Honor-related violence and oppression are societal issues that are relevant to social work. However, it is an under-researched area with a lack of knowledge, especially regarding boys and young men in an honor context. The existing research primarily focuses on girls and women. The aim of this study was to describe the content of public publications regarding social work on honor-related violence and oppression in relation to boys and young men. The focus was to examine how boys and young men in an honor context are described as both victims and perpetrators. In addition to that, the study also aimed to investigate the interventions available for this target group. Thematic content analysis was used to address the research questions and objectives by analyzing and thematizing the content of public publications. The findings of this study indicate that boys and young men exist in dual roles as both victims and perpetrators, but more emphasis is often placed on their role as perpetrators rather than victims, as girls' and women's victimization is considered more extensive. Furthermore, the study suggests that there are few interventions specifically targeted at boys and young men living in an honor context. The available interventions mainly focus on victims. The results have been analyzed using power theory and street-levelbureaucracy theory. The analysis demonstrates that power is a central aspect in both an honor context and the practice of social work, and that the structure of street-level bureaucracy affects work with this target group. Therefore, this study concludes that more knowledge and work are needed regarding boys and young men in an honor context.

Master Thesis Proposal Institute of Political Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University of Prague Supervisor: Bela Plechanovova E-mail: bela.plechanovova@fsv.cuni.cz Phone: Defense date: Author: Tala Salem E-mail: talena1703@gmail.com Phone: +420776100311 Specialization: MAIN THESIS TOPIC: HONOR KILLING OF PALESTINIAN WOMEN - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION: In my research, I'll be studying the reasons and motives that lead to honor killings in Palestine. Such acts are carried out against women whose actions are deemed unacceptable or outright taboo by the general community, or maybe by just the family members.The work shall be looking at whether honor killings are strongly correlated to social and religious reasons. As well as this, I'll also be studying what countermeasures the women can possibly take up from their end to face this issue, and also how the judicial system deals with honor killings. Research question: What are the underlying motives for honor killings in the Palestinian communities? How can we hope to find a solution to this atrocity? Literature survey: A) Scholarly: Some of the major sources I shall be utilizing for my thesis work are mentioned underneath. These works certainly assist in laying some solid groundwork to the overall topic being discussed here....

En el presente informe se analizan los aspectos más relevantes del proceso de impugnación de despido fraudulento iniciado por el señor Williams Guerra Rodriguez (en adelante, “el señor Guerra Rodríguez” o “el trabajador”) contra Tiendas por Departamento Ripley (en adelante, “RIPLEY”). En particular, si es válido despedir a un trabajador imputándole la falta grave de injuria y faltamiento de palabra por comentarios que realizó en perfiles públicos de Facebook. Aterrizando este aspecto en el caso en concreto, los principales problemas jurídicos que se buscan absolver son si el señor Williams Guerra Rodriguez incurrió en la mencionada falta grave y, si los hechos que realizó configuraban un delito contra el honor. Teniendo en cuenta lo expuesto, tras la revisión y estudio de las normas laborales y penales vigentes así como la jurisprudencia emitida en estas materias, se llegó a la conclusión de que: (i) el despido del trabajador es válido porque efectuó comentarios injuriantes y ofensivos contra representantes y trabajadores de la Empresa, así como su empleador; y, (ii) que por el contenido ofensivo de los comentarios que difundió en el medio de comunicación social Facebook, el trabajador incurrió en el delito de difamación agravada.

Hedersrelaterat våld och förtryck är ett omfattande samhällsproblem som Socialtjänsten behöver hantera. Det kännetecknas med stor komplexitet som kräver djupare förståelse av problematiken för att kunna erbjuda relevanta insatser. Det vanligaste beslutet hos Socialtjänsten vid ärenden som är kopplat till hedersrelaterat våld är att individen ska erbjudas skyddat boende för att bli av med våldet direkt. I detta examensarbete undersöks personalens perspektiv på insatsen skyddat boende. Syftet är att belysas skyddat boendes personal erfarenheter och upplevelser av klienter som var utsatta för hedersförtryck. Examensarbetet utgår från tre punkter – den första är personalens uppfattning av hedersproblematiken och skyddade boende. Den andra är fördelarna och nackdelarna med en placering på skyddat boende och sista är samarbetet mellan Socialtjänsten och skyddade boendet. Resultatet visar att personalen har betydande kunskap om hedersproblematiken vilket möjliggör ett individuellt förhållningssätt till att arbeta med klienterna. Vidare pekar resultatet på att personalen identifierar fördelarna samt nackdelarna som uppstår för klienterna på skyddat boende. Sist konstateras ett bra samarbete mellan personalen och Socialtjänsten dock finns det flera områden som kräver förbättring och utveckling. Genomförandet av examensarbetet sker med hjälp av flera teorier, till exempel gräsrotsbyråkratens teori, intersektionalitets teorin, teorin om kön och genus samt teorin om makt. / Honor-related violence and oppression is an extensive social problem that Social Services needs to deal with. It is characterized by great complexity that requires a deep understanding of the problem in order to offer relevant interventions. The most common decision by the Social Services in cases connected to honor-related violence is that the individual is offered sheltered accommodation in order to get rid of the violence immediately. In this degree project, the staff's perspective on the sheltered housing initiative is examined. The aim is to shed light on the experience of protected accommodation staff and the experience of clients who were exposed to honor oppression. The thesis is based on three points - the first is the staff's perception of the honor problem and sheltered accommodation. The second is the advantages and disadvantages of placement in sheltered housing and the last is the cooperation between Social Services and the sheltered housing. The result shows that the staff has significant knowledge of the honor problem, which enables an individual approach to working with the clients. Furthermore, the results indicate that the staff identify the advantages and disadvantages that arise for the clients in the sheltered accommodation. Finally, there is good cooperation between the staff and Social Services, however, there are several areas that require improvement and development. The completion of degree work is done with the help of several theories, for example the theory of grassroots bureaucrats, the theory of intersectionality, the theory of sex and gender and the theory of power.

El presente informe es acerca del expediente de relevancia jurídica E-2650 con contenido en materia penal-laboral, en el que radica su importancia en la investigación y estudio de la “injuria” como acto causal de falta grave con consecuencia de despido, de acuerdo a la legislación laboral; y como acto causal de sanción penal. Asimismo, se analiza la relevancia de las redes sociales como un medio de comunicación el cual se pueda utilizar para lesionar el derecho al honor, en un contexto social en el que las relaciones digitales se abren paso dentro de un vacío jurisprudencial para dicho tipos de casos. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del presente informe radica en desarrollar los derechos que se presentan a lo largo del proceso, tales como: derecho al honor, derecho a la debida motivación de las resoluciones judiciales, derecho a un debido proceso y todo lo que ello implica; de manera que pueda resolverse el problema principal que concierne al caso el cual es: si se puede configurar como falta grave laboral las publicaciones “injuriantes” que se realicen a través de las redes sociales. Llegando finalmente a concluir que en el presente caso sí se habría configurado la falta grave laboral por parte de demandante, vulnerando el derecho al honor de las personas, al haber injuriado de forma agravante a los directivos de RIPLEY, siendo Facebook un medio de comunicación masivo. Asimismo, se tiene en consideración el derecho penal como de ultima ratio y el derecho que dictará los lineamientos sobre conceptos jurídicos que puedan contener otras ramas del derecho por la importante razón de proteger intereses jurídicos de interés público.

El presente trabajo de investigación tiene como propósito analizar de qué modo se puede determinar la proporcionalidad del despido como límite a la libertad de expresión en el caso de los trabajadores sindicalizados, a propósito de la aplicación de la causal de despido justificado por falta grave contenida en el artículo 25 literal f) de la Ley de Productividad y Competitividad Laboral (en adelante, “LPCL”) por comentarios o publicaciones realizadas en redes sociales. Como resultado de tal estudio, se llegará a la conclusión de que, en el caso antes expuesto, será necesario la aplicación de un test de ponderación que permita valorar la idoneidad, necesidad y proporcionalidad del despido para restringir la libertad de expresión de trabajadores sindicalizados y garantizar la protección del derecho al honor del empleador, sus representantes, personal jerárquico o de otros trabajadores. No obstante, antes de llegar a dicho análisis, y dado que el caso estudiado presenta como contexto la realización de comentarios presuntamente injuriantes en redes sociales, se tendrá que determinar, previamente, si existe o no afectación al derecho a la intimidad de los trabajadores al utilizar el contenido subido a redes sociales como sustento de un despido. Ello nos llevará a analizar los límites de la facultad fiscalizadora del empleador en el ámbito de las redes sociales. Posteriormente realizaremos un análisis del derecho a la libertad de expresión, como se desarrolla en el ámbito de las relaciones colectivas de trabajo y qué limites presenta. Finalmente, realizaremos un test de ponderación considerando los hechos de la Laboral N° 19856-2016-Lima Este, analizando la idoneidad, la necesidad y proporcionalidad del despido como límite al derecho a la libertad de expresión de los trabajadores sindicalizados. En dicho análisis tomaremos en cuenta también el ámbito de protección del derecho al honor a efectos de determinar si existió o no, en el caso, un uso ilegítimo del derecho a la libertad de expresión. / The purpose of this research work is to analyze how the proportionality of dismissal can be determined as a limit to freedom of expression in the case of unionized workers, regarding the application of the grounds for dismissal justified by serious misconduct contained in article 25 literal f) of the Labor Productivity and Competitiveness Law (hereinafter, “LPCL”) for comments or publications made on social networks. As a result of such a study, it will be concluded that, in the aforementioned case, it will be necessary to apply a weighting test that allows assessing the suitability, necessity and proportionality of the dismissal to restrict the freedom of expression of unionized workers and guarantee the protection of the right to honor of the employer, its representatives, hierarchical personnel or other workers. However, before reaching said analysis, and given that the case studied presents as a context the making of presumably insulting comments on social networks, it will have to be determined, previously, whether or not there is an infringement of the right to privacy of workers at the use the content uploaded to social networks as support for a dismissal. This will lead us to analyze the limits of the supervisory power of the employer in the field of social networks. Later we will carry out an analysis of the right to freedom of expression, how it is developed in the field of collective labor relations and what limits it presents. Finally, we will carry out a weighting test considering the facts of Labor N° 19856-2016-Lima Este, analyzing the suitability, necessity and proportionality of dismissal as a limit to the right to freedom of expression of unionized workers. In said analysis we will also take into account the scope of protection of the right to honor in order to determine whether or not there was, in the case, an illegitimate use of the right to freedom of expression.

Syftet med den här kvalitativa studien har varit att undersöka hur socialsekreterare upplevermöjligheten till familjebehandling i familjer där hedersrelaterat våld och förtryck (HRV)förekommer. Halvstrukturerade intervjuer genomfördes med yrkesverksammasocialsekreterare eller socionomer, som under de fem senaste åren arbetat somsocialsekreterare. Studiens teoretiska ram bestod av begreppen orientalism, essentialism,konstruktivism och ett intersektionellt perspektiv. Resultatet visar att socialsekreterarnaupplever möjligheten till familjebehandling, i dessa kontexter, som begränsad.Intervjupersonerna beskriver arbetet som komplext där ett förändringsarbete sällan är möjligt,då hedersnormer och kultur beskrivs vara djupt rotade och svåra att förändra.Familjebehandling beskrivs även som en kompletterande insats till mer omfattande insatsersåsom placering utanför hemmet, och anses därför i de flesta fall inte fungera som en isoleradinsats. Utifrån intervjupersonernas beskrivningar kan det tolkas som att synen består av attdet ofta handlar om grovt våld och förtryck, vilket motiverar omfattande och ingripandeåtgärder. En annan faktor till den begränsade möjligheten att bevilja familjebehandling kanutifrån intervjuerna, förstås vara en brist på kunskap och insatser riktade mot dessa familjer.För att motverka HRV kan det utifrån intervjupersonernas utsagor, förstås viktigt att arbetamed förebyggande insatser för att bryta den isolering många familjer upplever. / The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine how social workers perceive thepossibility of family treatment in families experiencing honor-based violence and oppression(HBV). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with social workers, or social workerswho have worked in the field within the past five years. The theoretical framework of thestudy included orientalism, essentialism, constructivism and an intersectional perspective.The results show that social workers perceive the possibility of family treatment in thesecontexts as limited. The interviewees describe the work as complex, where bringing aboutchange is rarely possible as honor-norms and culture are described as deeply rooted anddifficult to alter. Family treatment is also understood as a complementary intervention tomore comprehensive measures such as out-of-home placement and is therefore generally notconsidered effective as a standalone intervention. Based on the interviewees’ descriptions,there is often a motivation to implement more comprehensive and interventionist measuresdue to the severity of the violence and oppression. Another factor contributing to the limitedpossibility of approving family therapy, could be a lack of knowledge and targetedinterventions for these families. To counter HBV, it is important to work on preventivemeasures to break the isolation experienced by families.

[pt] As manifestações de pensamento e opinião passaram a ocorrer de forma mais intensa após o advento da internet, considerando que qualquer pessoa conectada à rede pode realizar uma publicação de mensagem e esta ter difusão e amplitude antes inimaginável - como, por exemplo, enviar um conteúdo para uma ou mais pessoas que estão do outro lado do mundo em tempo real e essa publicação ter visualizações na casa dos milhões. A própria relação empregatícia está sendo impactada nesse aspecto. O direito à liberdade de expressão passou a ser invocado de maneira recorrente por empregados que têm sofrido represálias decorrentes de manifestações na internet. Por outro lado, os empregadores têm como principal respaldo legal para justificar suas atitudes o argumento que essas manifestações lesam sua honra, e, com base no artigo 482, alínea K, da Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho (1943), que expressamente prevê que constitui motivo suficiente para justa causa ato lesivo da honra ou da boa fama ou ofensas físicas praticadas contra o empregador e superiores hierárquicos (...), aplicam a justa causa. Portanto, há claramente colisão de dois direitos garantidos constitucionalmente em uma relação marcada pela subordinação jurídica do empregado ao empregador em virtude do contrato de trabalho. Desse modo, torna-se fundamental entender o que determina a preponderância de um ou outro direito quando estão em colisão, pois a consequência da manifestação neste caso pode ser bem mais gravosa que se fosse feita em uma relação entre comuns: o empregado pode ser dispensado por justa causa, o que elimina não somente o seu sustento a curto prazo, mas também uma série de direitos trabalhistas. Para compreender essa colisão, além da pesquisa doutrinária, investiga-se como a liberdade de expressão do empregado em manifestações na internet tem sido decidida pelos Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da Terceira Região - Minas Gerais (TRT-3), Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da Segunda Região - São Paulo (TRT-2) e Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da Primeira Região - Rio de Janeiro (TRT-1), através de análise dos acórdãos proferidos no período de 01/01/2015 até 31/12/2021. / [en] Manifestations of thought and opinion began to occur more intensely after the advent of the internet, considering that anyone connected to the network can write a message and share to everyone in a way previously unimaginable - for example, nowadays it is possible sending a messagem to one or more people who is on the other side of the world in real time and this publication reached a thousand views quickly. The employment relationship itself is also impacted in this aspect. The right to freedom of expression started to be used as argument by employees who have suffered reprisals as a result of manifestations on the internet. On the other hand, employers justify their attitudes with the answer that these manifestations harm their honor, and, based on article 482, K, of the Consolidation of Labor Laws (1943) in Brazil, which expressly provides that it constitutes sufficient reason to dismiss from the job act harmful to honor or good reputation or physical offenses committed against the employer and hierarchical superiors (...), to dimiss. Therefore, clearly there is a collision of two constitutional rights in a relationship marked by the legal subordination of the employee to the employer by employment contract. In this way, it is essential to understand what determines the preponderance of one or another right when they are in collision, since the consequence of the manifestation in this case can be much more serious than if it were made in a relationship between two common people: the employee can be dismissed for just cause, which eliminates not only their long-term support, but also a series of labor rights. In order to understand this collision, in addition to doctrinal research, it investigates how the employee s freedom of expression in internet demonstrations has been decided by the Regional Labor Court of the Third Region - Minas Gerais (TRT-3), Regional Labor Court of the Second Region - São Paulo (TRT-2) and Regional Labor Court of the First Region - Rio de Janeiro (TRT-1), through analysis of the judgments handed down from 01/01/2015 to 12/31/2021.

No description available.

The aim of this study is to examine how offenders of honor-related violence are portrayed in Swedish prison and probation service educational materials. The thesis is based on critical work as a theoretical frame and intigrated discourse analysis is used as a method. Our method assisted in identifying three distinct discourses. A recurring cultural discourse culturalises the offending, wich was also evident in the privious research. Additionally, the offenders are portayed within a social psychology discourse, in wich migration causes them to lose authority and leading them to resort to violence. Lastly, we were also able to identify a psychopathological discourse. While these findings indicate different representations of the violence, its causes and its offenders, we show that culturalisation of the offender runs as a main thread throughout the material. / Syftet med studien är att undersöka hur kriminalvårdens kunskapsmaterial framställer förövare inom HRVF. Utgångspunkten för analysen är det kritiska sociala arbetet som teori och en integrerad diskursanalys som metod. Med hjälp av vår ansats så identifierades tre olika diskurser. Förövaren framställdes ständigt ur en kulturell diskurs vilket också var tydligt i den tidigare forskningen. Förövaren beskrivs också ur en socialpsykologisk diskurs där hen förlorar makt i och med migrationen och därav utövar våld. Till sist kunde vi också urskilja hur förövaren framställs ur en psykopatologisk diskurs där hen beskrivs ha psykopatiska drag. Även om dessa fynd visar på olika representationer av våldet, dess orsaker och dess förövare, visar vi att kulturalisering av förövaren löper som en röd tråd genom materialet.