- About
-
The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers
to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is
provided by the
Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
Search results
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 (0.071 seconds)| 1 |
Fundamentos das normas extrafiscais : a perspectiva jusnaturalista como alternativa ?s insufici?ncias do juspositivismo e do neoconstitucionalismoKronbauer, Eduardo Lu?s 21 March 2018 (has links)
Submitted by PPG Direito (ppgdir@pucrs.br) on 2018-04-17T19:20:05Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
EDUARDO_LUIS_KRONBAUER_DIS.pdf: 1792721 bytes, checksum: 3b5e5a4d3bcf3f2bc31c2673af2e659e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-04T17:49:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
EDUARDO_LUIS_KRONBAUER_DIS.pdf: 1792721 bytes, checksum: 3b5e5a4d3bcf3f2bc31c2673af2e659e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-04T18:09:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
EDUARDO_LUIS_KRONBAUER_DIS.pdf: 1792721 bytes, checksum: 3b5e5a4d3bcf3f2bc31c2673af2e659e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-03-21 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / This study aims to develop a reasoning of tax rules with simulative function under the point of view of the natural law, indicating the natural law theory perspective as the best alternative against to the other existent legal theories standpoint. First, the study presents, in a critical view, the philosophical preconditions of the two doctrines that predominate the actual paradigm: legal positivism and ?neoconstitucionalism?. It demonstrates that these theories are in the opposite extremes and follow incommunicable ways, and both show insufficiencies in its justifications. Therefore, this present research sustains that the preconditions capable of revealing a more efficient and complete reasoning of the inducing tax rules can be find in the theory of natural law. Thereby, the justification presented in this paper stablishes the idea of natural law, basic goods, justice, finalities. Legitimacy and form of law as the elements capable of justify the taxation with simulative function. / O presente trabalho versa sobre a fundamenta??o das normas extrafiscais sob o prisma do direito natural, apontando a perspectiva jusnaturalista como a melhor alternativa em rela??o ?s demais correntes jusfilos?ficas existentes. Na primeira parte, s?o apresentados, de forma cr?tica, os pressupostos das duas correntes que predominam as fundamenta??es presentes no paradigma atual: positivismo jur?dico e neoconstitucionalismo. Demonstra-se que estas teorias caminham em extremos e n?o se comunicam entre si, sendo que ambas apresentam insufici?ncias em suas fundamenta??es. Dessa forma, sustenta-se que os pressupostos capazes de apresentar uma fundamenta??o mais eficiente e completa das normas extrafiscais est?o na teoria do direito natural. A fundamenta??o trazida no trabalho estabelece que os elementos capazes de justificar a tributa??o com finalidade de indu??o de comportamento dos contribuintes, com maior razoabilidade, est?o presentes na ideia de lei natural, bens b?sicos, justi?a, finalidades, legitimidade e forma.
|
| 2 |
Recherches sur la notion de services d’intérêt économique général (SIEG). / Researches on services of general economique interest (sgei) juridical notionKouassi, Kouakou Samuel 24 October 2017 (has links)
En retraçant la trajectoire de l’évolution du concept de SIEG vers la notion juridique de SIEG,notre recherche met l’accent sur l’évolution d’un concept juridique aux contours flous et à laportée incertaine, notamment pour les juristes français, dans sa perception initiale, vers unenotion juridique porteuse d’un idéal social ; le modèle social Union européen. Ainsi, cettethèse aboutit-elle, premièrement, à redessiner les contours de la notion de SIEG en prenant encompte sa capacité à faire peau neuve de la notion d’intérêt général, familière au droit publicfrançais, progressivement devenue « intérêt économique général — ou intérêt généraléconomique » dans le cadre strict du concept qui nous retient ; intérêt économique généraladossé par ailleurs aux idéologies et principes juridiques européens de la concurrence (article106-2 TFUE) et de régulation économique (article 106-3 TFUE) (Partie 1).En second lieu, la recherche explore ce que l’on pourrait dénommer les « vertus » du régimejuridique des SIEG longtemps passées sous silence par la doctrine : protections juridiquesofferte aux acteurs et consommateurs des prestations de SIEG et position axiologique dumodèle social Union européenne des SIEG consacrée par les articles 14 TFUE et le Protocolenuméro 26 sur les services d’intérêt général qui nous semble contenu dans la notion même deSIEG ou pour le moins en découler fonctionnellement (Partie 2). / Retracing the evolutionary trajectory of the Service of General Economic Interest (SGEI)concept concept to the legal notion of SGEI, my research focuses on the evolution of a legalconcept with uncertain outlines as initially perceived, particularly with reference to the Frenchpublic law theory, towards a juridical notion which carries a social ideal: the European Unionsocial model. The thesis thus leads, first, to the redrawing of the concept of SGEI taking intoaccount its ability to revamp the notion of general interest, a notion familiar to French publiclaw, gradually becoming "economic interest" generally or "general interest economicallyspeaking" within the strict framework of the principles of EU Law relating to competition(Article 106 (2) TFEU) and economic regulation (Article 106-3 TFEU) (Part 1).Secondly, my research explores what might be called the "virtues" of the legal regime ofSGEIs that have long been ignored by the doctrine: legal protection offered to actors andconsumers of SGEI services and the axiological position of the European Union social modelof SGEI enshrined in Articles 14 TFEU and Protocol 26 on services of general interest, whichseems to us contained in the concept of SGEI or at least functional (Part 2)
|
| 3 |
A Defense of Soft Positivism: Justice and Principle ProcessesDiener, Keith William 12 June 2006 (has links)
This thesis addresses the historic debate between natural law theorists and positivists. After providing a foundation for the debate by discussing the thirteenth century natural law theory of St. Thomas Aquinas and the criticisms of it by positivist philosopher John Austin, this thesis turns to the theory of H.L.A. Hart. My primary aim is to outline a defense of the soft positivism of H.L.A. Hart in face of the criticisms of Ronald Dworkin by appealing to two nonexclusive roots of moral principles in the law: justice and criminal law.
|
| 4 |
On the Stephen Macedo and John Finnis Exchange: Natural Law, Liberalism, and Homosexuality: A Critical AssessmentColeman, Brian B 31 July 2006 (has links)
This essay is an exploration of the debate between John Finnis and Stephen Macedo on the value of homosexuality. In “Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?” Finnis, a natural law theorist, rejects value-neutralist arguments, stating that the political community can and should make value judgments about its members’ life-choices and that such normative evaluations are compatible with liberalism. Particularly, Finnis argues that homosexuality is in its essence always harmful and degrading, thus unable to participate in the basic human goods it imitates. Furthermore, he argues that the political community in liberal democratic societies is justified in discouraging homosexual conduct as a viable way of life. Macedo, while also rejecting pure value-neutralist liberalism, carefully considers but rejects Finnis’s argument, which rests on an unrealistic description of value and ends of human sexual activity.
|
| 5 |
Human Agency in Law and JurisprudenceMurphy, Jessica 04 1900 (has links)
<p>This dissertation explores the way in which different conceptions of human agency have helped to shape the course of jurisprudential thought. The overarching aim is to bring to the surface the deeper commitments of Hartian positivism in its various engagements with rival accounts of the nature of law. In particular, I argue that although contemporary positivists take their account of law to be metaphysically noncommittal, views of what it is to be a human agent continue to motivate, if implicitly, their positions on such enduring jurisprudential questions as the nature and source of law’s normativity, the relationship between law and morality, and so on. In order to better understand these debates, we must therefore understand better the relationship between a theory of law and the conception of human nature that drives it.</p> / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
|
| 6 |
Etický rozměr lidské práce v kontextu svobody a důstojnosti člověka / Labor aspects from the perspective of ethics and Christianity, developing countries workers' protection projectsVLČKOVÁ, Jana January 2012 (has links)
In this dissertation I am analysing certain aspects of labour, especially the ones that are of significant interest to moral philosophy within the church and its catholic doctrine. In the same time I identify the foundation for freedom and dignity of labouring human being that are being degraded especially in the present time economisation process. Further, I outline the issues associated with the changes within the division of labour from industrial revolution to present day and in the same time I present issues connected with labouring human being vs. human capital. Because freedom is the foundation of humanity I also describe issues connected with human rights in the context of universal and natural law. In this way I analyse Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its defence in an intercultural environment. Lastly, besides those theoretical concepts, I evaluate an Amnesty International CR project called "Business That is Worth It" which aims at supporting companies to a responsible management of employees rights protection especially in developing countries.
|
| 7 |
A Pragmatic Standard of Legal ValidityTyler, John 2012 May 1900 (has links)
American jurisprudence currently applies two incompatible validity standards to determine which laws are enforceable. The natural law tradition evaluates validity by an uncertain standard of divine law, and its methodology relies on contradictory views of human reason. Legal positivism, on the other hand, relies on a methodology that commits the analytic fallacy, separates law from its application, and produces an incomplete model of law.
These incompatible standards have created a schism in American jurisprudence that impairs the delivery of justice. This dissertation therefore formulates a new standard for legal validity. This new standard rejects the uncertainties and inconsistencies inherent in natural law theory. It also rejects the narrow linguistic methodology of legal positivism.
In their stead, this dissertation adopts a pragmatic methodology that develops a standard for legal validity based on actual legal experience. This approach focuses on the operations of law and its effects upon ongoing human activities, and it evaluates legal principles by applying the experimental method to the social consequences they produce. Because legal history provides a long record of past experimentation with legal principles, legal history is an essential feature of this method.
This new validity standard contains three principles. The principle of reason requires legal systems to respect every subject as a rational creature with a free will. The principle of reason also requires procedural due process to protect against the punishment of the innocent and the tyranny of the majority. Legal systems that respect their subjects' status as rational creatures with free wills permit their subjects to orient their own behavior. The principle of reason therefore requires substantive due process to ensure that laws provide dependable guideposts to individuals in orienting their behavior.
The principle of consent recognizes that the legitimacy of law derives from the consent of those subject to its power. Common law custom, the doctrine of stare decisis, and legislation sanctioned by the subjects' legitimate representatives all evidence consent.
The principle of autonomy establishes the authority of law. Laws must wield supremacy over political rulers, and political rulers must be subject to the same laws as other citizens. Political rulers may not arbitrarily alter the law to accord to their will.
Legal history demonstrates that, in the absence of a validity standard based on these principles, legal systems will not treat their subjects as ends in themselves. They will inevitably treat their subjects as mere means to other ends. Once laws do this, men have no rest from evil.
|
Page generated in 0.0797 seconds