la présentation de la relation entre une certaine forme historique de manifestation de ce risque et de l’augmentation des cas judiciaires concernant la responsabilité des entreprises de transport urbain pour dommages subis par leurs passagers à cause d’actes violents pratiqués par des tiers lors du trajet. Dans la deuxième partie, on présente les origines du discours de solidarisme juridique et les influences de celui-là sur certaines constructions dogmatiques concernant le phénomène de la responsabilité civile. Finalement, ayant pour base des recherches menées à propos de la jurisprudence de deux tribunaux supérieurs brésiliens (le Supremo Tribunal Federal et le Superior Tribunal de Justiça) on analyse le fond de ces décisions, essayant d’identifier à quel point le discours théorique de la dogmatique est effectivement incorporé au moment de l’application des concepts juridiques implicite dans certains problèmes concrets. / O presente trabalho pretende analisar a afirmação corrente, na dogmática civilística brasileira, de que as regras da responsabilidade civil objetiva se destinam a concretizar o valor da solidariedade social inscrito na Constituição Federal (art. 3º, III, in fine) e a diretriz da socialidade presente no Código Civil de 2002. O estudo é feito, inicialmente, por meio da descrição de um risco social – criminalidade urbana violenta – e da apresentação da relação entre uma determinada forma histórica de manifestação desse risco e o aumento dos casos judiciais envolvendo a responsabilidade das empresas de transporte urbano em face de danos sofridos por seus passageiros em razão de atos violentos praticados por terceiros durante o trajeto. Em um segundo momento, são apresentadas as origens do discurso do solidarismo jurídico e as influências desse sobre certas construções dogmáticas relativas ao fenômeno da responsabilidade civil. Por fim, com base em pesquisa realizada sobre a jurisprudência dos dois tribunais superiores brasileiros (Supremo Tribunal Federal e Superior Tribunal de Justiça), realizou-se a análise de conteúdo das decisões, buscando identificar em que medida o discurso teórico da dogmática é efetivamente incorporado no momento da aplicação dos conceitos jurídicos implicados no tratamento de determinados problemas concretos. / This text aims at analyzing the current belief held by the authors of the Brazilian dogmatic of civil law, that rules concerning objective civil responsibility must realize the value of social solidarity described by the Federal Constitution (Article 3, III, in fine) and the principle of sociality presented by the Civil Code of 2002. The study is done initially through the description of a social risk – violent urban criminality – and the presentation of a relationship between a certain historical form this risk takes and the increase in legal cases involving the responsibility of public transportation companies for damage incurred upon their passengers due to violent acts practiced by third parties on the itinerary. In the second part, we present the origins of the discourse of legal solidarism, and its influence upon certain dogmatic constructions concerning the phenomenon of civil responsibility. Finally, based on research done about the jurisprudence of two Brazilian superior tribunals (the Supremo Tribunal Federal and the Superior Tribunal de Justiça), we analyze the contents of those decisions, aiming at identifying to what extent the theoretical discourse of dogmatic is actually incorporated into the moment of applying the legal concepts implicit in the treatment of certain concrete problems.