- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 (0.055 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"soviet law"" "subject:"bouviet law""
| 1 |
Empty form and determination : Analysing decree No. 21-P by the Russian Constitutional Court / Пустая форма и решительность : Анализ постановления 21-П Конституционного Суда РФRudford, Felix January 2022 (has links)
What does it mean when there is nothing behind the façade? The schism between Russia and the international society reached a new level of depth as of February 2022. Тhis predicament was facilitated by events and developments prior to it, and this build-up also saw itself reflected in the sphere of international law. There was a crucial moment in 2015 when the Russian Constitutional Court passed decree 21-P. This decision was the culmination of a long legal struggle between the Russian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights. The conclusion was that if a judgment of an international court is incompatible with the Russian Constitution, then the execution of measures foreseen in the judgment of its legal order can be prevented. This thesis seeks to delineate in what way key aspects of legal scholar Mikhail Antonov’s dissertation Formalism, Realism and Conservatism in Russian Law are found manifest in the linguistic properties and legal methodology applied by the Constitutional Court in decree 21-P. The document concerning decision 21-P was subjected to a three-step assessment including an analysis of the document’s quantitative properties, a discourse analysis, as well as an analysis of the court’s legal methodology. The research results indicate that Antonov’s conception of the Russian legal system expresses itself in a diffuse multi-dimensional system in decision 21-P. It is a multifaceted pattern where different elements can elicit formalism, realism, or both simultaneously, with different degrees of prevalence. / Eсли за фасадом ничего нет, что это значит? Раскол между Россией и международным сообществом достиг нового уровня после февраля 2022 года. Этому затруднительному положению способствовали предшествующие ему события и эта эскалация нашла отражение и в сфере международного права. Переломный момент был в 2015 году, когда Конституционный Суд РФ принял постановление № 21-П. Это решение стало кульминацией длительной правовой борьбы между Конституционным судом России и Европейским судом поправам человека. Был сделан вывод о том, что в случае несовместимости решения международного суда с Конституцией РФ исполнение предусмотренных в решении мер его правопорядка может быть предотвращено. В данной диссертации делается попытка определить, каким образом ключевые аспекты диссертации профессора Михаила Антонова «Формализм, реализм и консерватизм в российском праве» проявляются в лингвистических свойствах и правовой методологии Конституционного Суда РФ в постановление № 21-П. Документ Был подвергнут трехступенчатой оценке, включающей анализ количественных характеристик документа, дискурсивный анализ, а также анализ правовой методологии суда. Результаты исследования показывают, что концепция российской правовой системы Антонова выражается в многоаспектной системе в решении № 21-П. Это многогранный паттерн, в котором разные элементы могут вызывать формализм, реализм или и то, и другое одновременно, с разной степенью преобладания. / Vad betyder det om det inte finns något bakom fasaden? Schismen mellan Ryssland och det internationella samhället nådde en ny nivå i februari 2022. Denna splittring förutsågs av händelser som ägde rum i förväg och finns även återspeglade inom internationell rättssfär. Det fanns ett avgörande ögonblick 2015, när den ryska författningsdomstolen antog dekret 21-P. Detta beslut var kulmen på en lång rättskamp mellan den ryska författningsdomstolen och den europeiska domstolen för mänskliga rättigheter. Slutsatsen var att om en dom från en internationell domstol är oförenlig med den ryska konstitutionen, kan implementeringen av åtgärder som förutses i bedömningen av dess rättsordning förhindras. Detta arbete syftar till att utforska vilket sätt de centrala aspekterna av rättsforskaren Mikhail Antonovs avhandling Formalism, Realism and Conservatism in Russian Law manifesteras i de språkliga egenskaper och den juridiska metodik som tillämpas av författningsdomstolen i dekret 21-P. Det officiella dokumentet rörande beslut 21-P genomgick en trestegsanalys som inkluderar en granskning av textens kvantitativa egenskaper, en diskursanalys samt en analys av domstolens juridiska metodik. Forskningsresultaten indikerar att Antonovs uppfattning om det ryska rättssystemet uttrycker sig i ett diffust flerdimensionellt system i beslut 21-P. Det är ett mångfacetterat mönster där olika element kan framkalla formalism, realism, eller båda samtidigt, med olika grader av prevalens.
|
| 2 |
A Pragmatic Standard of Legal ValidityTyler, John 2012 May 1900 (has links)
American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law.
These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism.
In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method.
This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior.
The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent.
The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will.
Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil.
|
Page generated in 0.0632 seconds