• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 19
  • 16
  • 15
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 36
  • 36
  • 14
  • 14
  • 12
  • 11
  • 10
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
21

全球治理對國家公共政策影響之指標建構:京都議定書對台灣公共政策影響之個案分析

許耿銘 Unknown Date (has links)
在目前相關文獻中,在全球治理架構下所制定的政策,必將對於各國內部相關政策造成影響。然而,這樣的聯想常被視為是理所當然,卻鮮有實證資料,證明一個國家的公共政策在全球治理的架構下,是否真正受到影響?在哪些面向會受到影響?這些面向實際受到影響的程度為何?需要藉由何種工具,來衡量國家政策受到全球治理影響的程度? 為了解答上述之問題,本文之研究目的可歸納為以下三點: 1.經由全球治理、全球治理與國家公共政策間關係等文獻探討建立全球治理影響國家公共政策之理論架構 2.藉由理論架構與政策德菲法建立全球治理影響國家公共政策之指標系統 3.透過指標系統實證檢驗京都議定書對於台灣公共政策之影響 本研究最後獲致三大重要成果。首先,建構出全球治理影響國家公共政策之「GG-NPP理論架構」;其次,經由政策德菲法的徵詢結果,彙整出適合用以衡量全球治理對於國家公共政策影響之指標系統,共可分為三大面向、六大變數以及十六項指標。再者,透過前述的指標系統,以京都議定書為個案檢證台灣現行因應之政策。透過數據的整理,發現我國在十六項指標項目中,有十項是呈現因應京都議定書的正向趨勢;但是其餘六項指標,由於受到如主權、國際現實環境等外在因素的侷限,或者是受制於政府自己內部的組織、人事、預算、府際關係等因素,故而全球治理並未對於國家公共政策的結果必然造成影響。 / In some relative literature, we can see the policy outcomes in the national governance level “could” be affected by those in the global level. But there is little practical evidence to affirm such cause and effect. How can we evaluate exactly such relation, dimension and degree? This paper will be grouped into third parts. First, I will review the literature of global governance, the relations between global governance and public policy. By doing so, the theory framework could be formulated. Second, I will select and construct the dimensions, variables and indicators that are related to the relations between global governance and public policy. And I will check and confirm the dimensions and indicators through the “Policy Delphi” method to build the indicator system completely. Third, I will evaluate the impacts of Kyoto Protocol on public policy in Taiwan. Finally, I got three important outcomes. First, I formed a “GG-NPP theory framework”. Second, I constructed an indicator system that can be formed to measure the relation between global governance and public policy by two round “Policy Delphi” process. There are three dimensions, six variables and sixteen indicators in this indicator system. Third, I examine the indicator system by the case of “Kyoto Protocol”. I checked the impacts of Kyoto Protocol on public policy in Taiwan and found some interesting outcomes. And I knew the impacts of Kyoto Protocol on public policy will be affected by some external and internal elements.
22

幕末政局中會津藩的角色—文久三年(1863)八月十八日政變與京都守護職— / Kyoto shugoshoku in the coup on august 18, 1863

梁媛淋, Liang, Yuan lin Unknown Date (has links)
文久二年(1862)閏八月,幕府為因應惡化的京都治安以及幕權低落的窘境,於原本負責京都事務的京都所司代之上,新設京都守護職一職,任命親藩中俸祿二十五萬石的會津藩藩主松平容保(1835~1893)担任。松平容保於該年底進入京都,他不僅必須維持當地的治安,還扮演著擔任幕府與朝廷間的中間人,促進雙方友好的角色。 文久三年(1863)五月十日,主張立刻攘夷的長州藩砲擊經過馬關海峽的外國船隻,開始攘夷行動,而與外國陷入交戰狀態,但是幕府與其他諸藩卻坐視不顧,長州藩為擺脫孤立的窘境,轉而致力實現天皇親征,欲藉此促進全國各地起而響應。八月十三日,朝廷發布了天皇移駕大和(今奈良),準備親征的敕命,然而,以孝明天皇(1831~1866)為首,前關白近衛忠熙、右大臣二條齊敬等高層公卿皆主張將攘夷事務委任幕府,不願親征,並想除去與長州藩聯手,提倡親征的三條實美(1837~1891)等少壯貴族。另一方面,天皇親征的敕命會毀壞幕府受朝廷委任掌理國政的正當性,身為幕府在京都的代表,京都守護職當然不能坐視,故而決定一併剷除握有朝權的三條實美等人及敗壞治安的浪士。結果,高層公卿與會津藩聯手發動八月十八日的政變,三條實美等人則與敗走的長州兵一同返回長州。 本稿主要分析政變的實行者於政變前所做的準備,以及其於政變當天的動向。由於政變計畫案僅存與會津結盟的薩摩藩藩士的獻計文書,故先行研究皆以薩摩藩為主謀論之,認為會津藩只是兵力遭到利用的一方。然而,本論根據文獻發現,薩摩藩原本計畫八月十六日起事,卻因天皇反對而失敗。失望的薩摩藩士於是藉酒消愁,直到翌日天皇又再傳手諭,指將藉會津藩的兵力起事,才又重新振作,投入十八日的政變準備工作。由於薩摩藩的計畫於八月十六日以失敗告終,該藩在十八日政變時僅被分派守衛皇宮出入口之任務,失去掌握主導權的機會。八月十八日政變之後,孝明天皇等人取回了朝中的發言權,會津藩所代表的幕府勢力則掌握了中央政局的主導權。對此結果感到不滿的薩摩藩,因而與長州藩聯手,走上倒幕一途。如此看來,八月十八日政變的成功反而促成了薩長同盟的成立,亦成為明治維新的遠因。 / Kyoto Shugoshoku(京都守護職; the Military Commissioner of Kyoto) was created as the higher commander of Kyoto Shoshidai(京都所司代; the ambassador of Bakuhu in Kyoto), for keeping the peace in the city of Kyoto and recovering the authority of Bakuhu(幕府; shogunate). Matudaira Katamori(松平容保), the lord of the Aizu clan(会津藩), was installed as Kyoto Shugoshoku on September 24 1862, and deployed massive amounts of troops to Kyoto by the end of the year. He was not only responsible for policing the city of Kyoto, but was also expected to unify Chotei(朝廷; the imperal court) with Bakuhu. From June 25, 1863, the Choshu clan(長州藩), which insisted on expelling aliens immediately, shelled foreign ships that crossed the Kanmon Cclannel(関門海峡) and was at war with western countries. However, Bakuhu and the other clans didn’t want to open hostilities, the Choshu clan therefore became isolated. In order to cclange the miserable condition, the Choshu clan proposed that the emperor should defeat the enemy by himself, and forced Emperor Komei(孝明天皇) to announce it on August 13. Because of this, Emperor Komei and the other nobles who opposed this announcement, for example, Udaijin(右大臣; the second prime minister of Chotei) Nijyo Nariyuki(二条斉敬) and Zen-Kanpaku(前関白; previous superior regent) Konoe Tadahiro(近衛忠熙), decided to exclude the Choshu clan and young nobels like Sanjyo Sanetomi(三条実美) who took its side. On the other side, as the representative of Bakuhu in Kyoto, Matudaira Katamori had to prevent the announcement becoming true. Because he was afraid that Bakuhu shell lose the the legitimacy to reign over Japan from Chotei. That is the reason why he decided to exclude the Choshu clan and Sanjyo Sanetomi’s party. He leagued together with emperor Komei, Nijyo Nariyuki and Konoe Tadahiro, and mounted a coup on August 18. Finally, Sanjyo Sanetomi’s party ran away with the troops of the Choshu clan to Choshu domain. This study attempts to explore the position of Kyoto shugoshoku in the coup by analysis of the preparation and the movement of the administers of the coup. Because the schedule of the coup in existence was proposed by the samurais of the Satsuma clan(薩摩藩), who was associated with the Aizu clan, in prior studies, the coup was led by the Satsuma clan, and successed by using the troops of the Aizu clan. But according to the literature, the plan made by the samurais of the Satsuma clan was intending to mount a coup on August 16 and was repealed by Emperor Komei on that day. Those samurais of the Satsuma clan were frustrated and so they drunk together until the next morning. On August 18, they just ordered to guard the gate of the palace, and to forbid Sanjyo Sanetomi’s party get into the palace and let the other nobles get through the gate with using the black list of nobles which delivered by the Aizu clan. In the mean time, the Aizu clan, which recalled the troops going back to the domain and so doubled the force before August 17, was the commander for the all gates control of the palace. Moreover, Matsudaira Katamori attended the royal court for the exclusion of the Choshu clan and Sanjyo Sanetomi’s party. By these evidences I should make the assertion that the Satsuma-lead coup was ended up on August 16, and the Aizu clan was the one which having great effect in the coup on August 18. As the result, the Aizu clan had taken the leadership in the political scene for Bakuhu, so as Emporer Komei and the others retrieved their voice in Chotei.
23

從新自由制度主義分析中美因應氣候變遷議題:1992~2010 / Climate change in Sino-U.S. relations, 1992-2010: A neoliberal institutionalism approach

陳臆尤, Chen, Yi You Unknown Date (has links)
氣候變遷目前正深刻的影響人類的生活與安全,需要世界各國共同合作才有可能解決問題。有鑑於此,1992年與1997年分別制定了《聯合國氣候變化綱要公約》與《京都議定書》,期望透過國際建制來有效因應氣候變遷。然而國際氣候建制的運作不良,導致京都進程無法順利推進,第二承諾期的存續爭議也持續擴大,其中美國和中國為京都進程的阻礙因素之一。從全球二氧化碳排放份額來看,中美兩國合計共排放出超過40%的二氧化碳,顯示出美國和中國在減排行動上占有相當重要的角色。   換言之,在氣候變遷的時代下,中美攜手氣候合作不僅是可能的也是必須的。本研究利用新自由制度主義作為研究途徑,分析自1992年訂定《聯合國氣候變化綱要公約》以來,中國和美國的氣候互動與合作,並探討兩國在氣候議題上,是否合作關係大於競爭關係。儘管自1979年起,兩國即已開始進行氣候與能源合作,但直到歐巴馬總統上任後,中美才開始大動作的進行氣候協商。在應對氣候變遷的問題上,兩國共同擁有三大目標:減緩全球暖化、促進經濟發展與維護能源安全。因此,中美都了解到清潔能源的合作領域為兩國共同利益,即便在氣候合作上還存在著許多障礙,雙方還是願意採取互惠的手段,共同創造一個雙贏的局面。
24

清潔發展機制之國際政治經濟學分析:以歐盟與中國為例 / An international political economy analysis of the clean development mechanism: A comparative study of the EU and China

陳俊仰, Chen, Chun Yang Unknown Date (has links)
清潔發展機制作為京都議定書中的一種彈性機制,普遍被認為將為溫室氣體排放減量所引起的「環境保護─經濟發展」與「北─南」衝突帶來雙贏的結果。支持者認為,其為附件一締約方提供達成溫室氣體減排經濟成本較低的方法,也同時為非附件一締約方引進資金與技術。然而,本研究運用國際政治經濟學的分析,提出因為各自要素禀賦的不同,清潔發展機制實行後的利弊損益將不會公平的分配於清潔發展機制項目的投資方與東道方間,因而導致某些負面的效果:其將阻礙投資方境內減排措施的推動,與導致東道方在技術上的依賴。而透過對投資方與東道方內部排放權提供者與技術研發者間互動的分析,再輔以中國與EU-15的實證資料,可以證實本研究的假設並較為清楚地說明其背後之原因。最後,本研究將討論中國政府與EU-15各自如何以政治力介入市場機制的運作,以試圖處理這樣市場機制運作所導致的弊病。 / Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) as a Kyoto flexible mechanism was believed to provide a win-win solution to the conflicts, which result from cutting down greenhouse gas emissions, between wheather ecology & economy or North & South. The proponents believe the implementation of CDM is cost-efficient for the Annex I Parties to achieve their Kyoto commitments and can also introduce capital & technology into the non-Annex I Parties. However, by international political economic analysis, the difference in factors endowments between CDM invest parties and host parties will result in unequal distribution of gains & pays between them. This causes some negative effects: CDM will deter the implementation of domestic emissions reduction in the invest parties, and it will also make technological dependence in the host parties. Through analyzing the interactions between emission allowance providers & technology innovators in the invest & host parties and with empirical data from China & EU-15, the assumptions of this study is proved and the causation is clarified. At last, the governmental interventions, which are trying to modify the negative effects result from the operation of market mechanism, by China and EU-15 are brought into discuss perspectively.
25

環境安全與國際建制-氣候安全建制之探討

蔣欣如, Chiang,Hsin-ju Unknown Date (has links)
「安全」問題一直是國家不斷追求的利益,但相較於傳統安全問題,更多新的安全議題已浮上檯面。在新興的眾多非傳統安全議題之中,環境安全(Environmental Security)是相當重要的面向,乃由於環境的改變、破壞、退化,形成人類經濟活動、國家安全、國際和平的隱憂。面對如此的潛在危機,國際社會目前普遍已經體認到環境安全的重要性,也逐漸傾向尋求另一種不同於軍事武力的解決方案,有意願合作建立共同規範準則以面對問題,因而促成環境安全建制的成形。   本論文以「氣候變遷」議題做為環境問題的代表,回顧自1972年以來,以國家為主要行為者的全球多邊環境協定,探討氣候安全的特點及氣候建制的限制。同時採用「知識社群模式」與「制度議價途徑」的論點解釋環境建制的成因,前者影響國際社會對環境問題的共識、原則建立;後者則影響國家參與共同建制與制定、執行規範的意願。   雖然全球氣候治理的《京都議定書》已正式上路,氣候相關建制也都注重平等、公正、效率、補償等原則,力求使國際社會每個國家立足平等並有足夠的能力解決問題,但因為國家最終考量仍是自身利益,國際社會各行為者所重視的是平等而不損及利益的制度安排。所以,要建立有效的環境安全建制,首先要解決環境安全與經濟發展互相矛盾的困境,其次要調和國際社會成員的利益問題,需要各國共同努力,才能真正使環境建制的功能發揮到最大。
26

Effective Delayed Neutron Fraction in Subcritical States / 未臨界状態における実効遅発中性子割合に関する研究

Yamanaka, Masao 23 March 2017 (has links)
京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(エネルギー科学) / 甲第20483号 / エネ博第352号 / 新制||エネ||70(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院エネルギー科学研究科エネルギー基礎科学専攻 / (主査)教授 三澤 毅, 教授 宇根﨑 博信, 准教授 卞 哲浩 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Energy Science / Kyoto University / DFAM
27

中世後期京都支配体制の研究

松井, 直人 25 March 2019 (has links)
京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(文学) / 甲第21486号 / 文博第791号 / 新制||文||671(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院文学研究科歴史文化学専攻 / (主査)教授 上島 享, 准教授 谷川 穣, 准教授 三宅 正浩 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Letters / Kyoto University / DGAM
28

中世後期における寺社参詣の研究 : 京都の寺社と参詣者 / チュウセイ コウキ ニオケル ジシャ サンケイ ノ ケンキュウ : キョウト ノ ジシャ ト サンケイシャ

川嶋 美貴子, Mikiko Kawashima 20 March 2017 (has links)
序章 寺社参詣史研究の現状と課題 Ⅰ 寺社参詣をめぐる風俗と信仰(第一章 中世後期における公家の寺社参詣、第二章 中世後期における誕生日と寺社参詣、第三章 中世後期における「氏神」信仰と参詣) Ⅱ 参詣者を受容する寺院の動向(第四章 京都「木屋薬師堂」考、第五章 朱雀権現堂の中興) 終章 中世後期における寺社参詣の研究―結論と今後の展望― / 博士(文化史学) / Doctor of Philosophy in History / 同志社大学 / Doshisha University
29

自己否定する主体―1930年代「日本」と「朝鮮」の思想的媒介

カク, ミンソク 23 March 2023 (has links)
京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(人間・環境学) / 甲第24688号 / 人博第1061号 / 新制||人||249(附属図書館) / 2022||人博||1061(吉田南総合図書館) / 京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科共生文明学専攻 / (主査)教授 小倉 紀蔵, 教授 細見 和之, 准教授 津守 陽, 准教授 福谷 彬, 非常勤講師 廖 欽彬 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Human and Environmental Studies / Kyoto University / DGAM
30

天皇家ゆかりの文庫・宝蔵の目録学的研究

田島, 公 25 March 2024 (has links)
京都大学 / 新制・論文博士 / 博士(文学) / 乙第13594号 / 論文博第674号 / 京都大学大学院文学研究科国史学専攻 / (主査)教授 吉川 真司, 教授 上島 享, 准教授 三宅 正浩 / 学位規則第4条第2項該当 / Doctor of Letters / Kyoto University / DGAM

Page generated in 0.0274 seconds