本研究採用修正型德菲法研究方式，以財團法人工業技術研究院個案分析，及透過專家學者深度訪談及問卷調查結果，交叉驗證公設研究組織工研院，運用各類管理科學作為，企圖創造我國技術產業升級的價值優勢所在，同時在複雜的管理科學中，本研究更整理出一套系統，讓管理者優先找出組織的核心價值主軸，據此從價值導向的一連串的策略監控管理模式中，呈現所對應的組織智慧資本衡量指標所在。按此；運用系統化的內部組織結構重組，建構組織核心價值與相對應的智慧資本衡量指標，藉以監控管理模式，在組織中智慧資本相互作用下，讓組織的績效，得以透過價值提昇帶動突破的契機。本研究結果進一步在公務組織的行政績效考核政策上或可提供些許參考。 智慧資本分類上，主要區分為人力資本、結構資本及社會資本三種，而策略創新是為改造組織價值的動能所在；在本研究案工研院的組織特性使然，讓創新能量明顯帶動組織的價值並成為主軸，是以創新資本從結構資本中強勢獨立，相對的流程結構資本反成弱勢。另從本研究案建立的組織價值流量管控系統實證模型下，交差驗證深度訪談、問卷調查及個案分析的結果顯示：一、工研院的智慧資本透過長期形成價值優勢來展現，在組織特性運作下，知識技術的策略創新，帶動智慧資本衡量指標的價值強度走向。二、在系統運作路徑上，工研院首先掌握組織的核心價值主軸，透過價值鏈集中於計畫的達成，蘊涵豐盛的創新資本與人力資本，並建立良好的社會資本。三、工研院的各類管理科學，朝向計畫目標IP與產業效益的價值追求，並建立起一套內部智慧資本管控組織價值的運轉模式，其中存在著以創新帶動的動能含量。四、研究工研院建立起4大類共30組的智慧資本衡量指標，透過其各類管理科學運作模式下，篩選各衡量指標價值定義，可明確的帶動組織對產業的成效展現，若能應用來帶動策略創新的目標方向，應可營造更具體的技術產業價值。 知識是組織的核心本質，公務組織利用知識創新螺旋轉換模式，反饋遞迴來自各方的資訊，以營造更具社會價值成效的實績為目標，進行行政作業精簡革新，類此政策上的應用與創新，會是未來考核公務組織行政績效的最佳模式。 關鍵字：德菲法、智慧資本、衡量指標、價值流量管控系統、核心價值主軸 / This study uses the amendment-based Delphi method to approach to the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) case studies, and through depth interviews and survey results of experts and scholars, cross-validation of public research organization based the ITRI, the use of various types of management science as an attempt to create a the value of Taiwan's technology industries, the advantages of upgrading, while in the complex management science, the study also put together a system that allows managers to previously identify the organization's core values of the axis, whereby a series of value-oriented strategy for monitoring and management model, the present organization of the corresponding measure of intellectual capital is located. Here, using a systematic reorganization of the internal organizational structure, building the organization's core values and the corresponding measure of intellectual capital in order to monitor the management model of intellectual capital in the interaction of organization, so that the performance of the organization was able to drive the value enhancement breakthrough opportunities. The results of this study public policy of the organization's administrative performance appraisal can further provide a little information. Intellectual capital is divided into human capital, structural capital and social capital, while the strategy of innovation is the value of the kinetic energy for the transformation of the organization; in the case of this study, the institute's organizational characteristics dictates, so that creative energy is driving significant value to the organization and become spindle. Innovation capital is strong independent from the structural capital; however, the relative process structural capital becomes a weak process. Another case from this study to establish the organization of the value of an empirical model traffic management and control system, the cross validation-depth interviews, questionnaires and case analysis showed as followings: First, the institute's intellectual capital through the formation of the value of long-term advantage to present, in the operation of organizational characteristics under the strategy of knowledge and technology innovation, promote the value of intellectual capital measurement indicators into intensity. Second, the operation in the system path, the ITRI acquired the organization's core values of axis, through the value chain and the program to reach. A rich implication of innovation capital and human capital established a good social capital. Third, all kinds of management science of the ITRI toward the pursuit of value of IP and industrial benefits plans, and establish the operation mode of organizational values under internal intellectual capital controls, in which there is innovation-driven kinetic energy content. Fourth, to research ITRI setting up a total of 30 group of four broad categories of intellectual capital measurement indicators, through its mode of operation of various types of management science, the selection of indicators to measure the value of the various indicators, is clearly driven by the organization to show the effectiveness of the industries. If these indicators can be applied to boost the strategic direction of the objectives of innovation, the ITRI should be able to create a more specific technical industrial value. Knowledge is the organization's core essence of innovation. Public service organizations use the knowledge conversion spiral model of recursive feedback of information from all sides so as to create a more effective performance of the social value of the objective of streamlining administrative operations innovation, this kind of policy application and innovation and public service organizations, will be assessing the future performance of the best mode of administration. Keywords: Delphi method, intellectual capital, measurement indicators, the value of traffic management and control system, the core values of axis

行動通信市場開放初期，市場供需活絡，電信營收快速增長，然而經過十年的成長期後，行動通信市場已趨近飽和。台灣行動電話滲透率近五年之滲透率由2006年之95.7%逐步增至2010年111.73%，市場滲透率已呈現過度飽和的情形。手機費率組合的多元化讓消費者忠誠度易受動搖，電信業者除了需吸引新用戶外，還須鞏固既有用戶以避免流失，所面臨的挑戰與競爭，較以往更為劇烈。 本論文著眼於分析直營門市人力資源的缺口，以及門市人員的績效制度的設計合理性。並以Kaplan and Norton (1996)所發展之平衡計分卡架構，協助澄清組織願景、策略，並作為診斷人力缺口之功能，以及績效評核的合理性。經由人員素質提升，透過差異化的服務品質來加強消費者對電信業者品牌的認知差異，以提升企業本身的競爭力。 本研究主要以單一電信業者做為個案分析。研究發現人員主要缺口在選訓用留制度的建立上，透過職能分析來補足策略性衡量指標缺口，釐清績效目標設定問題，同時檢視門市潛在的問題，在招募、訓練、績效評估、薪酬制度上產出新的建議，同時也在目前的績效評核系統，透過平衡計分卡的觀點提出新的改革衡量指標。

生技產業為典型知識產業，同時也因醫藥研發的突破，而使國人受惠享受健康的生活，惟因與人類健康相關，涉及複雜的知識領域、道德倫理、法規管理、產業合作及商業化等過程。近年來國內新設生技公司莫不以開發新藥為職志，且都有其獨特經營哲學與營運模式來達成其企業終極目標。 本研究以國內開發新藥的生技公司為研究對象，採個案研究方法透過分析個案公司之過去策略發展，實地訪問經營團隊以描述策略形態及勢態，發展策略地圖及平衡計分卡四大構面具體內容並進而以相關係數驗證各策略衡量指標與策略目標間之關聯性，最後試圖連結PwC企業價值報告中價值平台，據以建構個案公司內部策略態勢與策略管理報導。 本研究之主要研究結論包括： 一、 個案公司已有明確的企業願景，亦已積極分析未來的策略形態，除定期性財務資訊外，應系統化建置一策略管理報導，使組織資源聚焦，形成共識，改善組織策略執行力。 二、 經由驗證相關分析，現階段策略形態的部分衡量指標間呈現顯著正相關，亦有大多數衡量指標因產品商品化時間過長尚無明確關聯，故個案公司應持續追縱現行策略衡量指標因果關聯狀況。 三、 個案公司可運用內部策略管理報導具體呈現策略活動執行結果，建立評估策略目標達成程度之價值管理報表，成為內部策略檢討會議之共同基礎，利用策略思考、澄清與共識之達成。而長期系統化之分析比較，除可提供更具攸關內部價值報告及管理資訊外，亦可作為外部報導企業價值資訊的基礎。 / Pharmaceutical industry is a typical knowledge industry. At the meantime, people can enjoy healthy life because of the breakthrough of medicine research and development. However, this industry is closely connecting to human health, thus there are various and complex domains involved, including knowledge, ethics, laws and regulations, collaboration of industry and commercialization, and etc. In recent years, local newly established pharmaceutical companies set their goals in developing new drugs, and have their own unique operating philosophy and operating models in order to reach their ultimate corporate goals. The object of this study is a local new drug developing pharmaceutical company. Through the analysis of strategic development of the past based on the methodology of case study and describing strategic posture and strength via interview with the managing team, the strategic plan and contents of four scopes for balanced scorecard are developed. Further, the relationship between strategic measurement indicators and strategic objectives are verified through correlated coefficients. And lastly, linking to the value platform of PwC Corporate Value Reporting in order to construct internal strategic move and strategic managerial reporting of the case company. The conclusions of this study including: 1. Case company has clear business vision, and is actively analyzing future strategic form. In addition to periodic financial information, the case company should construct a strategic managerial reporting in order to focus organizational resources, draw consensus, and improve organizational strategic executive. 2. Based on the correlation coefficient analysis, there is positive correlation among partial measurement indicators of current strategic posture. However, there is no clear correlation for most of the measurement indicators due to long span for product commercialization. The case company should continuously follow up the correlation for current strategic measurement indicators. 3. The case company can apply its internal strategic managerial reporting to specifically present the results of its operations, and establish value managing statements for assessing the achieving of strategic targets, to formulate the common basis for internal strategic review meeting, and utilize strategic thinking, clarification and reaching of consensus. In addition, long-term systematic analysis and comparison can be used not only for more relevant internal value reporting and managerial information, and be the basis for external corporate value reporting.

本文以實地實證研究方法，探討「非財務性績效衡量指標」與「工作設計」此二項誘因工具對員工績效的影響。實地研究對象為一家商業銀行，研究期間為1993-1997；該行於1995年7月開始採用非財務性績效衡量指標，並自1996年1月選擇五家分行實施徵、授信分工。 本文首先利用個案銀行17位授信員連續60個月所構成的縱查資料（panel data），以固定影響模型（fixed-effects model）分析非財務性績效衡量指標誘因工具對員工績效的影響，發現銀行授信人員之績效考核制度中，加入授信不良率與脫落率非財務性衡量指標後，雖然授信員努力的重分配導致其授信金額與利息收入財務績效變差，但授信員的授信不良率與脫落率非財務績效變佳，整體而言，授信利潤有顯著的改善。 本文另以實施徵、授信分工前後，51名授信員的績效資料，採中斷的時間序列設計（interrupted time-series design），檢定非財務性績效衡量指標與工作設計配合採用後，員工的績效是否較佳。分析結果顯示，存在非財務績效衡量指標之獎酬制度下，配合實施徵、授信分工的授信員，其授信金額及授信不良率績效顯著較徵、授信合一之授信員為佳。 / This thesis reports the results of a longitudinal field study examining the impact of nonfinancial performance measures and job design on employee performance. A commercial bank was the research site. The bank adopted nonfinancial performance measures in July 1995 and redesigned jobs in retail banking credit underwriting at five branches in January 1996. Prior to the job redesign, sales representatives were jointly responsible for all credit underwriting functions including credit extension and credit servicing. After the change, sales representatives were only responsible for credit extension while credit servicing was handled by credit decidion-makers. Panel data for 17 sales representatives over 60 months (1993 through 1997) were obtained to assess the effects of adopting nonfinancial measures on employee performance. Using fixed-effects regression analysis, the results are consistent with the predictions of agency theory: although loan volume and interest revenue decreased following adoption of nonfinancial measures to evaluate and compensate the performance of sales representatives, loan profit increased significantly. This thesis also hypothesizes that employee performance increases with the fit between incentive systems based on nonfinancial measures and job design. The empirical tests of this prediction rely on an interrupted time-series design, using performance data of 51 sales representatives in the 1995-1997 period. After the change in job design-separation of the credit underwriting jobs-alogn with introduction of incentive systems based on nonfinancial measures, the treatment group demonstrated greater improvements in productivity and quality performance. This result supports the hypothesis developed.

本研究主要探討裁量性紅利對企業未來財務績效之激勵效果，而本研究係以2010年美國S&P500公司作為研究對象，研究期間為2006年至2010年。實證結果顯示：(1)依據主觀績效衡量所發放的裁量性紅利確實可以對企業未來財務績效產生激勵效果；(2)獎酬契約運用主觀與客觀績效衡量時，主觀績效衡量所發放的裁量性紅利佔總紅利比重愈高，對於企業未來財務績效激勵效果愈高；(3)裁量性紅利對於企業未來後續財務績效具有長期激勵效果；(4)績效較低之企業發予高階經理人主觀績效衡量之裁量性紅利，對於企業未來財務績效仍具有激勵效果。 / The study investigate the impact of discretionary bonus on the future firm financial performance. Based on a sample of 2010 S&P500 companies spanning from 2006 and 2010. I find : (1) Discretionary bonus, which was measured subjectively, can improve future firm financial performance. (2) The more proportion of discretionary bonus to total bonus can improve more future firm financial performance. (3) Discretionary bonus can improve the long-term future firm financial performance. (4) Using subjectively discretionary bonus to CEOs on low-profit-company can improve the future firm financial performance.

就一個併購案而言，資訊科技的整合是最重要且複雜的任務之一。過去許多併購的研究著重於技術和組織的議題而忽略了如何去衡量資訊系統整合成功與否，然而現今的研究依舊鮮少著墨於併購後資訊系統整合的績效評估。不同的利害關係人對於併購後資訊系統的成功有所不同，衡量的標準從流程的強化到顧客的滿意度也有所差異。因此，本論文將利害關係人區分為執行長、資訊長、業務經理和顧客四種角色來探討。本研究的目標是欲從策略面和經營面檢驗資訊系統整合的成敗並以一個較廣的衡量方式追蹤資訊系統整合的成效。本研究使用兩階段的實證研究，第一階段以目前相關的文獻和研究發展出初步的衡量指標和研究發現;第二階段藉著訪談多名業界人士進行多個案分析，檢驗第一階段所提出的指標，接著發展出一完整且具備多利害關係人衡量指標的表格，此表格可清楚表現此四利害關係人衡量指標的優先順序。本研究發現，對執行長來說，達到企業綜效和提升市佔率是他的前二衡量指標;對資訊長來說，維持營運的持續性和統整所有資訊科技是他的前二衡量指標;對業務經理來說，維持營運的持續性和整合後資訊系統的彈性是他的前二衡量指標;對於顧客而言，則是營運的持續性和顧客自身資料的正確性。本研究亦發現於設計和規劃資訊系統的整合時，必須特別考量資訊系統的彈性和使用者介面，以提高整體資訊系統整合所帶來的效益。同時，對於企業來說，此時亦是個好契機做企業流程的再造和強化企業自身的競爭力，可以更積極的方式來實現資訊系統整合帶來的價值。希望本研究所提出的衡量指標能提供企業有效且一致的基準去評估併購後資訊系統整合成功與否。 / IT integration is one of the most critical and complex tasks in a merger-and-acquisition (M&A) project. Many studies on M&A have focused on the technological and organizational issues of information technologies (IT) integration but have left out the important base of what to measure for in the success of the integration. Existing research remains sparse in explaining the performance assessment of a post-merger IT integration. The success of post-merger IT integration can be viewed differently by different stakeholders—the CEOs, the CIOs, the business managers, and the customers of the merged companies—and thus standards used vary from process enhancement to customer satisfaction. The objective of this research is to examine the success of post-merger IT integration from both strategic and operational viewpoints and track the integration performance using a wide range of business measures. This study uses a two-phase empirical study. The first phase involves building preliminary indicators and findings by the related literatures and research. In the second phase, we use a multi-case method by interviewing the practitioners to develop a detailed table of stakeholders’ measurements. Finally, the table reveals that the top two measurements for CEOs are achieving synergies and increasing market share; for the CIOs, the top measurements are operational continuity and technology consolidation, for business managers the measurements are operational continuity and the flexibility of an integrated system, while for the customer the measurements are operational continuity and the accuracy of customer information. Moreover, this study also finds the importance of taking flexibility and user interface into consideration while planning and designing IT integration. For an enterprise, IT integration is also a good opportunity to reengineer business processes to enhance competitiveness. It is hoped that the resultant measurements can provide a consistent and useful benchmark for evaluating IT integration success after a business investment in an M&A project.

平衡計分卡( Balanced Scorecard, BSC)是一項可以協助描述、並推動組織策略付諸實行的利器，關於描述組織之價值創造的四個構面模式，可以當成高階管理團隊彼此間討論企業發展方向與策略議題優先性的共同語言。至於有關策略性衡量指標，除了是四大構面的績效指標之外，也應被視為BSC內四個構面具有因果關係連結的目標、項目；Robert S. Kaplan和David P. Norton共同創造出一個關於此連結的通用表達方式，用來協助高階主管進行討論，並稱之為策略地圖。他們同時也證明了BSC所寄託的一個基本原則，那就是「如果您能夠衡量，就可以管理」 從實務經驗中大多數人都會認為管理資訊系統不僅協助企業管理工作，也是產出各種衡量數據的利器，因此本研」究希望透過分析已導入過BSC之個案公司，探討該公司由策略地圖所引導出來的各項策略性衡量指標的資訊需求，是否能夠在其管理資訊系統中獲得滿足？管理資訊系統的建置是否應該優先支援公司策略性目標？實際上探訪各行業導入BSC之狀況，發現普遍存在著「數據落差」。 本研究旨在建構一套能夠彌補「數據落差的資訊需求規劃模式，利用商業智慧(BI)工具擷取ERP、CRM、SCM、Workflow、KM、e-Learning等管理資訊系統之有效數據，進行資訊加工後，提供給BSC資訊系統，在數位儀表板上顯示，以協助隨時管控策略性衡量指標之達成狀況。本研究也將BSC導入程序及資訊系統整合作業加以制式化，整理成BSC導入專案進度表，供其它有意導入BSC之企業參考，本論文最後延伸說明BSC在協助組織變革管理、協助智慧資本之衡量、及審視資訊資本齊備程度等方面，都很有助益。 / Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is a powerful tool for describing and implementing an organization’s strategy. The four-perspective model of describing a value-creating organization can be regards as a language for executive teams to discuss the direction and priority of their strategic agenda. In terms of strategy measures, they do not only represent as the key performance indicators (KPIs) of four independent perspectives, but also regard as the cause-effect linkage of goals and items among the four perspectives of BSC. Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton created the expression model of the cause-effect linkage to assist the discussion process of executive teams. It is so called a strategy map. They both also demonstrated a fundamental principle underling the BSC; i.e. “If you can measure, you can manage it.” From an empirical perspective, people believe that management information systems (MISs) can help the efficiency and effectiveness of business administration as well as be the powerful tool of generating data for various performance measures. Therefore, by analyzing a case of a BSC roll-out enterprise, this research would like to address whether the data requirements of strategic measures generating from strategy maps are fulfilled by the data output from the MISs or not. Is it a necessity to support the strategic goals of an enterprise first in case of building MISs for an enterprise? After studying the status of roll-out BSC enterprises in different industries, it shows that there is a “KPI-data accuracy” issue between actual KPIs needed and the data resources from. The purpose of this research is to build a data requirement planning model to find out the “accurate data” by using a business intelligence (BI) tool to access the effective information from ERP, CRM, SCM, Workflow, KM, e-Learning; etc., and then to manipulate those data in order to output the BSC indicators for executive teams for monitoring the status achieved of BSC from the dashboard anytime. Moreover, the study also standardizes the BSC roll-out processes and the integration processes of MISs by summarizing into time tables of project management which can be regarded as a reference kit for enterprises intending to implement BSC in the future. Finally, the study also demonstrates the benefits of BSC in assisting change management of an organization, in evaluating the intellectual capital, and in measuring information capital readiness of an enterprise, etc.

IC產品的產品生命週期極為短暫且市場上競爭十分地激烈，因此「創新」巳是IC設計公司求生存及求發展的不二法門。而如何有效地管理及衡量公司的創新活動以達成企業的目標，巳是以創新為首要發展要務的IC設計公司，首須面對及解決的問題。 公司在開發新產品或是新技術的過程中，往往須將許多無形資產，進行運用以及整合，而IC設計公司具有「無形資產極大化」之特色，因此在對IC設計公司進行創新活動之管理或衡量時，若能將所有無形資產納入考慮，則必可提昇創新管理或衡量之效率。 故在本研究，擬以創新管理與智慧資本理論結合之應用，建構IC設計公司在創新活動下之智慧資本衡量系統，以幫助IC設計創新活動之管理。因此，本研究擬就下述二問題，進行探討： 1、創新各階段活動（投入-流程-產出-效益）各項智慧資本為何？亦即討論各項智慧資本，何者係屬於創新投入階段所需之資源；何者係屬於創新流程階段所需之公司支援；創新產出階段之生成物對公司各項智慧資本之影響；最後在創新效益階段，則係探討創新生成物於市場上表現及所生價值，對公司各項智慧資本之影響； 2、分析創新各階段活動（投入-流程-產出-效益）中，重要之智慧資本衡量指標，以此建立創新活動下之智慧資本衡量系統，幫助公司創新活動之管理。 本研究，經對2家IC設計領導廠商深入訪談，以及15家IC設計公司，共計30名業者調查，以結合應用創新管理與智慧資本之理論。研究之結果認為： 1、IC設計公司，在創新投入階段所須投入之資源，主要是人力資本、創新資本，其次為顧客資本、關係資本，最後是組織文化資本及IT資本；創新過程中，所需之公司支援，主要是組織文化資本及人力資本，其次為IT資本、流程資本及創新資本；創新之產出，主要係對公司創新資本及流程資本產生影響；創新收益階段對公司顧客資本產生影響，其次係創新資本，最後是人力資本； 2、IC設計公司，於創新投入階段，重要投入資源之智慧資本衡量指標為：人力資本衡量指標中之員工盡責的程度、員工工作動機的強烈程度、員工專業技能的良窳、員工工作勝任程度、公司擁有吸引具潛力員工的能力；創新資本衡量指標中之產品設計與開發平均時間、公司掌握新機會的能力、公司回應市場的能力、新產品研發能力因素；組織文化資本衡量指標中之組織擁有創新文化、經營團隊的領導力因素；顧客資本衡量指標中之對客戶需求的了解程度、市場成長性、對目標市場的瞭解因素；以及關係資本衡量指標中之擁有許多堅強的策略夥伴、與策略夥伴的關係、與上中下游體系的關係因素；其中最重要者係，公司擁有吸引具潛力員工的能力、對客戶需求的了解程度、員工專業技能的良窳、公司掌握新機會的能力、擁有許多堅強的策略夥伴、與策略夥伴的關係、與上中下游體系的關係。 創新流程階段，會影響公司創新進行之智慧資本衡量指標為：人力資本中之員工盡責的程度、員工工作動機的強烈程度、每年核心員工平均流動率、員工專業技能的良窳、員工工作勝任程度；創新資本中之公司智慧財產管理制度；組織文化資本中之組織擁有學習文化、組織員工擁有互相支援的氣氛、組織擁有創新文化、組織成員團隊合作的程度、經營團隊的領導力因素；流程資本中之策略執行程度因素；IT資本中之公司資訊系統存取的容易度、員工透過科技緊密連結組織內部的工作流程因素；其中最重要者為，員工透過科技緊密連結組織內部的工作流程、組織員工擁有互相支援的氣氛、組織成員團隊合作的程度。 在創新產出階段，而主要衡量之智慧資本衡量指標為創新資本中之產品設計與開發平均時間、智慧財產數量、智慧財產品質造成影響；其中最重要者為智慧財產品質。 在創新效益階段，主要衡量之智慧資本衡量指標為創新資本中之研發領導地位，以及顧客資本中之客戶滿意度、客戶忠誠度、市場佔有率；其中最重要者市場佔有率。 / Facing the short life cycle of IC products and competitive market, “innovation” has been the only way for IC design house to survive and develop. But how to manage and measure innovation activities to reach the goal of corporate are really the problem need to be faced and solved for IC design house which reviews innovation as the most important thing. In the process of developing new products and new technologies, companies usually need to use and integrate many resources and intangible assets. IC design house has the features of “maximizing intangible assets”. If IC design house can take all the intangible assets into account when managing and measuring innovation activities, then the efficiency of innovation management and measurement will be enhanced. In this research, I construct “the measurement system of intellectual capital under innovation activities” of IC design house by combining the theories of innovation management with intelletcual capital to manage the innovation activities of IC design. Therefore, this research will discuss the following issues: 1. Which kind of intellectual capital is attributed in each innovation stage (input-process-output-outcome) ? In another word, this study explores what kind of intellectual capital is the necessary resource in the input stage of innovation ? What kind of intellectual capital is the necessary support in the process stage of innovation ? What kind of intellectual capital is influenced in the output stage of innvaiton? What kind of intellectual capital is influenced in the outcome stage of innovation when the innovation output performing and creating value in the market? 2. Based on the findings of important intellectual capital indicators in each innovation activities (input-process-output-outcome), I build the “the measurement system of intellectual capital under innovation activities” to manage the innovation activities of company. Through interviewing 2 leading IC design companies and surveying 15 IC design companies (30 investigators), and combining the theories of innovation management with intellectual capital, my conclusions are as follows : 1. For IC design house, the primary resources in the input stage of innovation are human capital and innovation capital. The secondary resources are customer capital and relationship capital ; organization culture capital and IT capital are the last. In the process stage of innovation, the primary supports are organization culture capital and human capital, then another supports include IT capital, process capital and innovation capital. The innovation outputs influence innovation capital and process capital. The innovation outcomes have the main impacts on customer capital, then on innovation capital, and on human capital at last. 2. For IC design house, the important intellectual capital indicators of resources in the stage of input are as follows : the employee’s responsibility, the employee’s motivation, the employee’s skill, the employee’s qualification and the company’s abilities to attract potential employees for human capital. In addition, another important indicators include time of product development and design, ability of catching new opportunities, ability of reponsing the market, ability of new product design for innovation capital, and innovation culture, leadership for organization culture capital. Knowing the need of customers, market growth and knowing the target market are important for customer capital. Having many alliances, relationship with alliances and relationship with value chain should be noticed for relationship capital. All in all, the company’s abilities to attract potential employees, knowing the need of customers, the employee’s skill, ability of catching new opportunities, having many alliances, relationship with alliances, and relationship with value chain are more important indicators than others. In the stage of process, the important intellectual capital indicators that will have impacts on the ongoing innovation activities are as follows : the employee’s responsibility, the employee’s motivation, turnover of keyperson per year, the employee’s skill, the employee’s qualification for human capital. Mechanism of intellectual property management is important for innovation capital. Learning culture, supportive atmosphere, innovation culture, teamwork, leadership should be considered for organization culture capital. Execution of strategy is necessary for process capital. Convenience of getting/saving information and connecting through IT infrastructure are important for IT capital. In the stage of output, the primary intellectual capital indicators are time of product development and design, quantity of intellectual property and quality of intellectual property. In summary, the quality of intellectual property is the most important. In the stage of outcome, the main intellectual capital indicators are R&D leading position for innovation capital, customer satisfication, customer royalty, and market share for customer capital. All in all, market share is the most important indicator.

平衡計分卡（Balanced Scorecard,BSC）被認為是可以解決企業策略執行力不足的最佳良方，藉由與公司策略連結的策略性衡量指標，驅動企業策略之執行。而作業價值管理（Activity Value Management,AVM）為吳安妮教授經過長年對作業基礎成本制度（Activity-Based Costing,ABC）的持續研究及實務運用，進而提出的系統制度，隨著企業營運即時輸出各種回饋資訊及管理報表，確實輔助各管理階層做出營運上的各種決策。平衡計分卡與作業基礎成本制度之結合與應用，在國內外皆有相關研究，而作業價值管理此一嶄新的系統制度尚未有研究探討其與平衡計分卡之結合內容。 本研究係針對國內中小企業中一食品機械製造公司進行個案研究，伴隨個案公司的步伐導入平衡計分卡及作業價值管理，並進一步探討兩者結合後所擬定的策略性衡量指標，如何使得績效管理更有助於個案公司策略之執行，並期盼研究結果可以作為未來中小企業結合兩制度之參考。 / Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is considered the best solution to solve the lack of operating capability within enterprises. By connecting corporate strategy with strategic KPIs, BSC stimulates the operation of strategies. After years of study and practice of Activity-Based Costing (ABC), Prof. Anne Wu has developed the system of Activity Value Management (AVM). With the prompt feedback and management reports generated from corporate operation, AVM assists all kinds of decision making by lower through upper management echelons. Despite that there are domestic and international studies of combination and application of BSC and ABC, there are yet studies combine BSC with the advanced AVM system. This research is based on a case study of a medium-sized domestic food machinery manufacturing enterprise, through tracking the process of which importing both AVM and BSC; meanwhile studying the development of strategic KPIs, and how it benefits performance management which supports the operation of enterprise strategy; longing for that henceforth, the result of this study to be used as reference for small and medium-sized enterprises which combine the two systems.

KPI(Key Performance Index)是一個落後指標，需要一套更及時的領先指標，以動態和系統化的角度，及時展現每一位員工的執行績效和顧客滿意度指標，以數位化看板的概念報導員工對公司的貢獻度和顧客對服務的接受度，因為預先管控和報導，可以確保KPI 的達成，在服務品質的改善和顧客滿意度提升，有很大的助益。. 本研究希望發展出一套具體的線上及時管控指標，讓系統整合公司可以提升顧客信賴和持續服務品質改善，而將重點發展方向轉移到提供更好的內容、產品、服務、系統的品質，以及合理的價格。 因此採用平衡計分卡的四大構面為面向，ITIL服務生命週期之IT服務管理為主軸，參考PZB三位教授之服務品質概念性模式和SERVQUAL量表衡量構面及項目，配合系統整合公司的運作，歸納出一個服務品質改善架構流程圖，並以其為基礎發展一套服務品質改善的及時管控指標；運用商業智慧、數位儀表版等工具設計以支援主管決策管控和員工績效的報導系統。