Spelling suggestions: "subject:"schechner.""
51 |
Krigföringens principer : Fina ord eller nyttiga lärdomar? En teoriprövande studie av Marvin Pokrants krigföringsprinciperÅkerström, Andreas January 2024 (has links)
The Principles of War have long been debated about their relevance and usefulness within the military context. Some theorists think that the Principles of War are laws that should be followed to achieve success in battle, while others see them more as guidelines. The principles have also been discussed on which level and type of warfare they should apply on, furthermore which types of principles to include. A theorist that has published a revised set of nine principles is Marvin Pokrant (2021), these Principles of War aim to be relevant across all levels and types of warfare. They are also one of the most contemporary sets of principles and has not yet been tested. Therefore, are the purpose of this study to both contribute to the overall research about the principles of war and more specifically if Pokrant’s (2021) set of principles has any explanatory value about success in modern military operations. The result of this study shows that this set of principles has explanatory value about the success in modern military operations. This is because the successful case had eight out of nine principles present, while the unsuccessful case only had two.
|
52 |
後冷戰時期歐盟與俄羅斯合作關係之研究 / The Cooperative Relationship Between the EU and Russia in the Post Cold War Era楊爵鴻, Yang, Johong Unknown Date (has links)
冷戰結束改變歐洲的政治和戰略版圖,歐洲與俄羅斯希望在後冷戰時期建立多極體系,避免以美國為主的單極體系出現,雙方在經濟與政治上逐步發展伙伴合作關係,希望削弱美國在歐陸的影響力,並增強雙方在國際上的競爭力。然而,歐俄間在北約東擴、歐盟東擴、車臣問題、加里寧格勒問題上又存在許多衝突。因此,後冷戰時期歐俄雙邊主要特徵如下:既競爭又協調、既爭奪又合作、既對抗又妥協。本文欲針對以下幾個問題加以討論:
1.後冷戰時期使歐盟與俄羅斯改變過去的敵對狀態發展合作關係的因素為何?
2.目前歐盟與俄羅斯的合作關係為何?
3.影響歐俄合作關係的變數為何?
本文主要採用歷史研究法、內容分析法與理性選擇分析法等三種方法來進行研究,並且運用現實主義的理論分析後冷戰時期歐俄建構合作關係的成因,以新功能主義的觀念解釋歐俄從經濟的合作逐漸轉為政治的合作的歷程、並且以新自由制度主義的理論討論歐俄合作機制的架構。本論文由五個章節組成:第一章緒論、第二章歐盟與俄羅斯的關係、第三章歐盟與俄羅斯合作關係之評估、第四章影響未來歐盟與俄羅斯合作關係之變數、第五章結論。
|
53 |
Low Intensity Conflict: Contemporary Approaches and Strategic ThinkingSearle, Deane January 2007 (has links)
Low Intensity Conflict (LIC) is a significant feature of the contemporary world and it is a particular challenge to the armed forces of many states which are involved is such conflict, or are likely to become so. This thesis is not concerned with how such difficult conflict situations arise. Rather it is concerned with how, from the point of view of the state, they may be contained and ultimately brought to a satisfactory resolution. The work is thus concerned with the practicalities of ending LIC. More specifically, the purpose of this research is to establish a framework of doctrinal and military principles applicable to the prevention and resolution of LIC. The principles of this thesis are based in numerous historical examples of LIC and six in depth case studies. These distilled principles are analysed in two central chapters, and are then applied in two latter defence force chapters so as to ensure there practicality and resilience. Numerous defence academics and military practitioners have been consulted in the production of this thesis; their contribution has further reinforced the functionality of the principles examined in this research. The research illustrates the criticality of a holistic approach to LIC. The function of this approach is to guarantee the stability of the sovereign state, by unifying civil, police, intelligence and military services. The effectiveness of the military elements must also be ensured, as military force is central to the suppression of LIC. Consequently, the research makes strategic and operational prescriptions, so as to improve the capability of defence forces that are concerned with preventing or resolving LIC.
|
Page generated in 0.0417 seconds