Orientador: Jose Oscar de Almeida Marques / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-08T10:37:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Freire_CarloCurvelano_M.pdf: 793382 bytes, checksum: ff29a4faa0e2668d358a2f68cf823fe6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 / Resumo: Os objetivos do presente estudo são, além de apontar na obra de Rousseau princípios de moral e de gosto que podem servir para esclarecer a gênese de seu famoso romance, mostrar que o autor, com sua Nova Heloísa, já antecipava para seus leitores alguns dos princípios de sua pedagogia, compilados sobretudo no Emílio, e demonstrava estar bem avançado no desenvolvimento de alguns dos princípios de sua teoria política, organizados de forma mais exaustiva sobretudo no Contrato Social. / Abstract: The objectives of the present study are, besides pointing in the work of Rousseau principles of moral and taste that may serve to elucidate the genesis of his famous romance, to show that the author, with his La nouvelle Heloise, already anticipated for his readers some of the principles of his pedagogy, compiled above all in the Emile, and has shown himself to be very advanced in the development of some principles of his political theory, organized in a exhaustive way chiefly in the Social Contract. / Mestrado / Historia da Filosofia Moderna / Mestre em Filosofia

Orientador: Martha Rosa Pisani Destro / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-11T13:38:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Batista_GustavoAraujo_D.pdf: 1579436 bytes, checksum: cddc80f045bbe9d4440dbf238f7eff50 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / Resumo : Este trabalho é uma síntese feita a partir de uma pesquisa bibliográfica de filosofia comparada da educação, desenvolvida sobre dois tipos de pensamento pedagógico, elaborados, respectivamente, por John Locke (1632-1704) e por Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778); nessa pesquisa faz-se uma leitura de suas propostas pedagógicas à luz teórico-metodológica do materialismo histórico-dialético. Procurou-se contextualizar historicamente os dois autores abordados, com o intuito de demonstrar em que medida as rupturas e as permanências geradas pelas contradições nas infraestruturas econômicas das sociedades de suas respectivas épocas interferiram nas superestruturas políticas, filosóficas, intelectuais, religiosas e pedagógicas e, conseqüentemente, em suas trajetórias existenciais e em suas obras. Dividindo-se em três capítulos, no primeiro discorre-se sobre a contextualização histórica dos dois filósofos estudados, passando-se em revista os Séculos XVII e XVIII em seus vários aspectos, assim como nele se faz uma descrição acerca das biografias e das personalidades desses autores; no segundo incumbe-se de abordar os pensamentos lockeano e rousseauniano como um todo, ressaltando-se as principais categorias pelas quais seus autores estruturam e articulam as suas idéias acerca do conhecimento, da política, da religião e da tolerância; no terceiro aborda-se algumas categorias pedagógicas desses pensamentos, as quais, comparadas entre si, têm o intuito de aclarar as convergências entre os seus dois autores, ao mesmo tempo em que se procura ressaltar a influência que este recebe daquele em se tratando de constituir o seu pensamento pedagógico; também nesse capítulo são explicitadas as visões de mundo e de homem nas quais esses autores enquadrar-se-iam, assim como são tratadas outras categorias que permitem vincular os seus pensamentos não apenas entre si, mas sim às classes sociais para as quais suas obras constituem significado / Abstract : This work is a synthesis done from a bibliographical research of compared philosophy of education, developed about two kinds of pedagogical thinking, done, respectively, by John Locke (1632-1704) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778); in that research one does a reading of their pedagogical proposals by the theoretical-methodological light of the historical-dialectical materialism. One looked for doing historically a context about the two authors approached, with the aim of showing in what measure the ruptures and the permanencies produced by the contradictions in the economical infrastructure of the societies of their respective eras interfered into the political, philosophical, intellectual, religious and pedagogical superstructures and, consequently, into their existential trajectories and into their works. Being divided into three chapters, in the first one discusses about the historical context of the two philosophers studied, passing on review the XVIIth and XVIIIth centuries in their several aspects, as well as in this it is done a description concerning the biographies and personalities of those authors; in the second one undertakes to approach the lockean and rousseaunian thoughts at all, standing out the main categories by which their authors structure and articulate their ideas concerning knowledge, politics, religion and toleration; in the third one approaches some pedagogical categories of those thoughts, that, compared to one another, have the aim of clearing the convergences between their two authors, at the same time on which one looks for standing out the influence that this receives from that in regarding of constructing his pedagogical thinking; also in this chapter are made explicit the visions of world and man into which those two authors would be fitted, as well as are treated others categories that permit to link their thoughts not only each other, but so to the social classes to which their works make meaning / Doutorado / Historia, Filosofia e Educação / Doutor em Educação

Orientador: Yara Adario Frateschi / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-23T02:07:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Silva_HelioAlexandreda_D.pdf: 2204274 bytes, checksum: 8aa4eb84e6477f8a45ae03d47e363579 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 / Resumo: O trabalho que aqui se apresenta se coloca no campo da relação entre filosofia moderna e filosofia contemporânea. O objetivo mais amplo é tentar recuperar, do ponto de vista da história da filosofia, algumas complexidades e tensões presentes na filosofia moderna que invariavelmente são marginalizadas quando apropriadas pela filosofia contemporânea. Dito de um modo mais específico, este trabalho parte de breves considerações sobre o pensamento de Axel Honneth e Jürgen Habermas acerca da apropriação que ambos fazem da filosofia moderna, especialmente do pensamento de Thomas Hobbes e de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Tais considerações visam situar a obra dos dois autores modernos no interior dos projetos teóricos de Honneth e Habermas, especialmente no que se refere à esfera pública e aos conflitos sociais. A partir dessas considerações é que emerge o objetivo central, qual seja: defender a hipótese (tendo como pano de fundo a apropriação de Honneth e Habermas) de que Hobbes e Rousseau possuem uma relação sui generis com a modernidade e com o Iluminismo, respectivamente. Essa relação de Hobbes e Rousseau com seus contextos históricos e com o pensamento filosófico que surge desses contextos é o que me permite caracterizar o pensamento de Hobbes como um modernismo relutante e o pensamento de Rousseau como um iluminismo relutante. Em ambos os casos, me utilizo do espírito da expressão "modernismo relutante" cunhada por Seyla Benhabib para se referir à obra de Hannah Arendt. Desse modo, tendo como ponto de partida duas vertentes da Teoria Crítica da sociedade, penso ser possível retroceder até a modernidade para tentar investigar tanto seu potencial teórico passível de ser atualizado, quanto às dificuldades, complexidades e tensões que essas atualizações podem gerar, notadamente no campo da estruturação política e da organização social / Abstract: This work is in the field of the relationship between modern and contemporary philosophy. The broader goal is trying to recover, from the standpoint of the history of philosophy, some complexities and tensions existing in modern philosophy that are invariably marginalized when appropriated by contemporary philosophy. More specifically: This thesis begins with brief considerations on Jürgen Habermas' and Axel Honneth's appropriations of modern philosophy, specifically the thought of Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Such considerations aim to situate the work of these two modern authors within the theoretical projects of Habermas and Honneth, especially with regard to the public sphere and social conflicts. From these considerations, it emerges the main objective of this work, which is to defend the hypothesis (having as a background Habermas' and Honneth's appropriations), of Hobbes and Rousseau having a sui generis relationship with modernity and the Enlightenment, respectively. The relationships of Hobbes and Rousseau with their historical contexts and their relationships with the philosophical thought which emerges from these contexts is what allows me to characterize the thought of Hobbes as a reluctant modernism and the thought of Rousseau as a reluctant Enlightenment. In both cases I use the spirit of the term "reluctant modernism" forged by Seyla Benhabib to refer to the work of Hannah Arendt. Thus, taking as its starting point two theories of current Critical Theory of society, I think it is possible to go back until modernity in order to investigate both its theoretical potential susceptible to be updated, as well as the difficulties, complexities and tensions that these updates can generate, specifically in the fields of political structuration and social organization / Doutorado / Filosofia / Doutor em Filosofia

Submitted by Reginaldo Soares de Freitas (reginaldo.freitas@ufv.br) on 2018-06-05T13:36:29Z No. of bitstreams: 1 texto completo.pdf: 1076953 bytes, checksum: 265ba8ed1641df5086b81afbe3daaac9 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Reginaldo Soares de Freitas (reginaldo.freitas@ufv.br) on 2018-06-05T13:36:44Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 texto completo.pdf: 1076953 bytes, checksum: 265ba8ed1641df5086b81afbe3daaac9 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Reginaldo Soares de Freitas (reginaldo.freitas@ufv.br) on 2018-06-05T13:37:09Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 texto completo.pdf: 1076953 bytes, checksum: 265ba8ed1641df5086b81afbe3daaac9 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-05T13:37:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 texto completo.pdf: 1076953 bytes, checksum: 265ba8ed1641df5086b81afbe3daaac9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 / Propõe-se, nesta investigação de natureza bibliográfica, uma leitura da obra Emílio, de Rousseau. Trata-se de examinar a relação entre os princípios educativos da autonomia e da sociabilidade na concepção de educação de Rousseau e as duas noções de conhecimentos úteis - as coisas e a prática das virtudes. Na aprendizagem, tais noções consistem em objetos de conhecimentos úteis para o educando desenvolver sua autonomia e a sua sociabilidade e, por conseguinte, harmonizar na sua formação a ordem moral e a ordem natural. A concepção de educação do filósofo se constitui como uma crítica ao ensino moral da educação convencional, cuja aprendizagem acontecia por meio da imposição de regras de condutas e pelas representações da realidade. Essa educação moral forma o homem civil que em sociedade vive em contradição: não sabe se age conforme suas inclinações naturais ou de acordo com os deveres exigidos no meio social. O ponto-chave da pesquisa é demonstrar que os objetos de conhecimento (os objetos físicos e a prática do bem) são instrumentos úteis na aprendizagem de Emílio para desenvolver a sua autonomia e a sua sociabilidade. É por meio da educação e da interferência do educador que esses dois princípios (autonomia e sociabilidade) são desenvolvidos e vinculados na formação do discípulo. Assim é possível formar o “homem raro”, que é o selvagem que vive em sociedade, justamente porque conserva sua liberdade e desenvolve sua consciência moral. A lição que Rousseau ensina e a de pensar o contexto do ensino verdadeiro (no sentido real), conciliado com a natureza humana e com a construção de uma educação para a autonomia e para a sociabilidade. / This bibliographical investigation offers a reading of Rousseauºs Emile. The research examines the relationship between the educational principles of autonomy and sociability in Rousseauºs thought and the two ideas of useful knowledge - the things and the practice of virtues. In relation to learning, these ideas consist in objects of knowledge that are useful for learners to develop their autonomy and their sociability and, consequently, to harmonize, in their formations, the moral and the natural orders. The philosopherºs concept of education constitutes itself as a criticism to the moral teaching of conventional education, in which learning happened by the imposing of rules of conduct and by the representations of reality. This moral education forms the civic man who, in society, lives in contradiction: he does not know if he acts according to his natural inclinations, or according to the duties demanded in the social context. This research aims at demonstrating that the objects of knowledge (the physical objects and the practice of good) are useful instruments in Emileºs learning for developing his autonomy and his sociability. It is through education and the interference of the educator that these two principles (autonomy and sociability) are developed and associated in the formation of the leamer. Thus, a “rare man” can be formed, a savage that lives in society, precisely because he preserves his freedom and develops his moral consciousness. Therefore, Rousseau proposes thinking about the context of true learning (in the real sense) reconciled with human nature and with the construction of an education directed towards autonomy and sociability.

Les palimpsestes poétiques de Johann Jakob Bodmer (1698–1783) se caractérisent incontestablement par des dialogues socratiques et ironiques. À un moment de l’histoire des sciences et de la critique, les parodies littéraires et les satires polémiques confirmèrent la position de l’auteur zurichois dans la querelle littéraire allemande ce que ma thèse met à jour. Le programme rationaliste des réformes éducatives qui se profilait dans ces fictions innovatrices de critique littéraire, est mon premier axe d’étude. À quel point la pédagogie de Rousseau, basée sur un modèle d’ « éducation négative », pouvait être considérée comme un dispositif du programme pédagogique et politique de Bodmer est un deuxième axe d’étude.Le choix des textes prend en compte toute une gamme de pratiques diverses et variées de la parodie et de la satire. En se fondant sur une analyse exemplaire du démontage des adversaires, les relations de la critique, c’est-à-dire les relations et mouvements de la poésie, se dévoilent. Nous avons utilisé une méthode comparatiste pour l’analyse des palimpsestes de Bodmer ; cette enquête s’est fondée sur les approches de l’intertextualité et du dialogue en rapport avec la notion dialectique de Jean Starobinski (*1920) ainsi que sur les théories de l’esthétique de la réception de l’École de Constance. / Certainly the poetic palimpsests of Johann Jakob Bodmer (1698–1783) are characterised by Socratic and ironic dialogues. At a certain point in the history of sciences and of critics and as my thesis demonstrates, the literary parodies as well as polemic satires confirmed Bodmer's point of view with reference to the German literary dispute. One axis of my investigation was the rationalistic programme of educational reforms, which profiled those innovative fictions of literary criticism. Another axis, examined at what point the pedagogy of Rousseau, based on the model of a "negative education" could possibly be an instrument for Bodmer's pedagogic and political programme. My choice of texts and works took a whole series of genres into consideration all of which make use of the different styles and variations of parody and satire. Based on an exemplary analysis of the adversaries’ dismantlement, the critical interactions, meaning the movements of poetry are becoming visible. In order to be able to analyse the poetic palimpsests of Bodmer, a comparing method has been instrumentalized. This method is based on intertextual and dialogue approaches with reference to the dialectical notion of Jean Starobinski (*1920) as well as the theories of the reader-response criticism of the School of Constance.

Orientador: Roberto Romano / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-24T07:42:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Silva_GenildoFerreirada_M.pdf: 4319062 bytes, checksum: 536c87ca9d2984ab332faf57e150c44e (MD5) Previous issue date: 1998 / Resumo: Não informado / Abstract: Not informed. / Mestrado / Mestre em Filosofia

This essay compares the theory of human rights and human responsibility to the reality in the Swedish government. The aim is to understand what the            philosophers in this case study are saying about human rights and responsibility. The essay also asks how the philosopher’s theories compare to the reality in the Swedish State.  When comparing the theory of John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Robert Nozick to the Swedish government and laws we understand that Rousseau is the most conservative and yet the one out of the three philosophers that are closest to  Swedish State reality. Locke is not very different from Rousseau and a lot of how the Swedish State works is compatible whit his thoughts. Nozick, being the one that is most liberal, is then the one that has ideas that are most different from the Swedish State 2021 even though Sweden is known to be one of the most liberal and equal states in the world.

No description available.

Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

This thesis is a comparative study of Rousseau's philosophy on education, with emphasis placed on the practical arts, to show how his philosophy of practical arts has influenced the philosophy of present day industrial arts in the secondary schools of the United States.