A presente dissertação tem por objetivo o estudo da aplicação do princípio da congruência no Processo Individual do Trabalho. Tal princípio caracteriza-se pelo caráter restritivo da atuação judicial, vinculando a prolação de sentença aos limites da lide. A problemática centra-se no entendimento do conceito de lide, ora entendido simplesmente como pedido, ora como a matéria fática e jurídica levada aos autos, permitindo-se ao magistrado conhecer de pedidos não formulados expressamente, desde que os fatos a eles pertinentes tenham sido discutidos nos autos. A partir da Teoria Instrumentalista do Processo, que admite este modo de resolução de conflitos como um meio para a efetividade do Direito Material, buscou-se identificar a possibilidade de flexibilização do princípio da congruência no Processo Individual do Trabalho, tendo em vista que o estudo deste princípio revelou que a doutrina e a jurisprudência civil e trabalhista já permitem sua relativização ou mitigação em determinados casos, em especial quando se trata da aplicação de norma de ordem pública, uma das características do Direito Material do Trabalho. Ademais, considerando as questões linguísticas implicadas na formulação da pretensão da parte e da sentença, foi feita pesquisa jurisprudencial no sítio eletrônico do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho, de modo a identificar as relações hermenêuticas estabelecidas entre o pedido e a decisão final neste tribunal. Para tanto, foram selecionadas 149 decisões em que se discute a existência ou não de julgamento além dos limites da lide, destacando-se os casos em que o tribunal considerou desnecessária a formulação de pedido expresso para a concessão de direito trabalhista / The purpose of this dissertation is to study the use of the Principle of Ne Ultra et Extra Petita in individual labor process. This principle is defined by the restrictive aspect of the acts of the judge, binding the sentence to the matters under dispute. The core discussion lies on the identification of such matters, which can be seen as simply the pleadings expressed by the parties or as all the matters in connection with the facts merely mentioned by them. The latter position would allow the judicial authority to pronounce a sentence addressing additional matters that were not expressly pleaded by the parties. Based on the idea that the due process of law is an instrument to achieve effectiveness of legal commands, on the already accepted exception of this principle when it comes to public order rules, and also on the assumption that labor law is of public order, this dissertation analyzed the possibility of disregarding the Principle of Ne Ultra et Extra Petita in individual labor process in order to enhance the legal award. In addition to the theoretical analysis, a wide research on the website of the superior labor court (Tribunal Superior do Trabalho) was carried out in order to verify the hermeneutical relations between the pleadings and the dispositions of the judicial decision. Bearing such an objective in mind, 149 decisions on the alleged violation of the Principle of Ne Ultra et Extra Petita were selected and analyzed, focusing on those awards in which the court considered irrelevant the existence of an express pleading in order to grant or deny a specific labor right.

Leibniz publie à Leipzig en 1684 un court opuscule devenu classique, Meditationes de Cognitione, Veritate et Ideis. Cet essai de quelques pages constitue un véritable discours de la méthode pour la philosophie allemande. Ce travail tente de justifier cette assertion en reconstituant les étapes de la réception par Christian Wolff et Emmanuel Kant de ce court texte. Elle est ainsi conduite à étudier le développement en Allemagne d’une Begriffsanalyse. Elle affronte donc ce problème : qu’est-ce qu’analyser pour Wolff puis pour Kant ? L’étude de cette logique des notions, de son lien avec les mathématiques et du concept cartésienne de Mathesis universalis, aboutit à préciser la distinction kantienne entre méthode dogmatique et dogmatisme. Cette enquête remonte aux sources leibniziennes de la division classique des jugements en analytiques et synthétiques. Elle se conclut par l’étude de la critique d’Eberhard. Bref, pour reprendre une formule de Michel Fichant, elle tente d’établir « que derrière l’allemand de Kant se tient le latin de Leibniz ». / Leibniz published in 1684 a short opuscule, Meditationes de Cognitione, Veritate et Ideis. This Leibniz’s essay of few pages is a true discours de la méthode for the German philosophy. This research tries to justify this declaration and restores the reception of this short text by Christian Wolff and Immanuel Kant. This work studies the development of the Begriffsanalyse in Germany. But, what means analysis for Wolff and for Kant? The study of this logic of notions, its bond to mathematics and with the Cartesian conception of Mathesis universalis, clarifies the Kantian distinction between dogmatic method and dogmatism. This inquiry goes back to the Leibnizian origin of the classical division of analytic and synthetic judgments. This work comes to an end by the study of Eberhard’s critic of the Critic. In short, like Michel Fichant formulated, this study wants to make manifest that « behind German words of Kant lay down Latin words of Leibniz ».

This thesis makes use of biopolitical theory to examine the governmental and organizational response to the covid-19-infodemic. It aims to answer the puzzling research question as to why the infodemic – whose inherent problem is an overabundance of information – is responded to and met with even greater amounts of information by governments and health organizations, and what implications these measures may have on the population. The analysis finds that the question can partly be answered by derivation to previous research within the field of crisis communication: the most efficient way to respond to mis- and disinformation is to respond with correct information and with counter arguments. To answer the question in full an analysis of the subject of security is conducted where what can be interpreted from the material, following a modified version of Carol Lee Bacchi’s “What’s the Problem Represented to be?” method, is that the human judgement can be understood as the subject of security. The idea is that by securing the human judgment through improving people’s health literacy, people can be taught to act in a manner which is coherent with the state’s biopolitical goals, i.e. to secure the survival of the population. The analysis also shows that while these measures are made in an effort to secure the population, the measures themselves risk becoming a threat to the very population it is supposed to protect.

Art of Jesuit Chapels of the Deceased The theme of this work is presentation of Jesuit Chapel of the Deceased in Bohemia in the Baroque period. The main idea of these chapels are the last idea of man and reminder to purgatory. The presence of purgatory was unquestionable for Baroque society and very often presentation in art. Purgatory was place, which gives hope to the Catholics for salvation and it was great occasional for using special symbols and emblems, it is a way how the remind a believer to the idea of the Last Judgment.

Johan Adam Heyns is probably the most productive and noteworthy Afrikaans theologian of the twentieth century, born in South Africa. He was a real pioneer in his field. It is a well known fact that the kingdom of God played a vital role in all of his work. In fact, he used it as a systematic-theological category, which flows like a perennial river of opportunity, consistently through all of his writings. It gave him the opportunity to be consistent in both his systematic theology and in his ethics. Heyns used the kingdom of God as a systematic-theological category to show clearly how man and God can be co-workers in this world in a dialogical relationship. This relationship, of which God is the initiator, are characterised by the covenant between God, the Father-King, and man, the obedient child-servant. He also used the opportunity to integrate his love for philosophy with his love for theology. This integration opened up a wide spectrum of thoughts, ideas and meanings which he could scientifically analyze, explore, connect and merge together systematically. His contact with Stoker and their shared Calvinistic worldview as well as their shared Afrikaans culture and Christian religion, together with the influence of amongst others Du Toit and Snyman, Oberholzer, Vollenhoven, Barth, Brunner and Berkouwer, laid the foundation for his frame of reference. Unfortunately there was philosophical flooding from time to time, because it caused him to fill the kingdom of God with philosophical concepts which allowed him to think of the kingdom of God as an ontological cosmic-universal entity. His philosophical background and connection also leads to some inadequate speculations in his theology and especially in his eschatology. Inadmissibly he didn’t always use the Bible appropriately, although his doctrine of Scripture and hermeneutics were satisfactory. Heyns could have explored the important part which prayer must play in theology more thoroughly. But he did pioneer’s work in Dogmatics and Ethics in Afrikaans and as an ecumenist and church leader, which we must really appreciate. Lastly his philosophical modus operandi also had a positive side. It helped him to differentiate between important theological concepts. Heyns distinguished between the rule of God and the kingdom of God, as well as between the realisation of the kingdom of God and the eschatological fulfilment of God’s kingdom. These differentiations were tested on some theological problems, including the question whether the kingdom of God is really an ontological entity, the Theodicy problem and the “Nah-erwartung” problem. It was found that these differentiations, when used consistently, have valuable theological problem solving abilities. Although Heyns perhaps didn’t realise this, and he weren’t consistent in the use of these differentiations, he must be credited for identifying and clarifying them. / Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2010. / Dogmatics and Christian Ethics / unrestricted

No description available.

No description available.

Föreliggande studie undersökte relationen mellan startålder och slutlig behärskning i fonologi och icke-fonologi (ett samlingsbegrepp för morfosyntaktisk och idiomatisk brytning). Deltagarna var 200 spansktalande andraspråkstalare av svenska, 20 modersmålstalare av svenska (kontrollgrupp) och 28 lyssnare med svenska som modersmål. Slutlig förmåga i fonologi och icke-fonologi mättes genom två brytningsbedömningar av lyssnargruppen, en där talarnas faktiska röster användes för att mäta fonologisk förmåga och en där en syntetisk röst användes för att mäta icke-fonologisk förmåga. Studiens resultat visade att det fanns en stark negativ korrelation mellan startålder och slutlig behärskning för både fonologisk och icke-fonologisk förmåga. Korrelationen var starkare för fonologi än för icke-fonologi. Starålder visades även vara den starkaste prediktorn för inföddlik slutlig behärskning, även efter kontroller av andra prediktorer som ålder, vistelsetid i Sverige och grad av andraspråksanvändning (% i förhållande till L1). Sannolikheten att tillägna sig en inföddlik slutlig behärskning var högre ju tidigare startålder talarna hade och endast talare med startålder mellan 1 och 16 uppvisade inföddlikhet i både fonologi och icke-fonologi. Fler talare uppvisade inföddlikhet i icke-fonologi än i fonologi, vilket kan bero på den unika motoriska begränsning tillägnande av fonologi har.

Le développement de la compétence à poser un jugement clinique est essentiel pour l’ensemble des infirmières de soins critiques afin qu’elles offrent des soins sécuritaires et de qualité. Pour ce faire, l’American Association of Critical Care Nurses (2019) recommande l’intégration d’activités d’apprentissage coopératif au sein des programmes de formation continue. Ces activités seraient bénéfiques pour les infirmières novices, mais les connaissances sur le processus d’apprentissage à l’occasion de ces activités et leur apport pour les infirmières expertes demeurent limitées. Présentée sous forme de manuscrit, cette étude qualitative descriptive avait pour but d’explorer, selon la perspective d’infirmières expertes en soins critiques, la contribution d’activités d’apprentissage coopératif à leur compétence à poser un jugement clinique. Elle visait à comprendre le processus et les caractéristiques de ces activités d’apprentissage. Le cadre de référence combinait le modèle du jugement clinique de Tanner (2006) et le modèle d’apprentissage coopératif de Slavin (2014). Des entrevues semi-dirigées ont été réalisées auprès de sept expertes en soins critiques ayant fait l’expérience d’activités d’apprentissage coopératif avec des infirmiers et des infirmières de différents niveaux de développement. L’analyse des données s’est inspirée de l’analyse thématique de Braun et Clarke (2006). L’analyse des données a révélé quatre thèmes. Les deux premiers correspondent aux caractéristiques des activités soit « l’établissement d’un environnement sécuritaire favorise la participation » et « l’hétérogénéité du groupe d’apprenants favorise les échanges ». Les deux autres correspondent aux mécanismes lors des activités : « comparer son raisonnement clinique afin de le remettre en question et prendre conscience de ses automatismes » et « expliquer son raisonnement clinique pour faire l’état de ses connaissances et les approfondir ». À la lumière de ces résultats, des recommandations ont été élaborées afin d’améliorer les programmes de formation continue offerts aux infirmières, dont les expertes, et du fait même, contribuer au développement de leur compétence à poser un jugement clinique. / The development of clinical judgment is essential for all critical care nurses to provide safe and quality care. To this end, the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (2019) recommends incorporating cooperative learning activities in continuing education programs. These activities would be beneficial for novice nurses, but evidence regarding the learning process in these activities and their benefits for expert nurses remains limited. Presented as a manuscript, the purpose of this descriptive qualitative study was to explore, from perspective of expert critical care nurses, the contribution of cooperative learning activities to their clinical judgment competency. Specifically, it aimed to understand the process and characteristics of these activities. The study was based on a framework combining Tanner’s (2006) clinical judgment model and Slavin’s (2014) model of cooperative learning. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven expert critical care nurses who had experienced cooperative learning activities with nurses of different levels of development. Data analysis was based on Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis. Data analysis revealed four themes. The first two correspond to the characteristics of cooperative learning activities, namely « establishing a safe environment fosters participation » and « the heterogeneity of the group of learners fosters exchanges. » The other two reflect the mechanisms operating within the discussion during cooperative learning activities. These themes are « comparing one’s clinical reasoning to question it and become aware of one’s automatisms, » and « explaining one’s clinical reasoning to review and deepen one’s knowledge. » In the light of these results, recommendations are made to improve continuing education programs offered to nurses, including experts, and thereby contribute to the development of their clinical judgment.

This thesis addresses key issues of scientific realism in the philosophy of biology and chemistry through investigation of an underexplored research domain: olfaction theory, or the science of smell. It also provides the first systematic overview of the development of olfactory practices and research into the molecular basis of odours across the 19th and 20th century. Historical and contemporary explanations and modelling techniques for understanding the material basis of odours are analysed with a specific focus on the entrenchment of technological process, research tradition and the definitions of materiality for understanding scientific advancement. The thesis seeks to make sense of the explanatory and problem solving strategies, different ways of reasoning and the construction of facts by drawing attention to the role and application of scientific representations in olfactory practices. Scientific representations such as models, classifications, maps, diagrams, lists etc. serve a variety of purposes that range from the stipulation of relevant properties and correlations of the research materials and the systematic formation of research questions, to the design of experiments that explore or test particular hypotheses. By examining a variety of modelling strategies in olfactory research, I elaborate on how I understand the relation between representations and the world and why this relation requires a pluralist perspective on scientific models, methods and practices. Through this work I will show how a plurality of representations does not pose a problem for realism about scientific entities and their theoretical contexts but, on the contrary, that this plurality serves as the most reliable grounding for a realistic interpretation of scientific representations of the world and the entities it contains. The thesis concludes that scientific judgement has to be understood through its disciplinary trajectory, and that scientific pluralism is a direct consequence of the historicity of scientific development.