This study examines whether there is a wage gap between male and female ordinary judges in the Swedish legal system in the year 2021 and what some of the possible reasons may be for the existing wage gap. The study is based on data obtained from the Swedish National Courts Administration, which includes the 1 000 ordinary judges who are active in the year 2021. The data material is then analyzed using descriptive statistics as well as a bivariate regression analysis to understand if there is an existing wage gap between male and female ordinary judges. To answer the second question, the data material is analyzed using a multiple regression analysis to give us an understanding of what may be the causes of the existing wage gap. The results show that male regular judges earn an average of 1 715 SEK more a month than their female colleagues. In addition, the results of the multiple regression analysis also show that when we use the independent variables that the data material contains, there is in 93 percentage of the cases a statistically significant guaranteed wage gap of 258 SEK per month between male and female ordinary judges in the Swedish legal system.

No description available.

Cette étude montre comment la création d’un Mécanisme de règlement des différends, dont la juridiction est obligatoire pour régler les litiges entre les Membres de l’Organisation mondiale du commerce (OMC), participe au développement du droit international, tant sur le plan normatif qu’institutionnel. Les organes du Mécanisme jouent un rôle crucial dans la centralisation de l’application du droit international des échanges du fait de leur place au sein de la structure de l’OMC, et en raison des compétences juridictionnelles qu’ils exercent. Toutefois, l’action unilatérale des Membres de l’Organisation reste déterminante pour le bon fonctionnement de ce Mécanisme. La saisine de l’Organe de règlement des différends (ORD) sur requête unilatérale, de même que la mise en oeuvre de contre-mesures en cas d’inexécution des décisions de l’ORD, en sont les meilleures preuves. En outre, les rapports des groupes spéciaux (GS) et de l’Organe d’appel (OA) incorporés à ces décisions constituent un droit dérivé jurisprudentiel d’une importance toujours croissante. Enfin, le Mécanisme est au service d’une institution internationale qui n’est pas close sur elle-même. En effet, les organes du Mécanisme interprètent les traités de l’OMC conformément aux règles du droit international coutumier. Et, la production juridique de ces organes est un facteur de modification des normes des ordres juridiques des Membres de l’Organisation, ainsi que des Accords commerciaux régionaux (ACR) auxquels les Membres peuvent être parties. / Whatever the future of the WTO may be, the Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM) as an intergovernmental dispute settlement system is a key institution for the evolution of International Law. Firstly, its compulsory jurisdiction contributes to the structural development of the international legal system by ensuring the centralization of the WTO Law application and a multilateral control on the Member States behaviours. Yet, factors of the DSM success, such as the panel establishment by a Member unilateral request, or such as the complainant Member countermeasures used to make a defender Member comply with the recommendations and rulings of the Dispute Settlement Body(DSB), underline the fact that States remain the major actors of the International legal system.Secondly, the case-law of the DSM (more than 450 cases) is considerable compared to any othercase-law of an inter-governmental litigation settlement organ. At last, the panels and the AppelateBody (AB) apply in their reports the customary international rules to interpret WTO treaties and thus the Understanding on Rules and Procedures governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU).Accordingly, the DSB decisions shall have a great impact on the whole normative development of the international legal system. And eventually, DSB decisions may affect the undergoing change ofthe Members domestic legal systems, and the Regional Trade Agreements (RTA).

L’ère est au débat sur l’expansion désordonnée et la fragmentation du droit international. Après avoir mis tant d’années à résoudre la question ontologique du droit international (existe-t-il ou n’existe-t-il pas ?), l’angoisse de l’internationaliste se poursuit sous de nouveaux auspices : survivra-t-il ou ne survivra-t-il pas à son expansion le parcellisant ? Longtemps délaissée, la question des conflits de normes occupe désormais une place de choix dans ces questionnements. Les conflits de normes, traditionnellement définis comme situation dans laquelle une ou plusieurs normes imposent des obligations qu’il est impossible de satisfaire simultanément, posent un certain nombre de défis au droit international contemporain : bien évidemment quant à leur méthodes de résolution mais également quant à la perception que l’on se fait du droit international dans son ensemble. La question des conflits de normes et celle de l’organisation du droit international (ou surtout la perception que l’on retient) sont consubstantielles. Le problème des conflits de normes n’est ni abordé ou résolu en droit international de la même manière selon que l’on envisage le droit international comme un ordre juridique dont la qualité principale est l’unité (ce qui renvoie à un système clos, rejetant les éléments extérieurs et la pluralité) ou que l’on envisage le droit international comme un système juridique dont la qualité principale est la cohérence et l’organisation (acceptant ainsi la diversité en son sein, notamment l’existence de sous-systèmes). / After years of discussion on the existence of international law, International law scholars are currently focalizing on a new subject: the disordered expansion and the fragmentation of international law. Indeed, conflicts of norms appear to be a new source of anxiety raising a new question: will international law survive? The question focuses on situations where two or more international norms impose international obligations that cannot be simultaneously complied with, which is without doubt a real challenge for modern international law. Trying to resolve that issue requires having a look on the conflict of norms resolution methods, but not only. A more theorical interrogation, that is how international law is thought as a whole, is raised by these situations. Our research shows in that aspect that very different solutions to the issue are conceivable, depending on the conception of international law as a traditional united hierarchized legal system or as a complex and pluralistic “ensemble”.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Roberto Ferreira Archanjo da Silva.pdf: 1923709 bytes, checksum: 72b4c9cc870e5eaa7c5ab269e40af19f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-09-14 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / The criminal proceeding and the Criminal Procedural law had evolved through the conquests of the humanity. The first one, of mere half of application of the sanction to the offender of the criminal law, started to be an instrument of guardianship of the individual against possible state wills, crowned for the basic human rights and guided for the supply-principle of the dignity of the person human being, as reflected of the culture of the democratic societies. The Criminal Procedural law acquired scientific contours in the end of century XIX, due to the own elevation of the Jurisprudence to science. The called general theory of the process aims at in general systemize the studies on the process, without propitiating to the researcher the necessary knowledge for the accurate understanding of the analyzed institute. In Brazil, the process of democratization restored for the Constitution of the Republic of 1988 inspired the elaboration of works specialized for the scientists of the area of the Criminal Procedural law. The understanding of justinian codes, rules and proper principles of the criminal proceeding demands specialized knowledge. These works raise legal science to become efficient the criminal proceeding half to reach the common good, in order to protect the double society in sensible: against the possible current state excesses of power-having to punish in the search offender of the criminal law during criminal persecution e; against the violators of the social peace (the criminals). The meeting of these specialized works of the scientists makes possible the system organization of a proper theory of the Procedural law Criminal, capable to form a new school of criminal procedures. The organization of the legal system through the systematic thought allows the vision of, but without generalizations the all undesirable one, that depreciation the study object. The specialized knowledge can imply in the elaboration of a Code of criminal procedure democratic and efficient, capable to protect the accused and of punishing the criminal in a swift and safe way / O processo penal e o Direito Processual Penal evoluíram através das conquistas da humanidade. O primeiro, de mero meio de aplicação da sanção ao infrator da lei penal, passou a ser um instrumento de tutela do indivíduo contra possíveis arbítrios estatais, coroado pelos direitos humanos fundamentais e norteado pelo supra-princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana, como reflexo da cultura das sociedades democráticas. O Direito Processual Penal adquiriu contornos científicos no final do século XIX, decorrente da própria elevação da Jurisprudência à ciência. A denominada teoria geral do processo visa a sistematizar os estudos sobre o processo em geral, sem propiciar ao pesquisador o conhecimento necessário para a exata compreensão do instituto analisado. No Brasil, o processo de democratização instaurado pela Constituição da República de 1988 inspirou a elaboração de trabalhos especializados pelos cientistas da área do Direito Processual Penal. A compreensão de institutos, regras e princípios próprios do processo penal exige conhecimento especializado. Esses trabalhos elevam a ciência jurídica para tornar o processo penal eficiente meio de alcançar o bem comum, a fim de proteger a sociedade em duplo sentido: contra os possíveis excessos estatais decorrentes do poder-dever de punir na busca infrator da lei penal durante a persecução penal e; contra os violadores da paz social (os criminosos). A reunião desses trabalhos especializados dos cientistas possibilita a organização sistêmica de uma teoria própria do Direito Processual Penal, capaz de formar uma nova escola de processualistas penais. A organização do ordenamento jurídico através do pensamento sistemático permite a visão do todo, mas sem generalizações indesejáveis, que denigrem o objeto de estudo. O conhecimento especializado pode implicar na elaboração de um Código de Processo Penal democrático e eficiente, capaz de proteger o acusado e de punir o culpado de forma célere e segura

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:29:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliana Ferreira Pinto Rocha.pdf: 1024829 bytes, checksum: 265482e2fb169757e1adbb14d66dfb53 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-10-26 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The present study entails theoretical research involving the application of the dogmatic method grounded in the study of the principles of the General Theory of Law, starting out from the Positive Law System as a point of reference, with the aim of furthering investigation on accessory tax liability within the context of the Brazilian Legal System, and according to the prescriptive statements of the National Tax Code and its application under the national doctrine. The main aim was to demonstrate the discipline of accessory tax liability, as incorporated within the Brazilian Positive Law System, i.e., constituting liabilities and taxes while also being subject to Constitutional Tax Legal System, thereby diverging from the concept of being a mere administrative, instrumental or formal obligation. The study concludes by demonstrating that the discipline of accessory tax liability requires, as a form of fair taxation based on the principles of lawfulness, typicity, taxpaying ability and legal safety which uphold the Democratic Rule of Law, that the imposed legal rules of law of accessory tax liabilities, as well as legal sanctioning rules applied upon non-fulfillment, respect the limits established and applied by the Constitutional Tax Legal System / O presente trabalho trata de pesquisa teórica com aplicação do método dogmático fundamentado no estudo dos princípios da Teoria Geral do Direito, partindo do Sistema de Direito Positivo como referência, com a finalidade de aprofundar os estudos sobre a obrigação tributária acessória a partir da realidade do nosso ordenamento jurídico, visto a partir dos enunciados prescritivos do Código Tributário Nacional e da sua aplicação pela doutrina pátria. O objetivo principal é demonstrar a disciplina da obrigação tributária acessória da forma como está inserida no nosso Sistema de Direito Positivo, isto é, são obrigações e são tributárias, além de estarem sujeitas ao regime jurídico constitucional tributário, afastando assim a concepção de mero dever administrativo, instrumental ou formal. Ao final, será demonstrado que a disciplina da obrigação tributária acessória exige como forma de tributação justa, fundada nos princípios da legalidade, da tipicidade, capacidade contributiva e da segurança jurídica, fazendo valer os ditames do Estado Democrático de Direito, que as normas jurídicas impositivas de obrigações tributárias acessórias, bem como as normas jurídicas de caráter sancionatório e aplicadas pelo seu descumprimento, observem os limites traçados e aplicados pelo regime jurídico constitucional-tributário

No description available.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Francis Ted Fernandes.pdf: 853394 bytes, checksum: df350b7125c4dde59f0cbfea3caf57d4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-14 / Determining what legal principals are is an arduous task. The uncertainty peculiar to signs, the ambiguity of the language and the decoding of this legal term, not always performed under scientific criteria, are the first obstacles to be overcome in this endeavor. One way to determine what legal principles are is to analyze their meaning and function according to the understanding of the main schools of legal thought: the school of natural law, positivism and post-positivism. For the school of natural law, principles are values arising from the human reason. Positivism basically presents two conceptions on principles: the first one does not address the issue, since the legal system would be complete, self-sufficient and non-evaluative. The second conception of the positivist school recognizes the principles as bridging standards, which could never be opposed to the law, intended to fill the gaps in the legal system. The vision of positivism on the principles shows that this school of thought sees the legal system as a closed one, whose validity foundation lies in its own standards, which, in turn, are founded on a fundamental standard, which is assumed and not expressed. For this line of thought, any content can be right, being unimportant to question the material morality or immorality of a legal text. The neutrality of positivism in face of the legal content of law has ended up involuntarily legitimizing some arbitrary and totalitarian regimes. The failure of positivism in responding to certain situations has demanded an evolution in legal thinking and codifications, which propitiated an opening of the legal system to values and the consideration of content of what is right. In this new chapter of history, arises the post-positivist thought, which admits the principles as positivized values in the system, true standards that can solve concrete cases, as long as applied with an appropriate methodology. In addition to the standards, applicable to the greatest extent possible, the principles are considered as nuclear commandments of the legal system, which structures this system, granting unity to it, and, also, acting as vectors of interpretation of legal rules. Currently, in Brazil, the principles are also designed as bridging standards by virtue of the application of article 4 of the Law of Introduction to the Standards in Brazilian Law, since they were designed for the positivist school. There are several deviations on the application of legal principles, such as practices consisting in moving away the application of rules to certain concrete cases, under the guise of providing a solution based on principles, an effective expedient without a cohesive method and without justification supported by a solid argumentative process. This practice represents a risk to the typical activity of the Legislative Branch. It is assumed that the interpretation of the law and the resolution of concrete cases based on principles broadens the sphere of indeterminacy to which the interpreter is subjected, but this indeterminacy must be admitted, with a view to achieving the implicit justice claim in the legal system / Determinar o que são os princípios jurídicos é uma tarefa árdua. A imprecisão peculiar dos signos, a ambiguidade da linguagem e a decodificação deste termo jurídico, nem sempre realizada com critérios científicos, são os primeiros obstáculos que devem ser superados nesta empreitada. Uma forma de determinar o que são princípios jurídicos é analisar o seu significado e função de acordo com o entendimento das principais escolas do pensamento jurídico: o jusnaturalismo, o positivismo e o pós-positivismo. Para escola jusnaturalista os princípios são valores decorrentes da razão humana. O positivismo apresenta basicamente duas concepções sobre os princípios: a primeira não aborda o tema, já que o ordenamento jurídico seria completo, autossuficiente e avalorativo. A segunda concepção da escola positivista reconhece os princípios como normas de colmatação, que nunca poderiam se opor à lei, destinadas a preencher lacunas do ordenamento jurídico. A visão do positivismo sobre os princípios demonstra que esta escola do pensamento concebe o sistema jurídico como um sistema fechado, cujo fundamento de validade são suas próprias normas, que, por sua vez, encontram fundamento numa norma fundamental, que é pressuposta e não expressa. Para esta linha do pensamento, qualquer conteúdo pode ser direito, sendo despiciendo o questionamento sobre a moralidade ou imoralidade material de um texto legal. A neutralidade do positivismo para com o conteúdo legal do direito terminou por legitimar, involuntariamente, alguns regimes arbitrários e totalitaristas. A insuficiência do positivismo para dar resposta a determinadas situações exigiu uma evolução no pensamento jurídico e nas codificações, o que propiciou uma abertura do sistema jurídico a valores e à consideração do conteúdo do que é direito. Nessa nova quadra da história surge o pensamento pós-positivista, que admite os princípios como valores positivados no sistema, verdadeiras normas que podem solucionar os casos concretos, desde que aplicadas com uma metodologia adequada. Além de normas, aplicáveis na maior medida do possível, os princípios são considerados como mandamentos nucleares do sistema jurídico, que estruturam este sistema, conferindo unidade a ele e, ainda, atuando como vetores de interpretação das regras jurídicas. Atualmente, no Brasil, os princípios também são concebidos como normas de colmatação, por força da aplicação do artigo 4º da Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro, como eram concebidos para escola positivista. Existem vários desvios na aplicação dos princípios jurídicos, como as práticas consistentes em afastar a aplicação das regras a determinados casos concretos, sob o pretexto de se dar uma solução com base em princípios, expediente efetivado sem um método coeso e sem justificativa lastreada num processo argumentativo sólido. Esta prática representa um risco à atividade típica do Poder Legislativo. Admite-se que a interpretação do direito e a solução de casos concretos, com base em princípios, amplia a esfera de indeterminação a que se sujeita ao intérprete, mas esta indeterminação deve ser admitida, com vistas a alcançar a pretensão de justiça implícita no ordenamento jurídico

O presente trabalho parte da análise das normas que regem a tributação da renda no mercado imobiliário com a finalidade de possibilitar a identificação de um sistema jurídico dotado de princípios e valores próprios, que possibilite o estudo de suas normas de maneira destacada em relação às demais disposições que versam sobre a imposição da renda. Não se tem por pretensão a busca de uma autonomia das mencionadas normas; pelo contrário, o estudo parte da premissa de um único sistema jurídico, mas que pode ser estudado sob diferentes pontos de vista: um sistema que comporta subsistemas normativos, com valores e princípios próprios. Objetiva-se, assim, a identificação e posterior aproximação daquelas disposições que possuem fundamentos e princípios comuns, o que possibilitará a compreensão da extensão das previsões normativas a serem analisadas, bem como as opções efetuadas pelo legislador na produção legislativa. Antes de se efetuar o estudo das normas que versam sobre a tributação da renda imobiliária serão discutidos e apresentados os conceitos gerais necessários às análises que se seguirão. A limitação do legislador na produção legislativa é aspecto central no presente estudo. Entende-se que o sistema jurídico justo demanda uma coerência alcançada somente quando verificada a adequação valorativa das normas que o compõem e apresente unidade, por meio da observância de princípios e valores comuns, por essas mesmas normas. As normas que prevêem as imposições fiscais incidentes sobre renda no mercado imobiliário se prestarão de pano de fundo para a identificação de princípios que regem a tributação do imposto de renda nas diversas situações apresentadas. Serão, assim, objeto de análise a tributação do imposto de renda das pessoas jurídicas, tributadas pelo lucro real e pelo lucro presumido; a tributação especial das pessoas jurídicas sujeitas ao patrimônio de afetação; os rendimentos auferidos pelas pessoas físicas decorrente das atividades ligadas ao mercado imobiliário, tais como o ganho de capital na venda de imóveis e a tributação dos fundos de investimento imobiliários. Ao final da análise da legislação que versa sobre a tributação do imposto de renda nas situações acima mencionadas serão apresentados os princípios e valores escolhidos pelo legislador para a imposição da renda imobiliária. / The present arises from the analysis of principles which rule the taxation on the real estate market aiming the possibility of identifying a legal system endowed with principles and self-values and also providing an outstanding study of its rules with relation to the other provisions which deal with the income taxation. There is no intention of the search of independence from the aforementioned provisions, on the contrary, the study arises from the assumption of a unique legal system, which otherwise may be studied under different points of view, a system which involves normative sub-systems with their own values and principles. It aims, therefore, the identification and later approach to those provisions which own principles and grounds in common, providing that way, the understanding of the extension of the normative foresight to be analyzed, as well as, the legislator\'s altematives when making laws. Before the study of the principles which deal with the real estate income taxation, the general concepts needed to the analysis shall be presented and discussed. The legislator limitation to the law making shall be the central aspect of the present study. It is understood that a fair legal system demands coherence, which is just achieved when the appropriate principle values which integrate it are consolidated by the observance of the common principles and values of such principles. The rules, which provide the tax enforcement collected on the real estate income, shall be the grounds for the identification of the principles which rule the taxation on the income tax of the different situations herein presented. The corporation income tax, collected on presumed and gross profits, special corporation taxation liable to the \"patrimônio de afetação\", the earnings obtained by the individual persons regarding real estate businesses such as capital gain in property sales and the taxation on real estate funds of investments will, therefore, be the object of the analysis. After the analysis of the legislation which deals with the taxation on the income tax of the aforementioned situations, the principles and values enforced on real state earnings chosen by the legislator shall be presented.

( in English) In this Diploma Thesis the activity of Extraordinary People's Court in Jihlava during the first phase of restitution period (1945-1947) is investigated via the means of a case study. Todate investigations of retribution courts have been focused on the analysis of retributive judgments. This thesis differs from the earlier ones namely in the angle of view on retribution court's activity. The research is concentrated on the administrative operation of the retribution court in Jihlava (i.e. on the activity of retribution court head and their deputies) and on the role of individual retribution senate heads. The decision making of retribution court is not looked at only as a result of court's operation, but individual court senates' operation is subject of analysis here. Particular criminal cases are taken into account only when there is an assumption that they help to uncover day-to-day working habits of judicial officers, or, potentially, they are related to the person of the head of senate, or the filed material in its content gets beyond standard retribution proceedings at Jihlava retribution court. The thesis has used mainly sources of official origin filed with the Regional Archive in Brno, the National Archive, and the Security Services Archive.