本篇論文應用Rubin (1973)、Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983、1985a,b)所發展的配對方法(Matching Method)探討兩個議題，其一是評估企業從事社會責任行為是否可以改善績效，另一則是探討銀行加入金控後對其績效的影響。 / 針對第一個議題，我們將FTSE All-share 指數中被收錄於英國FTSE 社會責任指數的成份股定義為社會責任企業，未被收錄者定義為非社會責任企業，應用配對方法，根據特性變數是否相近為依據進行樣本配對。實證結果發現，不論使用配對前或是配對後的樣本進行分析，皆找不到社會責任企業的平均績效優於非社會責任企業的證據；相反地，部分的證據顯示社會責任企業的財務績效相對較低，因此我們的分析結果傾向支持焦點移轉假說，社會責任行為對財務績效的影響效果為負。 / 另外，我們以遠見雜誌於2006 年公佈的企業社會責任調查為基礎，將衡量企業社會責任績效的三個層面－社區參與、環境保護與財務透明，透過投資組合分析與迴歸分析來評估公司承擔社會責任與財務績效之間的關聯性。實證結果發現，第一，平均來說，公司的社會責任評分愈高，在評比結果公佈後的股票報酬愈低，兩者之間呈現負向關係；第二，公司在不同層面的社會責任行為對於股價報酬的影響具有差異性；第三、透過公司的長期財務資料發現，社會責任評分高的公司其長期平均會計績效相對較佳，但長期平均的股票報酬相對較低，表示社會責任型公司不一定是一個好的投資標的；最後，我們找不到支持社會責任行為可以做為公司績效保險的證據。本文使用各別層面的評比指標，更廣泛地評估社會責任行為對財務績效的影響，改進既有文獻中僅使用單一指標的不足之處。 / 就第二個議題而言，同樣地應用配對方法，根據銀行的特性變數是否相近為依據進行樣本篩選，利用台灣上市上櫃的銀行在2002 年第1 季至2006 年第2季的資料，我們發現在樣本配對前，平均來說，金控銀行在15 個CAMEL 績效指標的表現上皆相對較佳；樣本配對後，金控銀行除了在費用比率之外，其他的評比指標仍相對優於獨立銀行；不論使用配對前或配對後的樣本做分析，皆未出現金控銀行績效顯著較差的證據，因此，我們的實證結果偏向支持綜效假設，銀行加入金控對績效的影響效果為正向。 / 我們的研究架構與方案評估與政策衝擊分析文獻中的方法相一致，而貢獻則在於我們考慮樣本之間特性變數的差異性，進而以樣本配對的方式修正這個差異性，將有效降低既有文獻中在檢驗上述兩個議題上的選擇偏誤問題。 / In this thesis, we apply several matching methods, develop by Rubin (1973)、Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983, 1985a,b), on examing the effects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on firm financial performance (CSR-effect) and on evaluating the effects of banks being subordinated to FHC on CAMEL indicators (join-FHC effect). / For the former application, two competing hypotheses, social impact hypothesis and shift of focus hypothesis, are proposed, where the former suggests that CSR has a positive relation with performance and the latter are opposite. To ensure the CSR-effect is not contaminated by other factors or the sample is randomly drawn, we employ four matching methods, Nearest, Caliper, Mahala and Mahala Caliper to match the characteristics of the firms with CSR (CSR-firms) and without CSR (NonCSR-firms) to get rid of sample selection bias. Although the four methods yield slightly different results, to our surprised, firms engaging in CSR activities obtain lower values on the return on assets, return on equity, return on sales and earnings per share. Therefore, CSR at the very least does not improve the firm performance, supporting the shift of focus hypothesis. Engaging in CSR activities lead to more pain than gain, at least in the short run. / On the CSR topic, using a set of disaggregated social performance indicators for community participation, environmental protection and fiancail transparency from the Global Views Monthly, we examine the relationship between CSR and financial performance of TSE listing companies. Our main results show that first, scores on composite social performance indicators are negatively related to stock returns and this relationship cannot be rationalized by multi-factor models for explaining the cross-sectional variation in stock returns. Second, the effects of three disaggregated social performance indicators on stock returns are differenct among industries. Third, aggregated social performance indicator is positively related to long-term accounting performance but negatively related to long-term market performance, and thus implies that good companies are good in books, but not good investments. Finally, firms with high CSR ratings do no exhibit smaller decline of their financial performance during stagnations and thus not support the view that CSR is insurance of financial performance. / The second application, two hypotheses, synergy hypothesis and specialization advantage hypothesis, are raised too, where the former suggests that FHC-banks performer better and the latter are contrary. Above four matching methods are still used to fix the characteristics of two groups of banks in order to correct for sample selection bias. Based on after-matching samples, most of our empirical results suggest that FHC-banks, on average, outperform independent banks on most of indicators on capital adequacy, asset quality, earning ability and liquidity but not on management ability and being FHC-banks at the very least does not deteriorate the performance of banks, making our conclusion favors the synergy hypothesis and against specialization advantage hypothesis in Taiwan. / Our framework is identical to many applications of matching method such as Persson (2001), Hutchison (2004), Glick, Guo and Hutchison (2006), and are also parallel to standard medical and biological research.

To date there is little evidence on the effect of property-liability (P-L) insurer's business strategy and organizational structure change on their frontier efficiency performance and productivity change. This issue is important since traditional theory assumes firms that minimizes cost and maximizes profit with more efficient strategy will survive in the long run. The main goal of this dissertation is to examine the efficiency performance in the U.S. P-L insurance industry using frontier efficiency and productivity methods. This dissertation consists of three essays on the efficiency studies. The first essay uses the data envelopment analysis to examine the efficiency performance and economies of scope for nonspecialists and specialists in the U.S. P-L insurance industry. The empirical evidence suggests that nonspecialists (specialists) dominate specialists (nonspecialists) in producing nonspecialists (specialists) input–output vectors and provide evidence for the coexistence of economies of scope and diseconomies of scope in the U.S. P-L insurance industry. Our second essay uses the stochastic frontier analysis to examine whether nonspecialized strategy dominates specialized strategy in the U.S. P-L insurance industry. The empirical evidence supports that both the nonspecialized hypothesis and the specialized hypothesis hold for different types of P-L insurers. Our third essay investigates whether the conversion of U.S. P-L insurers improves their efficiency performance before and after conversion. The empirical evidences of the value-added approach and the financial intermediary approach indicate that converting insurers experience improvement in their efficiency relative to mutual counter samples after the conversion, supporting the efficiency hypothesis proposed by Mayers and Smith (1986). Overall, the evidence of this dissertation shows that P-L insurer's diversification strategy and organizational structure change has significant impact on their frontier efficiency performance and productivity change.

台灣科技業代工廠常面臨購買合法來源零組件，仍無法擺脫專利侵權控訴之命運，亦或常居於談判地位劣勢之被授權方角色，只能接受授權方完全排除自身擔保責任之契約條款，導致國內廠商始終擺脫不了高額權利金及侵權損害賠償金之累。本論文之核心研究問題，即在於探討如何在專利授權之架構下，降低未來潛在之第三人侵權責任風險？並區分法律制度層面、契約設計層面、管理制度層面，三個面向進行探討，嘗試提出可行之風險管控策略。個案研究方面，選擇美國最高法院Quanta v. LG專利侵權訴訟案，此案受各界宣稱為近期美國司法界對於專利制度最具指標性之判決，本論文透過判決評析探求美國法院見解真意，並在此架構下，提出個人意見及看法，進而對於專利權人未來之策略轉變，以及台灣代工業者應之因應方式提出建議。 1、法律制度面管控： 被控侵權者可運用專利制度下賦予專利權本質上限制之「專利權耗盡原則」，衡平原則發展下之「默示授權原則」，以及「再授權理論」對於專利權人之權利主張限制，以達降低侵權責任成立之風險。美國法下針對專利權耗盡原則及默示授權原則發展出多種態樣，惟其是否於個案中有所適用空間，往往仍取決於授權契約條款之解釋，此即彰顯出事先明確定義授權條款之重要性。 2、契約設計面管控： 由於我國法與美國法下對於專利授權契約定性上之差異，進而推衍出我國法下相較於美國法較加重授權人責任之結果，是以我國學說有主張當被授權人因運用授權標的遭受第三人主張侵權時，應準用民法瑕疵擔保規定使授權人承負一定責任者；反之，美國學說則普遍否認授權人存在有此等法定契約責任，此亦和雙方政策選擇保護立場互異之結果不謀而合。惟在現階段實務及學說對於授權人是否承擔被授權人之侵權瑕疵擔保責任尚無定見之下，以契約條款預先分配侵權風險最可達成管控風險之目的。美國企業之授權契約發展已十分成熟，與侵權責任分配相關之典型條款，如：授權條款、聲明擔保條款、補償條款，均存有許多附隨之細節需於契約設計談判時預先留意。惟若於契約條款中無法獲得有利於己之責任分配模式，即應評估風險性高低，決定是否採行其他之風險管控方式，如：專利侵權責任保險、企業自行提撥風險準備金、進行專利侵權訴訟評估與管理等。 3、管理制度面管控： 授權做為專利眾多換價模式之一，其背後最終之目的即在於具體落實為企業利潤收益，自然無法背離商業策略思維而獨立運作。國內現階段之專利授權實務發展成效不彰，其原因即在於國內普遍認為授權是單純法律之範疇，而未於企業內建立一套完備之授權管理制度。事實上，授權契約設計亦應與智財行銷要素、商業模式建構要素，以及企業營運流程相互配套，藉由平時有效之管理制度，方能確實將侵權風險防患於未然。 4、個案判決評析結論： 國內代工業者Quanta雖於本案中獲得最終勝訴判決，可說是貫徹了美國最高法院近年來持續傾向限縮專利權人權能之見解。然其是否代表台灣代工業者獲得了完全的勝利？往後不需再為合法採購之零件是否侵權一事苦惱？本論文採取保留之態度。因本案判決事實上僅圍繞在判斷LG與Intel授權範圍之解釋，並未對於能否以契約條款限制專利權耗盡原則表示見解。且本案判決出爐後，專利權人未來勢必轉變其授權策略，亦可預見其授權條款將更趨嚴苛，以規避判決中劃定之界限。台灣代工廠商實應謹慎集思因應策略以對。 / Taiwan OEMs are often situated in the role as licensees with inferior bargaining power when negotiated license agreements with foreign companies, and usually had no choice but to accept unfair contract terms. Therefore, Taiwan companies cannot get ride of high royalties and infringement penalty for all these years. This paper aims to discuss how to reduce potential patent infringement risk under the license system. The discussion will be elaborated from three aspects: Legal, Contract, and Management, and it will also try to propose some feasible risk management strategies. Furthermore, the paper will include a case study on Quanta v. LG, which is believed to be the most significant patent infringement case in United States Supreme Court in 2008.Through the analysis of Court opinions, the thesis then proposes some different suggestions about conversion of the patentee’ license strategies and how Taiwan OEMs should cope with the change in the future. 1.Legal Aspect: The defendant of a infringement case can apply for the doctrine of patent exhaustion, implied license, and sublicense. These doctrines are derived from patent right essential limitation. The U.S. law develops a lot of different models of patent exhaustion and implied license. It often depends on the interpretation of the terms of license agreement whether theses doctrines should be applied to individual case. This demonstrates the importance of precise definition and arrangement of contracts in advance. 2.Contract Aspect: The contract qualification of patent license agreement are different in Taiwan Law and the U.S. Law. Taiwan law intensifies licensor’s liability than American Law. Some Taiwan theories consider that when the licensee is accused of infringement because of the use of licensed articles, the licensor should have liability corresponding to the liability of warranty against defects in Civil Law. On the contrary, the majority of American theories deny such contract liability from law of licensor. Such difference corresponds to the different policies adopted in both countries. Since the defect warranty liability of the licensors are still in dispute, it will be the best way for risk management to distribute the infringement liability of both parties in contract explicitly. License agreement research has been fully developed in the U.S.. Grant Clause, Representations & Warranties and Indemnifications are all accompanied with details to be concerned. If the corporation unfortunately cannot obtain favorable clauses for its own side, it should evaluate risk to decide should it adopt another way for risk control, such as insurance, setting up risk reserves or litigation management. 3.Management Aspect: License is one of business models for corporation to make profit from patent. Its main purpose is to realize intangible patents into tangible profit. Accordingly, licensing strategy cannot be apart from commercial strategies. Patent license practice is still immature in Taiwan. Domestic corporations generally consider license as only a legal issue and do not properly construct a management system. In fact, license agreement design is a multidisciplinary subject and should coordinate with IP marketing strategies, business model, and enterprise operation procedure. Effective management system can establish necessary precautions against infringement liabilities. 4.Case Study: United States Supreme Court finally decided in favor of Quanta, Taiwan OEM, in Quanta v. LG case. The judgment does not mean a complete victory for Taiwan OEMs and neither did it indicate that the manufacturers do not need to bother for patent infringement by combining licensed components. Because the Court opinion only focuses within the scope of the license agreement by LG to Intel, without mentioning about if license conditions could break free of the doctrine of patent exhaustion. Furthermore, the stricter license conditions from the licensor is expectable after this case. Taiwan OEMs should make their best to find a solution.

本文將負面醫療結果(醫療傷害)統稱為醫療事故(medical incident)，而醫療事故中又分為醫療過失(medical negligence)、醫療不幸（medical mishap，又名醫療災禍）及醫療意外(medical accident)三種情況。造成醫療傷害可能是因為醫療的過失責任，也可能是無醫療過失責任，本文特意將無醫療過失責任再細分為無過失責任、非過失責任與無法律責任（自然死亡或自然病程）三種，並將「無過失責任」no fault liability一詞泛以「無關過失責任」稱之；醫療行為中可預知的合併症與副作用的「醫療不幸」及不可預知、不可抗力的「醫療意外」屬非過失責任範疇，而不可避免性的自然死亡及自然病程，則屬無法律責任的範疇。 責任負擔可分為賠償、補償、救濟三種。賠償者，以不法之侵權行為，致使他人受損害時，因而填補其所受之損害，謂之賠償，英文為indemnity。補償者，指根據該法所指定的人員敲定的額度提供的金錢補助，而不是指針對不法行為或違反契約依法起訴所獲得的補償性賠償金，英文為compensation。救濟者，特別指由國家向貧困者提供的財政幫助，英文為relief。 過失責任的歸責原因是醫療疏失，所以是以損害填補原則及不當得利禁止原則，以填補受害者所受損害及所失利益；因此，過失責任要負的是損害「賠償責任」。非過失責任的歸責原因包括醫療不幸（即副作用、合併症）與醫療意外兩種，因為醫師客觀上已盡注意義務，不論有無結果預知義務或結果迴避義務，醫師已盡力防阻，仍不免發生醫療傷害，故並無醫療疏失可言，應由國家社會對受害者予以救濟；因此，非過失責任理應由福利國家的救濟制度來負責。無關過失責任no fault liability的歸責原因是危險責任，針對所有醫療事故，不論對錯無關過失下，只要有了醫療傷害，加害人就予以被害人限額補償的基本保障。因為醫師身為危險責任主體，依報償責任理論（利之所存，險之所擔）、危險控制理論及危險分擔理論下必須承擔危險責任，因以，無關過失責任應負醫療事故補償責任。 賠償、補償、救濟三種責任負擔都可以分別採用基金模式或保險模式來解決；本文則認為，醫療過失責任宜採取醫師專業責任保險，予受害人損害賠償。醫療無關過失責任宜採取醫事人員強制責任保險，輔以醫療事故特別補償基金，予受害人基本保障補償。醫療非過失責任宜採取醫療風險救濟基金，予受害人風險救濟，急難救助。 故本文結論提出事故補償、風險救濟、損害賠償三階層的保險與基金制度架構，以解決醫療糾紛民事責任問題即；第一層事故補償—針對醫療事故，以醫事人員強制責任保險無關過失，限額補償；第二層風險救濟—針對醫療意外，整合醫療風險救濟基金定額救濟；第三層損害賠償—針對過失責任，以醫師責任保險損害填補。 / In this paper, we study negative outcomes associated with the delivery health care, which are collectively referred to as “medical incident”. This is further divided into “medical negligence”, “medical mishap” (also known as “medical disaster”), and “medical accidents”. Medical injuries may be in consequence of medical negligence or otherwise, that is they may be with fault or without fault. In this paper we further medical injuries without fault into three categories: (1) liability regardless of fault, (2) liability without fault, and (3) no legal liability. Notably, we refer to “no-fault liability” as “liability regardless of fault” to better distinguish its legal implications with respect to other kinds of medical injuries without fault. Predictable complications and side effects of medical treatments are considered “medical mishap”; unavoidable natural death or nature course of disease have “no legal liability”. The burden of duty can be divided into three categories: indemnity, compensation, and relief. Indemnity is secondary to the violation of rights leading to injury and damages. Compensation is set by appointed experts and given in direct consequence of the occurrence of the injury, and is independently of the determination of legality and contract fulfillment. Relief specifically refers to financial assistance given by government entities to those in need. At-fault liability follows medical negligence, and as such indemnity is given for reparation of damages and the prohibition of gains from the provision of negligent medical care. Causes of liability with no fault include medical mishaps and medical accidents. In these cases, the physician has fulfilled duties as medical professionals and in so doing have done their best to prevent medical incidents. Nevertheless due to circumstances beyond control, medical injuries occur. Because there is no negligence on the part of the physician, these losses are ideally dealt with by the governmental agencies. Liability regardless of fault attributes liability based on risk alone. Under this system, for all medical incidents, whether or not they are the consequence of negligence, the victim receives relief at a pre-determined amount. This relief serves as the basic protection of patients. Since the physician as the chief medical care provider is also at the center of medical risk, by principles of risk management, liability regardless of fault should in addition be organized as medical incidents compensation. The three forms of duty burden–indemnity, compensation, and relief–can be organized either as foundations or as insurances. We argue that duty burden for medical negligence is best managed by professional liability insurance to provide compensation to the victims. Medical liability regardless of fault is best managed by compulsory medical provider liability insurance with additional medical incidence compensation fund to provide at least a basic level of compensation to the victims. Medical liability without fault is best managed by medical risk relief fund for assistance for the victims. In conclusion, in this paper we analyze various forms of liability and management of medical risks, and propose the use of professional liability insurance for medical injuries with fault, compulsory liability insurance for liability without fault, and relief fund for liability regardless of fault, in the setting of medical incidence. This provides a comprehensive, three-layered solution to the emerging problem of proliferation of medical incident cases in the courts. The first layer is incidence compensation, directed at all medical incidents, via compulsory medical personnel liability insurance regardless of fault. The second layer is risk relief, directed at medical mishaps and medical accidents, via risk relief funds. The third layer is damage indemnity, directed at at-fault liability, via physician professional liability insurance, to fulfill the victims’ damages.

No description available.

近年來有關醫療法律糾紛案件有逐漸增加之趨勢，本文嘗試藉由實證分析，剖析目前實務與學理上之不同見解，簡要提出個人淺見。於實證分析前，本論文先就文獻理論作簡略之論述，首要說明醫療行為與醫療糾紛之相關概念，以界定醫師或醫療機構對其醫療行為應負之責任。並從實體法上論述醫療過失民事責任之基礎及其內涵，如醫療契約責任、醫療侵權責任、消保法與醫療法之適用，以及醫療過失之因果關係等。次就程序法上探討民事醫療訴訟舉證責任分配之基本原則，同時就美國法與德國法有關醫療過失舉證責任分配的調整於我國實務上之運用，作概略分析及探討。再者，鑑於法官於具體個案中判斷醫療糾紛之相關要件，往往需將訴訟資料送請醫療專業機構加以鑑定，因此，本文亦加以說明我國醫療鑑定制度運作之現況，並據此指出現行醫療糾紛鑑定問題之所在。 最後，本文就最高法院民事案件，分別從醫療糾紛判決背景資料之「年度」、「醫療機構層級」、「科別」、「上訴人」與「上訴結果」，以及醫療糾紛審判實務，如「醫療過失」、「因果關係的認定」、「民事責任請求權基礎及舉證責任之分配情況」、「告知義務」、「醫療鑑定在醫療糾紛應用」，進行實證分析，並依實證數據成果，提出「醫療科別屬性與醫療糾紛案件量多寡密切攸關」、「法院對於醫師在個案是否盡注意義務，應以理性醫師之注意標準綜合評價」、「針對醫療訴訟特性，適度分配醫病雙方之舉證責任」、「宜建立醫療傷害補償基金制度」、「醫事人員確切履行告知說明義務」、「健全現行病歷表之相關問題」、「關於醫療糾紛鑑定實務」暨「透過消保法填補醫療（院）組織疏失之責任」等八項結論及建議，以供實務與學術研究者未來對於醫療糾紛訴訟案件研析時之參考。 / Recently, legal cases concerning medical dispute have a tendency to increase gradually. This article tries to explore different viewpoints between practice and academic theory by empirical analysis and then briefly indicates some of my humble views. Before doing the empirical analysis, this article will briefly introduce the related literatures and theories. Firstly, explains related concepts between medical behavior and medical dispute to define the liability that doctor and medical institution should bear because of their medical behaviors. Then, discuss the basis and connotation of the civil liability for medical malpractice from the substantive law viewpoint, such as the liability for medical contract, medical tort liability, the implementation of the Consumer Protection Law and the Medical Care Act and the causality from the medical malpractice etc. Secondly, this article will discuss the basic principles of allocation of burden of proof for civil medical dispute from the procedural law viewpoint and in the same time, briefly analyze and research that whether it is appropriate to adopt the allocation of burden of proof for medical malpractice from American and German law in our own practice. Furthermore, respecting the fact that for judges to make their decisions in particular medical dispute cases, they always have to send action materials to professional medical institutes for identification, thus, this article also wants to explain the current situation of implementation of our medical identification system, and points out the problems of current medical dispute identification system accordingly. Lastly, this article will proceed empirical analysis according to the Year, Levels of the medical institutions, Divisions, Appellant, Result of Appeal from the background of the verdicts of the civil medical dispute cases awarded by the Supreme Court and according to the medical malpractice, the determination of the causality, the condition of basis of civil title of claiming and allocation of burden of proof, obligation of informing, medical identification in the medical dispute from the medical dispute trial practice. Base upon these results, this article indicates eight conclusions and suggestions for reference for the active participants and academic researchers in future medical dispute lawsuits: the attribution of the medical care division and the number of the medical dispute cases are closely related, court should do omnibus assessment using the standard of due diligence as a rational doctor to determine whether a doctor fulfill his duty of care in a specific case, with the particularity of medical actions in mind, appropriately allocate the burden of proof between doctor and patient, it is better to establish the compensation foundation system for medical damage, medical personnel should literally perform their obligation of informing, to refine the problems of current medical record, things concerning medical dispute identification practice and using the Consumer Protection Act to fill the vacancy that caused by the negligence of the medical institutions.

1933年(昭和8年)日本因全球經濟大蕭條引發「昭和農業恐慌」，加上帝國內部米穀供應嚴重過剩，米價大幅滑落，促使日本政府加強米榖方面的各項統制措施。本文試圖由1933年開始至1945年日本戰敗為止，日本政府為因應米穀供應過剩或者不足所採取的各項統制措施，及其對殖民地臺灣所產生的影響。日本政府實施之米穀統制政策，對臺灣米穀生產造成影響者，如1933年實施的「米穀統制法」、1936年的「米穀自治管理法」、1939年於臺灣內部實施的「臺灣米穀移出管理令」、1942年7月1日施行的「食糧管理法臺灣施行令」、1943年底的「臺灣食糧管理令」、還有1944年年中推行的「米穀增產及供出獎勵相關特別措施」等。由這些米穀統制法令及措施，可以了解日本的臺灣總督府用盡一切方法，就是為了使其最重要的民生主食「稻米」的生產及供應，能達到「自給自足」的目標。臺灣，作為日本殖民帝國下的一員，為配合帝國整體米穀供需穩定，對於「看天吃飯」的米穀生產，悲願地追求其自足目標。臺灣蓬萊米生產的擴大與臺日米價間的互動，連帶影響臺灣糖價及其他農作物的生產，並可藉此了解日本與臺灣之間，因稻米生產而衍生出的統制生產架構。 / In 1933, the world economic recession (the Great Depression) caused the imperial Japan into the so called 「Showa Agricultural Panic」 and made the imperial internal rice supply overwhelmingly surplus. Those　made the price of rice in Japan at that time fallen considerably, prompting the Japanese government to strengthen the rice control policies.This article, from 1933 to 1945, tries to explain the impacts of the Japanese government's various rice control policies which responded to the rice oversupply or insufficient upon the colonial Taiwan. The rice control policies Japanese government implemented made great influence upon Taiwan's rice production, such as in 1933, the enactment of the "Rice Control Law" ; in 1936, the enactment of the " Rice Self-management Law " ; in 1939, only in Taiwan enacted, the" Taiwan Rice Shipment Administration Order " ; in July 1 1942," The Staple Food Control Act's Taiwan Enforcement Order ” ; the end of 1943, “ Taiwan's Staple Food Control Administration Order ”; and promulgated in mid-1944 “Special Measures on Enhancing Rice Production and Awarding Shipment ",etc.Through those rice control laws and measures, we can understand the Japanese rulers exhausted to make people's livelihood, the production and supply of the most important staple food "rice", could achieve the goal of “self-sufficiency ".Taiwan, as one part of the Japanese colonial Empire, had to cooperate with the whole Empire’s rice supply and demand as stable as possible. Regarding the rice production which depends on the weather, Taiwan like Japan vows to pursue the goal of “self-sufficiency” with the earnest wish. The expansion of production of the Taiwan Formosan rice (Penglai rice) and the interaction of rice prices between the Taiwan and Japan influenced the Taiwan's sugar price and the production of other crops. Therefore, we can understand the control production structure caused by the rice production between Japan and Taiwan.

企業社會責任(corporate social responsibility，簡稱CSR)的概念與實務發展在近年來已成為一門企業永續經營的顯學。本研究認為，有別於一般組織外部利害關係人的觀點，身為內部觀察者的員工身分具有特殊性，不僅較外部利害關係人更接近公司核心，亦有機會參與公司的企業社會責任政策制定與活動。因此，本研究旨在建構一研究模型，以員工觀點了解企業社會責任認知及企業志工參與對組織公民行為之影響過程與結果，包含探究員工對企業社會責任認知與企業志工參與程度是否與組織認同有正向影響？員工企業社會責任認知與組織認同是否為知覺外部聲望所中介？當員工組織認同提高時，是否增進其工作滿足、組織承諾、顧客導向？ 　　本研究以Kim et al.(2010)所提出的企業社會責任影響員工企業認同模型概念為基礎，並拓展員工可能展現的反應及工作態度構念，以便利抽樣法回收有效紙本問卷201份、有效網路問卷115份，共計獲得316份樣本。經由驗證性因素分析與結構方程模式(Structural Equation Modeling, SEM)分析後得出研究結論如下： 1.知覺外部聲望確實為企業社會責任認知程度與組織認同之中介變數，員工的企業社會責任認知程度對知覺外部聲望有正向的影響，而更進一步影響組織認同。 2.企業志工參與和組織認同具有正向關係，佐證當企業的社會責任相關活動能滿足員工的心理需求時，員工將會傾向認同該企業。 3.組織認同與顧客導向、工作滿足及組織承諾皆存有正向的影響關係。 4.顧客導向、工作滿足和組織承諾皆與組織公民行為有正向的影響關係，其中顧客導向和組織承諾的影響力皆大於工作滿足。 / The increasing development of corporate social responsibility has become a prevalent concern for business sustainability practices. In comparison to the viewpoint of outside stakeholders, employees play unique roles for their company for two reasons: (1) employees are closer to corporate core business (2) employees participate more easily in CSR activities and policy formulation. Therefore, this study aims to establish a model to understand how employees’ perceived CSR and participation in employee volunteer program (EVP) relate to their organizational citizenship behavior. This study also investigates whether perceived CSR and EVP participation has positive effects on organizational identification; whether perceived external prestige mediates the relationship between perceived CSR and organizational identification; and whether organizational identification acts as the antecedent of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and customer orientation. The model concept is based on the model of CSR and employee-company identification established by Kim et al. (2010), and modified by adding some employees’ attitude constructs. The survey, conducted by convenience sampling, consists of a total of 316 participants whose companies have EVP. Utilizing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM), the results are as follows: 1.Perceived external prestige is a partial mediator between perceived CSR and organizational identification. Meanwhile, perceived CSR positively affects perceived external prestige, and perceived external prestige has positive relationship with organizational identification. 2.The relationship between EVP participation and organizational identification is positive, which means employees tend to identify with their company when they are mentally satisfied by CSR activities. 3.Organizational identification positively affects variables, such as customer orientation, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. 4.The attitude factors that positively affect employees’ organizational citizenship behavior include customer orientation, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Further, the impact of customer orientation and organizational commitment are greater than job satisfaction.

本研究為個案研究，以政大EMBA永續農業促進小組所創「政大一畝田」品牌專案為例，以深度訪談為研究方法，主要探討社會公民社團，如何透過策略聯盟方式，與策略夥伴為利害關係人以及社會共創新價值，並輔以相關文獻的深度分析，對農民團體策略聯盟以推廣有機農業提供具體建議。 根據農糧署2010/05發佈台灣有機認證農地共有4217公頃,僅佔所有農地的0.4％，在政府目前積極的倡導下，消費者認同與消費者支持已大幅增加，台灣的農民團體多自行組織，自產自銷，或者透過地方產銷班等，共同銷售予通路商、中盤商，但現行的銷售管道之銷量不大，又易被中盤商壓價，因此造成台灣有機小農的銷售困境。 研究者發起「政大EMBA永續農業促進小組」，透過資源分析以及環境分析，以組織內部成員之人脈資源、資金、商管知識以及服務熱忱作為基礎，再加上政大之社群資源，與農民團體合作，選定宜蘭三星行健有機合作社作為策略夥伴，推行「政大一畝田」契作稻田認養專案，建立以國內相關企業為目標客群之企業認養的銷售管道。 此公益項目增進台灣有機稻農的生計，也為認養企業與家庭提供樂活體驗、二次公益等社會企業責任的價值，更透過媒體公關行銷，使策略夥伴以及有機議題得到大眾關注，以提昇國民對有機農產的認同與支持。 / Based on the Case of NCCU's My-Farmland Project by National ChengChi University EMBA Sustainable Agriculture Promoting Organization, this paper will discuss how Non-Profit Organizations create new value of sustainability with other stakeholders by strategic alliance and offer some advice to the agricultural organization in Taiwan to promote sustainable agriculture. This paper will also provide literature review on civil society, sustainable agriculture, social enterprise and strategic alliance. According to the Council of Agriculture, the organic farmland officially recorded is 4217 hectares which only accounts for 0.4 percent of the total farmland in Taiwan. Now through the active promotion of the government, both the consumer identification and their support have increased dramatically. The agricultural organizations in Taiwan are made up almost entirely of farmers only. They produce and sell their products on their own. Their main sales channels are to wholesalers, distributors and some end consumers in low volumes. With low bargaining power, organic farmers in Taiwan have a difficult sales condition. This researcher initiated the "National Chengchi University EMBA sustainable agriculture promotion teams" to promote the Case of NCCU's My-Farmland Project through resources and environmental analysis together with the networking, capital, business management knowledge and dedicated services of the members of the NCCU or ganization, plus the community resources of the National Chengchi University. It is the goal of this project to assist the agricultural organizations in Taiwan in prospering and expanding their business. We have selected Ilan Samsung organic cooperatives as a strategic partner to promote and execute the above project and create a sales pipeline for relevant domestic enterprises as target customers. This charity project will provide Taiwan organic farmers with better lives, and also offer country life experiences for the corporations and families who join the project. Additionally, this project will allow the corporations to fulfill their corporate social responsibilities. Furthermore, with the promotion and attention through medias, this project will really increase the consumer identification and their support for the organic farmers in Taiwan.

鑑於近些年來國內陸續發生博達、雅新、力霸、嘉食化等震驚社會之企業掏空弊案，簽證會計師多遭金管會證期局迅即援引證交法第37條予以懲處，再移請會計師懲戒委員會依會計師法相關規定再予以提付懲戒，二者時間先後及處分內容有無可能涉及競合問題；且懲戒罰與行政罰可否併罰及是否涉有一事不二罰之原則？會計師懲戒有無行政罰法之適用？此為研究動機一也，其次，我國目前之會計師懲戒機關所為之懲戒程序，及覆審程序是否符合正當的法律程序？此為研究動機二也，另與我國會計師執業關係較密切之中國大陸、美、日等國之會計師懲戒制度亦有瞭解與比較之必要，藉收「他山之石，可以攻錯」之效，此為研究動機三也。再次，對於國內同為專門職業之律師、醫師、建築師等行業之懲戒制度亦有參考比較之必要，俾擷取其優點供為會計師懲戒制度改進之參考，此為研究動機四也。 本論文研究係就國內外有關會計師懲戒制度之相關文獻(含專書、期刊、雜誌、論文)及法令的探索，及本人過去擔任會計師懲戒委員及覆審委員之心得經驗來分析比較○1我國與中國大陸、美、日等國之懲戒制度，○2國內律師、醫師、建築師等專門職業之懲戒制度。其次，係要探究我國會計師懲戒有無行政罰法之適用及會計師懲戒罰與行政罰併罰之問題，瞭解目前會計師懲戒有無違一事不二罰之情事。再次，分析我國會計師懲戒及覆審程序現況及存在之問題。 壹、基於以上之研究動機及方法，針對上述探討主題，提出如下建議事項 一、會計師懲戒有無行政罰適用之建議 建議釐清會計師法第61條6款應付懲戒情事各款之處罰性質，明 文區分為行政罰或懲戒罰，並依其性質訂定相關之處分原則。 二、會計師同一原因事實而受有行政罰及懲戒罰併罰之建議 對於會計師涉有會計師法第61條中具行政罰性質之應付懲戒情事 ，其經相關主管機關，己依相關法規對違反行政法上義務之會計師予以 懲處後；再移付會計師懲戒委員會懲戒時，懲戒委員會在懲戒決議時， 應慮及一事不二罰之原則，予以衡酌移送前已裁處行政處分之輕重及是 否含紀律處分之考量；再予合適之懲戒處分。 貳、會計師懲戒及覆審程序之建議 一、對會計師公會全聯會之建議 建議訂定完整之「會計師違反紀律移付懲戒作業辦法或要點」。 二、對經濟部商業司之建議 建議訂定「會計師辦理決算書表查核簽證或工商登記業務違失移付 懲戒之作業辦法或要點」。 三、對金管會證期局之建議 建議修訂「會計師辦理證券交易法相關業務違失違規移付懲戒及行 政處分作業要點」，取得法律授權依據，並修訂其條文內容，以符實際。 四、對證交所及櫃買中心之建議 1.共同之建議事項 函請會計師就缺失情事，出具書面說明之通知書，應載明其缺失 之理由，俾令會計師事先有所因應。 2.對證交所之建議 建議證交所有價證券上市審議委員會，在討論涉案會計師之缺失 時，增訂「應函知會計師列席說明」，藉維護涉案會計師之權益。 3.對櫃買中心之建議 建議櫃買中心之審查會議在審查會計師涉有違失情事時，參酌證 交所增列外部專業具經驗之社會人士參與審查，俾更具公平性。除此 ，亦應訂定審查委員之迴避規定。 五、對各區國稅局之建議 建議修訂「會計師代理所得稅事務違失移付作業要點」之有關移付 懲戒程序，增訂○1除1-2名地區會計師代表外，增加具會計、稅務專業 及經驗之外部會計、法律、財稅專業人士。○2增訂審查委員會決議表決 之方式，俾資明確。 六、對報請及核轉懲戒後提出答辯及到會陳述之建議 建議修正會計師懲戒委員會及懲戒覆審委員會組織及審議規則(以 下簡稱組織及審議規則)第9條第1項為:「會計師懲戒委員會應將懲戒 事件通知被付懲戒會計師，命其於判決之次日起二十日內提出答辯或陳 述；如不依限提出答辯或到會陳述者，得逕行決議。」 七、有關得要求迴避程序方面之建議 建議「被付懲戒會計師對懲戒委員會及覆審委員會之委員有下列情 形之一者，得申請迴避。○1有前項情形而不自行迴避者，○2有前項以外 情形足認其執行職務有偏頗之處者。」 八、有關調查事實及證據程序方面之建議 建議:1.參採行政程序法第一章第六節「調查事實及證據」中之職權調 查之證據(第36條)、當事人申請調查證據(第37條)、要求當 事人提供文書(第40條)、選鑑定人(第 41 條)、實施勘驗(第 42條)及依調查結果認定事實(第43條)等規定，納入組織及審 議規則之增訂條文。 2.可考慮將會計師公會全聯會之「專業責任鑑定委員會」列為懲 戒及覆審委員會之專業鑑定人。 九、有關聽證程序方面之建議 建議組織及審議規則增訂對會計師懲戒之，擬建議之「除名」或停 止執業期間較長者(如一年以上)之處分，採「不公開言詞辯論」之聽證 方式，命被付懲戒會計師與移付單位，就事實法理作雙向溝通。 十、有關組織適法方面之建議 建議:1.修訂組織及審議規則，將懲戒及覆審委員會主任委員改由委員 互選產生。 2.修法明確排除具民意代表身分之人士出任懲戒及覆審委員。 十一、有關懲戒委員會會議表決方式之建議 建議:1.組織及審議規則增訂，對於「除名」剥奪會計師工作權之處分 決議，將其同意門檻提高至以三分之二以上委員出席，出席委 員三分之二以上同意行之。 2.組織及審議規則增訂負責審查懲戒事件之委員，即不能參與懲 戒或覆審委員會之該懲戒事件之表決。 3.組織及審議規則增訂懲戒委員會或覆審委員，如有迴避事由者 ，則不計入應出席人數之計算。 4.組織及審議規則增訂，在委員會之評議意見有三說以上，均未 達通過門檻時，以最不利於被付懲戒人之恴見，順次併入次不 利於被付懲戒人之意見至達過半數為止。 十二、會計師懲戒處分透明度之建議 建議將「會計師違反會計師法事件應予懲戒處分參考原則」公開透 明化。 十三、程序外接觸之禁止建議 建議組織及審議規則中增訂:「懲戒及覆審委員在懲戒及覆審程序 中，除基於職務上必要外，不得與當事人或代表其利益之人，為懲戒及 覆審程序外之接觸。懲戒及覆審委員與當事人或代表其利益之人，為懲 戒及覆審程序外之接觸時，應將所有往來之書面文件附卷，並對其他當 事人公開。前項接觸非以書面接觸為之者，應作成書面紀錄，載明接觸 對象、時間、地點及內容」。 十四、守密之建議 建議組織及審議規則中增訂:「懲戒及覆審委員和兼辦秘書工作之 相關人員，均應簽訂保密書。委員違反保密協議者，得經懲戒及覆審委 員會予以解任，兼辦秘書工作之人員違反者，得予解任兼任工作並予以 一定之懲處」。 十五、覆審迴避程序之建議 建議於組織及審議規則第6條第1項自行迴避方面之規定，增列一 款:「曾參與前審之討論及決議之委員」。 十六、有關覆審階段之請求閱覽、抄錄、影印或攝影卷內之文書程序之建議 建議組織及審議規則增訂:「對於懲戒委員會處分之證據資料，被 付懲戒會計師得請求閱覽、抄錄或影印之覆審委員會非有正當理由不得 拒絶」。 十七、有關覆審階段之調查事實及證據程序之建議 建議:1.參酌我國訴願法第67條至第69條規定，於組織及審議規則中 增訂有關調查事實及證據程序之條文，另在懲戒程序階段建議 參酌行政程序法第36條至43條增訂之事項，如不在上項建議 範圍時，建議亦納入覆審程序之適用範圍。 2.可考慮將會計師公會全聯會「專業責任鑑定委員會」列為懲戒 覆審委員會之專業鑑定人。 十八、覆審階段之聽證程序建議 建議組織及審議規則增訂對會計師原懲戒處分，如為「除名」或「 停業」期間較長(如一年以上)者；採「不公開言詞辯論」之聽證方式， 命申請覆審之會計師與原懲戒委員會，就事實、法理作雙向辯論溝通。 十九、會計師懲戒處分暫停執行之建議 建議組織及審議規則增訂:「凡屬覆審階段或行政訴訟階段之懲戒 案件，予以暫停執行，待全案終局確定後，再予執行」。 參、其他建議事項 一、懲戒及覆審委員人選之建議 建議:1.增加會計師擔任懲戒及覆審委員名額。 2.保留小型會計師事務所之會計師出任懲戒委員之名額。 二、對懲戒處分方式之建議 建議修正會計師法第62條第一項，增訂:「○1限制執行業務範圍， ○2命接受額外一定時數之教育進修或同業評鑑」，第二項增訂：「會計師 懲戒處分內容其性質不相牴觸者，得合併為一懲戒處分」。 三、有關會計師懲戒處分從重、從輕、減輕之建議 建議在組織及審議規則中增訂: 1.會計師有下列情形之一者應予從重懲戒 ○1同時具有兩種或兩種以上應予懲戒行為者。 ○2在兩年內發生兩次或兩次以上，同一性質應予懲戒的行為者。 ○3對投訴人、舉報人、證人等有關人員打擊報復者。 ○4違規行為發生後編造、隠匿、銷毀證據者。 2.會計師有下列情形之一者得從輕、減輕懲戒 ○1初次違規並且情節輕微者。 ○2主動報告其違規行為者。 ○3主動配合查處其違規行為者。 ○4自覺糾正違規行為及時採取有效措施，防止或減輕不良後果者。 四、懲戒裁處權時效訂定之建議 建議修正會計師法，增訂會計師懲戒之裁處權之時效。 五、對會計師懲戒停業處分期間監管之建議 建議金管會訂定「會計師懲戒停止執業期間之監管辦法或作業要點 」。