Introdução: As avaliações econômicas completas do tipo custo-utilidade, suportadas por dados de efetividade do mundo real, permitem uma perspectiva diferenciada da avaliação de tecnologia em saúde. Objetivo: Realizar uma análise de custo-utilidade do uso de estatinas para a prevenção secundária de eventos cardiovasculares em portadores de doença cardiovascular isquêmica, e avaliar a variabilidade da efetividade e da razão de custo-efetividade incremental com diferentes classificações de usuários de estatina (incidentes e prevalentes). Método: Um modelo de microssimulação de Markov com 5 estados, ciclos anuais e horizonte temporal de 20 anos, com taxas de desconto de 5% foi desenvolvido. As probabilidades de transição para mortalidade por todas as causas foram extraídas após pareamento por escore de propensão dos dados e tratamento de dados ausentes de uma base secundária de registro assistencial com linkage determinístico com a base de mortalidade do Ministério da Saúde. As probabilidades dos desfechos não-fatais foram obtidas na literatura. As medidas de efetividade (QALY) foram calculadas com dados publicados dos domínios do SF-36 de um estudo realizado com a população do mesmo hospital, no mesmo período e com as mesmas condições clínicas e transformados em medidas de utilidade por modelo validado. Somente custos diretos na perspectiva do reembolso do SUS foram considerados. Resultados: 3.150 pacientes foram pareados após o escore de propensão, 1.050 não usuários de estatina, 1.050 usuários de estatinas classificados como prevalentes e 1.050 usuários de estatinas classificados como incidentes, com diagnóstico de doença cardiovascular isquêmica prévia, com seguimento médio de 5,1 anos. A efetividade das estatinas quando considerados todos os usuários em relação aos não usuários resultou em um HR para mortalidade de 0,992 (IC 95% 0,85; 0,96) e de 0,90 (IC 95% 0,85; 0,96) para os usuários incidentes. A RCEI comparando todos os usuários de estatinas versus não usuários foi de R$5.846,10/QALY e de R$7.275,61/QALY para os usuários incidentes. Conclusão: As estatinas diminuíram a mortalidade por todas as causas, e a análise incluindo usuários prevalentes diminui o tamanho do efeito. O tratamento possui custo-efetividade favorável dentro do limiar de disponibilidade a pagar definido, sendo modificado pela forma de extração do dado de efetividade / Background: The complete economic evaluations, such as cost-utility analysis, supported by real world data of effectiveness lead to a more realistic perspective of a health technology assessment. Objective: Perform a cost-utility analysis of statins for secondary prevention in ischemic cardiovascular disease patients based on effectiveness from real world data and evaluate the variability of effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) considering prevalent and incident users. Methods: A Markov microssimulation model with five states, annual cycle and time horizon (TH) of 20 years, with discount rate of 5% was developed. Transition probabilities for all cause mortality was derived from a secondary database of a teaching hospital after record linkage with national registry of mortality database and an analysis of propensity score matching and multiple imputation analysis for missing data. Non-fatal endpoints were derived from a published meta-analysis. Utility measures was calculated with a validated model to derive values from published domains of SF-36 QoL questionnaire, domains was measured for a published RCT in the same teaching hospital, over the same period, with similar age and diagnostic characteristics. Only direct costs were analyzed from the Brazilian public health reimbursement perspective. Results: 3150 patients were matched, 1050 non-statins users (CG), 1050 prevalent statins users (PSU) and 1050 incident statins users (ISU) with previous cardiovascular disease, with mean follow-up of 5,1 years. Treatment effects on the treatment group considering all statins users for all cause mortality had a hazard ratio of HR:0,992 (IC 95% 0,85 - 0,96) and HR: 0,90 (IC 95% 0,85 - 0,96) only for ISU. The ICER comparing all users with non-users was R$5.846,10 per QALY and for ISU was R$7.275,61 per QALY. Conclusion: Real world evidence demonstrated that statins are an effective treatment to reduce all cause mortality in secondary prevention and are a cost-effective strategy considering the willingness to pay established, but the prevalent users resulted in less effectiveness of the drug when included in the analysis and influenced the ICER

Clinical evidence suggested patients with lower plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after statin therapy could have better clinical outcome. The last part of the study was to measure on-treatment high sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) levels among 229 Chinese patients with hyperlipidaemia undergoing treatment with simvastatin 40 mg daily. The patients were genotyped for 15 SNPs or haplotypes in 11 candidate genes that would have significant allele frequency among Chinese patients and may be linked to statin efficacy or hsCRP levels. The analysis suggested BMI is the largest single contributing factor of 15.0% of the variation in hsCRP levels, followed by plasma triglycerides levels contributing 4.7% and male gender 1.6% (all P<0.05). However comparisons of hsCRP levels among genotype groups did not reveal any significant findings, with or without adjustment with covariate genotypic or phenotypic factors. To further categorize individuals as high or medium risk, we set a threshold hsCRP level of 1 mg/L as the benchmark for evaluation. The CRPc.3872G>A SNP was related to lower risk compared to the homozygous wild-type genotype (adjusted odds ratio AOR = 0.289; P = 0.014) after adjusting for phenotypic factors of age, gender, smoking status, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, plasma lipid profiles, co-existing disease and co-medications. Another marginal finding included the HNF1A c.79A>C SNP (AOR = 0.575; P = 0.118). / Polymorphisms in the drug transporters are likely to be more important with hydrophilic statins such as pitavastatin, which undergoes transporter mediated distribution. The SLCO1B1 c.388A>G polymorphism in the gene encoding the uptake transporter organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP1B1) is common in Chinese and the variant was associated with increases of 63--68% in maximum plasma concentration and 44--47% in systemic exposure of both the lactone and acid compared to wild-type subjects (P<0.05). Co-administration of pitavastatin with grapefruit juice (GFJ) resulted in a small increase of the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AVC) by 15--16% for both the acid and lactone (P<0.05). However, there was no significant effect on the drug-food interaction in relation to relevant SNPs in the enzymes and transporters examined. / The SNPs examined included those in the genes for the enzymes and transporters involved in the metabolic pathway or the distribution of simvastatin. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are involved in hepatic and intestinal metabolism of several statins and simvastatin is known to undergo extensive metabolism via the CYP3A4/3A5 pathway. The common candidate SNPs in the CYP3A4/3A5 enzymes found in Chinese populations include CYP3A4*1G, CYP3AP1*3 and CYP3A5*3 , which are associated with altered enzyme expression and activity. However, no statistically significant relationship was found between these SNPs and a potential phenotypic marker of enzyme activity, the urinary ratio of 6beta-hydroxy-cortisol/cortisol (6beta-OHC/C) concentrations. The analysis of lipid lowering responses in relation to individual SNPs or combinations from gene-gene interactions also revealed no statistically significant findings. In the subgroup of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia, the CYP3A4*1G, CYP3AP1*3 and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms appeared to have a small effect on the changes in LDL-C and total cholesterol with the subjects with the CYP3A5*3 and CYP3AP1*3 variants showing less reduction and those with the CYP3A4*1G variant showing more reduction than subjects with the wild-type genotype with a tendency for a gene-dose effect. It is difficult to interpret these findings and the significance may be related to multiple testing. / The statins, or 3-hydroxymethyl-3-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, act on the rate limiting step in endogenous cholesterol synthesis. Their primary action results in reduction of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and this is thought to be the major mechanism by which they reduce cardiovascular events. There are considerable differences between subjects in both the plasma levels of the statins and in their effects on LDL-C and other lipid parameters and some of this variation appears to be related to genetic differences in the pathways of drug metabolism and distribution and in the pathways involved in lipid metabolism. / The variation in response may be related to variations in systemic or hepatic exposure to the drug, which in turn will be related to the pharmacokinetics. This is also likely to play a role in the adverse effects of myopathy and therapeutic tolerance. In a pharmacokinetic study in healthy male Chinese subjects, the common polymorphism of CYP2D6*10 was analyzed in relation to the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin and simvastatin. There was a tendency for reduced clearance of simvastatin lactone by 30% (P>0.05) in subjects with the CYP2D6*10/*10 genotype. With lovastatin, there were similar findings with 38.5--84.9% decrease in clearance which appeared to be related to enzyme activity according to genotype, with *5 carriers showing a greater decline in clearance than *10 carriers (P<0.05). / These results provide some insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of statins and the pharamacogenetic relationships to candidate SNPs. Future research in this field should help to facilitate safer and more effective treatment with these commonly used medications, resulting in personalized therapy and optimal clinical benefits for patients with cardiovascular disease. / This thesis describes a study of 270 patients recruited from the outpatient clinics at the Prince of Wales Hospital who were treated with simvastatin 40 mg daily for at least 4 weeks. Their mean (+/-SD) LDL-C baseline level was 5.38+/-1.68 mmol/L and the reduction in LDL-C after simvastatin treatment was 2.81+/-0.99 mmol/L or -47.1+/-12.5%. / Mak, Wah Lun Valiant. / Adviser: Brian Tomlinson. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-06, Section: B, page: . / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2011. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 253-289). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. [Ann Arbor, MI] : ProQuest Information and Learning, [201-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstract also in Chinese.

Les données épidémiologiques montrent une association inverse entre les taux de HDL-cholestérol (HDL-C) et le risque d'évènements cardiovasculaires. Des traitements ayant montré une augmentation significative du HDL-C, comme les inhibiteurs de la protéine de transfert des esters de cholestérol, devraient donc permettre de réduire le risque cardio-vasculaire. En utilisant différentes techniques de modélisation, nous avons tenté de quantifier l'efficacité attendue sur les événements cardiovasculaires de l'un d'entre eux, le dalcétrapib, ne disposant que de données pharmacocinétiques et pharmacodynamiques. Tout d’abord, afin d'établir la relation pharmacocinétique / pharmacodynamique entre les concentrations et la modification de HDL-C, nous avons analysé les données individuelles des patients dyslipidémiques par une approche de population. Une hausse moyenne de HDL-C de 26.4 % par rapport au placebo était alors anticipée. Nous avons ensuite tenté de corréler l'effet observé sur l'HDL-C et l'effet clinique à partir de données d'autres études par méta-régression des essais évaluant l'effet des principaux hypolipémiants en prévention secondaire. Cette modélisation n'a pas permis de montrer de corrélation entre le changement de l’HDL-C (P5 P95 :-3.0 et 36 %) et la réduction du risque cardiovasculaire. Une analyse de sensibilité par type de traitement suggère qu'une même hausse de HDL-C entre deux classes thérapeutiques pourrait se traduire par un effet clinique dissemblable, indiquant que HDL-C ne peut pas être utilisé comme critère intermédiaire puisqu'il ne serait pas un prédicteur indépendant du risque cardiovasculaire / Epidemiological data demonstrate an inverse correlation between HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and cardiovascular risk. Therefore, drugs as cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors that lead to a significant HDL-C increase are believed to reduce the occurrence of coronary events. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of one CETP inhibitor, dalcetrapib, by using various modeling techniques while only pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamlc (PD) data were available. First, we analyzed individual data from dyslipidemic patients using a population approach in order to establish the PK/PD relationship between dalcetrapib concentrations and HDL-C change. The results show that an average raise of 26.4 % is expected in comparison to placebo with the 5th (P5) and 95th (P95) percentile of the mean average at 20.7 % and 31.9 % respectively. The increase in HDL-C is explained by a delayed catabolism following the transfer inhibition of cholesterol ester from HDL to Apo-B rich lipoproteins. We endeavored then to correlate HDL-C increase to coronary events by using a meta-regression analysis on randomized trials that evaluated the clinical efficacy of main dyslipidemic drugs on coronary events in secondary prevention. The modeling did not show a statistical association between HDL-C change (P5-P95:-3.0 and 36 %) and coronary risk reduction. A sensitivity analysis by drug class suggests that the same HDL-C increase resulting from different mechanisms of action may not impact the cardiovascular risk in the same way. This would indicate that HDL-C could not be used as a risk marker since it might not be an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk

Introdução: As avaliações econômicas completas do tipo custo-utilidade, suportadas por dados de efetividade do mundo real, permitem uma perspectiva diferenciada da avaliação de tecnologia em saúde. Objetivo: Realizar uma análise de custo-utilidade do uso de estatinas para a prevenção secundária de eventos cardiovasculares em portadores de doença cardiovascular isquêmica, e avaliar a variabilidade da efetividade e da razão de custo-efetividade incremental com diferentes classificações de usuários de estatina (incidentes e prevalentes). Método: Um modelo de microssimulação de Markov com 5 estados, ciclos anuais e horizonte temporal de 20 anos, com taxas de desconto de 5% foi desenvolvido. As probabilidades de transição para mortalidade por todas as causas foram extraídas após pareamento por escore de propensão dos dados e tratamento de dados ausentes de uma base secundária de registro assistencial com linkage determinístico com a base de mortalidade do Ministério da Saúde. As probabilidades dos desfechos não-fatais foram obtidas na literatura. As medidas de efetividade (QALY) foram calculadas com dados publicados dos domínios do SF-36 de um estudo realizado com a população do mesmo hospital, no mesmo período e com as mesmas condições clínicas e transformados em medidas de utilidade por modelo validado. Somente custos diretos na perspectiva do reembolso do SUS foram considerados. Resultados: 3.150 pacientes foram pareados após o escore de propensão, 1.050 não usuários de estatina, 1.050 usuários de estatinas classificados como prevalentes e 1.050 usuários de estatinas classificados como incidentes, com diagnóstico de doença cardiovascular isquêmica prévia, com seguimento médio de 5,1 anos. A efetividade das estatinas quando considerados todos os usuários em relação aos não usuários resultou em um HR para mortalidade de 0,992 (IC 95% 0,85; 0,96) e de 0,90 (IC 95% 0,85; 0,96) para os usuários incidentes. A RCEI comparando todos os usuários de estatinas versus não usuários foi de R$5.846,10/QALY e de R$7.275,61/QALY para os usuários incidentes. Conclusão: As estatinas diminuíram a mortalidade por todas as causas, e a análise incluindo usuários prevalentes diminui o tamanho do efeito. O tratamento possui custo-efetividade favorável dentro do limiar de disponibilidade a pagar definido, sendo modificado pela forma de extração do dado de efetividade / Background: The complete economic evaluations, such as cost-utility analysis, supported by real world data of effectiveness lead to a more realistic perspective of a health technology assessment. Objective: Perform a cost-utility analysis of statins for secondary prevention in ischemic cardiovascular disease patients based on effectiveness from real world data and evaluate the variability of effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) considering prevalent and incident users. Methods: A Markov microssimulation model with five states, annual cycle and time horizon (TH) of 20 years, with discount rate of 5% was developed. Transition probabilities for all cause mortality was derived from a secondary database of a teaching hospital after record linkage with national registry of mortality database and an analysis of propensity score matching and multiple imputation analysis for missing data. Non-fatal endpoints were derived from a published meta-analysis. Utility measures was calculated with a validated model to derive values from published domains of SF-36 QoL questionnaire, domains was measured for a published RCT in the same teaching hospital, over the same period, with similar age and diagnostic characteristics. Only direct costs were analyzed from the Brazilian public health reimbursement perspective. Results: 3150 patients were matched, 1050 non-statins users (CG), 1050 prevalent statins users (PSU) and 1050 incident statins users (ISU) with previous cardiovascular disease, with mean follow-up of 5,1 years. Treatment effects on the treatment group considering all statins users for all cause mortality had a hazard ratio of HR:0,992 (IC 95% 0,85 - 0,96) and HR: 0,90 (IC 95% 0,85 - 0,96) only for ISU. The ICER comparing all users with non-users was R$5.846,10 per QALY and for ISU was R$7.275,61 per QALY. Conclusion: Real world evidence demonstrated that statins are an effective treatment to reduce all cause mortality in secondary prevention and are a cost-effective strategy considering the willingness to pay established, but the prevalent users resulted in less effectiveness of the drug when included in the analysis and influenced the ICER

Introdução: A associação de uma estatina com ezetimiba é tão eficaz quanto altas doses da mesma estatina na redução do LDL-colesterol. Os efeitos que não dependem dessa redução são chamados de pleiotrópicos, entre os quais podemos citar: melhora da função endotelial, efeitos anti-oxidantes, efeitos anti- inflamatórios, entre outros. Objetivo: comparar a ação de dois esquemas de tratamento que obtêm reduções equivalentes de LDL-colesterol (sinvastatina 80 mg ao dia e associação sinvastatina 10mg/ezetimiba 10 mg ao dia), sobre os efeitos pleiotrópicos: inflamação, função endotelial e oxidação da LDL. Métodos: estudamos 23 pacientes randomizados e na forma de cross-over 2x2. A inflamação foi mensurada através da PCR-us, a função endotelial por meio de ultra-sonografia e a oxidação de LDL pelas dosagens de LDL eletronegativa (LDL-) e do anticorpo anti-LDL-. Resultados: A redução do LDL-colesterol foi similar nos dois grupos (45,27% no grupo sinvastatina/ezetimiba (p<0,001) e 49,05% no grupo sinvastatina (p<0,001), sem diferença entre os tratamentos (p=0,968)). Os dois grupos apresentaram melhora da função endotelial (3,61% no grupo sinvastatina/ezetimiba (p=0,003) e 5,08% no grupo sinvastatina (p<0,001), não houve diferença entre os tratamentos (p=0,291)). Houve melhora nos níveis da PCR-us (redução de -22,8% no grupo sinvastatina/ezetimiba (p=0,004) e de 29,69% no grupo sinvastatina (p=0,01), sem diferenças entre os tratamentos (p=0,380)). Não houve redução significativa da LDL-. Ocorreu aumento na concentração do anticorpo anti-LDL eletronegativa apenas no grupo sinvastatina (p=0,045). Conclusões: as duas formas de tratamento são eficazes na melhora da função endotelial e dos níveis de PCR-us. Somente com o uso da sinvastatina em alta dose houve aumento nos níveis de anticorpos anti-LDL-. / Introduction: The co-administration of a statin with ezetimibe is as effective as high doses of the same statin in the reduction of the LDL-cholesterol. The effects which don´t depend of this reduction are called pleiotropic effects, some among them can be cited: endothelial function improvement, antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects. Objective: compare the effectiveness of these two different treatments that obtain equivalent reductions of LDLcholesterol (simvastatin 80 mg once a day and co-administration of simvastatin 10 mg once a day and ezetimibe 10 mg once a day), about pleiotropic effects: inflammation, endothelial function and LDL oxidation. Methods: we have studied 23 randomized patients in a 2x2 cross-over study. Inflammation was measured by high-sensitive C reactive protein, endothelial function by echocardiography and LDL oxidation by electronegative LDL and electronegative anti-LDL antibodies levels. Results: the LDL-cholesterol was similar between the two groups (45,27% reduction in the simvastatin/ezetimibe group (p<0,001) and 49,05% reduction in the simvastatin group (p<0,001); no difference between treatments was found (p=0,968). The two groups had improvement in endothelial function (3,61% in the simvastatin/ezetimibe group (p=0,003) and 5,08% in the simvastatin group (p<0,001)), no differences was found between the two groups (p=0,291). High-sensitive C reactive protein had a 22,8% reduction in the simvastatin/ezetimiba group (p=0,004) and 29,69% reduction in the simvastatin group (p=0,01), with no significative difference in any of the two treatments (p=0,380). There was no significative difference in LDL- levels. The anti-LDL- antibodies concentration was increased only in the simvastatin group (p=0,045). Conclusion: the two forms of treatments presented some similar pleiotropic effects - improvement in endothelial function and decreased hs-CRP levels. Only with a high simvastatim dose the anti-LDL- antibodies concentration was increased.

Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2017-03-24T14:56:20Z No. of bitstreams: 1 josemarcosgirardi.pdf: 1287766 bytes, checksum: 075ed2df1583d07329df989c3ebc4738 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-03-27T17:36:27Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 josemarcosgirardi.pdf: 1287766 bytes, checksum: 075ed2df1583d07329df989c3ebc4738 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-27T17:36:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 josemarcosgirardi.pdf: 1287766 bytes, checksum: 075ed2df1583d07329df989c3ebc4738 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-06-09 / Alterações no remodelamento miocárdico, vascular, inflamatório, proteinúria e inflamação glomerular em ratos deficientes de óxido nítrico (NO), tratados com olmesartana medoxomila (OLM) e/ou rosuvastatina cálcica (ROS) foram estudadas após 28 dias com o objetivo de avaliar o impacto destes fármacos. Veículo (G1), Lnitro-arginina-metil-éster (L-NAME) 30mg/kg/dia (G2), OLM 5mg/kg/dia (G3), ROS 20mg/kg/dia (G4), OLM 0,5mg/kg/dia (G5), ROS 2mg/kg/dia (G6), OLM 0,5+ROS 2mg/kg/dia (G7), OLM 5+ROS 20mg/kg/dia (G8) administrados oralmente a ratos Wistar. Pressão sistólica (PS) mensurada semanalmente. Análises hematológica, bioquímica {colesterol total (CT), triglicérides (Tg), aminotransferases (AMT), fosfatase alcalina (FA), creatinina (Cr), nitrito/nitrato (NOx), Interleucina-6 (IL-6), Fator de Necrose Tumoral-alfa (TNF-α)}, urinária: {relação albumina/creatinina (RACU)}. Cortes de ventrículo esquerdo, aorta, rins (hematoxilina/eosina e Masson), analisados morfometricamente: análise transversa de cardiomiócitos (ATC), relação média e íntima sobre o lúmen arterial (MILA), fibrose perivascular de arteríolas intramiocárdicas (FPAI). Macrófagos glomerulares (MG) analisados por imunohistoquímica. L-NAME elevou a PS, ATC, MILA, FPVAI, IL-6, MG (p < 0,0001), TNFα, RACU, reduziu NOx (p < 0,01). OLM reduziu PS (p < 0,001), TNF-α (p < 0,05), IL6, ATC, MILA, FPVAIM (p < 0,0001), MG (p < 0,01), RACU (G3) (p < 0,05). ROS elevou NOx (G6), reduziu TNF-α, RACU (G4) (p< 0,05), IL-6, ATC, MILA (G4), FPAI (p < 0,0001), MG (p < 0,001). ROS potencializou efeito de OLM sobre a RACU. OLM e ROS exercem efeitos benéficos no remodelamento miocárdico, vascular, inflamatório e renal em ratos deficientes de NO. Efeitos pleiotrópicos de ROS independentes da PS e CT, mediados por suas propriedades antioxidantes / Changes in myocardial remodeling, vascular inflammation, proteinuria, and glomerular inflammation in nitric oxide (NO)-deficient rats, treated with olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) and / or rosuvastatin calcium (ROS) were studied after 28 days in order to assess the impact of these drugs. Vehicle (G1), nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) 30mg/kg/dia (G2), OLM 5mg/kg/day (G3), ROS 20mg/kg/day (G4), OLM 0,5mg/kg/day (G5), ROS 2mg/kg/day (G6), OLM 0.5+ROS 2mg/kg/day (G7), OLM 5+ROS 20mg/kg/day (G8) orally administered to Wistar rats. Systolic pressure (SBP) measured weekly. Haematological, biochemical {total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (Tg), aminotransferase (AMT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), creatinine (Cr), nitrite / nitrate (NOx), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNFα)}, urinary {albumin / creatinine ratio (UACR)}. Cuts from the left ventricle, aorta, kidneys (hematoxylin / eosin and Masson) were morphometrically analyzed: crosssectional area of cardiomyocytes (Acmy), intima-media thickness on the arterial lumen (IMT), perivascular fibrosis of intramyocardial arterioles ratio (PFR). Glomerular macrophages (GM) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. L-NAME increased the SBP, Acmy, IMT, PFR, IL-6, GM (p <0.0001), TNF-α, UACR reduced NOx (p <0.01). OLM reduced SBP (p <0.001), TNF-α (p <0.05), IL-6, Acmy, IMT, PFR (p <0.0001), GM (p <0.01), UACR (G3) (p <0.05). ROS increased NOx (G6), reduced TNF-α, UACR (G4) (p <0.05), IL-6, Acmy, IMT (G4), PFR (p <0.0001), GM (p <0.001). ROS potentiated the effect of OLM on UACR. OLM and ROS exert beneficial effects on myocardial, vascular, inflammatory and renal remodeling in nitric oxide deficient rats. The pleiotropic effects of ROS were independent of SBP and TC, mediated by its antioxidant properties.

Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerine (NTG), are widely used for their potent vasodilator capacity in the management of coronary artery disease and heart failure. Unfortunately, their beneficial effect is rapidly lost due to the development of nitrate tolerance, which is translated by an impaired vasorelaxation to NTG and an increased oxidative stress production. Although the mechanisms of the development of nitrate tolerance are still not fully elucidated, much interest has been focused in treating nitrate-receiving patients together with other drugs in order to overcome the development of nitrate tolerance. The Nitric Oxide generating enzyme, eNOS, and the superoxide anion generating enzyme, NAD(P)H oxidase, have been suggested to play a role in the development of nitrate tolerance. The aim of this study was to analyse the underlying mechanism by which ramipril, an ACE inhibitor and rosuvastatin, a new molecule of the statin class, are able to protect against the development of nitrate tolerance in the aortas isolated from rats, wild-type (wt) and eNOS-/- mice. <p>These results show that ramipril as well as rosuvastatin are able to protect against the development of nitrate tolerance in the wt and eNOS-/- mice aortas suggesting that eNOS is not necessary for their protective effect. The aortas from nitrate tolerant rats and mice showed a significant increase in the NAD(P)H oxidase activation compared to the aortas from the control and from the co-treated ramipril+NTG or rosuvastatin+NTG animals. In line with these findings were the results obtained by RT-PCR analysis: the mRNA expression of the different subunits of the NAD(P)H oxidase, such as gp91phox, p22phox, were significantly decreased after rosuvastatin or ramipril treatment in wt and eNOS-/- mice aortas. Apocynin, the NAD(P)H oxidase inhibitor was also able to inhibit the development of nitrate tolerance in the rat and mouse aortas. <p>In conclusion, these results suggest that rosuvastatin and ramipril are able to protect against the development of nitrate tolerance by counteracting the nitrate-induced oxidative stress. The mechanism of protection involves a direct interaction with the NAD(P)H oxidase pathway and seems to be completely independent of the eNOS pathway. <p> / Doctorat en sciences pharmaceutiques / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

La prévention des maladies cardiovasculaires constitue actuellement une approche capitale dans la diminution de la mortalité au sein de nos pays industrialisés. Tous les facteurs de risques étant associés à une dysfonction endothéliale, nous nous sommes intéressés à deux classes de médicaments dont l’action bénéfique se situe, du moins en partie, au niveau de l’endothélium vasculaire :les inhibiteurs de l’enzyme de conversion de l’angiotensine (IECA) et les inhibiteurs de l’hydroxy-3-méthyl-3-glutaryl-Coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) réductase (statines).<p> Le présent travail contribue à l’étude in vitro des effets protecteurs vasculaires de l’administration chronique, chez le rat, de deux statines (la pravastatine et l’atorvastatine) vis-à-vis de la toxicité aiguë des LDL humaines oxydées et vis-à-vis de la tolérance à la nitroglycérine. Une comparaison est menée par rapport au ramipril dans ces deux modèles expérimentaux.<p>Les effets de ces médicaments se manifestent au niveau vasculaire par une amélioration de la disponibilité du NO. Toutefois, dans nos modèles, des mécanismes singulièrement différents ont été identifiés entre les agents étudiés :alors que le ramipril engendre une augmentation de l’expression de la eNOS, enzyme synthétisant le NO, les statines permettent une meilleure disponibilité de ce radical par un mécanisme post-traductionnel. Outre cette action, elles semblent agir directement sur des enzymes oxydatives comme les NAD(P)H oxydases.<p>Une action antioxydante des statines pourrait expliquer tous les effets observés, ce qui n’est pas le cas pour le ramipril. Vu que le stress oxydatif intervient dans tous les facteurs de risques cardiovasculaires, diverses perspectives cliniques sont envisagées afin d’améliorer l’approche thérapeutique de la maladie athéroscléreuse.<p> / Doctorat en sciences pharmaceutiques / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

No / Although guidelines indicate when patients are eligible for antihypertensives and statins, little is known about whether general practitioners (GPs) follow this guidance. To determine the factors influencing GPs decisions to prescribe cardiovascular prevention drugs. DESIGN OF STUDY: Secondary analysis of data collected on patients whose cardiovascular risk factors were measured as part of a controlled study comparing nurse-led risk assessment (four practices) with GP-led risk assessment (two practices). SETTING: Six general practices in the West Midlands, England. PATIENTS: Five hundred patients: 297 assessed by the project nurse, 203 assessed by their GP. MEASUREMENTS: Cardiovascular risk factor data and whether statins or antihypertensives were prescribed. Multivariable logistic regression models investigated the relationship between prescription of preventive treatments and cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Among patients assessed by their GP, statin prescribing was significantly associated only with a total cholesterol concentration >/= 7 mmol/L and antihypertensive prescribing only with blood pressure >/= 160/100 mm Hg. Patients prescribed an antihypertensive by their GP were five times more likely to be prescribed a statin. Among patients assessed by the project nurse, statin prescribing was significantly associated with age, sex, and all major cardiovascular risk factors. Antihypertensive prescribing was associated with blood pressures >/= 140/90 mm Hg and with 10-year cardiovascular risk. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited, as this is a small analysis in the context of a specific cardiovascular prevention program. CONCLUSIONS: GP prescribing of preventive treatments appears to be largely determined by elevation of a single risk factor. When patients were assessed by the project nurse, prescribing was much more consistent with established guidelines.