A presente pesquisa objetiva identificar a natureza jurídica do instituto do consentimento do ofendido para o direito penal brasileiro atual, evidenciando o papel da vítima. Para tanto, inicia-se a pesquisa com uma análise sobre o ofendido, estabelecendo sua evolução histórica, seu conceito atual, bem como os conceitos de vitimologia e vitimodogmática. Logo, aborda-se o consentimento propriamente dito, determinando seu histórico, seu conceito, seu objeto (bem jurídico disponível), seus requisitos e diferenças em relação à autocolocação da vítima em risco. Em seguida, verifica-se o estado atual da questão da natureza jurídica do consentimento. Parte-se da legislação brasileira e do entendimento doutrinário atual. Em razão da predominância do entendimento pela causa de justificação, os fundamentos histórico dogmáticos do conceito material de antijuridicidade são verificados. Ainda no campo da análise da natureza jurídica, fundamental a análise da questão da tipicidade (formal e substancial) pressuposto da antijuridicidade. Assim, analisa-se o consentimento do ofendido como causa de exclusão da tipicidade material. Tendo em vista a teoria unitária, busca-se afastar a diferenciação entre o consentimento e o acordo. Na sequência, trata-se do direito comparado. Assim, torna-se possível a análise do consentimento do ofendido no direito penal brasileiro, tendo em vista a legislação penal em vigor. / This paper aims to identify the legal institute of the need for the offended persons consent for the current Brazilian criminal law, highlighting the role of the victim. To this effect, the study begins with an analysis of victims rights, establishing their historical evolution, the current concept, as well as the concepts of victimology and victim dogmatism (a branch that studies the behavior of crime victims and their contribution to the occurrence of the event, as well as the repercussion of that participation on setting the penalty imposed on the perpetrator). Then it examines consent itself, determining its history, concept, object (alienable rights), the requirements and differences in relation to the victims self-exposure to risk. Next it describes the current state of the legal nature of the consent question based on Brazilian legislation and the interpretation of legal scholars. Because of the predominant position regarding cause for justification, dogmatic historical foundations of the material concept of material illegality are addressed. Still in the field of the legal nature, it is fundamental to analyze the question of classification of the crime (formal and substantive), which is a presupposition for illegality. Therefore, consent of the offended person is analyzed as cause to exclude the classification of the act as a crime. Based on unitary theory, I argue against the distinction between consent and concurrence. Finally, the matter is examined from the perspective of comparative law, to analyze the issue of victims consent in current Brazilian criminal law.

La notion de « juridiction » au sens de l'art. 1 de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales est directement liée au problème plus ample de la mise en cause de la responsabilité des Etats contractants et, implicitement, au problème d'ordre procédural de la compétence de la Cour de Strasbourg. L'interdépendance de ces trois éléments a mené à une interprétation jurisprudentielle autonome du concept de «juridiction», qui reflète les efforts de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme de concilier les différents rôles dans lesquelles l'Etat évolue sur la scène internationale. Vu que la mission de la Cour est celle de protéger les droits individuels, le défit auquel l'instance de Strasbourg doit répondre est celui de privilégier le rôle de « garant des droits de l'homme » de l'Etat, sans provoquer un déséquilibre fonctionnel ou relationnel des Etats parties à la Convention. La frontière entre équilibre et déséquilibre n'étant pas fixe, le concept de « juridiction » fonctionne en tant qu'axe élastique d'orientation du comportement des Etats, théoriquement gouverné par le principe de la liberté d'action, mais pratiquement encadré par l'obligation de garantir les droits consacrés par la Convention. / The « jurisdiction » concept as provided by Art. 1 of the European convention for human rights is directly connected to the more complex topic of attracting the responsibility of the States - party to such Convention and, implicitly, to the procedural matter of Strasbourg Court's competence. The interconnection between these elements has lead to an autonomous case-law interpretation of the « jurisdiction » concept, evidencing the efforts of the European court for human rights to conciliate the various roles played by the States on the international scene. Taking into account that the mission of the Court is to protect individual rights, the challenge that the Strasbourg court is facing consists in emphasizing the State's role of « human rights guarantor » without creating functional or relational misbalances for the States – party to the Convention. Since the borderline between balance and misbalance is not a fix one, the « jurisdiction » concept functions as a variable orientation axis for the State's conduct, theoretically governed by the freedom of action principle, which in practice is bordered by the general obligation to guarantee the rights established in the Convention.

This thesis examines the connection between technological dependence of mankind and its attitudes towards it. The issue is to what extent technological change in the workplace is a generator of conflict or a creator of consensus? The subject of the study is the Swedish mining company LKAB during the period 1946-1987. The case study concentrates on the approaches to new technology by the local union leadership and the LKAB company management. The analysis is carried out through a classification scheme over job- functions, divided into four functional categories. The classification is ranging from manually inclined work on the end to highly automized work on the other pole. The results show a clear and unquestionable development of mechanization. At the next level of analysis the focus is on approaches and ways of relating mechanization by the two parties took on the question, and how this influenced the relationships between the two parties. The final results show that technological change in general is a creator of consensus. However, at the same time, techno­logical change is an unequeal process because the company commands control over three kinds of power resources; ownership, the legislative right of paragraph 32 and the monopoly of technological expertis. Organized labour can only try to attain technological knowledge and high levels of worker support. / digitalisering@umu

Syftet med studien är att undersöka biståndshandläggares handlingsutrymme i handläggningen av insatsen försöks- och träningslägenhet. Studien utgår från följande frågeställningar: Hur upplever biståndshandläggaren graden av frihet i sitt handlingsutrymme i bedömning av försöks- och träningslägenhet? Hur tillgodogör biståndshandläggaren klientens medverkan och önskemål i handläggningen av försöks- och träningslägenhet? Studien baseras på enskilda intervjuer som utgick ifrån en halvstrukturerad intervjuguide med sex stycken biståndshandläggare som arbetar inom socialpsykiatrins myndighetsutövandeverksamhet i Stockholms stad. Studiens resultat visade på att det inte finns någon motsättning mellan riktlinjerna och den individuella bedömning som alla klienter har rätt till, utan att handlingsutrymmet fyller ut riktlinjernas funktion. I alla fall när det gäller insatsen försöks- och träningslägenhet inom socialpsykiatrin i Stockholms stad. Studien kom också fram till att klientens kognitiva förmåga avgör hur mycket klienten medverkar i utredningen. Det outnyttjade handlingsutrymme hamnar hos biståndshandläggaren, som då får ett utökat handlingsutrymme. / The aim of this study was to investigate the freedom of action of the care managers in the handling of trial and training apartments. The study is based on the following questions: What level of freedom does the care managers experience in the assessment of trial and training apartments? How does the care manager create a good environment, taking into consideration the client's involvement and wishes, in the management of trial and training apartments? The study is based on individual interviews based on a semi-structured interview guide with six care managers working in the government-run social psychiatry organisation in the city of Stockholm. The results of the study showed that there is no contradiction between the guidelines and the individual assessment that all clients are entitled. In either case, when it comes to the trial and training apartments at the social psychiatry organisation in the city of Stockholm. The study also shows that the client's cognitive ability determines how much the client participates in the investigation. The unused space of action is given to the care manager, which then increases the scope of action.

The purpose of this study is to enlighten the sense and usage of knowledge in the context of social work. The study has a qualitative approach and is based on semi structured interviews with three social workers that are qualified and three other social workers whose work is bases on their experience as a former client. Earlier studies show that social workers in Sweden has mixed feelings about the usage of scientifically approved methods and theories in their practical work. They are more often referring to their individual experience rather than their education as their source of knowledge in their practical work regardless of educational background. My conclusion about the difference between qualified and unqualified social workers is that the educated social workers tend to work in organizations that more often demand a certain view and practical use of knowledge and that often results in trying to express themselves in line with the organization. Therefor it is hard to pinpoint exactly what their true thought about especially practical knowledge as a subject are. What appears to be the case with both qualified and unqualified social workers is that they tend to use themselves and their colleagues as a source of knowledge at the same time as they try to adapt to the cultures of their work. Furthermore, this study brings up relevant aspects of relation, freedom of action and organization and how they in some ways control and form the social work of these six individuals.

The main purpose of this study is to survey and reach an understanding of how the practical work in psychiatry at times depart from the organization’s stated formal structure. To find the material that would give us the answers we read the organizations own documents about the formal structures form and also we had five interviews. All the tutors are involved in one way or another with the psychiatric and the forensic process. .Job titles vary in order to access information from different parts of the process and get multiple perspectives.  The data was analyzed with sociological concepts and a more comprehensive theory. Some of the concepts are “formal structure”, “cooperation”, "the relationship between freedom and constraint” and “gräsrotsbyråkrater”. The theory that we used to examine the material is W. Meyer and Rowans theory about how the formal structure of an organization and business is only a myth and ceremony.  The result of the study indicates that a plurality of elements has an impact on why the difference between the formal structure and the practical process exists. The loose constraint leads to a wider freedom of action that gives a varied embodiment within the different workgroups. It becomes a habitual pattern in the practical process and the looks of the formal structure is not a priority. The practical process is not aligned with the formal structure and that causes problems. The cooperation is affected negatively and becomes inexplicit and the workgroups can form how the duties are done instead of the organizational management plan (the formal structure). That brings the opportunity to decide and claim that the own group does it better so cooperation partners is excluded in the practical process, when they actually are supposed to be included according to the formal structure.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bruna Oliveira Fernandes.pdf: 983404 bytes, checksum: e1dd33965dcbc148fb9808d360233356 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-09-24 / The tax obligation is compulsory and arises out of law, thus, on the taxable fact being carried out, the taxpayer cannot refuse to pay the charge or tax. Aiming to reduce the tax burden, many taxpayers have programmed their actions on a lawful basis in order to opt for the alternative conducts to the event of tax incidence, avoiding the occurrence of the taxable fact. This practice has been called tax avoidance or tax planning. Tax avoidance is not to be mistaken by tax evasion, which is an unlawful conduct to avoid the payment of the tax due. To avoid planning, which reduces tax revenue, the tax authorities and part of the doctrine or legal writings defend the possibility of disregarding the acts and alternative business so that one can characterize them as taxable facts because they have levied pronouncement of economic capacity. This attempt by the tax authorities, which gave rise to the sole paragraph of article 116 of CTN (the anti-tax planning general rule), intends to render any practice of tax planning fruitless by enhancing the German theory of economic interpretation of tax laws. Said legal provision authorizes disregarding legal acts and business that unbind the hypothesis of tax incidence, allowing taxation by the economic aspects of the transaction made by the taxpayer, and even though they are different businesses, the effects are the same, and taxation shall be performed. The use of economic interpretation for taxation of cases of tax planning is the introduction, in disguise, of the likewise method in tax law and the relaxation of the principle of tributary legality. Brazilian Constitution, on setting forth the legal security and the tributary legality, prohibited the use of analogy to the exigency of tribute, which only resulted from the law. Evidence wealthy condition to be taxed is not sufficient; there must be the legal provision on a cumulative basis. Tax authorities do not have the competence to equate distinct legal transactions to tax them equally, albeit under the pretext of promoting of fiscal justice. Fighting tax planning should be done by the legislative branch and through specific manner, and where capacity to pay is found, the lawmaker is authorized to introduce taxes. The right to effectiveness of tax planning is based on freedom, free enterprise and private autonomy and it is safeguarded by the principle of tributary legality / A obrigação tributária é compulsória e decorre de lei, dessa forma, praticado o fato imponível, o sujeito passivo não pode eximir-se do pagamento do tributo. Visando diminuir o ônus tributário, muitos contribuintes têm programado suas ações licitamente para optar por condutas alternativas às hipóteses de incidência tributária, evitando a ocorrência do fato imponível. É o que se tem chamado de elisão fiscal ou planejamento tributário. Elisão fiscal não se confunde com evasão fiscal, conduta ilícita que suprime o pagamento do tributo devido. Para evitar o planejamento, que reduz a arrecadação tributária, o Fisco e parte da doutrina defendem a possibilidade de desconsideração dos atos e negócios alternativos para que seja possível caracterizá-los como fatos imponíveis por possuírem manifestação de capacidade econômica. Tal pretensão do Fisco, que resultou no parágrafo único do art. 116 do CTN a norma geral antielisiva , quer tornar infrutífera qualquer prática de planejamento tributário, revigorando a teoria germânica da interpretação econômica das leis tributárias. O referido dispositivo legal autoriza a desconsideração dos atos e negócios jurídicos que se desvinculem da hipótese de incidência tributária, permitindo a tributação pelos aspectos econômicos da transação realizada pelo contribuinte, e ainda que sejam negócios diferentes, se os efeitos forem os mesmos, a tributação deverá ser realizada. A utilização da interpretação econômica para a tributação dos casos de planejamento tributário é a introdução, disfarçada, do método analógico do ordenamento jurídico tributário e a flexibilização do princípio da legalidade tributária. A Constituição Federal de 1988, ao consagrar a segurança jurídica e a legalidade tributária, vedou a utilização da analogia para a exigência de tributo, que somente decorre da lei. Não basta que haja a demonstração de riqueza apta a ser tributada, é preciso que haja, cumulativamente, a previsão legal. O Fisco não possui a competência de equiparar negócios jurídicos distintos para tributá-los igualmente, ainda que seja com o pretexto de realização da justiça fiscal. O combate à elisão fiscal deve ser feito pelo Poder Legislativo e de forma específica, e onde houver capacidade contributiva o legislador está autorizado a instituir tributo. O direito de efetivação do planejamento tributário é fundado na liberdade, na livre iniciativa e na autonomia privada e resguardado pela legalidade tributária

<p>Försvarsmaktens slutrapport från perspektivplaneringen 2007 innehåller ett avsnitt vilket avhandlar strategiskt samarbete med andra stater. Flera områden, vilka berör Försvarsmaktens operativa förmåga, identifieras som lämpliga för samarbete med de nordiska länderna. I detta sammanhang uttrycker Försvarsmakten ett bibehållande av nationell strategisk handlingsfrihet trots att uppbyggnaden av den operativa förmågan föreslås delas mellan olika länder. Uppsatsens problem och syfte tar sitt avstamp i ovan beskrivna sammanhang. Detta sker genom att undersöka vad begreppet handlingsfrihet kan sägas betyda när det uttrycks i sammanhang av mellanstatligt samarbete. Resultatet av begreppsanalysen visar att handlingsfrihet i den aktuella kontexten innefattar en för aktören inre kamp kring mål och medel samt en kamp mot de begränsningar traditioner och lagar ger. Vidare innehåller begreppet en yttre kamp syftande till att optimera åtgärder för att undersöka motståndarens intention</p> / <p>The Armed Forces’ final report from the perspective planning in 2007 contains a section which deals with strategic cooperation with other states. Several areas, which affect the Armed Forces operational capability, are identified as suitable for collaboration with the Nordic countries. In this context, the Armed Forces express maintenance of national strategic freedom of action, while building the operational capacity would be allocated between different countries. The essay’s problem and objective takes its starting point in the context described above. This is done by examining what freedom of action can be said to mean when it is expressed in the context of intergovernmental cooperation. The result of the conceptual analysis shows that freedom of action in the current context includes an internal struggle about means and ends, and a struggle against the limitations provided by traditions and laws. The result also makes the notion of an external struggle that is aimed at optimizing measures to investigate the opponent's intentions.</p>

THIS THESIS PRESENTS an empirical ethnographic study that has been conducted as fieldwork within army command organizations, leading to a qualitative analysis of data. The title of the thesis captures the contents of both command work and research, both domains being affected by new technologies during a period of drastic changes in the military institution. The overriding research question was why efforts to implement modern information technology are so slow, costly, and why the contribution from the output as regards higher control efficiency is so uncertain. Two cases will be described and analysed. One is a meeting and the other is the development of a computer artefact. Based on these two cases, the study suggests that social value and not only rational control efficiency defines what is applied, both in the development process and in practice. Knowledge and power, expertise and authority, represented by experts and formal leaders have to be brought together if the work is to be efficient. Both knowledge from research and information technology will be rejected, if considered irrelevant. I have called this applying a rationality of practice. From the case analysis it can be said that command work is not ordinary managerial work. Rather, it is a kind of design work, dynamic and hard to define and control. Command work is knowledge-intensive; it designs and produces symbols. Therefore it is very flexible and involves interpretation and negotiation of both its content and products. The most important symbol is the Army, which must be visible and credible, built from real components. Command work is pragmatic and opportunistic, conducted by experts in the modern military command structure who transform the operational environment, and control it through controlling actions. In that respect autonomy, a prerequisite to meet evolving events—frictions—and power become core issues, interchangeable goals and means for flexible social control, in cybernetic terms variety. Key concepts are social value, function and visibility. Actors must be visible in the command work, and make work visible. Consequently, when designing control tools, such as information systems, the design challenge is to reconcile dynamic and pragmatic demands for power, autonomy and control with demands for stability. Such an organization becomes a viable system, one that can survive, because there is no conflict between its mind and physical resources. In operational terms, this means having freedom of action. The prerequisite to achieve this is one perspective on knowledge and information and that information systems match the needs growing from within the work because work builds the organization.

Försvarsmaktens slutrapport från perspektivplaneringen 2007 innehåller ett avsnitt vilket avhandlar strategiskt samarbete med andra stater. Flera områden, vilka berör Försvarsmaktens operativa förmåga, identifieras som lämpliga för samarbete med de nordiska länderna. I detta sammanhang uttrycker Försvarsmakten ett bibehållande av nationell strategisk handlingsfrihet trots att uppbyggnaden av den operativa förmågan föreslås delas mellan olika länder. Uppsatsens problem och syfte tar sitt avstamp i ovan beskrivna sammanhang. Detta sker genom att undersöka vad begreppet handlingsfrihet kan sägas betyda när det uttrycks i sammanhang av mellanstatligt samarbete. Resultatet av begreppsanalysen visar att handlingsfrihet i den aktuella kontexten innefattar en för aktören inre kamp kring mål och medel samt en kamp mot de begränsningar traditioner och lagar ger. Vidare innehåller begreppet en yttre kamp syftande till att optimera åtgärder för att undersöka motståndarens intention / The Armed Forces’ final report from the perspective planning in 2007 contains a section which deals with strategic cooperation with other states. Several areas, which affect the Armed Forces operational capability, are identified as suitable for collaboration with the Nordic countries. In this context, the Armed Forces express maintenance of national strategic freedom of action, while building the operational capacity would be allocated between different countries. The essay’s problem and objective takes its starting point in the context described above. This is done by examining what freedom of action can be said to mean when it is expressed in the context of intergovernmental cooperation. The result of the conceptual analysis shows that freedom of action in the current context includes an internal struggle about means and ends, and a struggle against the limitations provided by traditions and laws. The result also makes the notion of an external struggle that is aimed at optimizing measures to investigate the opponent's intentions.