La résilience peut être définie comme une adaptation réussie en dépit du risque et de l’adversité. Que serait aujourd’hui le fonctionnement du secteur de l’économie numérique ou bien celui des travaux publics sans la certitude que les réseaux et les infrastructures véhiculant les services qu’ils offrent sont susceptibles de faire face à toutes les agressions extérieures dont ils peuvent être l’objet ? Et comment pourrait-on l’affirmer si l’on n’avait pris toutes les précautions qu’une telle situation requière dans les contrats qui ont permis leur édification ? Tel est l’objet de la présente thèse : montrer que le contrat administratif est « résilient » au sens où il fait face aux aléas qui peuvent l’affecter, s’y adapte, y résiste, les anticipe et mieux, les intègre. L’originalité du contrat administratif repose notamment sur l’existence d’un certain nombre de principes d’ordre public et de mécanismes juridiques permettant à ce dernier de répondre à l’aléa et d’assurer ainsi sa stabilité face à la contingence. Ainsi les deux premiers critères de la résilience paraissent satisfaits : l’adaptation et la résistance à l’aléa. Or l’évolution du contexte dans lequel se trouvent conclus les contrats administratifs ainsi que l’influence des principes fondamentaux relevant de l’ordre public concurrentiel révèlent l’insuffisance de ces mécanismes. Sans que ces derniers ne disparaissent pour autant, de nouvelles solutions complémentaires des premières ont donc dû être développées. La prévention se trouve alors progressivement placée au cœur du contrat administratif. Elle y dévoile la présence des deux autres critères de la résilience à savoir l’anticipation et l’assimilation de l’aléa. Ainsi la satisfaction des quatre critères de la résilience par le contrat administratif semble non seulement faire émerger un nouveau concept de « contrat administratif résilient », mais participe aussi à faire de ce dernier un contrat plus sûr et moins singulier. / Resilience can be defined as the ability to successfully adapt to changing conditions despite risks and adversity. How would function the digital economy and the public works sector today, if we were not sure that the networks and the infrastructures which provide their services are able to face any potential external attack? And how could we be sure of this, if we had not taken all the precautions required by such a situation in the contracts that have enable to build them? The purpose of the present work is precisely to show that the administrative contract is "resilient", in the sense that it is able to deal with the vagaries that may affect it, to adapt to them, to resist to them, to anticipate them, and even better, to incorporate them. What particularly makes the originality of the administrative contract is the existence of a number of principles of public order and legal mechanisms, which enable it both to handle any vagary and to remain stable when faced to contingency. Thus, the first two criteria for resilience: the adaptation and the resistence to vagaries, seem to be met. The evolution of the context in which administrative contracts are signed, as well as the influence of the basic principles of competitive public order, have however shown that these mechanisms seem insufficient. Without making them disappear, new complementary solutions have thus emerged. The notion of prevention has been progressively placed at the heart of administrative contracts. It highlights the presence of two other criteria for resilience: the anticipation and the integration of vagaries. Thus, as the four criteria for resilience are met by administrative contracts, a new concept known as "resilient administrative contract" seems to be emerging, which contributes to make the administrative contract safer and less singular.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Felipe Blanco Garcia Guimaraes Fleury.pdf: 1343341 bytes, checksum: 7fe6474c605c38190ffb1fa5a6253c19 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-10 / It is intended, through this work, investigate administrative violations and sanctions provides in Laws 8.666/93, 10.520/02, 12.462/11 e 12.846/13, applicable to bids and contracts. To achieve this purpose, first we analyze the defining elements of the legal and administrative violation and sanctions, studying its structure, contents and implementation. That done, we studied the aspects and topics related to them of the administrative violations and sanctions. At the end, set these premises, we fixed the content, scope and application of the administrative violations and sanctions provided in these laws, from the interpretation of the rules that form part of its legal system / Pretende-se, por meio deste trabalho, investigar as infrações e sanções administrativas previstas nas Leis 8.666/93, 10.520/02, 12.462/11 e 12.846/13, aplicáveis às licitações e contratos administrativos. Para tanto, primeiramente nos debruçamos sobre os elementos definidores das infrações e sanções jurídicas e administrativas, estudando a sua estrutura, o seu conteúdo e sua aplicação. E, ao assim proceder, aprofundamos o estudo dos ilícitos e penalidades administrativas, enfrentando cada um dos seus aspectos e os temas a eles correlatos. Por fim, com amparo nestas balizas, gizamos o conteúdo, alcance e aplicação das infrações e sanções administrativas em espécie, previstas nas Leis de Licitação; do Pregão; do RDC; e de Anticorrupção, a partir da interpretação das normas que integram o seu regime jurídico

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:21:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Fernando Keutenedjian Mady.pdf: 826616 bytes, checksum: 0588af28824a819fba6f6026b9aac8bd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-11-23 / This work aims to demonstrate the possibilities of applying the principle of the social function to administration legal transaction, with its specificities. Justified the need of his scientific study by the fact that, despite it is a constitutional principle implicit, doctrine not gave adequate treatment and ample in the administration legal transaction. The methodology used was to demonstrate and to identify its origin to establish their effects on other areas and their differences with other legal institutions, conceptualize it and at the end, pointing their possible applications in various administrative activities. Was approached with the view that law was executed the exposed in the beginning. This was related to institutes or overlapping as objective good faith, trust in the protection of legitimate public interest and particularly by the Administrator. In preparing this essay, pointed to possible functions to the principle of social function in the legal and administrative business: integrative, interpretive and inhibitory / Almeja-se neste trabalho demonstrar possibilidades de aplicação do princípio da função social aos negócios jurídico-administrativos, com suas especificidades. Justifica-se a necessidade científica de seu estudo pelo fato de que, a despeito de se tratar de um princípio constitucional implícito, não recebeu da doutrina tratamento adequado e amplo na seara dos negócios jurídicos da Administração. A metodologia utilizada foi a de demonstrar e identificar sua origem, estabelecer seus efeitos em outros planos e suas diferenças com outros institutos jurídicos, conceituá-lo e, ao final, apontar suas possíveis aplicações nas diversas atividades administrativas. Foi abordada a visão de Direito com que se executou o exposto no início. Tratou-se de institutos correlatos ou sobrepostos como a boa-fé objetiva, a confiança legítima na tutela do interesse público pelo Administrador e particular. Com elaboração desta dissertação, apontou-se possíveis funções ao princípio da função social nos negócios jurídico-administrativos: integrativa, interpretativa e inibidora

Le contentieux des tiers au contrat a connu depuis la décision Tropic travaux signalisation des changements profonds. Chaque année ou presque est intervenue une évolution, dont la dernière, l’arrêt Département de Tarn-et-Garonne, a ouvert à tous les tiers un recours de pleine juridiction contre le contrat. Cependant, afin de ne pas remettre en cause de manière exagérée la sécurité juridique des parties au contrat, le juge applique de multiples restrictions qui conduisent souvent à l’absence d’annulation du contrat, voire à l’absence de toute sanction.Les présents travaux permettent de dresser un état des lieux du droit positif, en particulier sur le maintien, certes limité, du recours pour excès de pouvoir. Ils envisagent ensuite des améliorations du contentieux des tiers au contrat. Celles-ci passent par une unification des voies de recours. Il est proposé de créer un recours précontractuel ouvert à tous les tiers y ayant un intérêt, et un recours contractuel, dont la recevabilité sera plus limitée. Il est par ailleurs envisagé de généraliser aux nouveaux recours un pouvoir de sanction pécuniaire, aujourd’hui réservé au seul référé contractuel. Ce pouvoir permet en effet de concilier la sécurité juridique des parties et le respect de la légalité pour les tiers au contrat. Il devrait être utilisé pour sanctionner les vices de pure forme, le juge ne disposant pas actuellement de pouvoir adéquat, sans remettre en cause l’acte. / The field of litigation by third parties to contracts has been undergoing major changes since the Tropic travaux signalisation decision was handed down. New developments have occurred almost on a yearly basis – the latest of which, the Département de Tarn-et-Garonne decision, has allowed third parties to fully challenge contracts. At the same time, in an attempt to limit the risks involved for the legal certainty expected by the contracting parties, courts apply multiple restrictive filters, which often results in the contract not being quashed, or even in the absence of any sanction.The paper contains an overview of the current state of applicable rules, with a particular emphasis on the continued - albeit limited - use of the traditional action for misuse of authority (recours pour excès de pouvoir). If then considers possible improvements to litigation by third parties to contracts. These improvements go through a unification of the existing actions. Our proposal is to create a pre-contractual action that would be available to any interested third party, along with a contractual action whose admissibility would be more limited. It is also envisaged to extend to these new actions the power to impose financial penalties that is currently limited to contractual fast-track challenges (référés contractuels). Indeed, this sanction allows a conciliation between the legal certainty expected by the contracting parties and the respect of the principle of legality pursued by third parties. Its use should target mere formal defects, as courts currently lack an adequate power in this case, without setting aside the contracts.

La thèse permet de démontrer que la comptabilité publique constitue un outil de contrôle de l’exécution du contrat administratif. Le droit de la comptabilité budgétaire constitue un outil de contrôle renouvelé de l’exécution du contrat administratif en ce qu’elle conditionne l’exécution financière et matérielle du contrat administratif. La comptabilité générale de l’Etat constitue quant à elle un nouvel outil de contrôle de l’exécution du contrat administratif en ce qu’il s’agit d’un instrument d’analyse financière du contrat administratif. / The thesis makes it possible to demonstrate that public accounting is a tool for monitoring the execution of the administrative contract. The law of budgetary accounting constitutes a tool of renewed control of the execution of the administrative contract in that it conditions the financial and material execution of the administrative contract. The general accounts of the State constitute a new tool for monitoring the execution of the administrative contract in that it is an instrument of financial analysis of the administrative contract.

As relações entre a Administração Pública e os cidadãos modificaram-se radicalmente ao longo das últimas décadas. Essa transformação também se reflete no âmbito do Direito Tributário. A administração tributária tem buscado adotar formas consensuais de prevenção ou solução de conflitos, pois o recurso ao Poder Judiciário demonstramorosidade e o prolongamento das demandas inevitavelmente traduz prejuízos para as partes envolvidas. O presente estudo enfoca o fenômeno dos contratos fiscais, assim entendidos os acordos firmados entre o Fisco e o contribuinte para a solução de problemas controversos envolvidos no processo de apuração e determinação da obrigação tributária. Analisam-se os limites à adoção de formas consensuais em matéria tributária, enfocando seu enquadramento com relação aos princípios da legalidade, tipicidade, igualdade, capacidade contributiva e especialmente da indisponibilidade do crédito tributário. Estudam-se os fenômenos da discricionariedade e concessão de margens de apreciação, uma vez que eles fundamentam a autonomia contratual da Administração Pública. São enfocados exemplos específicos de conceitos indeterminados, cláusulas gerais e outras formas de livre atuação administrativa em Direito Tributário. Considerando que contratos fiscais remete a um gênero, uma categoria superior que congrega diferentes formas de atuação pactuada da Administração Pública, apresenta-se sua conceituação e detalhes das suas características essenciais. São examinadas também as principais teorias para identificação da natureza jurídica específicas dos contratos fiscais, em torno das figuras de contrato ou ato administrativo. Enfocam-se ainda os principais fatores envolvidos na formação de tais contratos, bem como limites para sua revisão e anulação. São ressaltados detalhes específicos do papel da vontade do contribuinte nesse processo. Por último faz-se análise circunstanciadas das características de cinco espécies de contratos fiscais do Direito Tributário Brasileiro: acordos de fixação, regimes de quantificação padronizada dos tributos, soluções de consulta, contratos de isenção e transações em sentido estrito. / The relationship between public administration and citizens have changed radically over the past decades. This transformation is also reflected in the Tax Law. The tax administration has sought to adopt consensual ways of preventing or resolving conflicts, since the recourse to the judiciary demonstrates delays and prolongation of the demands inevitably translates into losses for the parties involved. This study focuses on the phenomenon of tax contracts, understood as the agreements between the IRS and the taxpayer to resolve controversial issues involved in the assessment and calculation of the tax liability. It examines the limits to the adoption of consensus regarding tax forms, focusing its framework with regard to the principles of legality, typicality, equality, ability to pay and especially the unavailability of the tax credit. We study the phenomena of discretion and margins of appreciation, since they underlie the contractual autonomy of the Public Administration. Particular attention is given to specific examples of indeterminate concepts, general clauses and other forms of administrative freedom of action in Tax Law. Whereas tax contracts is an expression that refers to a genre, a higher category that combines different forms of action agreed Public Administration, this study presents its concept and details of their essential characteristics. Also examined are the main theories to identify the specific legal nature of contracts tax, around the figures of contract or administrative act. Focus is still the main factors involved in the formation of such contracts, as well as limits for your review and annulment. It highlights specific details of the role of the will of the taxpayer in this process. Finally this study presents a detailed analysis of the characteristics of five species of contracts of the Brazilian Tax Law: agreements for the fixation of vagueness, contracts for standardized quantification of taxes, tax rulings, exemption contracts and transactions.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:21:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Percival Jose Bariani Junior.pdf: 1364537 bytes, checksum: 5746958da665095a7a34157aa3abe931 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-11-09 / The National Law on Basic Sanitation - (LNSB in Portuguese - Law nº 11.445/07) establishes the national guidelines for basic sanitation, for the federal policy of basic sanitation and, among other activities, disciplines how public supply services for potable water and sanitary depletion should be provided, setting a new model regulared by an appropriate planning on how to provide these services, which has encouraged the use of a concession as a way of implementing them. The two main documents are the basic sanitation plan and the study for technical and financial economic viability which serve as a guide for the structuring of this concession model, since they establish all goals and necessary investments to reach it and, also, define the concessionaire's wages and the deadline for the amortization of the investments. These initial technical and economical parameters set the financial economic balance of the concession, which must be preserved throughout the services provided, since the tariff's periodical readjustments and the ordinary and extraordinary reviews of the contract are the instruments that keep the relation of equivalence for reciprocal obligations between both parts unaltered, in the exact terms disciplined in contract. From the analysis of the juridical regime of public services and elements that compound the financial economic balance of the concession contracts, this paper aims at analysing the mechanisms forseen in the Brazilian infra-constitutional legislation to preserve the balance in the public services concessional contracts for water supply and sanitary depletion, seeking to make the users rights to receive an appropriate service and the concessionaires rights compatible / A Lei Nacional de Saneamento Básico LNSB (Lei nº 11.445/07) estabelece as diretrizes nacionais para o saneamento básico e para a política federal de saneamento básico, e, entre outras atividades, disciplina a forma de prestação dos serviços públicos de abastecimento de água potável e esgotamento sanitário, fixando um novo modelo pautado pelo planejamento, regulação e prestação adequada dos serviços, o que incentivou a utilização da concessão como forma de implementar esses serviços essenciais. O plano de saneamento básico e o estudo de viabilidade técnica e econômico-financeira são os dois principais documentos que servem de norte para a estruturação do modelo da concessão, uma vez que estabelecem as metas e os investimentos necessários para alcançá-las e definem a remuneração do concessionário e o prazo para amortização dos investimentos. Esses parâmetros técnicos e econômicos iniciais compõem o equilíbrio econômico-financeiro da concessão, que deve ser preservado durante toda a prestação dos serviços, sendo que o reajuste periódico das tarifas e as revisões ordinária e extraordinária do contrato são os instrumentos que mantêm inalterada a relação de equivalência entre as obrigações recíprocas assumidas pelas partes, nos exatos termos disciplinados em contrato. Partindo da análise do regime jurídico dos serviços públicos e dos elementos que compõem o equilíbrio econômico-financeiro dos contratos de concessão, o presente trabalho tem por objeto analisar os mecanismos previstos na legislação infraconstitucional brasileira para preservar esse equilíbrio nos contratos de concessão dos serviços públicos de abastecimento de água e esgotamento sanitário, buscando compatibilizar o direito dos usuários de receber um serviço adequado e os direitos do concessionário

nÃo hà / As terceirizaÃÃes de serviÃos representam montantes significativos nas contrataÃÃes pÃblicas, e sÃo essenciais para que a AdministraÃÃo realize suas atividades finalÃsticas, prestaÃÃo de serviÃo pÃblico à sociedade. Desse modo, para garantir que as contrataÃÃes desses serviÃos sejam efetivamente vantajosas e eficientes, a Lei n 8.666/93 estabeleceu que a AdministraÃÃo deve designar servidor para a fiscalizaÃÃo e o acompanhamento das contrataÃÃes pÃblicas. O papel de fiscal de contratos de serviÃos terceirizados com cessÃo de mÃo de obra, no entanto, exige amplos conhecimentos do servidor em relaÃÃo Ãs obrigaÃÃes trabalhistas, previdenciÃrias, fiscais, como tambÃm informaÃÃes precisas sobre contrato administrativo, pois, do contrÃrio, o fiscal poderà nÃo realizar uma fiscalizaÃÃo eficiente, bem como nÃo cumprir com as determinaÃÃes normativas, a exemplo da InstruÃÃo Normativa n 02/2008/SLTI/MPOG. Este estudo, de carÃter qualitativo-quantitativo, com abordagem exploratÃria e descritiva, tem como objetivo geral apresentar uma anÃlise comparativa do grau de execuÃÃo das atividades de fiscalizaÃÃo e do nÃvel de importÃncia atribuÃdo pelos servidores fiscais à atividade de fiscalizaÃÃo de contratos de terceirizaÃÃo em uma IFES. A abordagem teÃrica està baseada em conceitos de contratos administrativos, suas caracterÃsticas e principais modalidades, assim como noÃÃes gerais sobre fiscalizaÃÃo de contratos, as atividades de fiscalizaÃÃo e a responsabilidade da AdministraÃÃo e dos fiscais. Como meio de coleta de dados, foi utilizado um questionÃrio elaborado em Escala de Likert, que identifica oito fatores relacionados Ãs atividades de fiscalizaÃÃo de contratos de serviÃos terceirizados com cessÃo de mÃo de obra, o qual foi aplicado aos servidores fiscais de serviÃos terceirizados da IFES em estudo. Para as anÃlises dos dados quantitativos e interpretaÃÃes dos resultados, foram aplicados mÃtodos clÃssicos de EstatÃstica Descritiva, enquanto para os dados qualitativos, foi realizada uma anÃlise interpretativa do relato dos fiscais. Os resultados obtidos revelam que as principais fragilidades da fiscalizaÃÃo correspondem Ãs atividades do primeiro mÃs de prestaÃÃo dos serviÃos e Ãs atividades quando da extinÃÃo do contrato. Atrelada a isso, està a necessidade de capacitaÃÃo dos fiscais, e tambÃm de aumentar o nÃmero de servidores designados para o papel de fiscal. Conclui-se, portanto, que a AdministraÃÃo precisa melhorar as condiÃÃes de trabalho dos fiscais e buscar meios de qualificÃ-los e treinÃ-los para a realizaÃÃo de fiscalizaÃÃes mais eficientes e em conformidade com a legislaÃÃo vigente. / Outsourcing services represent significant amounts in public contracting, and are essential for the Administration to carry out its final activities, providing public service to society. Thus, in order to ensure that the contracting of these services is effectively advantageous and efficient, Law 8.666/93 established that the Administration should designate a public server for the supervision and monitoring of public contracting. In the meantime, the role of prosecutor for outsourced contracts with labor assignment requires extensive knowledge of the server in relation to labor, social security and tax obligations, as well as knowledge of administrative contract, otherwise the public prosecutor may not perform an efficient, as well as not complying with normative determinations, such as Normative Ruling 02/2008/SLTI/MPOG. This qualitative-quantitative study, with an exploratory and descriptive approach, has as a general objective to present a comparative analysis of the degree of execution of the surveillance activities and the degree of importance assigned by the fiscal to the activity of surveillance of outsourcing contracts in a IFES. The theoretical approach is based on concepts of administrative contracts, their characteristics and main modalities, general notions about surveillance of contracts, surveillance activities and the responsibility of the Administration and the fiscal. As a data collection tool, a questionnaire elaborated on a Likert Scale was used, which identifies eight factors related to the surveillance activities of outsourced services contracts with assignment of labor, which was applied to outsourced fiscal servers of IFES in study. For the analysis of the quantitative data and interpretations of the results, classic methods of Descriptive Statistics were applied, already for the qualitative data, an interpretative analysis of the report of the fiscal servers was carried out. The results show that the main fragilities of the surveillance correspond to the activities of the first month of services rendered and to the activities when the contract expires. Linked to this is the need for fiscal qualification, and also to increase the number of servers assigned to the fiscal role. It is concluded, therefore, that the Administration needs to improve the conditions of work of the fiscal servers and to find ways to qualify and train these fiscal to carry out more efficient inspections and in compliance with the current legislation.

Si le droit administratif colombien se fonde sur les mêmes principes que le droit administratif français, l’interdiction de l’arbitrage aux personnes morales de droit public n’a pas été reprise en Colombie. La jurisprudence a admis l’application de l’arbitrage aux contrats publics même en l’absence d’autorisation législative. Le principe de légalité, la continuité du service public et le respect de l’intérêt public fondent le droit des contrats publics. Cependant, celui-ci se développe sous l’égide du droit commun des obligations et des contrats et il partage les aspects essentiels du droit de l’arbitrage : l’autonomie de la volonté et la liberté contractuelle. Si le droit colombien n’impose aucune limite à l’arbitrage des contrats publics depuis 1993 alors que les lois antérieures en fixaient, cette évolution législative peut-elle être interprétée comme l’octroi de compétences équivalentes aux arbitres et au juge administratif ? Le régime du droit commun de l’arbitrage s’adapte-t-il aux besoins du contentieux des contrats publics ? Quelle est la portée de ce changement pour l’arbitrage international des contrats publics ? Au-delà des contradictions apparentes, les principes des contrats publics n’entrent pas en confrontation avec les notions essentielles à l’arbitrage. La compétence des arbitres se limite aux contentieux subjectifs des contrats publics. La jurisprudence forgée en la matière depuis 1964 s’est consolidée au fil du temps, nous permettant d’évaluer l’efficacité et l’effectivité de l’arbitrage des contrats publics. / Even though Colombian and French administrative law are grounded on the same principles, Colombian administrative law did not adopt the stance that public legal bodies are prevented from agreeing arbitration clauses and submitting their disputes to arbitration. Colombian case law has recognized arbitration clauses in relation to disputes arising out of public contracts, even when there is no specific legal authorization to do so. The principle of the rule of law, the continuity of the provision of public services, the public interest and the existence of a specialized administrative jurisdiction, are the foundations of public contract law. Nevertheless, public contract law is implemented under the aegis of contract law and it shares essential aspects of arbitration law: the autonomy of the parties free will and freedom of contract. Since 1993, Colombian law has not imposed any limit on the arbitration of disputes arising out of public contracts, even if former laws did so. Could this legal progress be construed as granting similar jurisdiction to arbitrators and administrative judges? Is general arbitration law suitable for the needs of the settlement of disputes arising out of public contracts? What is the scope of this change for the international arbitration of disputes arising out of public contracts? Despite the apparent contradictions, the essential tenets of public contracts, do not conflict with the key components of arbitration. The jurisdiction of arbitrators is confined to “contentieux subjectifs”. Colombian case law has developed since 1964 and has been consolidated over time, allowing us to evaluate to what extent the arbitration of disputes arising out of public contracts is an effective and efficient tool for public administration.

La théorie des prérogatives de contrat administratif transplantée du droit administratif français a invoqué un débat de longue période dans la communauté judiciaire qu’une législation nationale unifiée a toujours été absente même aujourd’hui. En fait, dans le droit administratif français lié qui se compose principalement par la jurisprudence dans ce domaine, il y a non seulement une série de conditions préalables pour réaliser chaque prérogative, mais aussi un mécanisme de protection qui maintient un équilibre financier du contrat pour la justice finale. Or, sur la base d’une préférence pour les pouvoirs publics enracinée dans les traditions juridiques et le régime politique de la Chine, combinés certaines situations actuelles contemporaines, les chercheurs chinois ont partiellement mis en évidence la première, mais ignoré la seconde, conduisant à l’échec de cette transplantation juridique. En fait, comme une sorte de pouvoir administratif, la prérogative ne doit pas être considérée dans le propre système de contrat qui se compose par les droits et obligations consensuels, mais se réfère à la compétence légale de l’administration qui doit être contrôlée par la responsabilité légale. De plus, cela peut s’interpréter aussi comme la rupture de contrat, de sorte que l’administrateur doive prendre la responsabilité contractuelle fondée sur la théorie de la responsabilité sans faute, la relativité de contrat et la force de contrat, au lieu de la Légalité au sens étroit; la responsabilité administrative dans ce domaine devrait par conséquent être attribuée à la rupture de contrat, à l’endommagement et à l’illégalité. Peu importe quel modèle serait suivi par la législation à l’avenir, un système judiciaire indépendant et influant dans la pratique sociale sera la protection ultime de tous les systèmes juridiques incluant le contrat administratif en Chine. / The theory of prerogatives of administrative contract transplanted from the French administrative law has triggered such a longtime debate in the judicial community that a unified national legislation has been absent even today. Actually, in the French administrative law, composed mainly by Case Law in this domain, there is not only a series of conditions to enforce each prerogative, but also a protective mechanism to keep a financial balance of contract for the final justice. However, based on a preference to the Power rooted from the legal traditions and the political regime of China, combined with certain contemporary facts, Chinese researchers have partially highlighted the former but ignored the latter, leading to the failure of this legal transplant. Actually, as a type of administrative power, the prerogative should not be considered into the proper system of contract composed by the conventional rights and obligations, but refers to the legal authority of administration that should be controlled by the legal responsibility. In addition, it could be considered as the breach of contract too, so that the administrator should take the contractual responsibility based on the Theory of no-fault, on the Relativity of contract and on the Force effect of contract; thus the administrative responsibility hereof could be assumed for the breach of contract, for the quasi-tort out of contract and for the illegality. No matter which pattern would be followed by the future legislation in China, an independent and influential judicial system should be the final protection of all legal systems including the administrative contract.