A atividade do docente que ensina matemática, se compreendida como uma prática social, pode ser estudada tendo como suporte referenciais teóricos e metodológicos de abordagens sociológicas. O objetivo do estudo foi identificar, analisar e discutir elementos constitutivos da atividade docente relacionados aos saberes, à autoridade, à autonomia e à alteridade, manifestados em processos de interação durante a resolução de problemas em aulas de matemática. Trata-se de uma pesquisa qualitativa orientada pelas ações de quatro professoras, participantes da pesquisa, que lecionam matemática nos anos iniciais de uma escola municipal de ensino fundamental situada na zona sul da cidade de São Paulo. Os dados empíricos foram produzidos entre junho de 2016 e novembro de 2017 a partir de fontes e procedimentos diversificados: a) encontros de formação continuada de matemática coordenados pelo pesquisador, ocorridos na própria escola; b) planejamentos de aulas de matemática feitos pelas quatro professoras; c) interações ocorridas entre os alunos e entre estes e as professoras no desenvolvimento das aulas planejadas; d) acompanhamento das aulas pelo investigador. A interpretação e análise dos dados reunidos por meio de questionários, produção escrita, mensagens eletrônicas e observações de aula apoiaram-se em procedimentos metodológicos da Sociologia Pragmática e embasamentos teóricos relativos às políticas públicas de educação e de formação de professores, à resolução de problemas, à comunicação e à interação nas aulas de matemática e aos saberes, à alteridade, à autonomia e à autoridade docentes. Os resultados dessa análise confirmaram: (i) a hipótese da pesquisa de que as quatro professoras mobilizaram, além de saberes disciplinares, curriculares e experienciais relativos ao ensino e à aprendizagem de matemática, aspectos relativos à alteridade, autonomia e autoridade docentes nos processos interativos estabelecidos entre elas e os alunos; (ii) a necessidade de refletir e problematizar os impactos de políticas públicas de formação, inicial e continuada de professores, que desconsideram a condição docente, o papel e a importância do professor na explicitação do que consiste a natureza do seu trabalho. As análises sugerem a defesa de políticas públicas educacionais que dignifiquem tanto a condição quanto o papel do professor da escola básica, convocando-o para o debate e a participação direta na formulação destas políticas, não o concebendo somente como mero executor de ações decididas por atores sociais externos ao seu contexto de trabalho. / Mathematics teaching activity, if understood as a social practice, can be investigated having as a support specific theoretical and methodological references of sociological approaches. The aim of this study was to identify, analyze, and discuss constitutive elements of teaching activity related to acquirements, alterity, autonomy, and authority expressed in interacting processes during problem solving in Mathematics classes. It is a qualitative research guided by four teachers actions; these teachers, subjects of the research, teach Mathematics in the first years of a community basic school located in South of São Paulo. Empirical data have been generated between June 2016 and November 2017 from different sources and procedures: a) continued formation meetings on Mathematics coordinated by the researcher, which took place at the school itself; b) Mathematics classes planning made by above-mentioned four teachers; c) interactions occurring between students and between them and above-mentioned teachers in developing planned classes; d) resort to questionnaires, written production, e-mails, class monitoring and records. Data interpretation and analysis were based on methodological procedures from Pragmatic Sociology and theoretical foundations related to public policies on education and teacher formation, problem solving, communication and interaction in Mathematics classes, and to teachers acquirements, alterity, autonomy, and authority. This analysis led us to the following results: (i) they confirmed the research hypothesis that besides disciplinary, curriculum, and experimental acquirements related to Mathematics teaching and learning these four teachers mobilized aspects related to teachers alterity, autonomy, and authority in the interactive processes established between them and their students; (ii) they confirmed the need to reflect upon and question the impacts of initial and continued teachers formation public policies that disregard teaching condition and teachers role and importance in making explicit the nature of their work. The analyses suggest one should support educational public policies that promote both teachers condition and role in basic schools, calling them in for a debate and a direct involvement in shaping these policies, instead of framing them only as mere executors of actions decided by social actors external to their work environment.

L'objectif de cette recherche est d'identifier et d'analyser des dispositions et des logiques d'actions des enseignants lorsqu'ils se trouvent face à une situation liée à la question religieuse dans deux pays qui se définissent comme laïque, à savoir, le Brésil et la France. Il s'agit d'une étude d'inspiration ethnographique dans une perspective d'étude comparée. La recherche se situe dans le cadre de la Sociologie de l'éducation et utilise la sociologie de la socialisation et la sociologie pragmatique comme principaux cadres théoriques. A partir de cela, nous analysons les les dispositions et les principes de justice dans la pratique des enseignements brésiliens et français aux collèges publics. Ainsi les questions qui ont motivées la recherche sont : comment les enseignants traitent-ils une situation impliquant la question religieuse ? Pourquoi agissent-ils de cette façon ? Quelle(s) logique(s) d'action sont mobilisées dans les pratiques enseignantes? Quelles dispositions contribuent au "choix" de la logique d'action ? Comment les configurations sociales influencent-elles la question religieuse ? Existe-t-il des différences entre la pratique enseignante liée aux situations impliquant la question religieuse et la pratique enseignante tout court ? Pour répondre à ces questions une trentaine d'entretiens ont été effectués avec des enseignants brésiliens et français et trois établissement public ont été le cadre d'un travail d'observation (deux établissement au Brésil et Un en France), Les deux méthodes donnant accès à la description de situations professionnelles concernant les religions. La façon ont les enseignants gèrent la question religieuse privilégie la logique libérale au Brésil et la logique civique en France. En ce qui concerne les dispositions des enseignants, nous avons identifié des dispositions hybrides dans les actions brésiliennes et des dispositions professionnelles dans l'activité enseignante française. Enfin, nous avons mis au jour une logique d'action propre à la profession enseignante dans les deux pays, ce que nous appelons la logique professorale. / The purpose of this research is to identify and analyze the teachers' dispositions and logic of actions when faced with a sotuation related to the religious question in two countries that define themselves as secular,such a Brazil and France. this is an ethnographic-inspired study wich mobilizes a comparative education perspective. The research is situated within the field of the Sociology of Education and uses the sociology of socialization and pragmatic sociology as the main theoretical frameworks. Therefore, we analyze the provisions and pinciples of justice in the pratice of Brazilian and French teachers at public colleges. Thus, the queestions that motived the research are : how do the teachers deal with a situation involving the religious question ? Why do they act this way ? What logic(s) of action are mobilized in teaching pratices ? Wich dispositions contribute to the "choice" of the logic action ? How social configurations influence teaching practice with regard to the religious question ? Are there differences between the teaching pratice itself ? To answer these questions,approximately thirty interviews were conducted with Brazilian and french teachers and three public institutions were part of a field observation (two institutions in Brazil and one in France), the two methods giving access to the description of professional situations concerning religions. The liberal logic identified in the pratices of Brazilian teachers and the civic logic favored in France in situations involving the religious questions are different wayss to guarantee secularism. Regarding teachers' dispositions, we have identified hybrid dispositions in Brazilian actions and professional dispositions in the French teaching practice. Finally, we have brought to light a logic of action peculiar to the teaching profession in both countries, what we call the teaching logic.

Cette thèse explore dans quelle mesure la comptabilité peut jouer un rôle dans le dévoilement et la remise en cause publics d’une situation de domination, et ainsi contribuer à une certaine forme d’émancipation. Au plus près des interprétations des acteurs, cette thèse suit les voix libérales dévoilant et remettant en cause la domination des discours et des principes de rationalisation et de régulation financières à l’œuvre dans le football professionnel français. La comptabilité du football français est particulièrement exposée, du fait de la médiatisation et de la financiarisation intenses de ce secteur. Cette thèse s’appuie sur la sociologie pragmatique de la critique (à travers les travaux de Luc Boltanski) et considère les acteurs comme capables de critiques et de dévoilements. Au sein de trois essais, nous montrons 1/ comment des chiffres comptables préalablement divulgués par les clubs peuvent être mis en scène, par des acteurs débattant au sein d’une émission de radio, pour promouvoir une vision libérale ou une vision régulée du football français, 2/ comment les contrôleurs de gestion d’un club se saisissent de la critique pour dévoiler et remettre en cause la domination institutionnelle du régulateur financier du football français, et 3/ comment les pratiques d’accountability de managers d’un club, en réponse à la critique publique, leur permettent de légitimer leur organisation en justifiant sa non-conformité. Si la comptabilité, dans le sillage de la sociologie critique, a souvent été décrite comme un outil au service de dominations à l’œuvre, nous montrons dans cette thèse qu’elle peut également favoriser dévoilement et émancipation. / This dissertation explores to what extent accounting can play a role in how actors publicly unveil and denounce a situation of domination, thereby contributing to a form of emancipation. Listening to the actors’ interpretations, this dissertation follows the liberal voices which unveil and denounce the domination of the discourses and principles on financial regulation and rationalization for French professional football. French football accounting is particularly exposed, due to the high media coverage and financialization of the sector. This dissertation builds on the “pragmatic sociology of critique” (through the work of Luc Boltanski), and sees actors as having critical and unveiling competences. In three essays, we show 1/ how clubs’ disclosed accounting numbers can be staged by actors debating in a radio talk-show, to promote a liberal or regulated vision of French football, 2/ how management accountants in a club use their critical competences to unveil and denounce the institutional domination of the French football financial regulatory body, and 3/ how accountability practices of club’s managers undertaken to respond to public criticism, enable them to legitimize their organization by justifying its non-conformity. While accounting has often been described as serving dominant interests following the “critical sociology” tradition, our dissertation shows that accounting can also favor unveiling and emancipation.

Peu de recherches se sont intéressées aux questions du dévoilement d'une agression sexuelle. Employant quelques concepts de la théorie de la sociologie pragmatique, cette thèse de maîtrise fait l'étude des expériences personnelles des étudiant(e)s à l'égard du dévoilement d'une agression sexuelle. Il s'agit d'une recherche qualitative reposant sur les témoignages de onze étudiant(e)s de l'Université d'Ottawa qui ont vécu une agression sexuelle durant leurs études postsecondaires, et qui ont été amené(e)s à dévoiler leur expérience à une personne ou à un service d'aide. En analysant les résultats de recherche, il en ressort que les participant(e)s ont progressé dans leur appréhension de l'agression, tout comme dans leurs logiques de dévoilement, ainsi que dans les types de dévoilement (spontané, justifié par des motifs personnels, et justifié par des motifs altruistes) - trois notions qui sont introduites. Les résultats mettent également en lumière un aspect peu connu : les réactions qui peuvent ou non faciliter un dévoilement. Cette recherche permet d'apporter un nouveau savoir sur la dynamique des décisions qui mènent un/une étudiant(e) à dévoiler sa situation d'agression sexuelle, tout en ouvrant un large espace de nouveaux questionnements. (Abstract) There is little research focused on the disclosure of a sexual assault. Employing some concepts from the pragmatic sociology theory, this master's thesis examines the personal experiences of students with respect to the disclosure of a sexual assault. This qualitative research is based on the testimonies of eleven students from the University of Ottawa who have experienced a sexual assault during their post-secondary education, and who have been led to disclose their situation to a person or a help service. In analyzing the results of this study, it emerges that the participants have progressed in their apprehension of the assault, as well as in their logics and types of disclosure (spontaneous, justified by personal motives, and justified by altruistic motives) - three notions that are introduced. The findings also shed light on a little-known aspect: the reactions that may or may not facilitate a disclosure. This research provides new knowledge on the dynamics of the decisions that leads a student to reveal his or her situation of sexual assault, while opening up a vast space for further questions.

Cette recherche interroge, dans une perspective pragmatique, la teneur des disputes entre pairs dans les cours de récréation à l'école élémentaire. Le régime de dispute en violence (Boltanski, 1990), caractérisé par des épreuves de force engageant exclusivement la force des personnes constitue le pivot de notre recherche. Comment et sous quelles conditions les interactions enfantines basculent-elles dans le régime de dispute en violence ou inversement sortent-elles de ce régime ? A l'aide d'une méthodologie fondée sur une approche ethnographique (observations et entretiens semi-scénarisés) et des questionnaires soumis aux écoliers, nous avons été en mesure de caractériser les formes émergentes de ce régime de dispute en violence, révélant ainsi une violence protéiforme ne se limitant pas au seul phénomène du harcèlement. Nous avons démontré que les écoliers recourent à des normes corporelles spécifiques et à des principes issus du monde domestique et du monde civique en vue de stabiliser l'ordre social en récréation et peuvent, sous certaines conditions, employer la violence comme un dispositif visant à contrecarrer les menaces pesant sur ces normes et principes. La compétence à s'extraire du régime de violence est apparue fortement corrélée aux dispositifs pédagogiques en place dans les écoles et à la grandeur que les élèves accordent aux enseignants ainsi qu'aux justifications et dispositifs que ces derniers emploient. La grandeur accordée à ces dispositifs et à la figure enseignante s'est enfin révélée, au fil de l'analyse comme étant étroitement imbriquée à la grandeur politique et civique que les enseignants accordent à l'écolier. / This sociological research deals with arguments among children in the school playground at primary school and follows a pragmatic sociological approach. The violent argument regime (Boltanski, 1990), is characterised by power struggles, that exclusively involves people strenght, without any principles. This violent argument regime is the centre of this research. How, and under which conditions peer interactions can get out of that regime? Using a methodology built on an ethnographic approach (observations and interviews based on scenarios) and on questionnaries to pupils, we've been able to characterise the emerging forms of the violent regime, and we showed the existence of a multifaceted violence at elementary school that can't be reduced merely to schoolbullying : this analysis's questionning the psychological approach of schoolbullying at school and discards the portraits of pupils who are either a persecutor or a victim : they can be both of them. Furthermore, pupils use physical norms and principles of justice that come from the domestic and the civic spheres in order to regulate the social order in the school playground and to get out of the violent regime. However, they can also, in the name of those principles, use violence as a device which enable them to stem the threats to those same principles. Moreover, the pupils ability to get out of the violence regime is linked to the teaching devices in the schools and to pupils perception of the teachers and the regulations that teachers use – or don't use. Some teaching devices could help pupils to get out of the violent argument regime and could restructure pupils principles and norms of justice.