點雲（point cloud）為以大量三維坐標描述地表實際情形的資料形式，其中包含其三維坐標及相關屬性。通常點雲資料取得方式為光達測量，其以單一波段雷射光束掃描獲取資料，以光達獲取點雲，常面臨掃描時間差、缺乏多波段資訊、可靠邊緣線及角點資訊、大量離散點雲又缺乏語意資訊（semantic information）難以直接判讀及缺乏多餘觀測量等問題。 攝影測量藉由感測反射自太陽光或地物本身放射之能量，可記錄為二維多光譜影像，透過地物在不同光譜範圍表現之特性，可輔助分類，改善分類成果。若匹配多張高重疊率的多波段影像，可以獲取包含多波段資訊且位於明顯特徵點上的點雲，提供光達以外的點雲資料來源。 傳統空中三角測量平差解算地物點坐標及產製數值表面模型（Digital Surface Model, DSM）時，多採用可見光影像為主；而目前常見之高空間解析度數值航照影像，除了記錄可見光波段之外，亦可蒐集近紅外光波段影像。但較少採用近紅外光波段影像，以求解地物點坐標及建立DSM。 因此本研究利用多波段影像所蘊含的豐富光譜資訊，以取像方式簡易及低限制條件的近景攝影測量方式，匹配多張可見光、近紅外光及紅外彩色影像，分別建立可見光、近紅外光及紅外彩色之DSM，其目的在於探討加入近紅外光波段後，所產生的近紅外光及紅外彩色DSM，和可見光DSM之異同；並比較該DSM是否更能突顯植被區。 研究顯示，以可見光點雲為檢核資料，計算近紅外光與紅外彩色點雲的均方根誤差為其距離門檻值之相對檢核方法，可獲得約21%的點雲增加率；然而使用近紅外光或紅外彩色影像，即使能增加點雲資料量，但對於增加可見光影像未能匹配的資料方面，其效果仍屬有限。 / Point cloud represents the surface as mass 3D coordinates and attributes. Generally, these data are usually collected by LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging), which acquires data through single band laser scanning. But the data collected by LIDAR could face problems, such as scanning process is not instantaneous, lack of multispectral information, breaklines, corners, semantic information and redundancies. However, photogrammetry record the electromagnetic energy reflected or emitted from the surface as 2D multispectral images, via ground features with different characteristics differ in spectrum, it can be classified more efficiently and precisely. By matching multiple high overlapping multispectral images, point cloud including multispectral information and locating on obvious feature points can be acquired. This provides another point cloud source aparting from LIDAR. In most studies, visible light (VIS) images are used primarily, while calculating ground point coordinates and generating digital surface models （DSM） through aerotriangulation. Although nowadays, high spatial resolution digital aerial images can acquire not only VIS channel, but also near infrared (NIR) channel as well. But there is lack of research doing the former procedures by using NIR images. Therefore, this research focuses on the rich spectral information in multispectral images, by using easy image collection and low restriction close range photogrammetry method. It matches several VIS, NIR and color infrared (CIR) images, and generate DSMs respectively. The purpose is to analyze the difference between VIS, NIR and CIR data sets, and whether it can emphasize the vegetation area, after adding NIR channel in DSM generation. The result shows that by using relative check points between NIR, CIR data with VIS one. First, VIS point cloud was set as check point data, then, the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) of NIR and CIR point cloud was calculated as distance threshold. Its data increment is 21% ca. However, the point cloud data amount can be increased, by matching NIR and CIR images. But the effect of increasing data, which was not being matched from VIS images are limited.

University of Macau / Faculty of Education

臺灣之地籍圖，乃係承襲自1903年日治時期所測製完成而以人工方式謄繪的地籍副圖，經國民政府於1945年接收後，由本省各地政事務所延續使用迄今，其齡高達103歲，為我國現今以圖籍記錄人民財產權範圍的唯一原始依據。 / 但日治土地調查規則早於1898年7月的前清時期即已制定，而土地法及其施行法係國民政府在1936年3月訓政時期所令頒施行的產物，兩者法制規範相隔達40年之遙，何以在不同政體下各所依據之法理卻能取得一致？否則臺灣地籍圖依法即無立錐之地。由於歷史承接，混沌不明，以致成為謎樣的年代，相關研究普遍缺乏深入分析，本文為使原貌重現，填補歷史影像，故為論述傾注重心。 / 臺灣省行政長官公署在光復初期，認為：日治時期臺灣省地籍測量與地籍調查之程序與精度符合我國土地法規定，故免予重辦地籍測量，並以局部改正之「修補」方式替代「整理」地籍，一舉完成臺灣土地總登記。 / 事實上，透過我國土地法典分析，雖然日治地籍測量外觀上之「程序」符合土地法第44條之規定，但深入剖視後，其「實體」部分則完全無法見容於我國地籍測量法制規範，縱使1945年5月間存置於臺灣總督府之日治地籍原圖未遭炸燬滅失，仍不能治癒其在法制上之闕失病症。 / 臺灣光復後未及數載，圖籍病態逐漸接踵浮現，已難再掩飾其症，非重新「改測」無以回春。惟臺灣省政府自民國45年度起實施地籍圖修正測量至64年度止之試辦地籍圖重測，在長達二十年間的臺灣圖籍重建工作，竟係處於無法律明文依據之情況下所進行，除明顯未臻妥適之外，更不符「法律保留」原則。 / 迨1975年7月間修正土地法，增訂第46條之1、第46條之2、第46條之3等三個條文，始為臺灣地籍圖重測建構法制根基。但由於立法層面思慮不盡周全，形成重大缺漏，非僅未能有效釐整地籍，反因重測地籍調查指界衍生出更進一步的爭議。諸如：到場指界者顯然逾越至毗鄰未到場之土地所有權支配範圍、抑或毗鄰未登記土地時，剝奪私有地之指界權，但公有土地則自成免疫系統排除法規範約制、甚至限縮各土地共有人依法均得單獨指界之權利及義務、…等多項法制闕失，主管機關仍縱任三十年而未正視，與憲法保障人民財產權意旨似相背違。 / 由於臺灣省猶有高達400萬筆以上之土地，亟待實施地籍圖重測，仍須面對上述各項法律疑義癥結；因此，歸結本研究結果，提出改進方向及相關條文之修法建議，為未來地籍圖重測，尋覓出賡續發展之經營脈絡。 / The Taiwan Cadastral map adopts basically the code of Japanese statutes, which is a manually drawn copy of the cadastral map of a cadastral surveying project completed in 1903 under the Japanese statutes. Since the time it was received by the R.O.C. central government in 1945, it has been used by the various local offices of land administration ever since. It is 103 years old and is now the only original foundation being used as the map document recording the scope of people’s property right. / But the land survey regulations under the Japan statutes was enacted back in July 1898 during the period of the Ching Dynasty, while the land law and its implementation regulation were enacted in March 1936 during the period of political tutelage. There were 40 years between the times of enactment of the two laws, but how could the bases of law principles under different political entities be coinciding? Otherwise, the Taiwan Cadastral map would have no ground to stand. Because of the historical transitions, information and data are indefinite, which was a time of ambiguity. Besides, the related researches are generally lack of in-depth analyses. In order to reappear the original look and to supplement historical images, this writing places great emphases on the studies. / In the early stage of the retrocession, the administrative chief office of Taiwan province deemed that the procedure and accuracy of the Taiwan cadastral survey and cadastral investigation under the Japan statutes were in compliance with the regulations of our country’s land law. Therefore, a second cadastral survey was not needed, and took the way of partial “supplement” instead of “overhaul” of the land file, thus the general Taiwan land registration was completed with a single blow. / In fact, through an analysis of land law of this country, though the “procedure” of cadastral survey under the Japan statutes is in compliance with the regulation of article 44 of the land law; when it is paid an important examination, its “entity” is completely unacceptable to the regulations of our cadastral survey law. Although the original cadastral map of the Japan statutes placed in the Taiwan Viceroy office did not destroyed or damaged by the bombing in May 1945. it would not cure the diseases of the legal system. / In a few years after the Taiwan retrocession, the flaws of the land file began to emerge. It is impossible to cover any more the defects, and the only way to get its healthy condition back was a new “corrective survey.” However, the Taiwan Provincial Government implemented a trial new cadastral survey from 1956 to 1975 for a corrective survey. During the 20-year long Taiwan cadastral reconstruction operations, it was inappropriately conducted under a condition without a legal written basis, which is obviously improper and let alone the principle of “Gesetzesvorbehalt.” / It was not until July 1975 when the Land Law was amended with the addition of Article 46.1, Article 46.2, and Article 46.3, the reconstruction of Taiwan Cadastral map was established. Nevertheless, the considerable flaws were resulted due to the incomplete planning and research in the legislate area beforehand. Not only the operations of survey and reconstruction were not effectively performed, but also more controversial issues were produced. For instance, the present landmark indicator obviously goes beyond the boundary to the neighbor land ownership control scope of the absent one; or to deprive the landmark indicating right of private property while the neighbor scope is not property registered. On the contrary, the public property with what is called immune system, is free of the legal constraint of regulations and rules, and further to limit or minimize the legal rights and obligations of single landmark indicating of joint tenants, etc. Such numerous lawful defects are intentionally ignored by the responsible authorities for as long as thirty years, which is apparently against the purpose of protect the people’s property right of the Constitution. / There are more than 400 million land cases in Taiwan demanding a second cadastral survey, with the objective to resolve the above-mentioned crucial problems. To summarize the research result, a correct direction for future development and improvement, as well as some suggestions for amendment of related articles and clauses are consequently presented, with the objective to perform continuous advancement and operation of prospective cadastral survey.

本研究以修改傳統 模型為出發點，探討基金經理人所具備的動態行為特質。傳統模型重點主要放在經理人對於市場報酬率走勢的預期，並未考慮到其對市場未來波動性走勢的預期能力。因此本文認為有失偏頗。故研究方法即加入波動擇時能力特質進入模型，希望能強化傳統模型的擇時能力表現，以更完整地建立有關經理人擇時能力的資訊。 本研究採用三十支國內股票型共同基金為研究樣本。研究期間為2001//7/1~2005/6/30四年。利用日資料方法來補捉基金經理人每日動態特質，並且建立了隨機投資組合作為比較基準點，期望能更客觀的分析經理人是否具備優良從事交易策略的能力。 研究結果發現，研究樣本的基金經理人，以三因子或單因子模型分析，多數經理人具備波動擇時能力，但是報酬擇時能力並不顯著。這說明國內共同基金經理人在面對股市的未來報酬高度不確定性，會重視高波動所帶來的高風險。故會在未來走勢高波動時，適時的減少市場風險曝露及投資部位。 另外，研究結果也發現，當模型中異常報酬考慮到市場上波動時，基金經理人波動選股能力係數並不顯著，故無法說明其會隨著市場波動性改變，而運用選股能力強化績效，創造基金異常報酬。

臺灣光復初期，政府受限於人力、物力，並未重新實施地籍測量，即沿用日治時期既有之地籍圖冊辦理地籍管理，惟歷年來既存圖簿面積不符之課題，今日為民眾所放大檢視，其衍生之疑義已持續擴張、浮現；而因應現實環境之需所制定的法規，於時、空間的變遷及人民產權意識的高漲，亦日趨模糊，致難以適從。 本文同時就圖解複丈辦理之疑義及更正登記遭遇之課題等考量，由臺灣地籍的演進，先行釐清面積不符之肇因，次就錯誤型態的認定以及補償制度的研擬，而為處理程序之建構，最後經由實務上之個案分析進一步研擬對策，並律定標準作業程序；另針對地籍測量實施規則第232條規定之測量錯誤更正沿革加以深論，並歸納研究結果，提出修法建議，以化解民眾的質疑及不信任。 經研究發現，既存面積不符之錯誤，於複丈或重測前難以先行釐正，乃因現行更正規定未臻明確，恐有逾越法律授權範圍。故由處理程序之建構，得以對其錯誤型態之認定能有所區分，並從補償面向的先行考量，以減少事後賠償之紛爭。另外，除循修法方向強化現行更正規定之意涵外，經由標準化作業程序之律定，至少可達至程序正當性的要求，使類似情事得以按部就班順利進行，不再各自摸索自謀解決，避免其他問題衍生。 / At the early period after Taiwan Restoration, due to the limited human resource and material resource, Taiwan government implemented cadastral management based on the cadastral maps produced during Japanese colonization rather than carry out new cadastral surveys. The issue of existed incorrect land area has been magnified today, and the extended doubts constantly emerged. Regulation, which should be made by real need, becomes blurred and hard to follow as temporal and spatial changes and property rights rises. This paper discusses the doubts of land revision with digitalized map and the registration corrections. First, clarify the causes of incorrect land area through the cadastral maps revolution, and then construct process procedures based on the identification of land error type and development of compensation system. Finally, create standard process procedures through real case analysis. Moreover, to reduce public doubts and distrust as well as to avoid go to law easily, this article deals with the past history of corrections of cadastral survey on Article 232 Directions for Implementation of Cadastral Survey, and conclude research results and propose suggestions for amendments to relative articles. The results show that the existed incorrect land area is hardly to correct before cadastral resurveys because of the unclear regulations of corrections. However, land error type can be identified by applying process procedures. It is suggested to put compensation on priority consideration to decrease possible disputes. In addition, except for strengthen current regulation by law modification; the creation of process procedure could at least achieve legitimacy. The similar cases can follow it step by step and avoid extended problems.

本研究乃依據家庭系統理論的觀點，欲探討家庭分化的測量問題與內涵，以企圖進行不同成員間觀點的測量與相關問題探討。其以「起飛期家庭」之在大學就讀學生為主要測量中心，但測量單位以家庭為單位，包括起飛期家庭中的大學生或研究生、父、母等三人，正式研究結果共蒐集到77個家庭的分化資料。主要研究結果可分成六個方面： 第一，研究發現成員間同時具備「一致性」與「不一致性」的現象，此種「同中有異」、「異中有同」的系統特性，反映出系統測量時的獨特之處，在此方面的重要結果包括1.系統不一致性的現象受到不同家庭分化議題的影響；2.孩子與父母間對於「父母關係」中的分化內涵有較大的不一致性；3.父親與孩子之間對於「親子關係」的分化內涵有較大的不一致性；4.母親與孩子以及母親與父親間在不同雙人關係的分化內涵上，有較多的一致性；5.母親與女孩比母親對男孩之間有較多「情感共振」的糾葛；6.系統的一致性表現受到不同雙人組合方式以及不同分化內涵而有所差異。 第二，在驗證系統理論方面，其結果包括1.家庭系統中不同成員對分化的內涵總和不等於系統本身的分化內涵；2.家庭整體性並不能成功的被驗證，但父子次系統、母子次系統、父母次系統確實存在；3.驗證父子次系統、母子次系統、父母次系統之間具有相關連性。 第三，在多元化的測量內涵上，研究發現，原本Wood所發展出的接近性分化內涵並不能夠清楚的被驗證，但以「情感共振」與「干涉侵權」兩大因素之架構，可發現較適配的因素架構，而「情感共振」因素較適合進行整體系統的測量。 第四，在多元化測量面向中之不同對象上，發現進行家庭系統測量時，其測量單位應以「整個家庭」為單位，故測量對象應包括父、母、子三者，所獲得的資料會更接近系統系也更加豐富。 第五，在多元化測量面向中之不同次系統上，進行家庭系統測量時，必須將不同次系統分開測量，且不同次系統所著重的分化內涵之議題可能有所不同，而每個成員對於不同次系統之知覺分化內涵也可能有所不同，尤其是在「親子關係」和「夫妻關係」、以及「母子關係」與「母女關係」有顯著不同的分化內涵。 第六，在家庭系統分析方法上，不同成員間觀點之差異性是確實存在的，若使用「平均數法」與「差異數法」，則可能消弭了成員間的不一致性，故過去傳統使用「平均數法」與「差異數法」處理系統資料是較不適合的。 最後針對此研究結果，討論系統測量時的原則與方法，以及在實務上的啟發與建議。

當線性模型中包含隨機效果項時，若將之視為固定效果或直接忽略，往往會造成嚴重的推測偏差，故應以混合線性模型為架構。若模式中只包含一個隨機效果項，則模式中有兩個變異數成份，若包含 個隨機效果項，則模式中有 個變異數成份。本論文主要在介紹至少兩個變異數成份時固定效果及隨機效果線性組合的最佳線性不偏推測量（BLUP），及其推測區間之推導與建立。然而BLUP實為變異數比率的函數，若變異數比率未知，而以最大概似法（Maximum Likelihood Method）或殘差最大概似法（Residual Maximum Likelihood Method）估計出變異數比率，再代入BLUP中，則得到的是經驗最佳線性不偏推測量（EBLUP）。至於推測區間則與EBLUP的均方誤有關，本論文先介紹如何求算其漸近不偏估計量，再介紹EBLUP之推測誤差除以 後，其自由度的估算方法，據以建構推測區間。 / When random effects are contained in the model, if they are treated as fixed effects or ignore, then it may result in serious prediction bias. Instead, mixed linear model is to be considered. If there is one source of random effects, then the model has two variance components, while it has variance components, if the model contains random effects. This study primarily presents the derivation of the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) of a linear combination of the fixed and random effects, and then the conduction of the prediction interval when the model contains at least two variance components. However, BLUP is a function of variance ratios. If the variance ratios are unknown, we can replace them by their maximum likelihood estimates or residual maximum likelihood estimates, then we can get empirical best linear unbiased predictor (EBLUP). Because prediction interval is relating to the mean squared error (MSE) of EBLUP, so the study first introduces how to get its approximate unbiased estimator, m_a , then introduces how to evaluate the degrees of freedom of the ratio of the prediction error for the EBLUP and m_a ^1/2 , in order to use both of them to establish the prediction interval.

筆者在這篇論文中所要說明的是：慈善原則（Principle of Charity）在戴維森（Donald Davidson）詮釋理論中的必要性。 在本篇論文中，筆者並不刻意的採取支持或是反對的立場。筆者所要做的是，以戴維森的角度著眼，並進而探討為什麼對於戴維森而言，慈善原則是其詮釋理論中一個極為重要的主張，並且，是一個無法避免的一個預設。在此，我們將說明此原則所涉及的實質內容與作用是什麼，以及戴維森是如何證成此原則的。 嚴格的來說，慈善原則並不是一個單一的主張，而我們是無法以一個簡單的主張或內容界定之。雖然這個原則無法以一個簡單的主張或內容來含括說明，但是，它的內容至少必須是「假定言說者的信念大體上是真的，並且是與詮釋者的（基本）信念是相一致的。」 慈善原則在戴維森的詮釋理論中不僅僅對我們的經驗做出某些要求，而且此原則還是一個先驗的原則。它所涉及的範圍包括了我們的信念、欲望、意義以及行動的部分。 從詮釋理論的角度來看，慈善原則所允許的是，在不同的語言之間者，我們依然能夠進行了解以及溝通的工作。這個原則所要求的是，我們必須將我們的詮釋對象視為大體上與我們的理性是相一致的。換而言之，詮釋者必須假設與被詮釋者之間，擁有基本的理性模式。在這個先驗原則的要求與限制下，包含了一個對詮釋理論的限制，而其所依據的亦即是慈善原則。 在本篇論文的鋪陳上，將分為三個章節來說明其所主張的觀點。筆者希望能夠透過上述各個章節的鋪陳，而展示出慈善原則在戴維森的詮釋理論中為什麼是不可避免的預設，以及這個主張的實質作用為什麼涉及了信念、欲望、意義以及行動的部分。最後，我們將以「三角測量隱喻」（triangulation metaphor）初步的證成此原則。首先，要知道的是，我們可以把戴維森的詮釋理論視為是真理理論，意義理論以及行動理論相互連結的理論，此三個要素在戴維森的詮釋理論是相互依存但卻不同的詮釋要素。我們將在第一章的討論內容中說明真理理論與意義理論的部分。在此，將可以看到戴維森的詮釋理論是由語意的形式結構把握語言的意義，並採取外延（extension）的進路表明公共且客觀的世界是個人信念和語言的主題所在； 而在第二章以及第三章的內容說明中，其所關連到的是意義理論以及信念理論的部分。同時，這亦即是是本篇論文所要處理的重點-----徹底詮釋的討論。在這部分的討論上，戴維森訴諸意義的經驗證據，他認為信念內容和語言意義得根據共同生活的人的思想內容、意向性行動等等。

本論文探討當自變數存在測量誤差時，羅吉斯迴歸模型的估計問題，並將此結果應用在電腦化適性測驗中的線上校準問題。在變動長度電腦化測驗的假設下，我們證明了估計量的強收斂性。試題反應理論被廣泛地使用在電腦化適性測驗上，其假設受試者在試題的表現情形與本身的能力，可以透過試題特徵曲線加以詮釋，羅吉斯迴歸模式是最常見的試題反應模式。藉由適性測驗的施行，考題的選取可以依據不同受試者，選擇最適合的題目。因此，相較於傳統測驗而言，在適性測驗中，題目的消耗量更為快速。在題庫的維護與管理上，新試題的補充與試題校準便為非常重要的工作。線上試題校準意指在線上測驗進行中，同時進行試題校準。因此，受試者的能力估計會存在測量誤差。從統計的觀點，線上校準面臨的困難，可以解釋為在非線性模型下，當自變數有測量誤差時的實驗設計問題。我們利用序貫設計降低測量誤差，得到更精確的估計，相較於傳統的試題校準，可以節省更多的時間及成本。我們利用處理測量誤差的技巧，進一步應用序貫設計的方法，處理在線上校準中，受試者能力存在測量誤差的問題。 / In this dissertation, we focus on the estimate in logistic regression models when the independent variables are subject to some measurement errors. The problem of this dissertation is motivated by online calibration in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT). We apply the measurement error model techniques and adaptive sequential design methodology to the online calibration problem of CAT. We prove that the estimates of item parameters are strongly consistent under the variable length CAT setup. In an adaptive testing scheme, examinees are presented with different sets of items chosen from a pre-calibrated item pool. Thus the speed of attrition in items will be very fast, and replenishing of item pool is essential for CAT. The online calibration scheme in CAT refers to estimating the item parameters of new, un-calibrated items by presenting them to examinees during the course of their ability testing together with previously calibrated items. Therefore, the estimated latent trait levels of examinees are used as the design points for estimating the parameter of the new items, and naturally these designs, the estimated latent trait levels, are subject to some estimating errors. Thus the problem of the online calibration under CAT setup can be formulated as a sequential estimation problem with measurement errors in the independent variables, which are also chosen sequentially. Item Response Theory (IRT) is the most commonly used psychometric model in CAT, and the logistic type models are the most popular models used in IRT based tests. That's why the nonlinear design problem and the nonlinear measurement error models are involved. Sequential design procedures proposed here can provide more accurate estimates of parameters, and are more efficient in terms of sample size (number of examinees used in calibration). In traditional calibration process in paper-and-pencil tests, we usually have to pay for the examinees joining the pre-test calibration process. In online calibration, there will be less cost, since we are able to assign new items to the examinees during the operational test. Therefore, the proposed procedures will be cost-effective as well as time-effective.

本論文目的在分析臺灣學生學習成就評量資料庫(TASA)之新移民子女學習成就、心理、背景特質表現，及與本土子女進行比較。研究中自描述新移民族群的歷史演變、發展、可能遭遇困境與相關的研究中，進而，再搭配現行既有評量架構，以決定針對國小(四、六年級)新移民子女之數學成就、性別、家庭結構、家庭語言環境、家庭社經地位、家人、自我教育期望、親子關係、學校適應、學習策略、學習偏好、能力歸因、數學能力自我概念、內在動機、家庭作業、課業補習、課外活動等十多項心理、背景特質進行分析，而在詮釋其理論、實徵研究基礎後，運用測量不變性、多元潛在迴歸分析等技術以進行本研究各項議題之探討，希冀能就分析結果，提供未來研究之參考。 綜整分析後，可發現以下幾點結論： 一、在針對數學成就進行族群間之比較時，研究中在單向度假設與Rasch模式適配度檢定符合下，進而於排除顯著差異試題功能測量指標後，是運用多元潛在迴歸分析以進行本土與新移民子女數學成就之比較，分析結果顯示，在國小六年級內，並未存在顯著的族群差異，但是於國小四年級中，則是以本土子女的表現平均優於新移民子女，其差異效果為0.36，約屬Cohen(1992)認為介於中等至小的效果量，而接續於分析是否存在其它因素影響時，分析結果是顯示在先天消極的族群因素外，族群間家庭社經地位的不均衡才是真正影響之主因。 二、有關族群間之心理與背景特質比較方面，研究中在經採用測量不變性以確立工具品質，並伴隨著卡方獨立性考驗、獨立樣本t檢定之運用後，其分析結果大致顯示出新移民子女是較本土子女，在家中手足數僅有1位、位居老大或獨子女、繼親家庭與身處雙語環境等現況具有相對的多數，但是在學生認知家人、自我教育期望、親子關係、學校適應、學習策略運用、學習偏好以至課業補習、課外活動時間分派等，整體而言，則多是未具顯著的差異或屬Cohen(1992)所認為小的差異效果量範圍內。另一方面，研究中更突顯出的是族群間家庭社經地位的不平衡，確實占有極大的比重，是具備Cohen認為之中等至小的差異效果。 三、在分析心理、背景特質與數學成就關聯時，研究中在經採多元潛在迴歸分析後，其結果大致顯示：就族群與變項間之交互作用而言，國小四年級學生所認知之自我教育期望、內在動機等，相較於新移民子女，是對本土子女之數學成就有較高的影響力，但是國小六年級學生的家中手足數、家庭社經地位、記憶、控制策略運用與外控能力歸因的認知上，則是相對在新移民子女之數學成就上有較深厚的影響，而至於其它變項之分析，則多未存在族群的差異。進而，在排除族群的干擾，僅就各特質與數學成就關聯之主要效果而言，研究結果顯示除性別、家庭子女的出生序、家庭作業與課業補習分派時間等，存在不顯著或僅部份年級具備顯著效果外，其餘特質皆能符合本研究理論所預測之傾向，大致是以具備過多家中手足數或持過度的外控數學能力歸因者，是會對學生數學成就產生負面的影響，而其餘如來自完整家庭、身處主流語言環境、具備高家庭社經地位、教育期望、和諧親子關係、良好學校適應與擁有高度學習策略、偏好、動機等，則皆能正向的影響數學成就。 最後，研究中是就新移民子女定義、抽樣架構、測量指標等面向，提出對新移民子女學習成長資料庫之建立及與其它實務、研究之建議。 / The purpose of this study is to analyze neo-immigrant children’s achievement, performance in psychological traits and compare these with native children. Starting from the description of development, challenge and related researches of immigrant children in the past, we found the assessment frame of Taiwan Assessment of Student Achievement (TASA) just corresponded to the purpose we expect. Therefore, based on TASA , we decided to analyze the status and performance of neo-immigrant children in math, gender, family structure, language environment, socio-economic status, parents and self expectation, parents-children relationship, school adjustment, learning strategy, learning preference, ability attribution, academic self-concept, intrinsic motivation, time assignment of homework, school cramming, and extracurricular activity etc. Following the support of the theoretical and empirical evidences, we used the technique of measurement invariance and multiple latent regression to discover the different topics in the thesis. In sum, some conclusions are proposed. 1. In the comparison of math achievement between neo-immigrant and native children, we use the technique of multiple latent regression to test the difference after exclusion some items with significant differential item functioning. The result indicates that there is no significant difference between these two races in the sixth grade, but in the fourth grade the native children perform better than neo-immigrant children. The effect size is 0.36, and it is between medium and small degree according to Cohen(1992)’s opinion. Depended on this result, several following analyses are implemented. It shows the inequality of family socio-economic status between races is the main cause instead of the race people belong to. 2. In the comparison of psychological traits between neo-immigrant and native children, we not only use the technique of measurement invariance to ensure the qualities of assessment tools but also adopt chi-square test and independent samples t-test to examine the differences. The results indicate that the neo-immigrant children have more chances belonging to the categories of being eldest among siblings or only one child in his family, living in step-parents family, and involvement in bilingual environment. But there is almost no or just little difference between the two races in the perception of parent and self expectation, parents-children relationship, school adjustment, learning strategy application, learning preference, and the time assignment of school cramming and extracurricular activity. Besides, we found the inequality of family socio-economic status between races is the most different. The effect sizes range approximately from small to medium degree according to Cohen(1992)’s opinion. 3. In this study, we used the technique of multiple latent regression to analyze the relationship between different psychological traits and math achievement. The results indicate that as far as the interaction effects are concerned, the perception of self expectation and intrinsic motivation has greater impacts on native children’s math achievement than neo-immigrant’s in the fourth grade, but in the sixth grade the family size, family socio-economic status, the usage of memorization and control strategy, external ability attribution have greater impacts on neo-immigrant children’s math achievement than native children’s. Besides, there are no interaction effects on the remaining variables. Furthermore, as far as the main effect is concerned, the result shows that except no or just little relationship between gender, birth order, the time assignment of homework, school cramming and math achievement, the remaining variables have the similar relationships toward math achievement as we expect. That is that having too many siblings, external attribution of math ability may have negative influence on students’ achievement, but students who belong to intact family, involve in the mainstream of language environment, have higher family socio-economic status, and perceive better parent and self expectation, parents-children relationship, school adjustment etc. may have positive influence on their math achievement. Finally, some suggestions about the definition of neo-immigrant children, the way of sampling and qualities of measurement indicators are proposed. We expect they may do a greater help in the construct of the database of Prospect of Neo-Immigrant Children Learning and future usage.