- The issue of pre-trial detention in criminal procedure The topic of this diploma thesis is the issue of pre-trial detention in criminal procedure. The institute can be described as a securing institute of criminal procedural law that significantly affects the right to personal freedom of the individual, which conflicts with other human rights. In light of these violations of fundamental rights, it is not surprising that the institute is often discussed and is thus a sensitive topic. It is therefore often the subject of disputes, which are held in front of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic and other international courts. This thesis is divided into six chapters, wherein, the first part deals with the description of the institute of pre-trial detention itself, and discusses the principles that are related to it. The second chapter briefly describes the historical development of the institute of pre-trial detention on the territory of the Czech Republic since 1961, when the new Criminal Procedure Code was adopted. It emphasises the amendments No. 265/2001 Coll., and No. 459/2011 Coll., which both brought a significant change in the legal system of pre-trial detention. The third chapter focuses on the existing legislation based on case law in the Czech Republic and international courts....

1 Abstract: The issue of the concept of criminal custody The subject matter of this diploma thesis is "The issue of the concept of criminal custody". Custody being an institute of the procedure criminal law is a very problematic securing instrument that limits rights of a convicted person. Custody is often the subject of disputes which is reflected on the case decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic and on the decisions of international courts. The diploma thesis is divided in five chapters. Starting with a short introduction into the issues of custody, in the first chapter we describe its historical development in the Czech Republic and we concentrate mainly on statutory and amendatory acts after year 1989. The second chapter discusses the term and idea of custody, its purpose, main features and custody principles. The third chapter focuses on substantive enactment of custody, specifically on conditions for custody and their definitions. This chapter also includes examples of judicature of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic. Custody substitutions are also treated in this chapter as well this chapter include the new preliminary precautions. The forth chapter discusses formal legal custody right and explains the way the substantive custody rights, explained in the previous chapter,...

O presente estudo tem como objeto a análise das condições de (in)efetividade do direito da criança ser inquirida em processos judiciais por meio do depoimento especial do Poder Judiciário do Estado do Tocantins. A finalidade da pesquisa consiste em averiguar em que medida o Poder Judiciário do Estado do Tocantins está preparado para realizar o depoimento especial, quais os caminhos que vem percorrendo para tanto e quais as perspectivas para a sua implantação. Os objetivos centrais da pesquisa foram apontar a evolução histórica do tratamento jurídico dispensado à criança, inclusive na seara penal especificamente quanto ao crime de estupro de vulnerável, apresentar o método tradicional de oitiva do sujeito passivo do crime e o método do depoimento especial e, por fim, analisar da realidade atual das condições materiais e humanas necessárias à oitiva da criança pelo método do depoimento especial, na tentativa de identificar estruturas e projetos existentes no Poder Judiciário tocantinense com tal desiderato. O método de abordagem foi o descritivo; o de pesquisa, dedutivo. Informações advindas de diversas fontes oficiais de pesquisa foram reunidas, organizadas e avaliadas. Apurou-se que o Poder Judiciário do Estado do Tocantins não reúne condições materiais e humanas necessárias à implementação do depoimento especial. Concluiu-se que, apesar dos esforços e iniciativas, o depoimento especial, trazido pela Lei n. 13.431/2007, não encontra ambiente para efetiva e imediata aplicação no Estado do Tocantins, sequer a curto ou médio prazo, o que representa uma violação ao direito de a criança ser ouvida por meio do depoimento especial. / The present study has as its object the analysis of the conditions of (in) effectiveness of the right of the child to be interviewed in judicial processes through the special testimony of the Judicial Branch of the State of Tocantins. The purpose of the research is to find out to what extent the Judicial Branch of the State of Tocantins is prepared to carry out the special testimony, what are the paths it has been going through and the perspectives for its implementation. The main objectives of the research were to point out the historical evolution of the legal treatment given to the child, including in the criminal chamber specifically regarding the crime of rape of vulnerable, to present the traditional method of hearing of the subject of the crime and the method of the special testimony, To analyze the current reality of the material and human conditions necessary for the child's hearing through the special testimony method, in an attempt to identify existing structures and projects in the Tocantins' Judiciary with such desideratum. The method of approach was descriptive; the research, deductive. Information from various official sources of research was gathered, organized, and evaluated. It was found that the Judicial Branch of the State of Tocantins does not meet the material and human conditions necessary for the implementation of the special testimony. It was concluded that, despite the efforts and initiatives, the special testimony, brought by Law no. 13.431 / 2007, does not find an environment for effective and immediate application in the state of Tocantins, even in the short or medium term, which represents a violation of the right of the child to be heard through the special testimony.

Magister Legum - LLM

No description available.

The topic of preliminary injunctions (injunctive relief) in civil proceedings has not been monographically processed and published in the Czech Republic for more than one hundred years. That is in spite of the practical relevance and topical debates pertaining to the topic. A whole array of problematic questions connected to preliminary injunctions is controversial and also legal opinions in Czech commentary literature considerably diverge in respect to particular issues. The thesis offers a systematic approach to preliminary injunctions and proceedings governed by the Czech Civil Proceedings Code and the Statute on Special Court Proceedings ("OSŘ" and "ZŘS"). Attention is paid to historic developments and comparable jurisdictions (especially Germany and Austria), which are used as a reference in cases where Czech sources are insufficient. The aim of the work is to pose and answer fundamental questions of the "law of preliminary injunctions". The work deals with function, typology, relation to the proceedings based on merits, interlocutory character, limits, means, effects, particularities (such as demonstration, justification), requirements for granting and possibilities of enforcement of preliminary measures, further with relation to relative legal creatures (i.e. preliminary enforceability) and...

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:25:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Fernando Augusto Martins Canhadas.pdf: 1200571 bytes, checksum: 105372f5af7012ed8e4f2cf107a9f7d0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-03-20 / The purpose of this paper was, by systematizing some doubts still unsolved by doctrine related to the guarantees applicable to the inspection administrative proceedings, to sustain the need of attempting to the private s right to be heard on such proceedings, as an indispensable mean in the search for the material truth that, to its turn, derives directly from the so called substantive conception of the due process of law. Our main concern was to pursue solid grounds for that conclusion. In this context, the first defiance was to draw up some conceptual delimitation about the formal and the material aspects of that constitutional clause, in view of the direct correspondence between the subject of the inspection proceedings and the issues regarding the freedom and the property limitations, since such proceedings involve administrative acts enacted under the so called police power. Afterwards we elaborated our conceptual differentiation between process and administrative proceedings, based upon our interpretation that the guarantees established on article 5, LV of the Brazilian Constitution, concerning to the right of full defense and the contradiction, are only applicable to the process itself, thus characterized by a litigation deriving from a conflict of interests. On the other side we verified that the guarantees related to the substantive due process of law, such as the principles of the equity, reasonability, proportionality and of the efficacy, shall remain in the proceedings not qualified by litigation. Further, we have developed the idea of the need for such inspection proceedings and not process to serve the search for the material truth and we concluded that such constitutional clause only can be accomplished by a deep investigation of the facts analyzed. Finally, we concluded that one of the indispensable means to the exercise of this search is the actually hearing the interested private. Thus, based on a theoretical construction aiming to solve several practical cases presented as illustration, we finalized our work asseverating that, although the guarantees of full defense and the contradiction are not applicable to all types of inspection administrative proceeding including those related to tax issues resides the duty of the State to hear the privates, in return to their right to be heard / O objetivo desse trabalho foi de, sistematizando algumas dúvidas que a doutrina ainda não resolveu acerca das garantias aplicáveis aos procedimentos administrativos de fiscalização, sustentar a necessidade de atenção ao direito de ser ouvido dos particulares nesses procedimentos, como meio indispensável à busca da verdade material, que, por sua vez, decorre diretamente da chamada acepção substantiva do devido processo legal. Nossa preocupação principal foi encontrar fundamentos sólidos para essa conclusão e, nesse contexto, o primeiro desafio enfrentado foi o de traçar delimitações conceituais acerca dos âmbitos formal e material daquela cláusula constitucional, tendo em vista a correspondência direta da matéria referente aos procedimentos de fiscalização com a questão das limitações à liberdade e à propriedade, por envolver atos administrativos emitidos no chamado exercício do poder de polícia. Em seguida elaboramos nossa diferenciação conceitual entre processo e procedimento administrativo, amparada em nossa interpretação de que as garantias previstas no artigo 5º, inciso LV da Carta Magna concernentes à ampla defesa e ao contraditório só aplicam-se a processos propriamente ditos, assim compreendidos aqueles em que há litigância, decorrente de interesses contrapostos. Verificamos, por outro lado, que para os procedimentos não litigiosos remanescem as garantias decorrentes do devido processo legal substantivo, dentre as quais destacamos os princípios da isonomia, da razoabilidade, da proporcionalidade e da eficácia. Desenvolvemos ainda a necessidade de os procedimentos e não processos fiscalizatórios atenderem à busca da verdade material e concluímos que apenas por meio da profunda investigação dos fatos analisados poderia ser atendida aquela garantia constitucional. Por último, concluímos que um dos meios imprescindíveis ao exercício dessa busca da verdade material é justamente a oitiva do particular interessado. Assim, amparando-nos em construção teórica voltada à solução de vários casos práticos trazidos para ilustração, finalizamos o trabalho afirmando que, embora não lhes sendo aplicáveis as garantias da ampla defesa e do contraditório, em todos os procedimentos administrativos de fiscalização inclusive os de natureza tributária reside o dever da Administração de ouvir o administrado, em contrapartida ao direito desse último de ser ouvido

In 2020, approximately 6900 children in Sweden were relevant for investigation of custody disputes. During the same year, 1802 court decisions were enforced regarding supervision by a contact person. Previous research has shown that children often have a lack of participation and opportunity to influence in these cases. It has also shown that parental rights and the child´s need for protection often outweigh the child´s expressed will. The aim of this study was to investigate children´s participation in the district court´s judgments regarding supervision by a contact person. What an impact the child´s will have and how factors such as age, risks and their best interest affect children´s ability to be involved. Through a qualitative content analysis, nine judgments from various district courts in Sweden during 2018-2021 have been selected. The material was then analyzed with the help of social constructivist theory and Roger Hart´s ladder of participation. The study shows that in six out of nine judgments, children are involved based on different levels and that 44% of the judgments are in accordance with the child´s expressed will. However, it has been difficult to read out how the child´s will has actually had a bearing on the verdict. The result also shows that factors such as age, risks and the best interests of the child affects the child´s ability to participate. In cases where the district court has not reported the child´s will or participation, no explanation or clarification is given as to why it is so.

No description available.

As it is evident from the title, in my thesis I would like to provide an overview of the undertakings' procedural rights in proceedings under Article 101 and/or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Given the extensive investigative powers that are granted to the European Commission by the Council Regulation No 1/2003 and the consequences of being found guilty of violating Article 101 and/or 102 of the TFEU, it is necessary to ensure that the undertakings have enough ways available to exercise their right to defence and other rights and privileges guaranteed by the EU law and international treaties such as European Convention on Human Rights (e.g. the right to respect for private life). For this reason the EU law provides a range of procedural rights that should guarantee that both all the fundamental rights are observed and also serve as a system of checks and balances that prevents the misuse of the Commission's investigative powers. My thesis will focus individual rights of undertakings that are provided to them by the Council Regulation No 1/2003 and EU courts judicature. I will analyse their scope and purpose, the conditions under which they can be exercised and their limitations. Simultaneously a comparison between the rights of undertakings in the EU and U.S. legal system will...