El presente proyecto de investigación tiene como objetivo general establecer el criterio de fiabilidad para la admisión o exclusión de la prueba prohibida en el proceso penal peruano. Ahora bien, con relación a la metodología empleada es aplicada o tecnológica, de revisión documental, teórica y bibliográfica, utilizando las técnicas de la observación, la ficha textual y las pautas de análisis documental. Entre los resultados se comprende que, en ningún momento se pretende alentar la obtención de pruebas prohibidas en el proceso penal peruano, al contrario, la jurisprudencia contradictoria demuestra el desenvolvimiento desordenado e inconsistente de la regla de exclusión y sus excepciones, considerando que, estas últimas pretenden solucionar la problemática que subyace en la aplicación de la primera. Es por ello que, no debe operar la regla de exclusión, cuando sea manifiesta la realidad de los hechos materia de investigación y no exista duda acerca de su verosimilitud, de caber la duda, opera a favor del acusado, partiendo de la premisa que el Nuevo Código Procesal Penal (NCPP) es garantista no solo para el imputado, sino también para la parte agraviada, toda vez que, ningún Estado Constitucional de Derecho puede exceptuar a la persona de dicha garantía. / The general objective of this research project is to establish the reliability criteria for the admission or exclusion of prohibited evidence in the Peruvian criminal process. However, in relation to the methodology used, it is applied or technological, of documentary, theoretical and bibliographical review, using the techniques of observation, the textual record, and the guidelines of documentary analysis. Among the results it is understood that, at no time is it intended to encourage the obtaining of prohibited evidence in the Peruvian criminal process, on the contrary, the contradictory jurisprudence demonstrates the disorderly and inconsistent development of the exclusion rule and its exceptions, considering that the latter are intended to solve the problem that underlies the application of the first. That is why, the rule of exclusion should not operate, when the reality of the facts that are the subject of investigation is manifest and there is no doubt about its plausibility, if there is any doubt, it operates in favor of the accused, based on the premise that the New Criminal Procedure Code (NCPP) is a guarantee not only for the accused, but also for the aggrieved party, since no Constitutional State of Law can exempt the person from said guarantee.

El presente trabajo de investigación trata el requisito de apariencia de delito en la prisión preventiva y la categoría procesal de la evidencia como estándar probatorio para acreditarlo. Para tal efecto, bajo el método de análisis documental, conjuntamente con la técnica del fichaje, se revisan las instituciones jurídicas más importantes relacionadas. A partir de ello, se identifica la verdadera naturaleza de la prisión preventiva que responde a criterios de eficacia y criterios garantistas, manifestados en el peligro procesal y la apariencia de delito consecutivamente. Posteriormente, se analiza los elementos de convicción para acreditar apariencia de delito en la prisión preventiva bajo la categoría procesal de la evidencia, que exige ausencia de duda que después de realizada la audiencia de juicio oral el procesado será declarado culpable de la comisión del delito. Para tal efecto, los elementos de convicción que se utilicen serán consideradas auténticas pruebas en el proceso cautelar, cuya única deficiencia es que no han pasado los filtros de calidad que permite el control de acusación y el juicio oral. Asimismo, el estándar de la evidencia permite la discusión de las tres categorías del delito. / This research work deals with the requirement of appearance of crime in pretrial detention and the procedural category of evidence as a standard of proof to prove it. For this purpose, under the documentary analysis method, together with the signing technique, the most important related legal institutions are reviewed. From this, the true nature of preventive detention is identified, which responds to criteria of effectiveness and guarantee criteria, manifested in the procedural danger and the appearance of a crime consecutively. Subsequently, the elements of conviction are analyzed to prove the appearance of a crime in pretrial detention under the procedural category of evidence, which requires the absence of doubt that after the oral trial hearing the defendant will be found guilty of committing the crime. For this purpose, the elements of conviction that are used will be considered authentic evidence in the precautionary process, whose only deficiency is that they have not passed the quality filters that allow the control of the accusation and the oral trial. Likewise, the standard of evidence allows discussion of the three categories of crime.

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2018-08-15T12:21:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Samuel Alvarenga Gonçalves.pdf: 1661878 bytes, checksum: 769affec881a4b377e17c53a1b145e94 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-15T12:21:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Samuel Alvarenga Gonçalves.pdf: 1661878 bytes, checksum: 769affec881a4b377e17c53a1b145e94 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-06-25 / The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate some shortcomings and deficiencies involving the Brazilian procedural system of compliance and enforcement of judgments handed down in class actions that establish certain obligations to do before the Public Authorities, especially those dealing with the implementation of policies through the realization of diverse social rights. Moreover, it also intends to present some critical considerations about the ineffectiveness of some judicial measures that are traditionally applied in the face of the Executive Branch for the fulfillment of the order, which represents an authentic crisis of collective judicial protection. The premature and disorganized activation of the Judiciary by the various entities legitimized in the collective tutelage weakens the system of delivery of social rights foreseen in the Constitution. It is necessary the formal and pragmatic knowledge of the administrative activity to work on the public policy issue in the area of access to Justice. In fact, the political-administrative world is the area where the Executive Branch carries out its final activities in accordance with the constitutional panel provided for in the Charter of 1988. However, this political-administrative world has very peculiar specificities that end up representing (albeit involuntarily) authentic shields to the jurisdictional invests emanating from the legal world. Therefore, the Law operator must have the sensitivity to realize that sometimes there will be a real administrative encapsulation of the public entity, culminating in constitutional ditches in terms of non-implementation of the social rights envisaged. In the end, as one of the possible solutions to the procedural crisis in complying with complex sentences in the face of the public manager, who is either weak or unfit, this paper intends to suggest its removal due to the application of what we call breach of trust in the mandate theory, a differentiated kind of subrogation applicable to the collective process. In closing to this dissertation, it is to be concluded that there is still a marked legislative and jurisprudential lacuna to address the issue involving the resistance of the Brazilian public manager to comply with sentences handed down in collective actions / A presente dissertação tem por objetivo investigar algumas deficiências e carências envolvendo o sistema processual brasileiro de cumprimento e efetivação de sentenças proferidas em sede de ações civis públicas que fixam certas obrigações de fazer em face do Poder Público, notadamente as que versam sobre a implantação de políticas públicas mediante a concretização de direitos sociais diversos. Mais que isso, tem igualmente a pretensão de apresentar algumas ponderações críticas sobre a inefetividade de algumas medidas judiciais que, tradicionalmente, são aplicadas contra o Poder Executivo para o cumprimento da ordem, o que representa uma autêntica crise da tutela jurisdicional coletiva. O acionamento prematuro e desorganizado do Judiciário pelos vários entes legitimados na tutela coletiva igualmente fragiliza o sistema de entrega de direitos sociais previstos na Constituição. É necessário o conhecimento formal e pragmático da atividade administrativa para trabalharmos o tema das políticas públicas no plano do acesso à Justiça. De fato, o mundo político-administrativo é a seara onde o Poder Executivo exerce suas atividades-fim de acordo com o painel constitucional previsto no Lei Maior de 1988. Contudo, esse mundo político-administrativo possui especificidades extremamente peculiares que acabam por representar (ainda que involuntariamente) autênticas blindagens às investidas jurisdicionais emanadas do mundo jurídico. Por isso, o operador do Direito deve ter a sensibilidade de perceber que, por vezes, haverá um verdadeiro encastelamento administrativo do ente público, culminando em fossos constitucionais em termos de não-implantação dos direitos sociais previstos. Ao final, como uma das possíveis soluções à crise processual no cumprimento de sentenças materialmente complexas em face do gestor omisso, resistente ou inapto, este trabalho se propôs a sugerir o seu afastamento em razão da aplicação ao que denominamos de teoria da quebra da confiança no mandato, uma espécie diferenciada de sub-rogação aplicável ao processo coletivo. Em fecho a esta dissertação, é de se concluir que ainda persiste acentuada lacuna legislativa e jurisprudencial para tratar do tema envolvendo a resistência do gestor público brasileiro no cumprimento de sentenças proferidas em ações coletivas

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Carlos Augusto Marcondes de Oliveira Monteiro.pdf: 1850422 bytes, checksum: 0aa420a4caf4e09cb3c47d14b2cab9e3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-10-29 / This works derives from the certainty that judicial reviews are the main cause for the delays in lawsuits, specially at the Labor Courts, in which the plaintiff or the defendant are sometimes forced to waive their rights due to such lawsuits delays. It shall discuss alternatives, in the Extraodinary Review Procedure to adjust it to the constitutional procedural principles, since in practical terms one can verify 3 judicials instances, while we maintain that the Superior Labor Court should be restricted to its role as an extraordinary instance. This is not possible when one can not distinguish the effects of an Ordinary Review from that of the Extraordinary Review. The Extraordinary Review is subject to the competence of the panels of the Superior Labor Court and applicable to review the rulings of the Regional Labor Courts on Ondinary Reviews of individual claims whenever the requirements of CLT's article 896 are present. The limitation of the applicability of the Extraordinary Review is not enough to grant TST the status of a true Extraordinary Review Court. The scope of this work is to establish the exact function of the Superior Labor Court and its efectiveness, based upon the constitutional procedural principles, specially the due process of the law and the reasonable procedural length, which comprises the effectiveness and fast-track of the procedure by analysing the effects of both Ordinary and Extraordinary Reviews / Este trabalho tem origem na crença de que os recursos são os principais responsáveis pela morosidade dos processos, mormente na justiça do trabalho, onde a parte se vê obrigada, muitas vezes, a abrir mão de seus direitos em razão da demora judicial na solução do processo. Discutiremos alternativas, no âmbito do recurso de revista, a fim de adequá-lo aos princípios constitucionais do processo, pois o que se verifica na prática é a existência de três instâncias judiciais, enquanto que defendemos que o TST deve se limitar à sua natureza de instância extraordinária. E isso não é possível quando os efeitos dos recursos de natureza extraordinária não se distinguem dos efeitos dos recursos de natureza ordinária. O recurso de revista é cabível para turmas do TST, contra as decisões proferidas em grau de recurso ordinário, em dissídio individual, pelos Tribunais Regionais do Trabalho, quando presentes as hipóteses do artigo 896 da CLT. A limitação ao cabimento do Recurso de Revista é insuficiente para transformar o TST em verdadeiro órgão de natureza extraordinária. O propósito deste trabalho é estabelecer a exata função do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho e sua eficácia, com base nos princípios constitucionais do processo, em especial o devido processo legal e o princípio da duração razoável, que engloba a efetividade e a celeridade processual, analisando os efeitos dos recursos de natureza ordinária e extraordinária

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:23:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Luciana da Silva Paggiatto Camacho.pdf: 756384 bytes, checksum: 5b8ff17557686b850a2689d108602a95 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-28 / This study aims to analyse the principle of reasonable duration of proceedings in relation to procedural reforms guarantees of access to justice, contradictory and full defense. If you live in times in which anxiety is the storm of modern society. Seeks to produce several activities simultaneously both domestic and professional; there is a plurality of activities execution and interpersonal relationships in short periods of time. So there is also the impact of this dynamic law, and therefore would not be different under the process, now more than ever it seeks to build mechanism to make the process quicker meeting the expectations of society. The objectives pursued in this work, briefly, are: (a) conceptualize principle; (b) conceptualize the principles of reasonable duration of proceedings, access to justice, contradictory and full defense; and (c) discuss the recent procedural reforms as well as on the Draft Code of Civil Procedure. As said, the topic is of paramount importance in view of all legislative reforms in the civil case and the impending enactment of a new Code of Civil Procedure, which seeks to clearly bring more promptness in support of the constitutional principle of reasonable duration of the process and bring greater effectiveness judgments. So work on screen, has the ultimate goal collate the principle of reasonable duration of the process with other basic principles and guarantees: access to justice, contradictory and full defense on an analysis of mitigation latest fundamental guarantees in the recent reforms in the speed allowance procedural / O presente trabalho tem como objetivo analisar o princípio da razoável duração do processo nas reformas processuais face às garantias de acesso à Justiça, contraditório e ampla defesa. Esta preocupação parte de um momento social no qual domina a ansiedade pela produção de diversas atividades, simultaneamente, além da manutenção de relações interpessoais em curtos períodos de tempo. Sendo o Direito reflexo da sociedade, esta dinâmica também atinge o Direito, inclusive no âmbito do processo: atualmente, busca-se construir mecanismos eficazes para atender aos anseios da sociedade. Entretanto, existem outros anseios sociais que podem ser atingidos nesta busca pela rápida prestação jurisdicional e que precisam ser tratados com cautela, como os direitos de acesso à Justiça, do contraditório e da ampla defesa. A importância do tema é explícita por estas diversas reformas legislativas no âmbito do Processo Civil e pela promulgação do novo Código de Processo Civil, que busca, com clareza, trazer mais celeridade processual em abono ao princípio constitucional da razoável duração do processo, bem como trazer maior efetividade às decisões judiciais. Mas estas decisões que atendem ao princípio da razoável duração do processo precisam considerar outros princípios e garantias fundamentais: acesso à Justiça, contraditório e ampla defesa em uma análise de mitigação das últimas garantias fundamentais nas recentes reformas em abono à celeridade processual

Die Dissertation befasst sich mit der juristischen Problematik, ob ein Rechtsbehelf anzuerkennen ist, der es Anspruchsgegnern ermöglicht, in lauterkeitsrechtlichen Unterlassungsstreitigkeiten Verfahren des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes zu initiieren. Ein solcher Rechtsbehelf ist für Anspruchsgegner bislang nicht anerkannt. Dies stellt sich als sehr problematisch dar, da Eilverfahren im Lauterkeitsrecht eine sehr hohe Bedeutung zukommt und Anspruchsgegner in diesen Verfahren signifikant benachteiligt werden. Dieser Umstand begründet auch eine erhebliche Gefahr von Fehlentscheidungen zu Lasten der Anspruchsgegner. Im Wettbewerb kann diesen Fehlentscheidungen große Bedeutung zukommen, weil durch sie beispielsweise der Vertrieb neuer innovativer Produkte untersagt werden kann. Die Arbeit kommt zu dem Ergebnis, dass ein entsprechender Rechtsbehelf anzuerkennen ist, da er dem Anspruchsgegner eine Möglichkeit verschafft, sich wirksam vor schädigenden Fehlentscheidungen zu schützen und damit der Verwirklichung der verfassungsrechtlichen Vorgaben prozessualer Waffengleichheit und effektiven Rechtschutzes dient. / The dissertation deals with the juristic problem whether a legal remedy is to be recognized which enables opponents to initiate procedures of interim legal protection in disputes regarding injunctive relief in the field of unfair competition law. Such a legal remedy is not recognized for opponents up to now. This appears to be very problematic, as preliminary proceedings are of high importance in the field of unfair competition law and opponents are being significantly disadvantaged in these procedures. This fact also founds a considerable danger of wrong decisions at the expense of the opponents. In competition these wrong decisions may be of great importance as, for example, the distribution of new and innovative products can be prohibited by them. The work comes to the conclusion that a corresponding legal remedy is to be recognized, because it provides the opponent with an effective option to protect itself from damaging wrong decisions and it serves the realization of the constitutional requirements of procedural equality of opportunity and effective legal protection.

While several Australian and international studies have explored the family lawyer-client interaction, these studies have been limited to investigations of discrete areas of the lawyerclient relationship and have been necessarily limited in their methodologies. The present study employed a quantitative empirical methodology in an Australian wide field study of 230 family lawyers and 94 clients that investigated the family lawyer-client interaction from a procedural justice framework. Using multivariate analyses, the study establishes that the Tyler and Blader two-component model of procedural justice applies in the lawyer-client dyad and is influenced by the approach of the lawyer, the emotional response of the client, and the level of co-party conflict that the client is experiencing. Further, the study gives meaning to the terms 'conciliatory and constructive' and 'adversarial' as they apply to family law dispute resolution. The study establishes a construct to measure the conciliatory and adversarial approach of family lawyers and identifies that lawyers tend to incorporate a mixture of the two into their work. The results also identify four distinct behavioural factors that characterise the two approaches: the client-centred and interest-based factors characterise the conciliatory approach; and the lawyer-directed and court-focused factors characterise the adversarial. The study found that in terms of perceptions of fairness, and feelings of satisfaction, the clients preferred the lawyers who took a client-centred and interest-based approach, but in circumstances where the clients were experiencing high-levels of conflict, or fear for the safety of their children, they also appreciated the lawyer who was lawyer-directed and court-focused. Overall, the study shows that in order to create a fair and satisfying dispute resolution service for their clients, family lawyers need to maintain a fine balance of family lawyering behaviour. On a general level, the study provides a profile of Australian family lawyers in terms of their approach to dispute resolution, their attitude towards ADR processes and their favoured negotiation styles. It also profiles family law clients in terms of their emotional adjustment to the divorce and their perceptions of the family lawyers assisting them to resolve their disputes. The study substantially expands the procedural justice theory base and has significant implications for practical family law education, government policy, family lawyering, and the ADR and collaborative law movements. The study indicates where future research could benefit these communities.

A melhoria dos serviços prestados aos jurisdicionados enfrenta um conflito entre a necessidade de se oferecer à sociedade soluções cada vez mais rápidas para os litígios por ela produzidos e a manutenção de conquistas sociais de suma importância, obtidas ao longo da história com base em grandes sacrifícios. Nesse contexto, a Emenda à Constituição n. 45, de 08 de dezembro de 2004, dentre outras inovações, acrescentou ao rol dos direitos fundamentais elencados no art. 5, da nossa Carta Magna, o direito à razoável duração do processo e aos meios que garantam a celeridade de sua tramitação, bem como passou a exigir que nos recursos extraordinários seja demonstrada a repercussão geral das questões constitucionais discutidas no caso. Esse instituto foi regulamentado pela Lei n. 11.418, de 19 de dezembro de 2006, que, contudo, não exauriu totalmente a matéria e deixou lacunas que demandam alguns questionamentos acerca de sua aplicabilidade, recaindo sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal o papel de selecionar quais temas se enquadrarão nessa nova ordem, isto é, cujos interesses ultrapassam a individualidade de cada uma das partes envolvidas nos casos concretos, o que poderá resultar no surgimento de conflitos entre o pensamento do Pretório Excelso e os interesses das partes, fazendo com que a rapidez na prestação jurisdicional oriunda de mais um dos mecanismos de filtragem processual, eventualmente possa colidir com outros direitos fundamentais já consagrados em nosso ordenamento jurídico. Saber quais são os critérios mais adotados pelos integrantes da maior Corte de Justiça do Brasil para reconhecer a repercussão geral em razão das questões relevantes do ponto de vista econômico, político, social ou jurídico, que ultrapassem os interesses subjetivos da causa reflete o objeto do presente estudo. Além disso, as decisões do STF que reconheceram a repercussão geral no segundo semestre do ano de 2010 serão analisadas, no intuito de se descobrir se apenas os aspectos legais foram adotados pelo Pretório Excelso ou se outros critérios subjetivos serviram para embasar o entendimento da Corte, revelando ser a prática do ativismo judicial uma tendência natural a balizar cada vez mais a atuação do Supremo Tribunal Federal

Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-01T18:18:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao_jorge_araujo.pdf: 569876 bytes, checksum: 5c96b320d4762bb4c0bd11320303e1a9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05-20 / The improvement of services to under jurisdiction faces a conflict between the need to offer solutions to society ever more rapidly over disputes that it produces and the maintenance of social achievements of great importance, obtained throughout history based on great sacrifice. In this context, the Constitutional Amendment No. 45, December 8, 2004, among other innovations, added to the list of fundamental rights listed in art. 5, of our Constitution, the right to a reasonable duration of the process and means to ensure the speed of its course, and began requiring in the extraordinary is that the passing of the issues discussed in the constitutional case. This institute was regulated by Law No. 11,418 of December 19, 2006, which, however, not exhausted all the matter and left gaps that require some questions about its applicability, a burden on the Supreme Court's role to select which themes are put in this new order, that is, whose interests go beyond the individuality of each party involved in specific cases, which could result in the emergence of conflicts between the thought of Praetorium Exalted and interests of the parties, causing the quickly in providing a court from increasing of filtering procedure eventually might clash with other fundamental rights already enshrined in our legal system. Know what are the criteria adopted by most members of the largest Court of Justice of Brazil to recognize the overall impact because of the relevant issues from the standpoint of economic, political, social or legal, exceeding the subjective interests of the cause of this object reflects the study. Furthermore, the decisions of the STF recognized that the overall impact in the second half of 2010 will be analyzed in order to find out if only the legal aspects were adopted by Praetorium Exalted or other subjective criteria were used to bolster the understanding of Court, demonstrating that the practice of judicial activism is a natural tendency to increasingly delimit the Supreme Court / A melhoria dos serviços prestados aos jurisdicionados enfrenta um conflito entre a necessidade de se oferecer à sociedade soluções cada vez mais rápidas para os litígios por ela produzidos e a manutenção de conquistas sociais de suma importância, obtidas ao longo da história com base em grandes sacrifícios. Nesse contexto, a Emenda à Constituição n. 45, de 08 de dezembro de 2004, dentre outras inovações, acrescentou ao rol dos direitos fundamentais elencados no art. 5º, da nossa Carta Magna, o direito à razoável duração do processo e aos meios que garantam a celeridade de sua tramitação, bem como passou a exigir que nos recursos extraordinários seja demonstrada a repercussão geral das questões constitucionais discutidas no caso. Esse instituto foi regulamentado pela Lei n. 11.418, de 19 de dezembro de 2006, que, contudo, não exauriu totalmente a matéria e deixou lacunas que demandam alguns questionamentos acerca de sua aplicabilidade, recaindo sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal o papel de selecionar quais temas se enquadrarão nessa nova ordem, isto é, cujos interesses ultrapassam a individualidade de cada uma das partes envolvidas nos casos concretos, o que poderá resultar no surgimento de conflitos entre o pensamento do Pretório Excelso e os interesses das partes, fazendo com que a rapidez na prestação jurisdicional oriunda de mais um dos mecanismos de filtragem processual, eventualmente possa colidir com outros direitos fundamentais já consagrados em nosso ordenamento jurídico. Saber quais são os critérios mais adotados pelos integrantes da maior Corte de Justiça do Brasil para reconhecer a repercussão geral em razão das questões relevantes do ponto de vista econômico, político, social ou jurídico, que ultrapassem os interesses subjetivos da causa reflete o objeto do presente estudo. Além disso, as decisões do STF que reconheceram a repercussão geral no segundo semestre do ano de 2010 serão analisadas, no intuito de se descobrir se apenas os aspectos legais foram adotados pelo Pretório Excelso ou se outros critérios subjetivos serviram para embasar o entendimento da Corte, revelando ser a prática do ativismo judicial uma tendência natural a balizar cada vez mais a atuação do Supremo Tribunal Federal

Die Dissertation befasst sich mit der juristischen Problematik, ob ein Rechtsbehelf anzuerkennen ist, der es Anspruchsgegnern ermöglicht, in lauterkeitsrechtlichen Unterlassungsstreitigkeiten Verfahren des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes zu initiieren. Ein solcher Rechtsbehelf ist für Anspruchsgegner bislang nicht anerkannt. Dies stellt sich als sehr problematisch dar, da Eilverfahren im Lauterkeitsrecht eine sehr hohe Bedeutung zukommt und Anspruchsgegner in diesen Verfahren signifikant benachteiligt werden. Dieser Umstand begründet auch eine erhebliche Gefahr von Fehlentscheidungen zu Lasten der Anspruchsgegner. Im Wettbewerb kann diesen Fehlentscheidungen große Bedeutung zukommen, weil durch sie beispielsweise der Vertrieb neuer innovativer Produkte untersagt werden kann. Die Arbeit kommt zu dem Ergebnis, dass ein entsprechender Rechtsbehelf anzuerkennen ist, da er dem Anspruchsgegner eine Möglichkeit verschafft, sich wirksam vor schädigenden Fehlentscheidungen zu schützen und damit der Verwirklichung der verfassungsrechtlichen Vorgaben prozessualer Waffengleichheit und effektiven Rechtschutzes dient. / The dissertation deals with the juristic problem whether a legal remedy is to be recognized which enables opponents to initiate procedures of interim legal protection in disputes regarding injunctive relief in the field of unfair competition law. Such a legal remedy is not recognized for opponents up to now. This appears to be very problematic, as preliminary proceedings are of high importance in the field of unfair competition law and opponents are being significantly disadvantaged in these procedures. This fact also founds a considerable danger of wrong decisions at the expense of the opponents. In competition these wrong decisions may be of great importance as, for example, the distribution of new and innovative products can be prohibited by them. The work comes to the conclusion that a corresponding legal remedy is to be recognized, because it provides the opponent with an effective option to protect itself from damaging wrong decisions and it serves the realization of the constitutional requirements of procedural equality of opportunity and effective legal protection.