以TRIZ為架構的創意之策略推展於台灣高科技公司 / High-tech industry in Taiwan is the mainstream of economic growth. In recent years, international patent litigation news often hear, business at the same time against opponents in the competition through patent to protect themselves, and then rely on patents for high added value. Using innovative methods to solve problems faced by enterprise innovation process is commonly used in the practice of foreign companies. Technology companies encourage employees to obtain patents; however, although engineering also hope to increase patent contribution, but often do not know how to proceed efficiently. TRIZ theory provides an innovative management system that lets innovation becomes simple, no longer out of reach. Currently the Western developed countries such as the United States, Germany, Britain, France, Sweden and Russia, Japan and other countries, no matter theoretical and application research or technical research of TRIZ are at the forefront of the world. Due to geographical proximity relations with Russia, South Korea and China are also very positive learning TRIZ. In Taiwan, TRIZ is rarely been widely introduced in the country and in enterprise. TRIZ so good, why not spread in the Taiwan? Paper discusses the cost of imported TRIZ, the implementation procedure, and the expected results through literature and actual interviews. Based on these introduction to manager understand the perspective of the feasibility of local enterprises import TRIZ and proposed how to make TRIZ popularity in domestic. Keywords: High-tech, TRIZ, Creativity, Innovation

導熱介面材料(Thermal Interface Materials, TIM)是所有電子相關產品不可或缺的組成元素之一，沒有了它，市面上就不會有電腦、遊戲機、智慧型手機，也不會有電視機、LED燈，更不會有油電混合車；既然如此不可或缺，但它卻又不造就了是電子產業慣例定義中的關鍵零組件。如此特殊的屬性與定位，導熱介面材料的不凡與平凡。 台灣廠商高柏科技過去十年，趁著消費性電子產品的興起，投入導熱介面材料的生產與銷售，並且堅持自行研發產品，十年間已見規模。但是由於小廠迅速冒出，削價競爭，殺戮慘烈，平凡的低階產品市場已成紅海。有鑑於全球總體的大趨勢，節能減碳需求與日俱增，導熱、散熱等熱管理產業已然成為下一波的主流市場，高柏科技是否可再一次順應潮流，再創另一個豐收的十年，全球競爭力的提高將是成敗關鍵。 高柏科技於是亟思運用既有核心競爭優勢，輔以積極開闢海外市場，希望以全球佈局的高度，以敏銳的市場洞察力，察覺導熱介面材料下一個世代的產品應用之星，找到一片屬於導熱介面材料的不凡的深湛藍海。 / Thermal Interface Materials (TIM) is one of key components in many electronics applications. TIM generally works to solve thermal issues in these electronic products. T-Global Technology Co., one of the top 15 leading companies in the global TIM industry, has been building its own brand by manufacturing and marketing it own products since 10 years ago. The company faces much higher competitions from producers of emerging markets who focus on the low-cost or entry-lever productions. This study considers and investigates how to develop sustainable growth strategies in the current situation. A thorough analysis suggests that strategies of deeper penetrating and expanding into global markets by leveraging the company's core competence may well serve the purpose.

This business plan aims at a start-up company (“EGG”) which specializes in building an online creative platform for designer and artist, as well as providing customized & personalized products. EGG is created by a group of friends, the company’s founding members. These products include LIFE-T (T-Shirt) and LIFE-CASE (Smartphone Case) with self-designed product with fashionable components. All EGG’s products are designed and implemented by our talent engineering team to fit current customers’ needs. We plan to target young students and working professionals who are particularly pursuing fashionable & customized merchandise experience at a reasonable price. Our products cater for that need and provide excellent concept and packaging to suit their needs. This provided a very good opportunity for niche personalized product brand makers such as EGG to take advantage. We uses online to offline (“O2O”) channel to market and distribute our products because they serve the need of both low in cost and high efficiency in reaching our target customers. They can receive the latest news or coupons on our website and experience in the physical store. After evaluating our product strength and weakness, we decided on a sales and implementation strategy for younger generation and forecasted our financial performance for the next five years. Finally, we expect this venture to turn profitable in the second year and generate meaning return for our shareholders. Thus this is a venture worth taking and investing upon.

本研究以台灣8家生物科技公司為研究對象，探討公司於民國85年到88年之間的經營效率評估，比較孰優孰劣。本研究應用資料包絡分析法(data envelopment analysis, DEA)來計算相對效率值。投入要素包括：資本額、研發支出、員工人數，及員工素質共四項；產出項目則為公司營業額一項。研究中分別求解CCR效率和A&P效率，此外，亦將CCR效率進一步區分為純粹技術效率(BCC效率)與規模效率，除了效率值比較和衍生的相關討論外，還進行規模報酬分析、虛擬乘數分析、差額變數分析，與敏感度分析，最後則是獲利能力與經營效率之比較。 研究結果顯示，效率排名以杏輝表現最佳，其次依序為濟生、葡萄王、永日、永信、生達、中化、五鼎；依年度區分的平均效率值分析，可觀察到的共通現象，皆是從民國85年一路衰退到88年，顯示八家生技公司的營運效率在此期間總體表現不佳。整體來看，投入項目需縮減幅度最大者為員工素質，資本額次之。表示八家生技公司在此期間高素質人力的投入，並無產生相當的營收，原因可能是公司開發的產品未能符合市場的需求，因此，未來在開發新產品方面應加強結合行銷功能，才能充分滿足消費者或客戶的需求。此外，資本額投入過多，造成資源的浪費，也需要公司管理者加強成本的控管，以期達到資源有效分配。從獲利能力與經營效率之比較分析得知，經營效率高的公司大多獲利能力亦較高。 / Utilizing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), this paper examines the relative efficiency of 8 companies over a period of 4 years in Taiwan biotech industry. The study has indicated how to use DEA to identify individual companies that are less efficient than other comparable units of output factors relative to input factors. These DEA models basing on the data of 1996-1999 provide CCR efficiency, and A&P efficiency. Furthermore, CCR efficiency is divided into pure technical efficiency (BCC efficiency) and scale efficiency. Besides the comparison of these efficiencies and the discussion about related content, the present study also performs scale analysis, multiplier analysis, slack analysis, and sensitivity analysis. Finally, the comparison of profitability and operating efficiency is conducted. The research shows that Sinphar Pharm. Corp. is ranked first in efficiency, and then Chi Sheng Chemical Corp., Grape King Corp., Yung Zip Chemical Corp., Yung Shin Pharm. Corp., Standard Chemical & Pharm. Corp., China Chemical & Pharm. Corp., and Apex Biotech Corp. in order. Average efficiency of these eight companies declined from 1996 to 1999. As a whole, the personnel Ability and Capital should be the first two input item that needs to be reduced. The comparison of profitability and operating efficiency indicates that most efficient companies can have good profitability.

本研究之主旨在探討一般新創公司在創業前期及創業後期所面臨的經營管理問題與對策，給有心創業者作為參考，以降低失敗的風險，進而能一舉成功，避免傷及創業之鬥志與勇氣，減少財務的損失。 首先藉由文獻的整理，蒐集專家及學者之菁華，找出與創業有關的學理，再將學理套於個案公司之經營管理，深入暸解創業成敗之關鍵因素，從實務中發掘學理之依據，進而整理出成功的創業模式，得以印證學理之正確性，讓有志於創業者加強對文獻之信心與認同。 本研究之個案雖屬高科技公司，但經過學理之印證後，可發現其經營管理之方法也離不開文獻之範疇，主要是採用Timmons及 Shane之創業模式來加以剖析，雖然研究者將Timmons之模式運用於創業前期，而將Shane之模式運用於創業後期，或許有些牽強，但目的是為了方便敘述，好讓讀者容易理解。 針對本研究之主要問題可區分為下列兩期，將籌備到創業後三年歸納為創業前期，第四到十五年則歸納為創業後期，雖然期間有點太長，但經營者自認為規模還小，仍應秉著創業期之衝勁追求更完美： 一、 新創公司創業前期的管理作法為何? 二、 新創公司創業後期的管理作法為何? 從本研究中可獲得以下之主要結論: 一、 新創公司在創業前期會善用其核心能耐以尋找商機，同時以外部資源取用補足內部資源及能力之不足，並加強創業團隊成員之專長互補與共識，提高創業成功的機會。 二、 新創公司在創業後期之技術管理上會著重利基性及差異性之思維，在行銷管理上會以客戶需求為導向，在組織管理上則會特別重視風險管理並適時網羅人才以增強組織的陣容，並以創新來提高報酬。 / The newly start-up company will face the different management difficulties during the starting period. The study distinguished the start-up period into Earlier Period of the Start-up and the Later Period of the Start-up. The selecting company of the thesis is classified as the high-tech industry. We use the Timmons Model to analyze the Earlier Period of the Start-up, and use the Model of Scott A. Shane to analyze the Later Period of the Start-up. The main research questions of the thesis are : 1. What’s the right management method in the Earlier Period of the Start-up Company? 2. What’s the right management method in the Later Period of the Start-up Company? The conclusions of the research are： 1. In the Earlier Period, the company must (1) make a good use of its core competency to catch the good chance, (2) use the external resources to strengthen the lack of the internal resources or capability, (3) strengthen and increases the complementarity of the abilities of the start-up entrepreneurial team. 2. In the Later Period, the company must (1) focus on the niche market and attach importance to the differentiation on the Technology Management issue, (2) take the customer demand-oriented method as the principal on the Marketing Management issue, (3) pay attention to the risk management, recruit the talented person or team on the Organizational Management issue.

我國關係人交易普遍且具重要性，而過去研究顯示關係人交易會對公司產生負面效果，且關係人交易之查核具有困難度，因此本研究以關係人交易較多且查核風險較高之高科技公司為研究對象，將關係人交易分為關係人銷貨交易、關係人進貨交易、關係人應收款與關係人應付款等四項類別，探討關係人交易與審計品質的關係。進一步探討當關係人交易分為發行公司與關係人皆受相同會計師查核與受不同會計師查核兩類型，對發行公司財務報表審計品質的影響。實證結果發現：關係人銷貨交易、關係人進貨交易與審計品質呈負向關係；關係人銷貨交易、關係人進貨交易與關係人應收款兩造受不同會計師查核者，對其發行公司財務報表審計品質之負面影響較兩造受相同會計師查核者強。 / Related party transactions are common and important in Taiwan, and empirical studies in Taiwan show that related party transactions have negative impact on earnings management and company performance. Based on auditing standards and literature, related party transactions are difficult to audit, and high technology firms have more related party transactions which may result in higher audit risk than other industry. Therefore, we investigate the association between related party transactions (including sales to related parties, purchases from related parties, accounts receivable from related parties and payable to related parties) and audit quality (proxied by accrual quality) in high technology firms, and find that sales to related parties and purchases from related parties have negative impact on audit quality. Next, we investigate the impact of related party transactions audited by the same auditor or different auditors. Empirical results show that sales to related parties, purchases from related parties and accounts receivable from related parties audited by different auditors show stronger negative impacts on audit quality than those audited by same auditors.

本篇論文主要探討新創科技公司產品創新分工網路之現況與績效，新創科技公司之兩大核心資源為創新與技術。公司成長與獲利通常來自技術商品化之價值，一般而言公司很少可完全依賴內部資源進行獨立創新。創新社群以技術為核心，社群中的組織必須顯著地參與一項新技術的商品化工作，主要辨認指標是垂直互補性資產與資訊流通。產業分工網路是企業內部組織和企業彼此間的結合型態，用以產生附加價值，其價值鏈活動是透過良好的協調以造成差異化或成本降低。資訊科技是改變價值活動的執行方式及價值鏈活動中各種連結的性質，影響競爭範圍並塑造新產品。 本研究以國內研發新產品或技術之新創科技公司為研究對象，以個案方式運用分析模式將企業之內外在因素、SWOT及產業能力作深入分析，並訪談中小企業實證研究分工網路活動，探索新創科技公司產品創新分工網路之現況以及產業系統(研究/製造)供應鏈績效，研究結果發現： 1、台灣產業仍屬於「不完全的概念設計與試製生產分離型」分工網路。新創科技公司之產品普遍缺乏品牌形象，且因資源缺乏，無法以全球市場為行銷對象，在設備上的投資、產品與製造的選擇上沒有自主性，限制台灣人才的創新能力及新創科技公司之成功。 2、新創科技公司在產品創新上提昇產品之附加價值，製程上依賴中小企業的「專業分工」及「彈性互補」，充分利用體系資源，調整出最佳效率。但在成熟市場中，採取追隨者的競爭腳步以及成本領導策略，因此無法將產品附加價值回饋於產業分工體系。 3、台灣中小企業普遍在資訊化方面嚴重落後，無法在新的且分散化的產業分工中，以虛擬、組織模組化的分工原理運作，因此人工成本優勢喪失後，其「彈性」、「快速」的核心競爭能力亦在衰退中。 4、中小企業與新創科技公司因價值鏈之市場顧客面不完整，以供應鏈管理觀點檢討發現：管理方法、產品流程、風險與獲利架構、文化與態度觀念、變革升級等構面皆尚待加強。 / I his thesis is mainly in finding out the reality and performance on the network in division of labor for product innovation of a technology startup company. The two core resources of a technology startup company are innovation and techniques. The growth and earning of such company normally come from the value of technology commercialization. Generally, such company could hardly rely on its internal resources completely for independent innovation. Innovative community centers on techniques and the community organization must involve in the commercialization of a new technique significantly, and the main identifying indicator is the vertical complementary assets and the information flow. Industrial network in division of labor is the connecting pattern of the international organization of a business entity with other business, which is for creating added value. The value chain activities are made through sound coordination to generate differentiation and cost-down.Information technology is for changing the performing manner value activities,as well as the natures of connection among various chain activities. It serves to affect the scope of competition and to form new products. This research targeted at the technology startup companies involved in the research and development of new products or new techniques, and case study approach is employed to analyze the internal and external factors of a company,SWOT and industrial capacity with analytical modes. Face to face interview with medium and small enterprises were conducted to empirically demonstrate the activities of the network in division of labor, and to investigate the reality and industrial system (research / manufacturing) supply chain performance of new innovative network in division of labor. The findings are: 1.Industries in Taiwan are still in the stage of“Incomplete Conceptual Design and Pilot Production Separated Network in Division of Labor”level.Technology startup companies are generally lack of brand image. And, with the lack of resources, they are unable to target at the global market for marketing. There is less autonomy in the investment in equipment and options of products and manufacturing. These have limited the talents in Taiwan in their innovation capability and the success of technology startup companies. 2.The technology startup companies promote the added value of their innovative products, and in manufacturing, they rely on the specialization and flexible complement of medium and small enterprise to adjust to the best efficiency by fully utilize the system resources. However, in a matured market, they adopted the follower approach and cost-lead strategies, that they could not feed back the added value of products to the system in division of labor. 3.Generally the medium and small enterprises are having serious information gap, that they are unable to employ the diversification principle in the new and spread-over industrial diversification with virtual, organization modular.Therefore, after losing the labor cost advantage, the core competitiveness in flexibility and speed are also in their way down. 4.Medium and small enterprise, and the technology startup companies have the short of incomplete customer dimension in their value chain, it is found,in the view point of supply chain management, they need to strengthen and improve their managerial approach, product flow, risk and profit structure,culture and attitude and changes and upgrading. Subject Terms (Key Word)： - technology startup company - technology commercialization - network in division of labor - innovation community - value chain - supply chain management

新經濟體系的來臨，以技術為基礎的新創科技公司如雨後春筍般的出現，這些新創科技公司的價值已非過去龐大的有形資產，取而代之的是無形資產，如專利權、商標權、著作權、授權契約或公司的研發團隊等，然而傳統的財務報表係儘反映公司過去的財務狀況和經營成果，對於自行研發而非外購的智慧財產權，卻無法認列在財務報表上，使得公司的價值被嚴重低估，有潛力的公司無法獲得所需資金而功敗垂成，十分可惜。 本研究係以實際經營管理的觀點切入，探討以智慧財產權做為融資擔保標的時所會遭遇到的困難為何？再經由所得知的實際困難找出智慧財產權融資所需營運機制和可行之營運模式。 由於智慧財產權融資大部份的風險都處於資金供給方，因此融資可行與否大致上都決定於資金供給者必須在那些條件具備的情況下才願意接受以智慧財產權做擔保的融資模式，因此本研究主要探討的問題從資金供給者的角度出發，主要研究的資金供給對象為國內銀行和創業投資公司。 透過次級文獻蒐集、集體焦點訪談、個別訪談和郵寄問卷等方法得到主要發現如下： 一、國外智慧財產權融資尚在起步階段，且西方國家與東方國家有關智慧財產權的營運模式皆不盡相同。 二、國內缺乏智慧財產權融資實際個案，雖然有關智慧財產權融資擔保有其基本法源可茲適用，但相關配套法規欠缺。 三、國內創業投資公司多以整體性評估新創科技公司，除少數新創科技公司（如生物科技公司）外，智慧財產並非單一關鍵性考量因素。 四、智慧財產權融資模式對創業投資公司有其間接性影響，其中有關鑑價機制和技術交易市場為創業投資公司所關切重點。 五、國內傳統銀行以利差為主要獲利來源之營運特性使智慧財產權融資高風險之融資形式不易為銀行所接受。 六、銀行本身缺乏智慧財產權鑑價能力和管理能力，此為銀行承做智慧財產權融資首要解決之務。 七、銀行傾向以政府保證的方式來進行智慧財產權融資，以降低本身所承擔風險。 八、以目前整體的環境而言，智慧財產權融資在智慧財產權觀念上、鑑價機制、管理能力、交易市場和法令規範等方面有著許多實行上的困難有待解決。 由以上可知智慧財產權融資以目前各方面的環境而言具有高風險性，其可行性的營運模式建議分為短期和長期來看： 一、初期營運模式： 1、初期政府可用保證基金的形式來分散資金供給者的風險。 2、初期可先透過國外的鑑價機制和交易市場來進行。 二、遠期營運模式： 建立具有國際化的鑑價機構和交易市場，根據「契約自由化」原則，只要交易雙方對於契約內容達成一致性的決議，則交易即可完成，以促進自由市場高流動性的運作。 關鍵字：智慧財產權融資、新創科技公司、創業投資公司、銀行、鑑價機制、技術交易市場、信用保證基金、關鍵要素。 / By the coming of the new economy, high-tech start-ups are mushrooming like bamboo shoots after a spring rain. The value of high-tech start-ups does not base on hard assets, but of their principal assets. The principal assets contain both the intangible assets and intellectual property right (IPR), such as patent, trademark, copyright, license contract as well as R&D team. However, traditional financial statements record only the past financial profile and operating results of companies. They've invested large amount of money on R&D, and therefore, to obtain the IPR. But the right obtained can not be shown on the financial statements. As a result, a large number of high-tech start-ups are underestimated, and unfortunately, most of the potential high-tech start-ups were not able to survive due to the inability to find the fund needed. From the view of the practical operating management, this study discusses problems that should be confronted when operating the financing IPR. Moreover, according to the problems found, the study anticipates by offering the operating mechanism and feasible business models for financing IPR. As we know, the majority of risk lies in the fund suppliers when financing IPR, so mostly the feasibility of financing IPR depends on fund suppliers that will receive IPR as collateral under a certain number requirements possessed. Thus, the study will then offer suggestions mainly in terms of fund suppliers, and the focus will be on domestic banks and venture capitalists. Based on the literature review, group focus interview, individuall interview, posted survey and so on are conducted for the study. Some of insights are derived as bellow: 1. For overseas countries, the financing IPR is just at the beginning period. There are differences in the business models of financing IPR between western countries and eastern countries. 2. There are few real cases about financing IPR in Taiwan although there are some basic laws to apply for financing IPR. Nevertheless, more related regulations are needed. 3. Most of the venture capitalists evaluate high-tech start-ups in an overall way. Hence, excluding a small numbers of high-tech start-ups such as bio-tech companies, IPR is not the only key evaluation factor. 4. The model of financing IPR has an indirect influence to venture capitalists. They emphasize more on the valuation mechanism and the technology marketplace. 5. The profit of traditional banks in Taiwan comes from the interest. From the conservative operating system, these banks are hard to accept the financing IPR that is with high risk. 6. The domestic banks are in short of the IPR valuation and IPR management capabilities. Thus, these problems should first be solved, and then the financing IPR will be able to be taken into action. 7. The domestic banks are in favor of reducing risk by getting guarantee from the government. 8. In terms of the whole financial environment in Taiwan, there are lots of difficulties in the concepts of IPR, valuation mechanism, management capability, technology marketplace, laws and decrees and so forth to be confronted. Above all, financing IPR has high risk in Taiwan at the moment. Therefore, this paper recommends that feasible business models of financing IPR should be divided as follow: 1. Short-run business model: (1) Diversify the risk of the fund suppliers from the guarantee fund offered by the government. (2) Finance IPR by foreign valuation mechanism and technology marketplace. 2. Long-run business model: First, more efforts should be put to set up our own international valuation institutions and technology marketplace. Second, the financing IPR should be taken by contract liberalization principle in compliance with the mechanism of the free market. When both sides agree to the contract, then the deal will be done. By doing so,the IPR financing will be highly promoted at the same time. Key words: Financing IPR, High-tech Start-ups, Venture Capitalists, Domestic Banks, Valuation Mechanism, Technology Marketplace, Credit Guarantee Fund, Key factors.

本研究以策略管理理論「策略形態分析」法與「策略矩陣分析」法為基礎，發展出新的分析架構–「價值單元展開分析」法，並與策略矩陣整合成為策略系統模型。藉由個案研究，驗證此策略系統模型如何使管理者能更精確地衡量未來策略規劃之選擇，最佳化公司未來競爭策略方向。 筆者以個案探討新創科技公司在持續變動與競爭之產業中，競爭策略分析與規劃之方法。以3D感測產業作為分析與研究之個案產業，並以其中一新創科技公司–L科技公司作為個案探討之對象，提出一以新創科技公司為出發點，在衡量現有與發展未來競爭策略時，可供利用與權衡的分析方法。 「價值單元展開分析」法追尋理性與系統化思考，為公司導入嚴謹明確、量化、及標準化的度量衡工具，使公司得以更加周詳完備與深入地分析其條件前提，將策略最佳化。且此架構具高度延展性，得充分配合公司進行各種思考面向之分析。此外，「價值單元展開分析」法亦可完全結合與相容於「策略矩陣分析」法之中，形成易於溝通與同步的策略系統模型，利用此特點解決公司在策略規劃時可能遭遇之混沌與困難，將效率、效益、及效能用在得當之處，使公司未來發展更符合目標。 / This study investigates the methods of analyzing and planning competitive strategies, with a case study of a technology startup company – “L Company” in the 3D sensor industry. Based on strategy analysis and Strategic Matrix Analysis, this study developed a new analytic framework – “Value Unit Expansion Analysis” which is a systematic model integrated into Strategic Matrix Analysis. By verifying the systematic model through the case, this study proposed a more precise and optimization–capable method to form a company’s future competitive strategies. Value Unit Expansion Analysis is a clarifying, quantifying, and standardizing method for the company to pave the path for factor condition analysis and strategic optimization. The structure was designed with a high flexibility in correspondence to different considerations and changing aspects; it is compatible and can be built within Strategic Matrix Analysis. The systematic model is liable for communication and synchronization during the process of strategy planning and, therefore, setting higher efficiency, benefit, and utility for pertinent strategies that fit into companies’ goals.

本研究之目的在探索國內科技產業的發展過程中，科技公司創業及經營的過程裡，創投公司對科技公司之知識互動關係，探討創投公司在科技公司各經營階段所扮演的角色及功能，創投公司可以提供科技公司之附加價值，影響創投事業與科技公司知識互動之因素，以及創投公司對科技創新之影響。 　　創投公司與科技公司知識互動成功之因素，在於科技公司之知識及資源的需求，以及創投公司所具有之條件，依據上述個案分析發現，其主要關鍵因素如下： 　　1.創投公司之資金為科技公司迫切需要之財務外援。 　　2.經營團隊對資金募集陌生或沒信心。 　　3.認同創投公司之專業能力。 　　4.經營團隊缺乏專業經營管理經驗，對外部知識之依賴度高。 　　5.對創投公司之組織網絡資源（上游零組件材料、下游客戶、策略投資人、新技術來源等）依賴度高。 　　6.產業之成熟度低且變動幅度大，產業前景不明，經營團隊對外部知識之依賴度高。 　　7.企業轉型方向未定，對新產業不熟悉，需要創投公司協助。 　　8.科技公司與創投團隊彼此有深厚的互信基礎。 　　9.科技公司之經營團隊對投資環境陌生。 　　10.創投團隊具有協助科技公司企業重整成功的經驗。 　　11.創投公司掌握科技公司具影響力的股權及決策權。 　　12.創投公司瞭解新市場趨勢。 　　本研究分析歸納之研究發現如下： 　　一、創業經營互動構面 　　【研究發現一】：科技公司的種子期及創建期，創投公司扮演催生者及創業智囊的角色。 　　【研究發現二】：科技公司的成長期及擴張期，創投公司扮演資源提供者與仲介者的角色。 　　【研究發現三】：科技公司的成熟期，創投公司扮演股票上市推動者角色。 　　【研究發現四】：科技公司的重整期，創投公司扮演企業改造者角色。 　　【研究發現五】：產業組織網絡的綿密度，會影響創投公司之投資品質。 　　【研究發現六】：創投公司的投資金額會影響知識互動之程度。 　　【研究發現七】：僅資金投資的創投公司漸不受科技公司歡迎，具有附加價值的創投公司才有較多空間。 　　二、科技創新互動構面 　　【研究發現八】：創投公司主導資本效率，協助科技公司之技術創新，兩者合力推動經濟發展。 　　【研究發現九】：創新技術透過創業過程取得卓越財務報酬，為科技產業技術成長的動因。 　　【研究發現十】：科技背景的創投公司，較主動推動技術創業，為科技成長做先鋒，財務背景創投公司則傾向於協助經營為主，為科技成長做後援。 　　【研究發現十一】：技術創新的分散性及開放性，促使創投公司的存在與發展。 　　【研究發現十二】：科技知識與經營管理知識的模組化結合，促使新創科技公司與創投公司密切合作。 　　三、知識管理互動構面 　　【研究發現十三】：創投公司的產業網路知識及經營管理知識，對科技公司的協助，優於創投公司之金融資本之效益。 　　【研究發現十四】：產業成熟度越低，創投公司與科技公司之知識互動越緊密。 　　【研究發現十五】：技術導向的技術領先公司，與創投公司之知識互動程度越低。 / The objectives of this thesis intend to explore the knowledge interactive relationship between the venture capitalist and technology industries as well as the key success factors (KSFs) to initiate the interactive basis. Based on the knowledge interactive relationship, this study presents : the roles and functions of the venture capitalist during different business stages, the added-value that the venture capitalist provided, the key factors influencing the interactive relationship, and the changes in technology and innovation as influenced by the venture capitalist. 　　The key success factors initiating the interactive relationship between the venture capitalist and technology industries are the technology company's demand in knowledge and resources as well as the knowledge and resources that the venture capitalist can provided. 　　This study was conducted by using case study methodology covering four samples of high-tech companies and two venture capitalists. The results of this study are as follows: 　　1. During the seed and start-up stages of technological companies, the venture capitalist acts as the promoter and start-up consultant. 　　2. During the growth and development stages of technological companies, the venture capitalist acts as the resource-provider and coordinator. 　　3. During the late stage of technological companies, the venture capitalist acts as the IPO promoter. 　　4. During the re-orgnization stage of technological companies, the venture capitalist acts as the re-structurer. 　　5. The industrial network of the venture capitalist will influence the company's investment performance. 　　6. The investment amount will influence the knowledge interactive intensive of the venture capitalist. 　　7. The venture capitalist only affords capital but without knowledge have been worked difficult. Only the venture capitalists with smart-money and value-added will have development space. 　　8. The venture capitalist leads the capital efficiency and the technical companies lead the technology innovation. Both of them promote the development of economics. 　　9. Start-up new companies with innovative technologies to purchase excellent financial reward are the motive factor of technology development. 　　10. The venture capitalists with technical background will more actively promote the innovative technologies start-up. The venture capitalists with financial background will focus on the management of the investee. 　　11. The diversity of technology innovation builds up the development space basis of the venture capitalists. 　　12. The modularization of the technical innovation and business management is the key factor in pushing the knowledge interactive between technical companies and venture capitalists. 　　13. The industrial network and management knowledge contributions of the venture capitalists are more than the contributions of the capital benefit. 　　14. The more amorphous of the industry, the more knowledge interactive activities between the technical companies and the venture capitalists. 　　15. The more technical-oriented companies, the less knowledge interactive activities between the technical companies and the venture capitalists.