Bakgrund: Att skada sig själv är ingen ny företeelse utan tvärtom ett gammalt fenomen. I Sverige är det svårt att uppskatta antalet personer som skadar sig eftersom det finns få studier gjorda och för att det finns ett stort mörkertal som aldrig uppmärksammas. Att skära sig i huden är förmodligen det vanligaste sättet att skada sig på och orsakerna till självskadebeteendet varierar. Syfte: Syftet med litteraturstudien var att beskriva omvårdnad av patienter med självskadebeteende. Metod: Studien är baserad på 10 vetenskapliga artiklar. Resultat: Resultatet presenteras ur två olika perspektiv, omvårdnad ur patientperspektiv och omvårdnad ur personalperspektiv. Patienterna ville bli behandlade med värdighet, och att någon fanns till hands upplevdes betydelsefullt. Personalen försökte se människan bakom skadan och menade att grunden till en god omvårdnad byggde på empati där förförståelsen skulle läggas åt sidan. Diskussion: Det mest betydelsefulla var att se patienten som en människa och inte bara som en person med problem. Om personalen var empatisk uppnåddes tillit och förtroende. / Background: Self-harm is not a new problem, it´s rather an old phenomenon. In Sweden, it is difficult to estimate the number of people who harm themselves. There are few studies done and there is a large dark figure that is difficult to estimate. To cut the skin is probably the most common way to inflict self-harm and the causes varies. Purpose: The purpose of the literature study was to describe nursing care of patients with self-injury behaviour. Method: The study is based on 10 scientific articles. Result: The result is presented from two perspectives; nursing care from the patient perspective and from the nursing staff perspective. Patients wishes to be treated with dignity, and that someone being available was important. The staff tried to see the person behind the injury, and the caring was based on empathy, where the understanding of the behaviour should be set aside. Discussion: The most important objective was to see the patient as a person and not just as a person with problems. If the staff were empathetic, trust and confidence was achieved.

<p>Den psykiska ohälsan bland unga kvinnor ökar i samhället idag.  Självskadebeteendet kan vara ett sätt för dem att lindra sin ångest. Tidigare forskning visar att sjuksköterskor upplever en vanmakt och osäkerhet inför denna patientgrupp. Syftet med denna studie är att, genom kvalitativ analys av fyra självbiografier, beskriva unga kvinnors upplevelser av självskadebeteende. Resultatet bygger på fyra huvudkategorier med vardera två subkategorier som illustreras och förtydligas med citat från författarna. Huvudkategorierna speglar fyra områden som har stor betydelse för utvecklingen av självskadebeteendet. Resultatet beskriver författarnas gemensamma erfarenheter av självförakt och utanförskap, samt deras olika uppväxtförhållanden och personligheter. Diskussionen betonar att vårdpersonalen bör närma sig lidandet bakom självskadebeteendet med förståelse och respekt, vilket kräver kunskap om patienter som skadar sig själva.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> / <p>The mental unhealthiness amongst young women is increasing in society today. Self-harm behaviour can be a way for them to alleviate their anxiety. Previous research shows that nurses perceive powerlessness and uncertainty for this population. The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of self-harm behaviour in young women through qualitative analysis of four autobiographies. The result is based on four major categories, each with two subcategories, illustrated and clarified with quotations from the authors. The major categories reflect four areas of key importance to the development of self-harm behaviour. The result describes the authors' common experience of self contempt and alienation, and their different growing conditions and personalities. The discussion emphasizes that health care providers should approach the suffering behind self-harm behaviour with understanding and respect, which requires knowledge of patients harming themselves.</p>

<p>SAMMANFATTNING</p><p>Vårdpersonal möter patienter med självskadebeteende på olika avdelningar inom sjukvården. Vårdpersonalen har ofta svårt att bemöta denne patientgrupp eftersom de trots allt vårdar patienterna efter bästa förmåga ändå skadar sig igen. Detta väcker frustration och negativa känslor som vrede och mindre sympati för dessa patienter. Oftast är det unga kvinnor som lindrar sin ångest med att skada sig själva medan unga män oftare väljer att vara våldsamma eller aggressiva. Syftet med studien var att belysa vårdpersonalens uppfattning och bemötande av patienter med självskadebeteende. Metoden är en artikelgranskning. Resultatet visade att det är viktigt att vårdpersonal ser, förstår och bemöter patienterna med respekt för att de skall få ett bättre självförtroende. Varje person är unik och en egen individ. Det är därför viktigt att se bakom självskadande för att se till varje persons behov och förstå att det oftast är andra problem som ligger bakom självskadandet. Vårdpersonal med utbildning till att vårda patienter med självskadebeteende är bättre på att ta hand om dessa patienter än personal utan utbildning.</p><p>Mera kunskap och utbildning om självskadandet skulle hjälpa personal till att upptäcka problemet tidigare. Vården skulle då bli bättre och kanske kortare för patienter med självskadebeteende.</p>

Advance directives are instructions given by patients – or potential patients – specifying what actions ought to be taken for their health in the event that they are no longer capable to make decisions due to illness or incapacity. Over the last decades, there has been a rising tide in favour of advance directives: not only is the use of such directives recommended by most medical and advisory bodies, they are also gaining increasing legal recognition in many parts of the world. This book, however, takes as its point of departure one of the most commonly discussed medical-ethical arguments against granting advance directives moral force: the Objection from Personal Identity. The adherers of this objection basically asserts that when there is lacking psychological continuity between the person who formulated the advance directive and the later patient to whom it supposedly applies, this seriously threatens the directive’s moral authority. And, further, that this is so because lacking sufficient psychological continuity implies that the author of the advance directive is numerically distinct from the later patient. Although this argument has some initial appeal, most philosophers in the advance directives debate maintain that the Objection from Personal Identity fails, but suggest different reasons as to why. Whereas some argue that the objection has no force because it rests on faulty beliefs about personal identity, others argue that we ought to grant advance directives moral authority even if the author and the later patient are numerically distinct beings. This book investigates some of the most influential of these arguments and reaches the conclusion that the Objection from Personal Identity has more to it than is usually recognized in the medical-ethical debate. Lacking sufficient psychological continuity between author and later patient, it is concluded, does threaten the moral authority of the advance directive.

The present study examined the experience of self-cutting, what stops adolescent girls from engaging in self-cutting, and what message adolescent girls who are self-cutting would want to send to other girls taking part in this behavior. Using an existential-phenomenological method of interviewing, adolescent girls were asked a serious of questions in order to gain insight into their thoughts, feelings, and beliefs about the experience of self-cutting. Each interview was tape recorded, transcribed, and thematized. The participants in this study were labeled co-researchers due to the significant role that they had in the completion of this study. The co-researchers consisted of six adolescent girls aged 15 to 18 years old. They all attended high schools within a large urban school district in Florida. Through a reduction of the data obtained during the interviews, five superordinate themes were discovered for the first research question, which examined the experience of self-cutting. The themes depicted the following experience. Before engaging in self-cutting, each co-researcher had "A Lot of Feelings" stemming from "A Big Event" that they needed to "Release." They chose cutting because "Nothing [else] Ever Worked" and the act of cutting made them "Numb" and feel "No Pain." Themes developed from the second research question, which examined what stops adolescent girls from self-cutting, included "Thinking About the People Who Care" or when "Thinking About the Consequences" of cutting. If they could send a message to other girls who are cutting, the co-researchers in this study would say "Don't Do It." The co-researchers were able to articulate other coping strategies to serve the same function as cutting but sometimes refused to implement them. Results of this study support the findings of previous research.

The current study sought to prospectively explore the potential main effects and interactive relations among drive for thinness, life event stress, and harm avoidance in the prediction of disordered eating in an ethnically diverse sample of women (N = 58). During the initial and follow-up assessments, standardized questionnaires were utilized to assess drive for thinness, life event stress, and a harm avoidant temperament. Additionally, semi-structured diagnostic interviews were administered to assess disordered eating. Results revealed a significant interaction between drive for thinness and life event stress in the prediction of eating pathology. Neither the two-way life event stress x harm avoidance interaction nor the three-way drive for thinness x life event stress x harm avoidance interaction were significant predictors of eating pathology. These findings suggest that the previously suggested relation between drive for thinness and pathological eating is dependent upon the degree of life event stress experienced.

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the role of distress tolerance in suicidality among Black college students. It was hypothesized that (1) individuals with low levels of distress tolerance would report higher levels of suicide ideation; (2) individuals with high levels of distress tolerance would report greater suicide attempts; (3) social support would moderate the relationship between distress tolerance and suicide ideation; (4) social support would moderate the relationship between distress tolerance and suicide attempts; and that (5) family and peer support would act as distinct buffers against suicidality. These hypotheses were tested by surveying 47 undergraduate university students (female = 49%; mean age = 22.45). Participants completed packets with self-report measures that included: the Self-Harm Behavior Questionnaire, the Distress Tolerance Scale, the Child and Adolescent Social Support, and demographics. Results suggested that individuals with low levels of distress tolerance showed greater history of self-harm behavior when compared to individuals with high levels of distress tolerance. Results indicated that social support moderated the relationship between distress tolerance level and history of self-harm behaviors. Results also indicated that family support acted as significant protective factor against suicidality.

Research that explores the relationship between suicide and self-injury is limited, and the lack of clarity surrounding this topic can present challenges for professional counselors. Although persons who self-injure are at an increased risk for suicide (e.g., Toprak, Cetin, Guven, Can, & Demircan, 2011; Chapman & Dixon-Gordon, 2007), not all individuals who engage in self-injurious behaviors attempt or complete suicide (e.g., Hawton & Harriss, 2008; Howson, Yates, & Hatcher, 2008). Research on common and distinct risk factors for suicide and self-injury (e.g., Andover, Primack, Gibb, & Pepper, 2010; Brausch & Gutierrez, 2010; Greydanus & Apple, 2011; Hawton & James, 2005; Lloyd-Richardson, Perrine, Dierker, & Kelley, 2007; Toprak et al., 2011; Wichstrom, 2009), as well as emotional antecedents and consequences for suicide and self-injury (e.g., Chapman & Dixon-Gordon, 2007), has contributed to our understanding of this complex relationship. However, the specific nature of the relationship remains unclear. This study serves to help fill the gap in the literature by examining advanced professional counselors’, as measured by the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire-Revised, conceptualizations of the relationship between suicide and self-injury and by exploring how the presence of self-injury impacts clinical assessment and interventions. Data was collected by means of an online survey. Analysis was conducted by a research team using qualitative content analysis. Seven categories emerged, including: relationship between suicide and self-injury, functions of self-injury, associated risk, suicide risk assessment, treatment planning and goals, intervention, and identification of self-injury.

The dissertation critiques certain developments on the legal definition of genocide while also showing how Canada has failed to comply with customary international laws. It develops the argument that the forcible transferring of Indigenous Peoples’ children into the dominating society meets the criteria set out in the Genocide Convention. The issue will be examined from a “cognitive” lens of domination and dehumanization that unpacks the destructive framework of colonialism in international law. This is necessary because the euphemistic colonial language employed to benignly characterize the destruction experienced by Indigenous Peoples’ children conceals the reality of the genocidal harm against the Original Nations in the Western Hemisphere and globally. The forcible transferring of children from one group to another group causes the collective serious bodily and mental harm onto scores of Indigenous Peoples’ children and ultimately Indigenous Nations as human groups. This violates articles 2 (b) and (e) of the Convention. The Canadian Criminal Code and the limited definition of genocide are integral to the colonial oppressive relationship in international law. This thesis has two objectives, first, to name and describe the experience of genocide experienced by Indigenous Peoples. Second, the thesis analyzes whether the Canadian state has violated the Genocide Convention.

Bakgrund:Ett av dagens problem är att vårdpersonal i mötet med föräldrar till barn med självskadebeteende, har en brist på förståelse för deras upplevelser. Föräldrars upplevelser är viktiga för vårdpersonal att veta om för att kunna ge god omvårdnad utan att vara dömande. Syfte: Syftet var att beskriva föräldrars upplevelser av att ha ett barn med självskadebeteende. Metod: Studien gjordes som en litteraturstudie baserad på sju kvalitativa artiklar. Resultat: I litteraturstudien framkom fyra huvudkategorier: Föräldrarna upplevde hjälplöshet, föräldrarna riktade sin ilska mot barnet, föräldrarna kände att det var deras fel och föräldrarna upplevde en brist på hjälp. De framkom även att flera föräldrar upplevde en brist på hjälp från vården. De visste inte var hjälpen fanns att söka eller var de skulle vända sig för att få stöd. Föräldrarna tror att de lättare kunnat hantera livet om de fått hjälp av vården. Diskussion: Bristen som föräldrarna upplevde av vården kan bero på felfördelning av resurser. Hade mer ekonomiska resurser prioriterats på vård av anhöriga, hade kanske behandlingstiden förkortats för barnet. Föräldrarna hade också känt sig mer meningsfulla och delaktiga i behandlingen. De framkom att föräldraras reaktioner liknar de som förekommer i en kris. Chockfasen, reaktionsfasen, bearbetningsfasen och nyorienteringsfasen är de delar som förekommer i en kris. Slutsats: Familjeperspektivet är viktigt att betona när vårdpersonal möter ett barn med självskadebeteende och deras anhöriga. Sjuksköterskan bör ha kunskap om andra instanser som kan ge stöd till patienten och anhöriga i en kris om de inte själva har kompetensen inom området. Forskning vore önskvärd om hur sjukvårdspersonal ska bemöta föräldrar för att ge bättre omvårdnad. / Background: One of today's problems is that health professionals in meeting with parents of children with self-harm, has a lack of understanding of their experiences. Parents' experiences are important for healthcare professionals to know about in order to provide good care without being judgmental. Objective: The objective was to describe parents' experiences of having a child with self-harm. Method: The study was done as a literature study based on seven qualitative articles. Results: The literature study revealed four main categories: The parents felt helpless, the parents directed their anger against the child, the parents felt it was their fault and the parents experienced a lack of help. They also found that many parents experienced a lack of help from health care. They did not know where help was to look or where to turn for support. Parents think they are more able to deal with life if they received help from health care. Discussion: The lack of parental experiences of care may be due to misallocation of resources. Had more funding priority in the care of relatives, was perhaps shortened the duration of treatment for the child. The parents had also felt more meaningful and involved in treatment. They found that parents' reactions are similar to those encountered in a crisis. Shock phase, reaction phase, processing phase and reorientation phase is the part that occurs in a crisis. Conclusion: The family perspective is important to remember when professionals encounter a child with self-harm and their relatives. The nurse should have knowledge of other agencies that can provide support to patients and families in a crisis if they do not have expertise in the area. Research would be desirable with focus on how the medical staff can provide better care to the parents.