- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 1 to 5 of 5 (0.077 seconds)Spelling suggestions: "subject:"war communist""
| 1 |
A formação teórica de Bukhárin e a transição na URSS: 1906-1921 /Bertochi, Aparecido Francisco. January 2005 (has links)
Orientador: Marcos Tadeu Del Roio / Banca: Antonio Carlos Mazzeo / Banca: Armen Mamigonian / Resumo: Esta pesquisa objetiva resgatar a formação teórica e política do comunista de esquerda Nikolai Ivanovitch Bukhárin, por meio da análise de suas obras, como da consulta às obras de Lenin, de historiadores e de comentadores, visando a compreensão do processo de transicão direta ao comunismo na URSS, entre 1918-1921. Por meio de sua profícua produção política Bukhárin foi um dos teóricos bolcheviques que mais contribuiu, entre 1912 até 1921, ao lado de Lenin, para o aprofundamento das questões do imperialismo, do Estado e da transição, particularmente, da soviética, no interior das correntes marxistas contemporâneas. Foi a partir da elaboração de sua teoria sobre o imperialismo e, posteriormente, também da de Lenin, que se formaram, nas correntes marxistas contemporâneas, as concepções atuais que embasam a compreensão teórica do imperialismo e da globalização. Autor de teses originais e muito polêmicas, Bukhárin foi durante boa parte de sua vida membro e um dos líderes do grupo dos comunistas de esquerda, e esteve em frontal oposição às propostas e idéias de Lenin, em diversas circunstâncias. Porém, isso nunca foi motivo suficiente para provocar uma ruptura efetiva entre ambos. Mas, ao contrário, estes debates contribuíram muito para o amadurecimento do pensamento teórico destes dois importantes formuladores da primeira tentativa concreta de transição ao socialismo, buscada durante a constituição da URSS. / Abstract: This research goals to redeem the "left communist" Nikolai Ivanovitch Bukhárin theoretical and politics education, analyzing his works and historians like Lenin, to understand the process of direct transition to the communism in URSS, between 1918 -1921. Bukharin was one of the bolcheviques theoretical who contributes between 1912 - 1921 by Lenin's side to imperialism and State questions, about present Marxism works. After his theory about "imperialism" (and also, after Lenin theory about the same subject), it raises present conceptions about imperialism and globalization. Author of polemics and originals thesis, he was member and leader of the "left communist group" and was against Lenin ideas many time. However, this thing was never a reason to break it other. On the contrary, these debates has a hand in rise of Lenin and Burkhárin theoretical think. Both of than were creators of first right tentative of the transition until socialism during the URSS constitution. / Mestre
|
| 2 |
A formação teórica de Bukhárin e a transição na URSS: 1906-1921Bertochi, Aparecido Francisco [UNESP] January 2005 (has links) (PDF)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:23:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2005Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:50:41Z : No. of bitstreams: 1
bertochi_af_me_mar.pdf: 465608 bytes, checksum: 44078e06f2f629c4b5610084283ddb80 (MD5) / Esta pesquisa objetiva resgatar a formação teórica e política do comunista de esquerda Nikolai Ivanovitch Bukhárin, por meio da análise de suas obras, como da consulta às obras de Lenin, de historiadores e de comentadores, visando a compreensão do processo de transicão direta ao comunismo na URSS, entre 1918-1921. Por meio de sua profícua produção política Bukhárin foi um dos teóricos bolcheviques que mais contribuiu, entre 1912 até 1921, ao lado de Lenin, para o aprofundamento das questões do imperialismo, do Estado e da transição, particularmente, da soviética, no interior das correntes marxistas contemporâneas. Foi a partir da elaboração de sua teoria sobre o imperialismo e, posteriormente, também da de Lenin, que se formaram, nas correntes marxistas contemporâneas, as concepções atuais que embasam a compreensão teórica do imperialismo e da globalização. Autor de teses originais e muito polêmicas, Bukhárin foi durante boa parte de sua vida membro e um dos líderes do grupo dos comunistas de esquerda, e esteve em frontal oposição às propostas e idéias de Lenin, em diversas circunstâncias. Porém, isso nunca foi motivo suficiente para provocar uma ruptura efetiva entre ambos. Mas, ao contrário, estes debates contribuíram muito para o amadurecimento do pensamento teórico destes dois importantes formuladores da primeira tentativa concreta de transição ao socialismo, buscada durante a constituição da URSS. / This research goals to redeem the left communist Nikolai Ivanovitch Bukhárin theoretical and politics education, analyzing his works and historians like Lenin, to understand the process of direct transition to the communism in URSS, between 1918 -1921. Bukharin was one of the bolcheviques theoretical who contributes between 1912 - 1921 by Lenin's side to imperialism and State questions, about present Marxism works. After his theory about imperialism (and also, after Lenin theory about the same subject), it raises present conceptions about imperialism and globalization. Author of polemics and originals thesis, he was member and leader of the left communist group and was against Lenin ideas many time. However, this thing was never a reason to break it other. On the contrary, these debates has a hand in rise of Lenin and Burkhárin theoretical think. Both of than were creators of first right tentative of the transition until socialism during the URSS constitution.
|
| 3 |
Postoj Československa k vývoji čínsko-sovětských vztahů v 50. a 60. letech 20. století / Czechoslovakia and the Development of Sino-Soviet Relations in the 1950s and 1960sCrhák, Ondřej January 2017 (has links)
This thesis discusses the role of Czechoslovakia within the framework of the Chinese- Soviet split. Based on the analysis of archival sources, it explores Czechoslovak proceedings within the given issue at the diplomatic level as well as the Communist Party level. Its aim is to confirm or disprove the statement that Czechoslovakia was a so-called small player in this dispute and acted more independently on the USSR policy . It focuses on mutual Czechoslovak-Chinese relations and their development in the given period, i.e. 1950-1969. It analyzes the progress of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia from its viewpoint at international conferences of Communist and workers' organizations, but also at Party sessions. The thesis also describes the Chinese-Soviet split in the Third World and its influence on Czechoslovak policy. Last but not least, the thesis focuses on the factors that influenced the formation of the Czechoslovak attitude on this issue. The thesis studies given range of issues with the help of archival sources of Czech provenance and foreign materials available in electronic form.
|
| 4 |
Combating insurgency can lessons from the Huk Rebellion apply to Iraq? /Phares, Matthew H. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Master of Military Studies)-Marine Corps Command and Staff College, 2008. / Title from title page of PDF document (viewed on: Jan 12, 2010). Includes bibliographical references.
|
| 5 |
A Pragmatic Standard of Legal ValidityTyler, John 2012 May 1900 (has links)
American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law.
These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism.
In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method.
This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior.
The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent.
The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will.
Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil.
|
Page generated in 0.0865 seconds