Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 GilmarSM_DISSERT.pdf: 1971698 bytes, checksum: e38746a7fd4df1303ea0a1129409fe80 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-07-08 / The research aims to analyze the reasons and the unique role of prosecutors in the promotion of public policies. The opening lines deal with the evolution and expansion of the general theory of the fundamental rights in the international and national levels and that have led to the creation of a welfare state concerned with carrying out positive actions which aim at the community well-being. Thus, it is clear that, after the uneven development of the Brazilian democracy, the Constitution of 1988 not only has erected to a state socially responsible, but also built a system of guarantees which highlights the significant expansion of the Powers of the Public Ministry and has now taken an outstanding position in regard to collective rights, allowing, at the same time, its members to perform the syndication of state actions, particularly public policies, correcting the course of these administrative processes in the presence of poor management and inactivity of the public administrator when acting in defense of fundamental rights. This ministerial activism, even facing the obstacles and boundaries submitted to its pursuit, has shown an increase in actions that culminated, in the last ten years, in a significant number of judicial and extrajudicial measures that indicated the correction of public policies and actions in areas of health, education, housing and the environment. In this process of monitoring and doing, the important role of the other social characters is highlighted, especially the one of the citizen who is responsible for most of the complaints that start the initiatives of the Public Ministry and that can be deployed through a significant list of judicial and extrajudicial instruments, especially the important procedure that allows the hearing and participation of the involved in the implementation of public policies, enabling a collective even a consensual solution of the matter generated among the Public Administration. Given these initiatives, the ministerial activism has established itself as a movement of its own characteristics, aimed to guarantee the fundamental rights, especially when these are not targeted by state actions that should contribute to the achievement of the democratic state of law idealized by the Federal Constitution without any distortion of direction. Nevertheless, this activism still seeks for its full accomplishment in the practical world / A pesquisa tem por objetivo a an?lise das justificativas e das particularidades da atua??o do Minist?rio P?blico na promo??o de pol?ticas p?blicas. As linhas iniciais tratam da evolu??o e expans?o da teoria geral dos direitos fundamentais, nos planos internacional e nacional, que culminaram com a cria??o de um Estado social preocupado com a realiza??o de a??es positivas, objetivando o bem-estar comunit?rio. Nesta linha, percebe-se que, ap?s o desenvolvimento irregular da democracia brasileira, a Constitui??o Federal de 1988 n?o s? erigiu um Estado socialmente respons?vel como edificou um sistema de garantias em que se destaca a amplia??o significativa das atribui??es do Minist?rio P?blico, que passou a assumir posi??o de destaque quanto ? defesa dos direitos coletivos, permitindo, no mesmo passo, que seus membros realizassem a sindic?ncia das a??es estatais, em especial das pol?ticas p?blicas, corrigindo os rumos destes processos administrativos na presen?a de m? gest?o ou ina??o do administrador p?blico quando do patroc?nio dos direitos fundamentais. Este ativismo ministerial, mesmo diante dos obst?culos e limites apresentados ao seu exerc?cio, tem apresentado um crescente aumento de a??es que culminaram, nos ?ltimos dez anos, com um representativo n?mero de decis?es judiciais e medidas extrajudiciais que apontaram a corre??o de pol?ticas e a??es p?blicas nas ?reas da sa?de, educa??o, habita??o e meio ambiente. Neste processo de vigil?ncia e a??o, destaca-se o importante papel dos demais atores sociais, especialmente do cidad?o, respons?vel pela maioria das den?ncias que movimentam as iniciativas do Minist?rio P?blico e podem ser efetivadas atrav?s de um significativo elenco de instrumentos judiciais e extrajudiciais, destacando-se, entre estes ?ltimos, o novel procedimento promocional que permite a ouvida e participa??o dos envolvidos na realiza??o de pol?ticas p?blicas, viabilizando uma solu??o colegiada e at? mesmo consensual do impasse havido perante a administra??o p?blica. Diante dessas iniciativas, o ativismo ministerial se consagra como movimento de caracter?sticas pr?prias, direcionado ao garantimento dos direitos fundamentais, sobretudo quando n?o s?o visados pelas a??es estatais que deveriam, sem qualquer desvio de prumo, contribuir para a realiza??o do Estado Democr?tico de Direito idealizado na Constitui??o Federal, mas ainda busca sua plena concretiza??o no mundo dos fatos / 2020-01-01

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 EdigleusonCR_DISSERT.pdf: 780051 bytes, checksum: 386f2ccd61fb790eba398bea5637824b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-08-29 / This dissertation deals with the social function of the contract, based on constitutional principles, especially those relating to fundamental rights. The social function of the contract (general clause) is described in the Civil Code so intentionally generic, no precise criteria to define it. Because of the fluidity of this principle, it is justified its closer study, seeking to assess its various meanings and looking away from the legal uncertainty that an unlimited conceptual vagueness can cause. The social function of the contract arises from a transformation experienced in private law from the inflows received from the Constitutional Law, the result of an evolutionary process by which it became the state structure, leaving the foundations of the classical liberal state and moving toward a vision guided by existential human values that give the keynote of the Welfare State. Arose, then the concern about the effectiveness of fundamental rights in relations between individuals, which is studied from the inapplicability of fundamental rights in private relations (U.S. doctrine of State action), passing to the analysis of the Theory of indirect horizontal effect of fundamental rights (of German creation and majority acceptance), reaching the right horizontal efficacy Theory of fundamental rights, prevailing Brazilian doctrine and jurisprudence. It has also been investigated the foundations of the social contract, pointing out that, apart from the provisions of the constitutional legislation, that base the principle on screen, there have also been noticed foundations in the Federal Constitution, in devices like the art. 1, III, the dignity of the human person is the north of the relationship between contractors. Also art. 3rd, I CF/88 bases the vision of social covenants, equipping it for the implementation of social solidarity, as one of the fundamental objectives of the Republic. Still on art. 170 of the Constitution it is seen as a locus of reasoning in the social function of the contract, the maintenance of the economic order. It is also studied the internal and external aspects of the social function of the contract, being the first part the one that considers the requirement of respect for contractual loyalty, through the objective good faith, as a result of the dignity of the hirer may not be offended by the other through the contract. On the other hand, the external facet of the social function of the contract, in line with the constitutional mandate of solidarity, indicates the need for contractors to respect the rights of society, namely the diffuse, collective and individual third party. In this external appearance, it is also pointed the notion of external credit protection, addressing the duty of society to respect the contract. There has been shown some notions of the social contract in comparative law. Then, there has been investigated the content of principle study, through their interrelationships with other provisions of private and constitutional law, namely equality, objective good faith, private autonomy and dignity of the human person. We study the application of the social contract in contractual networks as well as the guidance of conservation of contracts, especially those denominated long-term captive contracts, considering the theory of substantive due performance, concluding with an analysis of the social contract in code of Consumer Protection / A presente disserta??o trata da fun??o social do contrato, ? luz dos princ?pios constitucionais, notadamente aqueles relativos aos direitos fundamentais. A fun??o social do contrato (cl?usula geral) vem descrita no C?digo Civil de forma propositalmente gen?rica, sem crit?rios precisos que a definam. Por conta da fluidez desse princ?pio, justifica-se o seu estudo mais aprimorado, buscando aferir as suas v?rias acep??es e procurando afastar a inseguran?a jur?dica que uma imprecis?o conceitual ilimitada pode ocasionar. A fun??o social do contrato decorre de uma transforma??o vivenciada no direito privado, a partir dos influxos recebidos do Direito Constitucional, fruto de um processo evolutivo por qual passou a estrutura estatal, deixando as bases cl?ssicas do Estado liberal e passando a adotar uma vis?o orientada pelos valores humanos existenciais que d?o a t?nica do Estado Social. Surgiu, ent?o, a preocupa??o com a efic?cia dos direitos fundamentais nas rela??es entre particulares, onde se estuda, a partir da inaplicabilidade dos direitos fundamentais nas rela??es privadas (doutrina americana do State action), passando-se ? an?lise da Teoria da efic?cia horizontal indireta dos direitos fundamentais (de cria??o e aceita??o majorit?ria alem?), chegando ? Teoria da efic?cia horizontal direita dos direitos fundamentais, predominante na doutrina e jurisprud?ncia brasileira. Investigam-se ainda os fundamentos da fun??o social do contrato, apontando-se que, al?m dos dispositivos constantes na legisla??o infraconstitucional, que d?o base para o princ?pio em tela, verifica-se tamb?m alicerces na Constitui??o Federal, em dispositivos como o do art. 1?, III, sendo a dignidade da pessoa humana o norte principal da rela??o entre os contratantes. Tamb?m o art. 3?, I da CF/88 fundamenta a vis?o social das aven?as, instrumentalizando-a para a implementa??o da solidariedade social, como um dos objetivos fundamentais da Rep?blica. Ainda o art. 170 da Constitui??o ? visto como um locus de fundamenta??o da fun??o social do contrato, na manuten??o da ordem econ?mica. Estuda-se, ainda, os aspectos interno e externo da fun??o social do contrato, sendo a primeira vertente aquela que considera a exig?ncia de respeito ? lealdade contratual, por meio da boa-f? objetiva, como decorr?ncia de que a dignidade de um contratante n?o pode ser ofendida pelo outro atrav?s do contrato. J? a faceta externa da fun??o social do contrato, na linha do mandamento constitucional da solidariedade, indica a necessidade dos contratantes respeitarem os direitos da sociedade, a saber, os difusos, coletivos e de terceiros individualizados. Neste aspecto externo, toca-se ainda na no??o de tutela externa do cr?dito, abordando o dever de respeito da sociedade para com o contrato. Mostra-se algumas no??es da fun??o social do contrato no direito comparado. Em seguida, investiga-se o conte?do do princ?pio em estudo, atrav?s de suas inter-rela??es com outros preceitos do direito privado e constitucional, a saber, igualdade, boa-f? objetiva, autonomia privada e a dignidade da pessoa humana. Estuda-se a aplica??o da fun??o social contratual nas redes contratuais, bem como a orienta??o de conserva??o dos contratos, notadamente naqueles denominados contratos cativos de longa dura??o, considerando-se a teoria do adimplemento substancial, finalizando com uma an?lise da fun??o social do contrato no C?digo de Defesa do Consumidor

Le principe dispositif est le principe directeur du procès civil qui consacre la maîtrise par les parties de leur litige. Da mihi factum, dabo tibi jus ; l’adage est classique. Tandis que l’office des parties serait d’apporter les faits, le juge devrait dire le droit. L’évolution de la procédure civile semble cependant traduire une remise en cause de cet équilibre ainsi qu’en témoignent le développement du principe de coopération et l’avènement du principe de juridiction. Pour autant, il est permis de considérer que ce n’est pas tant le principe dispositif qui est en cause que les analyses qui en ont été faites. Le litige est toujours la chose des parties, seulement la conceptualisation traditionnelle qui est attachée au principe ne permet plus de s’en convaincre. L’objet de l’étude est donc de procéder au renouvellement des analyses faites du principe dispositif afin de mettre en évidence que ce dernier peut prétendre, comme l’avait écrit Motulsky, à l’épithète de fondamental. Pour ce faire, il convient tout d’abord de procéder au renouvellement de l’analyse de sa fonction. Le principe dispositif n’est pas un principe de l’instance mais une garantie de la fonction juridictionnelle, qui consacre l’office des parties, non pas quant aux charges processuelles, mais quant aux demandes. Cette analyse amène alors à renouveler celle relative à sa nature. La qualification de principe directeur doit être abandonnée au profit de celle de droit fondamental, droit fondamental qui devrait faire l’objet d’une constitutionnalisation. L’étude permet ainsi de conclure que le fait ne s’oppose pas au droit, mais est source de droit. Derrière la maxime da mihi factum, dabo tibi jus, il faut entendre donne-moi le fait juridique, je te donnerai la norme juridictionnelle. / The principle of party disposition is the civil trial guiding principle which enshrines the power, for the parties, of having their own litigation under control. Da mihi factum, dabo tibi jus is a well-known adage. The judge should interpret the law while the parties’ role would be to bring the facts to him.However, the civil proceeding evolution seems to show a reconsideration of this balance, as reflected by the development of the principle of cooperation and the emergence of the principle of jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the main matter might not be the principle of party disposition but the analysis that were done. The parties are still exercising sole control over their own litigation but the classical conceptualization of the principle of party disposition is making some doubts appear. The purpose of the study consists in renewing all analysis on the principle of party disposition in order to highlight his “fundamental” character, as Motulsky wrote it. In order to achieve this, the first thing to do is renewing the analysis on its function. The principle of party disposition is not a principle of the trial but a guarantee for the jurisdictional function, which enshrines the role of the parties regarding requests, not procedural charges. This study leads to renew the analysis on the nature of the principle of party disposition. The guiding principle designation must be dropped out and replaced by the fundamental right one, which should be enshrined in the Constitution. The conclusion of the study may be that facts and law are not opposed; in the contrary, facts are a source of law. The Da mihi factum, dabo tibi jus adage must be understood as tell me what the legal fact is, I will tell you what the law states.

Em um Estado Democrático de Direito, o direito fundamental à liberdade de expressão deve ser tratado de forma heterogênea, sendo capaz de gozar de um status de direito fundamental preferencial prima facie nas hipóteses em que estiver relacionado a um tema de interesse público, tendo em vista a ocorrência de duas premisssas existentes nesses casos: a do direito que a sociedade tem de saber a respeito dos assuntos de interesse público e a do dever que a imprensa tem de informar a respeito desses assuntos. Firmada a tese da preferencialidade prima facie da liberdade de expressão em temas que envolvem assuntos de interesse público, torna-se necessário dar mais um passo e analisar como essa preferencialidade se consubstanciará no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. A respeito, pode se afirmar que a materialização dessa preferencialidade prima facie da liberdade de expressão ocorrerá com a importação, para o ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, das teorias da actual malice e reportagem neutra (teorias provindas dos Estados Unidos) e privilégios de defesa Reynolds (Inglaterra) e Lange (Austrália). Com a aplicação dessas teorias no Brasil, alguns bons standards poderão ser traçados para orientar o intérprete no momento de solucionar eventuais conflitos entre os direitos fundamentais à liberdade de expressão e de personalidade, garantindo-se, assim, uma aplicação efetiva dos direitos em confilto e uma estrita observância do ideal democrático traçado pelo Constituinte originário. Aplicar a tese da preferencialidade prima facie da liberdade de expressão em sentido amplo significa apenas autorizar que a balança da ponderação, ao iniciar o procedimento ponderativo, confira maior peso inicial à liberdade de expressão, sendo perfeitamente admissível a inversão dos pesos inicialmente atribuídos aos direitos fundamentais em conflito a partir das circunstâncias do caso concreto. / In a Democratic State of Law, the fundamental right to freedom of speech should be treated unequally, being capable of sharing a status of a prima facie preferential fundamental right in cases in which it is related to a subject of public interest, considering the occurrence of two premises on such cases: the right that society has to know about matters of public interest and the duty of the press to inform about these matters. Once established the theory of prima facie preferentiality for freedom of speech on issues involving matters of public interest, it is necessary to go one step further and examine how this preference will be manifested in the Brazilian legal system. Concerning this matter, it can be stated that the embodiment of this prima facie preferentiality of freedom of speech will occur with the importation, into the Brazilian legal system, of the current theories of actual malice and neutral reportage (theories stemmed from the United States) and Reynolds (England ) and Lange (Australia) privileges of defense. By applying these theories in Brazil, some good standards can be traced to guide the interpreter when solving possible conflicts between the fundamental rights of freedom of speech and personality, ensuring, thus, an effective application of these conflicting rights and a strict observance of the democratic ideal outlined by the originating Constituent. Applying the theory of prima facie preferentiality of freedom of speech in a broad sense only means allowing that the balancing scale, when initiating its balancing procedure, provides a greater initial weight to freedom of speech, the reversion of the weights initially assigned to the conflicting fundamental rights from the circumstances of the concrete case being perfectly acceptable.

L’attribution d’une compétence d'incrimination à l’Union soulève les questions complexes qui sont traditionnellement rattachées au pouvoir pénal, notamment celle de la promotion, par les choix d’incrimination d’une conscience collective et de l’expression des valeurs essentielles à une société. En l’occurrence, c’est la question d’une identité européenne. Le projet d’intégration pénale s’est développé très rapidement depuis les trente dernières années sans qu’une réflexion approfondie sur la légitimité d’une telle évolution ne soit menée. Son caractère expérimental a souvent été considéré comme une illustration de la banalisation de la réponse pénale, qu’il s’agisse d’apporter une réponse à des violations suscitant une forte alarme sociale ou de viser à rendre efficace une législation technique. L’absence de politique pénale européenne fait craindre une intervention de l’Union méconnaissant les exigences liées à l’intervention pénale dans un État de droit que sont le respect de la personne et surtout le principe de l’ultima ratio. / The attribution of a criminalisation competence to the Union raises complex questions traditionally attached to the criminal law power, particularly the one of promotion through criminalisation choices of a collective conscience and the expression of values essential to the society. It is the question of a European identity. The penal integration project has developed very rapidly the last thirty years without any deep reflection on the legitimacy of this evolution. Its experimental character is often considered as an illustration of the banalisation of the criminal sanction, being it in order to respond to violations rising a high social alarm or in order to give effectivity to a technical legislation. The absence of criminal policy creates the fear of a European intervention not respecting the requirement attached to the resorting to criminal law in a State under the Rule of Law that are the respect of the person and mostly the principle of ultima ratio

[pt] O presente trabalho trata do direito à saúde da pessoa idosa nos ambientes público e privado. Partindo da premissa de que o direito à saúde possui natureza prioritária na terceira idade procura-se identificar quais são as peculiaridades desse direito quando prestado ao ser idoso. De início, cuida-se da vulnerabilidade jurídica do idoso a fim de justificar vários direitos que, constitucionalmente e infraconstitucionalmente, lhe são atribuídos de maneira prioritária e que corroboram para o alcance da sua saúde ideal. Observam-se dispositivos constitucionais que fazem referência ao idoso e se propõe que o dever de ampará-lo, extraído da Constituição da República brasileira de 1988, seja tratado como direito fundamental material, na medida em que não consta do catálogo formal dos direitos fundamentais. Em nível infraconstitucional analisam-se conteúdos normativos do Estatuto do Idoso - a partir do qual se constrói o princípio do melhor interesse do idoso - e do Código Civil Brasileiro em pontos específicos referentes aos direitos dos idosos. Defende-se que a saúde da pessoa idosa prestada pelo Estado constitui direito constitucional de índole fundamental. Estudam-se as teorias da reserva do possível e do mínimo existencial. Aponta-se para como o Sistema Único de Saúde deve fornecer aos idosos o direito à saúde. Defende-se também a incidência horizontal da undamentalidade do direito à saúde prestado pela iniciativa privada e do consequente intervencionismo estatal na seara dos contratos de plano de saúde, por meio da revisão contratual e da aplicação dos princípios da função social do contrato e da boa-fé objetiva nos pactos celebrados entre idosos e prestadoras privadas de saúde. Ao final, examinam-se instrumentos que viabilizam a eficácia na prestação do direito à saúde à pessoa idosa com a devida prioridade, passíveis de desenvolvimento somente num estado democrático que esteja calcado nos direitos fundamentais da liberdade, da igualdade e da solidariedade e no princípio constitucional da dignidade da pessoa humana. / [en] The present work deals with the rights for health for the elderly in the public as well as private environments. Starting from the premise that the rights to health has priority nature, when the third age is concerned, one tries to identify what are the peculiarities of these rights when it is given to the elderly. In the beginning, one considers the legal vulnerability of the elderly in order to justify several rights that are attributed constitutionally and hierarchically below the constitution to them in a priority way that enable them to accomplish their ideal health. The constitutional mechanisms that refer to the elderly and proposes that the rights to support them, taken from the Brazilian Constitution from 1988, is treated as material of fundamental rights, once it does not come from the formal catalog of fundamental rights. At the level of the law that are hierarchically below the constitution, the normative contents from the Elderly Decree - from where the principle of best interest of the elderly is built - were analyzed together with the Brazilian Civil Code where the elderly rights were referred to in specific points. What is defended in this thesis is that the health of the elderly given by the State constitutes constitutional rights of fundamental nature. The theories of the possible reserve and the minimum existence are studied. The Sistema Único de Saúde - the public health system, is required to supply the rights for health to the elderly. The horizontal incidence of the basis of the rights to health supported by the private companies and the consequent state intervention where the contracts for health care plans are concerned is defended through contract review and applications of principles of the social function of the contract and the objective good faith in the pacts done between the elderly and the private health companies.At the end, the tools that enable the efficiency when the rights to health for the elderly is concerned are examined with the due priority, susceptible to development only in a democratic state which is based on the fundamental rights of freedom, equality, solidarity as well as in the constitutional principle of human being dignity.

This study analyzes the guardianship role on entrepreneurial freedom fundamental rights, non- discrimination in economic and property aspects exerted by the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers Commission from the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and IntellectualProperty (Indecopi) developed throughout resolutions and administrative cases set up by the Defense of Competition Chamber #1. This role is particularly relevant in our legal system, due to their special functions the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers Commission is entitled by legal mandate to establish the non- application of rules in specific cases exercising legal control. This administrative function- initially misunderstood-has proved to be an efficient tool for the guardianship of economic rights due to our judicial system ineffectiveness in contentious administrative matters. The author considers the possibility of making a constitutional reform in order to provide specialized administrative bodies, such as INDECOPI, with the quality of “primary administrative jurisdiction” whose resolutions will only be reviewed by the State Council jurisdiction. / En el presente estudio se analiza el rol de tutela de los derechos fundamentales de libertad de empresa, no discriminación económica y de propiedad ejercido por la Comisión de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas del Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual —Indecopi—, que se ha desarrollado a través de sus resoluciones y de los precedentes administrativos establecidos por la Sala de Defensa de la Competencia 1. Este rol de tutela es muy relevante en nuestro sistema jurídico, en el cual,por su especialidad funcional, la Comisión de Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas está habilitada por mandato legal para la inaplicación de normas en casos concretos en ejercicio del control de legalidad. Esta función administrativa —que en sus inicios fue incomprendida— ha resultado una herramienta eficaz para la tutela de los derechos económicos del administrado en razón de la inoperancia del sistema judicialista en locontencioso administrativo en el Perú. El autor considera que debe estudiarse la posibilidad de reformar la Constitución para atribuir a ciertos órganos administrativos especializados, como los del Indecopi, la calidad de jurisdicción administrativa primaria, cuyas resoluciones solo serán revisables por la jurisdicción de un Consejo deEstado.

What is the element in which human rights arebased? What is it that holds the set of rights that belong  to  every human being for the only fact of being such? Confronted with this questions, several different answers have been formulated. In the present, the position in doctrine that statesthat dignity should be the foundation of humanrights is the preferred.In this article, the author presents an alternative answer to these questions. He proposes the “basic human necessities” as the element in which human rights are founded. In order  to  achieve this, he criticizes the aforementioned position, and introduces arguments in favor of the one he defends. / ¿Cuál es el fundamento de los derechos huma-nos? ¿Qué es aquello que sostiene al conjunto de derechos inherentes a todo ser humano por susola condición de tal? Frente a estas preguntas sehan sostenido distintas respuestas. En la actua-lidad, prima en la doctrina la posición de que la dignidad debe ser el fundamento de los derechoshumanos.En el presente artículo, el autor nos plantea una respuesta alternativa a estas preguntas. Propone a las “necesidades humanas básicas” como fundamento de los derechos humanos. Para ello, critica a la posición anteriormente mencionada y plantea argumentos a favor de aquella que él sostiene.

This article explains when a judicial process starts, involving the exercise of fundamental procedural rights under the theory that is handled. Analyzing the current Peruvian legislation allows the author to conclude what concept or theory has chosen our Procedural Code. recognizing when the process starts, it is also mentioned that judicial protection must be even before any process. / El presente artículo explica cuando inicia un proceso judicial que supone el ejercicio de derechos fundamentales procesales según la teoría que se maneje. realizando un análisis de la actual legislación peruana, le permite concluir al autor cual es la concepción o teoría que nuestro Código Procesal ha optado. reconociendo cuando se entiende iniciado el proceso, se manifiesta que la tutela jurisdiccional debe ser incluso previa a dicho inicio.

Essa tese investiga a possibilidade de democratização da relação de emprego em virtude da participação dos trabalhadores na gestão da empresa, direito fundamental reconhecido no inciso XI do artigo 7º da Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. A participação dos empregados no processo deliberativo empresarial pode ocorrer por meio de direito à informação, direito à consulta ou cogestão. Independentemente do tipo adotado, a existência de um comportamento ativo pelos empregados em âmbito empresarial denota o exercício da cidadania no campo laboral, refletindo, nas relações trabalhistas, a relação de poder que plasma a sociedade em que a atividade empresarial está inserida. No caso do Brasil, a consolidação de práticas democráticas na seara trabalhista tem o condão de reafirmar o processo de democratização pelo qual o país passa desde o fim do regime militar. A despeito da previsão constitucional, observa-se que o legislador infraconstitucional não concretizou o direito à participação dos trabalhadores na gestão empresarial. Considerando-se, entretanto, que a garantia constitucional está prevista no capítulo de direitos sociais, contido no título atinente aos direitos e garantias fundamentais, analisa-se a efetividade das normas do Texto Maior, especialmente aquelas caracterizadas por serem essencialmente vinculadas à dignidade da pessoa humana. Diante de tal situação, o presente estudo, após investigar questões relativas à natureza do poder diretivo exercido no campo empresarial, aspectos ligados às experiências brasileira e estrangeira no que toca à representação e participação dos trabalhadores na gestão empresarial, demonstra a imprescindibilidade da efetivação do direito previsto no inciso XI do artigo 7º da Constituição da República, mesmo que seja por meio de atuação judicial. Assim, concretiza-se, com a utilização do mandado de injunção, um direito fundamental previsto constitucionalmente, aprofundando a experiência democrática em uma das principais organizações sociais: a empresa. / This thesis investigates the possibility of democratization of employment relationship by the workers\' participation in the company management, fundamental right recognized on item XI of the article 7 of the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. The employees\' participation in the corporate deliberative process can occur by means of the right to information, to consultation or co-participation. Regardless of the adopted model, the existence of an active behaviour by employees on the corporate scope denotes the exercise of citizenship within the labor field, reflecting, in labor relations, the relation of power that shapes the society in which business activity is inserted. In the case of Brazil, the consolidation of democratic practices in the labour field has the effect of reaffirming the democratization process by which the country is undergoing since the end of the military regime. Despite the constitutional provision, it is observed that the infraconstitutional legislator did not materialize the workers\' right to participate in corporate management. Considering, however, that the constitutional guarantee is provided in the chapter on social rights, inserted in the title of rights and fundamental guarantees, effectiveness in the rules of the Constitution is analyzed, especially those characterized as being essentially linked to the dignity of the person human. Faced with this situation, the present study, after investigating issues concerning the nature of the governing power exercised in the business field, aspects related to Brazilian and foreign as regards the representation and participation of workers in corporate management, demonstrates the indispensability of the realization of the right provided in item XI of article 7 of the Constitution, even if it is through legal action. Thus, using the writ of injuction, is achieved a fundamental right provided constitutionally, deepening the democratic experience in one of the main social organizations: the company.