Global ETD Search

11	Att bevara den brutala sanningen sann: En komparativ studie av förringande, urskuldande och förnekande av Förintelsen i svensk och i tysk rätt. / Keeping the brutal truth true: A comparative study of trivialising, condoning and denying of the Holocaust in Swedish and German law. W. Todtenhaupt, Lukas January 2023 (has links) No description available. Hets mot folkgrupp yttrandefrihet tysk straffrätt Rådets rambeslut 2008/913/RIF Förintelsen. Law Juridik
12	Den syrisk ortodoxa kyrkans roll i sammanhållningen av det syrianska/assyriska folket : En kvalitativ studie utifrån ett kvinnligt perspektiv, med fokus på syrianer/assyrier i Stockholm Wasfi, Samar, Noyan, Belinda January 2017 (has links) Denna kvalitativa studie inleder med en kort förklaring och beskrivning till uppsatsens titel samt ämne Den syrisk ortodoxa kyrkans roll i sammanhållningen av det syrianska/assyriska folket. Bakgrund till det syrianska/assyriska folket i Sverige samt dess fortlevnad, har föranlett studiens frågeställning: Vilken roll har den syrisk ortodoxa kyrkan i sammanhållningen av det syrianska/assyriska folket i Stockholm, utifrån Ahrnes och Brunssons (2011) sociologiska teori om organisationselementen? Denna forskning avser att studera den syrisk ortodoxa kyrkans roll i sammanhållningen av det syrianska/assyriska folket utifrån ett kvinnoperspektiv med stöd av Ahrnes och Brunssons (2011) sociologiska teori om organisationselementen. För att undersöka detta gjordes sex intervjuer med syrianska/assyriska kvinnor av första generationens invandrare i Stockholm vars ålder varierar mellan 50–60 år. Rubriken “2.2 Tidigare forskning” syftar på att ge studien ett underlag samt att komplettera ramarna som huvudteorin strukturerat, för att skapa en bredare förståelse kring frågeställningens användning av begreppen ortodoxa, kyrkan samt folket. Studiens resultat har visat att det finns ett visst samband mellan kyrkans roll i sammanhållningen av syrianer/assyrier som folkgrupp i Stockholm; att vara en materiell kollektiv resurs i form av en social arena där individer inom gemenskapen kan mötas samt dela normer, värderingar samt traditioner. Kyrkans huvudsakliga roll är att stå som en arena där Ahrne samt Brunssons (2011) organisationselement kan utövas samt bevaras; medlemskap, regler, hierarki, övervakning samt sanktioner. Resultatet kan ha betydelse för vidare studier inom minoritetsgrupper samt dess fortlevnad. Göran Ahrne Nils Brunsson organisationsteori organisationselement minoritetsgrupp sammanhållning syrianer assyrier ortodox kyrka kristen kyrka folkgrupp Sociology Sociologi
13	Yttrandefrihetens dilemma : en idécentrerad studie om yttrandefrihetens roll och begränsningar Persson, Daniel January 2009 (has links) <p>This paper concerns the freedom of speech in our democracy and the principles underlying the restrictions. The study is aimed at using a descriptive theory to provide a useful basis for analyzing a justification of the role behind freedom of speech and its limitations. The analysis is made on the basis of the Swedish parliament debate in the form of motions and the non-governmental organization Swedish Helsinki Committee's report. The study has a focus on the law of hate speech and will be done with an idea centred analysis. On the basis of democratic theory, the central role of freedom of speech was clarified on the basis of a clear need for a reliable communication. An absence of this process could disrupt the democratic order. The theoretical function of restrictions is to maintain that reliable communication process where, for example, special circumstances, threats of violence and certain types of information were seen as examples of situations where the process could be in danger.</p><p>The empirical result was largely in line with the theoretical conclusions. The ability to argue and keep open debates was seen as important building blocks in a democratic society and therefore implies the benefits of a reliable communication process. Justification for the restrictions was made with regard to harmful information, threatening circumstances and xenophobic organizations, who were examples of counter-productive expressions to the democratic order. However, the study showed that parliamentary motions and the Swedish Helsinki Committee often focused their justifications on different fundamental views which partly could be explained by the concepts of positive and negative freedom and the perception of minority rights. The findings indicated that the issue of restrictions on freedom of speech is extremely complex because of the varied opinions in the drafting of the law of hate speech. The dilemma of freedom of expression can therefore be seen as relevant up to this day.</p> democracy freedom of speech restrictions hate speech swedish parliament swedish helsinki committee demokrati yttrandefrihet begränsningar hets mot folkgrupp riksdagen svenska helsingforskommittén Political science Statsvetenskap
14	Yttrandefrihetens dilemma : en idécentrerad studie om yttrandefrihetens roll och begränsningar Persson, Daniel January 2009 (has links) This paper concerns the freedom of speech in our democracy and the principles underlying the restrictions. The study is aimed at using a descriptive theory to provide a useful basis for analyzing a justification of the role behind freedom of speech and its limitations. The analysis is made on the basis of the Swedish parliament debate in the form of motions and the non-governmental organization Swedish Helsinki Committee's report. The study has a focus on the law of hate speech and will be done with an idea centred analysis. On the basis of democratic theory, the central role of freedom of speech was clarified on the basis of a clear need for a reliable communication. An absence of this process could disrupt the democratic order. The theoretical function of restrictions is to maintain that reliable communication process where, for example, special circumstances, threats of violence and certain types of information were seen as examples of situations where the process could be in danger. The empirical result was largely in line with the theoretical conclusions. The ability to argue and keep open debates was seen as important building blocks in a democratic society and therefore implies the benefits of a reliable communication process. Justification for the restrictions was made with regard to harmful information, threatening circumstances and xenophobic organizations, who were examples of counter-productive expressions to the democratic order. However, the study showed that parliamentary motions and the Swedish Helsinki Committee often focused their justifications on different fundamental views which partly could be explained by the concepts of positive and negative freedom and the perception of minority rights. The findings indicated that the issue of restrictions on freedom of speech is extremely complex because of the varied opinions in the drafting of the law of hate speech. The dilemma of freedom of expression can therefore be seen as relevant up to this day. democracy freedom of speech restrictions hate speech swedish parliament swedish helsinki committee demokrati yttrandefrihet begränsningar hets mot folkgrupp riksdagen svenska helsingforskommittén
15	Milletsystemet : Minoritetsskydd och grupprättigheter i ett historiskt perspektiv Alouch, Nora January 2016 (has links) Minority protection mechanisms in international law aim to guarantee certain individual rights to persons belonging to ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities, such as freedom of culture, religion and language. These rights can be considered to be of collective interest for minority group identity and therefore often require the possibility of collective enjoyment. In addition to general human rights and principles of non-discrimination, minority protection can alternately be ensured through minority specific rights. However, minority specific rights would not operate effectively without evolving a concept of collective (or group) rights in international law. Hence, while this kind of approach can provide legal methods for balancing the interests of individuals, groups and the state, it creates the possibility of conflicts with the international framework of individual rights. The ottoman millet system sets a historical example of minority protection instruments based on a collective concept of human rights. Furthermore, the ottoman history offers an illustration of what could go terribly wrong with a collective rights model. By analyzing the millet system and the ottoman legal reforms in the nineteenth century I will discuss reoccurring issues with collective rights. I will argue that incorporating collective rights within a structure founded on individual rights is a problematic way of protecting individuals belonging to minorities and other vulnerably ethnic groups. Looking through the historical development of universal human rights some important aspects of its main principles will be brought up in this paper. ottoman empire milletsystem minority protection collective rights group rights individual rights human rights legal reform nineteenth century equality discrimination ottomanska imperiet milletsystemet minoritetsskydd minoritetsspecifika rättigheter minoritet majoritet folkgrupp diskriminering kollektiva rättigheter grupprättigheter individuella rättigheter mänskliga rättigheter artikel 27 ICCPR självbestämmande dhimmis millet kolonisering ius publicum europaeum aritmetisk jämlikhet geometrisk jämlikhet armeniska folkmordet likhetsprincipen legala reformer

Page generated in 0.0448 seconds