The terms “anti-juridicity” and “custodial sentences” are widely used in the legal world. In this article, the author encourages to question both terms, analyzing if they are coherent with, precisely, what is understood as Law. First, the author wonders if it is correct to talk about “antijuridicity”, taking into account the subject of Law, the ways in which Law is manifested, and the relation between juridicity and Law.Further on, the author analyses if it is correct to talk about a “custodial sentence”, considering the relation between liberty and the human being. All through the article, the author also recounts how the ideas in Law have evolved through recenthistory. / Los términos “antijuridicidad” y “pena privativa de la libertad” son bastante utilizados en el medio legal. El autor del presente artículo invita a cuestionar ambos términos, analizando si son coherentes con, precisamente, lo que se entiende como Derecho. Así, en primer lugar se plantea si es correcto hablar de “antijuridicidad”, teniendo en cuenta el objeto del Derecho, las formas en que se manifiesta el Derecho y la relación entre este y la juridicidad. Asimismo, analiza si es correcto hablar de una “pena privativa de la libertad”, teniendo en cuenta la relación entre ser humano y libertad. Todo ello lo realiza mientras hace un recuento de cómo se ha producido la evolución del pensamiento en el Derecho a lo largo de la historia reciente

Legal education is not a subject of much discussion; however, it is a fundamental matter in the formation of lawyers, and because of that, it is important for students and teachers. In the present article, the author concentrates on the instruction of Administrative Law, focusing on the role of the legal doctrine in this regard and concluding that the form and method of Administrative Law must be specific for this discipline. / La enseñanza del Derecho es un tema sobre el cual no se debate mucho; sin embargo, es un asunto fundamental en la formación del abogado, por lo que es de importancia para alumnos y profesores. En el presente artículo, el autor se centra en la instrucción del Derecho Administrativo, enfocándose en el rol que tiene en ello la Doctrina y concluyendo que la forma y el método del Derecho Administrativo deben ser propios de esa disciplina.

[pt] A Teoria Pura do Direito despontou na primeira metade do século XX como uma vigorosa crítica à teoria jurídica tradicional. A posição que contra esta dirigiu consiste em um impressionante empreendimento epistemológico, articulado de modo a afastar do estudo do Direito elementos políticos e métodos com outras ciências compartilhados. Seu autor, Hans Kelsen, pretendia dotar o jurista de um aparato teórico que lhe permitisse contemplar seu objeto de estudo com a mesma qualidade e exatidão já alcançada por quem das ciências naturais se ocupava. Para tanto, ele considerava necessário que o saber jurídico fosse alçado à categoria de saber científico autônomo, o que buscou realizar com o desenvolvimento da sua célebre doutrina. Não obstante o inconteste avanço que representou, a Teoria Pura do Direito parece conter em seu discurso um problema insolúvel que compromete sua integral sustentabilidade. Trata-se da Cláusula Alternativa Tácita, tese kelseniana versada aqui, cujo delineamento é antecedido pela investigação das premissas e conceitos fundamentais à sua compreensão. / [en] The Pure Theory of Law emerged in the first half of the 20th century as a vigorous criticism to the traditional juridical theory. This opposition consists in an impressive epistemological program, whose main target is to eliminate from the study of Law both political elements and specific methods shared with other sciences. Its author, Hans Kelsen, intended to provide a theoretical apparatus to the jurist which would allow him to contemplate his object with the same qualty and accuracy already attained in the natural sciences. In order to do so, he found necessary the juridical knowledge had both scientificity and autonomy, and his famous doctrine was conceived to achieve that. Nevertheless, in spite of the undeniable progress that came with it, the Pure Theory of Law seems to suffer from an insoluble problem that might compromise its integral sustainability. It is the Tacit Alternative Clause, Kelsenian thesis of which we shall treat here and whose delineation is preceded by the investigation of the premises and concepts which are crucial to its full understanding.

Evengy Pashukanis was a russian legal scholar who with his book Law and Marxism: a general theorydeveloped a theory according to which law emerges from the exchange of commodities undercapitalism. The aim of this essay, called “the Right to the commodity and the origins of subjectivity”,is to determine the meaning of the term “legal subjectivity” and how the legal subject gains “adouble” with a “juridically constituted” will and how this affects a concrete person’s lived experienceaccording to Pashukanis. Legal subjectivity arises from the need of commodities to be exchanged onthe market, which makes the law and the economy mutually dependent upon each other. Thecommodity gives subjectivity to its owner and engenders it with a profit maximizing will, asubjectivation completed through a mutual recognition between two commodity owners in whichthey recognize each other’s abilities to hold rights and duties. This means the subjects recognize eachother as formally equal and independent. This leads to the beliefs that the will comes from theconcrete person and not the commodity, and that the subject is autonomous when in fact it is theresult of a social interplay. When the two legal subjects get into a conflict it gives rise to a statemachinery in the form of the judiciary and the law which appears neutral but acts in accordance withthe needs of the capitalist system, and the legal form, which the machinery then spreads to othersocial relations, turning them into to relations between legal subjects based on rights and duties. Thestate and the economy appear separate but are linked through the legal subject. The legal formtransforms the legal subject into its own double, this more abstract subjectivity can be described asdifferent roles that the legal subject acts out in different scenarios with a will based on the needs ofthe capitalist system, although the will seems to be free and absolute and emanating from theconcrete person. The legal subjectivity is coded as a male and limited in what duties it can take on.

La thèse a été réalisée en cotutelle avec l'Université Paul Céazanne (Aix Marseille III). / Traditionnellement, les armateurs, les États du pavillon et les sociétés de classification ont assuré le maintien des normes internationales de sécurité à bord des navires de commerce. Mais, depuis plusieurs années, la mondialisation impose à ces protagonistes une concurrence féroce obligeant plusieurs d’entre eux à réduire leur contrôle, notamment au plan de la sécurité, afin d’attirer ou de conserver une clientèle. Ce désengagement à l’égard du système de renforcement juridique des prescriptions internationales et la « course vers le fond » qu’il induit sur le plan de la sécurité sont des éléments laminant la condition de navigabilité des navires. Afin de réduire le nombre de bâtiments de mer sous normes en circulation dans leur région, des autorités maritimes d’États portuaires ont conclu et mis en oeuvre des mémorandums d’entente sur le contrôle par l’État port, communément appelés MoU, qui établissent des règles de coordination de l’inspection des navires en escale. En réalité, ces ententes administratives, qui réunissent désormais les pays de neuf régions maritimes mondiales, incarnent des réseaux transgouvernementaux formés de relations transnationales complexes entre des fonctionnaires-cadres qui sont aussi des experts de la sécurité maritime. Ainsi, au-delà de leur origine et de leur culture respectives, ces derniers partagent, au plan professionnel, des valeurs et des intérêts communs. Ceci concourt à la cohésion interne de ces organisations alors qu’il s’agit d’instruments non contraignants relevant de la soft law. Même à l’extérieur du cadre imposé par le droit positif, ces règles qualifiées d’interstitielles peuvent néanmoins avoir une valeur normative quasi juridique, sinon juridique. Cette valeur normative des mesures de coordination mises en œuvre par les MoU peut être établie grâce à la démonstration de leur effectivité ainsi que de leur efficacité. Dans le premier cas, il s’agit de vérifier si les règles s’imposent à ceux qu’elles visent. Dans le second, il faut s’assurer qu’elles permettent d’atteindre les objectifs fixés. Par ailleurs, il faut se demander si le constat d’une normativité juridique doit se limiter uniquement à ces deux aspects. En effet, les règles que les réseaux transgouvernementaux mettent de l’avant devraient aussi assurer un minimum de transparence au risque sinon de créer un droit obscur. / Traditionally, shipowners, flag states and classification societies have ensured the implementation of international security standards aboard merchant vessels. Yet, in recent years, globalization has created an environment of ferocious competition that has forced these actors to reduce their controls, principally with regard to security, in order to attract new clients or to conserve an existing clientele. Such disengagement from the established system of legal enforcement of international norms, as well as the “race to the bottom” it induces with regard to security, are both elements of an ongoing erosion of the seaworthiness of vessels. In order to reduce the number of substandard vessels sailing in their regions, members of the maritime authorities of port states have executed and implemented Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (MoU), which establish rules coordinating the inspection of ships on layover. These administrative agreements, which now regroup countries from nine international maritime regions, have in fact become transgovernmental networks composed of complex transnational relationships between managing civil servants who are also experts in maritime security. Thus, beyond their respective nationalities and cultures, these civil servants share, on the professional scale, common interests and values. This contributes to the internal cohesion of these organisations, even though they are concerned with non-binding soft law instruments. Nevertheless, even outside the obligatory framework of positive law, these « interstitial » rules may have a quasi-normative, if not fully normative, effect. Such a normative value for the coordination measures put in place by the MoU may be established by demonstrating their effectiveness as well as their efficacy. First, by assessing whether the rules are applied to those toward whom they are directed; and second, by verifying that they work toward the objectives that have been set. Moreover, it is necessary to ask whether the assessment of the legal normativity of these rules must be limited to the previous two aspects. Indeed, the rules put forth by the intergovernmental networks should ensure a minimum of transparency, lest it become a body of dark law.

Lobbying regulation in the Czech Republic - recommendations based on international experience Summary Lobbying is a natural part of contemporary globalized world, where political interests meet intensively with the economic and other private interests. In order to strengthen the principles, especially transparency and responsibility, some countries adopt lobbying regulation. The USA, Canada, Poland, Hungary, Lithuania and the EU institutions approach to lobbying in some aspects in the same way, in many other aspects they approach to it very differently. Different historical and socio-economical experience of these entities has, often substantial, influence on the differences of their regulation approach. The Czech Republic shares with many mentioned countries the experience of post- communist state, which does not have long democratic political culture and which has many problems with corruption in the public decision-making process. Lobbying regulation under Czech conditions is therefore necessary for raising transparency and responsibility of politicians. During the preparation of the future regulation, it is necessary to respect recmmendations of the international organizations and to thoroughly analyze experience of other states. The necessary parts of the future law should be especially: clear...

Submitted by Maicon Juliano Schmidt (maicons) on 2015-07-13T19:40:55Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Santiago Artur Berger Sito.pdf: 1223303 bytes, checksum: 1d8229905ae79f24d71835401e4ee9aa (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-13T19:40:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Santiago Artur Berger Sito.pdf: 1223303 bytes, checksum: 1d8229905ae79f24d71835401e4ee9aa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-03-20 / Nenhuma / Em tempos de Constitucionalismo Contemporâneo, o presente trabalho surge com um objetivo pontual e determinado: lançar luzes sobre duas propostas que surgem no interior do constitucionalismo emergente do segundo pós-guerra, para averiguar como ambas as teorias do direito, em uma perspectiva ampla (mas que problematizam a intepretação e a decisão, de certo modo), analisam o problema (interpretativo) deixado pelo(s) positivismo(s). A proposta se compreende dentro de um paradigma filosófico alinhavado com a fenomenologia hermenêutica, que desconsidera os métodos (no sentido cartesiano) como instrumentos de averiguação da verdade. Ao fazê-lo, em um primeiro momento, embrenha-se em perquirir parcela do que foi feito neste ambiente teórico representado pelo Constitucionalismo Contemporâneo, bem como em seus reflexos no Brasil. Em um segundo momento, especificamente duas teorias são estudadas: de um lado, a proposta de Jürgen Habermas, na Teoria Discursiva do Direito, em que são convocados postulados morais de Klaus Günther, filósofo que trabalha a questão dos discursos de fundamentação/justificação e os discursos de aplicação; de outro lado, a Crítica Hermenêutica do Direito, conjuminada por Lenio Luiz Streck, estribado em aportes da Filosofia Hermenêutica de Martin Heidegger, da Hermenêutica Filosófica de Hans-Georg Gadamer, bem como da Teoria Integrativa de Ronald Dworkin. Tais investigações permitirão fazer um comparativo na forma como a interpretação e a compreensão se dão em ambas as vertentes. Por fim, visando obter um comprometimento com o contexto teórico da atualidade, colocam-se as propostas discursivas em foco, concluindo que os aportes hermenêuticos sugerem uma via de acesso ao conhecimento, em direito, mais alinhada com os avanços da filosofia. Em linhas gerais, o trabalho apresenta-se como uma ferramenta de análise que, ao definir suas bases, deixa claro o lugar da fala e, com fidelidade ao programa, pergunta-se pelas condições da interpretação no atual paradigma jusfilosófico. / In times of Contemporary Constitutionalism, this work comes with a timely and specific goal: to shed light on two proposals that arise within the emerging constitutionalism of the second postwar period, to ascertain how two theories of law, in a wide perspective (but that study the issues of interpretation and decision, in a certain way), analyze the problem left by the positivism(s). The proposal is understood within a philosophical paradigm basted with hermeneutic phenomenology, which disregards the methods (in the cartesian way) as a tool for finding the truth. And in doing so, at first, penetrates into a portion of what was done in this theoretical environment represented by the Contemporary Constitutionalism and its consequences in Brazil. In a second step, specifically two theories are studied: on one hand the proposal of Jürgen Habermas, Discoursive Theory of Law, which called moral propositions of Klaus Günther, a philosopher who works the question of the reasons/justification discourses and application discourses; on the other side to Critical Hermeneutics of Law, gathered by Lenio Luiz Streck, using in intakes of Hermeneutic Philosophy of Martin Heidegger, the Philosophical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer, and the Integrative Theory of Ronald Dworkin. Such investigations will allow a comparison in how the interpretation and understanding occur in both brands. Finally, to obtain a commitment to the theoretical context of today, assesses the relevance of the proposals, concluding that the hermeneutic contributions suggest a means of access to knowledge in law, more in line with advances in philosophy. In general, the work presents itself as an analysis tool that, when determining their bases, makes clear the place of speech, and with fidelity to the program, will the conditions of interpretation in the actual law-philosophical paradigm.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:20:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Gizela Maria Bodi.pdf: 1032398 bytes, checksum: bd4ee49c317d436e6b6fac01c760a6b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05-19 / This research has the scope of analyzing the informal work, very common in the current Brazilian scenario, into the current social insurance system, starting from the communicative conception of law. Indeed, the informality of employment relationship proves to be a major challenge for contemporary states, notably in the social insurance sphere, in which the exercise of paid work, by itself, is insufficient to the membership and to the consequent social protection of the members from this category. Considering that the informal work corresponds to the activity performed outside of the statutory rule, the chosen method of study was the logical and systematic examination, starting from the premise that the law is a system of communication, operationalized through verbal written language, as proposed by Paulo de Barros Carvalho. Thus, based on the idea of autopoiesis of law, in which law creates its own reality, separated and more restrictive than social reality, we seek to examine critically whether there is indeed dialogical interaction between the social insurance system and the social one, which echoes on the incidence of social insurance laws, especially the membership rule. Based on these premises, after examining the differential systems of low-income insured and the individual microentrepreneurs recent mechanisms of social insurance inclusion we will set out proposals to overcoming informality in the legal framework, considering not only a change on the evidence paradigm of gainful activity, but also an structural reformulation of the social insurance system, which is caused today on formal worker protection, based on the contingency risk of the activity. This circumstance leads also to reflection on the need of a new social pact in the country / A presente pesquisa tem por escopo a análise do trabalho informal, tão presente no cenário brasileiro atual, frente o sistema de previdência social em vigor, partindo-se da concepção comunicacional do Direito. Com efeito, a informalidade das relações de trabalho revela-se um dos principais desafios para os Estados Contemporâneos, notadamente na esfera previdenciária, em que o desempenho de atividade remunerada, por si só, é insuficiente à filiação e consequente proteção social dos integrantes dessa categoria. Considerando-se que o trabalho informal, em linhas gerais, corresponde à atividade desenvolvida à margem da regulamentação legal, foi eleito como método de estudo o exame lógico-sistemático do tema, partindo-se da premissa de que o Direito é um sistema comunicacional, somente se operacionalizando através da linguagem verbal escrita, tal como proposto por Paulo de Barros Carvalho. Assim, pautando-se na ideia de autopoiese do Direito, segundo a qual este cria a sua própria realidade, distinta e mais restrita que a social, busca-se analisar de forma crítica se há, efetivamente, interação dialógica entre os sistemas previdenciário e o social, o que repercute, em última análise, na incidência das normas jurídicas previdenciárias, especialmente a de filiação. Com base em tais premissas, após examinado o regime diferenciado dos segurados baixa renda e o especial dos microempreendedores individuais (MEI) - mecanismos recentes de inclusão previdenciária -, serão formuladas propostas de superação da informalidade, no âmbito jurídico, o que leva em conta não apenas a alteração dos meios de prova da atividade remunerada, mas também eventual reformulação estrutural do sistema de previdência social que, hoje, é voltado à proteção do trabalhador, com base no risco de contingência social da atividade desenvolvida. Tal circunstância leva, ainda, à reflexão sobre a necessidade de um novo pacto social no país

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:20:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Fabricio de Carvalho Serafini.pdf: 2174708 bytes, checksum: b4b0a81d724e6647978c41ed2cd174c0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-04-23 / Starting with the forecast, in our positive law, about the extinguishing of the punshability of the tax crimes, for the tax payment (regardless of the time), we arrive at the conclusion that the criminal law is working as collecting agent of the tax law, what it opposes the characteristic of ultima ratio of the first one, characteristic this, pointed since its origins, until the present days, as basic with respect to the same, being one of its differentials for other branches of low. This show us that's more important for our State the payment of the tax then the punishment for who commit tax crimes. This coaction propagated by the accusation for tax crime ended showing very efficient, therefore it increased the tax collection, which will be argued in terms of the general theory of the law, once confirmed what we always defend, unique as characteristic of the complete rules of law, of the several species of norms, that is the forecast of a sanction, for the State, for the one who did not follow the law, imposed in coercitive way. This took us to study the sanction, as well as differentiating the coaction of the coercion, therefore the first one happens before the non compliance of the complete rule of law, threatening the expectation of a sanction, while the second one happens after the non compliance of the complete rule of law, being the application form of the sanction. Confirming our sanctionist idea, we look for the reasons of the fulfilment of many of the rules of law are given by the fear of the sanction, what took us to look for answers in psychology, more specifically in its analysis of the behavior stream (behaviourism), but for our surprise, this showed unfruitful. With this disillusionment, we went to search aid in an opposing chain, the psychoanalysis, more precisely in the ideas of its founder Sigmund Freud. Its ideas in social, cultural and anthropological terms, permeated for its fundamental concepts of the psychoanalysis, had supplied what we looked for, that is, the confirmation of that the human beings follow many norms due to the fear of its sanctions, what it strengthened our sanctionist idea of the law / Partindo da previsão, em nosso direito positivo, da extinção da punibilidade dos crimes tributários, pelo pagamento do tributo (independentemente do seu momento), chegamos à conclusão de que o direito penal está funcionando como agente arrecadador do direito tributário, o que contraria a característica de ultima ratio do primeiro, característica essa, apontada desde seus primórdios, até os dias de hoje, como fundamental para o mesmo, sendo um de seus diferenciais para os demais ramos do direito. Isso nos mostra que mais importa para o nosso Estado o pagamento do tributo do que a punição para os que cometem crimes tributários. Essa coação veiculada pela acusação por crime tributário acabou por se mostrar muito eficiente, pois aumentou a arrecadação tributária, o que será discutido em termos da teoria geral do direito, pois confirmou o que sempre defendemos, como característica diferenciadora das normas jurídicas completas, das demais espécies de normas, que é a previsão de uma sanção, pelo Estado, para seu descumpridor, imposta de maneira coercitiva. Isso nos levou a estudar a sanção, bem como diferenciar a coação da coerção, pois a primeira se dá antes do descumprimento da norma jurídica completa, ameaçando, pela previsão de uma sanção, ao passo que a segunda se dá após o descumprimento da norma jurídica completa, sendo a forma de aplicação da sanção. Ao confirmamos a nossa idéia sancionista, procuramos buscar os porquês do cumprimento de muitas das normas jurídicas se dar pelo temor da sanção, o que nos levou a buscar respostas na psicologia, mais especificamente na sua corrente análise do comportamento (behaviorismo), mas para nossa surpresa, isso se mostrou infrutífero. Com essa decepção, fomos buscar auxílio numa corrente oposta, a psicanálise, mais precisamente nas idéias de seu fundador Sigmund Freud. As suas idéias em termos sociais, culturais e antropológicos, permeadas por seus conceitos basilares da psicanálise, nos forneceram o que procurávamos, ou seja, a confirmação de que os seres humanos seguem muitas normas devido ao temor de suas sanções, o que reforçou a nossa idéia sancionista do direito

Ce travail propose une interprétation d’ensemble de la théorie du droit et de la théorie du contrôle judiciaire de constitutionnalité des lois de l’auteur canadien contemporain Wilfrid Waluchow, à partir d’une étude de la manière dont elles s’inspirent de la conception classique de la common law. La partie préliminaire présente de façon synthétique la conception classique de la common law et la critique que lui adresse Thomas Hobbes, pour montrer comment elles font apparaître, dès les origines de la modernité, deux façons opposées de concevoir le droit, qui sous-tendent la pensée contemporaine. La première partie étudie le rapport que les conceptions du droit des inspirateurs plus immédiats de Wilfrid Waluchow entretiennent avec la conception classique de la common law. Elle explique comment H. L. A. Hart contribue à rapprocher le positivisme juridique de la vision coutumière des common lawyers à l’aide de la notion de règles secondaires et comment Ronald Dworkin associe plutôt l’approche de la common law à une méthode d’interprétation centrée sur la dimension argumentative du droit. La deuxième partie examine le positivisme juridique inclusif de Wilfrid Waluchow et la théorie de common law du contrôle judiciaire qu’il élabore à partir de celui-ci et elle montre comment l’effort de l’auteur canadien pour conjuguer dans sa pensée les influences des conceptions du droit de Hart et de Dworkin, à l’aide en particulier de la notion de moralité constitutionnelle, l’amène à développer une vision qui possède des affinités importantes avec la conception classique de la common law. / This work offers a general interpretation of the theory of law and the theory of judicial review of Canadian contemporary author Wilfrid Waluchow, through the study of their relation to classical common law jurisprudence. The preliminary section offers a summary of classical common law jurisprudence and of Thomas Hobbes’s critique of classical common law jurisprudence, and shows how they define two opposite ways of conceptualizing law that still underlie contemporary jurisprudence. The first section studies how the jurisprudence of H. L. A. Hart and of Ronald Dworkin, which directly inspire Wilfrid Waluchow’s theory of law, relate to classical common law jurisprudence. It shows how Hart, with his concept of secondary rules, moves legal positivism closer to classical common law’s customary understanding of the law and how Dworkin defines the common law approach otherwise, by proposing an interpretive method concentrating on the argumentative character of law.The second section studies Wilfrid Waluchow’s inclusive legal positivism and his common law theory of judicial review. It shows how Wilfrid Waluchow’s effort to reconcile Hart’s theory of the law with Dworkin’s jurisprudence, notably through the idea of constitutional morality, leads him to develop an understanding of the law which has important affinities with classical common law jurisprudence.