L’homme contemporain présente une méfiance à l’égard de la parole. Il lui est difficile de trouver en elle, un outil pour établir un dialogue et se lancer vers la rencontre de l’Autre. Dans notre travail, nous abordons cette question sous l’angle d’une double triade qui articule d’un côté, Dieu - Monde - Homme et de l’autre, Création - Révelation - Rédemption. Cette double articulation est exposée dans la Nouvelle Pensée de Franz Rosenzweig, dans le Principe Dialogique de Martin Buber et dans l’appel du visage d’Emmanuel Levinas. Chacun, à sa façon, donne les implications de la parole et du dialogue dans la construction de l’altérité. En elle, la séparation des rôles, voire la pronominalité, est une condition indispensable. C’est en l’assumant que nous pourrons prendre en main un engagement éthique que soit libre de tout calcul ou de commerce de réciprocité. / Modern man has a distrust of speech. It is difficult to find in it, a tool for dialogue to engage oneself to meet the Other. In our work, we address this issue in terms of a double - triad that articulates on the one hand : God - World - Man and and on the other hand, Creation - Revelation - Redemption. This double articulation is exposed in the New Thought of Franz Rosenzweig, in the Principle Dialogic by Martin Buber and the face - to - face of Emmanuel Levinas. Each one, in his own way, gives the implications of speech and dialogue in the construction of "otherness". In it, the separation of roles, even primarily, is a prerequisite. It is by assuming that we can take over an ethical commitment that is free of any calculation or trade reciprocity.

Le travail de thèse entreprend une reconstruction critique de la philosophie politique de Leo Strauss (1899-1973) en partant de ses écrits de jeunesse allemands, replacés dans leur contexte politique et philosophique d’émergence et particulièrement dans les mouvements de la « renaissance juive » des années 1920. Au lieu de comparer son œuvre à celle d’autres grands classiques de la philosophie politique du XXe siècle ou d’analyser ces textes de jeunesse à la lumière de sa réception aux États-Unis, où lui et ses disciples sont souvent associés au mouvement néoconservateur américain, il s’agit ici de voir comment son positionnement politico-philosophique spécifique se construit dans la confrontation au « dilemme théologico-politique » dans lequel la pensée juive-allemande est prise face à la radicalisation de l’antisémitisme allemand pendant et après la Première Guerre Mondiale : judaïsme national ou judaïsme religieux ? Dans ses premiers écrits des années 1920, Strauss transforme cette opposition en celle entre Lumières et orthodoxie, entre athéisme et théisme, opposition qu’il ne cessera de vouloir dépasser à travers la construction d’un « athéisme biblique ». Nous montrons que ce n’est cependant que dans les années 1930, après son « tournant platonicien », que Strauss trouvera, par l’intermédiaire d’une nouvelle interprétation de Maïmonide, sa solution au « dilemme théologico-politique », sur des bases philosophiques pré-modernes. Avec le retour à ces Lumières platoniciennes, Strauss tente d’harmoniser Lumières et anti-Lumières, la défense du rationalisme et la justification d’un ordre théologico-politique autoritaire, projet paradoxal qui forme le cœur de son néoconservatisme philosophique. / My thesis undertakes a critical reconstruction of the political philosophy of Leo Strauss (1899-1973) on the basis of his early writings, which I contextualize in the political and philosophical frame of the Weimar Republic and the “German-Jewish Renaissance” of the 1920s. My main hypothesis is that his concept of ”political philosophy” emerges from a confrontation with the “theological-political dilemma” that German-Jewish thought faced after the First World War, the radicalization of German Anti-Semitism and the problem of being torn between national and religious Judaism. I argue that in his early writings of the 1920s, Strauss transforms this dilemma into the opposition between Enlightenment and orthodoxy, atheism and theism that he tries to overcome in the form of an “biblical atheism”. In the 1930s, after his “Platonic turn”, Strauss finds another solution to the “dilemma”, now on pre-modern philosophical grounds, through a new interpretation of Maimonides. With the return to this “platonic” Enlightenment, Strauss tries to harmonize anti-Enlightenment and Enlightenment, pre-modern rationalism and the justification of authoritarian theological-political order. My argument ist that this paradoxical project is the core of his philosophical neo-conservatism.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:55:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 394806.pdf: 571817 bytes, checksum: 4106bbd73dbb1d6be88831b03f01b759 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-08-02 / Partindo da filosofia experiencial de Franz Rosenzweig, orientados pelo m?todo anal?tico-interpretativo, buscamos compreender a problem?tica existencial do ponto de vista da multiplicidade relacional, no sentido de responder ao problema central que essa disserta??o se p?e; ou seja, qual a racionalidade proveniente da realidade experiencial e que dela poder? dar conta enquanto proposta de compreens?o dessa mesma realidade existencial. Atrav?s da an?lise interpretativa do pensamento experiencial de Rosenzweig, chagamos a raz?o relacional como proposta de realiza??o do sentido e da compreens?o da exist?ncia. Assim, somos nossas experi?ncias relacionais, enquanto essas realizam o sentido e a totalidade da exist?ncia. Da resposta a esse problema filos?fico emerge a relev?ncia dessa disserta??o, destacando os objetivos da mesma, ou seja, alcan?ar uma nova matriz epistemol?gica capaz de apontar perspectivas para a solu??o dos problemas da desagrega??o, da dial?tica conceitual entre ser e pensar e do desencantamento existencial diante da complexidade hist?rica do mundo moderno; bem como a possibilidade de pensar o processo constitutivo da consci?ncia moral diretamente ligada ? exist?ncia temporal e, assim, integrante da mesma facticidade da realidade experiencial da vida, como instante que permite uma rela??o ?tica. Desse modo, se somos nossas experi?ncias, ent?o, realizamos o sentido da exist?ncia pela viv?ncia do instante presente como fonte de cria??o da vida e momento de decis?o e op??o pela vida. Centrados na viv?ncia do presente podemos pensar um futuro enquanto mist?rio e expectativa de realiza??o e de compreens?o da totalidade da vida, onde conhecer e compreender a vida em seu sentido mais amplo significa conhecer e compreender a raz?o que permeia as rela??es experienciais desde a exist?ncia mais quotidiana at? o limite de compreens?o da exist?ncia

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T19:20:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Jose Luiz Bueno.pdf: 2863096 bytes, checksum: 79a936abdcdf5879c4b18967c97478bb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-04 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / This thesis researches how Franz Rosenzweig, the German Jewish philosopher and theologian, faces the challenges of relativism and nihilism. The works of Rosenzweig are the object of this research, especially his most important book, The Star of Redemption, along with the text named The New Thinking, whose aim was to serve as a preface to the main book and to clarify its meaning and content. Our hypothesis is that Rosenzweig´s philosophy makes itself able to face those challenges only when it assumes some categories from the traditional Jewish thinking when he makes his return to Judaism, and combines it with the existential and pragmatic sort of philosophy that he elaborates. He calls his own way of producing his philosophy as his Jewish method . This method presupposes a kind of thinking completely immersed in contingency and temporality, acknowledging the insufficiency and lack of ontological autonomy to man and also to the world and an existential attitude of walking alongside God. It also implies that one assimilates the language of Jewish tradition which will function as the means of expression of his philosophy. So, we will research Rosenzweig´s two main texts along with some supporting texts, among them some articles as well as some letters, where we can find some clarification about elements that he used to build his system of philosophy which make him able to face relativism and nihilism, and also to come up with his own form of rationality and existential attitudes. The use of traditional Jewish categories of thinking along with elements of existential and pragmatic philosophy will allow him to change the concept of nothing into a creative category and a point of departure to his own thinking. The nothing will never be a halt or an end point. Those characteristics will bestow the singularity and power of Rosenzweig´s work / Esta tese estuda o enfrentamento ao relativismo e ao niilismo empreendido pelo filósofo e teólogo judeu alemão Franz Rosenzweig. Para isso, nosso objeto de estudo é a obra de Rosenzweig, particularmente seu livro mais importante, A Estrela da Redenção, juntamente com o texto O Novo Pensamento, escrito posteriormente pelo filósofo para servir como prefácio ao seu livro principal, visando esclarecer seu conteúdo e sua estrutura. Nossa hipótese é de que o pensamento de Rosenzweig se torna apto a enfrentar aqueles desafios na medida em que assimila categorias do pensamento judaico tradicional, que o autor assume a partir de seu retorno ao judaísmo, e as concilia com a filosofia de cunho existencial e pragmático que ele elabora. A forma de produzir este seu sistema de filosofia, que o pensador chama de novo pensamento, é definida por ele mesmo como o seu método judaico. Este método implica adotar um pensamento mergulhado na contingência e na temporalidade, assumindo a insuficiência e não-autonomia ontológica tanto do homem quanto do mundo. Também significa uma atitude existencial que assume que se caminha sempre ao lado de Deus. Implica, ainda, assimilar a linguagem da tradição judaica que será o meio de expressão de seu pensamento. Assim, investigaremos os dois textos principais de Rosenzweig com o auxílio de outros textos importantes, produzidos na forma de artigos e de cartas, nos quais se pode encontrar os elementos constituintes de seu pensamento e que revelam os seus recursos racionais e existenciais para enfrentar o relativismo e o niilismo e para propor sua própria perspectiva para a racionalidade assim como para a existência. A assimilação de categorias judaicas bem como de elementos da filosofia existencial e pragmática permitirão ao autor tornar o nada uma categoria criativa e um ponto de partida de seu sistema de pensamento, jamais um fim ou uma chegada. Estas características conferirão singularidade e potência à obra de Franz Rosenzweig

Universiẗat, Magisterarbeit, 2006--Freiburg (Breisgau).

The Rosenzweig Picture Frustration Study for adults has never had any created norms in terms of Czech population. Since the time of creation its graphical stimulus material became old and nearly unusable. The purpose of this text is to show the method P-F Study to the readers and than to introduce new version for adults PFT (C-W) prepared for publication. There is also a version presented on separate cards, which is part of the new set. The validity and test-retest reliability was verified previously, but reliability was also examined by agreement of two independent evaluators. The standardisation was realized on the sample of 300 persons in age from 18 to 81 years. The new norms were created for factors, categories, S-E patterns and GCR. Also the scoring and compilation of the scoring blank was adapted. Key words: aggression, frustration, projective method, Rosenzweig P-F Study, user's manual

In this thesis I explore the relation in Buber's and Levinas's understanding. Both of these Jew philosophers endeavoured to describe an essence of genuine dialogue and both saw in dialogue the word that turns to a Thou, the primal deed of spirit. Nevertheless in spite of these similarities there are also a differences in their understanding of a dynamics within the genuine dialogue. Whereas Buber talks about a reciprocity in such a relation Levinas asserts that there is an asymmetry there and therefore he radicalizes Buber's conception and responsibility towards the other. In the first part of my thesis I focus on important influences on Buber's and Levinas' lives and introduce a "poetics" of their understanding of a genuine dialogue based particularly on their main piece of work: Buber's I and Thou and Levinas's Totality and Infinity. Although there was a communication between these two thinkers according to some philosophers it often exhibited a lack of dialogue and a failure to understand each other. Therefore I outline the similarities and differences in detail in the final chapters. Keywords Buber, Levinas, Rosenzweig, I - Thou relationship, face, reciprocity, asymmetry, responsibility, ethics, infinity

Summary: This diploma thesis deals with the relation between autoimmune processes at biological level (through proven neurological autoimmune disease - multiple sclerosis) and possible autoaggressive processes at the mental level. It is divided into several points. The first one introduces human immunity in general. The first part is followed by immune system description, including autoimmunity and the principle of diseases of this system. Thereafter, psychological aggression is described, in which the division into aggression and auto- aggression fits. This is followed by chapters on projective psychodiagnostics taking into account the detection of various forms of aggression. Then, the thesis focuses on the study of possible auto-aggressive manifestations in patients suffering from the most widespread neurological autoimmune disease, multiple sclerosis. The second half of the thesis describes the author's research on this topic.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T19:20:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Maria Cristina Mariante Guarnieri.pdf: 1263043 bytes, checksum: 5a8109dd8162f2900b878d027f998959 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-12-12 / This thesis studies angst as a religious philosophical concept beside the importance of the religious thinker as a comprehension method for religion. Regarding this, it takes as object the religious thinkers Franz Rosenzweig, Sören A. Kierkegaard and the wise man Qohelet, of the Old Testament, whose reflections indicate the presence of angst. The hypothesis that guides this work is that, in these thinkers, this presence, due to the relationship with the transcendent, manifests itself as conceptual tension which produces knowledge. In view of this hypothesis, the intention is to discuss the possibility of building knowledge from religion itself. Angst, then, is the affection that, in these authors, indicates a tension between immanence and transcendence, realizing the human finitude and the infinite possibility, the absolute lack of meaning and the establishment of a multiplicity of meanings. It is a productive agony that serves as hard task in the search for knowledge. Giving priority to the subjectivity and the concreteness of the existence, the authors here worked make an effort to understand the human being, unique is his or her suffering. The angst as key for thinking about the human condition is born from the perception of its own aporia, discovery starting from the first inquiry about the meaning of life / Essa tese estuda a angústia como conceito filosófico religioso ao lado da importância do pensador religioso como método de compreensão da religião. Para isso, toma como objeto os pensadores religiosos Franz Rosenzweig, Sören A. Kierkegaard e o sábio Qohelet, do Antigo Testamento, cujas reflexões indicam a presença da angústia. A hipótese que norteia este trabalho é que, nesses pensadores, esta presença, devido à relação com o transcendente, manifesta-se como tensão conceitual produtora de conhecimento. Face a essa hipótese, a intenção é discutir a possibilidade de construção do conhecimento a partir da própria religião. A angústia, então, é o afeto que, nestes autores, indica uma tensão entre a imanência e transcendência, entre a constatação da finitude humana e a possibilidade infinita, entre a falta de sentido absoluta e a constatação da multiplicidade de sentidos. Uma agonia produtiva que serve de árdua tarefa na busca do conhecimento. Priorizando a subjetividade e a concretude da existência, os autores aqui trabalhados se esforçam para compreender o humano que é único em seu sofrimento. A angústia como chave de pensamento sobre a condição humana nasce da percepção da própria aporia, descoberta a partir da indagação primeira sobre o sentido da vida

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T19:20:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Viviane Cristina Candido.pdf: 2573073 bytes, checksum: a7386cb9b1201ebc43e4fda03e3bf68d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-12-01 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / Objective: To propose an epistemology which establishes this subject, entailed to Religion Sciences, as an outside area, capable to offer theorical indication to the educational practice, considering the common object of study religion. Justification: Religious Teaching is an integrant part of the curriculum of basic education schools. Established as a knowledgement area, its pedagogical practice is a bearing of indefiniteness and ambiguousness related to its nature and purpose, as a result of the lack of specific theorical indications of the religious study field. Hypothesis: Religious Teaching finality is to enable to scholars an enlargement of their world view trough a biggest comprehension of religious issues, from a religion study which contributes to the comprehension and experience of the authentically human; the tension among both religious institution and experience as a methodology to religion study; an epistemology of the controversy based on the philosophy of the religion, in the ambit of Religion Sciences. Theoretical-methodological aspects and obtained result: This research let evident the ambient of controversies in which is insert Religious Teaching and its concepts related in the field of Sciences and postulated the epistemology of the controversy, based on Franz Rosenzweig thought, as a referential to the pedagogical practice of Religious Teaching. It also displayed that, once what is intended is the dialog among reason and religious reason inside school space/time, in the ambit of Religion Sciences, is the area which supports this epistemology. Using the own Rosenzweig method assigned the tension among both religious institution and experience as the methodology to the religion study in the Religious Teaching classes / Objetivo: Propor uma epistemologia que fundamente essa disciplina, vinculada às Ciências da Religião, como uma área externa, capaz de oferecer referenciais teóricos para a prática educacional, considerando o objeto de estudo comum a religião. Justificativa: O ER - Ensino Religioso é parte integrante do currículo das escolas de educação básica. Estabelecido como área de conhecimento, sua prática pedagógica é portadora de indefinições e ambigüidades relativas à sua natureza e finalidade, resultado da falta de referenciais teóricos específicos do campo de estudo da religião. Hipóteses: A finalidade do ER é possibilitar aos educandos uma ampliação de sua visão de mundo pela maior compreensão das questões religiosas, a partir de um estudo da religião que colabore para a compreensão e vivência do autenticamente humano; a tensão entre instituição e experiência religiosas como metodologia para o estudo da religião; uma epistemologia da controvérsia alicerçada na Filosofia da Religião, no âmbito das Ciências da Religião. Aspectos teórico-metodológicos e resultado obtido: Esta pesquisa evidenciou o ambiente de controvérsias em que está inserido o ER e seus conceitos relacionados no campo das Ciências e postulou a epistemologia da controvérsia, fundamentada no pensamento de Franz Rosenzweig, como referencial para a prática pedagógica do ER. Demonstrou ainda que, uma vez que o que se pretende é o diálogo entre a razão e a razão religiosa no espaço/tempo da escola, a Filosofia da Religião, no âmbito das Ciências da Religião, é a área que sustenta essa epistemologia. Utilizando o próprio método Rosenzweig apontou a tensão entre instituição e experiência religiosas como metodologia para o estudo da religião nas aulas de Ensino Religioso