No description available.

O transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo (TOC) é um transtorno psiquiátrico freqüentemente crônico caracterizado pela presença de obsessões e/ou compulsões. Tratamentos de primeira linha, que incluem os inibidores seletivos da recaptura de serotonina (ISRS) e a terapia cognitivocomportamental com técnicas de exposição e prevenção de respostas não conseguem melhora satisfatória em até 40% dos pacientes. Para estes casos, existem evidências que apóiam o uso de antipsicóticos como a quetiapina, na potencialização dos ISRS. No entanto, os antipsicóticos são eficazes para apenas um terço dos pacientes e estão associados a eventos adversos preocupantes no longo prazo. Este estudo tem como objetivo comparar a eficácia da potencialização do ISRS fluoxetina com a clomipramina, um inibidor de recaptura da serotonina não-seletivo, ou quetiapina, versus placebo. Para inclusão neste estudo, os pacientes precisavam: relatar os sintomas de TOC como sendo seu problema principal; estar em uso da dose máxima tolerada ou recomendada de fluoxetina por pelo menos oito semanas; ter um escore total na escala Yale Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Scale (YBOCS) de pelo menos 16; e ter tido uma redução do escore inicial da YBOCS menor do que 35% após tratamento com fluoxetina. Os pacientes (N=54) foram alocados por meio de um método de minimização em três grupos: quetiapina (até 200mg/dia) com fluoxetina (até 40mg/dia) (QTP/FLX) (N=18); clomipramina (até 75mg/dia) com fluoxetina (até 40mg/dia) (CMI/FLX) (N=18); e placebo com dose máxima de fluoxetina (até 80mg/dia) (PLC/FLX) (N=18). Avaliadores cegos obtiveram os escores da YBOCS nas semanas 0 e 12. As análises foram realizadas por intenção de tratar, com imputação do tipo hot-deck para os dados faltantes. Teste de Wald por ANCOVA não paramétrico para medidas ordinais repetidas foi utilizado para avaliar efeitos de grupo, tempo e interação para os resultados da YBOCS e desfechos secundários, tendo as medidas iniciais como co-variáveis. Os resultados da impressão clínica global de melhora (ICG-M) foram utilizados para classificar os pacientes como respondedores ou não-respondedores. O teste qui-quadrado foi utilizado para avaliar a freqüência de respondedores em cada grupo. Foram feitos gráficos de percentis e análises de sensibilidade. Quarenta pacientes (74%) completaram o seguimento. Não foram observados efeitos adversos graves. Pacientes dos grupos PLC/FLX (YBOCS final: média=10, DP=4; redução em relação ao inicial: média=49%, DP=0.49) e CMI/FLX (YBOCS final: média=10, DP=4; redução em relação ao inicial: média=46%, DP=0.51) melhoraram significativamente e tiveram uma melhor resposta quando comparados aos do grupo QTP/FLX (YBOCS final: média=13, DP=3; redução em relação ao inicial: média=18%, DP=0.20; p=0.001). Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas para as medidas secundárias. Os gráficos de percentis confirmaram que os pacientes do grupo QTP/FLX pioraram com maior freqüência e melhoraram menos do que os pacientes dos outros dois grupos. Análises de sensibilidade demonstraram que outros métodos de análise não modificaram significativamente os resultados. Este é o primeiro estudo duplo-cego controlado de potencialização de ISRS com clomipramina em TOC e também o primeiro a comparar a eficácia de potencialização com quetiapina à de outro potencializador. Limitações deste estudo incluem o uso de doses baixas dos potencializadores, taxas de abandono diferentes para os três grupos e período curto de seguimento. Apesar dessas limitações, nossos resultados apóiam o uso da clomipramina como potencializador (principalmente para aqueles que não toleram doses altas de fluoxetina) e o aumento do período de seguimento com fluoxetina em dose máxima antes de uma potencialização medicamentosa ser tentada / Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) manifests often as a chronic illness and is characterized by the presence of obsessions and compulsions. Firstline treatment options, which include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and cognitive-behavior therapy with exposure and response prevention techniques, fail to achieve a satisfactory response in up to 40% of patients. Current evidence supports the augmentation of SSRI with antipsychotics, such as quetiapine. However, anti-psychotics are effective for only one-third of the patients and have been associated with severe long term side effects. This study aimed to compare clomipramine and quetiapine augmentation of the SSRI fluoxetine. Previously to the beginning of this trial all patients had to: report OCD as they primary diagnosis, be taking the highest tolerated or recommended dose of fluoxetine for at least eight weeks, have a current Yale Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) total of at least 16, and have had a reduction of less than 35% of the initial total YBOCS score with fluoxetine treatment. Fifty-four patients were allocated trough a minimization procedure in one of three arms: quetiapine (up to 200 mg/day) plus fluoxetine (up to 40 mg/day) (QTP/FLX) (N=18), clomipramine (up to 75 mg/day) plus fluoxetine (up to 40 mg/day) (CMI/FLX) (N=18) and 18 placebo plus sustained maximum dose fluoxetine (up to 80 mg/day) (PLC/FLX) (N=18). Blinded raters collected YBOCS scores at weeks 0 and 12. Analyses were made with intention-to-treat and hot-deck imputation of missing data. Wald statistics from non-parametric ANCOVA for ordinal categorical repeated measures were used to evaluate group, time and interaction effects for YBOCS scores and secondary outcome measures considering initial measures as covariates. Clinical Global Impression scores of improvement (CGI-I) were used to classify individuals in responders or non-responders. Chi-square was used to evaluate frequency of responders in each group. Percentile-plots were built and sensitivity analyses were performed. Completion rate was 74% (N=40). No severe adverse events occurred during the trial. Patients from the PLC/FLX (final YBOCS score: mean=10, SD=4; reduction from initial YBOCS score: mean=49%, SD=0.49) and CMI/FLX (final YBOCS score: mean=10, SD=4; reduction from initial YBOCS score: mean=46%, SD=0.51) groups improved significantly and also had a significantly better response than the ones from the QTP/FLX group (final YBOCS score: mean=13, SD=3; reduction from initial YBOCS score: mean=18%, SD=0.20; p=0.001). No significant differences were evident for secondary outcome measures. Percentile plots confirmed that patients in the QTP/FLX group got worse more often or improved less than in the other two groups. Sensitivity analyses showed that other analytical methods did not significantly change results. This is the first double-blind placebo-controlled trial of clomipramine augmentation and the first to compare quetiapine augmentation with another active augmenter. Limitations of our trial include the use of low dose of augmenters, differential drop-out rates for each treatment arm and short period of follow-up. Despite these limitations, our results support the use of clomipramine as an augmentation strategy (mainly for those who do not tolerate higher doses of fluoxetine) and the prorogation of the period of maximum dose of fluoxetine before an augmentation is tried

O transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo (TOC) é um transtorno psiquiátrico freqüentemente crônico caracterizado pela presença de obsessões e/ou compulsões. Tratamentos de primeira linha, que incluem os inibidores seletivos da recaptura de serotonina (ISRS) e a terapia cognitivocomportamental com técnicas de exposição e prevenção de respostas não conseguem melhora satisfatória em até 40% dos pacientes. Para estes casos, existem evidências que apóiam o uso de antipsicóticos como a quetiapina, na potencialização dos ISRS. No entanto, os antipsicóticos são eficazes para apenas um terço dos pacientes e estão associados a eventos adversos preocupantes no longo prazo. Este estudo tem como objetivo comparar a eficácia da potencialização do ISRS fluoxetina com a clomipramina, um inibidor de recaptura da serotonina não-seletivo, ou quetiapina, versus placebo. Para inclusão neste estudo, os pacientes precisavam: relatar os sintomas de TOC como sendo seu problema principal; estar em uso da dose máxima tolerada ou recomendada de fluoxetina por pelo menos oito semanas; ter um escore total na escala Yale Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Scale (YBOCS) de pelo menos 16; e ter tido uma redução do escore inicial da YBOCS menor do que 35% após tratamento com fluoxetina. Os pacientes (N=54) foram alocados por meio de um método de minimização em três grupos: quetiapina (até 200mg/dia) com fluoxetina (até 40mg/dia) (QTP/FLX) (N=18); clomipramina (até 75mg/dia) com fluoxetina (até 40mg/dia) (CMI/FLX) (N=18); e placebo com dose máxima de fluoxetina (até 80mg/dia) (PLC/FLX) (N=18). Avaliadores cegos obtiveram os escores da YBOCS nas semanas 0 e 12. As análises foram realizadas por intenção de tratar, com imputação do tipo hot-deck para os dados faltantes. Teste de Wald por ANCOVA não paramétrico para medidas ordinais repetidas foi utilizado para avaliar efeitos de grupo, tempo e interação para os resultados da YBOCS e desfechos secundários, tendo as medidas iniciais como co-variáveis. Os resultados da impressão clínica global de melhora (ICG-M) foram utilizados para classificar os pacientes como respondedores ou não-respondedores. O teste qui-quadrado foi utilizado para avaliar a freqüência de respondedores em cada grupo. Foram feitos gráficos de percentis e análises de sensibilidade. Quarenta pacientes (74%) completaram o seguimento. Não foram observados efeitos adversos graves. Pacientes dos grupos PLC/FLX (YBOCS final: média=10, DP=4; redução em relação ao inicial: média=49%, DP=0.49) e CMI/FLX (YBOCS final: média=10, DP=4; redução em relação ao inicial: média=46%, DP=0.51) melhoraram significativamente e tiveram uma melhor resposta quando comparados aos do grupo QTP/FLX (YBOCS final: média=13, DP=3; redução em relação ao inicial: média=18%, DP=0.20; p=0.001). Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas para as medidas secundárias. Os gráficos de percentis confirmaram que os pacientes do grupo QTP/FLX pioraram com maior freqüência e melhoraram menos do que os pacientes dos outros dois grupos. Análises de sensibilidade demonstraram que outros métodos de análise não modificaram significativamente os resultados. Este é o primeiro estudo duplo-cego controlado de potencialização de ISRS com clomipramina em TOC e também o primeiro a comparar a eficácia de potencialização com quetiapina à de outro potencializador. Limitações deste estudo incluem o uso de doses baixas dos potencializadores, taxas de abandono diferentes para os três grupos e período curto de seguimento. Apesar dessas limitações, nossos resultados apóiam o uso da clomipramina como potencializador (principalmente para aqueles que não toleram doses altas de fluoxetina) e o aumento do período de seguimento com fluoxetina em dose máxima antes de uma potencialização medicamentosa ser tentada / Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) manifests often as a chronic illness and is characterized by the presence of obsessions and compulsions. Firstline treatment options, which include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and cognitive-behavior therapy with exposure and response prevention techniques, fail to achieve a satisfactory response in up to 40% of patients. Current evidence supports the augmentation of SSRI with antipsychotics, such as quetiapine. However, anti-psychotics are effective for only one-third of the patients and have been associated with severe long term side effects. This study aimed to compare clomipramine and quetiapine augmentation of the SSRI fluoxetine. Previously to the beginning of this trial all patients had to: report OCD as they primary diagnosis, be taking the highest tolerated or recommended dose of fluoxetine for at least eight weeks, have a current Yale Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) total of at least 16, and have had a reduction of less than 35% of the initial total YBOCS score with fluoxetine treatment. Fifty-four patients were allocated trough a minimization procedure in one of three arms: quetiapine (up to 200 mg/day) plus fluoxetine (up to 40 mg/day) (QTP/FLX) (N=18), clomipramine (up to 75 mg/day) plus fluoxetine (up to 40 mg/day) (CMI/FLX) (N=18) and 18 placebo plus sustained maximum dose fluoxetine (up to 80 mg/day) (PLC/FLX) (N=18). Blinded raters collected YBOCS scores at weeks 0 and 12. Analyses were made with intention-to-treat and hot-deck imputation of missing data. Wald statistics from non-parametric ANCOVA for ordinal categorical repeated measures were used to evaluate group, time and interaction effects for YBOCS scores and secondary outcome measures considering initial measures as covariates. Clinical Global Impression scores of improvement (CGI-I) were used to classify individuals in responders or non-responders. Chi-square was used to evaluate frequency of responders in each group. Percentile-plots were built and sensitivity analyses were performed. Completion rate was 74% (N=40). No severe adverse events occurred during the trial. Patients from the PLC/FLX (final YBOCS score: mean=10, SD=4; reduction from initial YBOCS score: mean=49%, SD=0.49) and CMI/FLX (final YBOCS score: mean=10, SD=4; reduction from initial YBOCS score: mean=46%, SD=0.51) groups improved significantly and also had a significantly better response than the ones from the QTP/FLX group (final YBOCS score: mean=13, SD=3; reduction from initial YBOCS score: mean=18%, SD=0.20; p=0.001). No significant differences were evident for secondary outcome measures. Percentile plots confirmed that patients in the QTP/FLX group got worse more often or improved less than in the other two groups. Sensitivity analyses showed that other analytical methods did not significantly change results. This is the first double-blind placebo-controlled trial of clomipramine augmentation and the first to compare quetiapine augmentation with another active augmenter. Limitations of our trial include the use of low dose of augmenters, differential drop-out rates for each treatment arm and short period of follow-up. Despite these limitations, our results support the use of clomipramine as an augmentation strategy (mainly for those who do not tolerate higher doses of fluoxetine) and the prorogation of the period of maximum dose of fluoxetine before an augmentation is tried

Contexte: À date, il existe peu de données sur l’adhésion, la persistance et les coûts associés aux antidépresseurs selon le type d’assurance médicament (privé ou public). Objectif: Comparer selon le régime d’assurance médicament (privé ou public), l'adhésion, la persistance et les coûts des antidépresseurs. Méthodes de recherche: Une étude de cohorte appariée a été réalisée en utilisant des bases de données du Québec. Sujets: Nous avons sélectionné 194 patients assurés par un régime privé et 1923 patients assurés par le régime public de la Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec (RAMQ) (18-64 ans) qui ont rempli au moins une ordonnance pour un antidépresseur entre décembre 2007 et septembre 2009. Mesures: L’adhésion, mesurée sur une période d’un an, a été estimée en utilisant le proportion of prescribed days covered (PPDC). Un modèle de régression linéaire a été utilisé afin d’estimer la différence moyenne en PPDC entre les patients assurés par un régime privé et ceux assurés par le régime public de la RAMQ. La persistance a été comparé entre ces deux groupes avec un modèle de régression de survie Cox, et le coût mensuel d'antidépresseurs ($ CAN) a été comparé entre ces deux groupes en utilisant un modèle de régression linéaire. Résultats: Le PPDC parmi les patients assurés par un régime privé était de 86,4% (intervalle de confiance (IC) 95%: 83,3%-89,5%) versus 81,3% (IC 95%: 80,1%-82,5%) pour les patients assurés par le régime public de la RAMQ, pour une différence moyenne ajustée de 6,7% (IC 95%: 3,0%-10,4%). La persistance après un an parmi les patients assurés par un régime privé était de 49,5% versus 18,9% pour les patients assurés par le régime public de la RAMQ (p <0,001), et le rapport de risque ajusté était de 0,48 (IC 95%: 0,30-0,76). Comparativement aux patients assurés par le régime public de la RAMQ, les patients ayant une assurance privée ont payé 14,94 $ CAD (95% CI: $12,30-$17,58) de plus par mois en moyenne pour leurs antidépresseurs. Conclusion: Les patients assurés par un régime privé avaient une meilleure adhésion, persistance, mais avaient aussi un plus haut coût pour leurs antidépresseurs que ceux assurés par le régime public de la RAMQ. Cette différence de coûts peut être due aux différentes exigences de paiement en pharmacie entre les deux régimes ainsi qu’aux limites des honoraires des pharmaciens imposés par le régime public. / Background: The influence of the type of drug insurance on adherence, persistence and cost of antidepressants is not well known. Objective: To compare adherence, persistence and cost of antidepressants in patients with private and public drug insurance. Research Design: A matched cohort study was conducted using prescription claims databases from Quebec, Canada. Subjects: 194 privately and 1923 publicly insured patients (18-64 years) who filled at least one prescription for an antidepressant between December 2007 and September 2009. Measures: Adherence over one year was estimated using the proportion of prescribed days covered (PPDC). The difference in mean PPDC between patients with private and public drug insurance was estimated with a linear regression model. Persistence was compared between the groups with a Cox regression model, and the monthly cost of antidepressants (CAD$) was compared between the two groups using linear regression. Results: The PPDC was 86.4% (95% CI: 83.3-89.5) in patients with private and 81.3% (95%CI: 80.1-82.5) in patients with public drug insurance and the adjusted mean difference was 6.7% (95% CI: 3.0-10.4). Persistence was 49.5% in patients with private and 18.9% in patients with public drug insurance at one year (p<0.001), and the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.48 (95%CI: 0.30-0.76). Patients privately insured paid 14.94$ CAD (95% CI: 12.30; 17.58) more per month on average for their antidepressants. Conclusion: Better adherence and persistence and higher costs were observed in privately insured patients. Cost difference might be due to different pharmacy payment requirements and pharmacists’ honorary restrictions under the public plan.

“Off-label use” is defined as the use of medicine for indications other than recommended or registered for, e.g. the prescribing of a particular active substance for a patient younger than the substance is recommended or indicated for, or different formulations or dosages of a substance (Ekins-Daukes et al., 2004:349; Stedman’s medical dictionary, 2006). Off-label prescribing is common, and fluctuates by physician, patient and drug (Eguale et al., 2012:781). Drug classes most commonly prescribed off-label include anti-asthmatic, cardiovascular drugs and antidepressants. Lee et al. (2012:140) found that 9 out of 10 antidepressants prescribed were associated with unapproved usage of antidepressants. An antidepressant can be defined as a substance that prevents or relieves depression or depressive episodes (Mosby, 2009:115). There is paucity of information on the off-label prescribing practices of antidepressants in the South African private health sector. According to Eguale et al. (2012:781), the paucity of information on off-label prescribing practices may be, in part, ascribed to the difficulty in the establishment of reasons for treatment. The objective of this study was to determine the prescribing patterns of antidepressants as well as to identify off-label prescribing of antidepressants among adults in a section of the private health sector of South Africa by using a medicine claims database. A quantitative and observational, descriptive cross-sectional design was followed in this study. Data for a period of a year, from January to December 2010 were obtained for analysis. The data set consisted of medicine claims for a total number of 1 220 289 patients, containing a total of 8 515 428 prescriptions and 20 527 777 medicine items. The study population (patients receiving antidepressants 18 years and older) accounted for 14.8% (n = 1 220 289) of the total data set. The average age of patients receiving antidepressants was 56.1 ± 16.6 (median = 56.2) (Inter quartile range = 43.3–68.1). Results of the study showed that antidepressant prescriptions accounted for 8.3% (n = 8 515 428) of all prescriptions claimed during 2010. A total 3.5 % (n = 20 527 777) of antidepressants were claimed during the study period. Using the DU90% method it was established that the majority of antidepressant medicine items were prescribed by general practitioners (i.e. 75.7%, n = 702 285) and psychiatrists (14.9%, n = 702 285). Almost 72% (n = 702 885) of antidepressant medicine items claimed for the study population were for women. The most prescribed antidepressants (based on the DU90%) were amitriptyline (20.6%, n = 702 885), citalopram (19.2%), escitalopram (14.6%), fluoxetine (11.7%), venlafaxine (5.7%), paroxetine (5.2%), duloxetine (4.4%), sertraline (3.8%), bupropion (3.1%) and mirtazapine (2.6%). Amitriptyline accounted for 82.4% of off-label prescriptions (n = 2 635), whereas escitalopram and fluoxetine accounted for 4.2% and 3.8%, respectively. The tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) were mostly prescribed off-label for migraine, headache and sleep disorders. The off-label prescribing of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) included menopause, schizophrenia and headache. The off-label indicated prescriptions of the serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were mostly for schizophrenia and other anxiety disorders. Mirtazapine, a serotonin modulator/tetracyclic antidepressant, was mostly prescribed off-label for anxiety disorders. Off-label prescriptions for bupropion, a noradrenaline and dopamine re-uptake inhibitor mainly included other anxiety disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Furthermore, the prescribed daily dose (PDD) of each active antidepressant for all off-label indications was determined. In conclusion: This study investigated the off-label prescribing patterns of antidepressants among adults a section of the private health sector of a South Africa, using a large medicine claims database. Recommendations for future research were made. / MPham (Pharmacy Practice), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / Depression is a serious, recurrent and incapacitating psychiatric condition with a heavy social burden. The pharmacological approach to this disorder employs therapy with antidepressant drugs, which have side effects and numerous limitations. In view of the promising pharmacological properties of containing-selenium molecules, this study evaluated the effect of 3-(4-fluorophenylselenyl)-2,5-diphenylselenophene (DPS) in the mouse forced swim test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST), two models predictive of depressant activity. Since serotonin (5-HT) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of depressive disorders, the involvement of serotonergic system and 5-HT receptors in the action caused by DPS was studied. The antidepressant-like action of combined treatment with subeffective doses of both DPS plus paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) was investigated. Further, we verified the possible mechanism responsible for antidepressant-like action of DPS. The results showed that DPS (50 and 100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly reduced the immobility time during the FST and TST, without accompanying changes in ambulation when assessed in the open-field test. The anti-immobility effect of DPS (50 mg/kg, i.g.) in the FST was prevented by pretreatment of mice with pCPA (p-chlorophenylalanine; an inhibitor of 5-HT synthesis, 100 mg/kg, i.p., once a day for 4 consecutive days,), WAY 100635 (N-[2- [4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinylcyclohexane carboxamide; 0.1 mg/kg, s.c., a selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist), ritanserin (1 mg/kg, i.p., a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist) or ondansetron (1 mg/kg, i.p., a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist). Combined treatment with paroxetine and DPS reduced the immobility time in the FST. DPS at the dose of 50 mg/kg did not produce any change in the cerebral activity of monoamine oxidase subtypes (MAO-A or MAO-B). DPS at the dose of 50 mg/kg inhibited significantly 5-HT uptake in mouse brain synaptosomes. These results suggest that DPS produced an antidepressant-like action in the mouse FST and TST and this action seems most likely to be mediated through an interaction with serotonergic system, particularly by 5-HT reuptake inhibition. / A depressão é uma doença grave, recorrente e uma condição psiquiátrica incapacitante que gera pesados custos sociais. A abordagem farmacológica dessa desordem é feita por meio do emprego de antidepressivos, os quais apresentam efeitos adversos e numerosas limitações. Tendo em vista as promissoras propriedades farmacológicas das moléculas contendo selênio, este estudo avaliou o efeito do 3-(4-fluorofenilselenil)-2,5-difenilselenofeno (DPS) no teste do nado forçado (TNF) e no teste da suspensão da cauda (TSC) em camundongos, dois modelos preditivos de comportamento depressivo. Uma vez que a serotonina (5-HT) desempenha um importante papel na patofisiologia dos transtornos depressivos, o envolvimento do sistema serotoninérgico e dos receptores de 5-HT na ação desenvolvida pelo DPS foi estudado. A ação do tipo antidepressiva do tratamento combinado com doses subefetivas de DPS e paroxetina, um inibidor seletivo da recaptação de serotonina (ISRS) foi investigada. Além disso, o possível mecanismo responsável pela ação do tipo antidepressiva do DPS também foi verificado. Os resultados mostram que o DPS (50 e 100 mg/kg) reduziu significativamente o tempo de imobilidade durante os TSC e TNF, sem causar alterações na atividade locomotora no teste do campo aberto (TCA). O efeito anti-imobilidade do DPS (50 mg/kg, i.g.) no TNF foi prevenido pelo pré-tratamento dos animais com pCPA (p-clorofenilalanina; 100 mg/kg, i.p., administrado uma vez ao dia durante 4 dias consecutivos, um inibidor da síntese de serotonina), WAY 100635 (N-[2-[4-(2-metoxifenil)-1-piperazinil]etil]-N-2- piridinilciclohexano carboxamida; 0,1 mg/kg, s.c., um antagonista seletivo de receptores 5- HT1A), ritanserina (1 mg/kg, i.p., um antagonista seletivo de receptores 5-HT2) ou ondansetrona (1 mg/kg, i.p., um antagonista seletivo de receptores 5-HT3). O tratamento combinado com paroxetina e DPS reduziu o tempo de imobilidade no TNF. O DPS na dose de 50 mg/kg não produziu nenhuma alteração na atividade dos subtipos da monoamino oxidase (MAO-A e MAO-B) cerebral. O DPS na dose de 50 mg/kg inibiu significantemente a captação de 5-HT em sinaptossoma de cérebro de camundongos. Esses resultados sugerem que o DPS produziu uma ação do tipo antidepressiva no TSC e no TNF em camundongos e esta ação parece ser mediada por uma interação com o sistema serotoninérgico, particularmente por uma inibição da recaptação de 5-HT.

The objective was to examine duloxetine 60–120mg/day treatment for relapse prevention in adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Adult patients (N=887; mean age=43.3 years; 61.0% female) with DSM-IV-TR-defined GAD diagnosis were treated with duloxetine for 26 weeks. Patients who completed open-label phase and were treatment responders (≥50% reduction in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score to ≤11 and “much”/“very much improved” ratings for the last 2 visits of open-label phase) were randomly assigned to receive duloxetine or placebo for a 26-week double-blind continuation phase. Relapse was defined as ≥2-point increase in illness severity ratings or by discontinuation due to lack of efficacy. During the double-blind phase, placebo-treated patients (N=201) relapsed more frequently (41.8%) than duloxetine-treated patients (13.7%, N=204, P≤0.001) and worsened on each outcome measure (P≤0.001, all comparisons). Duloxetine 60–120 mg/day treatment was efficacious and reduced risk of relapse in patients with GAD.

No description available.

Los trastornos emocionales de tipo depresivo y la ansiedad son las formas más prevalentes de enfermedad mental y suponen un serio problema de salud en la sociedad occidental. Recientemente, se ha postulado que el sistema endocannabinoide pueda ser un importante sustrato en el desarrollo de estos trastornos dada su participación en el control de las emociones. Nuestros resultados demuestran que los animales carentes del receptor cannabinoide CB1 manifiestan un fenotipo de tipo depresivo asociado a una deficiencia del factor neurotrófico BDNF en el hipocampo, que podría estar causada por los elevados niveles de glucocorticoides liberados en respuesta al estrés en estos mutantes. Por otra parte, el sistema endocannabinoide participa en los efectos inducidos por la nicotina sobre la ansiedad y en la expresión del síndrome de abstinencia de esta droga. Así, la actividad del receptor CB1 alivia los efectos ansiogénicos de dosis elevadas de nicotina y facilita los efectos ansiolíticos de dosis bajas. Además, la administración del agonista cannabinoide &#61508;9-THC atenúa las manifestaciones somáticas y emocionales negativas de la abstinencia de nicotina. En general, considerando los resultados presentados en esta Tesis Doctoral, podemos afirmar que el receptor CB1 participa de forma determinante en la recuperación del balance homeostático del organismo tras la exposición a un estímulo emocional negativo, bien sea una situación estresante aguda o sostenida, o bien una droga que incrementa los niveles de ansiedad o cuya retirada produce abstinencia. / Mood disorders such as depression and anxiety are the most common mental diseases and they suppose a serious health problem in our society. Recently, endocannabinoid system has been postulated to be an important substrate in the development of such disorders taking into account the role exerted by this neuromodulatory system in mood and emotions. Our results demonstrate that CB1 knockout mice exhibit a depressive-like phenotype associated to a deficiency in the neurotrophic factor BDNF in the hippocampus, which could be a consequence of the increased glucocorticoid release in response to stress exposure. On the other hand, the endocannabinoid system participates in nicotine induced effects on anxiety and in the expression of nicotine withdrawal. Thus, CB1 receptor activity attenuates anxiogenic-like effects and facilitates anxiolytic-like responses induced by high or low doses of nicotine, respectively. Moreover, &#61508;9-THC administration ameliorates somatic and negative motivational signs of nicotine withdrawal. In summary, the results presented in this Doctoral Thesis indicate that CB1 receptor participates in the recovery of the homeostatic balance after the exposure to negative emotional stimuli, either acute or sustained stress or a drug which induced anxiety-like effects or withdrawal signs after the end of the exposure.

Text in English / Pharmacological treatment is often required in the management of psychiatric disorders. Non-adherence to medication represents a significant health concern that prevents patients from fully benefitting from their treatment, and can lead to negative consequences for individuals, their families and the healthcare system. The adherence rates to antidepressant medications in a sample of psychiatric outpatients in the Johannesburg Metropolitan district of Gauteng Province were examined. A descriptive survey method was employed to systematically collect data from n=377 patients using a structured, non-clinical questionnaire and the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Questionnaire. Variables were analysed using descriptive and correlational statistical methods. Antidepressant adherence rates were reported as 47.7% (low), 31.3% (medium) and 21% (high). These high rates represent a concern in antidepressant treatment, and health care practitioners and health systems must take this into consideration when planning and developing interventions to improve adherence in this area. The current study found significant correlations between antidepressant adherence rates and some medication-, health system- and moderating variables. Based on these findings, interventions that provide appropriate health-related education about treatment and improved social support systems may be effective in addressing antidepressant non-adherence in psychiatric outpatients in this region. / Psychology / M. Soc.Sc. (Psychology)